The Left's obsession with penis size

Posted on August 30, 2011 by jewamongyou

I love it when the enemies of Truth comment on this blog; they tend to demonstrate what is wrong with the cultural Marxist Left.  For example, a commentator who calls herself Eliza, replied to Aoirthoir recently with this gem:

Aoirthoir your distaste for people who fight for the rights of the opressed is pathetic. Your arrogance in equating a strong woman with a mosquito is a demonstration of your intellectual deficiency. You know they say the dog with the loudest bark has the smallest dick.

When Aoirthoir replied that the Irish do, in fact, have the smallest penises on average, she had nothing more to say and has not been seen since.  This is because the end-all and be-all of existence is, for them, to have a large penis.  Once they realized that the secret to happiness – and to always being right – is a large penis, the Left was faced with a problem:  What about women?  I’m pretty sure feminism, and its shrill hysterics, has something to do with the answer.
Speaking of shrill hysterics, I came across an article by the notorious hate-monger Tim Wise recently.  He loves to imagine himself debunking the science of race-realism.  Among other things he writes:

Rushton, of course, says little or nothing about this most recent evidence of black IQ gains; rather, he merely repeats the same arguments he has made for two decades: arguments that, in the end, are barely more scientifically sound than when he used to go into Toronto shopping malls and ask passersby how far they could ejaculate because he believed ejaculatory distance (and for that matter, penis size) to be inversely related to intelligence. Since one can only assume Phil Rushton considers himself quite intelligent, one can then glean fairly easily what he has told us about his manhood, given his own quackish theories.

One could only imagine what a court of law, run by race-denialist officials, would look like.  No testimony, nor evidence, would be needed.  The judge would merely have each party drop his pants and the one with the largest penis would win.  The other one would be sent to… a penal colony?
A while back, I wrote about a blogger named Zek Evets and his feeble attempt to debunk HBD.  Sure enough, when reading the comments on his blog post against HBD, one of them stated:

@ brothawolf: I do believe they’re self absorbed. It’s the small penis syndrome, methinks. I took the time (yuckily) to peruse some of the links Zets provided and came up brain fried, thus empty!.

Zek responded by agreeing “yes, I wouldn’t be surprised if these race-realists exhibit Napoleon/Small-Penis complexes, haha!”  Well, I don’t think we have a good argument against that kind of reasoning so we might as well concede!
Even non race-realists have noticed the liberal tendency to whip out the  “small-penis” accusation, and fling it at every opportunity.  On the web, we find questions such as:  “Why do liberals say you must be overcompensating for a small penis if you do/own masculine things?”  Or links to  images such as this:

Now that we understand the leftist mentality (and no, I’m not talking about you, Robert Lindsay) about truth and falsehood, good and bad, virtue and evil – that it all comes down to penis size, it is not difficult to understand their infatuation with blacks.  The leftist establishment is dominated by women and feminized men – so they admire what they believe is the most naturally masculine man:  The black man.  Their reasoning is:

Big penis = good
Black man = big penis
Therefore black man = good

I’ll grant them that, even though it is not possible to think with one’s penis, it is a fact that “I.P.” comes before “I.Q.” – but only by one letter.  The difference is not statistically significant.
What would they say if they found out that some race-realists actually do have large penises?  Would they then bow down to us?  Who would volunteer – and would it stand up in a court of law?

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 25 Comments

The wisdom in wisdom teeth

Posted on August 29, 2011 by jewamongyou

Today I visited the dentist.  While chatting with my lovely dental hygienist, the subject of wisdom teeth came up.  She mentioned that hers never erupted, and that this had saved her a lot of trouble.  She jokingly said that she was “more advanced”.  What she meant, of course, was that her jaw is too small to accommodate wisdom teeth and that this means she is further along the evolutionary path, that humans have taken, toward smaller jaws.
I’ve always suspected there are racial disparities when it comes to wisdom teeth; that blacks would have less trouble with them, due to their larger jaws, than whites or Asians.  In fact, I’ve even asked dentists about this – but have never gotten a straight answer.
In the “Complete Guide for Having Children with Perfect Teeth” (2007), Dr. Francis Glen and Dr. William Glen write (pg. 116):

Less than two percent of American Caucasians have normal shaped and normal spaced wisdom teeth.  A significant percentage of African-Americans do have both the jaw room and the proper shape for their third molars.  Therefore, almost all white teenagers should have their wisdom teeth removed and about half the African-Americans need them out.  Our experience with Oriental-Americans is limited but they seem to have the same problems with space and shape as do Caucasian-Americans.

This is yet another nail in the coffin of  the “race is a social construct” myth.  Any intelligent person, when confronted with the above fact, would be open to the possibility that there might be other (non-superficial) racial differences that society is loath to talk about.  Of course, the ability to accommodate wisdom teeth is not evidence, in and of itself, that blacks have a lower average intelligence than whites and Asians, but coupled with low test scores and high crime rates, it should help point in that direction.
I would have to agree with the hygienist; she is more advanced, and she is beautifully white.

Posted in racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 29 Comments

America's fault

Posted on August 26, 2011 by jewamongyou

In the aftermath of the recent horrific attack on a Mexican casino, which killed around 60 people, Mexican president Filipe Calderon is blaming the U.S. for the tragedy.  Mexicans murder Mexicans in Mexico – and it’s the Gringo’s fault.  Reuters reports:

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) – President Felipe Calderon declared three days of mourning on Friday and demanded a crackdown on drugs in the United States after armed men torched a casino in northern Mexico, killing at least 52 people…

Lashing out at corrupt officials in Mexico and “insatiable” U.S. demand for drugs for fomenting the violence, Calderon urged Congress to stamp out drug consumption and stop illegal trafficking of weapons across the border into Mexico.

“We’re neighbors, we’re allies, we’re friends, but you are also responsible,” a somber and angry Calderon said to the United States in a speech after meeting his security advisers.

We should ask, just how many more resources does Calderon expect the U.S. to pour into the black hole of the War on Some Drugs?  According to the Drug War Clock, the U.S. has already spent almost $20,000,000,000 this year alone.  Does this take all the costs into account?  Definitely not!  When I needed an effective antihistamine, I was forced to drive to Washington State to get it – because Oregon requires a prescription for those, and that would involve a lot of time and a copay.  The clock certainly does not take into account the extra gasoline I had to purchase for the drive, the extra wear and tear on my car, the extra time and the pollution involved in the trip.  The clock does not take into account the lost productivity of the many people who languish in prisons and jails due to drug charges.  It doesn’t take into account the taxes those people would have been paying if only they were allowed to work as free people.  It fails to take into account the children who must grow up without parents, the divorces, the lawsuits, the extra expenses companies must spend for drug testing, the people who suffer for want of enough pain pills, the people who die for lack of a “controlled substance”, the cash and property forfeitures that innocent citizens suffer at the hands of police – justified by suspicion alone – or the general erosion of liberties we’ve experienced as a byproduct of this war.  All this is not enough for Calderon.  Does he expect the U.S. government to conduct surprise raids on random houses, stop random people in the street for urine analyses, execute drug users on the spot with no trial?
But Calderon is right.  It is the fault of the U.S. – because the U.S. pursues this insane war and pressures other countries, including Mexico, to do so as well.   It is also Calderon’s fault for lacking the kahunas to tell the U.S. to take it’s War on Some Drugs and shove it.  If he did do this, there is little doubt that the drug cartels would be after his head – but sixty people, who were just trying to make a living or have some fun, would still be alive today.  If you have time, please watch this video.  The historic role of the U.S., in coercing the rest of the world to join its War on Some Drugs, is laid out starting at position 22:30.  Because the video is a long one, and I’m recovering from a long day at work, I’ll wait until later to finish viewing the whole thing.  Hopefully some of y’all will beat me to it and give your feedback and tomorrow will bring part two of this post.

Posted in libertarian thought | 16 Comments

Stupid police, stupid burglar… smart kid

Posted on August 24, 2011 by jewamongyou

If somebody breaks into your house, and you find a broken window in the garage, it’s not very hard to figure out that the burglar might have entered through the garage window.  If you’re looking for your stolen property, a logical place to start would be the local pawn shop.  So the 12 year old girl in this video, though smart, motivated and cute, needn’t be a genius to figure out what she figured out.  She only had to be smarter than the cops and the  burglar.

CNN is only giving us one third of the story here.  They’re telling us about a very presentable, well-spoken (except for the word “ask”) and mature, girl.  They are not telling us about the details of obvious police incompetence, nor are they belaboring the incredible stupidity of the burglar who pawned the furniture at the local pawn shop and used his real I.D.*  Were the investigating police black affirmative action hires?  Who was the burglar?  We are not told, but my guess is that all parties were black.  The media, of course, focuses only on the rose among the thorns – the girl.  Her actions are commendable and she does deserve her own story, but there never would have been a story had the police done their job or had the burglar had a few more I.Q. points.

* I’m assuming, since it was furniture that was stolen, that the burglar had a vehicle.  Furthermore, he had his own I.D.  – so we are not talking about a child here.

Posted in examples of propaganda | 5 Comments

My proposition to the Mainstream Media

Posted on August 23, 2011 by jewamongyou

They finally dropped all the charges against Dominique Strauss-Kahn.  It seems prosecutors realized that the crazy African woman cannot be trusted:

A judge Tuesday dismissed all charges against former International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a day after prosecutors said the hotel maid who had accused him of trying to rape her could not be trusted.

We are reminded of the Duke lacrosse case, when a similarly dysfunctional black woman accused some white jocks of having raped her during a party.  That case went on for a very long time, with the mainstream press and most of the power structure at Duke University desperately wanting to believe the accusations were true.  To this day, some die hards continue to believe there was substance to her accusations.
The leftist establishment keeps getting its hopes up every time some crazy black woman accuses a white man of having raped her, and each time the case fizzles.  The mainstream media wants very much for a high-profile white on black rape to take place.  That way they can point to it, ignoring the hundreds of thousands of recent black on white rapes, and say “We told you so!  The white man IS evil.”
I’ve fallen on hard times financially – so I was thinking about offering the leftist powers that be a proposition:  Give me ten million dollars and I’ll rape a black woman.  Not one of those large gorilla-like ones (I would charge at least twenty million and free therapy for that).  She has to be fairly decent-looking – and no STD’s.  It’s true I’ll probably spend a few years in prison, but after that I’ll be set for life.  I’ll never have to work again.  As for the media, they can publish large-font headlines on the front page:  “Racist blogger rapes black woman!”  The victim can go on the talk circuit and bask in fame and money.  She’ll never have to work again either.  The media will be happy, I’ll be happy, the victim will be happy.  Everybody will be happy!
The only catch is… nobody can be allowed to read this; it’s top-secret.  If you have already read it, you must not tell anybody about it and you must forget it.

Posted in crime and violence, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 28 Comments

Inverted perspectives on eugenics

Posted on August 22, 2011 by jewamongyou

Somebody recommended I visit www.thoughtware.tv and check out some of their videos.   It’s revolting that they include a presentation by the notorious anti-white hate-monger Tim Wise.  But I did take the time to watch the following video, also on YouTube:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtsmiP5Tfk4&w=560&h=345]
It is clear that the narrator is, for the most part, opposed to James Watson’s views on eugenics.  I found it particularly interesting that some of the “leftist” stances against eugenics would normally be considered “conservative”.  It is Watson advocating change and leftists (or at least what I would call “leftists”) arguing for leaving nature alone and retaining the status quo.  It is Watson saying there is nothing sacred about our D.N.A., and that we should definitely tweak it, and leftists implying that our D.N.A. is sacred and shouldn’t be messed with.  It is Watson advocating equality and fairness while leftists tout the virtues of diversity in intellect, personality and capabilities.
At one point, an anti-eugenics, manic-depressed woman (who happens to be a professor and accomplished author) tells us that it is unacceptable to insult somebody’s D.N.A., and that nobody has the right to tell her not to have children.  I couldn’t help but wonder if she holds the same opinions when it comes to whites being constantly told to refrain from having children.  Does she get upset over this too?  I doubt it.
It was interesting watching the same woman tell us how important diversity is, even as forces much more powerful than herself are working toward the elimination of her own race from the face of the Earth.  She probably supports those forces with vigor.
There was one conversation that I found somewhat disturbing.  When they were interviewing the family with the mongoloid child, the father described an experience at the beach and the joy he, and his son, felt when the child was able to ride a wave on his own.  For some reason, I was reminded of the countless white people I’ve noticed who are accompanied by dogs.  As I’ve been out and about, enjoying what little Summer we have here in Oregon, I’ve seen them everywhere.  Lots of overweight (apparently) single white men spending quality time with their dogs.  Lots of older (possibly single) white women with dogs and yes, even families with dogs.  The dogs obviously give their masters much pleasure.  I wonder how much difference there is, in their innermost minds, between the pleasure they get from their dogs and the pleasure the parent of a mongoloid child gets from his child.  If I were to walk up to a single-man-with-dog and offer him a mongoloid child (of his own – let’s assume, for argument’s sake, that it’s possible) to replace his dog, would he accept the offer?  The answer is, of course, “no”.  So, not to diminish the humanity of the mongoloid child, but wouldn’t those parents have been just as happy had they aborted the baby and got a dog instead?*
And this brings me to another point, aren’t leftists supposed to be pro-choice?  It seems to me that, when it comes to eugenics, the Left attaches a lot of value to kids who have not been born yet, while the eugenics-friendly right (granted, only a small segment of the right) is more willing to sacrifice them.
As for Watson, I was galled by his claim, at the end, that he is not concerned about insulting anybody, that all he cares about is telling the truth.  This certainly did not seem to be the case when he grovelled at the feet of the morons of the world, back in 2007, when he let slip a “hate-fact” about Africans.
*Yes, I realize how offensive this comment of mine will be to a lot of readers;  I’m not saying that a dog is the same as a handicapped child, just that one reminded me of the other in certain ways.

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists, Uncategorized | 17 Comments

White identity versus cults

Posted on August 20, 2011 by jewamongyou

There is precious little literature on race and cult membership.  The fact that so little seems to have been written about any correlation implies that whites are more likely to join cults than other races.  This is because, if blacks (for example) were more likely to join cults, we would certainly be hearing about it – very frequently.  There are only two reasons for such silence:  1)  All races are equally vulnerable to cults or 2)  Whites are more vulnerable to cults.  Since it is difficult to imagine racial parity in such matters, nor is there any logical reason to expect it, we are left with reason #2.
But in The Appeal of the Cults, Roger Fleming writes:

A typical cult member is white (although color or race restrictions are not characteristic of the cults); he or she is from the middle or upper‑middle class of society in this country‑, he or she usually has at least some college education or is a potential college student, and he or she has had at least a nominally religious upbringing.

Much has been written about why people join cults, but it mostly boils down to craving a sense of belonging.  Why would whites be more likely to join cults?  There are, no doubt, various factors that come into play, but the fact that whites are not allowed to derive a sense of belonging from their own race/ethnic group certainly leaves a void.  I know, from my own personal experience, that Jews who leave Judaism will often pounce from Judaism directly into the arms of another religion.  This religion is often Liberalism.  Sometimes it is Christianity.  If they are exposed to a cult at the crucial moment, then they are likely to join the cult.  A person who abandons a religion will usually have no intention of also giving up his sense of belonging – and yet it was precisely his religion that had, until that point, most likely provided his sense of belonging.  He will seek a substitute.
Primates are tribal creatures and humans are no exception.  I have written about this previously.  A tribe provides a sense of belonging, with all its trappings.  To say that all humans belong to the same tribe (or race) means nothing.  It is like saying all mammals belong to the same class; it does nothing to erase the distinctions between sloths and giraffes, and the wildebeest that stresses its commonality with the lion will soon find itself at the wrong end of a meal.
By depriving whites of their natural sense of ethnic/racial identity, the hostile elite makes them easy prey to cults in all their forms.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites | 15 Comments

Initial draft of The Ashkenazi Revolution done

Posted on August 20, 2011 by jewamongyou

There is still a lot of work to be done, editing, annotating and writing the foreword.  But I also want to convert the Hebrew hard-copy original into a PDF document.  I am open to suggestions as to how best to do this without spending a lot of money.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | 11 Comments

The last survivor of the infamous Bataan March dies at 105

Posted on August 18, 2011 by jewamongyou

It’s sobering to think that Albert Brown was not much younger than I when the Japanese forced him, and 78,000 other U.S. and Filipino soldiers, malnourished and sickly, to march 65 miles to the prison camp.  This was in early 1942 and, after his release, doctors told him not to expect to live more than a decade due to the damage he had sustained through beatings, malnutrition and disease.
His story is told, albeit briefly, at History.com:

Born in 1905 in North Platte, Nebraska, Albert Neir Brown was enrolled in ROTC during high school and while attending dental school. Called to active duty in 1937, he reported to Minneapolis’ Fort Snelling, leaving behind his wife, his three children and his practice. In 1941 Brown shipped out to the Philippines, where on December 7—the day of the Pearl Harbor attack—the Japanese army launched a three-month offensive against Allied forces known as the Battle of Bataan.
Weakened by intense fighting and dwindling food supplies, 78,000 American and Filipino troops surrendered to the Japanese on April 9, 1942. Their captors forced them on a torturous 65-mile trek to a Japanese prison camp, shooting or beheading those who stumbled or fell behind the column. Violence, exhaustion, starvation and disease claimed the lives of an estimated 11,000 men in just six days. After the war, the Japanese general who led the infamous Bataan Death March would be charged with crimes against humanity and executed for his role in the numerous fatalities.
Nearly 40 when he trudged through the Philippines, Brown watched as scores of younger men perished around him, secretly documenting the ordeal with a nub of pencil and tiny tablet he hid in the lining of his bag. He then spent three years in a prison camp, surviving on three small rice balls a day and contracting a series of tropical illnesses. Brown suffered regular beatings at the hands of the guards, who on one occasion severely injured his back by throwing him down a flight of stairs and on another fractured his neck with a rifle blow…
Brown died last Sunday at a nursing home in Nashville, Illinois. He is survived by two children, 12 grandchildren, 28 great-grandchildren and 19 great-great-grandchildren. A book entitled “Forsaken Heroes of the Pacific War: One Man’s True Story,” which chronicles Brown’s experiences during World War II, was published earlier this year.

He was the last survivor of that atrocity, which came to symbolize Japanese brutality in the eyes of many Americans.  I would venture to guess that he avoided Japanese cars to his last driving day.
On Wikipedia, we can gain some insight into the horrors of that march:

In June, 2001 U.S. Congressional Representative Dana Rohrabacher described the horrors and brutality that the prisoners experienced on the march:

“They were beaten, and they were starved as they marched. Those who fell were bayoneted. Some of those who fell were beheaded by Japanese officers who were practicing with their samurai swords from horseback. The Japanese culture at that time reflected the view that any warrior who surrendered had no honor; thus was not to be treated like a human being. Thus they were not committing crimes against human beings.[…] The Japanese soldiers at that time […] felt they were dealing with subhumans and animals.”

Trucks were known to drive over some of those who fell or succumbed to fatigue, and “cleanup crews” put to death those too weak to continue. Marchers were harassed with random bayonet stabs and beatings.
From San Fernando, the prisoners were transported by rail to Capas. 100 or more prisoners were stuffed into each of the trains’ boxcars, which were unventilated and sweltering in the tropical heat. The trains had no sanitation facilities, and disease continued to take a heavy toll on the prisoners. After they reached Capas, they were forced to walk the final 9 miles to Camp O’Donnell.  Even after arriving at Camp O’Donnell, the survivors of the march continued to die at a rate of 30-50 per day, leading to thousands more deaths. Most of the dead were buried in mass graves that the Japanese dug out with bulldozers on the outside of the barbed wire surrounding the compound.
The death toll of the march is difficult to assess as thousands of captives were able to escape from their guards (although many were killed during their escapes), and it is not known how many died in the fighting that was taking place concurrently. All told, approximately 5,000–10,000 Filipino and 600–650 American prisoners of war died before they could reach Camp O’Donnell.

Here is a piece of American anti-Japanese propaganda, also from Wikipedia:

Fast forward to our own time.  How many whites have been murdered, recently, by rampaging, feral blacks, Mexican drunk drivers and other dangerous immigrants?  Read through the list composed by the blogger Century of Blood and ask yourself:  What are YOU going to do about it?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

Even their "saints" are devils

Posted on August 17, 2011 by jewamongyou

I just found, through Amren, an account of a speech by Desmond Tutu where he calls for a tax on whites in South Africa.  The article reads in part:

Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu has called for a “wealth tax” to be imposed on all white South Africans…
Moments earlier, he had told the whites in the conference room: “You all benefited from apartheid. Your children went to fancy schools, you lived in posh suburbs.”
He stressed, however, that this did not mean all whites had supported apartheid.
Speaking to the Cape Argus after his speech, Tutu expanded on his wealth tax call.
“There were many in the white community who were ready for this (at the time of the TRC process).
“It could be quite piffling, maybe 1 percent of their stock exchange holdings. It’s nothing. But it could have helped… maybe building new homes, and that would have been an extraordinary symbol of their readiness.”
Asked whether he was again calling for a “wealth tax”, Tutu said: “That’s what I’m saying.”

A “wealth tax” that applies only to whites.  Most people would call this a “white tax” or a “jizyah“.  If Tutu meant that only wealthy people would have to pay it, then why did he single out whites?  There are plenty of poor whites in South Africa.
Another thing that bothers me about Tutu’s speech, is that he claims blacks in South Africa suffer from “self-hatred”.  I doubt that blacks anywhere suffer from self-hatred.  They seem to be genetically inclined to have the highest self-esteem of any race.  This is one reason their suicide rates are so low.  Tutu’s comment about being in an airplane (also quoted at Amren)…

He also recounted how a while ago he had been on a Nigerian plane with two black pilots at the helm.
“We suddenly hit heavy turbulence and my first thought was that there wasn’t a white man in the cabin to bring us back to safety.

… is merely an example of his subconscious recognition, that whites tend to be more competent than blacks, coming to the surface.  When white leftists experience such lapses, they berate themselves for “racism”.  When a black does it, he pities himself for being a victim of racism.
Perhaps South Africa should impose a “jizyah” on its blacks for their ridiculously high crime rates, corruption, littering and overall high cost to society.  This would make more sense.  But no.  According to Tutu, all these black shortcomings are the fault of the white man, and that same white man, who built the nation of South Africa out of nothing, should be required to throw even more money into the black hole – as if the murders, rapes and robberies he is subject to are not enough.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 10 Comments