Antifa hysteria in Portland

After our Back the Blue rally today, which was uneventful, a few Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer guys led us to the spot where Aaron Danielson was murdered in September. One of the men (Chandler Pappas) was a personal friend of Danielson, and wanted to hold a memorial service/public protest against Oregon prosecutors.

Here’s part of the speech (turn up the volume on the first one):

Shortly after that, Antifa showed up (start at about 3:27 to see the assaults):

I wasn’t able to capture some of their most outrageous conduct. For example, one of the Antifa, encouraged by the others, actually climbed the tree, removed the flags etc. placed there in memory of Danielson, and burned the flag on the street.

At that point, Chandler became very upset, and chased after the culprit. It’s hard to blame him; Danielson and Chandler were together that fateful night, and Chandler was right there when his friend was murdered. What kind of “person” tears down a memorial to a murdered man, and burns it on the street in front of the surviving friend? After this happened, there was a commotion, as they all disappeared, running, down the street. I was worried about Chandler.

A few minutes later, he returned. He had been pepper-sprayed in the face and was in pain. We sheltered him from the mob and some of his buddies tended to him. Somebody called the police at that point. A couple of us were using US flags to provide some privacy, and one Antifa kept trying to set my flag on fire. He kept moving his lighter up to the flag, and I kept moving it away. He seemed to think it was some kind of game.

Is setting fire to a flag someone is holding considered “assault?” I’m not a lawyer, and so many legal questions come up in such situations. Unfortunately, this means our hands are tied as far as defending ourselves; no matter what we do, it will be scrutinized later by the courts; every excuse will be made to prosecute us.

There were a couple of times when Antifa barked at me, and tried to get a response from me. I refused to respond, or acknowledge them in any way. Also, I was able to walk past them a few times, and nobody assaulted me, though they did hurl unkind words at me.

When the police showed up, they remained about a block away. I showed them the first video, and helped file an assault report. I don’t think anything will come of it, and when I pointed the culprit out, to the police later, I was told that they are not making any arrests. After a few minutes, the police left, with us on one side of the street, and Antifa on the other – as Antifa tried to intimidate us and throw things at us. One hysterical man came at one of the Proud Boys trying to start a fight.

While the police were still there, and Antifa was opposite us, I unfurled my “Antifa Loves Cops” sign, and my new “C’mon Man! Back the Blue” sign. The howls from Antifa were priceless – along with smiles from the police.

Each time one of Antifa tried to start a fight, others would eventually come over and try to pull him away – so not all of them were interested in violence. Certainly, none of us were.

In such confrontations, what sometimes happens is that neither side is willing to leave the scene; to do so would look like a retreat and weakness, so it can go on for hours. But I had other things to do, so I left to go about my day. I hope it ended with nobody seriously hurt.

I asked a Proud Boy member what he thought of Trump’s condemnation of his organization. He replied that “it’s just politics, and the fact that Proud Boys was brought up in the debate helped them greatly.” New memberships have picked up immensely. It reminded me of what happened when Hillary Clinton gave the Alt-Right free publicity.

Edit: One of our people was viciously attacked as he got into his car after the rally. From his Facebook post:

… As some of you know I was hit in the head with a bat getting into my car. Had to go to the hospital and get stitches… Not going to lie it hurts bad…

I would give my life for any one of you. It never crosses my mind that I could possibly lose mine for no reason. I show up not only to support our officers and their families but also try to protect them and their families and other supporters.

See all my life I’ve hated bullies. Antifa are just that… Bullies… They have no morals. No back bone. They target peaceful people, mostly women, children and older people. It’s a coward’s way of life.

I’m not going to stop coming out. I’ll admit though from now on I will be coming out with my carry permit and armed. I will never again be a victim.

Things are getting more violent and when you go out, go with other people. Me and my wife were alone when I was attacked… (edited a little for typos by JAY).

Edit #2: I don’t remember this, so it must have occurred after I left. The woman is part of our Back the Blue group:

Edit #3: It’s been a couple of days, and it has now become apparent that the corporate media has entirely ignored this event – despite the fact that several members of the press were present, and they DID report on the riots that night.

That night’s riots were, based on reports, exactly the same as all the other Portland riots over the past 100 days or so. There was nothing newsworthy about the night’s riots; our daytime confrontation was more newsworthy.

I can only conclude that the reporters were specifically looking for some footage that would portray the right-wingers in a bad light – but all the footage showed Antifa in a bad light, so they couldn’t use it. Hence, this is an example of media bias and propaganda by omission.

Posted in activism, examples of propaganda | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

A Couple of Lawsuits to Watch

Downtown Portland businesses have paid a heavy price for the city’s politicians’ refusal to prosecute rioters, and their refusal to allow police to put a decisive stop to the riots. Now a business owner is suing the City of Portland for this negligence. From KATU2:

PORTLAND, Ore. — A downtown Portland jewelry store owner intends to sue the City of Portland for its handling of protests in late May.

Noha Kassab, CEO of Kassab Jewelers, said her family-owned store was was broken into and looted early in the morning on May 30. This was during the beginning stages of what would lead to more than 100 days of protest in Portland.

“I started looking on my phone to see who was in my store, it was bunch of people going into the store, broke glass, it was the most painful, disheartening experience I ever faced,” said Kassab.

The store owner said they are still calculating the costs, but estimates $2.5 million in damages…

“I’m not someone who came to this country with money. I came with an American dream. To see my American dream destroyed and it could have been preventable, is disheartening,” said Kassab.

Kassab filed tort claim notice with the city in mid-September. She alleges Portland leaders, “failed to plan or prepare for, and failed to adequately protect, downtown businesses.”

The storefront on Southwest Broadway is the company’s flagship location. They also have jewelry stores in Lake Oswego and Washington Square Mall.

“I hope to let the city know the amount of pain they have caused for failing to protect the businesses...

Let’s hope this lawsuit, and others like it, are expensive enough to motivate Portlanders to vote smarter in the future.

The second lawsuit is from Patriot Prayer leader Joey Gibson. From The New York Post:

The leader of the far-right group Patriot Prayer is suing the district attorney of the Portland, Oregon, region who is prosecuting them for rioting last year while refusing to charge left-leaning protesters who have been engaged in often violent demonstrations for months.

Patriot Prayer leader Joey Gibson and Russell Schultz are due in court Oct. 26 for trials stemming from a May Day 2019 riot, The Oregonian reported.

They were among six men accused of inciting a riot between the right-wing group and left-leaning Antifa outside a Northeast Portland pub. The other four pleaded guilty and were sentenced in January.

Gibson and Schultz accused Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt of unfair prosecution in a federal suit filed Friday. The suit claims that Schmidt is selectively prosecuting them based on their political beliefs, because he is refusing to dismiss the single felony riot allegation against them in light of his new policy.

Schmidt announced last month that his office wouldn’t pursue riot charges against most of the hundreds of people who have been arrested in Portland protests in recent months. He specifically said rioting charges would not be prosecuted unless accompanied by another crime.

Not mentioned in the article is the fact that Patriot Prayer never actually set anything on fire, never smashed windows, never destroyed any statues and never defaced any property. BLM rioters have done all these things, and few (if any) of them were prosecuted.

This case will show us if there is still justice in this country. Personally, I don’t have much faith in the courts when it comes to matters such as these.

In the meantime, we can take satisfaction that Oregon Governor Kate Brown’s intended actions against the Proud Boys, where she deputized over 50 Oregon police officers as federal agents, specifically to prosecute conservative activists, has backfired against her and her buddy, Portland mayor Ted Wheeler. From The Daily Wire:

The United States Attorney for Oregon, Billy Williams, said Wednesday that the Oregon State Police will remain federal deputies, despite Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler’s pleas.

Mayor Wheeler asked the U.S. Attorney’s office and the Department of Homeland Security to rescind the federal designation earlier this week, well before the designation is due to expire, out of concern that federal deputies could charge Portland’s protesters with federal crimes for assaulting officers, attacking federal buildings, and fomenting unrest.

The mayor’s office issued a statement noting that they’d “asked the U.S. Attorney’s office to withdraw the designation.”

“A key feature of the designation is that anyone who assaults a federally deputized official could be subject to federal charges,” the statement added, per Oregon Live. “Fortunately, I am confident the Multnomah County District Attorney will continue to prosecute anyone who assaults or otherwise harms police officers or others.”

It would be satisfying if the deputized agents ended up arresting Antifa/BLM activists instead of the intended (conservative) targets.

Posted in politics, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Trump condemns Proud Boys. God afflicts him with CCP Virus

Under pressure, President Trump stated Thursday:

I condemn all white supremacists, I condemn the Proud Boys. I don’t know much about the Proud Boys but I condemn that

Immediately after doing so, Trump was stricken with the CCP Virus.

At first, I was alarmed; the only good that might come of this is that Trump might not be able to participate in future debates – thus avoiding further making an idiot of himself.

I still am alarmed, not that I care about Trump personally. A real man would have refused to condemn Proud Boys – either on the grounds that he “doesn’t know much about them,” or on the grounds that they’re actually not a hateful, dangerous, group.

I’ve previously pointed out that Proud Boys is not a white-advocacy group. They’re a conservative group. But they’re like the canary in a coal mine. If Proud Boys is subject to official condemnation, then actual white-advocates certainly are.

That Trump is willing to condemn white-advocacy (AKA “white-supremacy”) confirms that he is our enemy – but less of an enemy than Biden. Therefore, in a desperate bid to preserve some of our liberties, I’ll be voting Trump, if he’s still alive during the election.

The First and Second Amendments are in danger, and today I’ll be writing about the Second Amendment.

We’re living in dangerous times. Roving mobs disrupt our lives, leaving destroyed businesses, toppled monuments and damaged infrastructure in their wake. Mobs are dangerous, but the corporate media continues to describe them as “peaceful protesters.” This is bad – but even worse is the fact that The Law doesn’t appear to recognize the inherent danger that mobs present.

A mob isn’t simply a collection of individuals. From How Stuff Works:

When a group of people has assembled because they’re emotional and angry about something, it only takes one act of violence to whip the crowd into a fury. Others will follow the initial rioter’s lead and begin destroying property or hurting people. A lot of research has been conducted into the mindset of a violent mob. Being part of a group can destroy people’s inhibitions, making them do things they’d never otherwise do. They lose their individual values and principles and adopt the group’s principles, which, during a riot, are usually to cause destruction and avoid detection. This standard can seem to be a just and righteous one, since the mobs assembled after an act of perceived inequality or unfairness, and the communal emotion can make the cause seem even more important. Being in the midst of a mob can be exciting and powerful, and it can make people feel invisible — they are part of a huge group, and they won’t be detected or held responsible for their actions.

Having once been attacked by a mob, I can speak of this with some authority. But, as I’ve said, The Law doesn’t seem to acknowledge the inherent danger of mobs, and the media has neglected its duty to inform. As a result, citizens are sometimes confronted with situations they are unfamiliar with, uninformed about, and unsure how to correctly react. This is a recipe for disaster.

In July, 2016, conservative journalist Aaron Strickland was confronted with a mob in Portland, Oregon. Fearing for his safety, he brandished his gun and pointed it at the advancing “protesters.” He was later found guilty, by a judge, of several felonies and sentenced to several years in prison, where he remains. He will be eligible for parole next year.

In my opinion, this was not a clear-cut case, and Strickland could have handled the situation better; just because you happen to have a gun doesn’t mean the gun should be your default solution in such situations; I think bear spray would have been better in this situation, and he knew, in advance, what he was getting into. However, we have the benefit of hindsight, and the mob was clearly advancing upon him. That’s a frightening state of affairs, and The Law should take this into account. Private citizens should be given the benefit of the doubt when dealing with mobs, which are inherently dangerous. When mobs are involved, there needs to be more leniency for gun-owners.

On May 30th of this year, Jake Gardner shot a rioter who was (allegedly) attacking him at his business. Having moved to Oregon, Gardner recently took his own life. From reclaim the net:

38-year-old Jake Gardner, who had suffered two traumatic brain injuries after serving as a Marine in Iraq, was allegedly confronted by a mob at his Hive Bar in downtown Omaha. According to prosecutors, after being pinned to the ground, Gardner fired warning shots and then got involved in a scuffle with 22-year-old James Scurlock, in which Schurlock was shot dead…

A GoFundMe for both Scurlock and Gardner was set up by supporters – the first for the family of Scurlock and the second for Gardner’s defense fund as reports said Gardner acted in self-defense.

However, while Scurlock’s GoFundMe campaigns went on to raise over $275,000, the platform shut down Gardner’s campaigns after complaints from activists, cutting his ability to fundraise for his legal defense…

In June, prosecutors were clear that Gardner acted in self-defense – such that, on June 1, Donald Kleine, the Douglas County attorney, made the decision not to bring a case against Gardner.

However, after much backlash online, in a press conference this week, while not giving details of any newly-uncovered evidence, special prosecutor Fredrick Franklin said that a grand jury was now “able to understand that Jake Gardner was threatening the use of deadly force in the absence of being threatened with a concomitant deadly force by James Scurlock or anyone who was associated with him,” and chose to prosecute for manslaughter, the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, attempted assault, and terroristic threats.

Faced with what was expected to be a $1 million bail, Gardner didn’t immediately turn himself in when an arrest warrant was signed on Friday as he was out of the state.

“The grand jury indictment was a shock to him,” Gardner’s attorney, Stuart Dorner said today at a press conference. “He was really shook up.”

Dorner said Gardner planned to return from around the Portland area on Sunday evening.

On Sunday evening, police in Hillsboro, Oregon, confirmed that Gardner was found dead outside a medical clinic, with wounds confirmed to be “by his own hand.”

I wasn’t there, and I don’t know exactly what transpired, but it speaks volumes about our society that a man of little means, denied the ability to earn a living, is not even permitted to collect charity for his own defense – a defense that only became necessary because of political pressure by a mob.

On June 28th of this year, Mark and Patricia McCloskey were confronted by a mob in front of their home in St. Louis. From BBC:

About two hours into the demonstration on Kingshighway, the marchers began making their way towards Krewson’s home. They walked north and made a left toward a street called Portland Place, which is blocked at both ends with imposing stone and wrought iron gates. Signs marked “Private Property” are posted at either end.
One of the houses on Portland Place is a spectacular, $1.15m (£880,730) Renaissance-style palazzo, built by an Anheuser-Busch beer fortune heiress in the early 1900s. This is the home of husband and wife Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who are both personal injury lawyers.
The confrontation

How it all began has been hotly contested. Mark McCloskey in one subsequent media interview said the protesters “smashed down” the gate.

“As soon as I said the words ‘private property,’ it seemed to enrage them,” he told Fox News “I ran in, got my rifle. I started standing on the wing of the patio saying, ‘Private property! Get out! Get out of here!’ They kept pouring in. That seemed to make them want to come forward.”…

On 10 July, city police searched and seized both of the guns from the couple. About a month later, St Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner charged both with “unlawful use of a weapon”, which is a felony. The complaint said that both had displayed their semi-automatic weapons “readily capable of lethal use, in an angry or threatening manner”.

The McCloskeys are well to do, and the both President Trump and Missouri governor Mike Parson have publicly defended the McCloskeys, stating that they were within their rights according to The Castle Doctrine.

On August 22nd of this year, Proud Boy Alan James Swinney was confronted by a BLM mob, one of whom (allegedly) threatened him with a sharp object. In response, Swinney pulled out his gun. From the New York Post:

A member of the far-right group the Proud Boys was arrested Wednesday for pointing a gun at rivals during clashes in Portland, Oregon, a report said.

The suspect, 50-year-old Alan Swinney, was hit with assault and several weapons charges for allegedly training a revolver on anti-fascist protesters during the clashes on Aug. 22, according to Oregon Public Broadcasting.

The far-right and leftist groups beat one another with bats, slugged each other and fired paintballs during the melee that day, according to the report.

Swinney remains incarcerated at the Multnomah County Jail. Eight charges have been filed against him. A short video clip of the incident is available, but it’s very short, and it’s difficult to ascertain what happened. Initially, Swinney was not charged; it’s possible that prosecutors were coerced into filing charges by political pressure groups (AKA BLM).

On August 25th of this year, Kyle Rittenhouse went to Kenosha to help protect businesses and to provide first aid if needed. From WPR.org:

Rittenhouse traveled to Kenosha on Aug. 25, two days after Kenosha police shot Jacob Blake, a Black man, in the back multiple times. The city had erupted into protest following Blake’s shooting, and multiple buildings had been burned.

Rittenhouse, a lifeguard and vocal supporter of police, said he was there to protect a local business and offer medical help if needed. He walked through the crowd that night with an AR-15 rifle strapped to his chest.

What happened that night is disputed, but the #FightBack Foundation has released a dramatic video that tells Rittenhouse’s side of the story. It’s a compilation of cell phone footage from the night of the shootings.

When it was over, 2 men were dead, and one was injured. From the videos, it appears that Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense, and he did peacefully turn himself in to the police. Nevertheless, he was arrested and charged with first degree murder. The Gofundme page, set up for his defense, was removed. Rittenhouse’s attorney, Lin Wood had his Twitter account suspended.

On September 18th of this year, Jim Geisler was confronted by a mob in Louisville, Kentucky. From The Blaze:

Louisville Metro Police declined to file charges against the man despite the demands from many on social media, and posted an explanation on its Facebook page.


“Yesterday, during the protest activity in the Hurstbourne/Shelbyville Rd area, individuals were observed surrounding and inflicting damage on a vehicle at the traffic light on Hurstbourne Pkwy. During this event, a woman who was participating in the protest pointed a handgun at the occupant of the vehicle, placing him and others in extreme danger,” the post read.


“Fortunately, officers were able to move the crowd away and took her into custody a short time later without incident,” the post added.

In this case, it was the “protester” who was charged, and the motorist was not charged – but he still lost his job:

The man was eventually identified as Jim Geisler and he lost his job at American Air Filter Co., which released a statement explaining the decision.

“AAF Flanders supports the right to peacefully assemble as an expression of free speech,” said a spokesperson for the company.

“In our view, the actions of this individual show poor judgment and are inconsistent with the core values of our company,” the spokesperson added. “As such, this individual is no longer with the company.”

What can we learn from all this? That the Establishment Left, realizing it cannot overturn the Second Amendment, has found a way to circumvent it. By sending a clear message that those who use, or even brandish, their weapons against black criminals or “peaceful protesters” will forfeit their freedom and fortune, they’ve essentially nullified the primary purpose of bearing arms.

Yes, you’re welcome to bear arms; we will not prevent you from doing so – but God help you if you actually use them to defend yourself against our pet demographics.

Things will only get worse if Biden is elected. Therefore, I encourage all of y’all to hold your noses and vote for Trump.

Posted in guns and gun-control, politics, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 2 Comments

Creating crime through criminal laws

It’s illegal to discriminate in hiring based on race or gender. From Oregon.gov:

Oregon law protects you from discrimination based on your sex and sexual orientation, including gender identity.

It’s illegal for your employer, public businesses, places of housing, or other “public accommodations” to treat you differently because of your sex, sexual orientation, or gender.

You are protected both at work and outside of work.

Federal civil rights laws and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission also protect you from discrimination based on sex, gender identity including transgender status, or sexual orientation.

But it’s perfectly legal, even required, for the government to discriminate against white people and against men. Yes, some people are more equal than others.

The City of Portland preferentially awards contracts to businesses that are not owned by men, and are not owned by white people… but the powers-that-be don’t like to phrase it that way; instead, they prefer to describe as giving…

… preference to “disadvantaged businesses.” That category includes businesses owned by Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, women and others who have historically had less access to lucrative government contracts.

“Historically” is such a loaded term. Everything that happened in the past is “historical.” Also, as Orwell once said, Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

But enough about the past. What about the present? Presently, a Portland business is being prosecuted for (allegedly) trying to circumvent laws that discriminate against men. From OregonLive:

Portland fines contractors for allegedly creating ‘front company’ to certify as woman-owned business

The City of Portland said Wednesday it will fine the owners of a painting contractor $20,000 for allegedly creating a “front company” to qualify as a woman-owned business. The city is accusing the business, Portland Coatings, of receiving more than $1 million in contracts while falsely claiming to be owned by a woman.

Portland had been investigating Terezia Nyland and her husband, Michael, since 2017, after an unspecified tip to the city’s ombudsman office. The city said Portland Coatings’ address is actually the loading dock for a business Michael Nyland owns, Williamsen & Bleid.

Portland taxpayers shouldn’t be concerned about the whether a man or a woman owns the painting company; they should only care about whether or not they’re getting good value for their money. But when preferential treatment, based on gender or race, is written into law, it’s inevitable that taxpayers will end up paying more.

Meanwhile, in Hawaii, a bona fide minority-owned business, having (apparently) won its government contracts through such discriminatory practices, has been caught doing some shady business. From The Civil Beat:

A politically connected defense contractor in Hawaii was arrested and charged Wednesday by the U.S. Justice Department for allegedly bilking the federal government out of $12.8 million in coronavirus relief aid meant to help small businesses.

Martin Kao, 47, is the CEO of Martin Defense Group, formerly known as Navatek LLC, a Honolulu-based company that over the years has received millions of dollars in federal contracts, primarily to design state-of-the-art ship hulls for the U.S. Navy.

He’s charged with bank fraud and money laundering for falsifying loan applications for the Paycheck Protection Program that was created by Congress as part of the $2 trillion CARES Act meant to stave off financial ruin for individuals and businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic…

Kao was taken into custody Wednesday. The U.S. Attorney’s Office filed a motion to hold him without bail saying he is a serious flight risk.

The article doesn’t go into specifics, but we can surmise that the reason Kao is a ” serious flight risk” is that he has strong connections to a foreign country – probably somewhere in Asia. Yes, this is just a wild guess on my part.

Another detail that is omitted is that Navatek was considered a “minority-owned business.” From govtribe.com we can garner this information:

There’s no way to know if Navatek would have acquired its lucrative government contracts had it not been a “minority-owned business,” but these two cases give us a snapshot of the kind of perverse “justice” and corruption that come with gender/race-based government policies. In both cases, it’s mainly innocent people who suffer as a result of such policies.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Presidential Debate

After watching most of the Trump-Biden debate on Fox YouTube, it seems to me that I might as well have watched Idiocracy again. Both Trump and Biden came across as morons.

Trump was painful to watch, because he didn’t seem capable of allowing his opponent to speak without interruption. I really think that the moderator should have a “Mute” button, which he can use when somebody continues to speak out of turn.

Biden was painful to watch, especially when he was talking about healthcare, because it’s obvious that he was lying. I kept having flashbacks of Obama saying, “if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.” We all saw how that turned out.

The moderator was painful to watch because he presented, as articles of faith, that a) there’s systematic racism against blacks, b) whites have no right to promote their own ethnic interests, and c) human activities are a major contributor to climate-change.

As an example of “white-supremacy,” the moderator cited Proud Boys. The ignorance is astounding.

Biden kept asking if he could get his _______ seconds back. I want to know if I can have my hour and a half back – because it was a waste of time, and psychologically torturous to watch.

Posted in politics | 2 Comments

CNN: Reporting hate where there is none

In anticipation of a Proud Boys rally in Portland, Oregon governor Kate Brown issued an emergency executive order, and deputized 50 officers to keep the peace. From Newsweek:

About 50 Portland, Oregon, police officers will be deputized as federal marshals ahead of Saturday’s Proud Boys rally, enabling federal prosecutors to potentially bring federal charges upon those arrested.

Officers assigned to the specialized crowd control teams in the Portland Police Bureau (PPB) will be deputized early Saturday morning, Oregon State Police (OSP) Supt. Travis Hampton told The Oregonian/OregonLive. Governor Kate Brown tapped Hampton to lead police response with Multonmah County Sheriff Mike Reese under an emergency executive order, OregonLive reported.

Hampton asked the U.S. Marshals Service to grant the officers in the special squad federal powers. “Portland officers have been serving on the front lines of nightly protests for months, sustaining injuries and encountering unspeakable violence,” he said. “If I am to send them into harm’s way this weekend, on my authority, I’m going to ensure they have all the protections and authority of OSP troopers.”

The article makes it seem like the threat of violence is from the Proud Boys, and that they’re guilty of “unspeakable violence.” But it wasn’t Proud Boys who threw Molotov cocktails at the police, it wasn’t Proud Boys who set fire to the Justice Center, and it wasn’t Proud Boys who illegally blocked streets, destroyed businesses and defaced public property for over 100 nights straight. No, that sort of “unspeakable violence” was perpetrated by BLM activists.

I attended today’s rally at Delta Park, and it was a jolly, festive, atmosphere. There was no hate to be seen. Instead, I witnessed several hundred flag-waving patriots making speeches, supporting Trump, playing music, selling t-shirts and hats, and overall having a good time.

The absence of Antifa/BLM meant that peace reigned. Actually, there was one man with a BLM banner. He was surrounded by Proud Boys and other conservatives for a couple of hours. He wasn’t wearing armor or a helmet or a gas mask, and he didn’t bother carrying a shield. It’s almost like he somehow KNEW that he wasn’t going to be in any danger… except for the fact that some folks spoke to him, and (as we’re told) words can be “violence.” If the situation were reversed, and a conservative showed up at a BLM rally, things would likely end differently.

CNN made sure to remind us that the SPLC considers Proud Boys to be a “hate group”:

Proud Boys is far-right extremist organization that has been designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

… and, to emphasize this, CNN used the following photo to characterize the event:

Members of the Proud Boys and other right-wing demonstrators rally on Saturday, Sept. 26, 2020, in Portland, Ore. (AP Photo/John Locher)

Yes, the “reporter” probably took hundreds of photos, and made sure to pick the one that seemed to depict the most hate. People who weren’t there, but saw this photo, might believe that the attendees were shrieking for the lynching of negroes and Jews. Perhaps they were getting ready to burn a cross.

Many reporters were in attendance, almost enough to make their own rally. I spoke with one of them. He worked for BBC, and was from Australia. Other reporters interviewed Proud Boys members, and it looked like they were sympathetic, and that they were absorbing the information they were given.

I’m skeptical. Perhaps some of them realize that conservatives aren’t the bad guys in the Portland scene – but this doesn’t mean they’re at liberty to write the truth in their respective papers; they don’t want to lose their jobs. It’s just as likely that they put on a friendly facade in order to gain more material.

As for the police, the only ones I saw were parked outside the rally, on the street. They seem to have known that, as long as BLM/Antifa was kept out, things would be peaceful.

CNN reported that there were about 1000 people at the Proud Boys rally. My impression was that it was a bit more than that; there were several concentrations of people, with several groups guarding the peripheries in case Antifa decided to attack.

Local TV channel KGW reported that “several thousand” were present. Reportedly, there was an assault during the rally. I know nothing about it, and I did arrive an hour late.

I’m still learning how to use my bodycam effectively. Otherwise I would include a video here. But, at least when I was there, nothing exciting happened.

Posted in activism, examples of propaganda | 1 Comment

Pakistan’s Prime Minister condemns “Islamophobia”

In 2015 Muslims murdered 12 journalists in France:

Fourteen people are on trial in France over the deadly attack on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015.Most of the alleged accomplices are in court in Paris, but three are being tried in absentia.They are accused of helping the militant Islamist attackers who shot dead 12 people in and around Charlie Hebdo’s Paris office in January 2015.In a related attack, a third gunman shot dead a policewoman, then attacked a Jewish store, killing four people.The 17 victims were killed over a period of three days. All three attackers were killed by police. The killings marked the beginning of a wave of jihadist attacks across France that left more than 250 people dead.

Currently, 14 suspects are on trial in France. Charlie Hebdo, in an act of courage and defiance, has republished the cartoons that triggered the massacre five years ago.

I won’t go so far as to say that ALL Muslims fly into a murderous rage when confronted with cartoons of their prophet, but they do in sufficient numbers to warrant safety concerns whenever infidels dare to publish such images.

If it were only a fringe group of Muslims who are deeply angered by such images, then the prime minister of Pakistan (officially known as “The Islamic Republic of Pakistan”) wouldn’t feel the need to condemn the republication of these cartoons. From France24:

Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan on Friday condemned the fresh publication of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed by a French satirical weekly, urging UN efforts against what he called rising Islamophobia.

Addressing the UN General Assembly in a prerecorded message, Khan said that rising global nationalism has “accentuated Islamophobia” and said that Muslims “continue to be targeted with impunity in many countries.”

“Incidents in Europe including republication of blasphemous sketches by Charlie Hebdo are recent examples,” Khan said.

“We stress that willful provocations and incitement to hate and violence must be universally outlawed.

It’s likely that Prime Minister Imran Khan doesn’t personally care about such cartoons. Perhaps he felt politically pressured into issuing such a statement. Perhaps he even feared for his life, should he fail to condemn the cartoons. Either way, it doesn’t reflect well on Islam that the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is more concerned about the publication of some cartoons than the fact that Muslims are so easily provoked, and have murdered people, over such trivial matters as cartoons.

The very fact that such cartoons can incite Muslims to commit murder is evidence enough that the fear of Islam is not unreasonable – and that, therefore, it is not a “phobia.”

Also, it takes a lot of nerve for Khan to condemn cartoons in France as “Islamophobic” while Hindu girls continue to be abducted, and forcibly converted to Islam, in Pakistan:

Would he describe the parents of those poor girls as “Islamophobic” as well?

Posted in Muslims | 4 Comments

“Defund the Police” assignments being given in grade school

I just found this on Quora and had to share it with y’all:

What made you feel disgusted today?

So I was busy studying for my exam in SDSU, when I got a message from one of my martial art classmates.

She is in 7th grade, and I dare say she’s my friend because we talk alot and i usualy help her. But anyway, she messaged me saying that she needed my help.

I said, sure. Tell me what do you need help on. I thought it would be like math or something.

She said she needed help…. because she needed to take a defund the police quiz.

When I read this, I was like

I was thinking she wasnt serious. How ridiculous can this be?

I actually thought she was joking. Then, she sent me these pictures.

Now, I may have gotten political, but I would never. EVER. try to force politics into a learning environment or on my friends or family.

What didnt disgust me was that the teacher sent the defund the police quiz. What disgusted me was that the teacher tried forcing politics, when the students are 7th graders.

Seventh graders should not be learning about politics. They should be enjoying their childhoods. They shouldnt be forced to learn politics.

When I was a seventh grader, I was busy playing with my cousins and reading spider man comics.

The problem with politics is that its ALWAYS going to be divisive. I literally got into politics during the summer, and I REGRETTED it. I wish I was ignorant and did not know about politics. Even though I am more informed about what goes on, I wished I did not get more political (which is ironic, considering I am writing a political answer)…

Posted in examples of propaganda, politics | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Two more white women “use blackness”

We can add a couple more names to the list of white women who have used black privilege to their advantage.

From The Indy Star:

Satchuel Cole, leader in the fight for racial equality in Indianapolis, lied about own race

“Friends, I need to take accountability for my actions and the harm that I have done. My deception and lies have hurt those I care most about. I have taken up space as a Black person while knowing I am white. I have used Blackness when it was not mine to use. I have asked for support and energy as a Black person. I have caused harm to the city, friends and the work that I held so dear,” Cole posted on a Facebook page under the name Satch Paige.

And we read about yet another one, also a gender-confused female, at The Post Millennial:

White grad student pretending to be black apologizes and resigns from teaching position

As first reported by the Wisconsin State Journal, CV Vitolo-Haddad, whose non-binary pronouns are “they” and “them,” admitted to misrepresenting their race. The academic is Southern Italian and Sicilian, not black or Latino as they’ve previously purported.

As first reported by the Wisconsin State Journal, CV Vitolo-Haddad, whose non-binary pronouns are “they” and “them,” admitted to misrepresenting their race. The academic is Southern Italian and Sicilian, not black or Latino as they’ve previously purported.

“In trying to make sense of my experiences with race, I grossly misstepped,” Vitolo-Haddad wrote in a September 8 article on the blogging platform Medium. “I went along with however people saw me. I over-identified with unreliable and unproven family history and latched onto anything I remembered growing up.”

Add these two names to Rachel Dolezal and Jessica Krug, and we have a phenomenon that needs explaining.

If you type “pretending to be black” into the Google search bar, you’ll get over 27 million results. If you type in “pretending to be white,” you’ll get 287 million results – except that almost all of those results (at least on the first few pages) are of white people pretending to be black; there’s not a single example, that I could find, of a black person pretending to be white.

If white-privilege is so pervasive, we’d expect the opposite. Also, if you read Cole’s quote above, you ‘ll see that she refers to “using blackness.” How can one “use” something that is only a liability?

These women, all of whom have psychological issues, are living proof that black privilege is real. White privilege is not.

That being said, I don’t blame them for this particular sin. How many Jews pretended to be gentile in Nazi Germany? If you could pass as white in apartheid South Africa, wouldn’t you do so? To be white in today’s America is to belong to the lowest caste, and yes, this can be offset with money or status.

I would encourage as many white people as possible to pretend to be black. Doing so might have the effect of eroding the unjust caste system we now have in place.

Posted in Africa and blacks, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Diversity reaches small-town America

According to MSN News:

Police in northeast Ohio are searching for a gunman who walked into a home in the middle of the night and opened fire, killing a 4-year-old child and wounding four adults, authorities said.

The boy was in the living room just before 2 a.m. Monday when the shooter burst into the house and fired multiple rounds, according to police. Two women, including the child’s mother, were shot in the legs while two men who were also home sustained more serious gunshot wounds and were hospitalized in critical condition, police said.

Their exact relationship and a motive for the shooting remain under investigation. The victims told police they did not know the shooter.

The incident happened in Struthers, a small city near the Pennsylvania border.

He shot one man in the head and the other in the back, Roddy told reporters at a news conference Monday. The women were in stable condition and the boy died in his mother’s arms, the chief said…

The suspect was described as a young, thin and light-skinned black man, but it was not clear if he fled in a car, local news outlet WKBN reported.

This was the first homicide in Struthers since 2014, according to the station.

Here’s is the 4 year old white boy who was murdered by the black man:

Here are the four adult victims:

We don’t know much about the victims, except that it appears the young women went out of their way to date black men. What an original, and progressive, idea!

Here are the demographics of Struthers:

According to the most recent ACS, the racial composition of Struthers was:

  • White: 94.19%
  • Two or more races: 2.54%
  • Black or African American: 2.28%
  • Other race: 0.69%
  • Asian: 0.31%
  • Native American: 0.00%
  • Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander: 0.00%

Will the people of Struthers take note of the fact that they hadn’t had a murder since 2014, and that it was a black man who brought bloodshed to their doorsteps?

4 year-old Rowan Sweeney will have plenty of company in Heaven. It wasn’t that long ago that a 5 year old white boy was executed in front of his parents by another black man.

Hardly a day passes when we don’t read of a new atrocity committed against whites by blacks – and at the same time, we’re told that blacks are the true victims. If there’s one thing the BLM movement is right about, it’s that “Silence is Violence.” This is true, but the only crimes the corporate media is silent about is black-on-white crimes. It would be difficult to characterize the reactions, after black men are shot by police, as “silence.”

Even if it were only silence that the corporate media was guilty of, it should be held accountable. How much more so when it actively encourages violence against whites by cultivating hatred against us.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment