Bill Cosby and controlled-media hypocricy

Once again we see the corporate-controlled media pretending to be knights in shining armor, coming to the aid of crime victims. It was this self-same media that was responsible (in large part) for the Charlotte church shooting. It was their ongoing coverup, of black-on-white crime, that pushed the unstable shooter over the edge.
The bodies of that shooting are practically still warm, and now we see headlines such as this one (from New York Magazine):
white privilege
The article bemoans our “rape culture” as it tells the stories of 35 victims of rapist Bill Cosby. Almost all of these victims are white – yet the article directly under this one deals with “white privilege.”
This is the sort of blatant, in your face, hypocrisy that enrages so many people. Even as this article condemns Cosby for his hypocrisy, by opening with lines such as this one:

Consider the evidence of October 2014, when an audience member at a Hannibal Buress show in Philadelphia uploaded a clip of the comedian talking about Bill Cosby: “He gets on TV, ‘Pull your pants up, black people … I can talk down to you because I had a successful sitcom.’ Yeah, but you rape women, Bill Cosby, so turn the crazy down a couple notches … I guess I want to just at least make it weird for you to watch Cosby Show reruns. Dude’s image, for the most part, it’s fucking public Teflon image.

It was precisely media outlets, such as the New York Magazine, that created this “Teflon image.” Let’s look back a bit, to 1984, and examine what the New York Magazine was writing, about Cosby, back then:

The Cosby-Show is a Valentine to middle-class American family life; it sells fatherhood, reassurance, and Jell-O…

Cosby sells reassurance… you will find yourself doubting that Bill Cosby could ever really hurt anyone… nevertheless, tirelessly, Cosby reassures. Love goes on, even if it’s black. Children get his message, especially if they’re white. Cosby isn’t dangerous…

This is the message that the corporate-controlled media has been selling us for decades: Black men aren’t dangerous. They’re reassuring. They represent love, responsibility and old-fashioned American family values.
It appears that New York Magazine was right; white kids DID get his message – and as a result, over 30 of them got raped. Are they enjoying their “white privilege?”

This entry was posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Bill Cosby and controlled-media hypocricy

  1. missattempts says:

    You are an intelligent man. Can you tell me why supposedly intelligent
    people commit slow suicide? Is it because they have their blinders on?
    Is the media responsible for those blinders?
    Everyone has either had or knows someone who has had the knock on
    their front door by the solemn police officer, hat in hand who beings the
    conversation: Mr. ________, I’m sorry to inform you that your child….”
    And yet nothing changes. The same gutless cowards are voted in year
    after year. Can the media weld THAT MUCH POWER? If “perception is
    reality” and the media controls perception, that means the media can
    distort and shape history. It can even conceal history.
    And the children that have been propagandized post 1970. They have
    been indoctrinated towards suicide.
    The media is the moral equvalent of ISIS. They are just as worthy of the
    hatred they inspire. If there IS a devil, they are pushing his agenda.

  2. Stary Wylk says:

    My own opinion of the reality of the Cosby affair is that he made a habit of exchanging drugs for sex. Then, some woman who wasted her life regretted, years after, not getting more than a high out of the transaction.
    When I was a socially backward teenager just learning to talk to girls, I let one I was not sexually interested in seduce me. It took months during which I felt it right to delay each next step. As we were breaking up, she accused me of seducing her.
    To me, a woman’s word is only weakly evidential, like a now cryptic note written to oneself a year ago.

  3. Stary Wylk says:

    My own opinion of the reality of the Cosby affair is that he made a habit of exchanging drugs for sex. Then, some woman who wasted her life regretted, years after, not getting more than a high out of the transaction.
    When I was a socially backward teenager just learning to talk to girls, I let one I was not sexually interested in seduce me. It took months during which I felt it right to delay each next step. As we were breaking up, she accused me of seducing her.
    To me, a woman’s word is only weakly evidential, like a now cryptic note written to oneself a year ago. I don’t trust Blacks much either.

  4. Stary Wylk says:

    Please delete comments #2 and #4.

  5. missattempts says:

    Well. it is true that women will betray low status boyfriends for high
    status ones. Sports and Entertaiment “groupies” are an example of
    this.
    Cosby got his start drugging and raping women in the middle 1960’s.
    Most white women were more redicent in sleeping with black men in
    those days, so it would have been more of a challenge for Cosby to
    “seduce” them in the “regular” way. Cosby needed the “helper” of the
    drugs he spiked the drinks with. They called it “Mikey Finn” in those days.
    If Cosby had hit it big a few short years later, it would have been in the
    midst of the sexual revolution, and he wouldn’t have needed to resort
    to the drugs.

  6. sestamibi says:

    Charleston church shooting.

  7. missattempts says:

    It has nothing to do with Cosby.

  8. panjoomby says:

    cosby is/has a particular form of paraphilia: he wants to have sex with, rub on, “use” sedated women. his twistedness is similar to necrophilia, but instead the victim is warm & alive, & there is risk she may awaken.
    cosby is a charismatic sicko.
    apparently he slipped quaaludes into their drinks.
    it’s not fair that cosby’s black privilege allowed him to get quaaludes – most of us normal humans haven’t seen quaaludes since 1979 or 80! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *