Social Security and Medicare – selling off our nation

Michael Tennant, at New American, tells us that the aging of the Baby Boomer generation spells doom for the American economy because the Federal government cannot possibly keep its obligations without drastically raising taxes or creating so much money that runaway inflation will set in:

For Medicare, says CBS News:

  • The number of people eligible will nearly double from 46 million to 80 million by the time all the boomers reach 65.
  • It’s estimated the cost will grow from $500 billion a year today to $929 billion by 2020.
  • The number of workers supporting each senior will fall.

All of this adds up to one gaping hole in the federal budget. Medicare’s unfunded liability runs as high as $38 trillion over the next 75 years — ObamaCare does nothing to remedy this and will probably worsen it — and the program may go bankrupt by 2017. What to do about it?
The obvious answer, as CBS News points out, is for Americans “to work longer and get used to less government help.” Unfortunately, the reality of the situation has not yet penetrated the skulls of voters, says the report:
Yet Americans still, apparently, want it all. According to a new Associated Press/GfK poll, they don’t want to raise the age for Medicare.
Sixty-one percent favor raising Medicare taxes to avoid cutting Medicare benefits, and a majority of both Democrats and Republicans, young and old, would rather raise taxes than cut benefits.

How high would taxes have to go to keep afloat Medicare — and Social Security, which faces a $5.3 trillion shortfall over the next 75 years and has already begun cashing in the federal IOUs in its phantom trust fund? Former Treasury Department economist Bruce Bartlett calculated in 2009 that “federal income taxes for every taxpayer would have to rise by roughly 81% to pay all of the benefits promised by these programs under current law over and above the payroll tax.”
Are Americans prepared to pay such astronomical amounts of taxes? If they refuse to permit eligibility age increases or benefit reductions as well as the taxes necessary to sustain current benefit levels, there will remain only the options of more debt — almost certainly more than anyone would be willing to lend the U.S. government — and runaway inflation. The outlook — Franklin’s “end of the republic” — is grim indeed.

As I write this, there is one comment on the above article and it states:

Interesting observation on apparent and likely conditions. However, there is much more behind the scenes than meets the eye. A current political social and political problem may finally become the solution. After pressing for responsible family planning for more than a generation, we may soon hear that much greater immigration is needed to pay the support for the baby boomers. And the lost generation of boomers with inadequate children to support them may ditch their race and class for the hope of an easy retirement. Not right by any standard, but surprisingly logical and maybe even possible!

Yes, very logical indeed – if your goal is to replace the population of the U.S. and turn it into a third world country.  The commentator is right that the double whammy of family planning and badly managed mandatory “social security” might force remaining whites to either give up on their elderly or give up their nation.
If this were a game of chess, then those who seek the dispossession of whites would be saying “checkmate”.  But the Japanese are showing that there are other options.  Japan is at the cutting edge of robotic technologies that promise to make life much easier for an aging population.  If we can mass produce robots that can dress us, feed us, call for medical help in an emergency, shop for us or even keep us company – then do we really need to import millions of aliens to do these things for us?  As for the money, I do not believe it is the quantity of money that matters.   Rather, it is the quality of care and, if quality care can be provided cheaply, then we can turn the tables on our enemies.  It is worth mentioning that robots are not likely to abuse their charges, nor to steal from them or neglect them.  They are also not likely to make us feel like aliens in our own lands.

Wakamaru

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, libertarian thought, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 4 Comments

Arabic music versus African music

Warning: I am about to embark on one of my blatantly unscientific rants.
For a long time now, blacks have been considered cool and trendy.  Therefore, many cultural traits associated with blacks are also popular.  Black ghetto slang, dress and gang symbols can be found around the world, adopted by the empty, pathetic masses that consider their own native cultures inferior.  Among more affluent whites, we find African art on their walls, African charities being donated to and African orphans being adopted.
Apparently the same applies to music.  Trashy whites listen to ghetto rap.  Cultured whites will usually listen to white music – but they harbor a symbolic respect for black African music as well.  Once, while visiting a leftist cousin, our conversation drifted to music.  He produced an African CD and I asked to borrow it to see if it was any good; my tastes in music are rather eclectic and I’m always interested in listening to something new.  As it turned out, that African music was some of the worst I had ever heard.
My real passion is for Arabic music.  Not all Arabic music, of course.  There are certain genres I particularly enjoy and others I do not care for.  I do like some Sudanese music as well; it is an interesting blend of traditional African and Arabic elements.  It tends to be more mellow than other Arabic music.  That most white-nationalists hate Arabic music doesn’t bother me in the least.  To each his own.  Also, I did not choose to enjoy Arabic music; it has appealed to me from my earliest memories.  But this I know: Arabic music is superior to most black African music.  Modern Arabic music draws (typically) from Turkish, African, Indian and the various native traditions it absorbed.  Though I cannot prove it, I believe that ancient Egyptian, Babylonian and even Hebrew music live on, to various degrees, in what we now call “Arabic music”.  In contrast, most black African music does not seem to draw from other sources much at all.  Granted, there are some catchy tunes and some impressive beats – but it seems to be very local and tribal.  Hey, I warned you this would not be scientific.
Yet, a Google search for “Arab music festival” yields only 640,000 results.  Only 408.000 for “Arabic music festival”.  In contrast, “African music festival” yields 3,940,000 results.  Lest somebody claim this is because Africa is larger than the Arab world (and there is some overlap, of course), “Asian music festival” yields only 1,060,000 results.  But traditional Asian (excluding Indian) music is even worse than African music.   I suppose one must be raised with it to appreciate it; I certainly do not.  So it does seem as though there is some favoritism toward African music simply because it is African.  African is “the new black” while “Arabic” is associated with various unsavory things – not without justification.
I would like to suggest to Arabs, that they stop beheading people and blowing stuff up – if this is what it takes for their music to gain the recognition it deserves.

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

Corporal punishment is the only answer

American Renaissance recently linked to a dispatch.com article which related how deported illegal aliens return again and again.  Looking through the comments, it was correctly pointed out that the welfare system is largely to blame for this; it is what attracts many of them to begin with.  It was stated that the only way to address the situation is to go after those who hire illegal immigrants.  Some recommended jail time prior to deportation.
Some comments recommended forms of corporal punishment, such as long and uncomfortable sea voyages, tattoos on their hands or even amputation.  My own suggestion was that the first offense would have the culprit be flogged.  Each time after that, the culprit would lose a finger.  My comment was not published – and I completely understand why; this is not the type of image Amren wishes to convey to the world.  There is supposed to be a difference between civilized white-nationalists and Muslim fanatics.
Yes, our image is important but, when it comes right down to it, the only solution that would yield immediate and lasting results is corporal punishment.  Going after companies that hire illegal immigrants would do a lot of good – but many of those criminals work in the underground economy; they work for cash.  The companies they work for might not even be registered with any government agency.  Furthermore, increased supervision of employment practices would necessarily further bloat the leviathan we call “government”.  There are already far too many hurdles, and risks, involved with hiring as it is.  Add to this the fear that one’s company may inadvertently hire an illegal immigrant (which would inflict tremendous loses upon it) – and finding a job will be even more difficult than it already is.  Doing away with the government welfare system would be a great step in the right direction and it would certainly curb illegal immigration – but do not most of those welfare beneficiaries also work under the table?  Whatever income they get from welfare is a bonus to them; it allows them to send more money back home.
In the final analysis, the only real deterrent is actual physical pain.  This is the only thing the criminal mind understands.  If the U.S. were to implement such a policy, the “international community” would be in an uproar.  We would be accused of trampling on “migrant rights” and violating numerous treaties and international laws.  But the U.S. is still powerful enough to thumb its nose at them.  A real leader would respond by saying, “this is what we must do to defend our nation.  If you do not like it, advise your migrants to stay home!”  At the same time, the U.S. would have to live up to its moral responsibilities; it would be required to cease all activities that undermine the economies of third-world countries.  It would also be required to cease all bribes, threats and diplomatic leveraging when it comes to the internal affairs of other countries.  It must no longer force the rest of the world to participate in its insane, and immoral, War on Some Drugs.  If the U.S. were to do all these things, then not only might we save our nation, but we would also maintain the moral high ground.  In the end, the rest of the world would respect us for it.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics | 14 Comments

Happy new year!

Happy new year to all you readers!  If you plan on driving, watch out for other drivers.
By the way, sometimes I neglect checking the spam folder – and once in a while legitimate posts find their way there.  So I apologize to all those to whom this has happened.  But now you know why it sometimes happens that it takes a while for your posts to show up.
Also, sometimes it is quite difficult for me to distinguish between a spam comment and a legitimate one.  If you’ve posted a comment, and you’ve noticed it does not appear, do not hesitate to email me (rhayat10@gmail.com) and I’ll make sure it’s posted – assuming it is an acceptable comment.

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

LGBT rights

A recent alternet article points out that lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transsexuals (LGBT) suffer abuse all over the world.  Though the article did not come out and explicitly say so, it would appear that LGBT’s endure more violations of their rights wherever Africans prevail:

In South Africa, where gay marriage is enshrined in the Constitution, recent years have seen a spike in reported “corrective rapes” against lesbians…
And host country Brazil, home to the largest pride festival in the world (Sao Paolo Pride), is by the numbers one of the most dangerous in the world for LGBT people. Murders of gay men and women and trans people in Brazil have jumped 62% between 2007 and 2009…
Katherine, an activist from Kenya, talked about the music and art events that she helps organize for other lesbians in the country, and the care they have to take to organize discreetly. It was only last week  that the prime minister of Kenya, Raila Odinga, said that all gays and lesbians in the country should be arrested.

Interestingly, the article mentions abuse in the U.S. as well:

In my country—the United States—twenty-nine states still permit discrimination in private employment on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, not to speak of recent violent attacks and the much publicized rash of youth suicides.

But really now!  They are concerned about discrimination in private employment?  What part of  “private” do they not understand?  As for suicides, those are tragic but I do not think they rise to the same level as murder and rape.  I get the impression that U.S. abuses are mentioned merely to make it look like whites are just as guilty of this sort of thing.  Yes, it is true that whites can also be cruel but, as a society, whites have advanced far beyond the point where any politician can call for the arrest of all gays and lesbians, or where massive violence is tolerated against such people.
Wikipedia does have an article specifically dealing with LGBT rights in Africa.  It states, in part:

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) rights in Africa are limited in comparison to other areas of the world, with the BBC estimating that homosexuality is outlawed in 38 African countries. In 13 nations homosexuality is either legal or there are no laws pertaining to it.[1]
In Mauritania, Sudan, and northern Nigeria, homosexuality can be punishable by death. In Uganda, offenders can gain a maximum of a life imprisonment for homosexual acts.
South Africa by far has the most liberal attitudes toward gays and lesbians, with a constitution which guarantees gay and lesbian rights, and legal same-sex marriage.

The article goes on to detail their legal status in each country.  But the fact that lesbians may have legal recognition in South Africa probably offers little comfort to those who are raped or murdered there.  Yes, the laws are on the books, but how much are they followed?  What one would expect from the A.N.C. is exactly what we get when it comes to matters like these.  What would one expect from a nation where over a quarter of its men admit to having raped someone?
Africans in general are not known for their tolerance, either of racial minorities or of sexual minorities.  Add to this the huge influence of Islam on the African continent and the results are powerfully toxic.
LGBT rights do not seem to be much of an issue in Asia, at least as compared to other parts of the world.  They certainly are not an issue in Western Europe – until we take into consideration the dangers posed to them by immigrants from Africa and the Middle East.
As for Eastern Europe, the anti-white media gives the impression that most violence against them is by right-wing nationalists such as neo-nazis.  I suspect that the large Muslim population is more to blame.  Whatever the case may be, I think it is a huge distraction for pro-white movements to focus their attention on sexual minorities.  Let them instead focus their energies on the wholesale invasion of white lands by barbarian hordes.  I wonder if, as Ganges Khan rode through the steppes, conquering all in his path, the Russians were bickering about the sexual orientation of cousin Ivan or sister  Masha – and this is why they melted like butter in the face of the Golden Horde.
I wanted to point out that my definition of “LGBT rights” differs from that of the MSM.  I do not consider it a “right” to adopt children and I think it is wrong for a homosexual couple to do so (in most cases).  Likewise I do not consider it a “right” for them to be officially recognized as “married” or for their lifestyles to be promoted by any public institution, especially schools.  It is a right for them to be left in peace as long as they leave others in peace.

Posted in libertarian thought, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 2 Comments

Vietnamese imperialism against Cambodia

I was raised in a generation that was trained to view the Vietnamese as victims of American atrocities.  Growing up, we were treated to images of children burned by napalm,  stories of Agent Orange and “secret” bombings.  My generation was the first to experience the naked horrors of war via television and the first to view government crimes against humanity on our color screens.
But, like most things in life, the truth is far more complicated.  There are rarely clear-cut “good guys” and “bad guys” when it comes to national/ethnic rivalries.  Today, I was chatting with a Cambodian woman and she claimed that the version of Indochinese history I had been taught was all wrong.  In her view, the Vietnamese had not rescued Cambodia from the Khmer Rouge.  Rather, they were the ones who instigated the genocide in the first place, and then used it as an excuse to expand their empire throughout Cambodia.  With great sadness, she explained that the border between Vietnam and Cambodia is an “open border”.
The term “open border” is loaded – especially when one of the two countries, that shares that border, has a population of 86 million while the other one has only 14 million.  In practice, what this means is that Cambodia is being inundated with Vietnamese.  When I asked the woman if this meant that Cambodians are becoming a minority within their own country, she nodded and almost cried.  She, herself, had almost been murdered by the Khmer Rouge – for the crime of being a city-dweller.
“Open borders” is a euphemism for the domination, by populous nations, over less populous ones.  In days gone by, it was advanced culture and technology or military might that determined who was the victor and who the vanquished.  Now, it is fertility or sheer numbers (the fruits of past fertility).
According to Cambodiana:

These definitions of these major concepts in international relations, known as sino centric “Tributary System”, before the advent of the United Nations demonstrates that Vietnam is not a liberator of Cambodia as they claimed to be. On the contrary, Vietnam colonialism and imperialism is the worst of its kind. Because, unlike western powers colonialism, Vietnam has not been only interested in  occupying the land of Chams and the Khmers only for economic exploitation purposes  only; it also had committed genocide against those original people of Champa and the Kampuchea Krom, to eliminated them from their ancestral land. SO, for Vietnam, to claim that it invaded Cambodia to save it., is to say the least, a lie.

Few people, listening to the Cambodian woman above, would describe her as “racist” or “Cambodian-supremicist”.  All she wants is the survival of her people and an end to their displacement by a similar, related group.  Few reasonable people could fault her for that.  How much greater is the tragedy of the British, the French, the Dutch and the Swedes, whose nations are being replaced by those who bear no resemblance to them – except insofar as they are human.
Perhaps the pro-white movement should shift its focus a bit and concentrate on opposing open borders of any kind and anywhere.  It is not only whites who suffer from open borders, although the loss of the white race would certainly have the largest impact on Mankind overall.  It is sad when one people seeks to destroy another.  It is even sadder when a people seeks to destroy itself.

Posted in pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 32 Comments

hbd for cats – by menchi cat

many believe that hbd is only for people.  but this is not true.  we cats have our own hbd but we call it fbd for feline biodiversity.  fbd is important for cats.  you see, my momma was a siamese but my poppa was a tabby.     tabbys are cute and cuddly but they are not good daddies; they never stick around.  did you  know that a tabbys personality can be judged by his markings.  i found an internet site that says this

Most of the tabby cats are known to be happy-go-lucky by nature, while some of them are ferocious and get angry if their wishes are not fulfilled. They love to play around and are usually more attracted to a particular person in the house, who does all the tasks related to their day to day routines. The colors of the stripes on the body do determine the tabby cat personality. Those cats which are black or white in color are said to be cool and people loving. Some tabby cats are shy and love to spend hours in a peaceful and quiet place. They enjoy to be treated with love, care and handled softly while lifting or playing with them.*

you humans think that cats dont care about color but we do.  we notice it all the time.  when i see another cat close to my house, the first thing i notice is her color and markings.  if i dont like her i hiss – well okay, i always hiss at other cats.  we also notice their smell.  i dont like the smell of other cats.  i do like the way people smell, especially jewamongyou.
each race of cat has a personality that it is likely to have.  somebody on the internet wrote this

  • Persian – Persians are very calm and laid back kittens, with the Himalayans (color points) being a bit more vocal. They require lots of grooming!
  • Maine Coon – The Maine Coon is one of the largest of pet cats, and they are said to have a very dog-like personality and are known for games of fetch.
  • Exotic – The Exotic has the personality of a Persian without all the grooming requirements.
  • Siamese – The easily recognizable Siamese is a very intelligent, loyal, and vocal kitty. Abyssinian – Abyssinians love everyone they meet and are a very active and playful breed.
  • Ragdoll – Ragdolls gained their popularity for going limp in your arms when you pick them up. They are so docile that it is dangerous to let them outdoors unattended. They are another very large breed!
  • Birman – Birmans are said to adjust to their family’s routine as they are easily adaptable. They have long hair but are also very easy to groom.
  • Oriental – The Oriental is very people-oriented, not as chatty as the Siamese but has the same great looks.American Shorthair – The American Shorthair is one of the best breeds around children. The most popular purebred American Shorthair is silver with black tabby striping.
  • Tonkinese – The Tonkinese can be a strong-willed kitty, but they have such a fun personality that it makes up for it if you have the patience to train them properly. They are very loving, and grooming is practically carefree.**

i think this is true because i am half siamese and i am very smart.  but i still dont understand what the shift key is for.  jewamongyou tried to explain it to me.  he is even smarter than i am.
i know there are no jewish cats but there are jewish katz, but i never met one.  if i do i hope they smell good.
among cats, we understand that our races are different.  we dont care.  there are no liberals among cats.  we usually hate each other anyway.
thank you for reading this.  im going to sleep now.
*http://www.buzzle.com/articles/tabby-cat-personality.html
**http://www.suite101.com/content/choosing-the-right-cat-breed-a12562

Posted in racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 2 Comments

Mercator projection

The Earth is roughly spherical but, unless one is using a globe, our representations of it are flat.  This presents a problem, for any flat representation of a spherical object must distort the original in some way.  As a child, I had a large map of the world on my wall.  It helped me learn geography as my young mind traveled to exotic places using the cheapest plane tickets possible: flights of imagination.  My map used the Mercator projection, which made Scandinavia appear to dominate Europe.  Greenland looked as large as Africa.

For a long time, I believed France was about as big as Congo.
As the 20th century neared its end, grumblings were heard regarding the Mercator projection.  It was pointed out that the areas where white people live are shown to be much larger than the areas where dark-skinned people live.  In other words, Mercator is racist.  Forces agitated for the adoption of an alternative projection, specifically Peter’s projection.  The Savvy Traveller writes:

A variety of social and religious groups argue that since the Mercator map makes many countries appear smaller than they really are, people seeing them may infer that certain countries are innately more important than others. This rhetoric has often escalated to the point where the Mercator map is openly described as being “racist”. Many of these groups are working to address this perceived problem by lobbying schools around the world to adopt the Peters projection map in classrooms. This movement is not without controversy, however, since educators, well-aware of the Mercator map’s deficiencies, were already adopting maps based on other projections, some of which are even more accurate than Peters.

One school of thought advocated putting the South on top and the North on the bottom.  After all, their reasoning went, putting the North on top implies that those who live in the North (mostly whites) are better than those who live in the South.  Some of my family members agreed with this point and one of them even displayed an “upside down” map of the world on his wall.  To a certain extent, I can understand this point of view.  After all, it is completely arbitrary that North appears on top and South on the bottom of most maps.   There was a time when it could be either way; the North-on-top convention had not yet set in.  This in mind, I would like to suggest that all schools start using the following map:

I think it is noteworthy that, while anti-white forces have won almost all their battles, there have been few, if any, recent efforts to impose a “people-of-color” friendly projection upon us.  I do not think this is an oversight; instead I think the forces of evil have decided to go along with Mercator and North-on-top.  The reason is probably that they must continue to portray “people-of-color” as underdogs if they wish to avoid arousing the anger/fear of what remains of the white world.  By depicting nations such as Congo as small, the masses can be fooled into thinking they pose no threat.  By showing them on the bottom, the masses can be fooled into thinking that whites still have the advantage.
If everybody realized that just one African nation, Congo, is as large as all of Western Europe and could easily overwhelm Western Europe with its large population and fertility rates, perhaps more people would be appropriately alarmed.  The powers that be do not want alarm; they want complacency.  The Mercator projection inspires complacency – and so, it remains.

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 4 Comments

Malta under seige

“Xenophobia” is one of those words the anti-white movement has misused and twisted.  A phobia is an irrational, persistent fear of something.  Dictionary.com defines “xenophobia” as…

an unreasonable fear or hatred of foreigners or strangers or of that which is foreign or strange.

But there is nothing unreasonable about fearing waves of uninvited migrants to your nation, when the nation in question is Malta.  Malta is a small collection of islands comprising only 122 square miles.  It is one of the most densely populated nations on Earth and its inhabitants are more or less homogeneous.  Maltese is a Semitic language, though it is written in Roman characters and has many Indo-European loan words.  Given this scenario, no reasonable person could claim that the influx of thousands of black Africans would do Malta any good.  Yet this is exactly what has been going on over the past decade.  Watch this Euronews documentary video and it is not difficult to envision a repeat of the process that has taken place all over the Western world: 1) black African refugees arrive 2) crime, filth and disease arrive with them 3) they date/attack local women 4) local resentment grows 5) the blacks blame their failings on “racism” or “xenophobia” but insist on staying 6) they have many children and use up social services 7) large swaths of the victim country become little Africas, where whites enter at their own peril.  Is this the future that Malta desires?  Is it “phobic” to wish to avoid it?
Malta finds itself at risk, according to the Euronews video, because of its geographical location.  Or perhaps the Africans mistakenly believe it is the source of Malt Liquor – in which case a change of name should be considered.  Either way, this tiny nation cannot afford to be nice to African migrants if it is to survive as a nation.
It seems there are parallels between Maltese and Hebrew, other than the fact that they are both Semitic, and  I found an interesting article that compares the rebirth of Maltese, as a national language, to that of Hebrew:

The Origins and Renaissance of Maltese
But how was Maltese preserved and elevated, and what was Hebrew’s role in the matter? In the late 1870s. A handful of local scholars believing that Maltese descended from the dialect spoken in Carthage and originally brought there by the Phoenicians and later known as “Punic” deserved to respected rather than held in contempt. They argued that, as a language closely related to the Hebrew and Aramaic spoken by Jesus and the disciples, Maltese had a noble affiliation to them both. How could such a language be fit only for the market or the fisherman’s wharf and boat? Why should it be denied as the language of instruction in the schools, the courts and capable of producing a great literature?
Only in the mid 19th century, did scholars finally adapt Maltese to a written standard using Latin letters and thereby greatly increased literacy. This success brought immense new prestige to the language that was the spoken vernacular of more than 95% of the island’s population. The publication of a book in Italian “Saggio intorno alla lingua Maltese come effine all’Ebraico in 1880 enabled the cause of Maltese to finally make headway among many of the island’s Italian speaking intellectuals who had previously spurned the language. The author of the book, Annibale Preca, argued for the close association of Hebrew and Arabic with Maltese…

What a shame it would be if, after all the effort spent on resurrecting Malta’s fading heritage, it were transformed into a mere outpost of Africa.*
* See also the American Renaissance news clip on this matter.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 6 Comments

Tyler Perry and black charity

When I saw that entertainment mogul Tyler Perry had pledged to rebuilt the home of an 88-year-old Georgia grandmother, pay her rent in the interim and buy her all new furniture, I immediately assumed that the grandmother, and her family, must be black.  But we wouldn’t know if from the AP press release.  Nor would we know if from the Yahoo article.  We would not know it from the newsone article.  We would never be able to figure it out from the local Access Atlanta blurb either.  TV guide also gives no hint of this.  The Los Angeles Times is the same way.  Every one of the news outlets above, and many more, were careful to include a photo of Perry in the article, even though he is a celebrity and most people would probably already know what he looks like.  Generally, when people are the beneficiaries of unusual charity, the media is sure to publish photos of them.  Why, in this case, was it not done?
Clearly, the media establishment wants to be certain the entire world knows that a black celebrity was generous with his money.  How was I able to confirm that the grandmother, and her family, are black?  Through the website of a T.V. station, whose article was published before Perry got involved.  Here is the photo:

The media is suppressing the race of the beneficiaries just as it is accustomed to suppress the (black) race of the perpetrators of crime when it is possible to do so.
I want to emphasis that there is absolutely nothing wrong with blacks taking care of other blacks first and foremost.  I do not fault Perry for doing this.  On the contrary, he is worthy of praise.  But I do fault the media for misleading the public and trying to portray this as if Perry is colorblind in his good works.

Posted in examples of propaganda | 4 Comments