Some Oregonian tidbits

We can open any major newspaper, on any given day, and find examples of anti-white propaganda. I came across an Oregonian from January 10th and found these:

Alcohol, drugs not a factor in fatal stabbing

… The results show that Juventino Bermudez Arenas, 33, a tree farm worker never known to be violent, was not drunk or high when he walked into a convenience store and stabbed Parker Moore, 20, whom he’d never met.
The Nov. 15 stabbing has baffled investigators, who say they may never know why it happened. They say there was no confrontation between Moore and his killer…

Arenas was (he was killed by police) mestizo. Moore was white. The article never even brings up the possibility that this was a racially motivated killing.
The comic strip “Stone Soup” features an interracial marriage between, surprise surprise, a black man and a white woman. Don’t they ever get tired of pushing the same old thing over and over again? We get the impression that the author, Jan Eliot, believes this is some sort of ground-breaking, revolutionary, iconoclastic art statement. In fact, he is only rehashing the same meme we’ve had forced down our throats for decades – using every medium known to Mankind.
The opinion section includes a column, by Nicholas Kristof, titled “In the wake of a mindless attack, don’t give in to mindless Islamic caricaturing.” In this column, Kristof urges us to keep an open mind about Islam. After admitting that radical Islam is behind much of the violence, and intolerance, we see today, Kristof writes:

Terror incidents lead many Westerners to perceive Islam as inherently extremist, but I think that is too glib and simple-minded. Small numbers of terrorists make headlines, but they aren’t representative of a complex and diverse religion of 1.6 billion adherents. My Twitter feed Wednesday brimmed with Muslims denouncing the attack – and noting that fanatical Muslims damage the image of Muhammad far more than the most vituperative cartoons.
The vast majority of Muslims of course have nothing to do with the insanity of such attacks – except that they are disproportionately the victims of terrorists…

To a point, I agree. I recently posted a comment on Amren stating:

Most Muslims are peaceful (in that they won’t actually go out and murder people), but wherever there is a large population of Muslims, a certain proportion of them will be dangerously non-peaceful. There is no way to separate the wheat from the chaff. Peaceful Muslim parents may have dangerous offspring. Therefore, the only safe solution is for non-Muslim nations to see to it that large Muslim populations are not allowed to accumulate within their borders.

The vast majority of gun owners are also responsible, peace-loving, people. Yet Kristof is a proponent of gun-control. He is not against guns, much as I am not against Muslims. But just as he believes we should have laws to minimize the damage done by guns, in the hands of criminals, so do I believe we should have laws to minimize the dangers posed by Muslims – by carefully regulating (or stopping) the immigration of Muslims into Western countries. Can Kristof show us even one majority-Muslim country where civil liberties, including freedom of speech, are respected? Is it not obvious to him that large Muslim populations, in otherwise non-Muslim countries, tend to bring about an erosion of safety, well-being and liberty?
It’s a natural right to own guns; we all have the right to protect ourselves, our freedoms and those we love. But it is not a natural right for any particular religion, or ethnic group, to colonize the lands of others. Therefore, in the above analogy, Islam-control makes more sense than gun-control.

This entry was posted in examples of propaganda, guns and gun-control, immigration/ Hispanics, miscegenation, Muslims. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Some Oregonian tidbits

  1. Lon Spector says:

    Have you ever come up with a theory about WHY the white race is
    so Hell bent on committing suicide? Is it a case of ignorance of the
    facts? Denial? Media, educational, and cultural “brainwashing?”
    Dependence on political largess? Distraction? Inattention? Indifference?
    Wishful thinking? All of the above?
    Why should the white race want to genocide itself? Misplaced guilt?
    Simplistic thinking? A refusal to see that Human Nature is UNIVERSALLY
    wicked? That “minorities” can behave just as wickedly as “privildeged”
    white people?
    What are white people expected to “give” to minorites? Everything they
    “own?” Their lives? Even their bodies? Are whites morally obligated to
    give minorites EVERYTHING they want? And is there no statue of
    limitations for what whites owe to non-whites?
    Wherein comes this power that these institutions, media, educational,
    system, politics et. all have over whites?
    Is it the tatics of “influence” like Madison Avenue that controls the white
    race? Techniques outlined in the book “Influence,” by Robert Caldini?
    Or “Media Sexploytation,” by the late Wilson Bryan Key?
    We know that the media has the ability to persuade us to commit SLOW
    suicide, with drugs and junk food. The meanace seems at arm’s length.
    is that how they do it?

    • Rhi says:

      It’s a complex process of dumbification I think. Education is nothing but lip service to the victims of the past, present is distorted, future is too uncertain, most people too busy with their own demons or with work, trying to keep up with this or that impossible ideal and everyone feels marginalized in some way or another and then emotionally latches on to so called “eternal victims”. Also, human complacency has done its part as well. Liberals are even using “white supremacy” inverted to shame white people for… well, being white. It’s a circus freak show.
      The government governs human minds by listening to their lobbies that have deep pockets and will keep the left and the right in power for as long as possible. Nothing in the media is a reflection of actual reality as complex as it is. Young people escape into fantasy worlds. Older people escape into anti-depression pill bottles.
      At the end of the day you have nothing but a self-decaying society, but if you scream racism loud enough and don’t hold people to individual responsibility things will fall from the sky or from white guilt’s pockets until the pocket is handed as well.

  2. Steve says:

    Just a observation on the vocabulary used as I read these articles and comments on this blog. I am not “white”. I am a variation of colors that ranges from a ruddy reddish to tan to light brown (depending on how much time I spend in the sun). If we are talking race then wouldn’t Caucasian be a better descriptive term? We don’t call Asian people “yellow” do we? No we refer to them as Asians. The term “black” doesn’t really fit the African race either, since there is a broad range of colors that this racial term applies to. Maybe it’s just convenient to use these very polarizing terms, but this inconsistency has always been a pet peeve of mine, falling under the category of language laziness.
    That said, I do enjoy reading these articles and comments and my comment has nothing to do with validating or invalidating what is written here. It is all very interesting and gives me a lot to ponder. Keep those articles coming, they are so much more fun to read than most popular news posts out there.

    • jewamongyou says:

      “Caucasian” includes most of the people of India, Pakistan and the Middle East – but most of those people are not “white.” Since “white” and “Caucasian” are not synonymous, I use the (admittedly sloppy) term “white.” It’s understood that white people do not have actual white skin, and that black people don’t have actual black skin, but it’s a good-enough approximation.
      The term “Negro” would be fine for black Africans. We can get away with using it online, but in real life, it’s (for some odd reason) considered offensive by many people.

  3. Lon Spector says:

    So, it’s simply a case of inevitable, slow erosion that nothing can be
    done about, like witnessing a terminal cancer patient die. Like the
    band on the deck of the Titanic playing as the ship begins to flounder.
    Or just maybe Jesus Christ and God The Father, might chose to
    intervine, and cause spiritual revival.
    The Soviet Union dissapeared in the wink of an eye. The “Arab Spring”
    came out of nowhere. It might just be that God has a LONG RANGE
    plan for the Western world. Until He does implement this plan, we’re
    going to have to hear more news stories about 24 year old math teachers
    raped and murdered in their own suburban schools with 3 foot tree
    branches shoved up their vagina’s.

  4. Stan D Mute says:

    Your argument against Muslims, as aliens with violently hostile component contained therein, will fail for reasons you should know well. Jews now find themselves caught between the proverbial Rock and Hard Place. Jews have a great deal to do with the Narrative in the West. Their disproportionate (wildly disproportionate in many cases) representation in media, education, law, and politics ensures their voice will be heard. And Jews, above all, can not bring themselves to lobby for expulsion of aliens from Western nations. Their fear of their own expulsion is simply too deeply imbedded in their culture. I’d guess you can easily confirm this for yourself by speaking with some Rabbis and elders in Jewish communities. Ask them what they think about giving the boot to all Muslims in France, Germany, or America.
    So Jews must find themselves in the precarious position of advocating for the toleration and acceptance of alien peoples in the West even though that includes the only real group that wishes to see Jews eradicated from the face of the earth. Your argument that Muslims hide within a subset hell-bent on destruction of the host Nation can just too easily be applies to Jews as well. A quick visit to any of the anti-Jew websites will confirm that there are a number of Jews arguably doing much more harm to the West than any Muslim terrorist. I’d rather have my kid killed in a bombing than tortured ruthlessly every single day in a negro dominated school. And Jews have had a much too large role in changing (arguably destroying) the West’s culture to walk it back and say, “But the native (Americans, French, Germans, etc) were just as active in forcing unwanted integration, hate crime laws, lenient sentencing, school bussing, etc.” That’s the risk Jews took on when they (1) became active in fighting to change the culture of the West and (2) chose to identify themselves as Jews rather than as natives (again American, German, whatever). Further, Jews themselves have quite a history of terrorist actions in the 20th Century so you may be sure that Jews calling for expulsion of Muslim terrorists will be called hypocrites immediately.
    I think the West is stuck with the Muslims and their terrorism until they decide to stop. The only alternative is pure nationalism and that just won’t happen. If Americans can be forced to accept the chaos, violence, and incompetence that negroes impose, the rest of the West will accept the violence of the Muslims.

    • M.L. says:

      I don’t think the reason Jews are loathe to lobby for the expulsion of aliens from Western nations because they fear they too may then be expelled. I think they actually want those aliens in Western nations. They think diluting the historic white majorities makes them safer, and also represents payback for centuries of anti-Jewishism in Europe (centuries of anti-Jewishism in Muslim lands generally conveniently forgotten or said to have been a kinder, gentler persecution, etc.).
      The ideal scenario for most Jews would be a world in which Jews could choose to live either in a monocultural Jewish ethnostate in Israel, or in one of the formally white majority Western nations transformed into balkanized multicultural entities with a majority of mutually unassimilable races and ethnic groups. Hence their enthusiasm for open borders, multiculturalism and massive legal and illegal third world immigration for Europe, the US, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia while simultaneously promoting secure borders for a monocultural Jewish ethnostate in Israel.
      This of course all naively presupposes that non-whites would somehow be inherently less inclined to anti-Jewishism (in reality blacks, Hispanics, and Asians are generally much more anti-Jewish than whites).
      The whiteness studies movement (a movement overwhelmingly created and led by Jewish academics) isn’t even content to simply increase the number of non-whites via legal and illegal immigration; they also actively seek to persuade ethnic whites to essentially ‘secede’ from the white race by aggressively promoting the revisionist fiction that they weren’t originally considered white, were hated by the wily ‘creators of whiteness (the diabolical, pasty faced Anglo-Saxons) and should stop identifying as such.
      In recent years there’s been a marked increase in Jews openly distancing themselves from white identity, usually (and not surprisingly) relying on standard whiteness studies arguments about how they were never really white but rather were compelled to ‘become white’ by the diabolical white power structure. As the white populations shrink in the US, Europe and elsewhere, you can expect to hear more and more Jews declaring “We’re not wbite!”

  5. Lon Spector says:

    Stan, I’d like to ask you a question if you should happen to see this
    posting. Anyone else can answer it as well.
    Suppose we could have a government that WN’s would like. Say, the
    election of David Duke for President. Would you allow “good” Jews
    safe passage out of this country to Israel? Or, do you think ALL Jews
    should be eliminated? There is a difference of opinion on this, needless
    to say. Personally, I think that Jewamongyou, Brother Nethinel, and Henry
    Markow HAVE earned the right of “safe passage.” Even Hitler let some
    Jews go. He even declared one Jew an Aryan!

    • Nate says:

      Lon, I happen to agree with much to all of what Stan said. That being said, with this comment/question, “Would you allow “good” Jews
      safe passage out of this country to Israel? Or, do you think ALL Jews
      should be eliminated?”, are suggesting that mass extermination of jews just for being jews is something you might favor?

  6. Lon Spector says:

    I don’t favor it. But those that believe that the Jews are a race do.
    Wasn’t Nazism the first time in history when Jews were considered a
    sub-human RACE? Even “conversions” were not accepted.
    Islam does accept conversions from EVERYONE. That’s why it might win.
    Adam Gadone was an American Jew who became a Muslim propagandist.

    • Nate says:

      Thank you for the clarification. Although Jewry has some ethic components to it, I think the “jews as a race” theory ultimately breaks down and doesn’t make sense. Regardless, as I said, I believe in much of what Stan has to say. Unfortunately, tons of people who identify as “white nationalists” frequently utter implicit or explicit messages about exterminating Jews. This has been my experience in dealing with many “white nationalists”. As long as this kind of thing continues, I will be very surprised to see “white nationalism” become anything more than a fringe movement full of losers.

  7. Jagdflieger says:

    Somewhat off topic but I wanted to share this with everyone here in case they hadn’t seen it yet. Two blacks are convicted of murdering two whites and while the victims’ families make their tearful statements expressing their forgiveness the defendants openly express their contempt:
    Rather than apologize to the families one of the killers had this to say:
    “I’d like to say sorry to the families of Aiyanna Jones, Michael Brown, Eric Garner. And I want to apologize to them for not being able to get justice for their loved ones who was murdered in cold blood – and in respect for the peaceful protest, I want to say hands up don’t shoot. Black lives matter – that’s it your honor.”
    This incident speaks volumes about the state of race relations between blacks and whites today as blacks can openly express their hatred, resentment and disinterest towards whites and whites aren’t even aware of it while they pathetically cling to being racially color blind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *