Sam Dickson's Amren speech

A friend convinced me to upload my videos of Sam Dickson’s speech even though I was only able to record part of it.  Half a speech is better than none and I’m sure many of you will enjoy it.  He is truly a great speaker – and very intelligent!
Sam Dickson’s half speech

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

On Eagle's Talons

I have, in my possession, a book called “On Eagle’s Talons”.  It tells the tale of child kidnappings, deceit, theft, cultural genocide and murder of Yemeni Jews by the secular Zionist establishment.  Following is an excerpt (my translation):

On Eagle’s Talons

The Entire Truth About Operation Flying Carpet

INTRODUCTION

Many of those who read this book, when they raise their heads for a short break between one chapter and the next – will ask themselves, in their bewilderment: “Did these things really happen?”  “Could such a crime truly have happened amongst the People of Israel?” and if this really is the case – then it requires a thorough house cleaning and perhaps even a change of values.
Then let me add this: “Indeed this horrible deed was done in Israel”… and much more than what is written here… for it is impossible to find all the material that has been written and printed, the archives and stories about this matter – for it is vast.
Here we have an attempt to present the material in a concise way, partly as a personal story and partly as documentation of events and an outline from the sources.
I strove to cite a source for each claim, so that each reader will be able to clarify, for himself, the details from the sources but even where a source is not cited the narration is still accurate.  I didn’t want to add too many footnotes unnecessarily since the goal of this book is to be read and not as a scholarly source that would be limited academics.

Chapter One

Where is Yosele?

New and instructive details about the disappearances of the children of Yemen

The strategy:
The Bahajli family, from Rosh ha’Ayin, arrived at the transit camp in 1949.  The father relates that, when they got to the camp, his four month old son was taken from him and transferred to the “infant ward” that had been erected in the camp: “One day we came to see him, and we were told that he was at the hospital.  We searched in all the hospitals, but the child was not found…”.  After some time had elapsed, the management of the camp requested the infant’s rations coupon (at that time, food was distributed according to coupons).  The family turned to the officer of internal affairs and to the national president but they were not answered.
(“Al haMishmar” 07/08/1966)
The Marhabi family relates: “We arrived at Camp ‘Ayn Shomer.  It was midnight.  We carried with us a few packages that we’d brought from Yemen, and I held my one year old baby, Shoshana.  They registered us and we went to the tent.  After an hour the nurse came by and told us to give her the baby because it’s forbidden to hold babies in the tent”.  The mother went to nurse her daughter in the infant ward until one day the nurse told her: “Ma’am, your daughter has died”.  To her question: “How and why and what about the funeral?” the nurse replied: “I don’t know; it’s not my job to deal with dead children…”
(letter from Ginzekha haMedina 12/19/1950)

One thread leads to – the health department

In “Al haShomer”, a periodical of Mapam (the Israeli Communist party), which was active with new immigrants, we found a shocking opinion from a writer who had a conscience:
Under the heading: “What is the truth regarding medical treatment for the children of the camps (10/05/1949), writes Yirmiyahu  Shmueli, about the lax medical treatment that was given to children of the camps and to immigrants in general.  He notes that in many cases children died as a result of gross neglect on the part of medical teams and/or mistakes in treatment.  The accusations were so severe that the writer demanded the formation of an investigative committee to investigate the crimes.
The director general of the Health Department – Dr. Y. Meir – who was concerned about the ramifications of this letter, invited the writer in order to “investigate the accusations” (or really to explain the severity of the damage that the publicity caused, or is likely to cause…).  The director of the Health Department at that time, Hayim Moshe Shapira, was apprised of the problem but still supported his people.
In “Ginzekha haMedina” is preserved a letter by the “Unified Confederation of Yemenite Immigrants”, regarding the disappearance of children from hospitals.  The letter was presented to the police commissioner, Bechor Shitreet and to the director of the Health Department.  In one case the police “investigated” even then, the complaint of Yihye Suberi about the disappearance of his son.  In another instance the newspaper “Davar” published an article (19/29/1950) under the headline “Where are the Babies?”  In this article is told the story of a baby by the name of Mosha ban Salim Najar, who was brought to the hospital in Tel-Levinsky (Tel haShomer), and when he recovered – he suddenly disappeared.
The director general of the police at the time, Y. Sahar, appealed to the director of the Health Department with this letter and proclaimed that the police report reveals a serious blight among hospital officials in the transit camps – a situation that requires  fixing.
(letter from 11/03/1950)
Maghuri Cohen, a member of the Knesset of the “Herut” party, who is also the son of Yemeni immigrants, brought this up at the Knesset on 11/20/1950 and claimed: “Children were taken from their parents and the parents don’t know where to!”…  He also asked: “Is this some kind of business or parcel packages!?”  He complained about the director of the Health Department, who ignored his letters and requests on the matter, and the director of the Health Department continued to be silent and to silence others.
In one instance, the Health Department investigated the complaint of Avraham Yosef Yisrael, concerning the disappearance of his daughter, Si’eeda.  The conclusion they gave the father in the end was that his daughter had died, but when the family sought her grave, it turned out that “there is no record of such graves”.
The story of Yosef Si’eed from the transit of Rosh Ha’ayin was published in the newspapers.  The echoes of this incident were destined to reach the ears of government officials who were responsible for various departments and who dealt with immigrants from Yemen.
A thick smoke of silence accompanied stories of the disappearances of the children of Yemen.
(Haboker, Hatsofeh and Ha’aretz all from 03/07/1952)
On the Matter of The Children of Yemen
Here we shall quote a portion of an article that was published in newspapers from this month.
… a conspiracy of silence surrounds, to this day, the issue of the disappearance of hundreds of Yemenite babies who were taken (by force) from their parents as they arrived in Israel and who apparently were given over for adoption to influential families.
(The profit here was double: a] to remove them from their religion and b] monetary gain)
One of these fathers was ‘Ovadia Si’eed from Moshav  Tavuoth.  Today he is 65 years old.  He arrived in Israel with operation “Magic Carpet” in 1950.
His daughter, Zahara, 10 months old, was taken at the airport from her mother’s arms (by force) by a nurse who worked for the (Jewish) Agency.  All traces of her were lost from that day.
For decades her father, ‘Ovadia, tried to trace her whereabouts – in vain!  From time to time he would send pleading letters to tens of Knesset members requesting an investigation into the issue of the disappearance of the children of Yemen – in vain!
“Ha’aretz” continues to tell of the commerce that took place in Brazil with babies who were taken from their parents, and demands, in their naivety, an investigation into the disappearance of the children of Yemen.  (As if the thieves will investigate themselves?!).
“Are we beasts whose children’s fate is up for grabs?” asks the unfortunate father.
Not only did they make no serious effort to find the babies but they also afflicted the parents with false illusions!
In one letter from the director of population registration of the Department of the Interior, which was sent to the poor father, he says that his daughter, Zahara, is registered as somebody who immigrated in April, 1950 and that there is no other information.  However, in a letter from the Immigration and Registration Department in the same office it is recorded that Zahara left Israel in 1963.
What response will the religious officials and Knesset members have?
There was a period when Jewish children were kidnapped by the Russian Tsar Nikolai to serve in his army in 1827 in order to estrange them from their religion.  From that time, for over 120 years such kidnapping have not been known among the nations – the State of Israel renewed the tradition.
The investigator, Dov Levitan, who arranged a comprehensive investigation into the matter, notes in his investigation that each complaint was treated as an isolated incident despite the multitude of cases and their breadth.  No attempt was made to connect the cases or to see them as a wider problem.  This was first made clear at the end of 1952, during an internal investigation of the investigative branch of the police department.  According to this investigation, which examined six cases of children disappearing from Yemeni households, the police were not able to solve even one case!
Yeshurun Shiff of the investigative branch turned, in writing, to the director general of the Department of Health, as he notes: “We shouldn’t be indifferent to this unfortunate situation and I believe that it will cause waves within the public”.  That is to say: The fear was from full revelations to the public and this was what caused him to write the letter.  Among the official reasoning for this communiqué, notes the writer that, if the public finds out and the newspapers report the matter properly, there will be shame and anger”.
Perhaps this communiqué was partly to serve as an official alibi?  For we see, a case such as this necessitates a large police investigation within the Health Department and not just being satisfied with a “warning” and an invitation for “internal clarification” to answer the charges.

News Clips

A Yemeni mother and a Medical Professor
Hundreds of children born to Yemeni mothers have disappeared.  Most of them got death certificates.  However the heart thinks otherwise.
There is a more logical suspicion: that the children did not die but were given over for adoption.
By Eliezer Davidson
This week the newspapers published a very important fact.  It regards Mrs. Sarah Aharon, who turned to the High Court of Israel.
Mrs. Aharon, who emigrated in 1949 from Yemen during operation Magic Carpet, is convinced that the son she bore when she arrived in Israel, did not die – as the government claimed – but rather was given for adoption.
This legal plea focuses the spotlight once more on one of the shameful chapters of the immigration of the Jews of Yemen to Israel.
257 additional Yemeni Children disappeared in the early 50s
It is known that 30 of them are still alive and now efforts are being made to locate them * 170 of them do not appear within Department of Internal Affairs records at all * the number of missing children has now reached 599
–         By Amos Nevo of “Yediot Aharonoth” –
257 new incidents of children who disappeared during the great migration from Yemen to Israel in the early 50s, were revealed over the last few months.  With this, the number of missing Yemeni children reaches 599.
This new information is now being checked by the Public Council for Finding Missing Yemeni Children.  Dov Levitan, from the University of Bar Ilan, who is researching the topic, says that the latest findings have made it clear that 50 children of the 257 new cases have died.  170 have no record within the Department of Internal Affairs and 30 are still alive.  Now efforts will be made to locate them.  Until now it was known that 342 Yemeni children were missing; only four of them were found alive.  In the wake of these new efforts Yehoshua Kahana, manager of registration of citizens at the Department of Internal Affairs, has given an official statement to the head of Internal Affairs and an advisement to set up a governmental investigative council to get to the bottom of these disappearances.  A similar advisement  was tendered about a month and a half ago by the Internal Council of the Knesset to President Shimon Perez.

Report of negligence by the Health Department

From the report composed by Mr. Yahel – manager of the hospital division of the Health Department – it is recognized that he understood the hint and what was expected of him.

The report raises the specter of dedicated doctors working under adverse conditions and attacks those who organized the immigration for “lack of protocol” in registration.  He also attacks the parents for “not understanding what was said to them”, even though the Health Department and those in charge gave the parents “all the information”.   Dr. Yahel also emphasizes two incidents where parents did not demand their children from the WIZO Institute.  It seems that, in those cases, the people of WIZO “granted themselves permission” to give those children over to adoption.  Here we must note that during those difficult times, when the Yemenis lacked modern work skills as mentioned above, there were those who worked far from home and only returned to the camp after months had elapsed.
From the report we can see that Dr. Yahel was aware of the claim that the Ashkenazim sold the Yemenis to Ashkenazi families for adoption.  In response to this he writes: “Had there been an attempt to take children without permission, it would have been by parents seeking to take the children of others because of the chaos that reigned”…
The researcher Levitan adds his notes to the report:
A)               If it is true that the Health Department was not responsible for negligence and crimes at all – then why were the requests for information, of 1949-1952, not answered?!
B)               Not only this, but why was “TOP SECRET” written on the report?
C)              From the letter, it is implied that the Health Department was aware of the claims.  If so – why did it not counter them, and disprove them, at that time?!
The researcher Levitan agrees that the questions remain unanswered, however there are explanations to these questions, and they are: the chaos that reigned, at the time, within government offices where there was a free for all.  Not only this but – the general attitude that prevailed in certain corridors that Yemeni Jews are their own private property.

The “deceased” who refuses to be forgotten

500 missing aged 35-40.  Their 400 families were told that they had “died”.  Most were even told how they were buried, but this “deceased” refuses to be forgotten.  In one week those 400 Yemeni Families, whose children disappeared through mysterious circumstances, are to gather together and demand that interest in this matter be renewed publicly.  “Firstly we shall find those lost children, then we shall take care of whoever needs to be taken care of” – says Yosef Yighal –head of the local council of Rosh ha’Ayin who is responsible for the gathering.  Whoever is involved with these things and recognizes the new circumstances has what to be worried about –  an old/new “A social bomb” is about to explode in Israel.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | Leave a comment

The nature of money and taxation

There are many books, and articles, on libertarianism.  Most of them seem to fit into two basic genres: 1) deep libertarian theory/thought and 2) collections of anecdotes illustrating the abuses of government.  While the second genre seems to be somewhat popular for mass consumption, the general public tends to ignore the first genre.  Horror stories of government abuse, such as those found in John Stossel‘s books and “Lost Rights” by James Bovard (which I just got finished reading) make people angry – but they don’t do a good job of educating people as to the basic tenets of liberty.  Much is assumed and people rely on their innate sense of right and wrong.  Unfortunately, that sense has been compromised through generations of government education and trashy television.
Here I just wanted to remind people what “money” really is and why taxation equals slavery.  If I perform a service for somebody, I get paid in “money”.  So, in this sense, “money” is just a means to store credit for my labor – to be used at a later time.  If we had agreed, instead, that the beneficiary of my labor would repay me with his own labor, then money would not be necessary for this transaction.  It is only because I wish to use my labor-credit later on (or with somebody else) that money is used in this instance.  Whether I get paid in precious metal, coins or pieces of paper, the value of that “money” is only symbolic.  In the final analysis it is only an IOU.  It holds the value of my labor for later use.
When I use that money later on, I am actually trading my labor.  What if I got that money for goods instead of services?  It’s the same thing.  The goods can only be created via labor – either through transforming them from raw material into a useful product or by transporting them to those who need them.  Either way, labor is necessary.  If I used money to buy those goods and then resold them, it still all goes back to labor no matter how many times the original labor is removed.  “Labor” can be hard, back-breaking physical work or it could be talking or writing.  It’s all still labor.  I can receive the labor of somebody else through gift or inheritance.
If somebody takes my money, then really they are taking my labor.  If somebody steals my money, it’s the same thing as stealing my labor.  It means that I had worked for free.  If I consent to such takings, then I would be volunteering my labor – doing the other party a favor.  If the taking is not by my consent, then it turns out that I was being forced to work for free.  In other words, I was a slave.
We often hear people claim that they consent to taxation.  That they consider their contribution to be a sign of good citizenship.  I believe that most of them are lying because their actions say otherwise.  They do anything in their power to minimize their taxes, spending countless hours finding imaginative techniques to increase their “deductions”.  Most people would avoid paying taxes altogether if they could.  There are some taxes that almost nobody actually pays because it is so easy to hide those taxable activities from the government.  Use tax is a good example of this.
Many will ask, “how could society function without taxes?”.  Much has been written to answer this question and I will not address it here.  But, even if taxation is necessary, we could reword the question thus: how could society function without slavery?  I’m sure some ancient Romans asked the same question. Slavery is slavery, whether it is “necessary” or not.
I highly recommend Jonathan Gullible .  For those who lack the time, or inclination, to read the whole thing, there is a short animation you can watch.

Posted in libertarian thought | Leave a comment

The Origins of Consciousness…

Some of us, who study history, often wonder how the ancients might have been just like us and how they might have been quite different.  For decades, this question lurked in the dark recesses of my mind.  However, only once or twice did the question ever bubble up to the surface and become spoken.
Then, not very long ago, I was surfing the internet reading about something or other when I saw my question in print.  It turned out that another man had not only asked the question but he had even written a book about it.  In all fairness, the “consciousness” he was talking about is not exactly the same thing that most of us think of when we hear the word.  None the less, a fleshing out of my hunch was only a few clicks away!
I ordered the book “The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind” by Julian Jaynes.  It cost me 98 cents (plus shipping) on Amazon and was well worth the money.  Jaynes, it turned out, was a modern day Renaissance man.  Proficient in several languages, the history of religion, archeology, psychology and more, his book builds a fairly strong case that “consciousness” came into being only around 3,000 years ago, probably first amongst the Assyrians.  Most compelling are his comparisons of ancient texts from before the transformation to those following it.  He delves very deeply into the Iliad and the Odyssey, explaining that some parts were added later.  He does the same for various books of the Bible.  Even as brain scans were in their infancy at the time (the book was written in the 1970’s), he boldly predicts that, as technology advances, certain results would be seen within the field of hallucination and schizophrenia research.  Sure enough, his predictions came true and tend to support his theory.
Many, who hear this theory, wonder out loud, “how is it possible that humans who lacked consciousness could build the pyramids, sustain complex civilizations and even invent writing?”  The first few chapters give adequate answers to these questions.  Later chapters explain how the invention of writing helped seal the fate of the predecessor to the conscious mind: the “bicameral mind”.  In the bicameral mind, the left hemisphere of the brain would “speak” to the right hemisphere.  The ancients understood this as the voice of “God”:
“During the eras of the bicameral mind, we may suppose that the stress threshold for hallucinations was much, much lower than in either normal people or schizophrenics today.  The only stress necessary was that which occurs when a change in behavior is necessary because of some novelty in a situation.  Anything that could not be dealt with on the basis of habit, any conflict between work and fatigue, between attack and flight, any choice between whom to obey or what to do, anything that required any decision at all was sufficient to cause an auditory hallucination (pg. 93).”
Does Jaynes’ claim that ancient humans were all schizophrenics?  Not really; just that schizophrenia is a diseased version, a mutated throwback if you will, of what used to be normal.  His theory does unravel some mysteries such as why some ancient civilizations suddenly collapsed for no apparent reason (they reached a critical level of complexity no longer supported by the bicameral mind), how the Assyrians were able to so easily conquer their rivals (it was conscious versus bicameral – no contest) and the historical role of prophesy, idols and the Oracles (a yearning for the “Voice of God” that was lost).
As mentioned, it turns out not all humans became conscious at the same time.  Even back in the 70’s, when the book was written, political correctness was already very strong.  This is probably why Jaynes does not explicitly explain the conquest of the New World, by Europe, within the context of his theory.  But he does hint at it and his theory certainly helps explain how several hundred Spanish troops could have toppled mighty empires.
There is a website for Jaynes’ theory, and a related forum and there have been followup books such as “Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness”.  Unfortunately, Jaynes died in 1997 but his spirit lives on in his monumental ideas.

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links | 3 Comments

"Color Bind"

It seems only “people of color” can be victims of genocide in America:

“When Planned Parenthood opens its new center this Sunday on Northeast Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, it will face a diverse group of protesters.

Many of the 100 or so expected demonstrators will be African-Americans alleging that plopping new abortion clinics in neighborhoods with large African-American populations is tantamount to black genocide…

But Liz Delapoer, Planned Parenthood Columbia Willamette’s local marketing director, counters allegations the health-care provider targets African-American neighborhoods for abortion services.

Planned Parenthood has 16 centers throughout predominantly white Oregon, including one in Southeast Portland.  The new 40,000-square-foot clinic on MLK replaces one that is 11 blocks west.  And Delapoer notes that only 5 percent of Planned Parenthood’s services are abortion related…” (WillametteWeek Feb. 10, 2010).

I think it’s peculiar that blacks are concerned about genocide.  After all, their portion of the American population has been creeping up over the decades.  The following table is from Wikipedia:

If anybody should be concerned about genocide, it’s whites.

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 3 Comments

Zionist crimes against Jews

Much has been made of Zionist crimes against Palestinians, real or imagined, but less widely known are their crimes against fellow Jews.  I have, in my possession, a booklet entitled “The Children of Tehran Accuse”.  It was published in Jerusalem, 1943 even as the crimes were coming to light.

Secular Zionists sent people throughout Eastern Europe to spread the word that Jewish orphans should make their way to Tehran, Iran where they would be taken care of amongst their own until such time it would be safe to bring them to the Promised Land.  In this way, several hundred holocaust orphans found themselves under the auspices of secular Zionists in a strange land.  The Zionists proceeded to abuse, neglect and persecute the children.  They also forcibly estranged them from their religious roots.  Following is an excerpt, translated from Hebrew by yours truly:

The children are gathered

One by one or in small groups the Polish refugee children were gathered to Iran.  In the Spring of their days was revealed to them the dreadful aspects of life.  Three years of wandering, hunger, sickness and want was their lot.  Some of them escaped alone from the oppressive sword of the Nazi, without parents or acquaintances, like wild animals pursued (their enemies) at their necks.  Others crossed the border to Russia accompanied by their parents and with their own hands buried their fathers and mothers in the Siberian snow…and, behold, was sprung upon them the rage of the “instructors”, who took control over them.

The Polish government had established, in Tehran, a large camp for all refugee children, citizens of Poland and saw to all their needs.  They understood that, for religious educational reasons, it’s important to separate the Jewish children from the Christian children.

Therefore they looked with favor upon the request by the “Jewish Agency” in Tehran, to establish a camp for Jewish children and they ceded control to them, to be responsible for those Jewish children.  At the same time they (the Polish government) continued to provide for those children from its own pocket.  Mr. Shaefer, representative of the Jewish Agency in Tehran (Mr. Rosenblum came out against him in “haboker” Feb. 5th, 1947 with serious accusations involving his care of Jewish issues, issues that are not relevant here), handing over the management of the camp to the attorney Rodzinsky, a refugee from Vilnius who was half assimilated.  The latter then handed over educational responsibility to a member of “Shomer hatza’ir” (a far left group), David Levinburg who was also a refugee and the only one who knew Hebrew from among all the original adults who arrived in Tehran.  His knowledge of the language served him well, it seems, for he received the responsibility over the education of the children.  David Levinburg chose instructors from among his friends and acquaintances as he saw fit.  Most of these were unfit both from a teaching credential standpoint and from a Jewish standpoint.  A great proportion of them couldn’t even speak Yiddish.  Dr. Hirshberg, who migrated from Tehran to Israel, confirmed this fact from a meeting of the instructors which took place in Itlit, when he said:

Among the great assembly of instructors were isolated individuals who turned to me and said, “We want to learn Hebrew” but most didn’t even say that.  This is painful to me, for an instructor must first learn Hebrew and only then can he teach it.  Without Hebrew and without a personal, and deep, relationship with Hebrew culture and without the Hebrew spirit, no instructor has the right to teach these children who are destined to be the Hebrew youth of Israel.

Favoritism was what determined who would be an instructor, this is also the reason why up to 733 children who dwelt in the camp had 65 instructors.  This means one instructor for every 11 children – in no other institution for children do we find such a high ratio of instructors.  (These numbers were reported by Madam Szold during her speech before the instructors in Haifa, two days before the arrival of the children).

Religious Persecution

During the month of Elul, 1942 the special Jewish camp was set up.  With the arrival of the days of awe, Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur, the yearnings of these children, wise in the ways of the life of Torah, were especially strong.  After three years these were the first Jewish holidays that they would be able to observe properly more or less.  The instructors, who had decided to “prepare” the children for their future “experience in secular Israel” utilized every means at their disposal to stifle and uproot, in a calculating manner, any longings the children had for their religion and heritage.  The details of the lifestyle in Tehran were given to us via testimony by these children of Tehran: Nathan Alboym, 16, Avraham Frankle, 16:

Rosh Hashana.  On the night of Rosh Hashana all the children gathered together for evening prayers.  The prayers were fervent, emotional and full of tears.  The children prayed in the manner of their forefathers during the high holy days.  They prayed for the rescue of their families and for their own rescue.  The childrens’ prayers were viewed, by the instructors, as “hysterical nervousness” (so writes Bracha Habas in the name of Rodnitsky in her article in “Davar” from 18th Adar).  In the middle of the prayers, David Rosenberg entered and demanded to cease the prayers and to hurry up for a festive feast in honor of the holiday.  During the feast, none of the instructors or any members of the Agency refrained from smoking cigarettes – Rosh Hashana was on Sabbath that year (and smoking is strictly forbidden on Sabbath).  The following day the children sought to pray in the synagogue of Tehran.  Even though the prayers began at six o’clock, they were allowed to leave only at nine o’clock in the morning.  They reached the synagogue during the reading of the Torah.  The instructors forbade the children to enter inside the synagogue and so the children remained outside in the garden, even to hear the blowing of the shofar – no permission was given them.  After half an hour had passed, they took them from there and brought them to a coffee house.  A few of the children were able to sneak into the synagogue.  Those children were taken by force, via taxi, back to the camp.  The day after that they requested a shofar but their request was denied.

Yom Kippur.  After the kol nidre prayers, David Levinberg announced, in a loud voice, “children, time to eat”.  All the instructors sat down in the office, opened the windows completely and set up a feast in full sight of the children.  The witness, Nathan Alboym remained in the lobby until a late hour and recited psalms.  The instructor commanded him to cease and then turned off the lights.  The next day on Yom Kippur they transported the children to the city in buses, even though the camp was no more than twenty minutes by foot from the synagogue.  (This fact was certified by Mrs. Sertok, who visited Tehran on Agency business for a meeting with the council of Polish Jewry – attested to by Mr. Eliezer Sirkis) (travel, by motor vehicle, is prohibited on Sabbath and the holidays, including Yom Kippur).  They spent a short hour at the synagogue for the intent was to arouse the wealthy of Tehran to the plight of the children.  In fact wealthy donors pledged a sum of 60,000 Tomnis to benefit the camp.  One child sought to remain for the yizkor service to remember the souls of his parents.  The instructor Glicher struck him and removed him from the synagogue by force.

During the holiday of Sukkoth the children were not allowed to visit the city for prayers at all.  The children requested an ethrog for the benediction and were told: “for three years you were able to make do without an ethrog so you can do without one this year as well”.  During Simhath Torah they set up a party and distributed bread, butter and pig meat to honor the holiday.  They performed a play whose theme was the burning of the Holy Temple – not with prayer and mourning, rather with (joy that) the bricks would be used to build houses in Israel.

The issue of kosher.  The kitchen was not kosher (Mrs. Sirtok certified this fact during the above mentioned conference).  With minor effort it would have been possible to attain authorization and assistance from the Polish government to make the kitchen kosher, but the instructors refused to even raise a finger to this end.  At first many of the children refused to eat the non-kosher food.  They approached David Levinberg and asked him to increase their portions of bread or to give them other foods instead of meat and cooked foods that they don’t eat.  The above person refused using the excuse that there wasn’t enough money.  At that same time they were spending hundreds of Tomnis for theater and entertainment.  For David Levinberg’s birthday they purchased wine for the sum of 500 Tomnis, arranged a party for all the instructors, got drunk and carried on until the police got involved and arrested a few of them. 

Those who ate only kosher subsisted only on their regular portion of bread which was the same as was given to those who ate non-kosher.  There were instances of fainting and heart attacks from weakness and hunger.  David Levinberg told the doctor who treated one of the children who was fainting, who is the witness – Frankle: “who cares if one or two of them die from hunger.  Then they’ll give up on kosher”.  Over time, those who insisted on kosher diminished.  Not many were able to withstand this test after having been hungry for three years.  The child Binyamin Gezundheit related to Mrs. Wein, an instructor in a camp in Hadera (Israel) that when he demanded kosher food in Tehran they punished him and wouldn’t let him eat even permitted foods, until his will was broken and he ate non-kosher.  Frankel put together a list of children who requested kosher and it included about 250 names not counting the small children.  Only 14 children withstood the test and did not give in and it would be appropriate to recognize their names as a remembrance.”

The story of the Children of Tehran is only one example of the cruelty secular Zionists perpetrated upon their fellow Jews.  If there is interest, I’ll publish more of the pamphlet.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

From the mouth of leftists

At one point, I participated in a career retraining program paid for by the employment department and implemented by the local community college.  Some of the program, such as the refresher course on mathematics and grammar, was useful.  Other parts not so much.  We spent a few days on “diversity training” and the instructor spent quite some time stressing how important it is to avoid stereotyping or making generalizations about certain ethnic groups.  Then, toward the end of this module, we were given a document titled “Normative Communication Styles & Values For Cross-Cultural Collaboration”.  In plain English, this translates into: “what you can expect from different ethnic groups when it comes to communication if you’re working in a mixed group”.  The source, for this document, is “Candia Elliot Diversity Training Associates”,  “R. Jerry Adams, Ph. D, Evaluation and Development Institute” and “Suganya… Dept. of Human Resources, Oregon”.
The document deals with Anglo, Native, Hispanic, Asian and African groups.  It lists traits such as “Perceived right to set rules and agenda for meeting”, “Formal dress”, “Self-Identity…related to skin color or ethnicity”, “Ignoring ‘turns'”, “Self promotion”, “Gestures”, “Touching” etc.  Each group is rated as “Very little”, “Little”, “Medium”, “Much” or “Very Much”.
Here are the “Very Much” traits for Africans:
Animation/Emotional Expression
Gestures
Range of Pitch between words
Volume of speech
Directness of answers
Directness of rhetorical style, “getting to the point”
Ignoring “turns”
Self-promotion
Speed of Response
Collaborators must have community respect and support
Some participants, looking puzzled, asked the instructor how we could take this document seriously and, at the same time, reject “stereotypes”.  Indeed, we could easily rephrase the first seven traits as “crude, loud, undiplomatic and offensive”.  “Ignoring turns” could also be called “being rude by talking out of turn”.  “Self-promotion” could be “self-centered” or “selfish”.
Let’s look at how “Anglos” fair in the “Very Much” category:
Task-Based Purpose vs. Relationship
Written vs. verbal
Perceived right to set rules and agenda for meeting
Perceived right to speak freely at meeting
Formal dress
Perceived right to represent or speak for the group
Collaboration based on authority
Use first names vs. titles
Speed of Response
Directness of questions
Directness of answers
Directness of rhetorical style, “getting to the point”
Directness of eye contact
Firm, long handshaking
Concern with clock time
Individualism more than collateral group identity
The first thing that struck me is that any category starting with “perceived” is inhabited only by “Anglos”.  The implication is that “Anglos” feel entitled to more rights than they deserve.
In the “Very little” category, “Anglos” are the only ones listed for “Awareness of unearned ‘white’ privilege”.  We can only hope that this is accurate and that most whites do not believe in this imaginary bogeyman.  Not surprisingly, “Anglos” are also the only inhabitants of the category “Very little” when it comes to “Self-Identity… related to skin color or ethnicity”.   A somewhat positive way of looking at this would be that whites are the least “racist” of the groups.  However, I suspect that the leftists see this as a bad thing – since they expect whites to be intensely aware of their white skin and consider it a badge of shame.
Hispanics were rated as “Very little” within the trait of  “Concern with clock time”.  Perhaps this explains why every single Hispanic, at my workplace, disregards the rules when it comes to break times.  I suppose the leftists would forgive them for that and allow them longer breaks than “Anglos” in order to accommodate their “rich cultural heritage”.

Posted in examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 5 Comments

The cost of forced integration

According to La Griffe du Lion, black students improve (academically) slightly when they are placed among mostly white students.  White students, of course, suffer when blacks are introduced into their midst.  This minor benefit, to blacks, is limited to those individuals who are transferred to a more white environment.  What about black society as a whole?  Does it benefit from integration?  It seems to me that, as long as there are black neighborhoods, they will suffer because of integration programs.
Black neighborhoods will suffer because the brightest blacks siphon themselves off the top and remove themselves to white and Asian neighborhoods.  As a result, over time, black neighborhoods will get less and less intelligent overall.  As they become less intelligent, the incentive for the gifted will be even greater to leave.  This diabolical scenario is a result of leftist policies.  Leftist policies, having been translated into law, have created a huge demand for well-spoken and intelligent blacks.  Such blacks (often of mixed blood) can easily find high paying jobs in corporate America – which is forced to hire them to meet their “diversity” goals and avoid lawsuits.  Meanwhile, their brethren wallow in ignorance, crime, substance abuse and fatherless families.  The upwardly mobile blacks, having acquired all their more noble traits from whites, are usually not those who define “black culture”.  Instead, it is those who are left behind who define “black culture”.
Leftist ideology demands that blacks identify with their own culture and, indeed, every effort is made to exalt black heritage and culture.  This is the goal of “black history month”, “MLK day”, so many postage stamps, school assemblies, ethnic studies etc.
So we see that “black culture”, as practiced in America and most of the Western world, is defined by the lowest segments of black society.  We see that blacks are encouraged to identify with said “culture”.   Lastly, we see that this lowest segment of black society, “ghetto black society”, is deteriorating steadily because of brain drain.   This is the horrifying situation that leftists policies have wrought – but it doesn’t end there because it turns out that this “black culture” is being emulated by non-blacks as well.  Leftists have created a (pardon the pun) black hole situation and Western civilization is falling into it.
What is the solution?  Segregation – not by force of law but by force of social convention.  All that needs to take place is to let nature take its course and stop imposing forced integration upon us.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 2 Comments

The crypto-hater

I’ve known some fine people, in my time, who happened to be black.  I enjoyed their company and genuinely valued them as friends.  What would they think if they saw some of the comments I’ve made online about blacks in general?  Most likely, they would feel betrayed.  Perhaps even violated – because they would assume that I had been deceiving them, pretending to like them while I actually hated them in my heart.  Confronted with two personae (one flesh and blood and the other an online entity), they’ll choose the online persona as the “real” one.  It’s easy to see why; the anonymity of the internet allows people to express their true feelings while doing so in public, or at work, comes with serious risks.  A more mature approach would be to ask me what I meant by my online comments and why I posted them.  Then, if they listened, they would realize that there is no contradiction.  Racial differences express themselves on the group/societal level.  An individual can be what he chooses to be; there is always some level of free choice when it comes to being forgiving versus vindictive, charming versus offensive, hard-working versus lazy.

I don’t think it should be our business to determine what secret emotions might lie deep within the psyches of our acquaintances.  Some of my best friends might be secret anti-Semites or anti-libertarians or anti-American.  As long as they treat me right and express no such animosity toward me, it makes no difference to me that, deep inside, there’s an ember of hate.  I suspect we all have private feelings we’d rather not reveal to our friends, family and co-workers.  One could only imagine the chaos that would ensue if all of our innermost thoughts became public.  Society would probably collapse.

We have free will regarding what comes out of our mouths.  I’m not sure we have free will regarding what comes into our minds.  Such things should certainly not be held against us.  I opine that internet posts are, in some cases, closer to thought than to speech.  If speech is a private matter that should not be limited by government, how much more so free thought.  But now I’ve strayed from the topic of this post.

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 10 Comments

The "Jewish problem" and white nationalists

In case you haven’t already noticed, I’m Jewish.  But this does not blind me to the fact that there seem to be Jews lurking behind very many leftist movements and anti-white organizations.  How does a decent, law-abiding black feel when a high profile criminal turns out to be black?   It probably makes him sick to his stomach because, at some level, it makes him feel guilty by association.  Well I’m the same way when I discover Jewish names, symbols and organizations associated with causes that I hate.
Is there a vast Jewish conspiracy to exterminate white people or to take over the world?  If there is, somehow I did not get the memo.   Neither did Professor Michael Levin or Rabbi Mayer Schiller.  Books have been written on why Jews are particularly susceptible to leftist brainwashing and it is not the aim of this post to explore this.
I have had email exchanges with individuals, associated with the white nationalist movement, who refuse to believe that my motives are pure.  They’ll scrutinize every word of my comments on Amren in order to find “evidence” that I’m part of some “Jewish supremacist” movement.  They’d have just as much luck finding such “evidence” among random posts by gentiles because I do not believe in Jewish supremacy.  Just as a white person should care about his own people, put them first, advocate for them and identify with them so too should a Jew relate to his own people.  Just as such a white person need not be a “white supremacist” so too the Jew need not be a “Jewish supremacist”.  Of course, in my opinion, many Jews are also white so the same person can identify as Jewish and as white.
That there are Jews who sympathize with white nationalists should be a source of comfort.  Yet we find many white nationalists rejecting such sympathy.  I cannot delve into their minds but one of two things might be going on here.  Either they are so paranoid and suspicious that they truly believe people like me are spies or they find us upsetting because we spoil the well-ordered world they’ve constructed in their heads where all Jews must be evil.
Sometimes I visit white nationalist forums and I’ll find accusations leveled at “The Jews”.   A Jew of thinner skin might take personal offense at such words but it seems to me that, if it’s alright to speak of “white people” or “black people” or “Hispanics” in general terms (fully understanding that not all members of those groups adhere to the generality), then the same should be alright regarding Jews.  So I’ll give such people the benefit of a doubt and assume they know not all Jews are out to get them.
Many, if not most, white nationalists consider Jews to be non-white.  By what magic a religious conversion can change a person’s race I do not know.  It is a fact that many Jews are descended from white converts and so they are clearly white.  But it shouldn’t matter; Jews should consider themselves Jews and only marry other Jews anyway.  As for me, it makes no difference to me whether white nationalists consider me white or not.  Thankfully, I have my own identity that I’m perfectly content with.  One way or the other, this should not affect my sympathy toward white people.  Advocating for whites is a worthy cause no matter what race or ethnicity you happen to be.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 28 Comments