Protest photos

Posted on February 8, 2011 by jewamongyou

These are from our picket session in front of the Sheraton


… even the security guard there was sympathetic.  Well, not really – but we probably made his day by allowing him to feel useful for a few minutes.

Posted in activism | 16 Comments

Supremacists

Posted on February 7, 2011 by jewamongyou

Over the course of the last few trying days, some have called us “white supremacists”.  Some of us have retorted that we are not “supremacists”.  Rather, we are “race-realists” or “white advocates” or “white nationalists”.  The term “supremacist” has fallen into disfavor.  In the eyes of many, it implies that other races must be subjugated.  That they may justifiably be enslaved.  It implies absolutes.
But I have recently been translating the book “The Ashkenazi Revolution”.  When I promised that I would translate it, and when I actually purchased it, I had no idea what its content would be – though I did assume it would present the case that Ashkenazic Jews are, in some ways, superior to Sephardic Jews.  I now know that the book is unabashedly Jewish supremacist.  The author, a man by the name of Katzenelson, thought nothing of claiming the superiority of his own people, of my people.  It never seems to have occurred to him that his words might offend somebody – unless, perhaps, this is the reason he wrote it in Hebrew.  As it turned out, it offended a great many people.  But it would appear that his offence was that he insulted Oriental Jews and those their sympathizers.  It does not appear that his insults to non-Jews were an issue at all.
Some non-Jews might be willing to forgive him for this.  After all, claims of superiority of own’s own people can be useful for nation-building.  In the early sixties, the State of Israel was still in its infancy and it was under seige from enemies near and far – or, at least, this was the perception at the time.  Did not the Romans believe their superiority?  What about the Greeks or the Egyptians?  The British, during their heyday, certainly believed in the superiority of their own nation and civilization.  Each of the aforementined civilizations were, it could be argued, indeed superior each in their own time.  Certainly the belief in their superiority was instrumental in acheiving this.  It is a self-fulfilling prophesy.  Higher expectations lead to higher performance.  Ask any good parent.
Looking at the world around us, I think there definitely are grounds for claims of white superiority.  The dark masses, who make their way to white countries in their millions, have voted with their feet.  Their vote says: “white society IS superior.  This is why I have left my own inferior society.”
Of course there is a major difference between “the Romans”, “the British” and “whites”.  The former are nations while the latter is a macro-race.  A rough description of the indigenous inhabitants of Europe.  But, as most of us are well aware, whites are under attack everywhere they live.  Not a day goes by without hostile actions against whites being perpetrated upon them as a group (whether from within or from without).  This constant oppression is forming whites into a nation.  Not by choice, but by necessity.  Within the context of this new role, whites should feel superior if they wish to hold on to what is still theirs.
Even if we ignore the scientific evidence for racial differences in behavior, and focus instead simply on the facts on the ground, we can still claim our own superiority based on this alone.  The shameful behavior of certain non-white politicians, in sabotaging our recent conference, serves to underscore our superiority on the moral plane.
As for my misguided, and foolish, Jewish co-ethnics, who also contributed to this fiasco, it is not my place to apologize for them nor do I share any of their guilt – but, on the collective level, I do feel shame for their actions.  In their present state, they are too full of hate to see the light.  Perhaps some day, they will grow up and join our ranks.  Stranger things have happened.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 6 Comments

Quick overview of Amren conference

Posted on February 6, 2011 by jewamongyou

We just finished our activities in Charlotte, North Carolina and I am now en route home.  This is only a skeletal overview of the goings on over the past two days.

Two separate conferences took place in Charlotte this weekend.   One was the “official” Amren conference, which was supposed to include a live stream of the various invited speakers.  Due to technical difficulties, the live stream did not take place.  Instead, there will be a high-definition video of the speeches available in the near future (maybe already available).  The location of this conference was a carefully guarded secret and all we know is that it took place somewhere in Charlotte.

The second conference was a “shadow conference” and it was attended by some of those who were originally planning to attend the Amren conference as regular guests.  Not speakers.  This was coordinated by Matt Parrott and a young woman whose name I’m not sure she wants divulged.  We greatly enjoyed each other’s company and we were thrilled when Paul Fromm showed up to join us, speak and conduct a few interviews.  In addition to Fromm’s speeches, a few others also spoke; all these speeches will be available on YouTube in the near future.  I was among those who spoke – but I was not the best speaker by a long shot.

After these two small conferences were held, some of us took to the streets and picketed the original hotel, which had cancelled the reservation.  We took some photos of each other in front of the hotel and then at the nearby intersection.  It was a lot of fun and we got some thumbs up from passers-by.  These photos and videos will also be made available on YouTube in the near future.

For all the intelligent and insightful words we exchange on the internet, the actual goal is action on the street.  If our movement remains strictly a virtual one, it will be irrelevant.  So we feel that our street protest is the culmination of our efforts – and only the first of many others like it.  Hopefully, the sight of us standing publicly for all to see, and proud of what we stand for, will serve as an inspiration for others to do likewise.

Posted in activism, freedom of speech issues | 11 Comments

Don't worry; I'm still alive!

Posted on February 5, 2011 by jewamongyou

Or, for some of you, don’t get your hopes up; I’m still alive.  After spending most of yesterday in airplanes, I am now at the American Renaissance “shadow conference” in a secret bunker deep underground somewhere in North Carolina.  I’ll keep y’all posted when there is something to write about here.
On an unrelated note, I’m almost done with the first chapter of The Ashkenazi Revolution.  So far, it is nothing like I expected it to be.  It is interesting reading, if sometimes a bit silly (in my opinion).  The man was a hardcore Jewish supremacist, so the book will give lots of amunition to Jew-haters.  This causes me some misgivings but a promise is a promise – and it should be noted that the book was banned because it was deemed deeply offensive even among Jews.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

False bandanas

Posted on February 2, 2011 by jewamongyou

Why do protesters wear bandanas over their faces?  Ostensibly, it is to protect their identities so that those in power will not bash down their door at three A.M. to take them away in cuffs.  Palestinians wear bandanas when they protest or throw rocks at Jews.  They fear identification by Mossad.  This is quite understandable.  There are times and places that demand anonymity.
But would Communists wear bandanas in the old Soviet Union?  Would Republicans wear them during the Republican National Convention?  Then why do leftist activists, such as those who tried to disrupt the American Renaissance 2008 convention, wear them?  Why would homosexual teachers, in the U.S. feel obliged to wear them?
My guess is that many on the left consider it more fashionable to be counted among the oppressed than among the oppressors.  They live in a fantasy world that is roughly the equivalent of 1930’s America, where Jim Crow laws are the rule and the homosexual lifestyle is not tolerated.  It would seem that they do not realize that things have changed.  They wish to reap the benefits of being the rulers and, at the same time, maintain the notoriety of being members of an oppressed minority.

Here are some relevant comics I got from the humor section of Nation of Cowards.

 

 

 

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 4 Comments

American Renaissance conference cancelled

Posted on February 1, 2011 by jewamongyou

We have just received official word that the American Renaissance conference has been cancelled due to lack of venue.  I hold out hope that some of us can meet in Charlotte informally since we already have tickets.  Perhaps we can meet to picket the City Council building and protest.  This would be our “conference”.  Either way, I am disappointed on several levels and, of course, angered at the same time.  Jared Taylor is a trusting and honest man who lives in a cruel and devious world.  This is the ongoing tragedy of the human experience.
Surely American Renaissance will think outside the box next time.  I do wonder, however, how many of those who have now been burned twice will give them a third chance and sign up in the future.
Time is short – so please, all those who plan on being in Charlotte anyway, let me know.  If we can get a few of us there together, perhaps Mr. Taylor and some of the other speakers will grace us with their presence and we can make our modest get together happen.  Then we can do other group activities, such as visiting historic sites of the War between the States.

Posted in activism, freedom of speech issues | 18 Comments

Futuristic movies

Posted on February 1, 2011 by jewamongyou

One sad byproduct of growing old is that one’s neurons are transformed into morons.  Luckily for me, most of my moron-converts deal with useless knowledge like sports trivia and pop-culture.  But sometimes that knowledge is useful, for example when I wish to write about it in this blog.

I saw a movie preview recently that takes place in Britain circa 2050.  An investigative reporter is hot on the trail of a mysterious fire in an apartment complex.  As he closes in on his query, the plug is pulled on his assignment; he was getting too close to revealing a corporate secret that the bigwigs did not want revealed.  I am certain that a reader will recognize the film and post a link.  But what struck me about the movie is that this futuristic Britain is depicted as being almost entirely white.  All the executives, sitting around their large corporate table, were white.  The poor people on the street were mostly white and the reporters were white.  The villains were white and so were the heroes.  I do not know when the movie was made, but it has been common knowledge for a long time that Britain is rapidly becoming a non-white country.  It is incomprehensible that anybody, in recent years, could imagine such a white Britain thirty years hence.

I was reminded of the movie Idiocracy.  Though it did show many non-whites, a majority of Americans were clearly white – especially the most idiotic of them.  I had viewed the movie with a relative and had commented to him that this is not what America will look like so far in the future.  Not that the movie was meant to be an accurate prediction but, as I’ve noted before, when it comes to race, nothing is by chance in the media.  Everything is carefully calculated.  So, when we see the movie industry showing the public a future that is largely white, we should ask, “why?”

In his book “Systematic Racism:  A History of Oppression“, Joe Feagin writes (pg. 239):

Many white political, economic, religious, and academic leaders, as well as many rank-and-file whites, strongly prefer a future United States that is overwhelmingly white.  This is even the case for the prominent science fiction writers and leading moviemakers who prepare widely circulated books and widely distributed movies for the general public.  In recent research, Victor Romano has analyzed contemporary science fiction movies – such as Gattaca, Minority Report, and A.I. – and found that a racist formula is typically employed in creating these futuristic movies:

“Whites play all major characters (a token black is OK, but no Latinos).  Whites compose the vast majority of the population, despite the fact that they will likely be the minority.  People of  color should not be cast in roles that would have great power.  Interracial dating/marriage has no place.  There is usually some new form of life that is feared or revered.”

In contrast, today some 30 percent of the U.S. population is currently made up of Americans of color, who will likely be the population majority by about the middle of the twenty-first century.  Yet today most white moviemakers seem to be dreaming of a mostly white future.

Feagin’s book was published in 2006 and it is essentially a long diatribe against whites.  But I do believe he is right about one thing: many whites actually do prefer a future United States that is overwhelmingly white.  Many Hispanics would prefer it to be overwhelmingly Hispanic.  But Feagin must be smoking some powerful ganja if he believes that Hollywood elites are pro-white.

In order to understand why the movie industry insists on portraying a white future, let us recall the words of one of their late beloved icons, Robert Kennedy:

First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset …

Kennedy was an evil, cunning man.  He was not a stupid man.  If he did not realize what his immigration bill would do to this country, surely he should have noticed the change after it had already been in process for decades – and yet he never apologized for his above promise, nor did he ever admit he was mistaken.  Kennedy’s promise is Hollywood’s promise.  They are of the same camp and they adhere to the same strategy: deception.

When futuristic movies depict a white future, it is just one more example of the manipulation of the mind of the masses.  A movie is simply another dimension of reality for most people.  Though they will not admit it, their perception of the world is largely shaped by the movies they view.  The higher up decision makers are sending white Americans a message.  The message is, “there is no need for fear.  No need for panic.  Everything will be as it’s always been and your place in the world is assured.  Pay no attention to the xenophobes; they are alarmists…”

But each movie, of this genre, strikes twice.  Firstly, it reassures whites that everything is okay, when it is not.  Secondly, it reaffirms the impression, among non-whites, that they are being left out and discriminated against.  Fools such as Feagin act as cheerleaders for the hostile elite that rules from the shadows.

Another question would be: what role do white fantasy movies (such as The Lord of the Rings) play?  Do they provide a false sense of comfort for whites by allowing them to escape the reality of their dispossession through make-believe worlds or do they inspire whites to alter the reality they live in.  I suppose it depends upon the viewer, but I am inclined to say the former is most common.  Like everything else, it is a numbers game.  The hostile elite do not mind bringing a few to their senses if many more are enthralled by their hypnosis.  We can look at such movies as a form of white-nationalist pornography.  Some may learn to be better lovers, but most will sink into their fantasy land and become irrelevant to the real world (in this arena at least).

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 7 Comments

My email to councilman Cannon of Charlotte

Posted on January 31, 2011 by jewamongyou

Mr. Cannon,
Since when is it a councilman’s/ mayor’s job to prevent the peaceful assembly of citizens?  American Renaissance welcomes people of any race or ethnicity to participate.  The same cannot be said of the Congressional Black Caucus – which you support.  Amren is clearly the more tolerant, and peaceful, of the two and yet you take it upon yourself to use your political clout to oppress Amren and not the CBC.
Mr. Cannon, if you believe the SPLC and their take on Amren, then I’ve got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.  Amren is not a “hate group”, does not condone violence and is not “white supremacist”.  It is certainly not anti-Semitic.  As a leader, it is time you look past skin color and allow people of all races to congregate peacefully.
In the meantime, with or without your blessings, we shall meet in Charlotte.  Your actions, and the actions of the real hate groups, in trying to stifle freedom of speech and assembly, show who the actual oppressors are and who the actual persecuted minorities are.  Hint: you are not a “persecuted minority”.
See you in Charlotte,
jewamongyou

Posted in activism, freedom of speech issues | 10 Comments

"Head Start" founder dies at 95

Posted on January 30, 2011 by jewamongyou

R. Sargent Shriver was one of the founders of the government monstrosity known as “Head Start”.  Its underlying reasoning being that parents cannot (or will not) educate their own children in when they are toddlers, Shriver was proof that years do not necessarily equal wisdom.
A recent Oregonian article eulogized Shriver and bemoaned the likely loss of federal dollars to the Head Start program.

The battle goes on: This week, conservative members of Congress elected on the tea party tide in November pledged to cut the federal budget by $100 million; Democrats say a slice that big could, among other things, knock 350,000 students out of Head Start.

And yet the Oregonian tells us, in no uncertain terms, how the program has become bloated over the years.  Originally, it was “a summer program” and was “started with 200 children”.  Now, it is for the entire school year and involves 822 children with a waiting list of 500 (just in that one school).  All this so that government teachers can teach children to “learn their numbers and colors”.  Wouldn’t it be a lot cheaper to simply let parents do this?  If they are responsible enough to have kids, then they should be responsible enough to teach them.  If they are unwilling to do so, then we have an issue far more serious than a lack of education.
Though the article does not explicitly come out and say so, the two included photos and “Head Start by the numbers” insert make it clear that this is yet another government program that takes money from white people and give it to non-whites.  Two of the three children shown in the photos are black and, in the first one, the black child seems to be the primary subject and is mentioned first by name.  The “numbers” tell us that 35% of the students are Latino and 17.5% are black.  Whites, at 25% are very much underrepresented.  Furthermore, 27% of the staff are parents of former or current students.  So not only is this a government-run babysitting program for non-whites, but it is also a job-creation program for them.  90% of the children get medical/dental care through the program.  In all, it costs $8,689 per child.  “Numbers” does not tell us what percentage of the Latino children are illegal.
In order to qualify for Head Start, “a child must come from a poor home, measured as a family of four making less than $22,000 a year.”  I know plenty of whites who make less than that – but then again, they don’t have four children.  They tend to wait until they are more financially stable and then have children, but that day may never come because so much is taken from them as taxes to pay for programs such as Head Start – which subsidizes those less responsible than they.
Whether or not Head Start has long-term beneficial results is controversial.  But let us assume that its proponents are correct that it does improve cognitive skills through early adulthood and that it does reduce crime.  The program was initiated in 1965.  Do its proponents believe that it should remain in place until the end of time?  How long is long enough?
The Oregonian concludes:

Rhiger summons children to sit around her. “D is the letter of the week, remember?” she asks; the children nod. She holds up a coloring worksheet with pictures of a drum, a duck, a dog, a doll.
“I want you to color all the things on this sheet that begin with D,” Rhiger says. “So, would you color the drum?”
“Yes!” cry out the children.
“But would you color the nnnnnnnnnnnnecklace?”
“No!”
“No, that’s right. Can you tell me why?”
“Because necklace begins with N!” comes the chorus.

The “D” I see here stands for “deceit” – deceit by government.  The “N” stands for “neglect” – neglect by parents, who feel no shame in letting government do the job they should be doing and neglect by having children they should not be having.  As for medical benefits, if they are living in poverty, they qualify for medicare anyway.*
*But I must make the disclaimer here that some people do fall between the cracks and find themselves in tough situations – so it is not my intention to judge them all with the same broad brush.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, libertarian thought | 4 Comments

Southern Sudan

Posted on January 29, 2011 by jewamongyou

These are exciting times for Southern Sudan.  It seems that nearly 99% of the region favors secession from Sudan.  I wish them success and I hope that they manage their affairs wisely.  Still I think it is ironic that it was the United States government that encouraged this development.  The same government that sent hundreds of thousands of its young men to their deaths in order to prevent its own South from seceding.
When we read that 99% of a region is of one mind, and would prefer having its own country, it is difficult to escape the conclusion that the region in question is populated almost entirely of indigenous people.  There are Ethiopians living in the area but their numbers are probably not great enough to make much of a difference for the referendum.
In general, the smaller the area controlled by a government (loosely called a “nation”), the more liberty the people living under it retain.  So secession is usually a good thing.  The peoples of Southern Sudan will probably be more free than they were under Khartoum.  However, many tribes inhabit Southern Sudan, so it remains to be seen how this will play out.  I have a nagging feeling that diversity will not be their strength.
We all stand to gain from a free and prosperous Africa.  The better things are in Africa, the fewer refugees the West will be forced to absorb.  Also, in theory, the more prosperous Africa becomes, the fewer babies Africans will produce.  Everybody will be happier if this comes to pass.

Posted in pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 2 Comments