“Fact-Checking” Claims of Anti-White Bigotry

Posted on January 27, 2023 by jewamongyou

Some of ya’ll might remember that a while back, America First Legal aired a television ad complaining of anti-White bigotry by the Biden administration.

It turns out that there is no such thing as anti-White bigotry, because a “fact-checker” says so…

… just kidding. But here’s what I found in a Quora space dedicated to opposing the space It’s Okay to be White (IOTBW). It’s called “Anti IOTBW:”

Indeed, the people at IOTBW do need to read it, preferably along with my observations, lest anybody be fooled.

First I’ll point out that the article does not claim to prove that there is no anti-White bigotry in the US. In fact, it doesn’t even assert that all the claims in the ad are false, just that SOME of them are false:

Radio and TV ads from a group headed by a former senior adviser to Donald Trump accuse President Joe Biden and the left of “racism against white people” and “anti-white bigotry.” But in context, some of the claims about the alleged “anti-white” policies and statements don’t hold up.

The article does point out that some of the lawsuits against the Biden administration were successful, but let’s focus on the ones that this “fact-checker” claims are false:

The TV version of the ad cites an article about that issue as the ad’s narrator claims, “Joe Biden put white people last in line for COVID relief funds.” But even in the original language of the policy, that’s not accurate, since women, veterans and economically disadvantaged people could be white people.

One wonders if these “fact-checkers” are genuinely stupid, or if they’re simply trying to mislead stupid people.

I know it’s hackneyed, but let’s reverse the races: Blacks go to the back of the line, except female, veteran and poor blacks. Meanwhile, ALL Whites go to the front of the line. Would this not be considered racial discrimination? Of course it would, because when one group gets preference by virtue of its race, while other groups need additional characteristics, it’s discriminatory.

… the radio ad says, “Kamala Harris said disaster aid should go to nonwhite citizens first.” In October, we fact-checked a claim by U.S. Sen. Rick Scott of Florida and other conservative commentators and news outlets that the vice president said hurricane relief from the Federal Emergency Management Agency would be based on race.

“Harris said … that, you know, if you have a different skin color, you’re going to get relief,” Scott said in an Oct. 2 interview on CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

The following day, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted at Harris: “Hurricanes do not discriminate. And neither should the federal government giving aid to people suffering from the devastation of Hurricane Ian. Is your husband’s life worth less bc he’s white?”

But we found that Harris’ words were being lifted out of context.

The article goes on to quote the White House press secretary, Jean-Pierre:

Jean-Pierre, Oct. 3: So that is not what the vice president said. The vice president was clearly talking about long-term investment, not FEMA aid, for hurricane response efforts. The vice president and the president have been clear that the federal government has been and will continue to be there for all Americans recovering from these devastating storms. … We are committed to quickly getting resources to all communities impacted, period, full stop. But we also know that some people, particularly in lower-income communities, have a hard time accessing that help. That’s why this administration has also made it a priority to remove barriers and ensure that everyone, regardless of their ZIP Code, can access federal resources. And that’s what she was talking about.

What des she mean by “long-term investment?” Was she talking about stocks and bonds? Infrastructure? The article doesn’t specify, but a similar Reuters “fact-check” article does:

The short clip cuts the full context of the comment, where Harris was asked about Hurricane Ian relief efforts as well as how the United States should respond to climate change impacts more broadly…

Harris continued, referencing climate-related natural disasters generally (6:04s): “The crisis is real, and the clock is ticking…the way that I think of it, is both in terms of the human toll, and I know we are all thinking about the families Florida, in Puerto Rico with Fiona, and what we need to do to help them in terms of an immediate response in aid, but also what we need to do to help restore communities, and build communities back up in a way that they can be resilient, not to mention adapt, to these extreme weather conditions which are part of the future…”

Addressing Chopra Jonas’ point about disparities, Harris noted, “… it is our lowest income communities and our communities of color that are most impacted by these extreme conditions and, and impacted by, by issues that are not of their own making … we have to address this in a way that is about giving resources based on equity. Understanding that we, we fight for equality, but we also need to fight for equity, understanding not everyone starts out at the same place. And if we want people to be in an equal place sometimes, we have to take into account those disparities and, and do that work…”

In other words, the truth is even WORSE than what the ad implies. Harris is saying that “equity” (IE. preference to non-Whites and women) should be a priority not only in Florida, but all over the world, not only now, but ALL THE TIME. That’s like a criminal defending himself in court by stating:

This one particular crime is not a big deal. I engage in crime all the time. In fact, it’s a lifestyle for me. It’s part of my culture.

Nobody is claiming to have evidence of specific anti-White discrimination in this case. The ad is only saying that Harris expressed an opinion that non-Whites should get preferential treatment – and this is true, but on a LARGER SCALE than one might think.

Next, the “fact-checkers” tackle Trump’s claim that Whites were to be last in line for Covid vaccines:

As for the ads’ claim that “liberal politicians block access to medicine based on skin color,” back in January, we fact-checked a similar claim by Trump. “The left is now rationing life-saving therapeutics based on race, discriminating against and denigrating, just denigrating, white people to determine who lives and who dies. If you’re white, you don’t get the vaccine or if you’re white, you don’t get therapeutics,” he claimed.

As we wrote then, no one was being denied access to vaccines. The White House made clear it had enough vaccine doses available to get every American fully vaccinated, including a booster shot.

The issue was about therapeutics, some of which were in limited supply, but there is no evidence that white people were being denied COVID-19 therapeutics, either. Still, Trump accused New York state of discriminating against white people, saying its prioritization policy for COVID-19 treatment during times of limited resources was “anti-American.”

Even if the issue was strictly about therapeutics, it would still constitute anti-White discrimination. However, there was a CDC decision to also give priority to non-Whites for the vaccines – and this decision was reversed after public outcry:

It’s clear that this “fact-checker” is not trying to get to the truth, but squirming, splitting hairs and obfuscating in order to advance his own ideology. The prioritization of non-Whites, for Covid treatment, is documented. An impartial fact-check would have pointed this out.

Furthermore, as a rule of thumb, whenever we see leftists using the phrase “there is no evidence that…” our reaction should be: Were there any studies that LOOKED for evidence? If the powers-that-be aren’t looking for something, then they probably won’t find it, and more often than not, they will not fund or support studies that might poke holes in their narratives.

Therefore, we should consider it likely that White people were denied Covid vaccines/treatment due to their race – until there are valid studies that LOOKED for such people, and failed to find them.

I’ll conclude by pointing out that most people will not read the entire “fact-check” article; they’ll read the headline, see that it’s fairly long, and then cite it as “evidence” that “The Trumpanzees have been lying again!” Those who DO read the entire article will see that a large chuck of it is simply describing the activities (many of them successful) of America First Legal. The article does not dispute most of the accusations, only the ones I have listed above.

Please let me know, in comments, if you find any errors. It’s a complicated subject. I know it’s hard to believe, but I’m not perfect… however, we can make this post perfect by pointing out errors, so that I can correct them.

Posted in examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Save the Pandas—Kill the White People!

Posted on January 23, 2023 by jewamongyou

Steven Tucker just wrote an excellent piece on The Great Replacement “Theory.” I strongly recommend reading it in its entirety.

In a nutshell, Tucker provides some background information about the recent shooting of three random Kurds in Paris by William Malet. It turns out (surprise!) that Malet didn’t just wake up one morning, get bored, and think to himself, “I’m bored; I think I’ll go out and kill me some ragheads!”

Tucker elaborates:

In 2016, three young men of “North African heritage” (media-speak for “Muslim criminals”) had broken into his home. He had confronted them with a kitchen knife—rather than simply bending over and eagerly asking if they’d like to rape him, too, as contemporary polite liberal etiquette now recommends—then was sentenced to twelve months in prison for his unacceptable show of resistance. Worse, two of the injured burglars later sued him for €30,000 in damages, thereby literally making victims out of criminals and criminals out of victims.

Regarding the Great Replacement “Theory,” Tucker explains:

Data shows the Great Replacement really is occurring—that’s why saying so obviously now needs to be threatened with legal censorship—but the main factors behind it are probably not some implausible, planet-spanning, deliberate Jewish-globalist plot, as a hard-core minority of actual conspiracists maintain, but impersonal socioeconomic forces such as panda-like low white birth rates and the resultant Western demand for cheap, replacement immigrant labor from abroad.

I think Tucker could have, and should have, gone a bit further. A casual reader might conclude that there’s a range of opinions, among conservatives and White-advocates, regarding the nature of The Great Replacement, but not so much among those who actually perpetrate it.

This is not the case, and it cannot be the case. There are a great many people, in various levels of hierarchy, who orchestrate The Great Replacement; they are not a monolithic group. Many of them do fall under the category that Tucker describes, looking after their own short-term monetary interests.

Do they ALL fall into this category? Of course not. Some of them are, without doubt, working deliberately toward the destruction of White communities in the West. There are several good articles on American Renaissance documenting this… and, of course, there’s Biden publicly stating that The Great Replacement is something to be proud of:

I’ve used the above clip several times in my debates with replacement-denialists. It ends the debate every time; those leftists are the same people who constantly ridicule Whites who feel pride in their race. “You should only feel pride for something you have actually DONE,” they shriek. How are they to respond when their president says he’s proud of The Great Replacement?

In conclusion, there is a spectrum both within those who oppose The Great Replacement, and those who support it. Replacement-denialists lie by omission when they recognize only a small group of replacement opponents, and replacement opponents err when they recognize only the replacement-perpetrators who are driven by money; some are driven by politics or ideology.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Micro-Aggressions Victims Unit (MVU)

Posted on January 19, 2023 by jewamongyou

Let’s take a break from our dreary lives, and enjoy this gem from the Babylon Bee:

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, feminism and men's issues, parody/satire | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Change.Org Petition to Stop Execution Richard Moore

Posted on January 15, 2023 by jewamongyou

The sick ideology known as “Critical Race Theory” teaches that all Whites are considered racist, by default, against blacks. Taken to its logical conclusion, this would mean that our system of Trial by Jury is flawed, and needs to be amended. If all Whites are racist, consciously or otherwise, then this means no black defendant can expect a fair trial when all, or most, of the jury is White.

Once this flawed conclusion is reached, it’s only a matter of time before policies are implemented where only black jurors can serve when the defendant is black. In contrast, since blacks cannot be racist, there is no reason to prevent blacks being on a jury when the defendant is White.

Watch for it; you heard it from me…

… and we’re already seeing the groundwork for such policies being laid. Too many times, we’ve seen news stories decrying the fact that so-and-so black defendant was “convicted by an all-White jury” – as if this necessarily means the trial was unfair.

Case in point: Richard Moore. Convicted in 1999 or murdering a White store clerk during a robbery, Moore was sentenced to death. In case you’re bad at math, or consider it racist, this means the murder was about 24 years ago. If there was misconduct during the trial, or new evidence has come to light, then by all means, let’s retry Moore.

The Change.org petition makes no mention of any such misconduct or new evidence. It makes four arguments:

  1. That the jury was “all White”
  2. That Moore was unarmed when he entered the store, and had no intention to kill
  3. That the mode of death now presented is “cruel and unusual” and
  4. That blacks are overrepresented in death penalty cases.

Without getting into details of the last three arguments, it’s telling that the very first one is that the jury was “all White, and that the victim was White.” The presumption is that Whites are biased toward black criminals when the victim was White. Would a black jury be more objective? Does anybody remember O.J. Simpson?

Mr. Moore was convicted and sentenced to death for the alleged murder of a white male store owner by an all white jury (11 White and 1 Latino) during what was reported to be a robbery.  Mr. Moore entered a convenience store unarmed with no intent to kill, and did not own the gun that was fired during the altercation. The owner of the store was killed during the incident. 

How much longer before every verdict where the jury was all, or mostly, White is thrown out? I foresee a day, in the not too distant future, where this will happen. As a result, many thousands of dangerous criminals will be let loose on society. They will kill again.

To recap:

CRT teaches that all Whites are racist by default. All White juries are, therefore, unacceptable for black defendants. Based on this conclusion, all the verdicts of such trials are thrown out. Thousands of vicious, hardened, criminals are let loose. Many innocent Americans are murdered or raped as a result.

CRT kills!

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What Are We Doing to White People

Posted on January 12, 2023 by jewamongyou

Westernkind Art posted this video to Twitter:

I was impressed with the video, especially considering how young Mr. Cheon is. I predict great things for this young man, and told him so in comments…

Speaking of comments, many of the comments are from other non-Whites who agree with him. We do have many non-White allies, and it has always been my position that we should recognize them and encourage them.

Westernkind Art has this to say:

Interestingly, while he does encourage nonWhites to treat Whites well, he seems certain of the reduction of White political and economic power and doesn’t condemn this. While this video is still insightful and surprising coming from a nonWhite, his message is condescending.

It seems to me there are two schools of thought in the Dissident Right: Purists and Pragmatists. Though I sympathize with the Purists, I find myself in the Pragmatist camp. It’s my view that if we demand 100% compliance or nothing, we’ll end up with nothing. There are at least two reasons for this. Firstly, we don’t have the power to demand all we want; we’re lucky to get some of it. Secondly, few of us can reach an agreement on what our ultimate goals are. If we were to ever get close, we’d be fighting to the very end about the details.

Verily, reasonable men can take either position, and I’ve had ongoing feuds with fellow White-advocates on this very subject. It’s clear to me that neither side will ever be able to convince the other, and reality on the ground will be the final arbiter.

Spoiler alert: We will NOT get everything we want within our lifetimes. Best to make the most of what we CAN get. Furthermore, common decency demands that we recognize those who support us, regardless of their race or ethnicity.

I’ll conclude by pointing out that Jared Taylor agrees with me. One of his most moving speeches, at least for me, was a short one he made at one of the Amren conferences, where he recognized our non-White allies. His speech was so heartfelt, almost tearful, that it made a huge impression on me. Unfortunately, that speech was not recorded.

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Why Not Turn Yourself In To The Police?

Posted on January 9, 2023 by jewamongyou

A video has been circulating, showing a man robbing a restaurant in Texas. As he was wrapping it up, and on his way out, a diner shot him dead. When I first saw the video, the full version was available. Now it’s been scrubbed from the internet, and only a truncated version is available.

The robber was black, and the shooter is White. After shooting him, the diner approached the now horizontal robber, and finished him off. When shot, the robber had his gun (which turned out to be fake) aimed at an employee; he still posed a danger. Here’s the truncated version, with Andy Ngo’s commentary:

There are many insightful comments on Twitter, mostly explaining why the shooting was justified. Some have raised questions about the second shot, not shown in this video. We can’t tell exactly what happened…

… but I’ll add my own insightful comments.

Even if the robber posed NO FURTHER THREAT to anyone in the restaurant, the diner was still justified in confirming the kill. Why? Because the diner probably didn’t know that a security camera was capturing the incident, and had the robber lived, it would have been his word against the robber – a White man’s word against a black man. Regardless of what actually transpired, the media would have published headlines quoting the robber as saying, “I put my hands up and begged him not to shoot! He called me a dirty nigger and pulled the trigger. Praise the Lord I’m still alive to raise my ten children.”

Who knows how cooperative the one or two witnesses would have been. Perhaps they would have been too traumatized to be of any use. Perhaps they would have been hostile. Perhaps the man sitting across from the shooter has good reasons to avoid being a witness.

When they find the shooter, thousands of leftists will be searching any social media posts he may have made – going back as far as possible. ANYTHING he might have posted, even in jest, will be used against him. If he appeared somewhere making the “okay” hand gesture, it will be used as “evidence” that he’s a White-supremacist. They’ll contact members of his family, neighbors and coworkers. Maybe he made an off-color joke once at work. That will be used as “evidence” that he’s a bigot.

For argument’s sake, let’s say the man is a flaming neo-Nazi. Does that mean he was wrong to shoot the robber? Do neo-Nazis lack the right of self-defense or the duty to protect others? The media will announce to a gullible world: NEO-NAZI murders helpless black man in cold blood!! The odds of getting a fair trial would be slim to none.

As a White man in today’s America, even in Texas, it’s doubtful he’ll get a fair shake. With luck, the prosecutor might decline to press charges – and then there will be protests. We’ve seen this before, and the prosecutor changes his mind. It’s all downhill from there.

Maybe I’m wrong in this case. After all, there are still pockets of sanity in this once-great country. They are getting fewer and fewer. Let’s hope fortune smiles on this man.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

European Union Orders Stained-Glass Windows Destroyed; They Lack Diversity

Posted on January 6, 2023 by jewamongyou

In a long-overdue decision, the European Union president Charles Michel has announced that member states must destroy most stained-glass windows, depicting people, within cathedrals and churches.

The reason for this edict should be obvious: They lack diversity. The ruling doesn’t apply if the windows are inclusive (defined as depicting 100% people of color or LGBTQ).

To much fanfare, Michel explained:

We cannot move forward unless we confront our racist past. Science has proven, with Cheddar Man, that Europe’s native people were people of color. They were MIGRANTS! Whites came later and slaughtered the native, peaceful, inhabitants, just like in America.

Unfortunately, we cannot bring Cheddar Man’s people back, but it behooves us to correct what we can – and medieval stained-glass windows, depicting white people, have no place in the New Europe.

To illustrate his point, Michel displayed a hideous example of the white-supremacy he was referring to:

Naturally, some extremists on the far-right have objected to this decision. Some have even suggested that instead of destroying the windows, they should modify them. With modern technology, it should be possible to alter the appearance of the people so that they appear African American. It has even been suggested that the face of St. Martin Luther King be used as a model – or St. George Floyd.

More rational people have rejected this nonsense on the grounds that even if we were to fix the windows, they still carry the legacy of racism. This is not acceptable.

Pope Francis has applauded the European Union for this decision. He has even gone the extra mile, showing his piety by offering to purge the Vatican Museum of all depictions of white people.

I applaud this decision. In the name of the Lord, and His son Jesus Christ, we have a spiritual duty to rid ourselves of whiteness. I am ordering all depictions of whiteness to be removed from the Vatican Museum. It is unacceptable that its millions of visitors be forced to endure such hate.

Europe has had a whiteness problem for far too long. It is time to put an end to it. A “Final Solution” if you will. Greek and Roman statues, medieval tapestries, classical paintings and, of course, the stained-glass windows will all be purged.

Praise the Lord!

Indeed, we haven’t had such a righteous pope since St. Peter. This is the true meaning of Christianity, to cleanse ourselves of hate. Hate has no place in the Vatican or in any church.

Asked if the European Union would take steps to remove crosses as well, since many migrants find them offensive, Michel replied:

The battle for tolerance cannot be fought in one day. I fully appreciate the trauma and hurt that our migrant sisters must feel when they are forced to confront this symbol of bigotry and intolerance. Those women and children have suffered enough, braving human traffickers, dangerous seas and cold to reach our shores… and then… to be confronted with this symbol of colonialism and hate… it’s just too much.

There will come a day, soon, when we’ll address this problem. Mark my words.

Posted in parody/satire | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Removed From Quora for “Hate-Speech”

Posted on December 25, 2022 by jewamongyou

As some of y’all know, I moderate the Quora group It’s Okay to be White. Trying to keep inferior posts to a minimum, and maintain some level of quality, is an uphill struggle. The group now has well over 30,000 followers.

One pet peeve of mine is when pro-Whites object to reparations “because nobody alive today was a slave or a slave-owner.” In response to one such post, I commented:

I approved this answer to make a point: None of us can be taken seriously when we don’t know what our opponents actually say. Frankie, do you actually believe that leftists want reparations for slaves who are alive today? The following is their position, in a nutshell:

  1. Slavery, and subsequent Jim Crow laws/redlining etc. set in motion a series of events, and circumstances, where blacks were disadvantaged. This continues to our own time.
  2. Reparations aren’t only for slavery, but also for other injustices, such as housing discrimination, mortgage discrimination, overpolicing etc.

There are plenty of good rebuttals to both. For example:

  1. If slavery/Jim Crow were the actual cause for today’s disparities, we would see the disparities diminishing as those institutions fade into the past. Instead, we see the OPPOSITE; since the Civil Rights Act, black crime, illegitimacy, poverty and academic failure have gotten WORSE, not better.
  2. If we’re going to look at such recent injustices toward blacks, then we must also look at injustices toward Whites. For example, how much in extra taxes have White people paid due to black criminality, disproportionate welfare and incarceration? How much have Whites lost due to their housing being devalued as a result of black incursions into White neighborhoods (and the accompanying crime)? How many Whites had their childhoods destroyed due to excessive black-on-White bullying and assaults? How many White families have been destroyed by black-on-White homicide and rape?

Let’s UNDERSTAND opposing views, and then offer intelligent responses, instead of regurgitating the same old tired talking points.

In less than an hour, I was informed that my comment was deleted for “hate-speech:”

Your content has been deleted as it was found to be in violation of our Hate Speech policy. To learn more about our Spaces policy, click here. If you think this is an error, you can appeal here.

The reason I bring this up is that I think it’s a good example of how the censors will tolerate low-quality pro-white content (it makes us look bad), but remove high-quality content.

We see this same approach in how the media relates to toothless, tattooed skinheads versus Jared Taylor; it ignores Mr. Taylor, but will gladly put the skinhead on display for its gullible audience all day long.

Then again, maybe I’m flattering myself, and there are other reasons my comment was removed.

Edit: My post was restored on appeal.

Posted in Africa and blacks, freedom of speech issues, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

With No Access to White Women, Moroccans are Forced to Have Sex with Donkeys

Posted on December 22, 2022 by jewamongyou

The European Union and the United States should increase the number of migrants immediately. Due to a dearth of White women in Africa, we have learned that some African youth have, out of desperation, taken to having sex with donkeys.

We’re supposed to pride ourselves in our humanitarian ideals, in our love for fellow human beings. How then, can we justify placing barriers in front of the millions of African men who wish to improve their lives, and gain access to White women?

From Decan Chronicle:

Fifteen teenagers get rabies after raping donkey

Fifteen youngsters developed an ‘admiration’ for a donkey spent a week in a Moroccan hospital after catching a highly-contagious disease from the beast.

The fifteen teenagers from rural Morocco had to be treated for rabies after reportedly gang raping an infected local donkey.

Had we simply allowed these young men to migrate to the West, this never would have happened. The donkey would not have been raped, and these gentlemen would have been spared the horrors of rabies.

Biden and EU leaders, this message is for YOU! I urge you to airlift all African males to Europe and the US immediately! There can be no more excuses, and no more delays. Access to White females is a human right, and it is our moral duty to protect this right, and to guarantee a level playing field. There can be no level playing field as long as even ONE African man remains in Africa.

Note: Hat tip to Diversity Chronicle for the news link.

Posted in Africa and blacks, immigration/ Hispanics, parody/satire | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

This is Why They had Segregation

Posted on December 22, 2022 by jewamongyou

The technical term for this type of behavior is “chimp out.” In this case, assuming the background information in the tweet is accurate, it’s a good example of what I’ve been saying for years: Blacks are trained from an early age to assume racism is the reason for life’s inconveniences.

Of course, the corporate media won’t report this story, except maybe local news. Hence, the masses remain ignorant… but there was a recent incident where a White police officer was forced off a crime scene by a racist black mob. MSN included it on its page – but made sure to have it embedded several minutes into a video by a black conservative. Here’s the incident:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1605279555912187906

Here’s another “non-story” that’s hard to watch. Not “news” according to the corporate media:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1604790597088600065
Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments