"Immigration reduces crime rates"

Posted on September 25, 2011 by jewamongyou

According to a study cited in Livescience (hat tip to human stupidity), immigration reduces crime rates:

Contrary to popular stereotypes, areas undergoing immigration are associated with lower violence, not spiraling crime, according to a new study.
Harvard University sociologist Robert Sampson examined crime and immigration in Chicago and around the United States to find the truth behind the popular perception that increasing immigration leads to crime.
Sampson’s study results, detailed in the winter issue of the American Sociological Association’s Contexts magazine, summarizes patterns from seven years’ worth of violent acts in Chicago committed by whites, blacks and Hispanics from 180 neighborhoods of varying levels of integration. He also analyzed recent data from police records and the U.S. Census for all communities in Chicago.

This article is typical in that the headline, and initial paragraphs, are designed to lead us to believe that Hispanic immigration is good for the United States.  But further down we find a clue as to what is really happening:

However, Sampson shows that concentrated immigration predicts lower rates of violence across communities in Chicago, with the relationship strongest in poor neighborhoods.

In other words, when Hispanics displace blacks, crime goes down.  This should be no surprise.  The article does not appear to link directly to the study (and it is riddled with advertising links) so I have not read the study itself, but it is possible that Sampson is confusing cause and effect here.  It might be that, if the immigrants are poor, they move to black neighborhoods – where their presence reduces crime.  If they’re well-off, they move to affluent neighborhoods – which tend to already be low-crime.  It would be interesting to see if Sampson can document before/after cases where the introduction of immigrants actually reduced crime in specific (white) areas.  Without racial data, it is hard to derive anything meaningful from this study.
As for the “Hispanic paradox”, it can be explained any number of way, but this “paradox” is only temporary.  Each generation of Hispanics becomes more criminal, and dysfunctional.  So it is hard to see how large-scale Hispanic immigration is good for the United States.
The article goes on:

Immigration is therefore not just a Hispanic issue; although little noticed, increasing foreign-born diversity among blacks (e.g., from the West Indies and Africa) is associated with lower crime even within segregated black communities.

Perhaps, if he replaced the word “even” with “especially”, the statement would be more accurate.  Any sort of immigration into the ghetto is going to decrease crime (at least short term) simply because ghetto blacks are the most crime-prone segment of the population.
One paragraph, toward the end of the article, is particularly puzzling:

Sampson’s arguments are supported at the national level as well. Significant immigration growth — including by illegal aliens — occurred in the mid-1990s, peaking at the end of the decade. During this time, the national homicide rate plunged. Crime dropped even in immigration hot spots, such as Los Angeles (where it dropped 45 percent overall), San Jose, Dallas and Phoenix.

Is he trying to say that it was immigration that brought about the decrease in homicide rates?  I wonder if there is any evidence for this claim.  It seems to me that this is a roundabout way of saying “The United States should be more like Mexico – because Mexico is a low-crime utopia”.  We are also left wondering if Sampson, himself, lives among Hispanic immigrants.  Given his high opinion of them, surely he has chosen to live in the barrio.  On second thought, I doubt it.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics | 7 Comments

Diversity costs You-B.S. dearly

Posted on September 21, 2011 by jewamongyou

(Hat tip to Irish Savant) Struggling Swiss banking giant UBS is big on diversity.  Here is their diversity statement (my bold):

In today’s global business environment, we believe that it is essential for us to have a workforce of individuals from widely different backgrounds, cultures and life experiences.
Diversity matters in our business. Diversity in gender, ethnicity, age and other factors supports first-hand understanding of regional markets and sensitivity to local customs. We believe that we also gain a competitive advantage from more subtle differences in background, experience and thought. These elements give our employees a unique perspective to anticipate the needs of our increasingly diverse client base and generate the most appropriate, innovative, solutions for them. We work to strengthen the diversity and inclusiveness of our workforce because, in the end, our long-term success depends on equal employment opportunity and having the best people in the right roles.
Our workforce is truly global – our employees are citizens of 147 countries. In 2010, the average age of our employees was 38 years, with the average length of employment at UBS at 8.6 years.
The scope of our diversity strategy and initiatives is both global and regional. Our global, top-down diversity strategy includes divisional diversity goals, and we are actively partnering with firm’s senior management to achieve them. Our regional diversity teams translate our global commitment into action by working with local business and HR leaders on business-aligned plans that are linked to regional talent strategies. We also have more than 20 employee networks. These networks help our employees build cross-business relationships and strengthen our inclusive culture. We have global network guidelines that enable our employees to set up or join employee networks or affinity groups in any of our operating regions.

The parts in bold is corporate jargon for “we force our managers to hire people based on race, gender, nationality and age.  The way it usually works is that failure to hire “people of color”, females etc. results in poor reviews, withholding of raises and a lack of opportunities for advancement in the company.
Against this backdrop, we can understand how a person like Kweku Adoboli most likely got his job.  Here he is being led away after having lost $2 billion dollars through unauthorized trading:

He doesn’t seem very upset about it; after all, it wasn’t his money that he lost and he’ll just get a slap on the wrist.  Here’s the video.  Will UBS ever question the (probable) role of diversity goals in this expensive fiasco?  Don’t count on it.
Of course, there have been other rogue traders in the past who have lost millions or billions, and they were white.  But as long as a company has policies in place that force the employment of inferior people*, then the rest of us will suspect that those policies were to blame whenever a beneficiary of those policies turns out to be the culprit.
An analogy would be a smoker who is diagnosed with lung cancer.  His doctor will blame the smoking – but the cancer might have had nothing to do with smoking; it could have been bad genes or bad luck.  If smoking is likely bad for your health, it would be smart to quit – even if a non smoking-related illness is bound to strike you down sooner or later.  We reduce the risk-factors.  Diversity goals are a risk factor.
*People who were hired in order to fill a quota, and were not necessarily the best for the job.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 12 Comments

My first mivtzoyim* "incident"

Posted on September 20, 2011 by jewamongyou

Yesterday was a glorious, beautiful and sunny day; a rarity in these parts.  So I thought to myself, “This is a perfect day for mivtzoyim*!”  I rummaged through my files, and the various blogs, for a good flyer candidate, settling on this one (that I got from Unamusement Park):

While distributing them door to door, I couldn’t help but notice an overweight, middle-aged white man hollering at me, from a few houses back, “HEY!  Why are you leaving this **** on my ******* door?!”  I replied that I hadn’t seen any “No Soliciting” signs on his property and continued on my merry way.
Later on, after I’d finished the loop and was heading back, that guy was waiting for me, with his non-white friend, by the curb.  I casually walked up to them and greeted them with a smile.  “Why are you leaving this **** on people’s doors?” he said.  I replied that I’m doing my part to encourage a positive white consciousness in the community, that it’s a message of love.  “But you’re not white” he said.  I could have asked him how he can be sure; there are “light-skinned blacks”, so why can there not be “dark-skinned whites”?  But instead I told him it doesn’t matter one way or the other.  He pointed at his non-white friend as if I had somehow harmed him with my flyers, and told me they are “offensive”.   After a quick “debate” on the merits of white identity, he told me that the cops are coming after me.  I shrugged and told him, “That’s alright; I’ve done nothing illegal”.  He disputed that – but the cops never did show up.  I continued to distribute my flyers, and enjoy the beautiful day, until they were all gone. 
Encounters such as this are encouraging.  They mean people actually read the flyers.  They give us the opportunity to actually state our case – albeit in a concise manner.  They also help educate the public as to our rights to freedom of speech; apparently, many people believe that it is illegal to distribute flyers that some may find “offensive”.  Assuming the fat man is a hardcore, incorrigible leftist, then I get the satisfaction of having riled him up.  I give myself extra credit for that.
*Mivtzoyim = street activism, such as talking to strangers, distributing flyers or putting up signs.

Posted in activism | 29 Comments

Reason Radio interviews Jewamongyou

Posted on September 19, 2011 by jewamongyou

Though I hate listening to my own voice, I have no problems inflicting it upon others.  So, here it is:
http://reasonradionetwork.com/20110916/the-stark-truth-interview-with-reuben-hayat

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links | 41 Comments

Eugenicist exposes "harmless" cartoon as vicious propaganda

Posted on September 18, 2011 by jewamongyou


Here is what eugenicist has to say about the above cartoon:

I’m staggered by the intellectual dishonesty behind this comic. Let me illustrate:
1. “There’s a certain ‘scientific’ theory that…[whites] are inherently, genetically smarter than blacks!” This idiot thinks that putting quotation marks around the word scientific, and making the theory sound distasteful, disproves it. For an analogy: “There’s a certain ‘scientific’ theory that…light and heavy objects fall at the same rate!” Same level of intellectual content.
2. Mr. Labcoat is correct, but a bit dishonest, in stating that black Americans score 15 points lower than white Americans, on average. (A better, more accurate term would be “one standard deviation,” since IQ tests use different scores and systems.) This gap is not a product of biased testing; it is remarkably consistent, no matter what test(s) you use. So, a few points for that.
3. Could the IQ gap be because blacks are “inherently, genetically” not as smart as whites? Quite possibly. This theory has not been disproven; it’s simply too horrible for most intellectuals to consider, so they act as if there’s conclusive evidence against it, when all they have is their own disgust. That’s anti-science.
4. It’s possible that the liberal thesis is correct, i.e. that the gap is entirely due to environmental factors. The problem is, we can’t know the reason for the gap when certain theories are viewed as heretical. It’s like saying “Well, we can study the planets and the universe, so long as we conclude that the earth is the center of the solar system, because to suggest otherwise goes against God.” That’s anti-science.
5. The whole slave narrative “experiment” assumes that, before slavery, Africans had intellects at or above the level of whites, but ill treatment degraded their potential. In reality, black Americans routinely score 10 to 25 points higher on IQ tests than black Africans, including Africans in countries where there is no history of colonialism, apartheid, slave trading or any real white presence. In some sub-Saharan African countries, the median IQ is somewhere in the 60s.
Maybe all the smart blacks were shipped over here. Maybe some special conditions degraded black IQs more steeply in Africa than America. Maybe the fact that black Americans are, on average, 1/5th white has something to do with it. Maybe not. But as long as this cowering fear of “racism” persists, we won’t know why.
6. “IQ tests designed by privileged black Africans.” Oh, don’t make me laugh! The reason that IQ tests are used isn’t because they were designed by “privileged” Americans, it’s because they correlate with success in western societies. If Africans designed an “IQ test” that correlated with success in African societies, blacks would probably do better than whites. And you could claim that those skills are the real intelligence. By this rubric, a Robert Oppenheimer, or a Hubert Henry Harrison for that matter, is “privileged” over a Bushman because, while the latter can survive and thrive in the Kalahari, the former can “only” understand advanced physics or give extemporaneous lectures on a wide variety of subjects. Such a viewpoint baffles me, frankly.
7. “If…you’ve proven the hypothesis!” You don’t have to go through this sadistic rigmarole to do it. We can now sequence DNA; it would be easy (but expensive) to take a large cross-section of the populace, sequence their DNA, study their lives from age 5 to 30 and document everything, like the NLSY did. Would black Americans in homogeneously black, upper-income neighborhoods score higher on IQ tests than dirt-poor whites? Does divorce affect IQ? And how predictive are gene sequences for lifetime success when divorced from environmental factors? It would be fascinating stuff, but any time someone would draw an unorthodox conclusion, it would go from being scientific to being “scientific,” however well-documented or thorough.
8. If white Americans have abetted black American dysgenics for hundreds of years, it doesn’t disprove the genetic hypothesis. It might even prove it, since black slaves were presumably bred for certain traits for generations. (Chris Rock discussed this in a comedy special.)
9. It’s possible that the IQ gap exists, solely or mostly, because of centuries of ill-treatment of blacks by whites. That is useful knowledge, the same way it’s useful to know that childhood abuse hampered you in adult life. But there’s no way to reverse trauma that’s already happened, and the traumatizer can’t deal with your issues for you.
10. I must also take issue with the tone of this comic. It is sadistic and sarcastic and dishonest. It wants to give whites a “taste of their own medicine” for daring to contradict liberal orthodoxy. It misunderstands science and relies on arrant misrepresentation. It aims to intimidate people rather than inform them. It may be pro-intellectual, but it is (no pun intended) anti-intelligence.
“But it’s just a comic,” I hear you say. (Well, I don’t actually hear you, or hearyou, because I’m anticipating an imaginary reader’s response in my head.) “What do you expect, a proof in symbolic logic?” No, but I expect some basic honesty and common sense. Tom the Dancing Bug is a fairly popular comic published in newspapers, alternative weeklies and boingboing.net.
If you find the idea of inherent group differences disgusting, there are many ways to express that without bullying the opposition or suggesting they be enslaved. You could also conduct, support or publicize scientific studies that address these issues, instead of entertaining revenge fantasies and calling your opponents names. In other words, you could act like an adult.
(Source: christineam)

I couldn’t have said it better myself, eugenicist!

Posted in examples of propaganda | 11 Comments

The Oregonian: Oregon SAT's lose some ground

Posted on September 17, 2011 by jewamongyou

Under the (front page) headline, “Oregon SAT’s lost some ground”, the Oregonian (Sept. 15, 2011) tells us:

Oregon’s high school seniors are testing increasingly lower on the annual SAT’s, based on results released Wednesday by the College Board.
Average test scores for Oregon’s high school class of 2011 were the lowest in a decade, though they were good enough to keep Oregon scores above the national average, ranking 22nd…
In Oregon 15,763 public high school students, or 89 percent of the state’s total number of possible test takers, completed the exam.  This year, they scored lower in each category compared with 2010 averages…
Andrea Morgan, an educational specialist at the Oregon Department of Education, said the SAT shouldn’t be overinterpreted.  The test is not a barometer of college readiness or how well the state educates high school students overall, she said.  Many colleges and universities use SAT scores and high school gradepoint averages to gauge a student’s possible performance level.  But it’s not everything…
Morgan blames the decrease this year to the larger number of students taking the exam.  This year, 18,754 students took the SAT, about 56 percent of the state’s high school graduates according to the department.  In 2010, 18,461 students took the exam, or about 54 percent of the high school graduates.
Morgan and others at the education department went out of their way to point out a potential gold lining:  an uptick in the percentage of minority and underperforming students who took the test – 25 percent compared with 23 percent in 2010.
“If the state is increasing the number of minority and underperforming students taking the SAT, then that is a positive,” said Sue Levin, executive director of the Oregon chapter of Stand for Children, the educational advocacy nonprofit…”
Indeed, in 2011, more Latino, African American and Asian students took the SAT test.  The increase in the number of Asian students, in particular, was most notable:  a 168-person jump.  Asian students also performed comparably to white students in the three categories as a whole…
“We’re going to have higher expectations now,” Morgan said.  “We’ll see an increase in these scores as more students are expected to meet that higher standard.”

The above article is so full of misleading statements, and hogwash, that it would be no surprise if The Oregonian chose to leave it out of their webpage (the above is from the printed edition) for fear of the ridicule it would attract.
Yes, it’s true that SAT scores are not “everything”.  One factor that is much more important, in deciding who gets into prestigious schools and who does not, is race.  The Center for Equal Opportunity, for example, recently found that:

The odds ratio favoring African Americans and Hispanics over whites was 576-to-1 and 504-to-1, respectively, using the SAT and class rank while controlling for other factors. Thus, the median composite SAT score for black admittees was 150 points lower than for whites and Asians, and the Latino median SAT score was 100 points lower. Using the ACT, the odds ratios climbed to 1330-to-1 and 1494-to-1, respectively, for African Americans and Hispanics over whites.

So yes, it is true that SAT scores are not “everything”.  What about the explanation given for why this year’s scores are lower than last years –  More students took the test?  Left unexplained is how, exactly, a larger sample size necessarily results in lower scores.  By this reasoning, countries with the most people should also be the dumbest.  China should be an intellectual dwarf compared to Haiti.
Later in the article, it is revealed that there is a “gold lining” (a “silver lining” is not good enough):  more minority, and underperforming, students took the test.  Now I know I’m going out on a limb here, but is it possible that this might have something to do with the lower average test scores?  Yes, it’s true that a lot of Asians took the test this year – but this wouldn’t have an appreciable effect on the average score since “Asian students also performed comparably to white students”.  What would have an appreciable impact is, of course, the black and Hispanic test-takers.
But not to worry!  As expectations get higher, we’ll see an increase in scores in the near future.  But of course.  There is little doubt that test scores will improve – by any means necessary.
Download your copy of “The Ashkenazi Revolution” via the link on the right hand side of this blog’s homepage – right above the “donate” button.

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 7 Comments

One more post about The Ashkenazi Revolution

Posted on September 16, 2011 by jewamongyou

My initial intention was not to actually make money off the translation; only to offset the expenses I incurred in the process.  The point of this blog is not to be a business for me, or any other type of money-making scheme.   My real goal, in translating The Ashkenazi Revolution, was to make available, to the wider public, what seemed to be an interesting book.  In hindsight, I also wish to give a more powerful voice to a man I now admire – though I don’t always agree with him.  It is my honor to be the vehicle for his voice.
Therefore, I intend to make the translation available for download to all who want it.  As for those who have already sent me money, I hope this step will not cause y’all to regret having sent me that money.  The donations I have received thus far have paid for the expense in purchasing the book and a little bit more – so your contributions are greatly appreciated.  I always knew that, at some point, I would make the translation available for free – but it was not my intention to do so this quickly.  So please don’t feel as if I tricked a few of you into paying for something that was going to be free soon anyway.  That was not my intention at all; if anybody has hard feelings about it, let me know and I’ll refund the money.
Of course, I would hope that those who download it, and appreciate it, will still (voluntarily) make a donation.  After all, several months of my life went into this project.
Hopefully, I’ll be able to figure out how to put up a download link within the next few days – when I’ve got some time.  I also hope that the increased availability of this work will generate discussion about the ideas contained therein.
Here’s the PDF:
The Ashkenazi Revolution

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, Jewish stuff and Israel | 16 Comments

The Ashkenazi Revolution is done!

Posted on September 14, 2011 by jewamongyou

Well… not that there actually was an Ashkenazi Revolution; what I mean to say is that I’ve finally finished translating the book – and putting together the glossary, preface and a brief biography of the author.  It’s all available now!  Folks, it was a lot of hard work.  As stated, I am asking a donation of $20 (use the paypal donation option on the right of the home page).  If you are poor, then send what you can; things are not easy for me now financially.  Those who have already sent their donations, have received their copies.  Hopefully, we’ll be getting some feedback/reviews from those people in the future.  The book itself is about 300 pages.
The book is really good reading.  We should bear in mind, however, that the author, Kalman Katzenelson, was very much immersed in his own world:  The world of 1960’s Israel.  The book is primarily a history book.  It deals with the nature of the Jewish People, ancient and modern.  Katzenelson speaks of many people, and institutions, that are not familiar to most readers.  This is why I included a glossary – though it is possible to understand the main points without most of the background information contained in the glossary.  There is also a short biography of the author – though I never did find out when he died.
The Ashkenazi Revolution is not a race-realist book.  Katzenelson does not go into the science of racial disparities in I.Q. or crime.  He does, however, make much of “the gap” between Mizrahi (Mideastern) Jews and Ashkenazi Jews.  If you read between the lines, you get the impression that the author suspects there are racial differences, but he dare not speak of them.  His restraint did not help him much; he still became a pariah, and his book was still banned in Israel.  Were he able, and willing, to consider the differences in average I.Q., between the various populations, his work would have been much more fleshed out.  Either way, the book is a classic.
If you are not familiar with Jewish history, or Zionist history in particular, you will be after you read this book.  If you are already familiar with the basics of Jewish/Zionist history, then this book will give you lots of food for thought and plenty of new perspectives to ponder.  Personally, I found it very enlightening, even though I do not agree with everything the author has to say.  Translating The Ashkenazi Revolution was among the most challenging, and rewarding, experiences of my life.
The Ashkenazi Revolution is not just for racialists.  It deserves a much wider audience.  Students of Jewish history, politics, linguistics and literature can all benefit from reading it.  But Katzenelson says of himself that he is not a Zionist; he calls himself an Ashkenazi nationalist.  He was a nationalist of a nation that never even considered itself a “nation”.  There are a great many parallels between the struggles of Ashkenaz, as described in this book, and the struggles of whites today.  Katzenelson loved his own people, the Ashkenazi People, very much.  He felt great anger at the injustices it had suffered – not so much from gentiles, but mainly from other Jewish peoples.
Much of what is said, in The Ashkenazi Revolution, sounds very similar to what is said in forums such as Stormfront or VNN.  Katzenelson openly admits that Jews have tried to take over the world (in their own way), that persecutions such as the Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocuast were backlashes against Jewish power-grabs, that Jews tried to subvert the nations in which they lived.  But he does not claim there was any conscious conspiracy to do so.  More importantly, he wants to rectify the situation.  He writes that the anti-Semites are right in viewing Jews not as a downtrodden people, but as a conquering people.  Katzenelson was a Jewish supremacist, but more specifically, an Ashkenazi supremacist.  Personally, I don’t see things the same way he does – but I still have a lot of respect for his courage, his honesty, and his sacrifice for his beliefs.  Many of those who condemn him are not half the man he was.
I plan on releasing the original Hebrew version, in PDF format, as well.  I simply have not yet found a cost-effective way to convert the image files into Hebrew PDF.  Off-the-shelf programs cost around $150.  As soon as I’ve overcome this hurdle (perhaps with the help of a reader), I’ll furnish the Hebrew version to anybody who is interested.  Though I have edited, and proofread, my translation until I was blue in the face, I have no illusions that I have discovered all the errors.  Readers will bring them to my attention, over the course of time, and there will be future editions of the work.

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, Jewish stuff and Israel | 39 Comments

The "Circle of Racism"

Posted on September 12, 2011 by jewamongyou

Somebody recently asked me to elaborate on the definition of “racism”.  Here is a graphic representation of how racial-egalitarian leftists define it (bearing in mind that this definition only applies to whites).
It’s alright, according to them, to express a preference for one’s self, and It’s alright to prefer one’s own parents, siblings or children. It’s also alright to prefer one’s own species.  But between the realms of family and species lies the ominous “Circle of Racism”:
I haven’t been posting much lately.  This is because I’ve been spending a lot of time on an “editing marathon” as the completion of  “The Ashkenazi Revolution” translation is now in sight.

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 13 Comments

Please, no more "African-American" government officials

Posted on September 9, 2011 by jewamongyou

As long as black history is celebrated, racial “goals” are set, racial “social justice” is sought and blacks are considered de-facto victims – we have the right to demand that said “African-Americans” not be allowed to hold important government positions.  When just about all critics of Barack Obama were accused of racism, during the presidential campaign and early in his term, it should have become obvious to all but the most dimwitted that it is not a good idea to have a black president in a nation where blacks are held to different standards than whites.

If issues are important in an election, then race clouds the issues.  If conduct is important in judging an official, then race clouds judgment.  Since nobody need fear being called a “racist” for criticizing a white politician, black politicians have an automatic advantage.

Back in 2008, Portland’s black parking manager, Ellis McCoy, was investigated for corruption.  His first response was that the accusations were directed against him due to his race.  The Portland Tribune told us, back then, that McCoy retaliated by threatening a lawsuit that accused his accusers of racism (see also here):

Amounting to a threat of lawsuit, the tort claim comes at a time when McCoy himself is under investigation. A city personnel probe was sparked earlier this year when a city parking subcontractor, Bruce Feathers, accused McCoy, among other things, of accepting meals and a ticket to a Portland Trail Blazers game – both of which Portland officials say are discouraged under the city’s ethics rules…
Sndyer’s four-page letter claims that in 2001, another manager in the city’s Office of Transportation, where McCoy works, acknowledged that McCoy’s skin color was a barrier to the other manager’s cooperation with McCoy in the workplace. The letter also alleges that, starting in 2004, McCoy repeatedly heard secondhand that city parking meter technicians had been telling people he’d taken bribes or gifts from SmartMeter contractors.

More recently, The Oregonian tells us that McCoy not only got away with gross ethics violations, but he was regularly rewarded:

No matter the accusation, Ellis K. McCoy had an answer. Until now.
Portland’s former parking manager —under investigation by the FBI and Internal Revenue Service on allegations that he took bribes and kickbacks — isn’t talking.

And by and large, neither are the city officials who supervised him for years, raised serious questions about his leadership and judgment, yet kept him in a high-ranking position.

But interviews and documents released this week show McCoy — who denies guilt and has not been charged with any crime — stayed in his Transportation Bureau job through, on his part, a combination of business savvy, ready answers and threats to sue for racial discrimination. For the city, documents show at least one poorly conducted investigation and a general lack of follow-through on stern warnings demanding performance improvements.

It’s unusual for The Oregonian to admit that blacks benefit from America’s racial spoils system.  It takes an especially egregious offense to distract it from its usual anti-white routine.  How would events have transpired if Portland’s parking manager had been white?  Is it safe to assume that corrective action would have been taken much sooner?  One wonders how much money Portland taxpayers – and drivers – could have saved simply by making sure all important government positions are held by whites – whites who can be safely criticized, disciplined or fired before things get out of hand.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites | 15 Comments