The use of force

I love it when fellow Jews visit this blog, and show their support for the beleaguered white race. On that note, I suppose this is a good time to share a video (sent to me by my friend Diversity Chronicle) by my favorite rabbi, Rabbi David bar-Hayim:

Commenting on my previous post, “Ratcheting up Sensitivity,” a reader by the name of “370H55V” writes:

… The Left has increasingly made it clear that they believe that those of us who hold the beliefs we do have no right to exist, and have made themselves the judges, and in some cases, executioners. Unless we realize that this is an existential threat to thousands of ordinary citizens just trying to live their lives unmolested (just the other day I read about a German real estate agent brutally assaulted by Antifa storm troopers in her own home), we will be living our lives in fear.

The only remedy to this is to respond as proportionately with violence as necessary. Let them know that if the First Amendment is going to be trashed, then WE will tell YOU what you can say and think, and back it up by force and intimidation.

And by the way, I’m a fellow Tribesman. I love this blog!

Yes folks, “370H55V” is a Jewish name. Deep in my heart, I’ve always acknowledged 370H55V’s point. No group can survive through endless pacifism, when faced with relentless aggression; to do so would doom us to the fate of the Moriori. A glance at history shows that the forces of the Left are no less brutal than the Maori. When I say “history,” I’m not only referring to Stalin or the Holodomor genocide. I’m also referring to events that are transpiring right now, in the 21st century.

Writing for American Greatness, Angelo Codevilla says:

For the past half century, America’s political history has been driven by the Democratic Party’s effort to fire up these constituencies by denigrating the rest of America. As elements of cynical calculation melded into self-images of righteous entitlement to rule inferiors, the boundaries between the party and the constituencies’ most radical parts have eroded.

In the 21st century’s second decade, explicit statements by the party’s principal figures—President Obama, Hillary Clinton, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to name only a few—have led their epigones in power as well as millions of followers to think and act as if conservatives were simply on a lower level of humanity, and should have their faces rubbed in their own inferiority. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo simply declared that pro-lifers and other conservatives have no place in his state.

As the media amplified and cheered such guidance from on high, it would be surprising if many ordinary followers have not concluded that harassing if not harming conservatives in restaurants, airports, as well as in their public functions is not just permissible but praiseworthy, and if thousands of persons who exercise power over cities, towns and schools have not concluded that facilitating such harassment and harm is their duty.

Police in leftist jurisdictions have stood aside as violent groups disrupted the 2016 Republican presidential campaign and the 2017 presidential inauguration in Washington, D.C., as racial mobs have ravaged malls and shut down major roads, as conservatives have been attacked physically as they tried to speak or merely observed. The media have basically justified the violence. The other side has done nothing comparable—yet.

But since the ruling class’s condemnations of conservatives as racists, environmental criminals, and would-be terrorists are becoming well-nigh universal, the probability of deadly attacks on conservatives, of intolerable convictions or absolutions, and assassinations, rises to certainty. So does corresponding demand for protection and revenge.

The above article was also published at There have been many instances where the courts have shown their bias by refusing to adequately punish leftist perpetrators of violence. For example, Professor Eric Clanton, who struck a protester with a bike lock, causing severe injury, got no jail time. Antifa rioters are regularly given free reign, and no punishment for their violations of the law, in my own city; police are ordered to stand by and do nothing.

Against this backdrop, we are morally justified in striking back in kind. Let there be no doubt about it. Victims of violence are morally justified in also using violence.

The problem is that Cultural Marxists own practically all of the schools and the media. Therefore, it’s not surprising that most young people are leftist; it’s all they know. In a physical fight, young people are usually going to win against hoary pensioners. Among young people, even if we count only WHITE young people, pro-whites/conservatives are vastly outnumbered.

Add to this the fact that the courts, and police, are biased against us, and this is not a battle we can currently win. Even in cases where we somehow DO win, the media will lie, and use such incidents against us.

There are many young conservatives, and pro-whites, but most of them have too much to lose. If doxed, they will not be eligible for higher education, a government job, or even a private job with most companies. I’ve met some of these people myself, here in Portland. They know the score, but they must remain silent. They cannot join a brawl in defense of those on the right. Some day, with luck, some of them will retire and be more outspoken.

We can take comfort in the fact that many young leftist thugs will eventually grow up and see the light. There will come a time when THEY are the hoary pensioners trying to defend themselves from violent black and mestizo hoodlums. By then, the US will mostly resemble Brazil demographically.

In light of the above, I believe that the best course of action, in most circumstances, is to fight for freedom of speech on campuses and in the media. If we make progress on this front, then Cultural Marxists will no longer hold a monopoly on the youth. At that point, when push comes to shove, we can defend ourselves with violence when threatened or attacked.

What happens when we win?

I’ve been reading Greg Johnson’s “The White Nationalist Manifesto.” I highly recommend it, though I think there are a few improvements that could be made.

Johnson writes (pg. 96):

Moreover, within the lifetimes of many present-day Americans, the kinds of laws and policies favored by White Nationalists actually existed, from immigration laws designed to preserve the white majority, anti-miscegenation laws to maintain racial purity, eugenics laws to improve future generations, and even mass deportations of Mexican invaders from border states. These are not utopian pipe dreams. They have already happened. Indeed, some of these laws even seem too radical for present-day White Nationalists.

Thus the first step to creating a White Nationalist America is to dust off these laws and policies and implement them once again.

Personally, I’ve long held that anti-miscegenation laws would be unnecessary, if only we could do away with the relentless PRO-miscegenation propaganda rained upon us by the hostile elite, and protect our borders.

If a white-nationalist state ever arises, I don’t think a Jew should be in charge… but, as a thought-experiment, let’s say that I was appointed king. I would make sure that images of healthy, happy, and fertile, white families dominated the billboards, commercials, government literature and signage. This is the sort of thing that should be promoted in a white ethnostate. If you visit black Africa, you’ll see images of healthy, happy, and fertile black families depicted everywhere; black Africans are not bombarded with miscegenation propaganda – and neither should whites.

Along with sensible immigration policies, and healthy doses of ethnic pride in schools, anti-miscegenation laws should not be necessary. I don’t think the State should dictate who we can marry – but it should definitely dictate who can live within its boundaries.

Thus, a white person who brings home a non-white spouse should not be thrown in jail. Rather, he should be deported to another country – humanely. Israel should be doing the same thing with Jews who choose non-Jewish spouses. Let them live elsewhere; Israel is supposed to be a JEWISH state. There will be plenty of multi-ethnic states that would welcome them.

But speaking in general terms, should a white ethnostate use force against its enemies? We’ve seen what such enemies are capable of. We’ve watched them use violence against us with impunity, and suffer few consequences. If there was any doubt, in the past, about the true nature of Cultural Marxism, there are no doubts now; it has revealed its true nature. Any, and all, measures should be used to prevent Cultural Marxism from rearing its ugly head again. Observe how the Cultural Marxists react any time Nazism rears its ugly head. This is how we should react to Cultural Marxism.

I’ll conclude with a revealing photo from Portland. I guarantee that this graffiti would have been erased within a few hours had it said “It’s Okay to be White.” Apparently, where Antifa reigns, it’s “Okay to be Communist.”


This entry was posted in activism, freedom of speech issues, Jewish stuff and Israel, miscegenation, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The use of force

  1. The Gentle Grizzly says:

    I’m white, and a nationalist. I favor a return to the old laws and customs. But, I am Jewish at least by heritage; I walked away from the American Jewish culture decades ago; I found it repugnant. Being brought up in the Reform sect can do that to one.

    I’d LOVE to live in a white, nationalist country again, but I need to ask this of you, JAY: do you, for two seconds, think that white, nationalist Jews would even be welcome?

    Our non-Jewish friends and neighbors can’t help but notice NADLER. WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ. SCHIFF. FEINSTEIN. Herr Doktor Kissinger, who prolonged a war, and helped Nixon sell us out to the Red Chinese. Streisand. Epstein. Weinstein. The list goes on. They don’t remember the Salks, Sabins, Gershwins, or Bernsteins.

    Wouldn’t our friends and neighbors – rightfully I might add – question the wisdom of allowing Jews at all in their newly-founded, or newly-resurrected nation? If they did, I’d not blame them.

    What are your thoughts? Thanks very much.

    • jewamongyou says:

      It’s always good to hear from you old pal. As for your question, it’s something I’ve indeed pondered. My answer is this: If they don’t accept us, and want us to leave, then we’ll have to leave. It would be unfortunate for us, but they would be well within their rights. Either way, I believe in doing the right thing, and right now, that means fighting for white rights. This is obvious to me.

      • I’ve no idea where I could go. JAY. Every day I regret declaring a religious preference when I joined the Navy. This means I Am In The Computer, so, easily found. I know of NO way to assure whites who are nationalists that I am one of them.

        If I had my d’ruthers I’d be living in one of the easter European countries where they have not accepted the muslim invasion or the social diktats of the Brussels oligarchs. Sadly, those very countries generally despise us as well.

        I’m glad I’m old.

  2. 370H55V says:

    An old Jewish name that needs to be read upside down 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *