One Sheaf, One Vine

I just got finished reading One Sheaf, One Vine by Robert Griffin.  I think it is very well written and I enjoyed it very much.  Thanks to Gaurav Ahuja for sending me the link.
As I sat reading this work, I thought to myself how there might be a possibility of getting some of my own leftist family members to read it.  After all, it is entertaining and easy to understand.  The style draws you in much like a novel and the reader, in most cases, can easily identify with the subjects.  I thought to myself how this work can do so much to drive home the fact that white nationalists are real people with the same ambitions, fears and hurdles as the rest of Western society.
Any thoughts of asking family members to read it faded away, however, when I saw that from the middle of the book onward, the evils of “the Jews” took a more and more prominent role.  I realized that any Jew, who is not already familiar with the basics of white nationalism, would quickly be turned off by such writings.  He would say to himself, “It looks like what I’ve been told is true.  Those racist whites really do hate us and they must be out to get us too!”  From that point on, it would be highly unlikely that such a Jew would discover, and embrace, racial truths.  The well has been poisoned for him.
Far be it from me to deny that there is a Jewish problem and I’ve already written that we Jews must take responsibility for our role in destructive movements and for our adversarial attitude toward the West – and I speak in general terms here.  But this does not mean that there is no hope for bringing some Jews to the truth – and we really should have tools to help facilitate this.  All too often I think I’ve found something that might be useful only to discover that it cannot be used because, somewhere in the middle typically, it starts blaming “the Jews”.  When trying to convert people to the Truth, it is not helpful to imply that they are innately evil and the source of everything rotten that has happened to Western man.  I’m certain that missionaries, in the dark of Africa, don’t go around trying to convert the local blacks by making them feel like the dregs of humanity.
So what we have here is a vicious cycle.  Jews started it to be sure – but right now we should be asking ourselves how we can end it.  Evil Jews, such as the ones involved with the SPLC, contribute mightily to anti-Semitism by behaving just as so many white nationalists insist Jews behave.  Then those white nationalists write about it in their articles and books.  Then ordinary Jews are confronted with literature that is full of accusations against Jews and those ordinary Jews see this as proof that the SPLC is right, that there is a lot of hatred in the world toward Jews and we must be vigilant and look out for ourselves.  So, said Jews take out their checkbooks and send the SPLC more money and so it goes (white nationalist authors unwittingly contributing to the SPLC racket)…
Somebody needs to be mature enough to openly recognize what is going on here and try to put an end to it.  Jews are not a monolithic entity; we do not have a single leader who can speak for all of us.  Of course the same is true of white nationalists.  But there are some, in the white nationalist movement, who are influential enough that if they held out an olive branch to honorable Jews, it might mean something.  It would not have to be much.  Just an acknowledgment that there are some good Jews and to mention this more often as they bash Jews in general.  Likewise, it would be immensely beneficial if some influential Jewish leaders came out publicly and stated that they understand the concerns of white nationalists.  That their protests are not without merit.  I do not have much hope that this will happen because I think honesty is more common among white nationalist leaders (my recent post not withstanding) than it is among Jewish leaders.
Reading through One Sheaf, One Vine, I could not help but notice how many whites came to their senses through books and organizations that have a definite anti-Jewish slant to them.  As for me, I wonder if those same books and organizations would have helped me along or if they might have scared me off.  At this point, I am strong enough in my convictions that they do not bother me but this sort of conviction and maturity takes time.  Just as we educate a child with baby steps, so too we often must educate brainwashed adults with baby steps.  In our society, blaming Jews for a multitude of ills that plague us is not usually an effective approach – especially if it is a Jew you are trying to educate.
The facts of the Jewish undermining of Western civilization need to be presented.  People should know about these things, but we need to have our primers, our intermediate material and then our advanced material.  Throwing advanced material at a layman will probably only serve to alienate him.

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links | 20 Comments

Shop right – buy white

The hostile elite leaves no stones unturned in order to impose racial diversity upon once white societies.  Their choices of models on product packaging is one measure of manufacturer’s “commitment to diversity”.  The fact that most American products still depict white models is encouraging and shows that those in charge of marketing recognize that eliminating whites altogether from their packaging would alienate too many customers.  In other words, many whites still possess some sort of racial awareness even if it is only at a subconscious level.  Otherwise, we would probably see no white faces on product packaging; they would all be “people of color”.
When we are shopping for breakfast cereal and come upon a choice such as this:

… which product should we purchase?  The correct answer is, of course, the one on the right.  When we are shopping for diapers and encounter the following choice:

… which one should we purchase?  That’s correct!  The one on the right.  We can rest assured that many blacks would, in both cases, pick the products on the left because they identify with their own race.
Race-conscious shopping is not a sign of hatred toward other races.  It is a way each of us can rebel against the forces of evil, which are plotting extermination against whites.  So we are not showing disdain for blacks but rather for the powers that be and their agenda.  A black might say it is our way of “stickin’ it to the MAN”.
So, next time you’re out shopping, don’t just look for the best deal.  Look for ways to shop white and “stick it to the MAN”.

Posted in activism | 9 Comments

A black blogger moans about AIDS…

Rev. Dr. Renita J. Weems moans and groans about the high incidence of AIDS and other STD’s among blacks:

I have started and stopped and started rewriting this blogpiece 10 times already. I can’t seem to find my footing into this topic. The numbers are staggering.
One of every four teenage girls between 14-19 years old has been infected with a sexually transmitted disease.
Now take a look at the figures for black girls.
Forty-eight percent (48%) of African American teen girls between 14-19 years old has had at least one sexually transmitted disease.
What are we to think? How are we supposed to interpret this data?
Are we to believe that black girls have more sex, more teen pregnancies, and more STD’s than any other population?
Now they are telling us that African Americans who make up only 13% of the population comprise half of the population living with HIV/AIDS in this country with African American, and that our teens are becoming the fastest growing poupulation contracting the disease. What are we supposed to think? That we have a bunch of diseased-ridden young sluts and studs that we call our children?

Actually yes, Rev. Weems, many of your children are disease-ridden young sluts and studs.  Rev. Weems’ blog post contains a wealth of lamenting and emotion but not a single explanation as to why blacks are so much more prone to STD’s than other races.
Wanting to be helpful, I sent Rev. Weems an email:

I just read your piece on HIV/AIDS in your blog and I wanted to tell you that I believe interracial relationships have a lot to do with the prevalence of AIDS among blacks in America.
With so many non-black women actively seeking out black men for dating, the status of black men has been artificially inflated.  It is very easy for a black man to find women – of any color.  What this might mean for black women is that they feel they must make more concessions in order to gain favor in the eyes of black men.  This means having sex more readily and foregoing protection.
I’m interested in your opinion on what I just wrote and, if you agree, what possible solutions you might suggest.  Should black women be more willing to date men of other races?  Should black men be expected to date within their own race?  Should black women try, in other ways, to make themselves more attractive to black men?  Should we hold the media responsible for pushing the black man/white woman model so aggressively?

So far, it has been about a week since I sent the email and still no response.  Perhaps she finds my suggestion distasteful but, if she is truly sincere in her concerns, she should be seeking the truth, pleasant or not.
The explanation I suggested above would apply even if there were no genetic differences between the races.  In fact, there is much evidence that blacks are hard-wired to be more promiscuous and to have a higher time-preference.  Prof. Philippe Rushton built a solid case for this in his excellent book “Race, Evolution and Behavior”.  How many blacks would ever consider such a possibility?  Very few; most would feel deeply offended by such a suggestion.
I recently found out that the newest member of my (extended) family is going to be born with Spina Bifida.  People with this condition commonly have low/average I.Q.’s and often suffer from learning disabilities.  There are, of course, also a host of physical symptoms including a strong likelihood of latex allergy.  Nobody in my family – or among the medical profession – has suggested that it would be a good idea to hide these propensities from mother or child.  As far as I can tell, nobody is concerned that somebody might become offended if such risks are brought up.  On the contrary, the mother has every intention of keeping latex out of her home and she is fully prepared to take advantage of special programs for the learning disabled.
In the same way, black communities have a right to know their limitations and proclivities.  Black communities should take them into consideration and have a penal system geared to them.  I do not blame blacks for the fact that they will not accept the reality of racial differences.  Instead I blame whites for this.  It is the responsibility of whites to stop worrying about offending blacks and to allow the truth to be discussed openly and to become known.  Only then can people like Rev. Weems cease their whining and actually take meaningful steps to combat the spread of STD’s among their youth.

Posted in examples of propaganda, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 9 Comments

USA Today – Afrocentric as ever


Apparently, according to USA Today, once all top spots are held by blacks, peace and tranquility will finally be our lot.  In the meantime, USA Today is doing its part to guarantee that as many top media spots as possible go to blacks.  Are Uzbeks white?  They look white in the above photo – and they’re crying because of ethnic strife.  The white woman is hugging her black politician hero, while the white man to the left is (thankfully in this case) dead.  I’m not sure about the two individuals on the upper right; that image is covered by an advertiser’s sticker.

Posted in examples of propaganda | 10 Comments

The David Duke paradox

David Duke wrote “My Awakening” and this book has made a huge difference in the lives of many people – a positive difference.  He also publicly promotes the group rights of whites and this is commendable.  Furthermore, at least one of his daughters follows in his racialist footsteps and honors him greatly.  I think this is a beautiful thing.
On the flip side, Duke is alleged to have engaged in questionable behavior and I am in no position to judge whether he did these deeds or not.  Some of my friends, themselves race-realists, think the man is an abomination.  Perhaps – and perhaps the white nationalist movements, varied as they are, should pick their spokesmen more carefully.
The white nationalist movements are, unfortunately, plagued by men of dubious character: Nick Griffin, David Lane, Robert Matthews and Harold Covington for example.  But to those who are quick to judge white nationalism on this basis, I would ask: are “mainstream” politicians any better?  If anything, I would say they are far worse.  Also, in a sense, white nationalism is de facto illegal.  This makes it much like alcohol during prohibition; just as it was mainly criminal types who were attracted to commerce in illegal alcohol, so too it is mainly criminal types who are attracted to leadership in white nationalism.  Once white nationalism becomes permissible for public discourse, its leaders will tend to be more savory.  Furthermore, black nationalist leaders and Jewish nationalist leaders are far from perfect and yet the media is quite forgiving toward them.
I think mature people need to get in the habit of separating the man from the message.  Not that we should lower ourselves to the level of other races, who have no moral standards for their leaders.  But if we demand that our leaders be flawless, who then shall we look up to?  As much as I admire Jared Taylor, I am certain that he is not without sin.
In conclusion, if I felt that the book “My Awakening” could help somebody reach the truth and awaken him from his slumber, I would not hesitate to lend the book to him.  At the same time, I might include a disclaimer about its author.  We need every effective tool we can get our hands on for our intellectual arsenal.   “My Awakening” might be an effective tool.  I’ve read that John Browne gives away free copies of it.  That is a great deal.  As a Jew, I find it difficult to pass up a good deal so I might just take him up on it.

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 27 Comments

Kudos to Hunter Wallace!

Hunter Wallace, of Occidental Dissent, entered a nest of loony leftists in order to challenge them face to face.  He recorded this adventure on camera.  It takes a lot of courage to speak the truth publicly these days and his actions should encourage the rest of us to do likewise.  So hopefully y’all will see me doing the same some day in my own area.  To Hunter I say, “keep up the good work!  I’m proud to count you as a friend.”

Posted in activism | 3 Comments

On tax revolts

It is prudent these days to be afraid of the I.R.S.  This so-called “service” ruins many lives daily with the stroke of a pen or keyboard.    This is one reason any online talk of “tax revolt” or “cheating on one’s taxes” is typically prefaced with the disclaimer “we are not advocating the breaking of any laws…”.
Nevertheless I’ll go ahead and say what millions of Americans have been thinking for years: the government steals vast amounts of our money and then uses it to oppress us.  It spends “our” money on elaborate (and usually misguided) foreign aid projects, it supports anti-white racist organizations such as La Raza, it passes and enforces a multitude of blatantly unconstitutional laws using “our” money and it pays armies of government bureaucrats large salaries in order to make our lives miserable.  Why should we go on supporting them?  Did not America’s founding fathers sacrifice their lives over far less?
I believe that millions of Americans privately wage their own tax revolts through imaginative deductions, unreported income and under the table employees.  As a matter of fact, even those who create the tax laws have been found to take such liberties.
Any individual who agitates for tax revolt makes himself a target for severe oppression.  In the “War on Some Drugs”, only those who do not use drugs are considered credible spokesmen to end it.  This is why we so often hear “I don’t use drugs myself but…”.  But what is effective in the “War on Some Drugs” is not effective in the “War on our Money”.
There are many good reasons for people to refrain from using recreational drugs but there is only one good reason for people to pay all their taxes by the book: fear.   Let us not forget that even those who have every intention of paying their “fair share” of taxes cannot be certain they have done so; the rules are simply too complex.  Therefore, those who can honestly say “I have paid all of the taxes required of me by law going back many years but…” are very few.
We live in a society where it can be assumed that virtually all of us are “criminals” because we cannot comprehend the tax laws and because there are so many of them.  This leaves every one of us vulnerable, and therefore, afraid to speak up against the massive theft of our money.
At this point we can only hope that the Leviathan will collapse in on itself from its own weight speedily and in our lifetimes.  Perhaps, from the ensuing chaos, liberty will emerge.

Posted in libertarian thought | 1 Comment

Jews and books

It is Spring and I should be out frolicking in the Sun enjoying the great outdoors.  Alas, the Portland area has endured so many overcast and rainy days this year that even the albinos are getting Rickets.  So here I am writing this blog…
But enough small talk.  I’m here today to write about books.  In the old days, a lot of hard work used to go into the production of books.  Even well after the invention of movable type, manuscripts remained the norm in some parts of the world.
I have a volume (Midrash haGadol – a commentary on the Torah) that was written in Yemen some 500-600 years ago.  Here is an example of this original archaic script:
Over years of use, much of the volume became unusable or lost.  Instead of throwing it away, a scribe simply re-wrote what was missing and bound it together with the original.  This was around 300 years ago and here’s a close-up of one of his pages:
Time marched on and the book continued to be used.  Another section became unusable and, instead of throwing it away, a scribe chose to replace the defective/lost section with his own work.  This was about 150 years ago and here is an example of his work:
At a later date, the first few pages of the volume got lost or damaged.  Instead of throwing it away, a scribe chose to replace those pages with his own.  This was about 100 years ago and here is a close-up of his handiwork:
The volume, as it exists today, is complete.  Not a single page is missing.  The only place we find a date, however, is at the very end:
Here is a translation of the last three lines:

The scribe Shalom ben Aharon (?)… Let Him forgive me for all mistakes and errors that are hidden from my eyes and anybody who finds an error, let him judge me favorably as King David said “errors who can understand”.   This was completed in the month of Siwan 18.  It was written in the name of the good scholar Si’id Saalim, may the Holy One blessed be He merit him to read from it, he and his children and his children’s children (?) Amen.  Year: 2157.

The year, as was the custom in Yemen, is reckoned from the reign of Alexander the Great.  This calendar is called “Shetaroth“.  It translates into the year 1846.
Another such example, in my collection, is a philosophical work (called Ruah Hen) printed in Yesnitz, 1744:
It was missing the last few pages – which were meticulously filled in by a Sephardic scribe.  At first he used block print:
… but then reverted to the cursive he was probably more accustomed to:
IMG_2498This type of Sephardic cursive script is now almost extinct, having been replaced by Ashkenazic cursive.  In fact, most Sephardic Jews (at least the younger ones) are ignorant of the fact that their forefathers had their own script.  What is now known as “Rashi” script (used almost exclusively in religious texts) is an offshoot of Sephardic cursive.  Few can even read Sephardic cursive these days; as for me, I can read it with difficulty.
The owners of those books were probably dismayed that sections were missing.  As for me, I am happy this was the case – because their efforts made those books all the more interesting.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | 4 Comments

What is a "traitor"?

Dictionary.com defines “traitor” as:

1. a person who betrays another, a cause, or any trust.
2. a person who commits treason by betraying his or her country.
Since the first definition is so general, I’ll focus on the second here.  Most definitions of “country” revolve around a territorial or political entity.  In fact, in recent times, where the word “traitor” is used (in the legal sense), it refers to one who has taken the side of  a country other than the one he was born in (or is a citizen of).
Most modern wars are fought over issues.  The issues may involve disputed territory, alleged aggression, trade disputes or human rights.  Within such a context, it seems odd to me that a person would be condemned simply for choosing the side he considers right.  For example, if Hamas is considered the enemy of Israel and a citizen of Israel chooses to take the side of Hamas in this conflict because he considers it to be the more just cause, the State of Israel might consider him to be a traitor.  If an Arab from Gaza chooses the Israeli side, he would be considered a traitor.  Since both sides are not generally both right, it stands to reason that honest people would often side with the nation that is at war with the one they were born into (or are citizens of).  In other words, being a traitor is often the right thing to do.
When it comes to ethnic/racial loyalties, however, rivalry is not usually over issues.  Instead, it is over genetic and cultural interests.  In this case, both sides are usually right.  It is right for a Jew to work for the benefit of his people and, at the same time, it is right for an Arab to work for the benefit of his people.  Where those interests conflict, it is always the responsibility of Jews to do what is right for Jews and for Arabs to do what is right for Arabs – and I am not speaking of violence or aggression here.
What a bizarre world we live in, at least in America, where treason against the State is taken more seriously than treason against one’s race or ethnicity!  After all, the State is usually wrong.  It has no morals, honor, or discipline; there is no reason at all for us to be loyal to it.  In contrast, our race/ethnicity is the very essence of our being.  As such, it transcends any need to be right or moral or disciplined.  Every species on Earth looks out for its own and strives to multiply – even the lowliest, most disgusting insect is loyal to its genes.  The same is true of every sub-species.  Otherwise they would have ceased to exist long ago.
From this objective angle, we should appreciate that a traitor to the State is probably to be commended; he is standing up for his beliefs.  But a traitor to his race/ethnicity is more contemptible than the lowliest slug or house fly; he has forfeited his own blood and surrendered to his basest selfishness.
Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 4 Comments

Black acheivements

A website that lists black inventors tells us that Janet Emerson Bashen became the first African American to win a patent for a “software invention” on January, 2006.  This story illustrates how desperate some blacks are to inflate the accomplishments of their people.  In this case, I think they should have remained silent.  According to Wikipedia, the first software patent was granted back in 1966.  This means that forty years had gone by without a single black software patent holder!  And then, when one finally materialized – she turned out to be not much darker than me.  In other words, she is probably of mixed heritage.
Much has already been written* about the bogus lists of “black accomplishments”, especially when it comes to inventions and intellectual prowess.  Traditionally, Western society has valued education and education usually means intelligence.  This is why, amongst Occidentals at least, it is considered an insult to imply that another person lacks mental fortitude but it is not so insulting to imply that a person does not dance well.  This is why, when we state that blacks are, on average, less intelligent than other races, the assumption is that this means blacks are less human than the rest of us.  This is why blacks, and the leftists who so adore them, try so hard to believe that all races are equal when it comes to intelligence.
As a matter of fact, the decline of Western civilization has clearly been accompanied by a similar decline in emphasis on intellectual pursuits (except for practical ends).  When we compare the popularity of sports heroes with that of prominent scientists, the former win by a large margin.  How many young people have you recently seen wearing Stephen Hawking t-shirts?  I find it hard to believe that precisely those endeavors that feature the largest proportion of blacks also happen to be the most popular.  Sports and entertainment are the only activities where blacks regularly excel.  Politics, being a numbers game, should not count.
The leftist elite, having shifted society’s central organs downward, still continue to lay claim to the brain.  In other words, it is not enough for them that the proletariat look up to black heroes; they must also maintain the illusion that even the intellectual elite are “people of color”.  At the same time, there are those who openly challenge traditional cerebral-centrism.  For example, the theory of multiple intelligences. Two of the “intelligences” listed by Howard Gardner, in his book Multiple Intelligences are kinesthetic and musical.  Having read the book a while back, I was struck by the emphasis Gardner places on other cultures.  If  “African American” culture is distinct enough that their conception of intelligence differs from that of white America, then surely the disparities between the races in pivotal areas of modern life can be attributed to culture – without resorting to “white racism”.  But somehow this possibility never seems to be mentioned in public discourse.  I wonder about Gardner’s motivation.  Was he trying to enhance our understanding of intelligence through the study of non-white cultures or was he trying to elevate those same non-white peoples by redefining “intelligence” for their benefit?
I cannot help but wonder if the deposing of intellectualism, for the benefit of lower I.Q. groups, is the beginning of our descent into savagery.  A visit to one of the more “diverse” locations in America would do much to dispel any doubt.
* When you type the words “black inventions” into Google, the first result that comes up is the “black invention myths” site.  This is true as of June 6th, 2010.  I expect Google to change this when it is brought to their attention.

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 3 Comments