Affirmative action's silver lining

The negative consequences of affirmative action are well-known (to anybody who wants to know) but sometimes we can benefit from it as well.  We assume that, when a person is hired for a specific task, it would be good if he performs his task well – but there is an exception to this rule: cogs of government apparatus, whose jobs are designed to make the rest of us miserable and otherwise persecute us.  It is sometimes better if they do their jobs poorly.
On my return from one of my vacations, I realized I had a couple of large water bottles in my carry-on luggage.  Waiting in line in security, I noticed that the person in charge of the x-ray machine my luggage was about to pass through was an overweight black woman.  I thought to myself, “if she is well-trained and cares about her job, those two water bottles will be obvious to her and she’ll pull them out, at which point I’ll say I’d forgotten about them”.  I reasoned that since this person is likely an affirmative action employee, her skills are probably inferior and she’ll miss the bottles – and so it was.  Others might think: “she allowed a dangerous substance onto the airplane; he could have drowned somebody with that water if he’d poured it into a large bowl and then held the victim’s face under it.  Of course he is not a terrorist but I shudder to think what carnage a terrorist might have wraught with that water!”  My attitude was a bit different:  “I drank that water to assuage my thirst and it was good.”
On another occassion, I had to help a relative acquire a state I.D. card from the D.M.V.  There were irregularities, in the spelling of her name, that might have raised a red flag.  Furthermore, there was another technicality that might easily have thwarted our efforts and then things would have gotten hairy.  As we waited in line, I noticed that all the clerks were white except for one tall young black man, whose cranial capacity seemed deficient in relation to his body size.  He appeared clueless and I hoped we would end up with him – and so it was.  He did notice the spelling irregularity and asked about the extra “apostrophe” in one of the documents.  I answered him matter-of-factly “oh, that’s only a diacritical mark; it’s nothing”.  Indeed, it was nothing of importance but there is no doubt that he had no clue what a diacritical mark was.  As for the other documents, he didn’t even look at them.  Within five minutes, we had our document.  Yes, we had probably benefited from affirmative action/diversity in this case.  A more knowledgeable or conscientious employee might have caused us serious grief.
Of course, even in government positions, we sometimes prefer that employees actually do perform their jobs well.  We generally want good cops, firemen and park rangers.  It really depends on the case in question.  We want what works out best for us each time.  An overabundance of laws, regulations and government agencies already guarantee a certain degree of chaos.  Add in affirmative action and we’ve got even more chaos.  As a result, it is anybody’s guess how a visit to a government agency will turn out.  Even though, in both of the above situations, things turned out well for me, I would have preferred that the outcome was positive for different reasons.  I would have preferred that there was no rule against bringing water on to an airplane to begin with and I would have preferred that all the D.M.V. employees were good and competent people and that the one who gave us our document did so because he trusted me and allowed me to explain the situation.  It should not be necessary for me to pull an “idiocracy” on a borderline retard.

This entry was posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Affirmative action's silver lining

  1. Portland Realist says:

    Another fine post J.A.Y.
    I learned recently that any private company that enters into a contract with the Federal government must provide a written policy of affirmative action. This could explain in large part, the demise of “The Big Three” automakers. Of course, look at the make up of Detroit, not exactly the cream of the genetic crop.
    Also, Toyota took a lot of heat from racial activist groups by locating their factories within 25 or so miles from solidly white communities, then they implemented a policy of only hiring locally. Which resulted in a solidly white workforce. Toyota stated their policy was implemented to foment a “sense of community”, but it’s pretty obvious what they were doing.
    Also, if you ever wonder why Trimet is ran so poorly, well, they have some fat black mommas in management over there.
    Lastly, Mussolini made the trains run on time. The National Socialist economy was massively efficient. Why? A right wing government can run effective government agencies, it is the left wing government agencies (the only ones we experience), that suck massive ass.

    • countenance says:

      This is why I cringed when white union members hammered up Japanese cars in the early 1990s when the Japanese PM (?) made that snarky remark about lazy American blacks. I mean, they should have given that car some wax polish!

  2. Dregs says:

    Don’t discount another aspect of low-level (and high-level!) government employees: they enjoy wielding the power they are given, which frequently manifests itself in acting the petty tyrant over others without reason. So while the affirmative action effect you describe may occassionally work in one’s favor, more often than that, one is faced with a (dumb) government employee who might turn you down for something on a technicality or just refuse to provide good service … simply because they can. It really doesn’t take much intelligence to be a petty tyrant. So affirmative action or not, the key is whether the government employee is on some level corrupt, i.e. abusing of the power they have over the people they are supposed to “serve”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *