Do Blacks Commit More Crime?

I’ll start with this Tweet from Frank DeScushin:

Only two opinions are allowed regarding blacks: That they don’t commit more crime, or that they DO commit more crime, but their poverty provides a valid excuse for it. In contrast, Whites hold full responsibility for their crimes, real or imagined. No excuses.

Here’s my comment:

I’m confused… Blacks commit more crime due to poverty – but they DON’T commit more crime, and if you think they do, then you can’t serve as judge.

Leftists are divided on whether blacks actually commit more crime. It’s still considered acceptable to say that they do, but it’s due to poverty.

Apparently, it’s not acceptable for judges (who, of all people, should know) to hold that opinion. If we looked hard enough, we’d probably find a retired judge who recognizes the fact that blacks commit more crime because of their GENES. Key word, “retired.” Even then, he might fear for his safety and the safety of his family. In Stalinist America, it’s not safe to speak the truth if you have a known face and address. Being a nobody, such as yours truly, does offer some measure of security.

This decision, and others like it, sets a dangerous precedent: Members of more criminal races (IE. blacks and mestizos) can act with impunity, and White people are legally held to a higher standard – on account of White peoples’ law-abiding nature.

Let’s apply this principle to gender. Men are far more likely to be arrested, charged and convicted for rape than women. This must be due to sexism against men. Therefore, all excess rape convictions of men (above the conviction-rate for women) must be discarded. Equity!

Look for similar laws in Oregon and Washington. Washington State already has a racial two-tiered justice system.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , | 4 Comments

My Critique of It’s Okay to be White on Quora

I just posted this on the IOTBW moderator space in Quora:

Is this what IOTBW is now about?

White Quorans: Who’s treated you worse? Whites or minorities?

Jews, I will be blunt here, dont know it will get accepted or not.

I could criticize Islam and expect a decent disucssion and rebuttal from a Moslem than, criticizing Israel when i face constant abuses from Jews and threat to my career. Jews can literally screw your career for criticizing their Judeofilth state

Lets be honest here, Jews have for years being the real enemy of Whites, behind the scenes. its their way of extracting revenge from us for Holocaust.

They screwed middle east, pulling America in endless wars, only later to promote immigration of arabs in Europe and US. Its their way of destorying our western white civilization

I thought we’d made it clear that criticism of ANYBODY is allowed, including Jews and Judaism, but that we need to be fair, nuanced and professional about it.

… and then this follow up comment:

“Any Jew apologist comment here will be deleted.”

The submission poster’s name? “ZyclonedSteins-Marx.”

The moderator who accepted it? An open neo-Nazi.

I haven’t been doing much moderating recently, and this is a big reason why; I feel like I’m pissing against the tide. It’s discouraging and demoralizing, and I feel like it’s a losing battle.

Sure, we have a lot of followers now. So does The Daily Stormer, and Stormfront. Nobody’s making money off of the space, so our goal shouldn’t be getting the biggest number of followers, but producing QUALITY content – content that’s WHITE POSITIVE, not bashing other groups, such as blacks or Jews. At this point, very little distinguishes IOTBW from just another neo-Nazi site.

Either do a major purge, and return to the original stated concept, or continue into the abyss. I’m not getting into a moderator war, and I can’t fight this battle alone.

Yes, I know that our enemies will use this post against us. A healthy attitude would be to accept that – and recognize valid criticism as an opportunity for improvement. Not everything our enemies say is automatically wrong. We’re supposed to be better than that – and we should learn from our enemies…

… such as Muslims. Muslims use a multi-pronged approach to world-conquest. They use violence*, peaceful persuasion, “love-jihad,” financial pressure and the arts in their quest. They’re very successful. If every pro-White venue has a neo-Nazi character, then people will equate White-positivity with neo-Nazism. We need to show them that there’s a better way, that there’s room in our movement for those who are NOT neo-Nazis.

Can IOTBW be that venue?

*I’m not condoning violence here, simply pointing out that the multi-pronged Muslim approach is very inclusive.

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | Tagged | 2 Comments

Tucker Carlson: “Race is not interesting”

If you watch this interview until the end, you’ll see that the two men refuse to acknowledge biological race. Tucker Carlson even says, “race is not interesting.”

It SHOULD be interesting, because unless we break the taboo of confronting biological race (particularly racial differences in average IQ), the Establishment Left will continue to cite racial disparities as “evidence” of systemic racism against blacks and mestizos.

It’s ironic that the show is called “uncensored,” and that they supposedly promote the breaking of taboos – yet they continue to be willfully ignorant about the one subject that destroys their enemy’s arguments: The fact that we’re NOT all the same.

In other news. I submitted a question to a leftist space on Quora:

Leftists tend to attribute personal traits to environment rather than genetics.

Against this backdrop, how much influence does environment have on sexual orientation, particularly homosexuality and transsexualism?

I wasn’t terribly surprised that my submission was rejected. After all, it’s a leading question. The answer is that environment might, indeed, play a large role in influencing people (children) into becoming homosexual or transsexual. In other words, grooming works, and this is why it’s done.

To leftists: If environment plays a significant role in influences sexual orientation, then you’re groomers. If genetics plays a significant role in influencing personality, then this would include IQ, aggressiveness and time-preference. In other words, you’re a “racist.” Of course, both could be true.

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, nurture vs. nature and I.Q., racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Are Muslims in Britain British?

Corporate news organizations say “YES:”

Given the above, one would think that most Muslims would be proud to fly the Union Flag, and they certainly wouldn’t have a problem with Native Britons flying it in their presence. After all, Islam and the Union Flag go together like peanut butter and jelly.

Alas, this doesn’t seem to be the case:

Here we see the truth: Muslims, or at least many of them, constitute an occupying force in Britain – and the British police are complicit. They are traitors.

One might argue that the display of the Union Flag, under such circumstances, might be considered “provocation,” but the young men hadn’t interacted with anybody. For all the protesters knew, they were there to SUPPORT their cause, and show that Britain stands with them. The fact that the crowd took the opposite view shows their true colors.

Posted in freedom of speech issues, government/corporate discrimination against whites, immigration/ Hispanics, Muslims | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Blacks Should NOT be Allowed on Juries

“Blacks should NOT be allowed on juries.”

Do you think that’s a racist statement? It’s not racist at all. I’ve made other statements, on this blog, that are indeed racist – which doesn’t mean they are any less true. However, the above statement is not racist.

When we allow blacks on juries, specifically for racially charged crimes, what we’re actually doing is allowing blacks to get away with murder:

This has a little to do with the low average-IQ of blacks, which makes them more susceptible to antiwhite indoctrination, but it has more to do with the CRT dogma that permeates Western society today.

Under certain circumstances, a multi-racial society might work. We don’t have those circumstances. Instead, we have corporate media, education system, government and corporate world that conspire to foment as much antiwhite sentiment as they can.

The result is a contaminated black jury pool. With today’s political climate, all black jurors are suspect – and I’m not saying a black jury CAN’T be impartial. It can happen, and I actually knew a black man who was part of such a jury. That’s what he told us, and having known him well, I believe him. We can’t depend on black juries to be impartial when somebody’s life is at stake, or when a murderer would be set free – as in the O.J. case.

In a just and reasonable society, White defendants should be able to cite the above video in order to exclude black jurors, and so should prosecutors when the defendant is black and the victim White.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Low IQ on Display

Ladies and gentlemen, this is what happens when you indoctrinate a low-IQ population into believing that they’re oppressed:

I haven’t done the math, but 2niac did. Here’s his comment:

[!!!]—>>> $200M for every black adult in US? So that would be $9.6 Quadrillion. – Which is 377 times more the US GDP – Out of 333 million people in US, each get $29 millionEvery human on earth would get $1.2 million – Would cover existing US Debt of $34 trillion 282 times Let’s count the amount provided for black people by white people who go to work & being taxed. I wonder what would be the amount from 1865 to 2024. Black unemployment is the highest in US from ALL of the ethnicities! So it’s #1 for that, however the White unemployment is the lowest from everybody… So White folks been paying those reparations for 159 years. Do they wonder how black people get Food Stamps, Housing, Medical & all other benefits? They think it just appears? No, white folks work, have multiple jobs & then bring home heavily reduced (taxed) checks since it covers all those benefits for blacks.

Never mind the fact that if every black American received that much money, the dollar would lose its value. A loaf of bread would cost thousands of dollars – and guess what? The inevitable inflation would then be blamed on White racism.

Posted in Africa and blacks, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Cumulative Effect of Genes Over Spacetime

I have a medical condition that has no name; it’s an intermittent burning sensation on the skin of my left elbow. It started a few months ago, and I’d assumed that it had something to do with my frequent exposure to salt-water. I swim in the ocean almost daily. There is no visible rash or discoloration. My assumption was that the thinner skin on that part of my body is more susceptible to the salt water.

Yesterday, I casually mentioned it to my mother, and she told me that she has the same condition (also on her left elbow), and so do several of my other relatives on her side of the family. It has nothing to do with salt-water; it’s clearly a genetic condition – and it appears to express itself only later in life.

In my early years, I’d assumed that we’re born with certain genetic dispositions, and that as we grow older, our environment takes an increasingly important role in our bodies and minds. Whatever habits we pick up, for better or worse, will impact our health. Our education, our travels, our reading, and whatever movies we watch, will all gradually shape our personalities – at the expense of whatever genetic package we were born with.

I was wrong, and the opposite is true. Our genes never go away; they continue to assert themselves – and it is THEY that determine, more often than we’d care to admit, what kind of person we grow into. Whether we like it or not, our genes shape our environment more than the other way around. We like to believe we’re agents of free-will, but the truth is that free-will is largely an illusion.

The power of our genes grows stronger with time, in a manner of speaking. I was thinking about this yesterday, after the conversation with mother, and it occurred to me that time and “space” have similar roles in amplifying the power of genes.

When I say “space,” I’m referring to large numbers of people/communities. Whatever traits our genes encourage will be amplified in a community that shares similar genes. My use of the term “Spacetime” is a shameless borrowing from quantum physics – but it is a similar concept. The cumulative effect applies whether the medium is time or number of individuals.

We’re used to thinking of evolution in terms of the individual. An individual with maladaptive genes is more likely to fail to produce offspring – but the same principle applies to communities/tribes/nations, only to a much greater extent. Since the effect of genes is amplified when large numbers of individuals share them, evolution can work more quickly and more brutally.

Witness the destruction of the West, which is occurring before our very eyes. Whatever genes are responsible for ethno-masochism are maladaptive. This means that communities where this gene set is common will adapt some form of democracy as their form of government. Open-borders and democracy will inevitably lead to the destruction of said society; it will simply be taken over by outsiders – outsiders who do NOT suffer from ethno-masochism.

The cumulative effect of genes can help us understand why different populations produce such vastly different types of societies – even when we can’t always discern large differences between individuals of the disparate populations.

Note that I am not a scientist, and my only “qualifications” are my own observations and reflections. Let my arguments stand, or fall, on their own merits.

Posted in pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Ambient Perception” and “Racism”

We can sometimes show a leftist how he’s wrong about something, but it’s almost impossible to turn him into a right-winger. This is because our opinions are not typically shaped by isolated incidents or experiences; they’re shaped by the totality of those experiences.

Our perception of reality is shaped by:

  1. Our personal experiences, as filtered through pre-conceived notions, accurate or not
  2. The experiences of others in our circle of friends and relatives, subject to the same caveat
  3. What we are taught in school and by our parents – subject to the same caveat
  4. What we read/see in “The News” heavily subject to the views of those reporting it
  5. What we read/see in movies, commercials, books, billboards etc. (the Mass Media) – regardless of whether those movies and books are represented as “fiction” or “non-fiction.” To our subconscious minds, it doesn’t make much of a difference; over time, the accumulated “experiences” of those novels and movies meld into one ecosystem of Ambient Perception.

Changing an ecosystem requires a lot more than simply replacing one tree or shrub; it requires massive efforts, and this is why it’s so difficult to change the world-view of a leftist. His Ambient Perception is shaped by his ecosystem of ideas, which have accumulated over the course of his entire life in most cases.

Today, I had a conversation with some relatives. They had visited a state in the South, and one of them commented, “racism is still very strong there!”

I didn’t want to get into an argument, because a single argument cannot change their ecosystem, but here’s what I wanted to ask:

Did you ASK the “racists” you encountered there WHY they’re not fond of black people?

Did you ASK them WHY they’re not fond of INDIANS?

In a different scenario, where I felt I could safely ask this question, I would do so. In this particular situation, there were two of them and only one of me. They would have simply shouted at me. No good would have come of it.

It’s a common theme. Leftist individuals will encounter what they perceive as “racism,” and they’ll condemn it – but rarely do they approach the offender and ask him why he feels that way. It’s the same with researchers. They’ll report statistics that, according to them, provide evidence of “racism,” but they don’t actually ASK the subjects why they won’t rent to black people, or why they avoid hiring them.

People who are truly interested in the truth will take the time to ask questions – and they will ask in a nice way, in order to understand. Those who seek the truth are willing to challenge their own ecosystem. They make a serious effort to look past their own Ambient Perception.

People who refuse to ask questions are not interested in the truth; all they want to do is condemn and pontificate.

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists, the South | Tagged , | 2 Comments

When do Black Murderers Deserve Harsh Punishment?

When do black murderers deserve harsh punishment, and no parole? When their victims are black women – of course!

A Change.org petition is asking authorities to revoke the bail of a black man who brutally murdered his black wife in front of their daughter. I hope the petition succeeds.

But I won’t sign it. I won’t sign it until, and unless, ALL black murderers are treated harshly. The system we have in place today is geared toward keeping black men out of prison. This is a higher priority than public safety, or the dignity of the victims.

When reading the petition, I knew that the murderer is black, even though his photo doesn’t appear on the petition page. Had he been White, it would have been framed as a racial issue.

Here is his photo:

From the petition page:

My sister Robin Simpson, was brutally murdered by her husband, Michael Simpson Jr. in Houston, TX. This horrific act of violence wasn’t just a murder; it was a savage act that involved stabbing her over 100 times and removing her heart, brain, gutted and mutilated her body, all while their 8-year-old daughter watched helplessly fearing for own life. He chased them through the house yielding a knife as he terrorized Robin to death.

All the while the Houston Police sat outside of her house as this happened. According to HPD, Lt. R. Willkens told FOX 26 Houston, Robin called the police about her husband running around the house with a knife having suicidal thoughts and they were pulling up as her call dropped. Robin called the police twice as she was being chased and attacked. The  one officer got there he waited outside the house for the other officer to arrive before they went out back. We want to know how long did it take  from her call till the first officer arrived till the 2nd officer arrived. How much time did Michael Simpson Jr her killer have to gut her body, take out her brain and heart?

I hope Robin Simpson’s family finds justice – but I will only lend my voice to a cause that includes the WHITE victims of black savagery. It’s likely that Simpson, and her family, all vote Democrat. I say this for two reasons:

  1. This tragedy was framed primarily within the framework of “domestic violence.” There is no mention of the lenient treatment violent criminals receive nationwide. If any of the affected victims were conservative, they would have framed the issue much more widely.
  2. They’re black, and the vast majority of blacks vote Democrat.

In the petition, Robin’s sister asks: “We want to know how long did it take from her call till the first officer arrived till the 2nd officer arrived.”

I want to know if they supported BLM, and “defund the police.” Maybe they didn’t, but it’s a fair question.

Too many blacks disparage, even attack, the justice system that Whites so painstakingly built – and then demand answers when that same system isn’t robust enough to deliver justice to them when they need it.

They wanted the police to respond more quickly. Did they support the police when the police were under attack nationwide?

They criticize the justice system for its leniency toward their relative’s murderer. Did they demand harsher punishment for violent criminals prior to this?

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Violent Behavior from Blacks has Always Been a Problem

Too many people, even White-advocates, have the impression that black violence only became a problem with the Civil Rights era. Even I once gave some credence to this notion.

While there is little doubt that black violence has gotten worse recently, due to CRT and constant encouragement from the hostile elite, it has always been with us – which is what one would expect, given that it’s partly genetic.

Here’s a Quora answer that illustrates this (edited for grammar and spelling):

Allen Frierson 

Older whites: Did you face any racism from blacks during the 1950s?

Going to grammar school was hell as well as walking to get to school. We had to cross a couple of railroad tracks to get to school. Sometimes there would be gangs of blacks trying to take lunch money, if you were lucky enough to have it. If not, it was a fight to get by; hard to whip that many. Almost an everyday thing. 3 of us went fishing one day we were around 10 yrs. old 6 blacks around 16–18 years old jumped us beat the crap out of us. If it wasn’t for an older black gentleman who was fishing there, they may have killed us. This was back in the 50’s. This sort of thing happened a lot.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence | Tagged , , | 2 Comments