Money Talks 2

Just an update on my previous post. It looks a lot better using a stamp:

Posted in activism | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Money Talks

If you’re like most Americans, you’ve come across dollar bills with the “Where’s George” stamp:

It’s a fun project to participate in. Here’s the website.

You may be wondering, is it legal to write on US currency? As a matter of fact, it is:

Whoever mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, or Federal Reserve bank, or the Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 700; Pub. L. 103–322,
 title XXXIII, §330016(1)(B), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146
.)

Obviously, stamping Where’s George content on a bill doesn’t render it “unfit to be reissued,” and there is no such intent in doing so. To the best of my knowledge nobody has ever been arrested, in the US, for participating in such a challenge.

In the near future, the government is probably going to replace Andrew Jackson’s image, on the twenty dollar bill, with that of Harriet Tubman. I’m seeing a lot of grumbling about this from my white-advocate friends.

From what I know about Tubman, she was a hero to her people, and risked her life to free people from slavery. She suffered for a worthy cause – something that many of us can relate to. In a normal world, having her image on currency wouldn’t bother me at all.

But we’re not living in normal times. Instead, we’re living in an era when all instruments of power are harnessed to shove Diversity down our throats, to degrade white people and to deprive us of our liberties. In this context, Tubman is being used as a weapon against us. I think this is disrespectful to her otherwise honorable legacy.

In any event, we should be writing “It’s Okay to be White” on our paper currency – or some other worthy, non-violent message that challenges the narrative of the hostile elite.

I would recommend using them in cash machines, and not face-to-face in order to avoid a confrontation. Another option is to put them in tip jars.

Let’s do this people!

Posted in activism | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

An Unwelcome Revival of Race Science

Somebody on Quora linked to a Guardian article from 2018 called “An Unwelcome Revival of Race Science” by Gavin Evans.

Here is my rebuttal:

I took the time to read your linked article. It does nothing to actually address the issue until halfway through. Then it simply rehashes tired, and debunked, notions, such as Lewontin’s Fallacy:

“Individuals often share more genes with members of other races than with members of their own race.” Yes… and many men are as short as the average woman – but this does nothing to negate the fact that there’s an average height difference between the two sexes.

Most shocking is the straw man argument that pervades the article – that race-realists deny the role of environment in IQ. The author doesn’t come out and state this explicitly, but the arguments he uses are based on this flawed assumption. The Flynn Effect was probably the result of better medical care, education and nutrition; nobody denies the importance of these factors. I say “was” because the Flynn Effect has now reversed itself; IQs are now DECLINING.

The same straw man argument is used when citing early IQ tests of Ashkenazi Jews and Orientals. Both groups had it hard in the early 20th century, and back then IQ tests were, indeed, culturally biased – as the author does point out.

Mr. Evans’ use of twin studies is a classic example of cherry picking. I am no fan of Charles Murray, and Murray’s data must be used with caution – but this doesn’t mean that his data is worthless, or that it should be entirely ignored.

Mr. Evans seems to be under the impression that humans either have intelligence or not, and that humans at the lower end of normal intelligence would be incapable of creativity or innovation:

“Set aside for a moment the fact that agriculture, towns and alphabets first emerged in Mesopotamia, a region not known for its cold spells. There is ample scientific evidence of modern intelligence in prehistoric sub-Saharan Africa. In the past 15 years, cave finds along the South African Indian Ocean coastline have shown that, between 70,000 and 100,000 years ago, biologically modern humans were carefully blending paint by mixing ochre with bone-marrow fat and charcoal, fashioning beads for self-adornment, and making fish hooks, arrows and other sophisticated tools, sometimes by heating them to 315C (600F). Those studying the evidence, such as the South African archaeologist Christopher Henshilwood, argue that these were intelligent, creative people – just like us.”

In fact, there’s a wide range that falls within the bounds of “modern intelligence.”

It’s also not surprising that the first civilizations would emerge in warmer temperate zones; that’s where agriculture and domestication of livestock would have been easier, with less harsh winters. The natives of Europe probably didn’t evolve the traits that we associate with advanced society until later, well after civilization had a chance to spread. It’s becoming increasingly evident that humans evolve much faster than previously thought.

Mr. Evans addresses this point by writing:

The problem here is that race scientists are not comparing like with like. Most of these physical changes involve single gene mutations, which can spread throughout a population in a relatively short span of evolutionary time. By contrast, intelligence – even the rather specific version measured by IQ – involves a network of potentially thousands of genes, which probably takes at least 100 millennia to evolve appreciably.
Given that so many genes, operating in different parts of the brain, contribute in some way to intelligence, it is hardly surprising that there is scant evidence of cognitive advance, at least over the last 100,000 years. The American palaeoanthropologist Ian Tattersall, widely acknowledged as one of the world’s leading experts on Cro-Magnons, has said that long before humans left Africa for Asia and Europe, they had already reached the end of the evolutionary line in terms of brain power. “We don’t have the right conditions for any meaningful biological evolution of the species,” he told an interviewer in 2000.


He would do well to read The Ten Thousand Year Explosion by Cochran and Harpending. Therein, we see that the opposite is true; humans have experienced much more intense evolutionary pressure for increased intelligence – at least in certain locales. His assumption that evolution takes longer to act when there is a plurality of genes needs evidence – especially if we recognize that there may be more than one kind of intelligence.

Let’s be fair; we can’t expect one short article to be as comprehensive as the entire books written by race-realists. Nevertheless, a majority of the article simply tells us that “race-science has been debunked” and its promoters “have been ostracized.” The few actual arguments it presents are skeletal and flawed.
Posted in Race science | Leave a comment

Project Veritas Sues the New York Times

This video is priceless, and I had to share it.

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Libraries Eliminate Late Fees

I just got this notification from Washington County Public Libraries:

Washington County libraries have (hooray, hooray) eliminated overdue fines. We will no longer charge for overdue materials, and if you had overdue fines, they have been removed from your account.

We have made this change because WCCLS libraries are for everyone – our libraries’ mission is to serve all residents of Washington County – equally, affordably and with easy access. Studies have shown that overdue fines most severely impact communities of color and/or with lower incomes, and don’t significantly promote the timely return of library materials.

So, this change was an easy, logical, happy choice for our libraries. 

The included link takes us to Urban libraries.org, a Social Justice group that focuses on the narrative of official victimhood. A glance at its executive board shows how progressive they are; only three of its 15 executives are white males – and those three are all senior citizens. Needless to say, all 15 of them are prominent in government or the corporate world.

Following the source link from Urban Libraries takes us to the Chicago Office of Mayor official website. Oddly enough, even though the Chicago site is cited as the source that such fines “most severely impact communities of color… ,” there is actually no mention of “communities/people of color” on that website. It speaks of “working poor, children and marginalized populations.” Apparently, to Urban Libraries, it goes without saying that healthy, heterosexual, white people cannot be marginalized.

The arguments for eliminating late fees might make sense, but their concern for “communities of color,” rather than “poor people” constitutes yet one more nudge toward the racial caste system our rulers have planned for us. That is to say, they’re conditioning us to equate “communities of color” (IE. non-whites) with “marginalized communities” (IE. poor people). It’s Biden’s “Poor kids are as bright as white kids” gaffe, but a bit more subtle.

Of course, Biden was anything but subtle when he announced that:

“Our priority will be Black, Latino, Asian, and Native American owned small businesses, women-owned businesses, and finally having equal access to resources needed to reopen and rebuild.”

It should be obvious that his previous “gaffe” was actually a Freudian Slip… a Freudian Slip that sets the tone for local governments and quasi-governmental agencies all over the country.

Posted in examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Who Should be in Charge of Immigration

We haven’t had a legitimate Federal government for a long time. Any traces of legitimacy have recently been erased. Please participate in this poll:

Since we have no legitimate Federal government, who should be in charge of immigration?
  • Add your answer

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, Poll | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Biden’s War on White-Supremacy

There’s nothing new in this post; I’m simply sharing an answer I wrote on Quora that I’m proud of. In fact, I’ll include the entire thread:

What is President Joe Biden’s war on white supremacy really all about?


Me:

There is no “war on white supremacy.” If you want to know what a war on extremism looks like, have a gander at how the US government relates to Islam. It will seek out, and try to destroy Islamic extremists – but, at the same time, it nurtures MODERATE Islam. This is what a war on extremism looks like.

In contrast, the US government views ANY type of white-identity/white-pride/white-advocacy as “extremism.” In the eyes of the government, there is no such thing as moderate white-advocacy.

The problem with this is that there absolutely IS a moderate white-advocacy movement, but by treating us as extremists, the government is actually creating extremists… and it’s not just the government, but also its Big Tech allies, the banks, and all of corporate America. In other words, the US government is part of a vast effort to CREATE white-supremacy. The inevitable result will be actual terrorist attacks by “white-extremists.” This is exactly what happened with Dylan Roof – and the elites want more of it. They create a situation where white-extremism is distilled and promoted – and then when the inevitable happens, they use it as an excuse to ramp up their anti-white rhetoric even more, and to seize even more power at our expense.

But you ask what it’s “really about.” The answer should be obvious. In 1964, the US was about 90% white. Now we’re looking at whites being a minority in a few years. This is not by accident, and it’s not something that “just happened.” As a matter of fact, talking heads have been rejoicing over this for a long time. Joe Biden himself said it:

https://youtu.be/peF-ae2AINU

So, if you’re silly enough to believe that powerful men will believe that whites becoming a minority is “something to be proud of” and yet they did NOT work to make it happen, then what kind of person would that make Joe Biden? He’s been in government for decades, so either he’s been negligent in working for “something to be proud of” or he’s been working toward The Great Replacement.” Which is it? The demographic results speak for themselves.

Let’s not sugarcoat it. When governments consider pride in one’s one heritage to be “extremism” and “dangerous” then it’s not a “war on extremism.” It’s a War on Whites.

If you doubt this, then consider how our government views black-pride, black identity and black advocacy. It’s encouraged everywhere – even to the point where if somebody objects to it, he himself is considered an “extremist.” Defacing BLM murals is now considered a “hate-crime,” but distributing “It’s Okay to be White” flyers is subject to police investigation. This is a war on white people, not on white-supremacy.”

Cherie Nixon

Subcommittee Chairman Raskin Releases FBI Document on White Supremacists in Law Enforcement

Me:

I read the linked article. It says nothing of white-nationalism or white-advocacy. But from other government sources that I’ve read and watched, no such distinction is made. That is to say, if a police officer is found to express any concern for white people as a group, he will be considered a “white-supremacist” and fired.

One of the secondary links has this tidbit:

“In 2017, a study of racial attitudes found that white police officers are nine times as likely as a white nonpolice citizen to think that Black people are more violent than white people.”

Question: Where is the study where they queried the attitudes of BLACK officers?

Question: Wouldn’t it be reasonable that long-term contact with the reality of black crime could bring about opinions that “black people are more violent than white people?” Even dogs have noticed this. Yes, there are “racist” dogs.

Question: Wouldn’t the fact that the writer capitalizes “black” but does not capitalize “white” indicate that bias is involved here?


Cherie Nixon

Good question, they ought to ask Black officers. The reason Black is capitalized is because African Americans were kidnapped from Africa hundreds of years ago, so today they have no connection to Africa, and no idea what their exact heritage is. All they know is that they are treated differently here because of their skin color, so many of them like to just use the word “Black” to describe their heritage. As opposed to me, I know that my heritage is primarily from the UK with a bit of German mixed in, and that my ancestors came here of their own will. And since white is the default skin color here, being white isn’t a significant part of my identity. For general heritage, for some reason we call ourselves Caucasian. If we ever stop using that term, then I suppose we could call ourselves White instead.

Black people are over-policed. If you police one segment of the population more than all the others, you will probably find crime there more often, too. They are also more likely to live in poverty, another potent influence for crime. If we could stop being such a racist society, more of them would be able to escape poverty. They have succeeded in escaping from poverty in the past, even during segregation, until white supremacists came along and destroyed them through rioting and mass murder.

Me:

Yes, I’m aware of the ostensible reasons some people capitalize “black” but not “white.” I’ve even written about it:


Seattle Times: Whites are more diverse than blacks – Jewamongyou

In other words, I don’t buy the official explanation – especially since the vast majority of white Americans don’t identify as any of their particular European origins. Most American whites are mutts, and their only meaningful ethnicity is “white.” As a matter of fact, we see this in the census questions; they break down the Hispanic category to specific national origins. Not so for whites. Is Biden going to change this? I doubt it, and I’m unaware of any rumblings from the Left to change this.

Yes, black areas are probably over-policed. Not only that, but fake victims of crime describe (imaginary) black males more often. On top of that, men are far more likely to be falsely accused of rape than are women. Imagine that!

It all boils down to one fact: Demographics that are known for their propensity for certain activities will also be falsely accused, and suspected, of such activities. They’re also going to be over-policed. These go hand in hand. No contradiction here.

You remind me of my mother (who I love very much). When I was but a young whippersnapper, I had just endured four years of forced busing into 90% black schools. The experience was traumatic for me, as the rates of violent crime, bullying and open racial intimidation were off the charts. It was harrowing, and my experiences were not unique; over the years, I’ve met other non-blacks who had similar experiences – getting beaten, threatened, harassed etc. Later in life, I also experienced the contrast between black areas and white/Asian areas. There is no doubt that black people commit more crime, specifically violent crime. Obviously, there will be exceptions. I’m speaking of wider tendencies. Also, I would never judge an individual solely on his race; I’m speaking of wider demographics.

Edit: My mother suggested that the black crime rate is no higher than the white one, and my jaw dropped. I was speechless – after those four years of hell.

There’s more to go on than personal experience, FBI crime stats and police reports. Examination of victims’ statements also confirm this fact. Even left-leaning news sources confirm this, if you know how to read between the lines. In New York City, the vast majority of violent crime is done by blacks or Hispanics. If you read of somebody getting beaten, murdered, raped or robbed, nine times out of ten, the perpetrator will not be white or Asian. However, these news sites go to great lengths to make this less obvious.

If you have a Quora account, please go there and give my answer, and comments, a thumbs-up.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

KATU Portland/ABC Tortures English to Promote its Narrative

Harris/Biden is in the White House, and the Left controls both houses of Congress. Things are looking up for tyranny these days… and yet the Far Left is still not happy. Antifa continues to riot in Portland.

Here’s how KATU reported recent events here:

PORTLAND, Ore. (KATU) — Earlier this month, Mayor Ted Wheeler announced that he was conferring with law enforcement and other local leaders on new ways to confront groups of people like what the city witnessed Wednesday night. Last week, Wheeler said that getting the pieces in place was going to take some time. The question that many residents and business owners have is: how long?

“Groups of people like what the city witnessed?” Most educated native English speakers would be appalled at such a sentence. It’s awkward at best. From the accompanying photo, and the fact that those “groups of people” attacked the I.C.E. building, it’s obvious that they represent the Far Left, which most of us refer to as “Antifa.” Here’s one of the photos from the article:

I don’t recognize that symbol from the Alt-Right. It doesn’t look like Pepe the Frog. It is, of course, the Anarchy symbol. Though not synonymous with Antifa, it often goes hand in hand.

Why can’t KATU simply write “… on new ways to confront Far-Left mobs when they riot, as they did Wednesday night?”

Who do they think they’re fooling?

Posted in crime and violence, examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Bernie Sanders Mural Defaced, Investigated as Hate-Crime

Please forgive me for the lack of any deep insights this time; I’m simply kvetching about yet another perversion of justice.

From TWOP News:

A mural of Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders was defaced near Navy Yard in Southeast D.C., and it’s being investigated as a hate crime, police said.

Between Dec. 15 and Jan. 14, police say someone painted an image of Pepe the Frog on the Sanders mural…

The Pepe the Frog meme, which started as an innocuous cartoon online, has been repurposed by white nationalists and anti-Semites.

The Anti-Defamation League declared the frog a hate symbol five years ago.

In other words, the ADL gets to define legal terms, which authorities use to prosecute people. Had the ADL not declared Pepe the Frog a “hate symbol,” then the artist would probably not be facing charges at all, as the city wouldn’t waste its time prosecuting a mere re-rendering of public art.

Various other news sites have reported this incident, but I have not been able to ascertain whether the mural was done on public property, or privately commissioned on private property. I think this makes a big difference, because if the original mural was done on public property, then it’s graffiti in its own right; it should enjoy no special protection. If it was commissioned by private parties, on private property, then the Pepe artist is actually guilty of a crime.

Either way, this is yet another example of our rapid descent into tyranny. When private interest groups are allowed to “declare” symbols they don’t like as “hate symbols,” and the government acts on it, we’re in trouble.

Furthermore, if somebody had similarly defaced a mural of Trump, with an icon of the Left (MLK for example), would hate-crime charges also be pursued? Of course not. So this is probably a case of selective enforcement.

Is the communist millionaire Sanders considered “protected” because he’s a Jew, or is it because he’s communist? We’re not told. If somebody painted a mural of Pepe the Frog on a blank wall, in the same way that Sanders’ portrait was done, then would it also be considered a hate-crime? We’re not told.

For a while now, I’ve been uncomfortable wearing my MAGA hat, because it’s an invitation for cries of “You LOST! Get over it!.” Funnily enough, Amazon has Pepe the Frog hats but, after shopping around, I’ve decided to try to make my own. They can’t steal the election from Pepe.

Posted in activism, freedom of speech issues, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Are Accusations of Historic Racism Ever Justified?

We’ve all seen them, articles from the Corporate Media, or rags such as The Huffington Post, or Slate, condemning the actors and actresses of yore for being insensitive to non-whites. We’ve seen how they hold historic figures to today’s politically correct standards, and rush to cancel some of the greatest luminaries in Western theater. Time after time, we read these reports – and dismiss them as unreasonable, as they usually are. Black face is not necessarily a symptom of hate or oppression.

But is it possible that sometimes those old-time movies really did go too far? Is there any point where readers of this blog would admit that the actors in question should have shown more respect for non-whites?

I submit to you one case that would be a good candidate for this: The Episode of The Spider Woman (1943). Here we see Sherlock Holmes describing an African Pygmy as:

Poison-immune, little, dog-like, faithful to their master, able to creep through the smallest openings, the perfect instrument for the spider-murders… Pygmy!

And then:

… and that creature in the suitcase

Probably not the best choice of words to describe somebody who is, after all, a fellow human being. If I were a Pygmy, I’d probably laugh at this. I certainly wouldn’t be outraged, or call for the cancellation of Sherlock Holmes, but it wouldn’t shock me if somebody was offended by it.

What do you think?

Posted in Africa and blacks, book/movie/video reviews and links | Tagged , , | Leave a comment