Steven Tucker just wrote an excellent piece on The Great Replacement “Theory.” I strongly recommend reading it in its entirety.
In a nutshell, Tucker provides some background information about the recent shooting of three random Kurds in Paris by William Malet. It turns out (surprise!) that Malet didn’t just wake up one morning, get bored, and think to himself, “I’m bored; I think I’ll go out and kill me some ragheads!”
Tucker elaborates:
In 2016, three young men of “North African heritage” (media-speak for “Muslim criminals”) had broken into his home. He had confronted them with a kitchen knife—rather than simply bending over and eagerly asking if they’d like to rape him, too, as contemporary polite liberal etiquette now recommends—then was sentenced to twelve months in prison for his unacceptable show of resistance. Worse, two of the injured burglars later sued him for €30,000 in damages, thereby literally making victims out of criminals and criminals out of victims.
Regarding the Great Replacement “Theory,” Tucker explains:
Data shows the Great Replacement really is occurring—that’s why saying so obviously now needs to be threatened with legal censorship—but the main factors behind it are probably not some implausible, planet-spanning, deliberate Jewish-globalist plot, as a hard-core minority of actual conspiracists maintain, but impersonal socioeconomic forces such as panda-like low white birth rates and the resultant Western demand for cheap, replacement immigrant labor from abroad.
I think Tucker could have, and should have, gone a bit further. A casual reader might conclude that there’s a range of opinions, among conservatives and White-advocates, regarding the nature of The Great Replacement, but not so much among those who actually perpetrate it.
This is not the case, and it cannot be the case. There are a great many people, in various levels of hierarchy, who orchestrate The Great Replacement; they are not a monolithic group. Many of them do fall under the category that Tucker describes, looking after their own short-term monetary interests.
Do they ALL fall into this category? Of course not. Some of them are, without doubt, working deliberately toward the destruction of White communities in the West. There are several good articles on American Renaissance documenting this… and, of course, there’s Biden publicly stating that The Great Replacement is something to be proud of:
I’ve used the above clip several times in my debates with replacement-denialists. It ends the debate every time; those leftists are the same people who constantly ridicule Whites who feel pride in their race. “You should only feel pride for something you have actually DONE,” they shriek. How are they to respond when their president says he’s proud of The Great Replacement?
In conclusion, there is a spectrum both within those who oppose The Great Replacement, and those who support it. Replacement-denialists lie by omission when they recognize only a small group of replacement opponents, and replacement opponents err when they recognize only the replacement-perpetrators who are driven by money; some are driven by politics or ideology.