Reading the pro-Palestinian arguments on various media, we see a recurrent theme:
Given Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinians, especially during recent years of Netanyahu’s term, the Hamas attacks were understandable, if not justified. For example:
@ArchPhantom94 Given the decades long Israeli occupation of Palestinians, what should the Palestinian response have been to ensure that the anti-Palestinian detractors would consider it as justifiable? Please provide all relevant logic and details metric.
What are the accusations against Israel? Amnesty International, which is curiously silent about the ongoing destruction of Native European communities in their home lands, is quick to condemn Israel for its abuse of Palestinians:
An Israeli court has given the go-ahead for the forced eviction of 500 Palestinian Bedouins in the Negev/Naqab region, highlighting the deep discrimination that Palestinian citizens of Israel face under apartheid, Amnesty International said today. In a judgment issued on 27 July, the Beer’sheva Magistrate’s Court said residents of the village of Ras Jrabah must leave their homes, and vacate the lands where their families have lived for decades, by March 2024. They must also pay a fine of 117,000 NIS (approximately 31,700 USD) to cover legal expenses.
This seems eerily similar to the way European governments are removing Native Europeans from their apartments, and replacing them with migrants, or how government policies are encouraging hotels and nursing homes to replace downtrodden American homeless with migrants. These policies disproportionately affect White people, and they’re being implemented all over Western Europe and America. Additionally, the influx of hordes of military-aged men, into small communities, makes life too dangerous for many Native Europeans, especially women and girls – who must alter their behavior in order to stay safe.
The European Union, and its vassal states, have invited millions of young men, from backward countries, into Europe. The predictable result has been an ongoing wave of rapes against Native European women and girls. It’s unreasonable to claim that the elites were somehow unaware of this. Punishment for the migrant rapists has been all but nonexistent, laughable if it weren’t so tragic. We can only conclude that the EU, and its vassal states, are using rape-by-proxy as a weapon of war against Europe’s native populations. They’ve expressed a desire for more mixed-race people in Europe and rape is one means toward that end.
Even as this onslaught goes on, the powers-that-be in Europe publish anti-White propaganda to the public. For example, here. European institutions actively discriminate against Native Europeans in hiring. For example, here. European governments are severely curtailing freedom of speech, so that Native Europeans risk prison and fines if they dare speak out. For example, here. European governments belittle, and degrade, Native European history and its heroes. For example, here. Europe and America have a two-tiered “justice system,” with harsher penalties for Whites. For example, here and here.
There is no evidence that Israel has been using rape as a weapon of war against Palestinians, nor are Palestinians targeted for replacement in all their native lands; there will always be plenty of them in Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. In these regards, Native Europeans have suffered more than Palestinians.
Using the logic of the pro-Palestinian crowd, would it be justified for Native Europeans to go on rape and slaughter rampages? If Native Europeans lashed out against decades of genocidal policies, by implementing a “Final Solution” upon the black and brown hordes that have descended upon Europe, would we see huge protests in their defense? Would college and university organizations, celebrities, NGOs and politicians publicly support them?
We might see isolated voices, from the right, explaining WHY this Final Solution came about – and those people would quickly be accused of “excusing murder, rape and genocide.” They would be cancelled in a heartbeat.
In fairness, some pro-Palestinian people have been cancelled, losing their jobs and being publicly rebuked – but due to The Great Replacement, the younger generation is sympathetic to the Palestinians (non-Whites will always be favored over Whites in their world-view). Hence, such cancellations have an expiration date. As the older generation dies off, favoritism toward official victims (IE. non-Whites) will increasingly solidify and be encoded into law and policy.
