ADL Gets Slapped in the Face by its Own Policies

After decades of pushing hatred against the greatest allies of Jews and Israel, White Americans, the ADL is now SHOCKED that its own policies have brought about a rejection of Zionism. Most of the non-White world does not share Christian White Americans’ love for Jews and Israel. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that White-replacement polices, which the ADL has aggressively supported for years, have now led to the largest union in America, the National Education Association, to reject the ADL.

Nation’s Largest Union Severs Ties with ADL, Citing Group’s Weaponization of Anti-Semitism

A union representing millions of teachers is distancing itself from the Anti-Defamation League, claiming the organization has too broadly leveraged the label of anti-Semitism.

The action came Sunday, according to the New York Post, which noted the National Education Association is America’s largest union with more than 3 million members.

“Allowing the ADL to determine what constitutes anti-Semitism would be like allowing the fossil-fuel industry to determine what constitutes climate change,” NEA delegate Stephen Siegel said during the weekend meeting.

Siegel previously wanted the NEA to slam the Biden administration for supporting Israel during the war in Gaza that began after Gaza-based Hamas slaughtered Israeli civilians on Oct. 7, 2023.

The teachers’ union dropped the ADL as an education partner, saying the ADL is too quick to label criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism…

The ADL called the vote “profoundly disturbing” and said that “NEA activists” were out to “further isolate their Jewish colleagues and push a radical, antisemitic agenda on students.”

“We will not be cowed for supporting Israel, and we will not be deterred from our work reaching millions of students with educational programs every year,” the ADL said.

Liora Rez, the founder of the group StopAntisemitism, said the NEA has left the mainstream behind.

“The most radical fringe has taken over the NEA and they actively promote bigotry against Jews and lies about the Jewish state. Rather than trying to educate our children, they want to indoctrinate them to hate each other,” Rez said.

While it’s unlikely that the National Education Association itself has demographically shifted as much as America as a whole, its members surely see themselves as now representing an increasingly non-White, non-Christian America – and its promotion of antiwhite material, over the past few years, is strong evidence that it prioritizes the views of non-White and non-Christian Americans. Since a majority of younger Americans fall into this category, we can see why this is so.

The ADL: “Let’s promote the replacement of White Christians with non-Whites and non-Christians!”

The NEA: “Wow! You’ve done a great job advancing this agenda. Thanks so much, ADL…”

The NEA: “By the way, this new demographic doesn’t give a shit about Jews or Israel, and we must reflect these attitudes in our policies going forward.”

The ADL: “That’s unacceptable and ANTISEMITIC!!”

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , | Leave a comment

If you Abuse the System, Don’t Complain When it gets Changed

I’m in the process of moving. It’s a policy of mine to consume, within reason, whatever food and drink I have available prior to the move. I’d rather carry it in my stomach, or as extra fat, than in a suitcase.

One of the items I chose to dispatch was an almost finished bottle of Haitian rum. Haiti may be a shithole, but they do make some fine rum. I found this out when a Haitian contractor invited me to try some last year.

Anyway, it put me in the mood to blog, and here I am…

Democrats are shrieking about the recent Supreme Court ruling that limits the power of district judges from interfering with presidential orders.

Conservatives and Trumpists are hailing the ruling as a huge win for America. The truth is more complicated. Some day, there will be another Democrat president – and he’ll be able to single-handedly destroy the country. For the time being, however, it’s a huge win.

Yes, Democrats are shrieking about this Supreme Court ruling, and they’re also shrieking about deportations of illegal immigrants, the arrest of judges and the Alex Padilla episode (where a Democrat senator was tackled while disrupting an event).

Democrats seem to have an endless store of rage at their disposal. They constantly claim that Trump “violates the Constitution” – the same Constitution they ignored during the Biden presidency. They rail against the violation of protocols and the disrespect for traditions.

At some level, they’re right. Trump, and the Supreme Court, are venturing into dangerous territory… but Democrats left no choice.

The way I see it, Democrats (AKA “socialists” and “Communists”) have figured out how to game the system to ensure their own victory. They opened the gates to millions of illegals in order to give themselves more electoral votes, they planted hundreds of activist judges so that those judges could thwart the will of the people, they prosecuted crimes selectively based on ideology and race…

… and then they have the audacity to complain when conservatives notice and tweak the system in order to prevent future abuses. If Democrats care so much about the rule of law and the Constitution, perhaps they should have avoided abusing them when they were in power. Had they refrained from abusing them, there would be no need to change them or reinterpret them now.

In conclusion, if you value a system, then don’t abuse it when given the opportunity. Of course, few Democrats value the system; they only “value” it to the extent that they can manipulate it for their own nefarious purposes.

Posted in politics | Tagged , | 2 Comments

MSN Takes Negrophilia to New Levels

An MSN article titled “Scientists discovered a 2000-year-old glassified human brain near Pompeii that was so well preserved they could perform a neurological study” consists of several slides we must click through in order to read. This is a common trick to get more “clicks” and, hence, more money.

Here’s the leading photo, the one readers see on MSN’s main page, which they must click to open the article:

I did post a comment on the article:

The AI moderator would not allow the first version of my comment, which had the word “scientist” in scare-quotes. I’m predicting that the newer version of my comment will be removed within a day.

Here’s one of the ads from the click-through article:

Full disclosure: The article does show White people, and even a handful of White men, but the primary goal seems to be portraying black men in central roles.

This slide illustrates the poor quality that passes for “journalism” today:

Can somebody explain that first line? Also, the bad punctuation implies that writing is being outsourced to people whose English is limited.

Here’s another slide:

One of the slides shows a famous artists rendition of the Roman Senate:

Let’s zoom in on a portion of this image, and compare it to another version, found elsewhere on the Internet:

There were darker-skinned people in actual Roman art, but this looks like an attempt to make it look like there were black Africans in the Roman Senate.

Here’s yet another full version of the painting. It’s from Goodreads:

In two words, this is how I would describe MSN: Cheap Propaganda.

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What is a “Native American?”

We often hear people say things like, “unless you’re Native American, you’re an immigrant to this country.”

A common, and powerful, objection to this claim is that Native American tribes frequently conquered each other, took each other’s land, and replaced each other long before the arrival of the White Man. Therefore, the only way to claim that Native Americans are native to the land is to adopt the White Man’s concept of America – a concept that was entirely foreign to Native Americans prior to European colonization.

Along the same lines, we should point out that a member of the Lakota tribe (for example) is only native to parts of what we now call the “Midwest.” When a Lakota moves to California, the only way we could consider him “native” is if we hold him subject to the White Man’s colonial perception of “America” or the “United States.” By his tribe’s own indigenous standards, he would not be “native” outside of the Midwest.

This is a built-in contradiction to leftist claims of Native Americans being indigenous to the entirety of the United States.

Even more ridiculous is the leftist claim that, somehow, natives of what is now “Mexico” have more of a right to be in the United States – because they’re “indigenous to America.” The very concept of “America” was a White invention. Is there a Navajo word for “America?” It’s sometimes claimed that the Algonquian and Iroquoian term “Turtle Island” referred to America, but there’s no evidence that they had any knowledge of other continents; Turtle Island would have meant “the known world,” not any specific continent.

If a group of Aztecs wandered north, in pre-colonial times, and told the Apache people that what is now Texas is also their home, by virtue of it being part of North America, the Apache would probably have responded by killing them. At the very least, the claim would have elicited laughter.

In contrast, Native Europeans have had a concept of “Europe” or “Christendom” for centuries. When the Ottomans gathered an army and besieged Vienna in 1683, other European nations rallied to Vienna’s defense. All of Europe, with the exception of a small part of Turkey, shares enough commonality to be considered one civilization.

From Grok:

The earliest inklings of a pan-European identity can be traced to the Middle Ages, particularly from the 8th to 11th centuries, when shared religious, cultural, and political developments began to foster a sense of commonality across diverse European groups.

The same might be said of Eastern Asia and the Middle East. Native Americans had no such concept until it was forced upon them by outsiders in more recent times. Again, I’ll quote Grok:

The concept of a pan-Native-American identity, where diverse Indigenous peoples across North America saw themselves as part of a unified cultural or political group, is largely a modern phenomenon, emerging in response to shared experiences of European colonization, displacement, and cultural suppression. There’s little evidence of such an identity before European contact, as Native American societies were highly diverse, with distinct languages, cultures, and political structures, often organized by tribe, clan, or regional confederacies like the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Confederacy).

Despite all this, I’m not claiming that there is no validity to a wider Native-American identity. I do believe that Native American tribes should work together to further their own interests, protecting their cultures, languages and traditional lands. At the same time, we should all recognize that the very concept of “Native-American” is a White invention, made relevant only through White colonialism.

If not for White colonialism, the various tribes of the Americas would still be at constant war with each other, raiding each other, enslaving each other, eating each other and sacrificing each other to their gods.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Straw Man Arguments from The Right

There are two kinds of people on God’s green Earth: Those who seek the truth, and those who seek to support their own entrenched ideas, truthful or not. I strive to be among the first group. It’s what makes me happy.

Most people, both on the left and on the right, belong to the second group.

If you care about the truth, first do everything you can to accurately identify what the other party is actually saying. It’s not always obvious. We owe it to ourselves to tease the point out of their often-clumsy words.

Here’s an example:

There are a few ways to interpret this tweet, and we can’t know which interpretation Suzie intended. We should find the strongest point she could have meant and address that one. Lazy people, who do not value the truth, will interpret it with the weakest point possible, and then attack that. Thus, we find responses such as this meme:

It’s a great meme – assuming Suzie were actually advocating for cheap labor. I don’t think most Democrats actually want migrants working for $11 an hour. Maybe some do, but I’m pretty sure most of them don’t. The meme misses the point; it’s not going to change anybody’s mind.

The strongest way we can interpret Suzie’s post is that she believes America benefits from hardworking people. She looks back at America’s history and sees pioneers breaking their backs for a pittance. This is what built America, and it’s what made America great. Therefore, we should not be deporting such people – legal or not.

My response was, speaking for MAGA, not necessarily for myself:

I didn’t want to get into the demographic aspect of it here. At least for the short term, assuming her point is valid, the solution would be seasonal work visas for workers who are vetted – and that those workers would not count toward Electoral College representation. There are, of course, other ways to address her point, but they’re only effective if we understand her point in the strongest way possible.

Suzie’s approach, according to my interpretation, is similar to my own: We want people in America who are good for America, regardless of their legal status. We would disagree about which people those would be. “Legality” is just a piece of paper from a government that hardly anybody trusts.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , | 9 Comments

Strong Evidence of MSN’s Antiwhite Bias

Two days ago, I found an MSN article about the so-called “Tulsa Massacre.” Here’s one of the comments:

I decided to conduct a little experiment. I posted the exact same comment, only switching the races. I followed up with a comment on the comment explaining what I had done. I’ve included the original comment in the graphic:

The following day, here’s what had happened to my comment:

The original comment remained intact; moderators seem to have had no problem with it. I went ahead and reported it for “hate speech.” That was yesterday. As of today, the original comment remains. Two days have passed, and MSN moderation sees nothing wrong with it.

There are only two possibilities that I can think of:

  1. MSN is biased against White people
  2. The original post was reported only by myself, while my post was reported by many antiwhites, and MSN’s actions, or lack thereof, are based on the number of reports it receives. According to Grok, MSN uses a combination of its own algorithm and user feedback for moderation.

I conclude that, given its history, MSN is biased against Whites – but so are most of its readers. My comment probably generated a few reports, and moderation took them seriously, since the reports are in line with its own antiwhite bias. My report was ignored, since because it was the only one, and because it runs contrary to MSN’s antiwhite bias.

Posted in examples of propaganda, freedom of speech issues | Tagged , | Leave a comment

My Thoughts on the Israel/Iran/US Situation

Regarding Trump’s decision to drop bombs on Iran, I’m not sure it was the right thing to do; I have serious concerns about it, because Iran did not attack the US first, at least not recently. That being said, I do understand Trump’s reasoning; Iran’s government is a bunch of blood-thirsty, terrorist-supporting fanatics. It cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. Its continued chants of “Death to America” and calling the US “The Great Satan” should not be taken lightly.

Pakistan can also not be trusted with nuclear weapons, but there’s not much that can be done about that at this point. No Islamic country, including the UK, should be trusted with nukes. Radical Muslims have shown, over and over again, how little human life means to them.

If I were president, I would not have bombed Iran, but I would give my full support to Israel. Yeah, I know. I’m Jewish, so of COURSE I do. Just hear me out.

Iran has been waging war against Israel for decades, mostly by proxy. From Grok:

1982–2000: Hezbollah Attacks During Israeli Occupation of Southern Lebanon (Proxy)

  • Description: Following Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon, Iran trained and armed Hezbollah, a Lebanese Shia militia, to resist Israeli forces. Hezbollah conducted numerous attacks, including guerrilla warfare, rocket attacks, and bombings targeting Israeli military personnel and civilians in southern Lebanon and northern Israel. These attacks were part of Iran’s support for Hezbollah to counter Israel’s presence in Lebanon.
  • 2006: Hezbollah Attacks During the Lebanon War (Proxy)
  • Date: July–August 2006
  • Description: During the 2006 Lebanon War, Hezbollah, backed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), launched thousands of rockets into northern Israel and engaged in ground combat with the IDF. Iran provided direct assistance, with IRGC operatives allegedly participating in rocket attacks and securing Hezbollah’s long-range missiles.
  • Details: Hezbollah fired approximately 4,000 rockets, killing 43 Israeli civilians and 12 soldiers. IRGC operatives reportedly supervised an attack on the Israeli warship INS Hanit using a C-802 anti-ship missile, killing four crewmen.
  • 2009: Iranian Arms Smuggling to Hamas and Hezbollah (Proxy)
  • Date: January–November 2009
  • Description: Iran attempted to smuggle weapons to Hamas and Hezbollah for use against Israel. In January and March 2009, Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian arms convoys in Sudan bound for Hamas in Gaza. On November 4, 2009, Israel intercepted a ship in the eastern Mediterranean carrying hundreds of tons of Iranian weapons intended for Hezbollah.
  • 2013–2017: Hezbollah and Iranian-Linked Attacks in Syria and Lebanon (Proxy)
  • Date: Multiple occasions between 2013 and 2017
  • Description: Hezbollah, supported by Iran’s IRGC Quds Force, conducted attacks on Israeli targets in Syria and Lebanon during the Syrian Civil War. These included rocket attacks and cross-border incursions, often in retaliation for Israeli strikes on Iranian and Hezbollah targets in Syria.
  • October 7, 2023: Hamas Attack on Israel (Proxy)
  • Date: October 7, 2023
  • Description: Hamas, a Palestinian militant group partially funded and supported by Iran, launched a large-scale surprise attack on southern Israel, triggering the Gaza War. The attack involved rockets, ground incursions, and massacres of civilians.
  • 2023–2024: Houthi Missile Attacks on Israel (Proxy)
  • Date: Ongoing from late 2023
  • Description: The Houthi movement in Yemen, backed by Iran, launched ballistic missiles and drones targeting Israeli territory, particularly the port city of Eilat, in solidarity with Hamas during the Gaza War.

Iran, therefore, has been attacking Israel for many years – by proxy.

The US has been attacking Russia for the past few years also by proxy, but Russia hasn’t yet considered it an “act of war.” Do we have a double standard?

Yes, we do, and this is how it should be. Let me show you why:

We view attacks on women and children more harshly than attacks on grown men. Why? Because they’re more vulnerable. So too is Israel. No matter how mighty Israel’s military and intelligence might be, the fact remains that it’s a tiny speck of relative civilization in a sea of hostile Muslim countries. Even “allies” such as Egypt and Jordan are teeming with fanatics who would love to exterminate every Jew in Israel.

What may be considered a national inconvenience for countries like Russia or the US can be considered an existential threat to a country like Israel. It must act accordingly. Therefore, the claim the “Israel started the war against Iran” rings hollow. Iran started the war long ago, and hasn’t ceased.

Here’s a recent tweet from Iran’s supreme leader:

Why would the victory of Palestinians be important to Iran? Because they’re MUSLIM, and Muslims are supposed to look out for each other.

Israel is, culturally-speaking, very much a part of the Western world. Its founders took pains to make it so. It’s a functioning democracy where people of any background can live in peace.

Shouldn’t the leader of the free world, the United States, look after its Western ally the same way Iran looks after its Muslim brethren? I think it should – not necessarily by bombing Iran, but at least by providing military, diplomatic, intelligence and humanitarian support.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

No Kings Meme

I just created this new meme based on recent “no kings” protests. I’m not sure it’s a good one. Please let me know. Feel free to share it if you like it:

Posted in Africa and blacks, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged | 7 Comments

Why are Insects Attracted to Light?

I just watched one of the many inferior quality science videos on YouTube. It claims to have an explanation for why insects are attracted to light. After rejecting the theory that insects evolved to use the Sun for orientation, Insane Curiosity reaches the conclusion that… insects evolved to use the Sun for orientation – except that they face AWAY from the Sun. He claims that this instinct served insects quite well until humans came along and invented fire. You’d think that before Homo Erectus, fire was unknown in the world. What an odd assumption!

Even more so when we consider that insects arrived on the scene during the Ordovician period, about 480 million years ago. Later, during the Carboniferous period, Oxygen levels peaked at about 35%. I’ll quote from Grok:

Oxygen levels on Earth were likely highest during the Carboniferous period, roughly 300 million years ago, peaking at around 35% of the atmosphere compared to today’s 21%. This was driven by massive plant growth and swampy forests that produced oxygen through photosynthesis while sequestering carbon. Data from ice cores and fossil records, like those studied by geochemists such as Robert Berner, support this, showing elevated O₂ levels due to high plant productivity and low decomposition rates in oxygen-poor swamps. Exact timing and levels vary slightly in models, but the Carboniferous stands out.

How long did Oxygen levels remain high? Again, I’ll quote from Grok:

Elevated oxygen levels during the Carboniferous period, peaking around 35% of the atmosphere, likely persisted for approximately 50–60 million years, from about 330 to 270 million years ago. This duration is inferred from geochemical models, such as those by Robert Berner, and fossil evidence indicating sustained high plant productivity and low decomposition rates in swampy environments. Levels began to decline toward the end of the Permian period (~270 million years ago) due to changes in climate, vegetation, and tectonic activity, gradually approaching modern levels of ~21%. Precise durations vary slightly depending on the model and proxy data used.

During this very long period of time, fire would have been extremely common. Even the slightest spark would be enough to ignite a conflagration. Another consequence of such high levels of Oxygen is that insects grew to great sizes. Insect do not have lungs. Instead, they “breathe” through their exoskeletons. They’re small today because Oxygen levels are low, and they cannot absorb enough of it to support large bodies.

This means that insects would have been an important part of the diet for many creatures during this period. In fact, they would have been a staple for many species.

How might the insects have avoided predators? They would have congregated near fires. Fire scares away predators, most of which were flying creatures with relatively slow reproduction cycles – at least compared to insects. Even though many insects would be burned by the fire, or overcome by the smoke, they wouldn’t care; their sheer numbers would make such sacrifices inconsequential. Those who kept away from the fire would be easy prey for flying predators, and they would have died in much larger numbers. It would have made sense for predators of insects to stay away from fire, but for insects to remain close to it.

I don’t know if I’m the first to think of this explanation, but I haven’t found it anywhere else; it popped into my head at 2 AM, when I should have been sleeping.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Not a Plumbing Problem…”

By default, most authors write for their own IQ bracket. My IQ is somewhere around 130 (at least for verbal), so my writing is geared toward readers with a similar IQ. Genius-level readers, if I have any, would view my writings as simplistic and boring. Average-level readers would view them as esoteric nonsense; they’re unable to grasp most of what I’m trying to say. Readers with an IQ of 85 are too busy watching TikTok, rap videos or low-brow comedy.

Ideally, I’d like my writings to be comprehensible to a wider audience. However, if past real-life conversations and online debates are any indication, trying to reach the sub-90 IQ crowd is a waste of time… unless, maybe, I become a rap artist and convey my messages that way.

Speaking of real-life conversations, I had an interesting one today.

There is water dripping from my ceiling into my apartment. Management had their Dominican plumber come over to take a look. Upon closer inspection, it turned out that the dripping was coming from the light fixture in the ceiling.

This is not a plumbing problem; it’s an ELECTRICAL problem” he pronounced.

If I were writing in default mode, I would leave it at that – because the absurdness of the plumber’s statement is self-evident.

At first, I didn’t know how to respond; it took me a while to force myself to think at his level. In his (very African) view, since the water was coming from the light fixture, it’s an electrical problem. After all, a light fixture is “electrical.”

I’m sure that, upon further reflection, he would realize that the water is coming from SOMEWHERE, and the origin is definitely NOT an electrical circuit. I would hope that he’d realize this, but who knows.

Either way, a higher-IQ person would probably never come up with a statement like that; it shows a profound lack critical thinking skills.

I would be willing to pay in order to be at that level of thinking for a few days, just to gain a better understanding of how most of the world thinks. It would be a form of “low-IQ tourism.”

Posted in Africa and blacks, nurture vs. nature and I.Q. | Tagged , | 2 Comments