Anti-body-shaming or Sharia?

By now, you’ve probably all read about Islam’s new London mayor’s ban on “body-shaming” ads on public transport. Ostensibly, this ban is intended to protect women from being shamed.

Khan announced:

“As the father of two teenage girls, I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies. It is high time it came to an end.

“Nobody should feel pressurised, while they travel on the Tube or bus, into unrealistic expectations surrounding their bodies and I want to send a clear message to the advertising industry about this.”

We are to believe that Khan’s religion has nothing to do with it. But if his intention is to introduce Sharia by stealth, what better way to start than by promoting issues with which Muslims and feminists share common ground?

Most corporate media outlets have ignored any possible Islamic motivation behind this law. But David Li, of the New York Post, writes:

London Mayor Sadiq Khan announced a ban on body-shaming ads on public transit, a moved praised by gender equality groups — but blasted by some who said it’s the start of the “Islamification” of the city by its first Muslim mayor…

But some on social media said the decision was “as per Sharia law,” saying Khan was “using feminist talking points to enact Sharia policy” and “turning London into a Muslim city,” according to RT.

Added Sharene Kirchler to the BBC’s Facebook page:

“What happened to free speech? What happened to not being offended by everything. Why is it a matter of state to decide when something so subjective is to be allowed or not?”

According to Snopes, the initiative came as a response to “massive public outcry” and petition that garnered over 70,000 signatures. The main piece of evidence, cited by Snopes, is the statement (quoted above) by the mayor himself. They also point out that only a small fraction of London advertisements will be affected. Of course, Snopes has no way of ascertaining the true motivation behind Khan’s initiative. Khan could be lying, and the fact most of London’s advertisements aren’t (yet) affected means nothing; even stealth Sharia must start somewhere.

I don’t claim to know Khan’s true motivation, but I’m pretty good at spotting propaganda. The Miami Herald has a slide show about this new law. Here’s one of the slides:


Notice it uses the fact that “Germany recently banned ads in response to a rise in the number of sexual assault cases within the country.” Apparently, the Herald doesn’t expect its readers to actually click on the hyperlinks. The hyperlink for “Germany recently banned ads” clearly shows that the ban was in response to attacks by Muslim men.

Let’s rephrase that, just to show how perverse it really is:

Critics of the ban say that it forces Khan’s Muslim beliefs on everyone, but Germany recently did the same in response to attacks by Muslim men on its women.

As for France, Israel, Italy and Spain, they didn’t exactly “enact similar measures.” Rather, according to the New York Times, they “enacted policies aimed at preventing models with stick-thin bodies from working in the industry.” Obviously, the model in question is not “stick-thin,” nor do such policies amount to bans on “body-shaming” on public transport.

So shame on the New York Times for misleading its readers, and shame on the Miami Herald for taking such propaganda to even lower levels.

Personally, I agree with the spirit of the policies of France, Israel, Italy and Spain; anorexics should not be held up as the female ideal. However, it’s hard for me to sympathize with overweight people when I see their atrocious eating habits every day. Some people are overweight through no fault of their own, but too many are that way due to their own bad habits and lack of discipline. The Protein World model has a very healthy-looking body, and women should definitely be encouraged to try to emulate her. By the same token, men should be encouraged to emulate svelte male models too.

Incidentally, where’s the outcry over buff male models being shown in public?


This entry was posted in examples of propaganda, human sexuality and morality, Muslims and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Anti-body-shaming or Sharia?

  1. bob sykes says:

    These women are plainly not anorexic.

  2. Tawger says:

    >Incidentally, where’s the outcry over buff male models being shown in public?

    The feminist tactic is to say they’re all “Male Power Fantasies.” and so they don’t count or women have it worse somehow.

    See here:

  3. Pingback: Outliers (#11)

  4. wsigma says:

    Everything politics does great if it always goes away from greatness. Away from standards. Always pro-ugliness, anti-White. This convergence of interests from extreme left feminists with woman-raping Islam should be mocked, scorned and spat on.

  5. Robert Marchenoir says:

    Sadiq Khan has just taken opportunity of the Brexit vote to claim extra powers on how tax money is spent in London (this, in the wake of the silly buzz about Londoners splitting from the UK because they voted Remain). From the day he was elected, I have had a very bad feeling about this man. He is a jihadist without a gun, mark my words.

  6. Reblogged this on ETC., ETC., & ETC. and commented:
    We are to believe that Khan’s religion has nothing to do with it. But if his intention is to introduce Sharia by stealth, what better way to start than by promoting issues with which Muslims and feminists share common ground?

  7. Robert Marchenoir says:

    Listen carefully to Sadiq Kahn here :

    He is claiming autonomy for London (while “joking” that he does not want independance). He’s not asking nicely ; he “demands” it.

    This is exactly the strategy openly laid out 20 or 30 years ago by islamists in France in order to conquer Europe : take root in a number of cities, grow, multiply, infiltrate the structures of power, and then secede from the rest of the country. Do that in as many cities as possible across the land. And then, seize the country itself. They said it. They don’t even pretend to hide.

    This man is Hitler. Mark my words. His swearing-in in a London cathedral was chilling. His first words were : “My name is Sadiq Khan” (as if anybody had a doubt about that), “and I’m the mayor of London” (he then paused to let that sink down.) He’s a ruthless politician and will be a Trojan Horse for islam.

    Did I show you this picture of his Pakistani chums rejoincing about his election ?

    “Heartiest congratulations to Sadiq Khan, first Pakistani mayor of London, who defeated millionaire Jew Zac Goldsmith”. No need to be politically correct back home, eh ?

    Listen to Khan’s inauguration speech. Don’t miss the body language. Look at who he put center stage. A black “Baroness”, and a children choir which is one hundred percent Judenrein. When the Queen of England has a children choir at an official event at Buckingham, she takes care that it is “diverse”, with half the children white and half various hues of brown and black. The children choir at the swearing-in of Sadiq Khan (in a Christian cathedral, for God’s sake !) was 100 % black and brown. Not a single white face. They are not even pretending any more. If you don’t get the message, you’re deaf and dumb.

  8. Pingback: Linkage: 12 July, 2016 #TheTriggering ]*[ The Cynical Libertarian Society

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *