Soon after woke terminology emerged on the scene, anti-woke *sophisticates* began labeling the right as woke or snowflakes for merely noting anti-white/anti-male rhetoric as if merely giving a voice to observations put them in the same camp as the DEI/woke/snowflake crowd. This dynamic struck me as their attempt to differentiate themselves from their less sophisticated/educated anti-woke brethren ESPECIALLY those on the right. They noticeably reserved their most intense animus/disgust for this group as if to say that their was only ONE way to combat woke ideology. THEIR way & often insisted on a delicate more academic approach. This anti-woke *sophisticate* group peppered their pronouncements with declarations of their liberal bonafides in contrast to others who were saying the SAME THINGS. Meet the minimizer cohort.
Racism allegations only increase, not decrease, as a country diversifies because "racism" becomes any opinion a white person holds that differs from what the growing minority wants. This is every political discussion going forward… pic.twitter.com/cTU8daEq4k
Piers Morgan is an imbecile and an establishment lackey. Here we see him becoming upset that a black man is calling him a “racist.” Well guess what Piers. The establishment narrative that you support includes the premise that all Whites are racists – and you’re White!
At around the 35-second mark, you’ll hear him claim that a Palestinian life has the same value as an Israeli life. Speaking in general terms, this is preposterous.
The claim that “all lives have equal value” is an empty platitude; nobody actually believes it.
Here’s a thought experiment: Ask a leftist if he would kill a White slave owner or the slave if he had to kill one of them. Obviously, he’ll choose to kill the slave owner, and no amount of mental gymnastics could hide the fact that the leftist considers the life of the slave to be more valuable than the life of the slave owner. In fact, some leftists would even go so far as to have ALL “racists” killed if they could; they don’t value the lives of “racists” very much at all.
There are plenty of examples we could throw at conservatives as well – and at people from all political spectra. Nobody truly believes that all lives have equal value.
Generally speaking, Israeli lives have greater value than Gazan lives. Gazans are programed, from an early age, into genocidal hate and bigotry. Israelis generally are not – though some do feel this way. Gazans treat animals very poorly, and they treat women very poorly – and they treat sexual minorities very poorly. Israelis are the opposite, with some exceptions of course.
Whose life is worth more, that of a narrow-minded, hateful, bigot, or that of an educated and tolerant individual? This would be a good place to include an interview I just listened to, and I encourage y’all to spend the 2 hours listening to it as well. It’s very enlightening:
Listen to the above interview, and you’ll grasp the immense chasm that separates Israeli society from Palestinian (specifically Gazan) society.
Again, I emphasize that I’m speaking in generalities here. Obviously, individuals will vary. For example, Mosab Hassan Yousef’s life obviously has tremendous value.
Let’s stop pretending, and acknowledge the fact that killing Gazans, even civilians, is justified if it needs to be done in order to prevent future massacres of Israelis. The death of Gazan children is a sad affair, but it’s not as sad as the death of Israelis.
Note to my fellow White-Nationalists/advocates:
How can you side with the Gazans, against the Israelis, when Israel embodies most of the positive aspects of Western (read WHITE) civilization, while Gaza represents the exact opposite? Don’t let your hatred toward Jews blind you to the difference between a society of educated, advanced, people versus a society of savages.
Greg Johnson, author of The White Nationalist Manifesto and other important works, recently tweeted this response:
By “extended family,” I assume Dr. Johnson means all the other Jews in Britain.
I don’t agree with Dr. Johnson that all the Jews in Britain should be expelled – just the leftist ones, the ones who worked so hard for the destruction of Britain.
Apparently, Lee kern is one of those Jews. He tweeted:
In the first tweet, quoted above, Lee kern writes:
I’ll be fine in Israel It’s the most dynamic, creative and positive place I’ve ever been – even though surrounded by Islamic fundamentalist psychopaths who daily try to destroy it…
From this, we can conclude that Lee kern doesn’t like Islamic fundamentalist psychopaths…
Like this one, for example:
Let me introduce you to the new councillor in Leeds.
— Tommy Robinson ?? (@TRobinsonNewEra) May 4, 2024
How on Earth did such an Islamic fundamentalist get elected in Leeds? It’s because people like Lee kern believed that it’s better to allow “migrants” (AKA invaders) to settle in Britain rather than let them drown.
I disagree. They should not only be ALLOWED to drown, but the royal navy should do its job and actively sink those boats. After a few get sunk, it would no longer be a problem.
For a “progressive,” Lee kern is quite binary; he believes there are only two options for boat migrants:
Let them drown
Allow them into Britain, and then feed them, house them, provide free medical care, and give them preferential treatment over natives.
Actually, there’s a third option: Turn the boats around, and force them to return to France. Let the French deal with them. Yet another option would be to allow them in, and then arrest them all – to be flown back to somewhere in Africa. I don’t like this last option, because it’s too expensive.
He’ll probably never see it, and even if he did, he’d retort with a canned leftist response:
Britain’s problems have NOTHING TO DO with immigration. We NEED immigrants. It’s RACISTS like YOU who create a toxic environment for them. White Britons commit crime too – so it makes no sense for you to bring up migrant crime…
We’ve all heard it a million times. Such claims were nonsense the first time, and they’re nonsense today.
Anyway, congratulations Lee Kern, for being number 7 in this series. Our sages said, kol shevi’een Habibeen – All sevenths are beloved… beloved to somebody, I’m sure. Not to me.
I’ve already posted about my experiences with forced-busing in the ghetto, but there’s one story I haven’t shared yet – until now!
Prepare yourselves for major cringe…
I was in a class of about 35 “students,” almost all of when were inner-city blacks. That’s a polite way of saying, “they were crude, primitive and prone to violence.”
We had a substitute teacher one day. She was a young White woman, apparently fresh out of college, and very idealistic. At some point during class, she did the unthinkable.
She placed an object on her desk, and announced to the class that everybody was to concentrate on the object – and that we were going to make it levitate with the power of our minds.
What she failed to account for was the fact that (aside from yours truly) there weren’t enough IQs in that class to budge a feather, even if the wind was blowing. Needless to say, the object stayed put. The experiment had failed. I was so embarrassed for her. There was some snickering and whispering.
We never saw her again. I hope she’s moved on from her foolishness.
There were already several “White-positive” spaces on Quora – but every single one of them contained negative material toward other races and groups. In the case of “It’s Okay to be White,” it was started with the goal, and guideline, that negativity toward other races would not be tolerated. Unfortunately, that original vision seems to have been lost. I wrote about this in my previous post. This one, which will be under my own personal administration and moderation, will hold true to this vision.
Important topics and conversations are still posted at IOTBW, and I won’t discourage anybody from reading it or contributing. As it stands, I’m still a moderator there.
If you’re so inclined, visit my new space and follow it. We’ll see how it goes.
Only two opinions are allowed regarding blacks: That they don’t commit more crime, or that they DO commit more crime, but their poverty provides a valid excuse for it. In contrast, Whites hold full responsibility for their crimes, real or imagined. No excuses.
Here’s my comment:
I’m confused… Blacks commit more crime due to poverty – but they DON’T commit more crime, and if you think they do, then you can’t serve as judge.
Leftists are divided on whether blacks actually commit more crime. It’s still considered acceptable to say that they do, but it’s due to poverty.
Apparently, it’s not acceptable for judges (who, of all people, should know) to hold that opinion. If we looked hard enough, we’d probably find a retired judge who recognizes the fact that blacks commit more crime because of their GENES. Key word, “retired.” Even then, he might fear for his safety and the safety of his family. In Stalinist America, it’s not safe to speak the truth if you have a known face and address. Being a nobody, such as yours truly, does offer some measure of security.
This decision, and others like it, sets a dangerous precedent: Members of more criminal races (IE. blacks and mestizos) can act with impunity, and White people are legally held to a higher standard – on account of White peoples’ law-abiding nature.
Let’s apply this principle to gender. Men are far more likely to be arrested, charged and convicted for rape than women. This must be due to sexism against men. Therefore, all excess rape convictions of men (above the conviction-rate for women) must be discarded. Equity!
Jews, I will be blunt here, dont know it will get accepted or not.
I could criticize Islam and expect a decent disucssion and rebuttal from a Moslem than, criticizing Israel when i face constant abuses from Jews and threat to my career. Jews can literally screw your career for criticizing their Judeofilth state
Lets be honest here, Jews have for years being the real enemy of Whites, behind the scenes. its their way of extracting revenge from us for Holocaust.
They screwed middle east, pulling America in endless wars, only later to promote immigration of arabs in Europe and US. Its their way of destorying our western white civilization
I thought we’d made it clear that criticism of ANYBODY is allowed, including Jews and Judaism, but that we need to be fair, nuanced and professional about it.
… and then this follow up comment:
“Any Jew apologist comment here will be deleted.”
The submission poster’s name? “ZyclonedSteins-Marx.”
The moderator who accepted it? An open neo-Nazi.
I haven’t been doing much moderating recently, and this is a big reason why; I feel like I’m pissing against the tide. It’s discouraging and demoralizing, and I feel like it’s a losing battle.
Sure, we have a lot of followers now. So does The Daily Stormer, and Stormfront. Nobody’s making money off of the space, so our goal shouldn’t be getting the biggest number of followers, but producing QUALITY content – content that’s WHITE POSITIVE, not bashing other groups, such as blacks or Jews. At this point, very little distinguishes IOTBW from just another neo-Nazi site.
Either do a major purge, and return to the original stated concept, or continue into the abyss. I’m not getting into a moderator war, and I can’t fight this battle alone.
Yes, I know that our enemies will use this post against us. A healthy attitude would be to accept that – and recognize valid criticism as an opportunity for improvement. Not everything our enemies say is automatically wrong. We’re supposed to be better than that – and we should learn from our enemies…
… such as Muslims. Muslims use a multi-pronged approach to world-conquest. They use violence*, peaceful persuasion, “love-jihad,” financial pressure and the arts in their quest. They’re very successful. If every pro-White venue has a neo-Nazi character, then people will equate White-positivity with neo-Nazism. We need to show them that there’s a better way, that there’s room in our movement for those who are NOT neo-Nazis.
Can IOTBW be that venue?
*I’m not condoning violence here, simply pointing out that the multi-pronged Muslim approach is very inclusive.
If you watch this interview until the end, you’ll see that the two men refuse to acknowledge biological race. Tucker Carlson even says, “race is not interesting.”
It SHOULD be interesting, because unless we break the taboo of confronting biological race (particularly racial differences in average IQ), the Establishment Left will continue to cite racial disparities as “evidence” of systemic racism against blacks and mestizos.
It’s ironic that the show is called “uncensored,” and that they supposedly promote the breaking of taboos – yet they continue to be willfully ignorant about the one subject that destroys their enemy’s arguments: The fact that we’re NOT all the same.
Ep. 98 There is systemic racism in the United States, against whites. Everyone knows it. Nobody says it. How come? pic.twitter.com/hSrU9BPVb4
In other news. I submitted a question to a leftist space on Quora:
Leftists tend to attribute personal traits to environment rather than genetics.
Against this backdrop, how much influence does environment have on sexual orientation, particularly homosexuality and transsexualism?
I wasn’t terribly surprised that my submission was rejected. After all, it’s a leading question. The answer is that environment might, indeed, play a large role in influencing people (children) into becoming homosexual or transsexual. In other words, grooming works, and this is why it’s done.
To leftists: If environment plays a significant role in influences sexual orientation, then you’re groomers. If genetics plays a significant role in influencing personality, then this would include IQ, aggressiveness and time-preference. In other words, you’re a “racist.” Of course, both could be true.
Given the above, one would think that most Muslims would be proud to fly the Union Flag, and they certainly wouldn’t have a problem with Native Britons flying it in their presence. After all, Islam and the Union Flag go together like peanut butter and jelly.
Alas, this doesn’t seem to be the case:
Two British lads forced to leave the area by the Met Police for flying the flag of our country.
Here we see the truth: Muslims, or at least many of them, constitute an occupying force in Britain – and the British police are complicit. They are traitors.
One might argue that the display of the Union Flag, under such circumstances, might be considered “provocation,” but the young men hadn’t interacted with anybody. For all the protesters knew, they were there to SUPPORT their cause, and show that Britain stands with them. The fact that the crowd took the opposite view shows their true colors.
Do you think that’s a racist statement? It’s not racist at all. I’ve made other statements, on this blog, that are indeed racist – which doesn’t mean they are any less true. However, the above statement is not racist.
When we allow blacks on juries, specifically for racially charged crimes, what we’re actually doing is allowing blacks to get away with murder:
A black juror from OJ’s trial saying she knew OJ was guilty of MURDER but still let him off pic.twitter.com/n9ZQVUmMgS
This has a little to do with the low average-IQ of blacks, which makes them more susceptible to antiwhite indoctrination, but it has more to do with the CRT dogma that permeates Western society today.
Under certain circumstances, a multi-racial society might work. We don’t have those circumstances. Instead, we have corporate media, education system, government and corporate world that conspire to foment as much antiwhite sentiment as they can.
The result is a contaminated black jury pool. With today’s political climate, all black jurors are suspect – and I’m not saying a black jury CAN’T be impartial. It can happen, and I actually knew a black man who was part of such a jury. That’s what he told us, and having known him well, I believe him. We can’t depend on black juries to be impartial when somebody’s life is at stake, or when a murderer would be set free – as in the O.J. case.
In a just and reasonable society, White defendants should be able to cite the above video in order to exclude black jurors, and so should prosecutors when the defendant is black and the victim White.
