Most of you have seen it. It goes like this:
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
“The Mantra”?
Damn, I hate the “mantra”. It’s silly that people copy and paste it as a cheap substitute for actually participating in discussions. Then when people (leftists) challenge them, they don’t actually back it up. I went through this on the SPLC blog not long ago.
Though I agree with Anna (the commenter on Unamusement Park) that a lot of people use the Mantra in the way she describes, I would also prefer organic, grass-fed, beef over the mass-produced, corn-fed, variety we find in grocery stores. However, if the latter were not available, a lot of people might go hungry. And like most people, I enjoy wholesome, home-cooked meals when they’re available. But sometimes pre-packaged food is all that’s available, or all I can afford, or all I have time for.
Not everybody has the time, or the ability, to engage in meaningful conversations about race online. Worse still, many pro-whites believe they have the ability to make eloquent points about the ongoing genocide against their people – but make themselves look like fools when they try; their posts are so full of spelling/grammatical errors that they make people unsympathetic to our cause.
I think it’s good that people have the option of a pre-packaged version of a pro-white argument. It’s better than silence, it’s better than making yourself look like an idiot, and it might make some people start to ask questions and think.
As for Anna’s point about not backing it up, denizens of leftist boards are not interested in meaningful debate anyway. If you do try to support the Mantra with facts and statistics, they won’t read them – and you’ll probably just get banned. Therefore, with leftists it’s better to use the “knock-out game” tactic. Strike them by surprise and strike them hard. Then run and go somewhere else rather than waste your time with them “debating”. The Mantra is as good a tool for this as any other. I would add, however, that it should be changed periodically; there probably shouldn’t be just one “Mantra”, but the concept is a good one.
I agree that, while not without its flaws, the mantra is a great introduction to race realism, a way for somnambulant whites to dip their toes into the water, so to speak. Obviously, diving straight into the amren side of things is not realistic; if one is truly asleep, as most whites are, the leap from no racial consciousness to acute racial consciousness would be like going from Michael Bay straight to Tarkovsky, which is to say, one’s head explodes before being able to absorb any insight.
Another thing I like about the mantra is its sobriety. Unlike other pro-white tracts, which are often shrill and abrasive in tone, and thus immediately label their disseminators as bitter losers, the mantra is matter-of-fact and dispassionate, suggesting love of whites rather than hatred of non-whites, which many “pro-white” sites (and it pains me to say this) often devolve into.
The key, I think, and the mantra is only one part of this overall strategy, is to spend more time accentuating the positives of white civilization, white values, white culture, and less time fixating on the negatives of others. Whites aren’t stupid: everyone is well aware of the dysfunctionality of many non-white groups. The issue isn’t ignorance of non-white flaws, it’s ignorance of the *causes* of these flaws. If we in the HBD-o-sphere can convince people that whites are a positive influence on culture and civilization overall, and not the vicious oppressors that we’ve been portrayed as, I believe things will begin to turn around.
In fact, the reason why I am not a white nationalist is because of the aforementioned negativity. All the hardcore racists I’ve met (and I mean actual racists, real hateful types) share one defining trait in common: their hatred of non-whites. They don’t even love whites! They just want to stick it to the blacks, or the jews, or whatever group they hold responsible for their impotence, or dead end job, or fat wife, or whatever. But when it comes to loving white culture, white accomplishments, literature, music, painting, etc., they are philistines no less than those they rail against!
I’m sorry for being long-winded, but I feel strongly, as I know you do, about this subject. Love of European values, not hatred of non-Europeans, is what built modern civilization. Let’s not forget that.
And by the way, as a long time lurker and first time commenter, I must add: I love the blog. Keep fighting the good fight.
Thanks!
I had not before come across “The Mantra” but it makes good sense, much more than anything that liberals and leftists have to say in dismissing opposition to genocide by mass immigration, as for example, the ridiculous claim, cited by seedofjapheth, that race is a social construct.
And it provides those who are not skillful in debate a rebuttal of one of the most obnoxious assertions of so many liberal and leftist immigration advocates; namely, that those who oppose the destruction through mass immigration of their own nation as a race, culture and religious tradition are necessarily haters of other races. This is in most cases not only an outrageous slander but a complete perversion of logic and morality: it is the insane assertion that refusal to acquiesce in the genocide of one’s own people is the moral equivalent to seeking the genocide of another people.
Which raises the question whether such slander could provide a basis for successful prosecution under the anti-racism laws of various Western countries.
Looks like someone’s thinking along the same lines as you: http://whiteinnovations.tumblr.com/
Thanks, that’s a great blog.
We all have mantras that we say in different ways that aren’t recognized as mantras. For example when the race deniers say that “race is a social construct” they are repeating a mantra that they have said many times before. The same is true with people who say “how are you doing” as a greeting. Much of your language is repeated mantras.
Bob Whitaker’s Mantra: Great for trolling left wing and neo-conservative egalitarian websites. For those of us in the know, we don’t need to read it over and over again. We’re the choir, we don’t need to be preached to.
My only problem with the mantra is that some of its intended targets don’t understand what “code word” means. Specifically, they hear “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” and they say, “hey, you’re saying that all white people are racist!”
It must be explained to them that we are not identifying “racist” with “white,” so that anti-“racist” means anti-“white.” We are observing that people who claim to be “against racism” are actually just against white people, which happens to be racist.
So when hit-and-run commenters, as Anna put it, “copy and paste it as a cheap substitute for actually participating in discussions” and “don’t actually back it up,” it often has the wrong effect.
Hmm… I never thought of that. But there’s nothing stopping people from improving the language so that it’s more effective.
The very reason they don’t understand exactly what it means also helps to force them to delve further into the issue. That’s if they’re interested at all, if they ain’t, nothing was going to move them anyway.
I think the target market the ‘mantra’ should be aimed at, is those people who are not fully ‘race realists’ yet but feel that something is very wrong with the current social climate. Even misunderstanding the mantra could lead to them becoming part of the pro-white side.
In my experience, no, they don’t delve further into anything. They say:
“So you’re saying all white people are racists? I don’t believe that. There are some decent white people who don’t believe [short list of true and therefore “racist” things about minorities]. Anti-racism is awesome!”
I re-worded the Mantra a bit for my own use. My version reads as follows:
I love it! Bookmarked.