Today I was approached by two black tall migrants. They spoke incoherently and I told them to back off. Eventually one of them grabbed my ass. I punched him in the guts immediately and splashed energy drink on the other one. I was alone, but fortunately that startled them enough to fvck off instead of chasing after me. This could have ended very badly. I no longer feel safe in Europe and the reason are not straight white men.
I understand black Americans celebrating their ancestors’ freedom from slavery. That makes sense, and I don’t begrudge them their day.
I, however, do begrudge that history being used to explain today’s outcome differences it has nothing to do with. Therein lies the problem with trying to integrate the descendants of formerly enslaved people into your populace. Many will always harbor resentment, and many will always use that history as an excuse. There’s no indication either is significantly letting up as time passes.
The man most associated with freeing America’s slaves, Abraham Lincoln, recognized the strained history between Blacks and Whites would cause conflict, and thus it would be best for the parties to be separated. Lincoln, however, recognized that the natural differences between the two groups would also lead to conflict and outcome differences.
Addressing a black audience Lincoln said:
“You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated.”
Today, many won’t make the admission Lincoln called for, even if they recognize there’s truth to it. On the contrary, many denounce any suggestion of that truth as racism and a desire to return to slavery. In reality, nobody wants slavery to return, but some, both black and white, do want the separation Lincoln suggested was best for both parties.
Therein lies the irony of Juneteenth. We celebrate people being freed from a system that enslaved them as we entrap people in a system today some wish they were free from. Woke folk yearn for a multi-racial Utopia void of racists. They could have that today if they merely let “the racists”, both black and white separatists, have respective lands where they control their own destiny. Globalists won’t allow that, however, because their ideology is a supremacist one which seeks to conquer all people under it.
So celebrate Juneteenth, Freedom Day, but recognize that many people today don’t have the level of freedom they yearn for. They’re enslaved in a system that treats Whites as tax slaves to fund a multiracial Utopia that’ll always be fraught with tension.
And what do Whites get out of that?
Nothing.
While other groups are uplifted via white tax money and by virtue of living in a majority white society there’s no actual benefit for Whites. Instead, their neighborhoods become less safe, their schools worse, and their opportunities reduced in the name of diversity. They’re vilified if they object to any of that. Hell, they’re vilified just for existing. How can one expect people to happily exist like that?
My personal history with nudity is a complex one. When I encountered nudity as a teenager, it bothered me. I wasn’t used to it. Had I been used to it from an early age, it wouldn’t have bothered me. If adults make an issue out of nudity, then it becomes an issue for kids. There are places in the world where nudity is the norm. I saw it in Africa, and there are nudist colonies in the Western world. I’ve been to clothing-optional beaches – and kids are allowed. This may be shocking to some of y’all, but nothing bad happens to those kids as a result of being exposed to nudity. Nudity doesn’t hurt kids – unless it’s done in a malicious way.
A child, raised with casual nudity, or whose parents don’t make it into an issue, will not have problems as a result…
One man in Oregon disagrees:
Tiktoker claims a n*ked man came up to his 2-year-old kid and exposed himself. He called the cops who said it’s not a crime. This happened in Oregon. Wtf? pic.twitter.com/hw9mWSkzW1
Trespassing is illegal if posted. Trespassing while naked is problematic; it’s a crazy and inconsiderate thing to do – but it doesn’t break any laws in Oregon (at least, not in Portland). I wasn’t there. I could be that the naked man did expose himself in a sexual way, which would make it illegal. More likely, he’s got mental issues, and he’s simply wandering about naked. I’ve seen this happen in Portland. People pretty much ignore it. Some will shake their heads.
Confession time. I’ve been casually nude in Portland. The weather was hot, and I didn’t have a bathing suit. I did what millions of OUR ANCESTORS did for thousands of years: I stripped down and jumped in the water. This was normal for most of human history. It’s normal now in many places.
Were there people around? Yes, there were. Were some of them children? Not in my immediate vicinity; I definitely would not have stripped down if there was a child nearby, because I would have no way of knowing what that child is accustomed to, or the attitudes of its parents. I didn’t want a confrontation, just a swim.
What if I was not so sensitive, and didn’t care if there were children around? It still wouldn’t be illegal. Inappropriate? Maybe. It would have been a good idea to at least ask the parents if they cared.
The father in the video is probably a good man; he thinks he is protecting his child. In reality, his hysteria is causing more harm to his child than the nudity itself. The child would be a lot better off if the father simply turned to him, chuckled, and said, “I think that naked man has some issues. I’d better tell him to leave our property. How about a game of ball?”
If you scroll through the comments on Twitter, you’ll see a lot of, “I’m a conservative, and conservatives are supposed to hate this sort of thing DAMMIT!!” You’ll see a lot of, “Those damn LEFTIES are at it again!! I hate lefties, and I hate public nudity!!” Some comments even equate casual nudity with grooming, as if it’s the same thing. It’s not.
If God hated nudity, He wouldn’t have us be born naked.
I wasn’t expecting it to happen so soon; it’s not even officially summer, and yet this is what greeted me at my local supermarket this morning:
Yes, those are Dragon Fruits, known as “Pitahaya” here in Dominican Republic. Here’s my first one of the year:
Tradition says that if your first Pitahaya is red, you will have a prosperous and healthy year…
Okay, I just made that up. It was tasty, and considering how early it is in the year, I did have my apprehensions.
They are costly, so I’m considering cutting costs to fit them into my budget. My religion requires it. The ancient Jewish sages said, “He who passes up a good fruit will have to answer to God.” I didn’t make that one up.
Years ago, I established that Dragon Fruit is the best fruit in the world. This fact has not changed; it will ALWAYS be the best fruit in the world.
I have decided to make this day, June 4th, official Dragon Fruit Day (Dia de Pitahaya). If you can acquire Dragon Fruit in your area, I recommend you do so, and make sure to consume some on this auspicious day. If you don’t live in the tropics, then I pity you – because you’ll probably get an inferior Dragon Fruit.
One of my favorite street dogs was a pit bull. The dog would walk up to me, as I was sitting at a nearby cafe, and put her head on my lap. She would roll her eyes up to me in such a way that I had no choice but to pet her. Behind those massive jaws and muscular build was a bundle of love and affection. I haven’t seen her since last year, and I suspect the worst. People are intimidated by pit bulls, and for good reason. Still, my heart aches when I think of what might have happened to her; I hope she found a good home.
Pit bulls are, of course, used for fighting. Owners will clip their ears so that the opponent dog will have less to latch onto. There are other reasons for clipping the ears, but reduced vulnerability, during scuffles or fights, is high on the list.
It’s fairly common knowledge that black Africans, of the more pure variety, have tiny ears and large jaws. Where I live, there are many examples of these. Some of the Haitians I come across are excellent examples of this. I’ve seen Haitians who look like they might have jumped out of the pages of an anthropology book on archaic hominids. For those who notice, it can be shocking, even jolting – but the modern mind is trained to gloss over this.
These traits are undeniable; anybody can see them – and the usual explanation is that they’re merely vestigial traits from earlier times, that they mean nothing in practical terms.
I disagree. Higher testosterone levels, and clearly observed higher levels of aggressiveness, point to advantages to larger jaws and smaller ears. Not only that, but we can include thicker skulls and even short, kinky, hair to the list.
It’s true that kinky hair serves to dissipate heat, and that Australian Aborigines do not have this trait, and they had to deal with cold – implying that the primary benefit of this hair is indeed to protect against heat. I think that a secondary benefit might have been for fighting. It’s possible that the hair didn’t grow long in earlier times, and hence, there was less to latch onto.
I believe that African blacks have used their large jaws for fighting – much like Mike Tyson – and, of course, the ears present a good target:
To the unbiased, unindoctrinated, observer, the African black (Negroes) are designed for vicious street fighting, and their thicker skulls are designed to withstand the “Ghetto Stomp.”
This is not to say that they will win every fight against members of other races, but they do seem to be built for it.
Trump was found “guilty” on trumped up charges, and his base is energized. Donations are pouring in for his presidential campaign, and the anger at a corrupt system is palpable.
Trump’s enemies are also energized. Criminals, such as Nancy Pelosi and Ilhan Omar, are rejoicing that “the rule of law” has prevailed.
I’ve never been a huge supporter of Trump, but it’s very important that he wins the upcoming election. If he doesn’t, we will end up with a Marxist Supreme Court that lacks even a shred of respect for the Constitution.
At, or near, the top of the leftist wish list is the official implementation of hate-speech laws. A Marxist Supreme court will argue that “hate-speech” is similar to yelling “FIRE” in a crowded theater. It will also argue that “hate-speech” is incitement to violence – and it will be made clear, either explicitly or in practice, that “hate-speech” against Whites is allowed – not only allowed but required.
Prices will continue to skyrocket, crime will continue to rise, millions of violent invaders will continue to pour into the Western world and corrupt politicians/bureaucrats will continue to be “elected” and appointed. The ignorant masses will continue to blame all this on racism from Whites and the legacy of a “White-supremacist nation and infrastructure.”
The various member nations of the Soviet Union emerged from 70 years of Communist rule demographically intact (more or less). The new Communists of the West will not allow this to happen.
I don’t think Trump can stop this, but he can at least slow things down, perhaps giving us time to organize. I urge all of my readers to vote for Trump if you can.
Whether Trump wins or loses, armed conflict is inevitable – if any vestige of Western civilization is to survive.
It’s time for one of my insightful, but likely unoriginal, observations.
If you move to the tropics, you’ll soon find out that food doesn’t last very long here. Even if refrigerated, things go bad pretty quickly.
My solution was to invest in a variety of airtight plastic containers. This helped a lot.
Before the days of refrigeration (or the discovery of other means of food preservation), the best option would have been to share the food. This serves two purposes: It avoids waste, and it promotes goodwill. The person you shared your food with is likely to do the same for you in the future. As an added benefit, he’s less likely to chop you to pieces.
This applies to all hunter-gatherer societies. When ancient Europeans killed a mammoth, and there was too much meat for the small band or village, they might have invited a neighboring village to come over and feast with them and take some of the meat back to their own village.
That was a long time ago, but the tropics are still the tropics to this day. Food-sharing is an important part of Dominican culture, more so than what I’d seen in the US. I suspect this is true in most tropical cultures.
One of the benefits of living in a poor country is that one has plenty of opportunities to give food to hungry people. Unlike so many of the homeless in the US, poor people here are likely to thank you profusely if you give them leftover food – and they’ll scarf it up. There are even one or two gringos I know of who will do this; it’s not just locals.
In the Dissident Right, we often speak of “high-trust societies.” What most of us have in mind is societies like Europe (pre-invasion) and Japan. I must point out that, in some ways, Dominican Republic is a “high-trust society.” If you give leftover food to a homeless person in the US, he’ll probably throw it out; there are sick, cruel, people who will poison or contaminate the food, and then give it to a homeless person. Nobody seems to worry about that here. Perhaps, if somebody did that, locals would remember his face and deal with him appropriately. On several occasions, I’ve forgotten things (even a wallet), and it was still there when I returned, or somebody picked it up and gave it back to me – and I’m not implying that Dominican Republic is just like Japan. Not by a longshot. What I am saying is that, poor and backward as it is, there is still a large reservoir of trust and kindness. If you travel anywhere in the third world, be careful and vigilant, but also look for the positive – because you’ll find it.
Australian Associated Press is the beating heart of Australian news. AAP is Australia’s only independent national newswire and has been delivering accurate, reliable and fast news content to the media industry, government and corporate sector for 85 years. We keep Australia informed.
The AAP was “accurate and reliable” when it came to a quote from London mayor Sadiq Khan. He supposedly said:
Terror attacks are ‘part and parcel of living in a big city’
The AAP took less than a month to correct an Australian user’s Facebook post, and to set the record straight:
The genesis of the Facebook post dates back to September 18, 2016 when London Mayor Sadiq Khan was quoted by London’s Evening Standard in response to an explosion in New York that injured 29 people.
In a video for a story headlined, “New York explosion: Sadiq Khan says terror attacks are ‘part and parcel of life in a big city’”, Mr Khan said: “Part and parcel of living in a great global city is you’ve got to be prepared for these things, you’ve got to be vigilant, you’ve got to support the police doing an incredibly hard job, you got to support the security services.”
Thank you for that service AAP. Conservatives and Trump supporters aren’t always accurate in their claims – and neither is the Establishment Left…
For example, the claim that Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people.” That claim was so grotesquely inaccurate that even some American factcheckers admitted that it “has inaccuracies.”
What about AAP? It uses the common leftist strategy of simply ignoring the claim, rather than debunking it. I searched for a factcheck for this claim on AAP’s website and came up empty.
I did a few other searches, and still got no results.
How convenient! A “trusted, accurate and reliable” factchecker only checks claims that will support its narrative when debunked.
I sent AAP an email:
Dear sirs,
I’ve seen it claimed, by very reputable news sources, that after the Charlottesville protest/riot Trump called the neo-Nazis “very fine people.”
Trump denied it, saying he wasn’t referring to the neo-Nazis in the group.
