I know that some of y’all are Jewish. A few of us, on X, have decided to start a pro-White Jewish group. Tentatively, it looks like this might take the form of a website where various Jews can post content pertaining to White-positivity and White interests.
We haven’t picked a name yet. Suggestions are welcome. Many questions remain as to the nature of this group/site.
My vision is, aside from the above, that it become a kernel for a movement. The problem with websites and blogs is that there is very little participation. Most people, even if they’re sympathetic, have little interest in actually participating. One reason I don’t want to use this blog is that I don’t want it to be dominated by just one or two people. This is my personal blog.
I had an argument with a leftist on Quora recently. He claimed that The Great Replacement is a “far-right myth.” I countered with some sources and an article from Amren, explaining what we mean by The Great Replacement; I had told him that he probably has no idea what we mean by the term, and that he therefore cannot claim that it’s a myth. This is how he defined it:
It means that the so called “elites” have allegedly a “plan” to replace white people in European countries and America by brown-skinned foreigners from Africa, Arab countries, Asia and South/Middle America. That is extreme right-wing racist bullshit spread for at least the last ten years, coming initially from Russian propaganda channels.
The extreme right-wing in Israel is also bought in by this BS.
This was my response:
No. That’s a cartoonish/Protocols of the Elder of Zion type understanding of the Great Replacement. Fact: For the most part, the ruling elites hate White people as a group. They make no secret of it, and they’ve been very outspoken about it. Fact: Elites CELEBRATE the demographic changes that are making Whites a minority all over the world. Fact: White ARE decreasing in number and political clout all over the West – after decades of being encouraged to have fewer kids.
Now they’re being forced to subsidize the large families of non-White immigrants. A person needs to be a special kind of naive to believe that the elites, who openly hate Whites, have nothing to do with immigration policies that make Whites a minority. We don’t claim that there is a single “plan” at work here, and that a bunch of “Elders of Zion” (so to speak) sit around a table discussing how to exterminate Whites. There are many localized plans that seem to work toward that end ultimately. Here. This may help.
We can turn the tables on Great Replacement deniers:
Leftist: The Great Replacement theory says that there’s an elite cabal that has a plan to replace White people with non-Whites.
Let’s apply this thinking to “Systemic Racism” (toward non-Whites).
“Systemic Racism” is a far-left conspiracy theory that there’s an elite cabal that coordinates a plan to discriminate against non-Whites, especially blacks.
Not many leftists would accept this definition; they’d characterize it as “cartoonish” and unrealistic. Instead, they’d explain to us that Systemic Racism (AKA “Structural Racism”) is much more complicated than that. It’s a societal result of a) historic injustices, b) legacy prejudices and c) subconscious behaviors and attitudes that reinforce anti-POC discrimination. The end result is “Systemic Racism!”
It’s similar with The Great Replacement – with one major difference: All of the “evidence” cited in favor of anti-POC “Systemic Racism” can be attributed to Innate racial differences, cultural differences and backlash against preferential treatment. There IS NO Systemic Racism against non-Whites in the Western world today. but there absolutely IS a Great Replacement occurring. Evidence of The Great Replacement is before our very eyes, and quantifiable with many statistics.
There are no powerful or influential people in the Western world who espouse hatred toward non-Whites. There are no laws or policies targeting non-Whites – but there are plenty of powerful people publicly rejoicing at the demographic decline of White people, and there are plenty of laws and policies targeting Whites.
There may not be a council of elites, similar to the “Elders of Zion” conspiring to replace White people wherever they are. There certainly are entrenched attitudes and policies that inexorably lead to White replacement. This ideological infrastructure is reinforced by various forms of official propaganda, legacy media (also propaganda), the education system, churches, many large corporations and a variety of NGOs.
One might argue that the ideology that led to The Great Replacement had its origin in the Frankfurt School, a group of (mainly) Jewish Marxists that fled Germany with the rise of Hitler. It’s also possible that groups such as the WMF, and even influential people in the EU, are working toward The Great Replacement. However, we should acknowledge The Great Replacement even if there is no cohesive group of elites behind it. At this point, it doesn’t need any actual leadership, since it runs on momentum. Anybody who steps out of line is instantly branded a “racist” and his influence is diminished. He might even be arrested or fined, especially in Canada and Europe.
“Systemic Racism” against non-Whites is a myth. The Great Replacement is a fact.
Soon after woke terminology emerged on the scene, anti-woke *sophisticates* began labeling the right as woke or snowflakes for merely noting anti-white/anti-male rhetoric as if merely giving a voice to observations put them in the same camp as the DEI/woke/snowflake crowd. This dynamic struck me as their attempt to differentiate themselves from their less sophisticated/educated anti-woke brethren ESPECIALLY those on the right. They noticeably reserved their most intense animus/disgust for this group as if to say that their was only ONE way to combat woke ideology. THEIR way & often insisted on a delicate more academic approach. This anti-woke *sophisticate* group peppered their pronouncements with declarations of their liberal bonafides in contrast to others who were saying the SAME THINGS. Meet the minimizer cohort.
Racism allegations only increase, not decrease, as a country diversifies because "racism" becomes any opinion a white person holds that differs from what the growing minority wants. This is every political discussion going forward… pic.twitter.com/cTU8daEq4k
Piers Morgan is an imbecile and an establishment lackey. Here we see him becoming upset that a black man is calling him a “racist.” Well guess what Piers. The establishment narrative that you support includes the premise that all Whites are racists – and you’re White!
At around the 35-second mark, you’ll hear him claim that a Palestinian life has the same value as an Israeli life. Speaking in general terms, this is preposterous.
The claim that “all lives have equal value” is an empty platitude; nobody actually believes it.
Here’s a thought experiment: Ask a leftist if he would kill a White slave owner or the slave if he had to kill one of them. Obviously, he’ll choose to kill the slave owner, and no amount of mental gymnastics could hide the fact that the leftist considers the life of the slave to be more valuable than the life of the slave owner. In fact, some leftists would even go so far as to have ALL “racists” killed if they could; they don’t value the lives of “racists” very much at all.
There are plenty of examples we could throw at conservatives as well – and at people from all political spectra. Nobody truly believes that all lives have equal value.
Generally speaking, Israeli lives have greater value than Gazan lives. Gazans are programed, from an early age, into genocidal hate and bigotry. Israelis generally are not – though some do feel this way. Gazans treat animals very poorly, and they treat women very poorly – and they treat sexual minorities very poorly. Israelis are the opposite, with some exceptions of course.
Whose life is worth more, that of a narrow-minded, hateful, bigot, or that of an educated and tolerant individual? This would be a good place to include an interview I just listened to, and I encourage y’all to spend the 2 hours listening to it as well. It’s very enlightening:
Listen to the above interview, and you’ll grasp the immense chasm that separates Israeli society from Palestinian (specifically Gazan) society.
Again, I emphasize that I’m speaking in generalities here. Obviously, individuals will vary. For example, Mosab Hassan Yousef’s life obviously has tremendous value.
Let’s stop pretending, and acknowledge the fact that killing Gazans, even civilians, is justified if it needs to be done in order to prevent future massacres of Israelis. The death of Gazan children is a sad affair, but it’s not as sad as the death of Israelis.
Note to my fellow White-Nationalists/advocates:
How can you side with the Gazans, against the Israelis, when Israel embodies most of the positive aspects of Western (read WHITE) civilization, while Gaza represents the exact opposite? Don’t let your hatred toward Jews blind you to the difference between a society of educated, advanced, people versus a society of savages.
Greg Johnson, author of The White Nationalist Manifesto and other important works, recently tweeted this response:
By “extended family,” I assume Dr. Johnson means all the other Jews in Britain.
I don’t agree with Dr. Johnson that all the Jews in Britain should be expelled – just the leftist ones, the ones who worked so hard for the destruction of Britain.
Apparently, Lee kern is one of those Jews. He tweeted:
In the first tweet, quoted above, Lee kern writes:
I’ll be fine in Israel It’s the most dynamic, creative and positive place I’ve ever been – even though surrounded by Islamic fundamentalist psychopaths who daily try to destroy it…
From this, we can conclude that Lee kern doesn’t like Islamic fundamentalist psychopaths…
Like this one, for example:
Let me introduce you to the new councillor in Leeds.
— Tommy Robinson ?? (@TRobinsonNewEra) May 4, 2024
How on Earth did such an Islamic fundamentalist get elected in Leeds? It’s because people like Lee kern believed that it’s better to allow “migrants” (AKA invaders) to settle in Britain rather than let them drown.
I disagree. They should not only be ALLOWED to drown, but the royal navy should do its job and actively sink those boats. After a few get sunk, it would no longer be a problem.
For a “progressive,” Lee kern is quite binary; he believes there are only two options for boat migrants:
Let them drown
Allow them into Britain, and then feed them, house them, provide free medical care, and give them preferential treatment over natives.
Actually, there’s a third option: Turn the boats around, and force them to return to France. Let the French deal with them. Yet another option would be to allow them in, and then arrest them all – to be flown back to somewhere in Africa. I don’t like this last option, because it’s too expensive.
He’ll probably never see it, and even if he did, he’d retort with a canned leftist response:
Britain’s problems have NOTHING TO DO with immigration. We NEED immigrants. It’s RACISTS like YOU who create a toxic environment for them. White Britons commit crime too – so it makes no sense for you to bring up migrant crime…
We’ve all heard it a million times. Such claims were nonsense the first time, and they’re nonsense today.
Anyway, congratulations Lee Kern, for being number 7 in this series. Our sages said, kol shevi’een Habibeen – All sevenths are beloved… beloved to somebody, I’m sure. Not to me.
I’ve already posted about my experiences with forced-busing in the ghetto, but there’s one story I haven’t shared yet – until now!
Prepare yourselves for major cringe…
I was in a class of about 35 “students,” almost all of when were inner-city blacks. That’s a polite way of saying, “they were crude, primitive and prone to violence.”
We had a substitute teacher one day. She was a young White woman, apparently fresh out of college, and very idealistic. At some point during class, she did the unthinkable.
She placed an object on her desk, and announced to the class that everybody was to concentrate on the object – and that we were going to make it levitate with the power of our minds.
What she failed to account for was the fact that (aside from yours truly) there weren’t enough IQs in that class to budge a feather, even if the wind was blowing. Needless to say, the object stayed put. The experiment had failed. I was so embarrassed for her. There was some snickering and whispering.
We never saw her again. I hope she’s moved on from her foolishness.
There were already several “White-positive” spaces on Quora – but every single one of them contained negative material toward other races and groups. In the case of “It’s Okay to be White,” it was started with the goal, and guideline, that negativity toward other races would not be tolerated. Unfortunately, that original vision seems to have been lost. I wrote about this in my previous post. This one, which will be under my own personal administration and moderation, will hold true to this vision.
Important topics and conversations are still posted at IOTBW, and I won’t discourage anybody from reading it or contributing. As it stands, I’m still a moderator there.
If you’re so inclined, visit my new space and follow it. We’ll see how it goes.
Only two opinions are allowed regarding blacks: That they don’t commit more crime, or that they DO commit more crime, but their poverty provides a valid excuse for it. In contrast, Whites hold full responsibility for their crimes, real or imagined. No excuses.
Here’s my comment:
I’m confused… Blacks commit more crime due to poverty – but they DON’T commit more crime, and if you think they do, then you can’t serve as judge.
Leftists are divided on whether blacks actually commit more crime. It’s still considered acceptable to say that they do, but it’s due to poverty.
Apparently, it’s not acceptable for judges (who, of all people, should know) to hold that opinion. If we looked hard enough, we’d probably find a retired judge who recognizes the fact that blacks commit more crime because of their GENES. Key word, “retired.” Even then, he might fear for his safety and the safety of his family. In Stalinist America, it’s not safe to speak the truth if you have a known face and address. Being a nobody, such as yours truly, does offer some measure of security.
This decision, and others like it, sets a dangerous precedent: Members of more criminal races (IE. blacks and mestizos) can act with impunity, and White people are legally held to a higher standard – on account of White peoples’ law-abiding nature.
Let’s apply this principle to gender. Men are far more likely to be arrested, charged and convicted for rape than women. This must be due to sexism against men. Therefore, all excess rape convictions of men (above the conviction-rate for women) must be discarded. Equity!
Jews, I will be blunt here, dont know it will get accepted or not.
I could criticize Islam and expect a decent disucssion and rebuttal from a Moslem than, criticizing Israel when i face constant abuses from Jews and threat to my career. Jews can literally screw your career for criticizing their Judeofilth state
Lets be honest here, Jews have for years being the real enemy of Whites, behind the scenes. its their way of extracting revenge from us for Holocaust.
They screwed middle east, pulling America in endless wars, only later to promote immigration of arabs in Europe and US. Its their way of destorying our western white civilization
I thought we’d made it clear that criticism of ANYBODY is allowed, including Jews and Judaism, but that we need to be fair, nuanced and professional about it.
… and then this follow up comment:
“Any Jew apologist comment here will be deleted.”
The submission poster’s name? “ZyclonedSteins-Marx.”
The moderator who accepted it? An open neo-Nazi.
I haven’t been doing much moderating recently, and this is a big reason why; I feel like I’m pissing against the tide. It’s discouraging and demoralizing, and I feel like it’s a losing battle.
Sure, we have a lot of followers now. So does The Daily Stormer, and Stormfront. Nobody’s making money off of the space, so our goal shouldn’t be getting the biggest number of followers, but producing QUALITY content – content that’s WHITE POSITIVE, not bashing other groups, such as blacks or Jews. At this point, very little distinguishes IOTBW from just another neo-Nazi site.
Either do a major purge, and return to the original stated concept, or continue into the abyss. I’m not getting into a moderator war, and I can’t fight this battle alone.
Yes, I know that our enemies will use this post against us. A healthy attitude would be to accept that – and recognize valid criticism as an opportunity for improvement. Not everything our enemies say is automatically wrong. We’re supposed to be better than that – and we should learn from our enemies…
… such as Muslims. Muslims use a multi-pronged approach to world-conquest. They use violence*, peaceful persuasion, “love-jihad,” financial pressure and the arts in their quest. They’re very successful. If every pro-White venue has a neo-Nazi character, then people will equate White-positivity with neo-Nazism. We need to show them that there’s a better way, that there’s room in our movement for those who are NOT neo-Nazis.
Can IOTBW be that venue?
*I’m not condoning violence here, simply pointing out that the multi-pronged Muslim approach is very inclusive.
If you watch this interview until the end, you’ll see that the two men refuse to acknowledge biological race. Tucker Carlson even says, “race is not interesting.”
It SHOULD be interesting, because unless we break the taboo of confronting biological race (particularly racial differences in average IQ), the Establishment Left will continue to cite racial disparities as “evidence” of systemic racism against blacks and mestizos.
It’s ironic that the show is called “uncensored,” and that they supposedly promote the breaking of taboos – yet they continue to be willfully ignorant about the one subject that destroys their enemy’s arguments: The fact that we’re NOT all the same.
Ep. 98 There is systemic racism in the United States, against whites. Everyone knows it. Nobody says it. How come? pic.twitter.com/hSrU9BPVb4
In other news. I submitted a question to a leftist space on Quora:
Leftists tend to attribute personal traits to environment rather than genetics.
Against this backdrop, how much influence does environment have on sexual orientation, particularly homosexuality and transsexualism?
I wasn’t terribly surprised that my submission was rejected. After all, it’s a leading question. The answer is that environment might, indeed, play a large role in influencing people (children) into becoming homosexual or transsexual. In other words, grooming works, and this is why it’s done.
To leftists: If environment plays a significant role in influences sexual orientation, then you’re groomers. If genetics plays a significant role in influencing personality, then this would include IQ, aggressiveness and time-preference. In other words, you’re a “racist.” Of course, both could be true.
