Islam is a symptom, not the problem

Posted on February 17, 2011 by jewamongyou

A reader sent me this youTube video.
When I watched it, I thought to myself, “this is intriguing and the presenter is well-spoken and seems well-informed.  I wonder how Muslims would respond…”  So I watched this video.
It should be obvious, to any objective viewer, that Muhaddith puts thewhiteroses to shame in the composition, presentation and substance of his rebuttal.  But we should not be surprised; just as a couch potato cannot defeat an Olympic runner in a sprint, so too an outsider cannot prevail in a theological debate with somebody who spends all his days (probably for most of his life) poring over his religious texts.  Of course it is possible that Muhaddith is fabricating everything he says, taking advantage of our ignorance to deceive us – but this is not the impression most people would get from his video.
Look closely at any major religion and you will find numerous sects and denominations.  This is because religion, like politics, can be almost anything its followers choose to make of it.  Of course we can find horrible things in the Quran and the Hadith.  The same is true of the Bible, the Talmud and probably the Vedas.  Those who are inclined to be evil people can find many excuses for their activities within their respective holy books.  Good-hearted people also derive comfort and support from their holy books.  It is the person who makes the person.  Not the book he calls “holy”.
For us to focus on the minutiae and intricacies of any given religion, in a bid to prove that its adherents are evil, is a losing battle.  It is possible that, in an alternate reality, Europeans would rally under the banner of Islam and the brown peoples of the South under the banner of Christianity.  But this is not how history played out.  In our reality, Islam came to represent the Southern peoples and Christianity the Northern peoples (very roughly, of course).  As a result, many customs, mores and attitudes of that Southern region, that may not actually be original components of Islam, have become attached to the people who practice Islam.  For us, it makes little difference if female genital mutilation (FGM) is a “part of Islam” or not.  What matters is that those who practice such abominations are colonizing our native lands.  It also matters that those who call themselves “Muslim” do not take a strong enough stand against such practices, even if most of them do not practice them personally.  Most importantly of all, it matters that our lands are being taken away from us, through massive migration and birth-rate differentials, by alien peoples.
I am fairly certain that, if we asked a member of a conquered people what his main concerns were, the religion of the intruders would not be high on the list.  Though it is true that Islam is an aggressively proselytizing religion (like many Christian sects), the only reason it is gaining a foothold among native Europeans is that the latter have rejected their own spiritual traditions.  Where there used to be native European beliefs or Christianity, there is now a vast void – just waiting to be filled by anybody willing to fill it.  It just so happened that Muslims were geographically convenient for the elites to import and so Islam has taken that role.  Europeans should fight back because Islam represents subjugation of the peoples of the North to the peoples of the South and because it comes with a lot of nasty baggage.  European paganism and Christianity are far from perfect themselves but, if “religion is the opium of the masses” then Europe should partake of its own opium, not somebody else’s.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 12 Comments

Posts now indexed

Posted on February 17, 2011 by jewamongyou

I have finally done what I should have done long ago.  I have gone through the blog and indexed most of the posts according to topic.  Now it should be easier to find past posts.  I realize that the list of categories may not be perfect, and the inclusion of any particular post, into a particular category, may not be perfect, so please feel free to send suggestions.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

German outpost in Brazil

Posted on February 16, 2011 by jewamongyou

The webmaster of Human Stupidity mentioned to me that there is a small region, in Southern Brazil, that was settled by Germans back in the 19th century.  What is remarkable about it, especially the city of Pomerode, is that a majority of the population continues to speak the Pomeranian German of their ancestors.  From the Wikipedia article about it:

Pomerode was founded by PomeranianGermans in 1861 and is considered the “most typically German of all German towns of southern Brazil”.
One very remarkable characteristic about Pomerode is the fact that Pommersch is still being preserved by the majority of the local population.
In Pomerode, as in some other localities in southern Brazil (Santa Maria de Jetibá, Espírito Santo, among them), the German language is not a foreign language, but a Brazilian linguistic regionalism.
For a good part of the 20th century, the Brazilian government did not encourage people to speak the German language. As a matter of fact, at times it was actively repressed and prohibited, like during Getúlio Vargas‘s presidency. Today on the other hand the German language is part of the curriculum in local schools and strongly encouraged by the local governments throughout southern Brazil.

The largest proportions of whites, in Brazil, can be found in the South.  Hence, the standard of living tends to be higher there and crime is lower.  According to Wikipedia, 79% of the South region of Brazil is white.  In Pomerode, the percentage is in the 90’s.  So it is no surprise that blacks and mulattoes trickle in from the North to take advantage of this.  One of the tragedies of the political entity known as the “state” is that it tends to homogenize minority populations within its arbitrary boundaries.  Since the regional population lacks the autonomy to restrict immigration into its own territory by political/military means, it is left to the mercy of economic trends.  The minority population must, in a sense, choose between retaining their own national character by remaining poor and backward (so that few outsiders would want to move there), or improving their standard of living and losing their ethnic/racial identity due to the migration of undesirables.
Though there have been secessionist movements in the South of Brazil, it would seem that the odds of success are slim to none.  The only apparent options available to them, to preserve their own identity into the future, would be continued underground intimidation of intruders or to convince the central government to restrict the movement of people into their region (as the Indian government does with some of its tribal areas).  Realistically, I doubt there is any chance that a Western government would make any sort of accommodation for white groups within its territory.  The exclusion of the Amish from social security taxes was a rare exception and was by virtue of their religion, not their race.
If I were a native of Pomerode, I would start a campaign to inform outsiders that, although their tourist money and visits are welcome, they are not welcome to stay and settle.  Billboards could say, “Welcome to Pomerode!  Enjoy yourself – and then go on home”.  This sort of campaign has been done before – but the details escape me at the moment.

 

Posted in pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 4 Comments

Israelis protesting genocide of Afrikaners

Posted on February 15, 2011 by jewamongyou

Thanks to Charles for sending me the link.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | 19 Comments

Conquering the land

Posted on February 14, 2011 by jewamongyou

There is an ancient Jewish saying, “a woman is merely real-estate” (ha-isha qarqa’ be’alma).  The analogy being that, just like real-estate, a woman can be bought in one of three ways (according to Jewish law).  Also, just like the land, a woman bears fruit several months after being sown.  But there is yet another analogy.  Whenever one people wishes to conquer another people, it does so through the women of the subject people just as it does so by seizing its lands.
A commentator, called Gerry, linked to an article, in his comment on my post about Hoosier Nation, that discusses the ongoing problem of Jewish women marrying non-Jews in Israel – specifically Muslims.  The relationship between Muslim men and Jewish women in Israel is very much like that of black men and white women in the U.S.  In both cases, the men view the women of the subject people as both trophies and a means of “getting back” at their supposed oppressors.  To the extent that love is involved, it is a love born of hate.  Israeli Muslims hate Jews, so they seek out the soft underbelly of the Jewish people, its women, as targets.  Black men hate whites, so they seek out the soft underbelly of white people, its women, as targets.  Sometimes this takes the form of rape, other times it takes the form of dating and romance – but the goal is the same: a feather in the hat of the man and a blow against his enemy.
It is no accident that the vast majority of Muslim/Jewish couples involve a male Muslim and a Jewess, just as it is no accident that the vast majority of black/white couples involve a black male and a white female.  In both cases, the male is using “love” as a weapon against the target population.  In both cases, women of the target population perceive such men as being more “masculine” because of their raw crudeness and vulgarity.  There is a certain type of woman that is attracted to this.
The cited article reads in part:

Marriages between Jewish women and Arab men took center stage at a meeting of the Knesset Committee for the Advancement of Women this week, when committee chairwoman Tzipi Hotovely (Likud) hosted a hearing on the subject in honor of Jewish Identity Day in the Knesset…
“We must confront the fact that the country has not valued education, which is the only way to prevent Jewish women from forging life connections with non-Jews,” Hotovely said.
“The struggle against assimilation only reaches headlines through stories about Jewish women marrying Muslim men, but it is important to remember that the phenomenon is much wider – 92,000 mixed families live in the State of Israel. There is a need to create a curriculum for girls in high schools that deals with Jewish identity. The fact that girls reach a state of intermarriage testifies to the fact that the education system was absent.”

As a Jew, I am encouraged that public officials in Israel take this matter seriously.  On the other hand – where is the outcry, in the U.S., against the targeting of white women?

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, miscegenation | 17 Comments

Hoosier Nation

Posted on February 12, 2011 by jewamongyou

Until a few days ago, I had never heard the term “Hoosier”.  Thanks to Matt Parrott, I am now not only familiar with the term, but I even have a historical grasp of its origins and its current meaning.  In fact, after reading his book, “Hoosier Nation”, I almost wished I was a Hoosier myself.  Parrot paints a loving portrait of his people in this book and, at the same time, encourages Hoosiers to embrace what they have left of their long-suffering, and battered, identity.
As I read the book, I found myself nodding in agreement time and time again.  Confronted with the wisdom within its pages, I found it hard to believe that the author is barely 30 years old!  For example:

… we have to lead the way. setting  an example for other Americans to emulate in embracing their own heritage.  We have to stop and reflect on our Hoosier identities, celebrating what we retain of our heritage and reviving what we’ve lost.  If you pronounce “wash” as “worsh”, continue to do so.  Embrace your Hoosier twang and resist the popular culture which equates our accent with inferiority…

Regular readers of this blog already know how I treasure linguistic distinctiveness.  Retaining our own flavors of English (or whatever language) is not simply a symbolic statement of ethnic identity, but an affirmation of it with every word we utter.  Parrott has taken a group of Americans, that is too often assumed to be without any real ethnic identity, and given them an identity – or rather, given them back their identity.  Part of me wants to say that any true American is, at least partly, a Hoosier – but I won’t.  Only a Hoosier can be a Hoosier, but to a certain degree, traditional America is an extension of the Hoosier nation.
Visit Parrott’s webpage/ radio station here.  The entire text of the book is available here.

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links | 6 Comments

Give Jared Taylor and Amren another chance

Posted on February 11, 2011 by jewamongyou

Some people have been saying that two screw-ups in a row is too much.  After reading those comments, I have wondered about other public people.  Let’s take a look at Jesse Jackson.  He calls himself “reverend”, which supposedly means he is a “man of God”.  Yet he cheated on his wife and had a child out of wedlock.  What was the reaction of black Americans?  They overwhelmingly forgave him for his gross indiscretions.  Jesse Jackson does not champion a worthy cause.  He probably does not have a moral bone in his body and makes his living through extortion.  Now let us take a look at Jared Taylor.  His public conduct has been nothing less than exemplary and his cause is a worthy one.  He has worked tirelessly, and fearlessly, so that our children and grandchildren might have a brighter future.  He has been hounded by thugs and regularly insulted both by Jews and anti-Semites.  He has harnessed his intellect and eloquence for a largely thankless cause.  So certainly we can show at least as much patience with him as blacks show toward Jackson.
Who, among us, has invested even a small fraction of what Taylor has invested for the sake of our movement?  So two conferences in a row were  cancelled.  This is unfortunate – but they do not negate decades of selfless service.  Jared Taylor is not the CEO of a company, who has failed his stockholders.  He is not a politician who has reneged on his campaign promises.  He is a private individual who was trying to do the right thing and is “flaw” was that his moral standards were superior to those of his foes.  His foes used this against him.  I am certain that nobody is as distressed, by this whole affair, as he.  After all the years he has put in on our behalf, we should consider him family and treat him as such.  This much he has earned.
As for me, I have decided that if there is another American Renaissance conference, I shall attend if at all possible.  I only ask that it be held in a location that is immune from the dirty tricks of the past.

Posted in activism | 13 Comments

The pro-white movement needs diversity

Posted on February 10, 2011 by jewamongyou

Organizations such as the SPLC and ADL often accuse pro-white organizations of harboring openly hateful people, anti-Semites and lunatics.  Unfortunately, this often turns out to be true.  If a pro-white person, of healthy demeanor, wishes to join other pro-whites as an organization, he will discover that neo-Nazis* are also pro-white and also wish to attach themselves to these organizations.
What is one to do when he is privy to important truths – but the vast majority of other people who recognize those truths are social pariahs?  Should he avoid all contact with any of them?  If he takes this path, then he will be lonely indeed.  He will find himself on a small rowboat in rough seas with no land in sight and all other boats and ships inhabited by the enemy.  He will find that his avoidance of them will  do him little good; he will still be considered an extremist and lumped in with the rest.  If he chooses to avail himself of the networks built by those pariahs, then he will be lumped together with them in the eyes of the rest of humanity and his associations with them will be brought up over and over again as proof of his hate and ignorance.
Being pro-white is an unpopular position to take and, the way things are going, it will remain so for quite some time.  But it is wrong to give up.  To continue the fight, we need organizations to represent us and those organizations need to represent a wide range of attitudes.  Some need to be geared toward suit-and-tie intellectuals while others need to be geared toward thuggish intimidation – depending on what is necessary at the time.  A suit-and-tie intellectual is not very useful to whites who need physical protection from non-white thugs who are out to get him; the law is of little use in such cases.  Send a group of tough street fighters and the situation might be diffused as the aggressors realize they picked the wrong fight.  But it would not be appropriate to send the same street fighters, dressed to intimidate, to a public protest or to an interview with the media.  Some organizations are more orientated toward racial science, while others would focus more on social issues.
An organizations might blend various approaches into one.  But there is one attitude that some pro-white organizations should take care to be clean of: hatred toward people based entirely on what they were born as.  It is one thing to have a distaste for blacks in general, but quite another to declare that one hates all blacks.  Many, in the pro-white movement, hate Jews – some hate all Jews, regardless of affiliation.  There is a reason the wider public disdains such hatred: it is stupid and wrong. By planting themselves in practically all pro-white organizations, these haters succeed in giving anti-white hate groups such as the SPLC ammunition to paint all pro-whites with the same brush.  Thus, in a sense, there is not enough diversity in the pro-white movement.
What we need is an organization that promotes the interests of whites and has no connection, whatsoever, to neo-Nazi groups, the KKK or any other group that is associated with hate (even if that association, in the eyes of the public, is based on ignorance).  Such a clean organization can then publicly boast that it opposes racial/ethnic hatred and that it is a strictly positive organization.  Of course, it would still be accused of being “racist” but it would be a lot easier for this organization to win converts.  The leaders of this organization would be very careful who they let in; anybody with past connections to “hateful groups” (I wish I had a better term) would have to go through a cleansing process of some sort and make public pronouncements that his motivation is to help people.  Not to hurt them.  There would be actual membership and dues would be paid.  There have been some organizations that approximate what I am talking about – such as the EAIF, which unfortunately does not appear to have much recent activity.
Of course, for those pro-whites who disagree with the above conditions and philosophy, there are plenty of other groups they can join.  While in Charlotte, some of us discussed founding such a group but, for the moment, it is only an idea.  We have a name and, possibly, even a logo – but I shall not divulge any of this yet.
*There is always a problem with labels.  When I say “neo-Nazi”, I mean somebody who hates all Jews and is not averse to violence.  I fully realize that there might be some who call themselves “neo-Nazis” who do not fit this description and there might be others who do, but call themselves something else.

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 30 Comments

"South Africa Sucks" blog taken down

Posted on February 9, 2011 by jewamongyou

A couple of days ago, the “South Africa Sucks” blog was removed by WordPress – that same WordPress I praised a while back for its tolerance.  South Africa Sucks is one of the more vulgar race-realist blogs.  It does not shy away from foul language, adult graphics or colorful epithets.  Normally, I avoid such blogs and they do not appear on my blogroll.  But, considering the horrendous state of affairs in South Africa, I made allowance for all this for the above blog.  It is easy for people like me, sitting in lily white Oregon, to maintain my composure.  But a different set of standards applies when the enemy is at the gates – or at your door.
It seems WordPress received some complaints and they did not make the distinction described above.  Many would say that I should not make such a distinction either. After all, we certainly suffer enough outrages here in America to justify dropping any composure and declaring outright war.  For example, this case I just read about at Amren.  I would not shed any tears if that murderer were to be lynched.  Justice is justice.  Perhaps our composure is a weakness.  On an almost regular basis, hordes of blacks terrorize whites in their schools, streets and malls.  Those blacks have no composure.  This lack of composure is interpreted as rage and, when people see rage, they assume it must be justified somehow.
Personally, I cannot help myself; I am a very composed person.  Anger does not come easily to me.  But I find it hard to believe that tens of millions of white Americans are just like me in this regard.  It seems far-fetched that rage is such a dear commodity among those who need it most.  I have read stories about the non-Jews of certain lands.  How they used to get drunk on Easter after their preachers told them how the Jews had murdered their savior.  Then they would rampage through the Jewish ghettos, shedding much blood in the process.
I don’t know exactly what it was that the gentile peasants of yore used to drink to arouse their rage, but whatever it is, we need it now.  The drinks are on jewamongyou! Just put it on my tab.

Posted in freedom of speech issues, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 11 Comments

Posting Guidelines for Anti-White Discrimination; First-Person Accounts

Posted on February 9, 2011 by jewamongyou

Please follow these guidelines, as I will remove posts that don’t pass muster:

  1. The accounts must be SPECIFIC. Don’t just write “They were mean to me, “ “They didn’t treat me fairly,” or “It was a bad experience.” Instead, be specific. What, exactly, did they do to you, and how, exactly, were you NOT treated fairly.
  2. Mind your grammar and spelling. Yes, it’s true that many of the accounts contain excessive errors – but this is AFTER THE FACT, because I try to be faithful to the original. It’s better if the original is written well. So, after you’ve written your account, go back and reread it, fixing errors.
  3. If you’re willing to spend the time finding other people’s first-person accounts online, then I thank you for that. If the source is something like The Daily Stormer, then let me know, and I’ll post it first to my blog (Jewamongyou), edit it for BNBR, and then you can use that link as a source.
  4. All submissions must have sources, and if it’s something that happened to you personally, or that was told you by a friend, then make note of it, and that’s the source.
  5. If the story you’re posting has already been posted, I’ll remove it for redundancy. No hard feelings.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment