Retards at work in Israel

I came across this video, and it makes me wonder if the featured Israelis have I.Q.’s beyond single digits.   If they care so much for black Africans, nobody is stopping them from going to Africa and helping them there.  Either they are total morons, who believe that the Jewish State can remain Jewish even if it welcomes hordes of non-Jews into its borders, or they are especially evil people who wish to bring death to their own nation:
 
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra_V4Yk-0R8&w=420&h=345]
 
By the way, the lyrics of the song they are singing have to do with bringing peace upon them and the whole world – because everybody knows how large numbers of black Africans always bring peace.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 18 Comments

Why can't white celebrities have as much conviction as Katt Williams?

According to The Daily News:

Comedian Katt Williams isn’t really sorry for an anti-Mexican rant he made during a performance, he said on CNN on Saturday morning.
In fact, despite an apology attributed to him released by his publicist earlier this week, Williams said he “meant what I said and said what I meant.”
The controversial comments were caught in a video posted online. Williams, who was performing at the Celebrity Theater in Phoenix, asked a man in the crowd if he was a Mexican.
“It appears to me y’all like it over here a lot,” he said.
“Do you remember when white people used to say ‘Go back to Africa,’ and we’d have to tell them we don’t want to? So if you love Mexico, (expletive), get the (expletive) over there!”
It then got ugly – and Williams finished the argument with “We were slaves (expletive). You just work like that as landscapers.”
Williams said on CNN that he was just defending his country to one man – but couldn’t be racist because he had so many Mexican fans.
“If I had disrespected Mexicans, I wouldn’t have been able to get out of there alive,” the hot-mouthed comic said.
The non-apology was a quick turnaround from a statement his publicist released earlier in the week profusely apologizing for the bad joke.

I say, go ahead and disrespect Mexicans; disrespect anybody you want.  Just tell the truth.  If Mexicans find the truth to be disrespectful, then that would be their problem, not the speaker’s.  Now that whites have lost almost all self-respect and pride in their own heritage, perhaps there is a chance that they can relearn it from blacks and Mexicans.  If whites can reinfect themselves with tuberculosis, leprosy and God knows what else from the third world, then why can’t they also reinfect themselves with a healthy dose of racial pride and solidarity?

Posted in freedom of speech issues, immigration/ Hispanics | 8 Comments

A person? A painting?

I found this at  Strike the Root, and wanted to share it with the rest of y’all.  Truly amazing!
 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

New York Daily News: Black men more likely to cheat

Amren recently linked to an article, in the New York Daily News, that bemoaned the plight of black women.  Lost in the discussion about black women was an important statement about black men:

And if all this weren’t enough to leave black women on the wrong side of happy, unmarried black women have to contend with black men who, according to social science data, are more likely than any other group of men to maintain relationships with multiple women.

The mainstream media has a tendency to couch valid criticism of non-whites in terms that make it sound like the perpetrators are actually victims.  Thus we find statements such as black women “suffer from being overweight” or “rising tide of violence impacting historically African American neighborhoods “.  Here too, it is only permissible for them to make a negative statement about black men because it is framed in such a way that blacks (female blacks) are victims.
Now that the Daily News has admitted that black men are less faithful, will some of those foolish mudsharks take heed?

Posted in examples of propaganda, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 53 Comments

Flyer distribution is catching on

An anonymous reader has contacted me and told me that, inspired by unamused and myself, he has been distributing his own flyer, which he calls  HATE CRIME ALERT DENVER.   I know of others who have also been distributing flyers and to all of them I say, “keep up the good work!”
I recently went door to door and distributed a newer version of my “Stop the Hate” flyer.  On the reverse was a summary of an earlier post of mine dealing with the so-called racial discrimination in the Portland area.
I am considering distributing the following article, linked to at Amren:

The Racial Violence that Dare Not Speak Its Name

ByJohn T. Bennett
Recent flash mob violence has alerted Americans to a troubling wave of sadistic racial mayhem. A notable outbreak occurred in Denver in 2009, setting a pattern of delay, denial, and silence. Now that same scourge has returned to Denver, among many other places.
In 2009, a four month wave of mayhem broke out in Denver. There were at least 26 violent robberies committed by two black gangs.  The victims were — without exception — whites and Hispanics.  When the dust settled from that initial spate of violence, victims were left with injuriesranging from a skull fracture to broken noses and shattered eye sockets.  The local Denver ABC news affiliate summarized the crime spree:

Black gangs roaming downtown Denver often vented their hatred for white victims before assaulting and robbing them during a four-month crime wave, according to interviews and court records obtained by 7NEWS.

That is not the language of a conservative commentator; it’s simply a mainstream local news report from an American city that has witnessed widespread racial violence.
The first-hand accounts and surveillance videos of the 2009 attacks are shocking. These weren’t sucker punches or fair fights — the attackers swing madly and rapidly with a viciousness that can only come from blind cruelty.  The victims, who can be seen in interviews, were kind-looking, ordinary people.  The victims were mostly either gay or straight couples. They didn’t provoke the attacks in any conceivable way.  The attackers sometimes fractured skulls, or broke eye sockets, and left one victim in a coma.  There were a total of 26 attacks from July 17 to Nov. 17.
An incredible 38 people were arrested in connection with this campaign of racist violence. Thirty were ultimately charged, all black.  Has this number of arrests been made against any violent white supremacist or right wing organization in the last 50 years?
The story first came to light in 2009 when a source inside the Denver police department said that the department was “keeping the public in the dark” about the attacks.  Court documents show that the police did indeed have knowledge of a pattern of racial attacks, but remained silent for 27 days.  One victim complained that, had the police informed the public sooner, he could have protected himself.  The same group responsible for that violence is suspected in the murder of Andrew Graham, a young graduate student who was senselessly shot in 2010.
Late last month, Denver saw a possible return to violence, as couples leaving restaurants were being attacked by a group of black men with baseball bats. The Denver Police have renewed warnings of those attacks.
The brutality  in Denver is disturbingly similar to violence occurring elsewhere, nationwide.  In the last few months alone, a young white lady named Shaina Perry was taunted and beaten in Milwaukee.  A young white man named Carter Strange had his skull fractured by a mob in South Carolina.  Dawid Strucinski was beaten into a coma by a mob in Bayonne.  Anna Taylor, Emily Guendelsberger, andThomas Fitzgerald were beaten and kicked to the ground in separate Philadelphia flash mobs.  Every weekend in July, mobs have attacked in Greensboro, NC.  In a mostly-white suburb of Cleveland, witnesses reported large groups of “teens” walking through the streets, “shouting profanities and racial epithets,” and one man was viciously beaten while leaving a restaurant with his wife and friends.  In all of those cases, the victims were white and the attackers were black.
Then there are the ominous stories that no one has ever heard about. For instance, a mob of 150 “young people” descended on a small, predominantly white NJ town named Winfield Townshipduring a firefighters’ carnival. Perhaps the townspeople are merely lucky that there wasn’t violence. Isn’t the racial mob mentality scary enough that we shouldn’t have to wait for violence before we take it seriously?
It cannot be emphasized enough that these attacks often occur in suburban areas where the black groups have to leave their own neighborhoods and purposefully travel to areas that are predominantly non-black, to attack non-black victims. For instance, in one of the many flash mob attacks in Chicago, Trovulus Pickett, 17, was part of a group that attacked and robbed several victims, including a 68-year-old doctor.  The attacks occurred in the North Side, which is 15 miles away fromPickett’s home. This indicates a serious level of planning and potential racial targeting. If these were just run-of-the mill robberies, it wouldn’t be too surprising. But the social problem we’re looking at is large groups, sometimes numbering in the hundreds, sometimes armed, engaging in racially-focused violent crimes.
There is quite simply no way for a politically correct society to grasp these events, much less effectively deal with them.  Liberals have reached the depths of self-deception and self-censorship in response.  The Washington Post, New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune, have all openly stated that they will refuse  to report on the racial facts of these violent crimes. The Los Angeles Times explains that they don’t want to “unfairly stigmatize racial groups.” They prefer the soft bigotry of low expectations instead.
These flash mobs have turned the comfortable narrative of racism on its head. Politicians, the media, academics, and the legal community do not have the capacity to face the issue. The reigning dogma of white racism is too deeply entrenched. There is a small grievance industry built around condemning white racism and intolerance, real or imagined.  Indeed, the welfare state itself is in large part based on the assumption that whites need to give more to achieve racial equality, as reflected in President Obama’s lament that the civil rights movement didn’t focus on economic redistribution.

I left out the last paragraph so as to avoid running afoul of copyright laws – but the printed version has the entire article (front and back, font size 11.5).  Input is appreciated.


							
Posted in activism | 3 Comments

Leftists: "We must maintain high standards for our propaganda!"

Sometimes even leftists have a problem with the propaganda of other leftists, though they are rarely able to see it for what it is.  A while back, I posted about a study, funded by the City of Portland, that concluded there is a lot of anti-black and anti-Hispanic discrimination in the Portland housing market.  The Oregonian took the study and ran with it, assuming that it was justified and accurate.  The problems I listed, in my post, apply whether the study was properly done or not.
Now we read, in the Willamette Weekly, a Portland area leftist rag, that the study was actually flawed:

An Unreliable Housing Audit

A city-funded housing audit misrepresented evidence, making discrimination in Portland look worse than it really is.

…The audit set off howls of protest and frowning editorials about the city’s shameful treatment of minorities looking for a place to live.
But interviews and newly released records from the state Bureau of Labor and Industries show the audit is marred by errors and sloppy work, and that the Fair Housing Council withheld evidence that would have weakened claims that it had found discrimination. Although city officials believed Fair Housing Council testers did all their surveys in person, for example, at least some of their evidence of supposed discrimination against Latino testers was gathered over the phone.
As a result, the audit exaggerates the degree of housing discrimination it found. That raises questions about the reliability of the Fair Housing Council, a watchdog group that contracts with cities across Oregon to do audits.
City officials have refused to renew their contract with the Fair Housing Council and suspended negotiations for a new one Aug. 9 after discovering the audit was rife with problems.
“We have concluded the audit is not reliable,” City Commissioner Nick Fish, who oversees the Housing Bureau, tells WW. “There have been failures of communication and breakdowns of protocol. The test they gave us has been demonstrated to be something we cannot rely on.”

Will The Oregonian retract its earlier editorial?  Don’t hold your breath.  Furthermore, we should not be so certain that the “Fair Housing Council” did “sloppy work”.   It is more likely that it did good work, there is simply a misunderstanding of their goal.  Their goal is not to find out if there is discrimination against blacks and Hispanics; it is to find such discrimination at any cost.   A couple of the comments, on the Willamette Weekly’s site, even state as much.
None of the leftist powers-that-be are questioning that there is a lot of discrimination against blacks and Hispanics.  This is a matter of faith for them.  They only question the methodology in this particular study.  This is evident from the last part of the above article:

Fish says problems with the audit shouldn’t take away from the city’s plan to end discrimination in housing, which he says is supported by other evidence of housing bias in Portland. But the Fair Housing Council audit has proven a political headache for Fish and threatens to frustrate the city’s work on equal housing issues.
Moloy Good, the Fair Housing Council’s executive director, acknowledges the audit contains errors, but he stands by its basic conclusions…
Fish says the city’s painful lesson in this case won’t stop future testing; he says the city plans to do another round this fall. “The public has to have confidence in these tests and the results,” Fish says. “Going forward, we need to fix the problem.”

Nevertheless, it is refreshing to see that not all anti-white propaganda is accepted, even by leftists, as the God-given truth.

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 6 Comments

Who's to blame for the mob black-on-white violence?

Watch this video:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2C302gLeqGg&w=560&h=345]
It is obvious that the blonde anchor, in the red shirt, very much wants to tell it like it is.  She knows that the problem is unruly blacks – and she knows that we know that this is so – but she is not allowed to use the word “black”.  Throughout the entire discussion, the word “black” (or any permutation of it) is not mentioned once.  It must be frustrating.
But what we do hear mentioned is “twitter” and “the internet”.  I am predicting that the media, and government, will use the flash mob phenomenon to push for restrictions on twitter and the internet.  What I see on the horizon is a grave threat to what remains of our freedom of speech.
This is their modus operandi:  Encourage, and allow, NAM’s to attack whites.  Then use those self-same attacks as an excuse to deprive whites of their rights.  When whites protest, they are called “racists” or “suspected terrorists”.

Posted in crime and violence, freedom of speech issues | 8 Comments

This is what a true conservative sounds like

I found this at Occidental Dissent:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDAodiAfi6U&w=560&h=345]
True, he may not be educated in racial matters, and the way he expresses his views on Islam is a bit extreme, but he’s got a lot of common-sense ideas.  The fact that leftists can’t stand him speaks in his favor.  I’d vote for him!

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 4 Comments

The Left's obsession with penis size

I love it when the enemies of Truth comment on this blog; they tend to demonstrate what is wrong with the cultural Marxist Left.  For example, a commentator who calls herself Eliza, replied to Aoirthoir recently with this gem:

Aoirthoir your distaste for people who fight for the rights of the opressed is pathetic. Your arrogance in equating a strong woman with a mosquito is a demonstration of your intellectual deficiency. You know they say the dog with the loudest bark has the smallest dick.

When Aoirthoir replied that the Irish do, in fact, have the smallest penises on average, she had nothing more to say and has not been seen since.  This is because the end-all and be-all of existence is, for them, to have a large penis.  Once they realized that the secret to happiness – and to always being right – is a large penis, the Left was faced with a problem:  What about women?  I’m pretty sure feminism, and its shrill hysterics, has something to do with the answer.
Speaking of shrill hysterics, I came across an article by the notorious hate-monger Tim Wise recently.  He loves to imagine himself debunking the science of race-realism.  Among other things he writes:

Rushton, of course, says little or nothing about this most recent evidence of black IQ gains; rather, he merely repeats the same arguments he has made for two decades: arguments that, in the end, are barely more scientifically sound than when he used to go into Toronto shopping malls and ask passersby how far they could ejaculate because he believed ejaculatory distance (and for that matter, penis size) to be inversely related to intelligence. Since one can only assume Phil Rushton considers himself quite intelligent, one can then glean fairly easily what he has told us about his manhood, given his own quackish theories.

One could only imagine what a court of law, run by race-denialist officials, would look like.  No testimony, nor evidence, would be needed.  The judge would merely have each party drop his pants and the one with the largest penis would win.  The other one would be sent to… a penal colony?
A while back, I wrote about a blogger named Zek Evets and his feeble attempt to debunk HBD.  Sure enough, when reading the comments on his blog post against HBD, one of them stated:

@ brothawolf: I do believe they’re self absorbed. It’s the small penis syndrome, methinks. I took the time (yuckily) to peruse some of the links Zets provided and came up brain fried, thus empty!.

Zek responded by agreeing “yes, I wouldn’t be surprised if these race-realists exhibit Napoleon/Small-Penis complexes, haha!”  Well, I don’t think we have a good argument against that kind of reasoning so we might as well concede!
Even non race-realists have noticed the liberal tendency to whip out the  “small-penis” accusation, and fling it at every opportunity.  On the web, we find questions such as:  “Why do liberals say you must be overcompensating for a small penis if you do/own masculine things?”  Or links to  images such as this:

Now that we understand the leftist mentality (and no, I’m not talking about you, Robert Lindsay) about truth and falsehood, good and bad, virtue and evil – that it all comes down to penis size, it is not difficult to understand their infatuation with blacks.  The leftist establishment is dominated by women and feminized men – so they admire what they believe is the most naturally masculine man:  The black man.  Their reasoning is:

Big penis = good
Black man = big penis
Therefore black man = good

I’ll grant them that, even though it is not possible to think with one’s penis, it is a fact that “I.P.” comes before “I.Q.” – but only by one letter.  The difference is not statistically significant.
What would they say if they found out that some race-realists actually do have large penises?  Would they then bow down to us?  Who would volunteer – and would it stand up in a court of law?

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 25 Comments

The wisdom in wisdom teeth

Today I visited the dentist.  While chatting with my lovely dental hygienist, the subject of wisdom teeth came up.  She mentioned that hers never erupted, and that this had saved her a lot of trouble.  She jokingly said that she was “more advanced”.  What she meant, of course, was that her jaw is too small to accommodate wisdom teeth and that this means she is further along the evolutionary path, that humans have taken, toward smaller jaws.
I’ve always suspected there are racial disparities when it comes to wisdom teeth; that blacks would have less trouble with them, due to their larger jaws, than whites or Asians.  In fact, I’ve even asked dentists about this – but have never gotten a straight answer.
In the “Complete Guide for Having Children with Perfect Teeth” (2007), Dr. Francis Glen and Dr. William Glen write (pg. 116):

Less than two percent of American Caucasians have normal shaped and normal spaced wisdom teeth.  A significant percentage of African-Americans do have both the jaw room and the proper shape for their third molars.  Therefore, almost all white teenagers should have their wisdom teeth removed and about half the African-Americans need them out.  Our experience with Oriental-Americans is limited but they seem to have the same problems with space and shape as do Caucasian-Americans.

This is yet another nail in the coffin of  the “race is a social construct” myth.  Any intelligent person, when confronted with the above fact, would be open to the possibility that there might be other (non-superficial) racial differences that society is loath to talk about.  Of course, the ability to accommodate wisdom teeth is not evidence, in and of itself, that blacks have a lower average intelligence than whites and Asians, but coupled with low test scores and high crime rates, it should help point in that direction.
I would have to agree with the hygienist; she is more advanced, and she is beautifully white.

Posted in racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 29 Comments