How democracy is destroying the world

A lot of people believe that while democracy* isn’t perfect, it’s the best form of government we have. Perhaps this is true in the short term. In the short term we can rely on a majority of citizens to oppose tyranny and uphold the rule of law. But in the long term, the goodwill, and charitable spirit, that make it possible to begin with provide the seeds of the nation’s destruction.
Human stupidity (he sends me a lot of stuff) just sent me this article about Sweden, which reads in part:

Besides the explosive rise of crime and rapes the country faces cultural Islamization.The Swedish Social Democrats which are currently in opposition called for a Muslim Public Holiday,the police in Malmo is taught how to communicate in Arabic and they also learn about Muslim culture and tradition,the Department of Education has legalized the niqab (head to toe covering) for Muslim school girls,a school district in the Jonkoping municipality (South Sweden) is giving to Muslim kids special treatment,pork has been removed from some school menus and also there are up to 200 child marriages and 8500 forced marriages.According to Danish journalist Lars Hedegaard which was recently aquited by the Danish Supreme Court for “hate speech” stated that Sweden is on its way to become a Muslim-majority country by 2049…
So where the reaction from the media and the authorities in Sweden?Unfortunately they are the biggest problem in the country regardless of political option and they are continuing ruining Sweden with stupid statements which are transforming Sweden into an Islamic state,probably the first in Northern Europe.The media isn’t far behind because in various ways is trying to cover up the rapid Islamization of the country and there’s nothing to wonder with the success of the Swedish Democrats which are the fastest growing political party in the country.In the 2010 elections the Swedish Democrats got 20 seats in the Swedish Parliament (Riksdag) besides that the media and the political establishment hates them.Besides the success of the SD which will grow into a major political force in the years to come,the Islamization of Sweden continues and so does the insanity of the Swedish people who have learned apsolutely nothing in dealing with Islam which is continuing its silent conquest of the country.

There is no end in sight because, by opening the flood-gates to invaders, Sweden has set in motion a vicious cycle whose outcome is almost inevitable. Democracy is flawed because the masses, taken as a whole, are like children. Children must be forced to submit to painful medical treatments that can save their lives. They must be told to eat their vegetables, do their school-work, get to bed at a reasonable time, take a bath etc. So too must the instinctive kindness of the masses be controlled so that it doesn’t lead to the destruction of the nation.
In a system where large voting blocks can impose their own will on the host population, allowing immigration is a death-sentence. If a people insists upon democracy, then they must be made to understand that it is incompatible with immigration. A free, democratic, society is not sustainable in the long term with immigration. Tyranny will always result. According to the above article, Sweden’s pro-immigration policies date to 1975. If so, then it’s fate was already sealed in 1975. From that date onward, it exists on borrowed time. As more invaders arrive, the situation gets more dire. But, at the same time, each arriving invader makes a solution that much more politically impractical. Of course, as goes Sweden, so goes the rest of the Occident.
The only possible way out of this mess is for Sweden to descend into utter chaos and then have a dictator (a Swedish one) arise from the ashes. This dictator cannot be a kind one. He would have to quickly take control of the armed forces and police and then issue an ultimatum to the invaders (regardless of where they were born and even if they have one Swedish parent): Leave the country within a month or face internment or death. Families would be torn apart, children seized and deposited in God-forsaken lands to fend for themselves, sick and elderly deprived of health-care. Blood would flow in the streets and there would be an international outcry. But, if there is to be a Sweden at all, there is no other way – and the blame can be laid at the feet of those who allowed immigration to begin with. Removing a tumor is bloody business – so the best advice is to avoid implanting one in the first place.
*I include “republics” as democracies because pieces of paper, such as the Constitution, will be ignored whenever the masses deem it irrelevant. When they are told to deem it irrelevant.

This entry was posted in immigration/ Hispanics, Muslims, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to How democracy is destroying the world

  1. Probably the next Hitler says:

    Feeling optimistic today then…

  2. Apopkian says:

    Democracy always seemed to me a side effect of having a civilized population. In most cases a negative side effect. For some reason people keep confusing cause and effect. Democracy doesn’t civilize people.

  3. Annoyed says:

    Yes and when a population has been replaced to the point that they are a relative minority to the countries total population, they don’t have the ability to rectify these problems through democracy. Force is the only way.

  4. Yarilo says:

    It’s funny how other prosperous, livable and civilised countries like Japan have such little problem (as far as I know) with immigration. Maybe that’s because a) they make it very difficult to obtain full residency, and b) Japanese people generally won’t accept foreigners as their fellow citizens and will not make concessions for foreigners – you either completely assimilate into Japanese culture (and even then you’re not a shoe-in), or you go home.
    There’s nothing wrong with this way of thinking – it’s their country, why should they adapt to foreigners? If only the Swedish and other European masses had such a mind-set.

  5. Please mention the true sources. The links are from here
    I sent this because it is interesting food for thought, and I think you can comment on it.
    But I am not signing off on this, I am already espousing too many unpopular ideas to personally promote these ideas.

    • It’d be nice if the conservative men could just slip out of the arena and let the feminists and Muslims fight each other to a standstill. In fact I’d say the outlandish idea of leaving people alone and governing along traditional lines is a nice compromise between “beating the women (lightly)”* and “cutting up men”**.
      * from the Koran
      ** from the SCUM Manifesto

  6. Martub says:

    Human Stupidity has a point. In Sweden and in US and UK, there can be no hope of stemming the tide of “the underdeveloped” until men reassert cultural control within each country. Feminism may not be the only symbol of a dying nation, but it is the most profound.
    Martin B. Lewis

  7. JI says:

    So I guess the way it works is this: The majority are sensible people who vote for sensible things until eventually, for whatever reason, they vote for something that’s a bad idea such as bringing in unsensible people. Then those people add their numbers to the vote and more and more unsensible things are voted and passed, including bringing in yet more unsensible people. Finally, the unsensible far outnumber the sensible and it’s only a matter of time before they vote for something completely ridiculous and unsustainable.
    Seems inevitable to me.

    • Annoyed says:

      Ending Television and social agendas in the the education system would go a long way to fixing this, or at least had they never be present we wouldn’t be at this point.

  8. curious cousin says:

    What happens if a non-Swedish dictator emerges? You didn’t get to that part. It’s my favorite scenario.

  9. CanSpeccy says:

    The problem with democracy is that most people have no one to vote for.
    Mitt or Barak, America will still get millions more illegal immigrants against the wishes of the majority.
    Same problem in the UK. 70% are strongly opposed to mass immigration, that would be 80% in England where most immigrants settle, and close to 100% of English people in England.
    So what do they get? The treason of the Labor party followed by the treason of the Conservative-Liberal coalition led by Cameron who promised to “grip” the problem of immigration and just jacked up the rate to 590,000 in the first 9 months of 2011.
    But you’re right. Democracy is destroying the nations of Europe. By maintaining the fiction that people are getting what they voted for, democracy prevents the revolution that would otherwise send Tony Blair and David Cameron to the gallows.

  10. Gay State Girl says:

    Hey JAY
    My grandma is dying of Liver Cancer and the African health aide caused a fire in her house by putting aluminum foil in the microwave.

  11. Gay State Girl says:

    I guess that is the high price of cheap labor.

  12. Tom says:

    It is correct that democracy (especially representative democracy) is a destructive force. Actually, that’s the point of it. It’s designed to destroy nations through the it’s facilitation of minority groups to taking control of majority groups. It’s designed to be revolutionary. It always has. There was nothing wrong with Monarchy. It was the almost perfect system of government, so as long as the people could assure that it wasn’t infiltrated by people with interests inimical to their own (ie: foreigners). Why was it perfect? Becasue both the ruler and the people had a vested interests in one another’s survival. The King’s power was a direct result of the overwhelming and deeply felt consent of the people for him to rule. The people felt that way becasue he was a member of their tribe, and they knew that he needed them to survive as much as they needed him. They trusted him, more than any other could possibly be trusted, to look after the well being of the tribe. Despite thae various iniquities that we were taught existed under those ‘cruel’ monarchies of the past, by merit of deeply knowing the mechanisms of poltiics, I can make a very educated guess that it was extremely rare that Kings would pass any decree or policy that was wholly aganist the welfare of the majority under his rule. The impetus was to take care of the majority, which in turn reinforced the ruling power of the King. In the modern day, the closest hope/approximation that we have to monarchy is fascism.
    Democracy is merely a political placeholder and a facilitator of social change. That’s it. You cannot have a communist governemnt, as the Russian Communsit party found out very early on, without deep and lasting social change taking place first. This takes time and an enormous amount of forceful effort.
    It’s the human impulse to organize under tribal banner. Tribalism naturally breeds fascism or monarchy, as it is the most effective and consistent form of rule for a homogenous people. Democracy can (only) work in a homogenous society, and that is how it was introduced. However, it leaves many large gaps int the political firewall for infiltrators to do their work. That is it’s purpose. When it is done, we will have a society that has been perfectly molded for long term communist rule, assuming that all of the racist fascists have been eliminated or neutralized (they effectively have).
    There is no thrid way, as democracy purports to be. The world will either have a fascist (reasonably free culturally bright people ruled consentually by an aristocracy in a coutnry where everyone works to make the group stronger) or a communist governemnt (culturally impoverished heterogenous slaves ruled by and aristocracy that they know nothing about and which constantly works to make the group politics weaker). These are the strongest forms of government known to human kind, and democracy will not survive. It WILL naturally morph inot communism or else it will be eradicated by fascism. It can not resist either. Unfortunatley, I’m not hopeful about which we will end up with.

  13. irishsavant says:

    Yes, a solution, assuming an accommdating dictator can be found, will not be painless at all. No matter what direction events take the results will involve a lot of pain. As you say, the blame lies totally and unequivocally with those who set up, and encourage to this day, the mass population replacement project.

  14. Steve says:

    I’m just going to make the prediction that none of what you just suggested will happen, the world will further integrate culturally ethnically and economically with the advent of globalization, and nobody will take issue with increasing immigration and global camaraderie except savages like yourself.

    • jewamongyou says:

      You call me a “savage” for my opinions. I call others “savages” for their deeds. Deeds that are perpetrated daily upon unsuspecting victims of the multiculturalism you so tout.

  15. oogenhand says:

    “even if they have one Swedish parent”
    Differentiate between a Swedish father and a Swedish mother, and the solution is a lot closer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *