The "Circle of Racism"

Somebody recently asked me to elaborate on the definition of “racism”.  Here is a graphic representation of how racial-egalitarian leftists define it (bearing in mind that this definition only applies to whites).
It’s alright, according to them, to express a preference for one’s self, and It’s alright to prefer one’s own parents, siblings or children. It’s also alright to prefer one’s own species.  But between the realms of family and species lies the ominous “Circle of Racism”:
I haven’t been posting much lately.  This is because I’ve been spending a lot of time on an “editing marathon” as the completion of  “The Ashkenazi Revolution” translation is now in sight.

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 13 Comments

Please, no more "African-American" government officials

As long as black history is celebrated, racial “goals” are set, racial “social justice” is sought and blacks are considered de-facto victims – we have the right to demand that said “African-Americans” not be allowed to hold important government positions.  When just about all critics of Barack Obama were accused of racism, during the presidential campaign and early in his term, it should have become obvious to all but the most dimwitted that it is not a good idea to have a black president in a nation where blacks are held to different standards than whites.

If issues are important in an election, then race clouds the issues.  If conduct is important in judging an official, then race clouds judgment.  Since nobody need fear being called a “racist” for criticizing a white politician, black politicians have an automatic advantage.

Back in 2008, Portland’s black parking manager, Ellis McCoy, was investigated for corruption.  His first response was that the accusations were directed against him due to his race.  The Portland Tribune told us, back then, that McCoy retaliated by threatening a lawsuit that accused his accusers of racism (see also here):

Amounting to a threat of lawsuit, the tort claim comes at a time when McCoy himself is under investigation. A city personnel probe was sparked earlier this year when a city parking subcontractor, Bruce Feathers, accused McCoy, among other things, of accepting meals and a ticket to a Portland Trail Blazers game – both of which Portland officials say are discouraged under the city’s ethics rules…
Sndyer’s four-page letter claims that in 2001, another manager in the city’s Office of Transportation, where McCoy works, acknowledged that McCoy’s skin color was a barrier to the other manager’s cooperation with McCoy in the workplace. The letter also alleges that, starting in 2004, McCoy repeatedly heard secondhand that city parking meter technicians had been telling people he’d taken bribes or gifts from SmartMeter contractors.

More recently, The Oregonian tells us that McCoy not only got away with gross ethics violations, but he was regularly rewarded:

No matter the accusation, Ellis K. McCoy had an answer. Until now.
Portland’s former parking manager —under investigation by the FBI and Internal Revenue Service on allegations that he took bribes and kickbacks — isn’t talking.

And by and large, neither are the city officials who supervised him for years, raised serious questions about his leadership and judgment, yet kept him in a high-ranking position.

But interviews and documents released this week show McCoy — who denies guilt and has not been charged with any crime — stayed in his Transportation Bureau job through, on his part, a combination of business savvy, ready answers and threats to sue for racial discrimination. For the city, documents show at least one poorly conducted investigation and a general lack of follow-through on stern warnings demanding performance improvements.

It’s unusual for The Oregonian to admit that blacks benefit from America’s racial spoils system.  It takes an especially egregious offense to distract it from its usual anti-white routine.  How would events have transpired if Portland’s parking manager had been white?  Is it safe to assume that corrective action would have been taken much sooner?  One wonders how much money Portland taxpayers – and drivers – could have saved simply by making sure all important government positions are held by whites – whites who can be safely criticized, disciplined or fired before things get out of hand.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites | 15 Comments

Retards at work in Israel

I came across this video, and it makes me wonder if the featured Israelis have I.Q.’s beyond single digits.   If they care so much for black Africans, nobody is stopping them from going to Africa and helping them there.  Either they are total morons, who believe that the Jewish State can remain Jewish even if it welcomes hordes of non-Jews into its borders, or they are especially evil people who wish to bring death to their own nation:
 
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra_V4Yk-0R8&w=420&h=345]
 
By the way, the lyrics of the song they are singing have to do with bringing peace upon them and the whole world – because everybody knows how large numbers of black Africans always bring peace.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 18 Comments

Why can't white celebrities have as much conviction as Katt Williams?

According to The Daily News:

Comedian Katt Williams isn’t really sorry for an anti-Mexican rant he made during a performance, he said on CNN on Saturday morning.
In fact, despite an apology attributed to him released by his publicist earlier this week, Williams said he “meant what I said and said what I meant.”
The controversial comments were caught in a video posted online. Williams, who was performing at the Celebrity Theater in Phoenix, asked a man in the crowd if he was a Mexican.
“It appears to me y’all like it over here a lot,” he said.
“Do you remember when white people used to say ‘Go back to Africa,’ and we’d have to tell them we don’t want to? So if you love Mexico, (expletive), get the (expletive) over there!”
It then got ugly – and Williams finished the argument with “We were slaves (expletive). You just work like that as landscapers.”
Williams said on CNN that he was just defending his country to one man – but couldn’t be racist because he had so many Mexican fans.
“If I had disrespected Mexicans, I wouldn’t have been able to get out of there alive,” the hot-mouthed comic said.
The non-apology was a quick turnaround from a statement his publicist released earlier in the week profusely apologizing for the bad joke.

I say, go ahead and disrespect Mexicans; disrespect anybody you want.  Just tell the truth.  If Mexicans find the truth to be disrespectful, then that would be their problem, not the speaker’s.  Now that whites have lost almost all self-respect and pride in their own heritage, perhaps there is a chance that they can relearn it from blacks and Mexicans.  If whites can reinfect themselves with tuberculosis, leprosy and God knows what else from the third world, then why can’t they also reinfect themselves with a healthy dose of racial pride and solidarity?

Posted in freedom of speech issues, immigration/ Hispanics | 8 Comments

A person? A painting?

I found this at  Strike the Root, and wanted to share it with the rest of y’all.  Truly amazing!
 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

New York Daily News: Black men more likely to cheat

Amren recently linked to an article, in the New York Daily News, that bemoaned the plight of black women.  Lost in the discussion about black women was an important statement about black men:

And if all this weren’t enough to leave black women on the wrong side of happy, unmarried black women have to contend with black men who, according to social science data, are more likely than any other group of men to maintain relationships with multiple women.

The mainstream media has a tendency to couch valid criticism of non-whites in terms that make it sound like the perpetrators are actually victims.  Thus we find statements such as black women “suffer from being overweight” or “rising tide of violence impacting historically African American neighborhoods “.  Here too, it is only permissible for them to make a negative statement about black men because it is framed in such a way that blacks (female blacks) are victims.
Now that the Daily News has admitted that black men are less faithful, will some of those foolish mudsharks take heed?

Posted in examples of propaganda, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 53 Comments

Flyer distribution is catching on

An anonymous reader has contacted me and told me that, inspired by unamused and myself, he has been distributing his own flyer, which he calls  HATE CRIME ALERT DENVER.   I know of others who have also been distributing flyers and to all of them I say, “keep up the good work!”
I recently went door to door and distributed a newer version of my “Stop the Hate” flyer.  On the reverse was a summary of an earlier post of mine dealing with the so-called racial discrimination in the Portland area.
I am considering distributing the following article, linked to at Amren:

The Racial Violence that Dare Not Speak Its Name

ByJohn T. Bennett
Recent flash mob violence has alerted Americans to a troubling wave of sadistic racial mayhem. A notable outbreak occurred in Denver in 2009, setting a pattern of delay, denial, and silence. Now that same scourge has returned to Denver, among many other places.
In 2009, a four month wave of mayhem broke out in Denver. There were at least 26 violent robberies committed by two black gangs.  The victims were — without exception — whites and Hispanics.  When the dust settled from that initial spate of violence, victims were left with injuriesranging from a skull fracture to broken noses and shattered eye sockets.  The local Denver ABC news affiliate summarized the crime spree:

Black gangs roaming downtown Denver often vented their hatred for white victims before assaulting and robbing them during a four-month crime wave, according to interviews and court records obtained by 7NEWS.

That is not the language of a conservative commentator; it’s simply a mainstream local news report from an American city that has witnessed widespread racial violence.
The first-hand accounts and surveillance videos of the 2009 attacks are shocking. These weren’t sucker punches or fair fights — the attackers swing madly and rapidly with a viciousness that can only come from blind cruelty.  The victims, who can be seen in interviews, were kind-looking, ordinary people.  The victims were mostly either gay or straight couples. They didn’t provoke the attacks in any conceivable way.  The attackers sometimes fractured skulls, or broke eye sockets, and left one victim in a coma.  There were a total of 26 attacks from July 17 to Nov. 17.
An incredible 38 people were arrested in connection with this campaign of racist violence. Thirty were ultimately charged, all black.  Has this number of arrests been made against any violent white supremacist or right wing organization in the last 50 years?
The story first came to light in 2009 when a source inside the Denver police department said that the department was “keeping the public in the dark” about the attacks.  Court documents show that the police did indeed have knowledge of a pattern of racial attacks, but remained silent for 27 days.  One victim complained that, had the police informed the public sooner, he could have protected himself.  The same group responsible for that violence is suspected in the murder of Andrew Graham, a young graduate student who was senselessly shot in 2010.
Late last month, Denver saw a possible return to violence, as couples leaving restaurants were being attacked by a group of black men with baseball bats. The Denver Police have renewed warnings of those attacks.
The brutality  in Denver is disturbingly similar to violence occurring elsewhere, nationwide.  In the last few months alone, a young white lady named Shaina Perry was taunted and beaten in Milwaukee.  A young white man named Carter Strange had his skull fractured by a mob in South Carolina.  Dawid Strucinski was beaten into a coma by a mob in Bayonne.  Anna Taylor, Emily Guendelsberger, andThomas Fitzgerald were beaten and kicked to the ground in separate Philadelphia flash mobs.  Every weekend in July, mobs have attacked in Greensboro, NC.  In a mostly-white suburb of Cleveland, witnesses reported large groups of “teens” walking through the streets, “shouting profanities and racial epithets,” and one man was viciously beaten while leaving a restaurant with his wife and friends.  In all of those cases, the victims were white and the attackers were black.
Then there are the ominous stories that no one has ever heard about. For instance, a mob of 150 “young people” descended on a small, predominantly white NJ town named Winfield Townshipduring a firefighters’ carnival. Perhaps the townspeople are merely lucky that there wasn’t violence. Isn’t the racial mob mentality scary enough that we shouldn’t have to wait for violence before we take it seriously?
It cannot be emphasized enough that these attacks often occur in suburban areas where the black groups have to leave their own neighborhoods and purposefully travel to areas that are predominantly non-black, to attack non-black victims. For instance, in one of the many flash mob attacks in Chicago, Trovulus Pickett, 17, was part of a group that attacked and robbed several victims, including a 68-year-old doctor.  The attacks occurred in the North Side, which is 15 miles away fromPickett’s home. This indicates a serious level of planning and potential racial targeting. If these were just run-of-the mill robberies, it wouldn’t be too surprising. But the social problem we’re looking at is large groups, sometimes numbering in the hundreds, sometimes armed, engaging in racially-focused violent crimes.
There is quite simply no way for a politically correct society to grasp these events, much less effectively deal with them.  Liberals have reached the depths of self-deception and self-censorship in response.  The Washington Post, New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune, have all openly stated that they will refuse  to report on the racial facts of these violent crimes. The Los Angeles Times explains that they don’t want to “unfairly stigmatize racial groups.” They prefer the soft bigotry of low expectations instead.
These flash mobs have turned the comfortable narrative of racism on its head. Politicians, the media, academics, and the legal community do not have the capacity to face the issue. The reigning dogma of white racism is too deeply entrenched. There is a small grievance industry built around condemning white racism and intolerance, real or imagined.  Indeed, the welfare state itself is in large part based on the assumption that whites need to give more to achieve racial equality, as reflected in President Obama’s lament that the civil rights movement didn’t focus on economic redistribution.

I left out the last paragraph so as to avoid running afoul of copyright laws – but the printed version has the entire article (front and back, font size 11.5).  Input is appreciated.


							
Posted in activism | 3 Comments

Leftists: "We must maintain high standards for our propaganda!"

Sometimes even leftists have a problem with the propaganda of other leftists, though they are rarely able to see it for what it is.  A while back, I posted about a study, funded by the City of Portland, that concluded there is a lot of anti-black and anti-Hispanic discrimination in the Portland housing market.  The Oregonian took the study and ran with it, assuming that it was justified and accurate.  The problems I listed, in my post, apply whether the study was properly done or not.
Now we read, in the Willamette Weekly, a Portland area leftist rag, that the study was actually flawed:

An Unreliable Housing Audit

A city-funded housing audit misrepresented evidence, making discrimination in Portland look worse than it really is.

…The audit set off howls of protest and frowning editorials about the city’s shameful treatment of minorities looking for a place to live.
But interviews and newly released records from the state Bureau of Labor and Industries show the audit is marred by errors and sloppy work, and that the Fair Housing Council withheld evidence that would have weakened claims that it had found discrimination. Although city officials believed Fair Housing Council testers did all their surveys in person, for example, at least some of their evidence of supposed discrimination against Latino testers was gathered over the phone.
As a result, the audit exaggerates the degree of housing discrimination it found. That raises questions about the reliability of the Fair Housing Council, a watchdog group that contracts with cities across Oregon to do audits.
City officials have refused to renew their contract with the Fair Housing Council and suspended negotiations for a new one Aug. 9 after discovering the audit was rife with problems.
“We have concluded the audit is not reliable,” City Commissioner Nick Fish, who oversees the Housing Bureau, tells WW. “There have been failures of communication and breakdowns of protocol. The test they gave us has been demonstrated to be something we cannot rely on.”

Will The Oregonian retract its earlier editorial?  Don’t hold your breath.  Furthermore, we should not be so certain that the “Fair Housing Council” did “sloppy work”.   It is more likely that it did good work, there is simply a misunderstanding of their goal.  Their goal is not to find out if there is discrimination against blacks and Hispanics; it is to find such discrimination at any cost.   A couple of the comments, on the Willamette Weekly’s site, even state as much.
None of the leftist powers-that-be are questioning that there is a lot of discrimination against blacks and Hispanics.  This is a matter of faith for them.  They only question the methodology in this particular study.  This is evident from the last part of the above article:

Fish says problems with the audit shouldn’t take away from the city’s plan to end discrimination in housing, which he says is supported by other evidence of housing bias in Portland. But the Fair Housing Council audit has proven a political headache for Fish and threatens to frustrate the city’s work on equal housing issues.
Moloy Good, the Fair Housing Council’s executive director, acknowledges the audit contains errors, but he stands by its basic conclusions…
Fish says the city’s painful lesson in this case won’t stop future testing; he says the city plans to do another round this fall. “The public has to have confidence in these tests and the results,” Fish says. “Going forward, we need to fix the problem.”

Nevertheless, it is refreshing to see that not all anti-white propaganda is accepted, even by leftists, as the God-given truth.

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 6 Comments

Who's to blame for the mob black-on-white violence?

Watch this video:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2C302gLeqGg&w=560&h=345]
It is obvious that the blonde anchor, in the red shirt, very much wants to tell it like it is.  She knows that the problem is unruly blacks – and she knows that we know that this is so – but she is not allowed to use the word “black”.  Throughout the entire discussion, the word “black” (or any permutation of it) is not mentioned once.  It must be frustrating.
But what we do hear mentioned is “twitter” and “the internet”.  I am predicting that the media, and government, will use the flash mob phenomenon to push for restrictions on twitter and the internet.  What I see on the horizon is a grave threat to what remains of our freedom of speech.
This is their modus operandi:  Encourage, and allow, NAM’s to attack whites.  Then use those self-same attacks as an excuse to deprive whites of their rights.  When whites protest, they are called “racists” or “suspected terrorists”.

Posted in crime and violence, freedom of speech issues | 8 Comments

This is what a true conservative sounds like

I found this at Occidental Dissent:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDAodiAfi6U&w=560&h=345]
True, he may not be educated in racial matters, and the way he expresses his views on Islam is a bit extreme, but he’s got a lot of common-sense ideas.  The fact that leftists can’t stand him speaks in his favor.  I’d vote for him!

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 4 Comments