Mob rule does not recognize freedom of speech

Posted on January 28, 2011 by jewamongyou

Even the smallest candle can banish darkness.  This is why the forces of darkness cannot tolerate a peaceful meeting of race-realists.  Last year, these cowardly terrorists, whose “activism” involved threatening the lives of hotel employees, succeeded in reducing the scale of the American Renaissance conference.  This blog is a direct result of that setback.  This year, their efforts will only amount to some minor inconveniences.  The conference will take place.
So desperate are the hate-mongers that no laws of morality or civility hold them back; given the chance, they would gladly choose violence to accomplish their goals.  Human life and liberty mean nothing to them as they are cut from the same cloth as Stalin and Mao.  Thus it is no surprise that the acting mayor of Charlotte, Chris D’Angelo Cannon, publicly urged hotels the refuse Amren’s business and to cancel their prior contract.  Since Cannon is mayor and a city council member, anything he says publicly is understood to be the voice of government.  The first amendment is supposed to protect us from such intrusions.
While it is true that hotels may choose to ignore the mayor’s wishes, they are surely aware that doing so might have repercussions at some later date.  Council of Conservative Citizens writer Kyle Rogers correctly writes:

He abused the office of mayor by using it to bully a local Sheraton Hotel into canceling a reservation by American Renaissance. An anti-democratic tactic usually reserved for dictators like Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe.
Cannon portrays himself as some sort of hero for black people, for getting the Sheraton to cancel. He says white people should not be able to organize and speak about race in Charlotte. He shows EXTREME hypocrisy when it comes to black people. He is a life member of the NAACP. He belonged to an all black fraternity in college. He is a member of the Charlotte Black Political Caucus, and the National Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials.

I posed the question, “is this not a violation of our first amendment?” to a friend today.  His response was that, if his behavior is unacceptable, then people should vote him out of office.  There are a couple of flaws in this answer:
a)  We are supposed to be living in a republic, where the rule of law stands even in opposition to the majority.  Freedom of speech and assembly are rights that are supposed to be guaranteed us by the Constitution.  They should not be subject to elections.
b) Some 40% of Charlotte is black or Hispanic.  These groups, due to cultural norms and constant indoctrination, are incapable of supporting the rights of groups they perceive as contrary to their own interests.  While individual NAM’s may rise above this mentality, the vast majority of them can never do so.  Between leftist whites and NAM’s, there can never be a majority of voters willing to stand up for the first amendment by voting Cannon out of office.  Racial dynamics make fair elections practically impossible.
c) The vast majority of citizens do not distinguish between “right” and “wrong”.  Instead, years of brain-washing have conditioned them to see only “good” and “bad”.  In their eyes, “racist = bad”.  Any sort of reasoning stops at this point.  Murder, rape, exile or torture are all perfectly alright as long as the victim is a “racist”*.  In their simplistic minds, a “racist” has no rights.  At the root of this mentality is the fact that they have no in-depth grasp of what a “right” is.  As far as they’re concerned a “right” is a “good thing” and, therefore, a “racist” does not deserve it.
At last year’s truncated conference, there was talk of legal action against those who interfered with our plans and denied us a proper venue.  To the best of my knowledge, nothing came of it.  I hope that this time, even after a successful conference, we actually do pursue legal action against Mr. Cannon.  I am not a lawyer, but I would think that every single one of us (conference attendees) should be able to sue him for usurping our constitutional rights.
*I put “racist” in quotations because very few people, who use this word, have any idea what it actually means.  “A Conversation About Race” illustrates this very well.

Posted in activism, freedom of speech issues, government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 2 Comments

Who owns the sanctity of victims?

Posted on January 27, 2011 by jewamongyou

A group of rabbis just condemned Glen Beck for using Holocaust imagery.  Sometimes I get the impression that Jewish leaders and clergy believe that…

We own the rights to the Holocaust.  We own the book rights, the movie rights and the screen-play rights.  Under no circumstances may anybody derive any lesson from the Holocaust without our approval.  The depiction of Nazis, Jewish victims or any incidental items or places must be within the context of our own ideals and goals.  Otherwise, it is offensive and must be condemned.  It is offensive because we have assigned our own beliefs to those victims.  Therefore, using them to further contrary beliefs would desecrate their memory.

The same exact attitude prevails regarding white victims of non-white crime.  The only difference is that, since the ongoing violence against whites is taboo, the only lessons we are allowed to learn from them are divorced from the victims’ race.  We may consider female victims to be part of a larger assault against females – but not “white females”.  We may consider child victims to be part of a larger assault against children – but not “white children”.  We may consider homosexual victims to be part of a larger assault against homosexuals – but not “white homosexuals”.  We may consider handicapped victims to be part of a larger assault against the handicapped – but not “handicapped whites”.  Otherwise, the only classification we are allowed to publicly recognize is that of “random violence”.  “Random violence” is another way of saying, “this assault has no larger meaning and fits into no larger context.”
When I wrote about the murder of Allyson Archibald, a while back, somebody was offended – because I connected her murder with a larger trend.  It seems that some people are more comfortable remaining blind to the facts of interracial crime so that they can imagine the loss of their loved ones as being “random”.  They say things like, “we don’t hate him because of his color we hate him because of what he did to her and our family.”  The implication is that I hate the murderer because he is black; not because he is a murderer.  How silly!
When people die, nobody owns their sanctity.  Everybody is free to learn from their deaths.  Nobody owns the rights.

Posted in examples of propaganda, Jewish stuff and Israel, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 3 Comments

Nature versus nurture and Jack LaLanne

Posted on January 26, 2011 by jewamongyou

The great fitness icon of the 20th century has departed this Earth at the ripe old age of 96.  My generation grew up with Jack LeLanne and, for a long time, his name was almost synonymous with fitness.  As if it were yesterday, I remember his boast that he would live to 150.
LeLanne belonged to an era when people believed man could transcend his genetic destiny if only he could control his behavior and what goes into his body.  Of course, not everybody in that era bought into this philosophy; it was mainly hippies and their sympathizers on the Left.  Certain members of my own family seem to have been of the opinion that they could live to extreme old age, and retain the rigors of youth indefinitely if only they maintained a vegan lifestyle and practiced enough of whatever physical discipline they favored.  All of those hippies are now growing old; in the end, their genes are proving to be the greatest determinant of how they age and at what rate.  A few still cling to dreams of immortality, but I am fairly certain that the vast majority have begun to notice the tell-tale signs that Mother Nature gives us as hints that our time is nigh.
When it comes to I.Q.,  stubborn tenacity is still the rule.  Despite all the evidence, the average joe on the street will tell you that nurture is the main determinant of I.Q.  Perhaps this is because, unlike aging, I.Q. does not manifest itself so clearly.  Lower I.Q. people often look just like higher I.Q. people.  I recently wrote about an amazingly intelligent girl and how even the mainstream media seems willing to admit that there might be a genetic component to intelligence in extreme cases of genius.   Perhaps, when it comes to extreme old age, their attitude will be the same.  Everybody agrees that those who die very young almost always do so mainly because of environment.  It might be that even the firmest believers in the dominant role of nurture will agree that genetics must play a vital role in those who live to be 115.  Just as environment tends to do more harm than good when it comes to longevity, so to would it take the leading role in making people retarded – but only a passive role in making a person a genius.  In other words, environment can make a retard.  It can only allow a genius.  It can cause an early death.  It can only allow old age.  When it comes to the good things, environment is most beneficial when it allows desirable genes to express themselves.
We can only guess how long LaLanne would have lived had he eaten twinkies every day, smoked and passed his time on the couch.  But I think the more important question is: would his life had had just as much meaning?  Since physical fitness was what defined LaLanne, there should be no doubt that he chose the right path for himself.

Posted in nurture vs. nature and I.Q. | 3 Comments

Silver linings to an unpleasant event

Posted on January 25, 2011 by jewamongyou

How did I get from the Portland area to Southern Oregon?  In the past, I had always driven.  It’s a 5 hour drive and usually a fairly pleasant one.  This time, I had opted to fly.  The cost of the air ticket was very reasonable and there would be no wear and tear on my car.  I got to the airport early and passed the time translating “The Ashkenazi Revolution”.  As my departure time approached, there were murmurs of weather problems in Southern Oregon.  It seems there was freezing fog and there was a chance our plane would not be able to land.  We were told, as we waited to board, that we might have to return to Portland (a one-hour flight).  Wisps of snow graced the mountains of Oregon but there was no sign of fog – until we reached Rogue Valley, our destination.  We descended and the landing gear moved into place.  At the last moment, only hundreds of feet from the ground, the landing gear was retracted and we ascended again into the air.  The pilot announced that he could not see the runway, but that we would try again since the fog was moving and things might improve.  After twenty minutes or so we tried again.  This time we could clearly see the ground and we were sure we would land.  But again, at the last moment, we pulled back up and the landing gear was retracted.  Moans and sighs filled the plane and it was announced that we must return to Portland.  Apparently, the pilot was not comfortable with the visibility.
As I sat contemplating my predicament and options, it occurred to me that others had it much worse.  The woman sitting across from me only had five hours to see her first granddaughter.  Her opportunity was lost.  Others had missed important meetings or connecting flights.  For me, it was just an inconvenience.  The previous few days, I had struggled to decide whether I would drive to the airport (and pay $30 in parking fees) or take the train.  Had I taken the train, my situation would have been much worse; I would have had to take the two-hour trip back home to my car so that I could drive it – or wait several hours at the airport.  Upon our return to Portland, we were told the next flight departed at 4:30 in the afternoon and it was only 10:00 at the time.
While we were all still in the same area, I loudly asked if anybody was interested in carpooling.  A young lady quickly answered in the affirmative.  She lived overseas and had no car.  I was the quickest way for her to get to her destination.  Nobody else expressed any interest, so it was just the two of us.  As it turned out, we talked the whole trip and she even got an education on white racial consciousness.  She insisted on buying a tank of gas for me and a little more.  So in the end, I saved some money and acquired a new friend.  I do hope that things turned out as well for others on that ill-fated trip.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

I'm off to visit family

Posted on January 22, 2011 by jewamongyou

Dear readers,
I’ll be visiting family, including my grandson, for the next few days.  So posting may be sparse.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

When ignorance is bliss

Posted on January 20, 2011 by jewamongyou

Countenance just posted about a T.V. show called “skins”:

If what they’re saying about Skins is true, then what grinds me is that it’s nowhere near true — High school students aren’t that hypersexual or promiscuous.  To the extent that today’s teenagers are perhaps looser in their personal conduct than they should be, Skins is only going to lure them into a false sense of superiority and smugness.  I think the same way about shows like Maury Povich — If you ever watch one of these shows, don’t you ever come away feeling better about yourself because your life isn’t as rotten as what you’ve seen in the last hour?

Actually I feel better about myself because I live my life in blissful ignorance of the goings on in the world of T.V. and, for the most part, the movies.  Even if they sometimes come up with good programs, I still despise them for what they have done to this once great country.  Nay, to this once great civilization.  For many years, I have taken pleasure when those around me carry on about their favorite celebrities – and I haven’t the vaguest idea what they are talking about.  Sometimes, I’ll even feign ignorance about professional sports; when co-workers talk about their favorite football teams, I might chime in to ask how many home-runs they scored.  If they look at me with exasperation, I consider it a form of preemptive revenge.  After all, if I spoke to them about practically anything on this blog, and they revealed their own ignorance of it, I might give them that same look.  It is a war of ignorance and, by God, I shall not be outdone!  In reality, however, they know me well enough to realize I do know the basics of sports – but my ignorance of celebrities is genuine.  Of this I am proud.  Those neurons can be put to better use.
Oh, by the way Countenance, I look forward to meeting you next month!

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Mainstream media admits to racial bias

Posted on January 20, 2011 by jewamongyou

After all the evidence, presented here and elsewhere, of media bias, it is refreshing to see the MSM finally admitting as much.  Unfortunately, they got confused and accused themselves of having a pro-white bias.  A black teenage girl is missing and MSNBC writes:

Media criticized on response to case of missing N.C. teen

Story not getting much play because she’s black? Mother pleads for help…

…Her disappearance has been reported in local media, NBC’s TODAY show and CNN. But a Baltimore police official told NBC News that had the missing person been white, the case might have received even more media attention, perhaps aiding investigators in finding a suspect.
“I think the question has to be asked. It’s not my position, I don’t know what goes into these decisions, but this is Baltimore’s Natalee Holloway case,” said Anthony Guglielmi, spokesman for the Baltimore Police Department. Holloway, then 18, disappeared in 2005 while on a high school graduation trip to Aruba. Her remains have never been found…

The fact that seems to escape MSNMC is that the vast majority of missing white girls also do not get much media attention beyond their image on a milk carton.  The children of the wealthy, or those who disappear under unusual circumstances (i.e. not in a big, crime-ridden, city) tend to get the attention.  To suggest that the MSM is somehow “pro-white” reveals a gross disconnect from reality.  At least a few of the comments called them on this folly.

Posted in examples of propaganda | 2 Comments

The Ashkenazi Revolution

Posted on January 19, 2011 by jewamongyou

A commenter, known as “latte island”, brought “The Ashkenazi Revolution” to my attention a while back.  The book was published in Israel in 1964 and was banned there – or, at least, suppressed and condemned.  Today, it is almost impossible to find, having been relegated to the dustbin of history and obscurity.  Note that I said almost impossible to find – for I have found it and I have purchased it.  It was not easy to find and it did not come cheap either.

I intend to translate all 256 pages of it.  This will be a mammoth task and very time-consuming.  Since I am not a wealthy man, my intention is to publish the translation in PDF format and ask for a modest donation to offset some of the costs of this project.  Upon receipt of the donation (which I think should be $20 or so) I’ll send the file via email.  I do not expect to be reimbursed for my time, just for the expense of the book itself.  It was $157 including shipping.
Here are the headings for the 14 chapters:
1)  The Jewish concept of time and space
2)  The community of peoples in the Land of Canaan
3)  Birth and exile
4)  The community of peoples in exile
5)  The undermining of the Roman world and the Ashkenazi question
6)  The new Hebrew literature
7)  Herzl and the new Hebrew literature
8)  Exile on exhibition
9)  The oppressive rule of the literary mandarins
10)  Ashkenaz and Sepharad in the nation of Israel
11)  Two peoples
12)  The strategic goal of the leaders of Sepharad
13)  The false world and the triumph of the achievers
14)  The Ashkenazi revolution
It is my understanding that the reason this book was so unpopular was that it was viewed as the epitome of the oppression of Sephardic/Oriental Jews in Israel.  This is what Meyrav Wurmser has to say about it:

One of the worst examples of the anti-Mizrahi discrimination involves The Ashkenazi Revolution published in 1964 by writer Kalman Katzenelson in which the author argues that the Mizrahim suffer from irreversible genetic inferiority that endangers the superiority of the Ashkenazi-Zionist state. He called for the establishment of an apartheid regime that, among other limitations, would abolish their political rights. He also objected to mixed marriages and demanded the prohibition of the Hebrew language because it resembled Arabic too greatly. Instead he demanded that Yiddish become the national language because of its supreme Germanic origins. His book was a bestseller until Ben-Gurion banned it.

Regular readers of this blog should already know that, when it comes to the State of Israel versus Oriental Jewry, I am on the side of Oriental Jewry.  Of course, there are some features of Oriental Jewish culture that we could do without: a lack of respect for the rule of law, littering and smoking all go hand in hand with the Arab world in general.  But just as the Arabs (flaws and all) are heirs to the wonderful Arabic language, so too are Oriental Jews heirs to some of the more authentic and ancient features of Judaism.  Aside from this, there is much to admire in their various cultures and much to admire among the actual people.  So let it not be said that my goal is to attack Oriental Jews.  Rather, my goal is to make this controversial work available to a wider audience so that each of us can judge it on its own merits.  I also feel that it is important from a historical point of view.
How long will it take to finish this project?  My guess is several months.  I have a Hebrew/English dictionary that is almost 4 inches thick.  It will be getting a lot of use; there will be difficult sections.  Most likely, I’ll have to go back and revise some of them over time.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | 25 Comments

Economic hardship takes toll on white shopping

Posted on January 18, 2011 by jewamongyou

Just recently I entered one of my favorite grocery stores and noticed numerous large signs stating “ALL SALES FINAL”, “WIC COUPONS NOT ACCEPTED” and “CHECKS NOT ACCEPTED”.  My assumption was that these sudden changes of policy had been implemented in response to dishonest customers taking advantage of the system to bilk the store.  I was flabbergasted when told by the cashier that the store is closing in February.  I had been shopping at this Haggens for years.
There are several reasons I enjoy shopping at Haggens: The employees are generally very friendly, there is an atmosphere of trust and they have always taken care of me when issues arose, they’ve got a great selection of candies, wines and bulk items and their staff and customers are almost entirely white and Asian.  As for this last item, it is the main reason there is an atmosphere of trust.  The notable absence of NAM’s makes shopping there a pleasant experience even if their prices are not always the best.
Just as in housing, it seems that many whites and Asians are willing to pay more in order to avoid places like Wal-Mart and WinCo.  The latter are large, crowded, noisy and contain many white female/black male couples and trashy whites.  In other words, the correlation between low I.Q. and low income is evident in such places.  With the current economic downturn, upscale (I.E. white) shopping outlets have been under increasing strain as their customers have been forced to save money by shopping elsewhere.  As one commenter on Yelp.com puts it:

…What a shame! The Haggen in Beaverton is a good store. High-end, independently [sic] stores are the most vulnerable during economic down times. Hope the day never comes where we’re all shopping for our food at Wal-Mart, Target, and WinCo.

Some, in the pro-white movement, have touted the recession as a good thing for whites.  They point to lower immigration and fewer benefits for NAM’s already here.  Unfortunately, it also forces poorer whites to associate more with NAM’s.  For some whites this means more than just an unpleasant shopping experience.  It means that they will be threatened, attacked and even lose their lives.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 8 Comments

MLK day – a "long weekend"

Posted on January 17, 2011 by jewamongyou

Errin Haines writes, in an AP story:

Many use the King holiday to celebrate King’s life and struggle for human rights. Some choose to honor King by following the Baptist preacher’s example of service to their fellow man. For others, the holiday is equal to Presidents’ or Columbus Day: Just an excuse for a long weekend, to take a short vacation or do nothing.

Haines forgot to mention that, for many of us, the forced long weekend amounts to severe inconvenience.  I have always found it interesting that most legal holidays are observed, for the most part, by the ruling class – and yes, I use this term loosely.  It is called a “bank holiday” and a “legal holiday”.  Is it not the bankers and politicians who lord over us?  Government offices are required to be closed and.  Wikipedia defines it thus:

A civil holiday, civic holiday, legal holiday, or work holiday is a day that is legally recognized and celebrated as a holiday in a particular sovereign state orjurisdictional subdivision of such, e.g., a state or a province and may be known as a public holiday. It is usually a day that the legislature, parliament, congress, orsovereign has declared by statute, edict, or decree as a non-working day when the official arms of government such as the court system are closed.

Of course, the postal service falls in this category.  Those who work in the services (other than government), manufacturing or retail do not benefit from this long weekend.  As a matter of fact, they suffer from it.  How many times have you been in a situation where a check had to clear the bank, or you desperately awaited something in the mail or you needed a government agency to take care of something for you (due to their own demands) and your agonizing wait was prolonged due to one of these long weekends?  The three-day weekends are generally a luxury for members of the ruling class and those who work directly for them.  Their idleness, at these times, imposes a burden upon the class of the ruled – those who’s labor has intrinsic value*.
In conclusion, the “long weekend” is just another tool of oppression.  A stark reminder of who rules over whom, just in case any of us were to somehow forget.  Perhaps it is no coincidence that the only American individual, to be honored by his own federal holiday, is named “King”.
* If the U.S. Postal service had intrinsic value (and here I mean a natural value that the free market would assign it absent any coercion), then there would be no need for laws enforcing its monopoly.

Posted in libertarian thought | 5 Comments