violent black racism

Back in March of this year, we read about “flash mobs” materializing in Philadelphia.  During these events, hundreds (if not thousands) of blacks descended upon innocent whites.  Practically all of the perpetrators were black and the victims were white.  Some people were seriously injured.  This happened more than once and, as usual, the media downplayed the racial aspect of it.  The New York Times didn’t even mention “race” until paragraph 15 – and then only after blaming the problem on a lack of programs and jobs for kids.
In May of this year, we read how black criminals systematically victimize Asians in San Francisco.  The San Francisco Chronicle, to its credit, openly stated the racial aspect of these crimes – but this news received virtually no national coverage from mainstream newspapers.  The only way to find out about it, for most people, was to specifically search for it online or to frequent white nationalist (or Asian) websites.
In August of this year, we read how black thugs were targeting Mexican migrants in Staten Island.  These crimes were reported by the Los Angeles Times which clearly stated the racial reality of the situation.  Unfortunately, the article made it seem as if these victims, only ten in number, were not representative of a larger trend.  Thus, the reader is left with the impression that this is an aberration.  It is also clear that the victims merit “hate-crime victim” status only because they are Hispanic.  Had they been white, not a word would have been said about it.
Also in August of this year, we read how dozens of wild blacks roamed the Iowa State Fairgrounds and beat up random whites.  The perpetrators were heard shouting about “beat whitey night”.  The Des Moines Register was clearly more concerned about an Aryan group that raised objections about the double standard applied to whites when it comes to “hate crimes”.  They quoted FBI director Louis Freeh that the Aryan Nations “represent a continuing terrorist threat.”  I would like to know when there has been a recent incident of white mobs targeting non-whites for violence in this country. This is a clear case of blaming the victim.  In the meantime, a police spokeswoman dared speak the truth and she was heavily penalized for it.
Over a hundred years ago, my family left Czarist Russia because of anti-Jewish pogroms.  They were among hundreds of thousands of other Jews who saw America as a peaceful refuge from such ethnic violence.  How ironic that the media, largely controlled by Jews, encourages pogroms against the white descendants of those who so graciously allowed us to come here.  The media, through its silence and obfuscation, gives the green light to black thugs to continue their ongoing onslaught against other groups.
Of course the problem lies not only with the media.  The power-structure that encourages persecution against whites encompasses all government agencies, all large companies and corporations, all major educational institutions and all so called N.G.O.’s.  But those other racist organizations would collapse, like a house of cards, if only the media would do its job and inform the public of the actual truth.
Yes, the media is to blame for much of the bloodshed – but this does not absolve decent whites from defending themselves.  The immediate solution to black mob violence is not more basketball courts.  It is not more jobs and it is not better schools.  No.  The solution is to meet those mobs with machine guns, rocket launchers, flame throwers and armies of vicious dogs.  This is how, given the opportunity, my ancestors should have met the mobs of the pogroms.  This is how the Jews of Hebron in 1929 should have met the Arabs.  This is how the Cambodians should have dealt with the Khmer Rouge.  Only when the tattered, bleeding remnants of black mobs tell their friends and family “don’t mess with the white man (or the Asians or the Mexicans)!” will the pogroms cease.

This entry was posted in examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to violent black racism

  1. countenance says:

    Odds are there was really no “Aryan group” that “raised objections.” I’ll lay odds that the “Aryans” in question are ADL/SPLC/DOJ sock puppets.
    The police woman in Des Moines who said it was racial has been “re-assigned.” Cover-up, full steam ahead.

  2. Bay Area Guy says:

    How ironic that the media, largely controlled by Jews, encourages pogroms against the white descendants of those who so graciously allowed us to come here.
    I mean, you’d think they might have some gratitude.
    JAY, I don’t mean to kiss your rear end or give you a backhanded compliment, but if it weren’t for Jews like you and Paul Gottfried, there’s a good chance I would be a Jew hater.
    I mean, throughout my life, I noticed that white bashing liberals/civil rights integrationists/Cultural Marxists are disproportionately Jewish.
    1) This one Jewish guest speaker at my high school was a self-righteous, confrontational Civil Rights prick. Not to mention my white bashing government teacher.
    (although there was also a black loving gentile teacher)
    2) Perhaps it’s just me, but I couldn’t help but notice that so many of these white bashing or disingenuously pro-black/brown types are Jewish. (Tim Wise, Noel Ignatiev, the late Susan Sontag, the SPLC, the ADL)
    3) Adding on to that. I find it absolutely despicable the way organizations such as the SPLC and ADL posture are pro-black Civil Rights organizations. They like to think that as Jews, they can somehow relate to their oppression and that there therefore Jews help these groups from a moral perspective. All this “I feel your pain as a historicaly oppressed people” nonsense.
    That’s hogwash! If they truly cared so much about peoples’ suffering from a moral perspective, they would care about the oppression and plight of the Palestinians. The ADL not only doesn’t care, they even DEFEND Israeli war crimes. And the SPLC doesn’t even mention Israeli apartheid at all, even though it gives a report on anti-Muslim attitudes in Europe and the vicious anti-Semitism present at anti-Israel rallies on college campuses.
    As Malcolm X pointed out back in the 60s and as many white nationalists rightly point out today, Jews are not sincere in their Civil Rights posturing regarding blacks and browns. They promote open immigration, multiracialism, “tolerance,” etc, solely to undermine and distract whites. They essentially use non-white groups as a buffer.
    When blacks started to embrace black power/nationalism and demand true self-determination, economic power, and independence, Jews stopped supporting blacks. As long as blacks were these non-violent, “let us eat at the lunch counter” integrationists, Jews were content to use them as pawns.
    Just look at MLK! He was a ridiculous philo-Semite and Zionist who even claimed that opposition to Zionism is anti-Semitism in 1968. Abe Foxman even quotes MLK on Zionism in one of his books.
    MLK, the NAACP, and the integrationist Civil Rights Movement was in many was orchestrated by Jews. Jews owned MLK!
    Malcolm X could see through all the hypocrisy and fake Civil Rights posturing of Jewish pro-Civil Rights integrationists. They simply were not sincere about truly helping blacks.
    You see JAY, Israel more than anything else really highlights the hypocrisy of your average Jewish liberal (and by liberal, I don’t mean far leftist like Tim Wise). When they rail against the evil racist Arizona law, or give lip service to pro-diversity causes, I just know that they’re full of it, because they support the apartheid state of Israel. It’s really a matter of “ethnic exceptionalism for me, but not thee.”
    4) The neoconservative movement, which is fundamentally Jewish at its core, is responsible for much of our disastrous Middle Eastern foreign policy, including our unconditional and ridiculous amount of support we give to Israel, which is one of the main reasons why the Arab and Muslim world hates us so much.
    5) Of course, no need to even get into Hollywood. We all know they control Hollywood.
    6) Their role in orchestrating open borders (which ties in with point #3). They think that weakening the white majority and creating a U.S. with various squabbling minority groups (including whites) will make them safer.
    Newsflash to them: once your precious “people of color” take over, things won’t be so great for you. Let’s just say, hypothetically, that all the non-whites unite and become one big “people of color” coalition, which will take over around 2050 or so.
    a) Unlike with whites, Jews cannot blend in so easily with non-whites. No amount of nose jobs or anglicized names will do the trick.
    b) Unlike with whites, non-whites are not hindered by white gentile guilt, so they’ll have NO PROBLEM with attacking Jews or sticking it to them.
    c) If Jews think that they have a special pass with non-whites on account of being an oppressed group once upon a time, think again. Most non-whites lump Jews in with oppressive whites, and to the extent that they do notice their Jewishness, it’s not in a positive light. In fact, I’ve read somewhere that Hispanics are more anti-Semitic than other groups on average.
    I mean, Jews had a pretty damn good deal with us. We let them into this country, allowed them to enjoy enormous opportunities that they couldn’t enjoy back in Eastern Europe, and this is how they repay us?
    What kind of gratitude does Cultural Marxism, neoconservatism, open borders and Civil Rights posturing show?
    Anyway, that’s my rant.
    You see JAY, the reason why I asked you about the differences between religious and ethnic Jews is that I want to know WHO is actually responsible for all these negative Jewish inspired movements.
    Right now, my gut tells me its ethnic Jews who see themselves as a race that has to outcompete and undermine the white race.
    I mean, why can’t more Jews be like you?
    Can anyone help me out here?

  3. Bay Area Guy says:

    No. The solution is to meet those mobs with machine guns, rocket launchers, flame throwers and armies of vicious dogs. This is how, given the opportunity, my ancestors should have met the mobs of the pogroms. This is how the Jews of Hebron in 1929 should have met the Arabs. This is how the Cambodians should have dealt with the Khmer Rouge. Only when the tattered, bleeding remnants of black mobs tell their friends and family “don’t mess with the white man (or the Asians or the Mexicans)!” will the pogroms cease.
    Tell it!
    Whites need to learn that they CANNOT, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCE, try to appease or placate blacks. You give them an inch, they’ll take a mile.
    Based on my own personal experience here in the Bay Area, if there’s one thing I’ve learned about blacks, it’s that they respect toughness. If you stand your ground and let them know that you won’t take any crap, they respect that.
    They prey on white weaklings. When it comes to blacks, whites CANNOT
    1) Show any weakness
    2) Grovel
    3) Apologize/try to insist that they’re not racists. If an aggressive black screams “racist!” simply rub it in his face and say “yeah, I’m a racist! So what?”
    Of course, this is only for aggressive and rowdy blacks. This DOES NOT apply to decent blacks who don’t have the tude. I certainly am not in any way, shape or form, advocating that we be aggressive assholes towards random blacks.
    I also wouldn’t recommend taking this attitude in cities with large black populations such as Oakland (which is right next door to me).
    But all I know is that if a black person tries to give me crap in any majority white/Asian suburb (similar to that setting in Iowa, minus the Asians), then you’d better believe that I won’t take his nonsense.
    Machismo cultures, particularly blacks, respect toughness. They respect little else.

    • Erranter says:

      BAG, I’m starting to agree with you more and more. I was skeptical at first, but as they continue to kill us and beat us, I just can’t handle it any longer. We’ve got to take a stand, get militant, show them who’s boss.

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        You cannot show any weakness. AT ALL. They will pounce on it.
        They respect tough, assertive behavior. You’re right, we have to get militant and let them know that it’s no more Mr. Nice Guy.
        Yeah, we may have grown weak over the past 4 decades, but if they keep this crap up, then I’m afraid we’ll have to channel Russian whites (minus the extreme skinhead element). Now they don’t take crap from their minorities! Channeling a Han Chinese attitude with regard to minorities would also be good.
        By the way, where you live in Nevada (I think that’s where you said you live), do you even have to deal with any blacks?

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        Just to clarify, I’m not advocating a Russian or Chinese style authoritarian state.
        I’m just saying that neither of them take crap from minorities. And neither should we.

      • Erranter says:

        Um, well I’ve decided not to talk about where I live online anymore. Who knows how this is going to boil down when they start censoring the internet . . . Anyway, yeah, I do have to deal with them. Even at low population percentages, somehow they appear in larger numbers in city centers and downtown. Mostly it’s usually just seeing the bums.

      • Erranter says:

        It’s not like des moines has very many blacks. Only 8%. Here, apparently, they’re 3%, but god it seems like more than that.

      • Bay Area Guy says:

        Yeah, even in small numbers, they can be problematic.
        Still, much better than Oakland.

  4. Bay Area Guy says:

    Actually, screw it. Whites in Philly and in other large black cities need to take the same approach.
    Let them know that it’s no more Mr. PC, guilt-ridden, “aversive racism” Nice Guy!

  5. fred says:

    As I read your article I couldn’t help thinking of that poor woman in Seattle who had acid thrown in her face in a “random” attack. I’ve long since been fed up with the double standard demonstrated in how these inter racial attacks are handled by the police, courts and media.
    I recommend people educate themselves concerning the laws in their area and exercise their 2nd amendment rights to the fullest extent possible. If you’re placed in a situation in which self defense is necessary don’t hesitate. You’ll only be saving the life of the attacker’s next victim.

    • jewamongyou says:

      Actually it was that incident that inspired me to write this post. It actually happened in Vancouver, Washington and there were two women. One a while back and one more recent.

  6. Spirit of 1776 says:

    As a descendant of the Brewsters of the Mayflower…
    You’re welcome.
    (We’ve been waiting a long time to say that.)
    “How ironic that the media, largely controlled by Jews, encourages pogroms against the white descendants of those who so graciously allowed us to come here. “

  7. Californian says:

    It’s interesting how the race hustlers can throw up segregation era white on black violence (lynch mobs, race riots); yet since the 1960s, the vast majority of inter-racial violence in the USA has been black on white. Look at the Long Hot Summer ghetto riots of the 1960s; or inter-racial violent crime rates over the last several decades; or the Rodney King conflagration; or “Beat Whitey” day or whatever it is we might properly call such dust-ups.
    As you note, the establishment in the USA has done everything in its power to cover up this trend — effectively, a race war in which only one side seems to be fighting.
    The solution is to meet those mobs with machine guns, rocket launchers, flame throwers and armies of vicious dogs.
    This would make a heck of an episode of the evening news!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *