Strong Evidence of MSN’s Antiwhite Bias

Two days ago, I found an MSN article about the so-called “Tulsa Massacre.” Here’s one of the comments:

I decided to conduct a little experiment. I posted the exact same comment, only switching the races. I followed up with a comment on the comment explaining what I had done. I’ve included the original comment in the graphic:

The following day, here’s what had happened to my comment:

The original comment remained intact; moderators seem to have had no problem with it. I went ahead and reported it for “hate speech.” That was yesterday. As of today, the original comment remains. Two days have passed, and MSN moderation sees nothing wrong with it.

There are only two possibilities that I can think of:

  1. MSN is biased against White people
  2. The original post was reported only by myself, while my post was reported by many antiwhites, and MSN’s actions, or lack thereof, are based on the number of reports it receives. According to Grok, MSN uses a combination of its own algorithm and user feedback for moderation.

I conclude that, given its history, MSN is biased against Whites – but so are most of its readers. My comment probably generated a few reports, and moderation took them seriously, since the reports are in line with its own antiwhite bias. My report was ignored, since because it was the only one, and because it runs contrary to MSN’s antiwhite bias.

This entry was posted in examples of propaganda, freedom of speech issues and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *