Jewamongyou

My friend Diversity Chronicle sent me a Tucker Carlson video, where Carlson dismissed the importance of race. He writes:

Tucker Carlson has revealed himself to be an enemy of whites. He is a race denier who is urging that people not talk about race, and saying that race doesn’t matter etc. even as whites are singled out by their race and attacked for it. He does this, even after he watched BLM, a black Marxist group, burn the country down last year. I can’t take Tucker seriously now. Here is an example: https://www.bitchute.com/video/HWnvQQOecjF8/ Tucker engages in misdirection by saying the issue isn’t race, preventing many whites from seeing it. This causes actual harm. Race won’t go away, nor should we wish that it would. Assimilation and intermarriage are dysgenic; it results in white annihilation.



Tucker doesn’t want whites to see themselves as whites, if they continue to see themselves as “conservatives”  and identify with an abstract idea, rather than as a people united by blood, even as their enemies insist race does matter. They will lose, and why? Because they aren’t playing the same game. We have witnessed the plight of our race get much worse in a short time. At the rapid rate of increasing anti-whiteness, we lose with a “lesser of two evils” approach. It rewards failure and betrayal, which guarantees more of the same. It also fails to keep pace with the rising violent opposition we face. In an era where we have a viable alternative media, we don’t need Tucker Carlson. Fox keeps him on to keep the populist viewers from leaving the plantation.

In a perfect world, my friend would be right. Tucker is wrong, and we should always strive for the truth: That race DOES matter.

But there’s another kind of truth: The truth of societal dynamics and human nature. It’s not my intention to make excuses for Carlson, but to point out some realities.

1. If Carlson were to speak the truth about race, he would no longer have a platform; Fox would drop him like a hot potato, and he’d end up on the Dark Web preaching to the choir. Most of his influence would be gone.
2. Most of us don’t arrive at our recognition of racial realities in one day. Instead, we gradually move in that direction – through various life-experiences, articles, videos and self-reflection. This process takes time, sometimes decades.
3. Flawed as Carlson’s racial views might be, they’re a lot closer to the truth than most of his rivals.

Bearing these facts in mind, we can view the journey to truth as a conveyor belt. Taking an example that’s familiar to most of us, let’s say you’re at the grocery store checkout line. The time has come to place your groceries on the conveyor belt – but you stop cold.

Why should I place my groceries on the belt right here? It’s several feet away from the cashier. This makes no sense! Either I place my groceries on the belt right next to the cashier or not at all!

We can view people like Tucker Carlson, Anne Coulter, Lauren Southern, Thomas Sowell, Pat Buchanan and many more as figures who occupy the conveyor belt farthest away from the cashier. They’re not us, but they provide inspiration, and guidance, to many people who need to break away from the shackles of Cultural Marxism. Once free from the mental slavery of Cultural Marxism, some will continue to break down other hurdles on their path to intellectual freedom. It’s all part of the process of growing up – and we shouldn’t expect people to do it all at once, neither should we condemn those who provide intermediate steps.

This is not to say we shouldn’t debate them. We certainly should, but let’s not condemn them, fling nasty epithets at them, or undermine their authority. They do useful work, and we should promote them for that. At the same time, we should point out the flaws in their world-view.

I suspect some of them are fully aware of the falsehoods they spew, but life is full of compromises. We must do what’s practical. Check comments below for Diversity Chronicle’s responses.