White genocide

Posted on May 20, 2011 by jewamongyou

I had a difficult day at work so I’m in the mood for a fight.  On second thought, I’ll settle for a debate and today’s victim will be Robert Lindsay.  Last month he published a post called “More Nonsense About ‘White Genocide‘”.  In a nutshell, his arguments are that:
1) Whites will not become extinct because not all of them will intermarry with the non-white multitudes that are brought to their shores.
2) “No one cares much about genetic “extinction” of various “pure” ethnic groups via voluntary intermarriage. Only lunatics like you guys. Races are not stable entities. They are changing all the time. It’s been that way all down through time.”
3)  “There have been efforts to “breed out” various “pure” races in the past via flooding with immigration and encouraging intermarriage, but no one cares much about it, except that it had a racist ideology. See the “Whitening” project in Brazil for instance.”
My response, henceforth directed toward Mr. Lindsay, is that nobody, not even the most extreme pro-white activist, can control whom his descendants will breed with over time.  He can have a powerful influence upon his children and maybe even upon his grandchildren but, sooner or later, he will die and his passion and influence will wane.  The only way to prevent the dilution of a population is for that population to have its own territory or, at least, its own community.  It must have its own schools, businesses, institutions and ideology*.  Jews and the Parsi (diaspora Persians in India) are good examples.  As it stands, governments prohibit whites from having their own schools; they are forced to allow their children to mix with other races (either explicitly or through financial pressure).  Businesses are not allowed to be strictly white and, as a practical matter, neither are most institutions.
It is not necessary for all whites to intermarry in one or two generations; under the above circumstances, all whites will eventually intermarry and the indigenous peoples of Europe will be no more.
It is not necessary to believe that whites are a pure race in order to recognize the validity of their existence.  Is there any proof that the Tasmanians were a “pure race”?  I doubt it – and yet many people grieve over their extinction.  I have already discussed the definition of “white” elsewhere.  Should Native American tribes allow anybody to join them, whether or not they have any Native American blood?  Many would say “no”.  If this were the case, those tribes would cease being tribes; instead, they would be religions, ideologies, social clubs or cults.
As for “voluntary intermarriage”.  One could argue that each individual case of miscegenation is “voluntary” but, taken as a whole, the vast conspiracy of propaganda and intense pressure (from birth to grave) for white girls and women to date blacks – and, to a lesser extent, for Asian girls and women to date whites – greatly reduces the “voluntary” element here.  “Grooming” would be a better word.  White girls are groomed to date blacks and this is no more voluntary than the grooming of girls to be prostitutes or house slaves.  The results of conditioning from a tender age are not “voluntary”.  The weak-minded of each generation will succumb.  The parents did not send their children to mixed schools voluntarily either.  Witness the opposition to desegregation in the South.  Their children were mixed at the point of a gun.
As for no one caring about it, on the face of it, this is clearly false.  Many people do care about it.  I care about it and so do most readers of this blog.  A recent survey revealed that nearly half of Mississippi Republicans would want miscegenation to be illegal.  One would assume that they care about it.  Armand Leroi cares about the survival of the negritos.  In any event, even if it were true that “no one” cared about it, this does not mean that we should not care about it.  Our priorities and opinions should not be subject to majority rule.  You, of all people Mr. Lindsay, should appreciate this.  After all, “no one” believes that Bigfoot exists – and yet you do.  And I would never try to debate your Bigfoot claims with such an argument.
You are right that races are not stable entities.  They ebb and flow and change all the time – but we ask that government allow nature to take its own course in this matter.  Species also come and go.  They become extinct all the time, even without the help of humans.  And yet we consider the eradication of a species (even subspecies such as the Spotted Owl) to be a great crime.  I have already contrasted the concern over a race of ducks with the lack of concern over races of men.
You claim that no one cares about efforts to swamp “pure” races in the past with immigrants in order to eradicate them “except that it had a racist ideology”.  I would say that current policies toward traditionally white nations are based upon “racist ideologies”.  We need not guess the intentions of those in power toward the white race; they have been quite vocal about their disdain toward it.  The MSM is vocal about it.  All Western institutions, that hold any measure of clout, are openly anti-white.  They make no secret about it.  What they want is a world either without whites at all, or one in which whites hold no power – even over their own destiny.  You read Amren so surely you are aware of this.
As the evil plans of those in power become ever more obvious, more and more people do care about it.
Respectfully yours,
Jewamongyou
*Though whites do not share a common ideology, they can incorporate a will to survive as a race within their various ideologies.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, immigration/ Hispanics | 31 Comments

What's in a name?

Posted on May 19, 2011 by jewamongyou

Half Sigma recently told us, concerning the name “Brooklyn” for a girl, that…

When I think of Brooklyn, I think of graffiti and traffic and guidos with low-class accents and neighborhoods of black people. This is not something I would want to name my daughter after.

Personally, I think “Brooklyn” sounds about as nice as any other name.  But I spent a few years in Israel and it was there that I got used to the idea that a name is supposed to mean something.  To this day, it seems odd to me that names can be “good” or “bad” or “normal” when they are divorced from any literal meaning.

My guess would be that, among the highly intelligent people who read this blog, most of y’all know the meaning of your names.  You’ve probably taken the time, at some point, to look it up in a dictionary.  But there are very few English names that mean anything at all in modern English.  In fact, I can think of none – unless we count homonyms like “Harry” and “hairy” or “Art(thur)” and “art”.  A visitor from outer space would probably find it odd that English speakers (and speakers of most Western languages) give names to their children that mean absolutely nothing in their native tongues.  Names that appear to be random collections of phonemes.  Indeed, some names really are random collections of phonemes.

It is possible that our perception of “good” names and “bad” names, or “appropriate” names and “inappropriate” names is influenced by associations with words that sound like the name in question.  For example, “Mary” sounds like “merry” but “Mildred” sounds like “mildew”.  More likely, we associate names with historic personalities who also had them or, as in Half Sigma’s example, with places that have them.  When an American hears “Thomas”, he probably thinks of “Thomas Jefferson” or “Thomas Paine” – or maybe his late Uncle Thomas.  In any case, “Thomas” probably draws most of its meaning from the fact that other people had that name in the past.  It is unlikely that many people, when introduced to a man named “Tom” or “Thomas”, wonder if he is a twin (the name “Thomas” is derived from the Aramaic word for “twin”).

In contrast, Semites (and many other language groups, I’m sure) have traditionally given names based on the literal meaning of the word.  We see this in the Bible and Arabs, to some extent, still do this.  Since a person’s nature is not evident until later in life, it was common for one’s name to be changed.  Two of the three Hebrew patriarchs had their names changed in mid-life: Abram (to Abraham) and Jacob (to Israel).  When each one of the tribal founders was born, an explanation is given as to why he was named as he was.  Because Semitic names were given, and often made up, based on words tied to actual events, there was a great wealth of potential names.  In ancient times, and until very recently among Oriental Jews, the name “Ishmael”, for example, was acceptable.  Now, due to its association with Arabs, very few young Jews sport that name.  The (later) Ashkenazi custom, of associating names only with personalities who had them earlier, had prevailed  Many perfectly good Hebrew names are now found only among Arabs while they are shunned by Jews.

When my own children were born, I wanted to give them colorful names, but my (then) wife would have none of that; she insisted on more conventional ones.  I yielded to her will.  After all, she had carried them for nine months.

As for the name choices of inner-city American blacks, my guess is that they are a collective attempt to create a new naming tradition.  They do not consider themselves part of American white culture, yet African culture is almost completely foreign to them, so they draw their names from the fringes of white culture and alter them.  I see nothing wrong with this – but I reserve the right to laugh at them as the need arises.  I wonder if SWPL’s are also trying to carve out their own cultural identity.  Haven’t elite whites, from the Patricians on down, always strove to set themselves apart from the unwashed masses? Be it as it may, let us laugh at them too.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Odds and ends

Posted on May 18, 2011 by jewamongyou

None of the following merit their own post, so I’m throwing them together.
On miscegenation in Europe.  I noticed a few white male/ black female couples.  They were almost all older.  My impression is that many middle-aged white men in Europe can settle for a white woman who is a 2 or a 3 – or he can have a black woman who is a 5 or a 6.  The reason is the large number of black men who prefer white women over their own – just as in the United States.
On other race-realist blogs.  It appears that many of the race-realist blogs (including some that I link to) have fallen upon silent times.  Some of them have not seen a new post in many months.  While I understand the desire to limit one’s posting to high-quality material, there is nothing wrong with saying “hello” to your readers – so we’ll know you’re still alive.
The translation of “The Ashkenazi Revolution”.  I worked on it a bit on the airplane during my travels (I’m that dedicated) and, now that I’m home, I’ve resumed translating a little bit each day.  Currently, I’m tackling one of the most difficult (I hope) chapters; it contains a lot of poetry excerpts.  So, to those of you who look forward to reading it, do not worry.  It is not being neglected.
The weather in Portland is the usual for this time of year: sunny and beautiful during my work days but rainy and miserable on my weekends.  I suspect that the folks at HAARP have got it in for me!

Posted in miscegenation, Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Rembrandt and Escher: Masters of transition

Posted on May 17, 2011 by jewamongyou

I was in Amsterdam for a while and, while there, I visited the rijksmuseum.  What I saw there left a powerful impression upon me.  In the Rijksmuseum one can see, in all their glory, some of the more famous works by Rembrandt and his disciples.  In a sense, it’s a pity that this was the first art I enjoyed during my tour of Europe.  It spoiled me and caused me to view the work of other Renaissance artists as inferior.  Indeed, even the work of Michael Angelo seemed cartoonish in comparison.  I feel privileged to have stood in front of such masterpieces as Nightwatch and The Staalmeesters.  Their immense size, coupled with their incredible quality, left me in awe and I felt as if I was actually there, in the same room as the subjects.
In my view there are two categories of painters: Rembrandt and everybody else – and yes, I realize this is a totally subjective statement.  Others will surely disagree.  The greatness of Rembrandt is widely held to be in his mastery of shadows and light.  For me, this means his mastery of transitions.  While other artists rendered their subjects as distinct from their backgrounds, Rembrandt incorporated them into a smooth transition from the background.  His use of shadows had the effect of attenuating the borders and bringing his work closer to the three dimensions we perceive as reality.
Another artist who specialized in transitions was M.C. Escher.  But his was a different approach.  His transitions take the form of creatures morphing into each other.  Where does the fish end and the bird begin?  The boundary between night and day?  It is hard to tell.  Even up and down lose their meaning.  He had mastered the art of depicting separate realms of reality on the same canvass.    But even as he confounded the borders of up and down and muddled the distinctions between various creatures, his work also emphasizes their contrast.  I have been an admirer of Escher since I was a little boy and my parents had a book of his work on the living room table.
Both Rembrandt and Escher were Dutch.  I am not so sure this is coincidence.  The Netherlands is a land of transition.  It is a land where the boundary between land and sea is always in flux.  Canals crisscross the country and much of the land is reclaimed from the sea.  Every so often, the sea claims it back.  Both Rembrandt and Escher were products of the land that spawned them.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Some thoughts on Europe's graffiti

Posted on May 16, 2011 by jewamongyou

Travelling around Europe, I saw a lot of graffiti.  Other than what I’ve already written, that this is one sign of Europe’s decline, I wanted to share a few thoughts about this.
Firstly I wanted to give credit where credit is due and point out that much of Europe’s graffiti is skillfully done.  Though it is wrong to deface the property of others, there is no denying that some of those graffiti artists are talented.  In fact, at times it is difficult to distinguish publicly commissioned art from graffiti.
Secondly, I do not believe that most of the graffiti is done by immigrants or their children.  Due to the fact that it is found even in the most rural places, it seems likely that most of it is the work of indigenous Europeans.  But here I will adopt the position of Richard London and Richard Smith in “Religion of Macho” and say that those young whites were inspired mainly by Africans.  The mere presence of Africans, and the familiarity of black ghetto culture served as the impetus for graffiti.  Here are a couple of examples that provide some support to this theory – but there are also isolated signs that some graffiti artists are for the preservation of Europe::



Though I may be wrong about the example above, it looks like a swipe at Africans.
If I were in charge of Europe, I would suggest that graffiti-lovers gather their resources and set up large surfaces for the purpose of showcasing their art.  In the meantime, citizens would have the option of using their own surveillance equipment to catch vandals red-handed.  When successful, and after shooting the vandal with a tranquilizer gun and bringing him in, the citizen would be eligible for a cash reward.  The vandals would be subject to corporal punishment and public shaming.  After the first offense, penalties would become more severe.  There would be financial incentives for towns and cities to keep their areas clean of graffiti.

Posted in crime and violence | 17 Comments

Racism: seek and ye shall find it

Posted on May 14, 2011 by jewamongyou

I once again had the misfortune of stumbling upon an abomination from the Oregonian.  So I thought I’d share it with the rest of y’all.  Misery loves company.  This one is from Thursday, May22 and is titled, “A rental market rife with RACISM“.  According to this article:

A survey performed last summer for the city of Portland found discrimination runs rampant in the rental housing sector.  In 50 cases in which the precisely scripted black or Latino person inquired about renting, 32 were found to be discriminated against…
We wonder, meanwhile, why there can’t be a simple, swift administration of punitive fines, something for which the city has no current apparatus in place…
Racism – another form of public threat, incidentally – is ripe for everyday law enforcement.
It isn’t even Portland’s reputation that’s at stake.  It’s Portland’s soul.

I assume that when an editorial lists no author, it is the official position of the newspaper.  Indeed, this sort of drivel fits in very well with the anti-white, socialist attitudes of the Oregonian.
Americans have been conditioned to believe that discrimination is wrong and that laws against it are justified.  After all, nobody likes being discriminated against.  I don’t like being discriminated against.  I don’t like it when I ask a lady out and she rejects me.  That’s discrimination.  It’s no fun when I’m not invited to a party either.  That’s discrimination.  Since the article speaks of “landlords” we can safely assume that it is private property that is spoken of here.  “Private property” means the owner gets to choose to whom he will sell, rent or lease.  This is what it means to own property.  Nobody has the right to dictate that a property owner must sell or rent to certain people or refrain from denying a lease to others.  This is his decision and his alone.  If we live in a society where racial discrimination is frowned upon, then word will get out that certain landlords discriminate on the basis or race and the market will punish them.  There is no need for the heavy hand of the law.
Furthermore, the article never bothers to ask what would motivate somebody to refuse perfectly green money simply because of the race of the prospective renter.  It simply assumes and the only motivation is baseless hate.  My hunch is that the author of this article does not live in a complex where a majority of the tenants are black or Hispanic.  Did any of the researchers even bother to ask the landlords why they preferred white tenants?  I doubt it.  What we have here is a perfect case of prejudice.
Another question the city of Portland (and the Oregonian) do not seem eager to ask is how prevalent is racism against whites?  I would wager that not a single penny was ever spent, by any governmental agency in Oregon, in order to find anti-white racism.  It is not hard to figure out why this might be so:  Government agencies are among the worst discriminators against whites.  While the Oregonian is worried about a few racially conscious landlords discriminating against non-whites, all levels of government are busy systematically discriminating against whites.  Such anti-white discrimination is both legally required and practiced informally.
What is “fair housing”?  Fair housing is when owners of private property are allowed to use their property as they see fit.  It is when people are not forced to live with those they do not wish to live with, otherwise known as “freedom of association”.  Fair housing is when landlords need not fear government agents spying on their preferences in tenants in order to persecute them and torment them later.
I am well aware that there is nothing new in this post; it is just jewamongyou venting.  I’ll have something new for y’all tomorrow.

Posted in examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites | 9 Comments

"He who controls the past…"

Posted on May 13, 2011 by jewamongyou

George Orwell  wrote, in 1984, “He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.”  Our rulers, and their media lapdogs, understand this well.  What is considered “history”, by the hostile elite, tells us what their intentions are for the present and future.
The Oregonian recently ran a front page side article titled, “Oregon history quiz”.  The ostensible purpose of the article is to illustrate how ignorant most Oregonians are of their own history.  In reality, the article is an insidious attempt to reinforce the racial hierarchy of “black-run America” (coinage from Occidental Dissent).  In black-run America, blacks are the Brahmans while whites are untouchables.  Hispanics are of intermediate caste.  As soon as I saw that the Oregonian was publishing a “history quiz” I instinctively knew that at least one of the questions would specifically deal with blacks.   The question topics are:
1)  A politician who supported construction of the Bonneville Dam.
2)  When did Oregonians approve initiative and referendum laws?
3)  Was Oregon the first state to hold a vote-by-mail election?
4)  A pro-slavery governor (of Southern origin) in Oregon 1848.
5)  History of environmentalism in Oregon.
6)  After the flood of 1948, where did the hub of Oregon’s black community temporarily move to?
7)  An Oklahoma Indian tribe that traces its ancestry to Oregon.
As for #7, it is understandable that native American history should be included in our history.  After all, they were the only inhabitants of what is now Oregon for a very long time.  So their inclusion, in our history, needn’t have any political undertones.  But, of the 7 questions, 2 pertain to blacks.  One of them specifically.  There are no questions about the Jews of Oregon, or the Chinese or any other group.  It is not explained why the temporary hub of the “black community” should be of any importance to the non-black citizens of Oregon.
Unfortunately, in the minds of the masses, the MSM controls the past.  Clearly, it is their goal to use the past (or their selective version of it) as a tool to impose slavery upon whites with blacks being their masters and the Chosen People.  I did write a letter to the editor regarding this and I would encourage the rest of y’all to do so as well.  Perhaps, if they hear from enough of us, they will realize how ridiculous their worship of blacks appears to normal people.

Posted in examples of propaganda | 7 Comments

Madagascar, an "African" island part II

Posted on May 12, 2011 by jewamongyou

Robert Lindsay has taken issue with my post about black Africans not being capable of reaching Madagascar even though it is so close to the African coast.  Here are his objections:
1)  There may have been pre-Austronesian people in Madagascar long ago – who got there by boat.
2)  Madagascar is not just a few miles off the coast of Africa.  It is 250 miles away.
3)  Africans of 70,000 years ago colonized the rest of the world by boat so clearly they are capable of such technology.
I don’t buy #3 because there is no evidence that the Africans who left Africa 70,000 years ago were negro nor am I aware of solid evidence they traveled by boat.  But more importantly, the whole “out of Africa” theory is shaky and in serious doubt.
As for #1 and #2, these are valid points worthy of further discussion.
For a while now, the question of the negritos has been bugging me.  The negritos are short-statured, dark-skinned peoples who used to inhabit a vast area from the islands of the Indian Ocean all the way to Japan.  Genetically, they are distinct from African negroes and, by most accounts, their average I.Q. is lower.  Though it has usually been assumed that these small people must have reached the islands by boat, somebody (I lost the link) brought up an interesting point: What about the various animal species that lived on isolated islands?  Did they also build boats in order to get there?  The point is that if we allow for the possibility that animals could have colonized the islands by accidentally floating there on driftwood, then the same possibility exists for humans.  This being said, my gut feeling is that the ancestors of the negritos did arrive by boat and this was before they had evolved to their current small size possibly through insular dwarfism.  It is very likely, in my opinion, that the sea-faring ancestors of the negritos had a higher average I.Q. than their modern descendants.  The same selective forces that brought about small stature would also have brought about smaller brains (the brain is the largest consumer of calories among the organs).  In other words, high I.Q. would have been counter-adaptive on these small islands.  The costs would not have justified the benefits.   But Madagascar is not a small island.  It is huge.  Perhaps these people evolved into negritos on the nearby Comoros islands and then found their way to Madagascar.  Be it as it may, the presence of indigenous people in Madagascar, prior to the arrival of the Austronesians, is not relevant to my point unless it is shown that these people came from Africa.   The negritos are more distant, genetically, from black Africans, than any other group.
As for Madagascar being more than just a few miles off the coast of Africa, I shall concede this point to Mr. Lindsay.  I will even add to it that the Indian Ocean currents favor a trans-Indian Ocean voyage over an Africa to Madagascar voyage.  At the same time, the vast difference in distance between Bornea and Africa to Madagascar should not easily be dismissed.
Robert Lindsay is not exactly a race-realist and certainly not a white-nationalist.  But I like a lot of what he writes and he is a gentleman.  Also, he links to this blog.  So I have added his blog to my own blogroll.

Posted in racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 12 Comments

The tragedy of Madagascar and of Europe

Posted on May 11, 2011 by jewamongyou

My travel adventures have come to an end and it is time to start posting, in earnest, my reflections on what I have seen.  Also, now that I am home, I can start posting some of the many photos I took overseas.  I’ll start with some photos of the original inhabitants of Madagascar,  the lemurs.  I took many photos of them, which include several species (the posted photos have all been reduced in resolution.   If anybody wants the original, high resolution photos, let me know).  I even got some nice videos of them.  They are very interesting animals.
 

Their rival, in beauty, is the chameleon.  I was able to see, and photograph, a few wild ones but they were not as spectacular as the ones I saw in the reptile reserves.

I saw many Baobab trees in Madagascar.  Apparently there is some disagreement as to how to pronounce “Baobab”.  So I ended up using the Malagasy word for just one of the varieties: fumi (pronounced “foomee”) while there.  The bark of the fumi is widely used for housing construction.  After a fumi dies, there is an edible mushroom that grows on it.  I would have tried it but it must be cooked properly or it is poisonous.
One of the things that struck me, after I had time to reflect on the many things I saw in my travels, was the symbolism of the baobab tree versus the cathedrals.  The baobab trees, growing in their natural environment, seem to hold up the heavens.  They seem to say, “we are the pillars of the status quo and we are here to ensure that the world carries on as it always has.

In contrast, the cathedrals of Europe – though they resemble huge trees or forests – seem to say, “we strive to pierce the heavens and defy gravity, even nature itself as we test the limits of what humans can build.”  Cathedrals are, in my mind, the baobabs of Europe.  And, even though the baobabs do not contain lemurs, the cathedrals do have their own lemurs, so to speak.  From their lofty heights, the gargoyles gaze down upon the masses.  Their own grotesqueness is now dwarfed by what they witness on the streets of Europe but they do, in a way, resemble lemurs.  One wonders if some early explorers, having seen lemurs, provided the inspiration for those gargoyles*.


  

The ambition that drove Europeans to breach the clouds with their cathedrals, also lead them to explore new lands and subjugate their peoples.  Although, in theory, Madagascar gained its independence from France in 1960, it still appears to be a colony.  When confronted with Europeans, even the Malagasy elite must surely have realized how primitive they were in comparison.  To this day, the Malagasy is daily reminded of the paucity of his own heritage, culture and language.  The Malagasy language, though still very much alive, is heavily influenced by French.  It goes without saying that they have many French loan-words.  This is to be expected.  But the influence of French goes well beyond this.  Even the place-names in their own country are often pronounced in the French version.  About half the billboards are in French, as it is considered the language of the elite.  The capitol, Antananarivo, is designed very much like a French city right down to the cobblestone streets.  Many of the street names are in French and many of them commemorate historical French figures or events. Madagascar is still the playground of the French, who flock there for their vacations.   The French make no effort to learn Malagasy because they don’t need to; almost everybody can speak French.  The traditional religions of Madagascar are rapidly retreating in favor of Christianity.  Within a couple of generations, Malagasy rituals and holidays will take the same role that pagan European rituals and holidays take now – surviving only in the shadows and disguised as “Christianity”.
The Malagasy is reminded of the inferiority of his own heritage every time he opens his mouth.  That foreigners can arrive and have their pick of Malagasy women is also a relic of the colonial mentality.  There is a general lack of national esteem and and their leaders, though they provide security and order, do not seem to be taking the nation in any particular direction as far as I could tell.  It appears as if the Malagasy must make a choice: become modern and relinquish almost all of his heritage or retain his heritage and remain primitive.  What they need is a dynamic and distinctive Malagasy culture that is geared toward the future.  This is difficult when 18 ethnic groups, each with its own traditions, inhabit the island.

In the end, the ambitions and ingenuity of the Europeans broke through the natural barriers of nature, the barriers of distance and the oceans.  For a while, Europe was able to maintain control over the forces it had unleashed but it was inevitable that the genie, once let out of the bottle, would become its own master.  Now it is Europe that is being colonized.  Over time, the cathedrals will crumble – but the baobab will remain.
*By way of analogy, the stained glass windows resemble chameleons in their vivid colors.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 5 Comments

Europe is doomed

Posted on May 7, 2011 by jewamongyou

As some of you may have gathered, I’ve been in Europe the last few days.  I’ve been hopping around with a Europass and staying at cheap hotels and hostels.  I’ve seen many wondrous things here.  Cathedrals, castles, museums and statues.  All of them tributes to the great civilization that created them.  I am pleased to report that Europeans are having babies, at least in the more Germanic parts I’ve been to such as Venice*, Vienna and parts of Germany.

On the other hand, most of Western Europe is clearly in decline.  Graffiti is almost everywhere.  There is widespread miscegenation between young white women and black men.  These couples are everywhere and they make it a point to be seen.  I get the impression that there is not a single town or village, in all of Western Europe, that is free of blacks.  I asked a young man today how many African immigrants should be let into Europe.  I pointed out to him that probably half of Africa would love to come to Europe.  His response was that he doesn’t care; if things got too bad, he would just find someplace else to live – and this man was born here, as were his parents and grandparents and so on.

I thought about the above response and realized that the decline of Europe has its roots in the industrial revolution (and, of course, the French Revolution – but that’s a different topic).  During the industrial revolution, people left the rural areas for the cities in order to work in factories.  They considered this preferable to working the fields all day.  While it is not my place to judge them, a downside to this trend was that people became disconnected from the land.  Previously, most Europeans could point to the land they worked, and the immediate vicinity, and say, “I have worked this land my whole life, as did my father and his father and his father for centuries.  They are all buried here and, some day, so will I.  The fruit of the land is closely linked to my ancestors.  Not only because they worked the same land, but their sweat is mixed in with the soil that yields its fruit.  Thus, my flesh and bones are the flesh and bones of my ancestors.”  When this intimate connection, between ones ancestors, himself and his land, was broken, the stage was set for the destruction of Europe.  Today’s Europeans, at least most of them, feel no great connection with the land.  They feel no great connection with their ancestors.

The fact that most Europeans tolerate the desecration of their monuments and building, through graffiti, is the same mentality that allows them to tolerate the desecration of their women by Africans.  They simply don’t give a damn or, more accurately, not enough of them do.

In the beginning, before the onset of mass immigration, disaster could have been avoided through sensible immigration policies and border controls.  Now that so many have already entered, immigration control would be like locking the barn door after the horses have escaped.  It is far too late for that.  I recently read a statistic that 52% of the babies  born in Paris are black.  I don’t know if this is accurate, but it is easy to believe.  France is well on its way to becoming Europe’s first black country.  While most of the rest of Western Europe is, as far as I can tell, still solidly white, this state of affairs will not continue.  Sub-Saharan Africa is a ticking population time-bomb.  Probably half the men in Africa want nothing more than to move to Europe – and it is clear to me that their main motivation is to get at white women.  They are not hungry in Africa and there are plenty of opportunities in there.  But Europe has put a great big sign over itself stating, “come and get your white women!  Buy one, get one free.”

In a libertarian world, this state of affairs would never have happened.  Central governments would have had no power to (essentially) import millions of aliens into Europe.  There would have been no authority to force such an invasion upon the natives and people would be free to educate their children to be proud of their heritage.  But now that the crime has been committed, the only way Europe can possibly save itself from a slow death would be to take drastic measures.  Nothing short of a Nazi-style racially conscious fascist regime could make a dent in the problem.  The regime would have to deport hundreds of thousand of people, many of them children who were born in Europe and know no other home.  It would have to separate families, fight urban battles and uproot entire communities.  Obviously, such a scenario is not going to happen and this is why I say Europe is doomed.

I wanted to point out that I saw noticeably fewer black male/ white female couples in Italy.  My theory (assuming my observation is correct) is that the Italians have two advantages: a macho culture that allows their men to hold their own in competition for women and the presence of classical art everywhere.  Classical art can train the eye to look for certain ideals.  It shows the viewer what human beauty is supposed to look like.  The classical face is about as different from that of the negro as can be.  When young people are constantly exposed to classical art, their concept of beauty is shaped accordingly and they are less likely to seek a mate whose appearance is at odds with these ideals.  This is a gift their Roman ancestors left them.

I have much more to say about Europe but I wanted to publish this particular post while I’m still in Europe.

*Not that Venice is “Germanic”, but the people are certainly not Mediterranean.

Posted in miscegenation, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 47 Comments