Is Eric Orwoll Helping the White Cause?

Posted on December 11, 2025 by jewamongyou

When I heard about Return To The Land, I got excited and gave it my full support. I’m an obscure character, so this doesn’t objectively mean much – but it is meaningful to me, so here we are. I visited their GiveSendGo page and donated a small sum. I followed their official X page and its founder, Eric Orwoll.

I posted several comments of encouragement… and was met with deafening silence, even on tweets with only a handful of responses. I asked Orwoll about his position on pro-White Jews, and got no response. It became more and more obvious that Orwoll does not like Jews, regardless of our politics or attitudes toward Whites.

Don’t get me wrong. I fully support his cause, but it bothers me that he’s injected needless toxicity into a movement that should be completely positive.

I get it that Jews have been at the forefront in attacking him, that the ADL considers Return To The Land to be a hate group. Many conservative and pro-White Jews consider the ADL to be a hate group. How about some acknowledgment about that?

If Orwoll hates Jews, let him be honest about it. Instead, we get lies from him, as in this media interview:

Orwoll’s views on race, Jews

…While he insists he is not antisemitic, NewsChannel 5 discovered that, after the UK’s Daily Mail revealed that Orwoll and his ex-wife had once starred in a series of livestreamed porn videos, he seemed to think one of the reporters’ ethnic backgrounds had something to do with it.

NewsChannel 5 Investigates noted, “You kept referring to it as the Jewish reporter, the Jewish journalist and I wasn’t sure why.”

“Well, they were Jewish,” Orwoll answered.

What did that have to do with the story about his controversial history?

“Well, the fact is that gentile journalists weren’t coming after me for having a White neighborhood—Jewish journalists were,” he continued.

Then, there was a post where another person on X wrote, “I do not blame all the Jews for everything. Don’t hate Jews for being Jews.”

Orwoll responded, “Have you considered that you might not know enough about Jews yet?”

Lying publicly is not a good look, especially when you’re bad at it. Praising Hitler is also not a good look; it’s hard to see how this could help in creating a larger, positive, pro-White movement.

I’ve been critical toward blacks, and I’ll continue to do so (as appropriate), however, I long ago made the decision to condemn evil and support good. I’ll support good people regardless of their race. Individual blacks, who are good people, deserve our support and encouragement. Is it too much to ask the same for individual Jews? We can recognize demographic truths while continuing to treat individuals according to their own merit.

Like me, Jared Taylor also got excited about Return To The Land. In fact, Eric Orwoll even spoke at this year’s American Renaissance conference. He wasn’t the only Jew-hater to speak at this conference, and this makes me worry about the future of American Renaissance. Is it becoming Stormfront Lite? Have the neo-Nazis finally conquered one of the last pro-White organizations that welcomes pro-Whites of all backgrounds? I hope not.

It appears that it’s human nature to drift toward extremism. Back when I was an Orthodox Jew, I saw people, especially women, compete with each other for who can be the most frum. The result is a ratcheting up of religious strictness, which is not healthy at all. Muslims become more and more fanatical, leftists become more and more radical and pro-Whites become more and more hateful toward the enemies of White people, real or imagined. Since neo-Nazism is often viewed as an extreme form of pro-Whitism (in fact, it’s not), many frustrated and angry Whites will gravitate toward it.

It’s possible that it’s not possible to win without extremism, and the willingness to resort to extreme measures. This is how the Bolsheviks won. This is how the Left won: “By any means necessary.” Of course, when such extremism takes us in the wrong direction, it’s fair to ask what the point of “victory” would be.

Note: Due to technical issues with this blog, I lost the original post and had to rewrite the last part. I know the original post made some other important points. If/when they come back to me, I’ll update this post accordingly.

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Black Woman Murders her Baby. MSN Shows a White Woman

Posted on November 25, 2025 by jewamongyou

In yet another example of MSN’s antiwhite bias, the story of a black mother who murdered her daughter by placing her in a microwave is accompanied by a stock photo of a White woman with a microwave. Dagens.com, where the story is sourced from, also features this stock photo:

Shame on Dagens.com for publishing this antiwhite propaganda, and shame on MSN for reproducing it. Neither story includes a photo of the actual murderess, so here she is:

Image courtesy of murderpedia.org.

Posted in examples of propaganda | Tagged , | 1 Comment

A Short Story About a Somali Woman

Posted on November 24, 2025 by jewamongyou

I was in line at the grocery store in Portland. A very large Somali woman was at the register. Almost ALL the Somali women in that area were fat, and they all had a lot of kids. As far as I could tell, they all used EBT and WIC.

When the cashier scanned her very large bag of bulk rice, the Somali woman changed her mind and said, “I don’t want it.”

The cashier, looking concerned, said, “Are you sure? It will have to be thrown away.”

The cashier seemed to assume that the waste of so much food would bother the large Somali woman, just as it did her. She was wrong.

The Somali woman wasn’t even the slightest bit concerned about the waste. She apathetically shrugged her shoulders and repeated, “I don’t want it.”

Incidentally, it was because of the Somalis, and their kids, that I stopped buying anything bulk at that store; I’d seen how they stick their hands into the food, return food to the bin and sneeze over the food.

Posted in Africa and blacks, immigration/ Hispanics | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

“Trait Tokens”

Posted on November 24, 2025 by jewamongyou

In today’s monologue, I’d like to explore a concept that’s been lurking within the darker, harder to access, regions of my brain for years – and yes, I realize that this post might come across as silly; I’m just putting it out there anyway.

I won’t claim it’s an original idea; surely, other great minds have stumbled upon it, but I did stumble upon it independently and that should count for something.

It’s the concept of “trait tokens.”

Every human, nay, every mammal (and maybe even some birds) is a collection of traits. For the most part, we all have the whole set, but the tokens vary in potency according to the overall character of the individual.

For example, I’m a kind person in general, so my “Kindness” token is a powerful one. However, I also have a “Meanness” token, an “Anger” token and a “Jealousy” token. In other words, we all have the capability of manifesting all the traits, but to varying degrees.

So far, this is nothing new; y’all already knew this. My take is that when we integrate into a society, it’s not so much as individuals, but as a set of trait token. Our trait token are the ones that actually interact with others and with society in general.

There really is no such thing as an “individual” beyond an arbitrary label we assign to a fleeting collection of cells and trait tokens as they happen to align at any given moment. For the sake of convenience, we assume there’s some continuity.

Trait tokens, on the other hand, do exist – and whether their existence is strictly a “social construct” or a concrete entity of nature is mostly irrelevant to the matter at hand; it is THEY that interact with each other and create societies – or destroy them.

Cultures and races vary in the proportions of various trait tokens they’re composed of. Like “individuals,” societies/ethnicities/nations are also collections of trait tokens.

When large numbers of people from one society migrate to a different society, their trait tokens will impact the native pool of trait tokens. As “individuals,” these migrants will vary, but in numbers, the results are predictable. The migrants are vehicles for the trait tokens.

Similar trait tokens are cohesive; they coalesce and form large blocks, and these blocks define the host societies.

“Low trust” and “high trust” can be viewed as tokens. “Public lust” or “chivalry” can be viewed as tokens as well. In determining what can be considered a “token,” we should ask, “does this trait have currency in society? Does it, or its lack thereof, impact society?”

Of course, a person can change the composition of his own trait tokens. He can do it through years of self-discipline, the use of mentors or changes in life circumstances. His TENDENCY to have a particular trait token composition is set in genetics and his upbringing.

On the Left, “Whiteness” appears to be viewed as a “trait token.” This is how Leftists excuse themselves from glorifying the slow genocide of White people. “We don’t hate White PEOPLE; we just hate the White TOKEN!” I don’t know if any Leftists have put it that way, but I’m pretty sure that’s what they mean when they oppose “Whiteness.”

The problems with that, as I see it, are a) “Whiteness” is too broad to be a token and, b) all the “negative” aspects of “Whiteness” that the Left wants to get rid of happen to be POSITIVE traits.

Treating a wide collection of tokens as one token, as Leftists do with “Whiteness,” is a clear sign that they truly are attacking White people and not just a specific token.

I realize this post might seem like I’m using a lot of words to express the obvious, but I do believe that the concept of “trait tokens” can be useful at the societal level.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | Tagged | Leave a comment

Two New Species of Hominem Discovered

Posted on November 10, 2025 by jewamongyou

I asked Grok to divide humans into two species, those who like quiet and those who like noise:

If we want to divide humanity into two new categories: Those who prefer quiet and those who prefer noise, using conventional anthropological nomenclature, what would we call these two species?

Grok:

If we were to formally split Homo sapiens into two daughter species based solely on their innate, heritable preference for auditory environments (quiet vs. noise), anthropologists would follow the binomial nomenclature established by Linnaeus and subsequent taxonomists.Here’s the most conventionally correct way this would be done:

  1. The quiet-preferring species (the one that values silence, low decibels, and minimal anthropogenic sound):
    Homo silvicolus
    • Etymology: Latin silva (forest, traditionally associated with natural quiet) + -colus (from colere, “to inhabit”).
    • Literal meaning: “the forest-dweller” or “dweller in quiet places.”
    • Common name: Silvics or Silent sapiens.
  2. The noise-preferring species (the one that thrives on high decibels, constant stimulation, urban soundscapes, loud music, etc.):
    Homo strepitus
    • Etymology: Latin strepitus (noise, clamor, din, uproar).
    • Literal meaning: “the noisy one.”
    • Common name: Strepies or Clamor sapiens.

Full taxonomic treatment (as it might appear in a paper):

Subtribe: Hominina
Genus: Homo
Species:
  • Homo silvicolus sp. nov. – the quiet-seeking hominid
      Holotype: a 32-year-old librarian who winces at leaf blowers
      Diagnosis: marked aversion to sound levels >45 dB; seeks acoustic refugia
  • Homo strepitus sp. nov. – the noise-seeking hominid
      Holotype: a 28-year-old festival DJ who owns 12 Bluetooth speakers
      Diagnosis: positive affective response to sound levels 85–110 dB; produces noise for social bonding

Alternative classically grounded names people sometimes joke about:

  • Homo tranquillus (“the calm one”) vs. Homo cacophonius (“the harsh-sounding one”)
  • Homo quietus vs. Homo loudens
  • Homo shazamus vs. Homo boomboxicus (less serious, but internet-approved)

So, in the style of a 19th-century naturalist publishing in Proceedings of the Anthropological Society, the two new species would most properly be:

Homo silvicolus and Homo strepitus

…with the eternal footnote that these two species still interbreed freely at music festivals and family reunions, producing confused hybrids who wear noise-canceling headphones to nightclubs.

Posted in humor | Tagged | Leave a comment

Fake “White” Crime Statistics

Posted on October 25, 2025 by jewamongyou

I’ve written about this before, but since it’s so important, I’m posting about it again – in the form of screenshots from X and a little commentary of my own:

A few comments claim that this is not deliberate deception, but simply a clerical practice:

Let’s take this at face value. It makes no difference; either way, it means that we CANNOT use such statistics to point out how high “White” crime is – because it includes many criminals whose race is only officially “White,” but who are actually mestizo or black.

We find that most leftist/antiwhite arguments boil down to flawed logic. This is a case in point. Whether this phenomenon is technically legal or not makes little difference. The result is that “White” crime-rates are grotesquely inflated because of it.

It’s also important to point out that every claim has a counterclaim. There’s always somebody on the other side of the argument who should be defending the practice or policy.

My question is: Where are they? Why is it that we’ve been bringing this up literally for years, and (to the best of my knowledge) the only response, from official sources, has been silence?

When it looks like antiwhitism, and we’ve been screaming about it for so long, and all we get in response is silence, we must conclude that it’s deliberate antiwhitism – at some level. Otherwise, official sources would be defending themselves. We’d see articles about it in legacy media and “fact-checkers” would have tackled it. I’ve searched Snopes, and I’ve done several Google searches. No results came up.

There’s a concept in Judaic law: Shethiqa kehodhaya. It means “silence is agreement.”

Posted in crime and violence, examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Let’s Not One-Dimensionalize the Nazis

Posted on October 18, 2025 by jewamongyou

I’ve read two biographies of Adolf Hitler, and I’m not ashamed to say that he had some traits I find admirable. He wasn’t a comic book villain. He was a real, complex, human being – just like the rest of us.

But Jewamongyou, you can’t PRAISE Hitler. You can’t admire him or defend him in any way, especially since you’re JEWISH!

Oh yes, I can. I hate him for what he did to my people, but I will not one-dimensionalize him. That would be a cop out, intellectually lazy and, in some ways, dangerous.

Similarly, I will not one-dimensionalize the Nazis, or even the neo-Nazis of today. Here’s an interesting video I just watched:

To the extent that NPCs understand it (very little), they’ll dismiss it as veiled neo-Nazi rhetoric. Yes, it is that, but it’s also a very good explanation of Weimar Germany and how it transitioned into Nazi Germany. It might also be an accurate prediction of America’s future.

The video takes us up to the point where strong men were forged in response to a regime of depravity and looming Communism. So far, so good.

As for what happened next, Hitler’s reckless expansionism and genocides, hopefully we can avoid these next time around.

The world is full of lazy, dishonest, people. Nazism didn’t arise because evil people got up one morning and decided to do evil things. If we don’t want Nazism, perhaps we should get rid of the Weimarism.

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | Tagged | Leave a comment

A Couple of Things I Need to Vent About

Posted on October 15, 2025 by jewamongyou

I’ve been busy with real life lately. A sickly friend and fun stuff like snorkeling. However, I do need to vent my spleen upon these pages as a form of therapy.

It’s a form of therapy; under no conditions are you to actually read this!

Firstly, I found a short video on X where Steven Crowder is trying to debate some black guys at a barber shop:

I won’t knock him for trying, but generally speaking it’s a waste of time trying to debate blacks on racial issues. We don’t even speak the same language.

At some level, when humans have conversations, it’s about dominance. Rarely is it purely an exchange of ideas, and rarely are both parties primarily there to learn from the other side. However, with Africans, it’s much more obvious that the primary purpose of conversations is to gain dominance over your opponent. This is why their conversations tend to be so loud. It’s not about who is objectively “right” or who has the best evidence to support his position, or even who can deliver it most effectively. It’s about who is louder and who projects the most strength. This is also why they repeat themselves so often, sometimes reciting the same phrase ten times or more. Loud vocalizations are a means of projecting dominance. It doesn’t even matter much what’s being said, as long as it’s said loudly and with conviction.

There is no evidence that the art of debate ever took root in Africa, though it was practiced in Asia and the Middle East. Structured debates are, in my opinion, a crowning achievement of Western civilization.

I’m not saying that black people CAN’T debate, but their natural craving for dominance, and their natural excitability, serve as obstacles. Hence, it’s usually a waste of time for a White person to try debating a black person. I’ll point out that it’s also usually a waste of time trying to debate a White person – or even a JEW.

This brings me to my next topic.

I’ve found myself trying to debate Israelis about their pronunciation of Hebrew. More accurately, some Israelis have taken issue with my comments on various platforms – and attacked me as ignorant. When I show them the evidence that Israeli spoken Hebrew is very different from ancient Hebrew, they get very defensive – more so than in years past.

Why? I think it’s because we’ve seen a lot of attacks on Zionism/Israel recently where Israelis are described as “Europeans who colonized Palestine.” Some people have made the connection between Israel’s German-style Hebrew and the claim that Israeli Jews are actually European colonizers.

My view is that it’s a valid point, but it doesn’t somehow delegitimize Jews’ claims to the Holy Land.

Israelis, for the most part, are so invested in their “native language” and its supposed status as “heir to ancient Hebrew” that they’re blind to the obvious. Frankly, I’ve grown tired of debating them, as they’re hopelessly biased.

To them I say, “You can’t have your cake and eat it too!” They (as in Israeli elites) made a decision to promote Europeanized Hebrew exclusively. This was the policy for decades. They can’t now turn around and claim that this Yiddishized jargon is an organic product of the Land of Israel with a legitimate claim as an indigenous Semitic language. No. They “didn’t want to sound like Arabs” – and it just so happens that Arabs sound a lot like ancient Jews. As a consequence, they sound like Germans. It was their choice. They can still defend their claim to the land, and Israel has enough positives that it deserves to exist – but don’t deny the obvious, because it casts doubt on all the other (genuinely strong) arguments for Israel’s existence.

Posted in Africa and blacks, Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Yom Kippur – on a Personal Note

Posted on September 30, 2025 by jewamongyou

I was at a supermarket today (yesterday) and noticed a young woman also shopping. From her appearance, and the way she was dressed, I strongly suspected she’s Jewish. There aren’t many Jews in this part of Dominican Republic. When I see one, I try to say hello. It’s mostly secular Israelis I encounter. This woman is religious. I figured she’s married to one of the Lubavitcher rabbis in town.

I said something to her in Hebrew, and she quickly responded. We chatted, and it turned out I was right; she is married to a local Lubavitcher rabbi.

Perhaps I should recap my own history with Judaism and with Lubavitch Hassidism. I became religious at 15, and a while later I was taken in by Lubavitch in a somewhat nearby city. I lived in their facility for a couple of years, finishing high school. After that, I moved across the country to a yeshiva (a Jewish rabbinical school) in New Jersey. The yeshiva was run by Lubavitch. During my time there, I realized that the Lubavitcher version of Judaism wasn’t for me. I moved to Israel and remained Orthodox, but not Lubavitch for many years. I drifted away from religious observance about 25 years ago.

The woman mentioned to me that tomorrow (today) is Yom Kippur. This is the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, and fasting is mandated by the Torah. It’s the only day of the year that the Torah obligates us to fast – but I don’t fast; I’m not religious anymore…

… and yet I’d rather not know exactly which day Yom Kippur falls on until after it’s passed; otherwise, I feel guilty eating. Religion does that to a person, even years after becoming secular.

Shortly after falling asleep, I had a nightmare. I was in a bus in what looked like Jerusalem, Israel. Shortly before my stop, I saw a tiny little girl crying in the middle of the street. No adults were around her, and traffic was whizzing by her. Nobody paid her any notice. I was horrified and yelled at the bus driver to stop the bus; I needed to rush out to comfort the little girl and help her get to safety. I woke up shaken. I was tormented and troubled.

It took me a while to figure out that the little girl is my soul. It still feels lost without the shelter of Judaism. Religion will do that to a person; I don’t think a person ever truly gets over it.

I’m not against religion. I think it’s necessary for a functional society in most cases. Societies that abandon religion stop having babies or they adopt some sort of secular religion, such as Communism or Wokism.

It must be especially difficult for ex-Muslims, considering the hold Islam has on so much of the world and how pervasive it’s becoming everywhere in the West. If there are any ex-Muslims reading this, I hope you take comfort in the fact that it’s not Allah who’s constantly calling you back into the fold. Rather, it’s something psychological that’s built into our very DNA. As for me, I find salvation in other, more fulfilling, ways than organized religion.

The little girl does have a home.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Glaring Blind Spot of a Leftist Intellectual

Posted on August 8, 2025 by jewamongyou

I just spent a few minutes watching a YouTube video by a guy who comes across as very intelligent, but who leans left. It’s not a long video, so please watch it for yourself:

I spent quite a bit of time browsing the comments, and they all say essentially the same thing: “Brilliant video! Anybody who disagrees is a NAZI!”

I guess I’m a Nazi then. Here’s my comment:

Your reasoning only applies to the state of being a homosexual, which a person has no control over. However, the ACT of homosexual relations does affect well-being. It most certainly does cause the spread of disease and certain health issues. AIDS, Monkey Pox and continency problems are examples linked to this practice. Therefore, by your own reasoning, it can be judged to be “immoral.” FURTHERMORE, you stated in another video that (paraphrasing here) sexual violence in video games is “immoral.” How so? In what way do such fantasies cause a detriment to wellbeing more so than homosexual sex. The opposite seems to be true.

Yes, he actually did make a video where he argued that sexual violence in video games is immoral – but not other kinds of violence. I objected to that too. In my view, fantasy cannot be, in and of itself, immoral. I don’t care how distasteful you think it is. your disgust doesn’t make someone else’s fantasy “immoral.”

Anyway, it’s extremely frustrating for me to see literally hundreds of people glossing over the distinction between sexual preference and an actual sexual act. One involves choice while the other arguable does not – and that’s a distinction the creator hinges his entire video upon!

Will anybody actually address my objection in comments? Probably not, partly because it’s a 7-year-old video, and partly because if those people are already so blind as to not see the issue initially, then nothing I say can change that; they’ll simply fling ad hominem attacks at me.

Perhaps, one could argue that people have no choice but to act upon their sexual preferences, that it’s unreasonable to expect them to refrain from sex their entire lives. Anybody making this argument would have to extend the same reasoning to pedophiles. I doubt they would do so. Also, difficult as it may seem, it is possible to be celibate one’s entire life. Therefore, it is a choice.

Posted in human sexuality and morality | Tagged , | Leave a comment