Sports discrimination

People in the Western world are so bombarded with messages of white guilt that, in a word-association game, the first word that would probably pop into most people’s minds when the word “discrimination” is mentioned, is “racial”.  From infancy to the grave, it is pounded into our heads that racial discrimination is bad.  Of course we are also told that there are other kinds of discrimination (all of which are also bad) such as sex-discrimination, gender-discrimination, religious discrimination and age-discrimination.  Every so often, politicians get it into their heads to pass a new law making yet another type of discrimination illegal.
Most people view discrimination negatively only when the trait in question has no obvious relevance to the job or promotion being sought.  One of the more obvious types of discrimination, which is not yet illegal but can clearly be unjust, is height-discrimination.  Short men arguably suffer far more than official “protected groups” in every area of life.  Though no law can force people to vote for shorter politicians, and no law can force women to date shorter men, at least this type of discrimination is talked about.
One form of discrimination that is hardly ever discussed is “sports-discrimination”.  Back in 1998, Jamie Schlabach wrote:

According to Gordon Allport (1954), it is necessary to categorize people into groups for adaptive functioning. Social categorization reduces the complexity of the social world. We use this idea to put people into categories like Miami University students or Proctor and Gamble employees. A very prominent category that many people belong to is that of a sports fan. Whether a Green Bay Packers fan, a Chicago Bulls fan, or a Miami Redhawk fan, a person fits into a category depending on who they cheer for. Categorizing people into groups by identifying some common attributes or characteristics reduces the amount of information to be dealt with (Hamilton, 1981) Such categorization can represent a sensible and useful strategy to reduce the complexity of the social world. But there are also some consequences that go along with this simplification strategy.
When a person identifies themselves with a group, they perceive themselves and the group members as different from other groups. A Packers fan may work with a Broncos fan, where both of them hold the same position, both love pizza, and both live in the same community. But the Packers fan will view the Bronco fan as being significantly different from himself. If another coworker is also a Packers fan, but lived on the other side of town and hated pizza, he would still be viewed as more similar to the Packers fan then the Broncos fan. A partial explanation for such in-group favoritism is provided by the social identity theory. Categorization can also create a basis for ethnocentrism, or the belief that one’s own group is superior to other groups. People will put themselves into the “in-group” and all other people are in the “out-group.” This leads in-group members to favor their group over the out-group and is called in-group, out-group bias (Devine, 1996). Sports fans of any kind favor their teams fans over the other team’s fans. The fans of the opposing team are not seen as friends or equals, they are the enemy. During a game, fans of each team do not socialize with the opposing fans. The seating arrangement during games is usually segregated, with, for example, the Packers fans on one side of the stadium and Broncos fans on the other. This separation contributes to favoritism of the in-group over the out-group.

Human nature hasn’t changed much since 1998 and, as a person who has worked for avid professional sports fans, I can attest to the fact that it can be a serious distraction, and a nuisance, in a work environment.  Far be it from me to encourage further anti-discrimination laws, but we can (and should) recognize a bad thing for what it is – without calling in the heavy hand of the law.
Most of us have heard of the proverbial “golfing buddy” phenomenon, where he who plays golf with the boss gets the promotion.  I think the reason we hear so much about golf, as opposed to other sports, is that golf is a traditionally higher status/higher income sport.  The promotions, and jobs, we see on T.V., read about in magazines and newspapers and see in movies, are high-paying jobs and high-stakes promotions.  What we don’t hear about is the millions of average-income workers who are passed over for promotion because their bosses are fans of a different team – or even because their bosses are sports fans in general, while the victim is not.  I say “victim” because ideally it is the best-qualified individual who gets the job or promotion.  This is the answer we would get if we were to ask any CEO about his company’s policy.  The employee who worked harder, is more honest, is more dependable and has more experience, is a victim if he is passed over in favor of another employee who happens to like the same sport as the boss.  Sure, he can quit and find another company (maybe), but this doesn’t change the fact that he was unjustly passed over.
What are the code-words for this type of discrimination?  “You don’t seem to have as much rapport with your co-workers”, “your communication skills aren’t as good”, “You don’t command as much respect” would be some possible examples.  The reality might be that the underlying reason for the denial is that the victim lacks common ground with others – due to the fact that he is not a fan of their sport or team.  But this is impossible to prove.  I would imagine that back in the days when it was still legal (but socially unacceptable) to discriminate on the basis of religion, gender or race, the same rationals would have been given.  As a matter of fact, it is legal to discriminate on the basis of race.  It is even required – when the victim is white.  It is also sometimes required to discriminate on the basis of gender – when the victim is male.  In either case, rarely will the victim be told that he was passed over because of his race or gender.  Instead, he will be told nothing at all – or one of the catch-alls I listed above.
There can be little doubt that many have learned to play golf with the intention of establishing a rapport with important people in order to advance their careers.  But how many people have pretended to be baseball, football or basketball fans – or fans of specific teams – in order to advance their careers?  Should those who do not be penalized*?
*Yes, I am aware that “life is not fair”.  I am simply bringing attention to one of life’s unfairnesses that is often overlooked.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Sports discrimination

  1. countenance says:

    Height “discrimination.” Someone tweeted a few days ago that the average corporate CEO is 6’2″, while only 4% of American men are that height or taller.

  2. Ha ha. Never go to a university with a prominent basketball team if you’re not into basketball and not good at pretending.
    I can pretend at some things but not others. I’m better at pretending to that blacks are on average as smart as whites than I am at pretending that blasketball is an interesting sport. I was, in graduate school, what the pimple-faced dork is in junior high school – the kid that noöne notices, with the name nobody can quite get right, who occasionally disturbs the tranquility of the classroom by participating in the discussion.
    There are very, very few adults left alive in the United States. It’s probably not worse here than anybody else. I mean, I doubt that many Latin Americans hit the mute button when the guy on TV screams “goal!” in that long drawn-out way.
    I despise planned “spontaneity” and manufactured “exuberance”. TV sports are disgusting and repellant.

  3. a random user name says:

    I bet the average CEO height is really 6’0 and the extra 2 inches is baloney.

  4. Steve the Hebe says:

    Agree with random user. Self reported height might be 6’2″, but most men exaggerate their height. 6’0″ or just a slight fraction over might be closer to reality.

  5. countenance says:

    Men exaggerate on inches? I would have never thought…

  6. irishsavant says:

    Jay – a bit of information for you. Every so often I get exasperated by some new episode of Jewish involvement in “white destruction” and tend to apply the blame to Jews in general. Whenever that happens I turn to you blog and start reading up posts and comments and regain my bearings. You’re doing great work. Please persist.

    • jewamongyou says:

      Thanks – and I do intend to persist.

    • countenance says:

      When I get those kinds of feelings, here’s what I do – I come to the realization that even if every Jew on Earth were as “bad” as certain people make them out to be, it wouldn’t mean anything if all other white people were united. Believe me, us gentiles can and do plenty of perfidous damage to ourselves.

    • a random user name says:

      Yes, this was how I originally found JAY. One of the important things that JAY has done is the translation of TAR, that shows that while Jews can appear to be united on the outside, there is much (and deadly) conflict on the inside. This is necessary knowledge for those who would attempt to figure out the why and how of why we are where we are.
      We have to bear in mind that it was a few scant Jews like Marx who sought to topple the existing power structures in white society, and succeeded in influencing the rest of their brethren over a period of decades or longer. Marx was a product of his time, as were the founders of the Frankfurt school.
      I question whether even those people responsible for the current mess would agree with it if they could be escorted through modern society and forced to look at everything they have created. I also don’t think it will be (or was) ultimately good for Jews, whether the backlash comes or not.
      One thing to bear in mind – while there were Jews such as Morgenthau who sought to destroy Germany through the Morgenthau plan after WWII victory – this plan was not executed. Germany was not destroyed, though the Allies had the means. With this magnanimity, I think that we as Gentiles will do best to recognize the favor for what it was and show that a future where white people have more rights need not be anti-Semitic.
      And just as Marxism and Cultural Marxism (PC) was built by a handful of individuals, so too will the counter-Marxist movement be built from a handful individuals and grow from there. It is an idea whose time has come. If real reform is championed by Jews and partial Jews, I don’t see how it can turn anti-Semitic.
      My impression is that if we look at races through the lens of game theory, white people play a game of GTFT (Generous Tit For Tat). We will put up with quite a bit, but push us too far and you will receive a “Tat” the likes of which you will never forget. The corollary to this is that if you can erase a negative “Tit” in time, there will be no reason for a corresponding “Tat”.

  7. Skepticism says:

    “Of the five stories, four of them involve blacks – three of them in positive ways.”
    I know this reply pertains to an earlier post, but I don’t have time to reply as often as I would like. Bummer – assuming any of you actually give a damn.
    I’ve often thought that one of the things black people either don’t know or don’t believe about white people is that most whites, even “racist” (again, whatever that means) whites, don’t dwell on race like black people do. Race simply doesn’t play as large a role in our identities as individuals. We often scratch our heads when we hear blacks accuse all white people who are involved in the tea party movement to be motivated by a racist dislike of Barack Obama.
    However, a minority of liberal whites DO seem to spend quite a bit of time thinking, talking and writing about black people. The above quote refers to one manifestation of this. I don’t know what motivates these liberals to do so, but I suspect that there’s a lot of internal conflict going on within their minds concerning racial matters. Any thoughts?

  8. Half Sigma says:

    My own research shoes that more self-reported height inflation occurs among men who are shorter than 6’0″.

  9. sestamibi says:

    These days I think a new form of discrimination has taken hold in corporate America (and especially in government at all levels): viewpoint discrimination. I went for an interview about two years ago for a job, the description for which I could have written to reflect my background and experience almost exactly.
    I never even heard from the company again, even though they paid for the 2000 mile interview trip. I’m guessing that one of the reasons was a previous volunteer stint as a low ranking GOP official. Well of course, if he’s a Republican, he couldn’t POSSIBLY hold the PC views on same sex marriage, environmental policy, etc. etc.
    I wonder how long this will take before it costs our economy big time–especially since Republicans are far smarter and far more productive than Dems in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *