The dangerous concept of "conservatism"

Posted on March 29, 2010 by jewamongyou

There was a time, not long ago, when most whites felt good about their own race, when they objected to miscegenation, racial integration and the notion that all races are equal.  Since these attitudes are largely those of the past, they are now often associated with other attitudes of the past such as opposition to: feminism, new styles of music, body art, pornography, atheism and homosexuality.  It was, of course, the leftists who were largely responsible for relegating those attitudes to the past in the first place.  By seizing control of the education system and government, they were able to change prevailing attitudes about such things.  Once this was accomplished, they were able to describe the displaced attitudes as “old-fashioned”.  Another word for “old-fashioned” is “conservative”.
While there is plenty of variety of opinion amongst those who call themselves “conservative”, the powers that be have succeeded in associating the term with certain values in the eyes of the general public:
1)  An adherence to traditional religion or, at least, a respect toward it
2)  A lack of tolerance toward sexual minority practices
3)  A preference for a certain way of dressing and certain music
4)  A respect for the rule of law domestically but a “my country right or wrong” attitude internationally.
5)  A deference toward one’s own race, especially the white race
It might be accurate to describe the lumping of all these together, under the umbrella of “conservative” as the “Archie Bunker Complex”.  Though I might risk sounding like a conspiracy theorist, I believe it is possible that the left intentionally nurtured this wider notion of “conservatism” as part of a strategy of divide and conquer.
When I met Matthew Tait in Virginia this February, we had a short conversation about socialism and race realism.  I told him that I disapprove of socialism and that the BNP does seem to be socialist in nature.  We agreed, in the end, that our most pressing concern should be the preservation of the true British in Britain.  Everything else is secondary.  If the British people (or white people in general) become extinct, then the political and social trappings of white civilization will fade away as well.  At that point, libertarianism would not be viable.  So, if the only movement capable of rescuing the British people happens to be a socialist one, then so be it.  If a person is trapped in a burning building, and a firefighter arrives to rescue him, is he going to concern himself with the creed of the firefighter?  So, even though the BNP is not “conservative” in the political sense, still we should consider them allies in our racial struggle.
Why do non-religious race realists go out of their way to bash homosexuals?  I can understand Judeo-Christian ones doing so – it’s an “abomination”.  But the advancement of an anti-white agenda is a far more serious “bomb in our nation” than homosexuals and why make enemies when you could make friends instead?
It should be obvious that only the practice of heterosexuality can propagate our species and race.  In that sense, it is the sexuality that is “normal” on a societal level.  That being said, I don’t think we should condemn individuals for leaning that way and we certainly should not reject them from our movement.  So my stance on this is that homosexuality should not be promoted amongst our children and it should not be portrayed as equal to heterosexuality in virtue.  But we should not try to make life miserable for those who practice it – whether we hold such urges to be a matter of choice or not.  I don’t see the point in wasting pixels condemning homosexuals either; they’ll do as they please with or without our approval and it really is none of our business.  As for those who parade about publicly half naked to show their pride, they invite ridicule upon themselves but that’s where it should stop: ridicule and exercising our own rights to freedom of association.

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 18 Comments

Racism in our daily lives 2

Posted on March 28, 2010 by jewamongyou

Here we have yet another example of non-white privilege:

A $1,000 scholarship …was elected from among about 40 peers in the sessions to have best embodied the program’s ideals of positive attitude and collaboration… particularly kids of minority heritage, who demonstrate ability and interest in technology careers.

This is the cheerful, smiley face of discrimination against whites.  It’s not enough that the recipient’s white colleagues (sure, they threw a Hispanic in the photo for good measure) were deemed “not worthy” of the scholarship (due to their second class status), but they are even made to smile for the camera to showcase it.  What can be more sick than a society, founded by whites, discriminating against whites?  The brainwashing of youngsters into cheerfully submitting to such injustice and making them believe that, somehow, this is a “positive” thing.

Posted in examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites | 1 Comment

My Amren wish list

Posted on March 27, 2010 by jewamongyou

Far be it from me to try to dictate the policies of a noble organization such as Amren, but this doesn’t mean I cannot put forward my own wish list and I hope that if Mr. Taylor reads this, he will take it as friendly suggestions rather than complaints:
1)  While Amren is, officially, a monthly magazine, in the minds of many it is more than that.  If it were only a magazine, we would not have semiannual meetings.  My wish is that Amren become a bona fide organization in the sense that it would have membership and annual/monthly fees (aside from the subscription fees).  These fees would be put to good use to aid whites around the world, fund scholarships and fight discrimination against whites.  It would be something like the CofCC only not Christian oriented and, perhaps, with a more libertarian bent.
2)  It has been written that Amren is merely a message board for people to gripe about the evils of non-whites, specifically blacks and Hispanics.  Of course this is not so – but I think it would be beneficial to exercise tighter control over posted comments.  Though I’ve been guilty of it myself, we should refrain from taking cheap shots at non-whites that our enemies can use as evidence of our “racism”.  Our enemies are ignorant of the massive crimes perpetrated against whites world-wide.  Therefore, they do not understand the anger and resentment that most of us feel.  I’ve already written about the difference between expressing bitterness about injustice and mindless hatred.  Those in power use blacks and Hispanics as whips to torment us.  We lash out, verbally, against the whips instead of those holding the whips.  Of course, many claim it is “the Jews” holding the whips and that is a different subject (already addressed somewhat).  So, though it may be comforting for us to spew venom about blacks and Hispanics, we should ask ourselves if this is helpful to our cause.  I think such talk needlessly turns away many good people and helps alienate the good blacks and Hispanics who deserve to hear our message just like anybody else.  So my suggestion would be that Mr. Taylor make it quite clear that Amren hates no one because of their race or ethnicity – and then make sure the comments reflect that attitude.  Amren’s message should be solely a positive one, as Mr. Craig Bodeker rhetorically asks in his video “why is it that pro whites are assumed to be anti everybody else?”  Of course even such a change of tone will not satisfy the leftists for, in their eyes, any negative comment about their favorite ethnicities is a stain that will never fade.  But it is not those hardened leftists who are Amren’s target audience; they will never change.  The target audience is those reasonable people who might get the message if it were presented without what they’ve been raised to consider shrill hysterics.
3)  Expand the “Activists Corner“.  Surely we can come up with more than four fliers – and yes, I’m as guilty as anybody for not creating them (stay tuned).  The Activist Corner might have a wider variety of suggestions how to make a difference in our communities.   It could list emails and phone numbers, of people willing to have such information posted, so that others in their area can contact them.  It might include links to short, and effective videos that people can send to their friends and family.  The Activist Corner should not be hidden away, as an obscure link under “Contact Us”.  Instead, it should be a large, prominent, link out in the open where nobody could miss it.  Activism should be the primary focus of Amren; without it, we are only preaching to the choir.  Many years ago, I was involved with Habad/Lubavitch.  This is a Hassidic sect known for its activism.  We would stand on street corners asking random people “Excuse me, are you Jewish?” and then, if their answer was “yes”, we would speak to them, give them literature and perform Jewish rituals with them.  This takes a lot of courage and commitment.  Perhaps Amren should learn from Habad.  Mr. Taylor could be the Amrener Rebbe!
4)  The American Renaissance magazine is always a pleasure to read but I think there is room for improvement, at least in the electronic version.  It would be more entertaining if they could find a more-or-less talented cartoonist to spice it up with humor.  The letters to the editor section could be about twice as long.  There could be a quiz or puzzle in each issue – whose solution would be in the following issue.  In short, Amren could stand to steal some ideas from traditional newspapers.  Ideas that were implemented in order to encourage people to read them.  There is no need to reinvent the wheel; shamelessly copy those ideas.

Posted in activism | 5 Comments

Win-win situation?

Posted on March 25, 2010 by jewamongyou

It appears that some Muslims object to the new full body scanners now mandatory in the U.K. (thanks to strike the root for the link).  I think it’s abhorrent of governments to force people to reveal their naked bodies in order to travel by plane.  It seems there is no limit to the depths governments will descend to in order to humiliate us “for our own safety”.
I do find it interesting, however, that Muslims might especially have a problem with it – considering that their presence was what caused the threat that served as an excuse for such excesses in the first place.  Muslims, in large numbers, do not belong in European society; they make no secret of their plans to overwhelm Western nations with their numbers and, eventually, subjugate the native populations.
Will Muslim protests eventually scale back the police state?  I doubt that their overall effect will be positive but we can at least hope for positive outcomes now and then.  In this particular case, if Muslims succeed in eliminating this latest government indignity, it will be a small victory for us all.  If they are made uncomfortable enough to leave, in large numbers, then it will be a large victory for the rest of us.  Given the pitiful track record of the U.K., my guess is that there will be special provisions for Muslims so that they can have another Muslim (of the same sex) body search them.  Then, of course, we lose.  Will non-Muslims be reduced to pretending they are Muslim in order to avoid the body scan?  Personally, I think the body scan would be less of an indignity.
As a side note, I think that when we are forced to reveal ourselves in such a way in order to travel by plane, we can have fun with it.  Specifically I’m thinking of using some sort of high-density tape to write messages on our own bodies in such a way that only through the scanner will it be visible.  The government goon who “makes his living” by humiliating the rest of us would be treated to such sublime messages as “F**k you!” or “You’re a loser” or “Get a REAL job”.

Posted in libertarian thought, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Is anti-semitism good for the Jewish people?

Posted on March 23, 2010 by jewamongyou

When the bulk of European Jewry gradually lost its distinctive Mid-Eastern look , culture – especially language, religion and dress – became the only things that set these Jews apart from their gentile neighbors.  While Europe was effective in erasing the “Jewish look” over a thousand years, America was effective in erasing Jewish culture within a century (with obvious exceptions of course).  Nonetheless many American Jews still wish to remain “Jewish” even as they retain only faint vestiges of their ancestral culture.  While an Irish-American might be content to dust off his Irishness once a year to celebrate St. Patrick’s day, and an Italian-American might reminisce about his grandmother’s cooking, a Jew often feels the need for his Jewishness to take a more active role in his life.  He might feel empty otherwise.
An occasional anti-Jewish slur, by a passing drunk, is enough to fill this role.  As a matter of fact, so desperate have some Jews become, to find anti-semitism, that they will even cling to outbursts by drunk celebrities directed at nobody in particular.
Pathetic as such bottom-feeding may sound, from an objective point of view, occasional displays of anti-semitism do serve to remind Jews that they are Jews and therefore strengthen our ethnic cohesion.  In this sense they are productive.  Many “lost Jewish souls” found their way back to Judaism because of anti-semitism.
It is not a pleasant experience to be the target of ethnic slurs or intimidation.  I can say this having experienced it myself.  Yet we can look at it as a bitter pill to swallow for those Jews who are lost to their people and on the verge of total assimilation.
When I argue for the continuity of my own people, I am not advocating for a complete return to traditional Judaism – and in this I walk a fine line.  One that is full of questions and contradictions.  Can the Jewish People exist long term without its religion?  Should it?  What right do Jews have to the Promised Land if they do not believe in either He who promised it or the book that documents it?  Alas, I do not have all the answers – but future posts may explore them further.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | 12 Comments

Provisional whites

Posted on March 22, 2010 by jewamongyou

Earlier, I quoted diamed from his blog The Road Less Traveled.  There is much of interest in that blog and I recently came across his take on borderline “whiteness”.  Any white movement must, sooner or later, resolve the problem of how to define “white”.  I recommend reading the entire post but here is his idea in a nutshell:

If someone is 3/4 white and 1/4 black, he’s provisionally white. If he acts like a decent white man who calls himself white and defends other whites, he’ll stay provisionally white. He can never be pure white, because he is too genetically distant. But he can be provisionally white. If he identifies as a black and walks around with a chip on his shoulder blaming everything on whites and saying ‘kill the white man,’ then he’s a black. For this reason, Jeremiah Wright, who’s clearly genetically closer to white than black, is a black. He lost his chance at whiteness by damning us to hell. See how it works? In all borderline cases, the cases constantly thrown at us by anti-racists: “Well what about mixed races? What about jews? What about Armenians? What about –?” The answer is now solvable. “These people are provisionally white, their own behavior will determine whether they are included by us, or excluded by us, as white or non-white.” If anyone wants to be included by us, all they have to do is ‘act white.’ Behave well, behave righteously, identify yourself as white, and be loyal to the white race.

Tentatively I like his idea because, in practice, many of us have been looking at things this way for a long time.  If we encounter a light-skinned “black” who speaks and behaves just like a white and whose attitudes are those of a healthy white, do we not look at that person (for most purposes) as a white?  What diamed did was put into writing what has been lurking in the backs of many of our minds anyway.  Codifying it is a step in the right direction.  He goes on to list three tiers of “whiteness”:

First Tier: Genetically white, whitey-mc-white-whites. These people should be given free admission to the country, on the sole basis of loyalty and abiding by the laws we set forth. This is the easiest level of admission.
Second Tier: Borderline cases, provisionally white. These people would be included on a case by case scenario, based on their loyalty, behavior, and character. This is a stricter standard than the previous standard, but admission is still open. IE, as many people of this type as qualify, are allowed in.
Third Tier: Non-whites. These people would again be included only as individuals. But they would have to have exceptional abilities. For instance, an IQ no less than 120. Perfect health. Good looks. Extremely talented athletes. Extremely rich. Skilled workers. Scientists or artists who have proven their stuff. You get the idea. In addition, they must be loyal to our race and abide by our laws. Obviously, if they make trouble, they’re gone. Whatever compassion or patience we show for the first tier, will not be shown to the third tier. And in addition to this, they can at no time exceed 10% of the population. So no matter how qualified you are, if our quota is full, you can’t enter. Through this simple measure, the white genome can’t be extinguished, AND we can select non-whites for their quality. This way, we do not cut ourselves off from the gifts and genes of exceptional non-whites, but we do not destroy ourselves either. It’s fair and balanced. If non-whites resent all the restrictions we put upon them, tough, they still have the rest of the world to live on. They don’t have to live here. Humorously enough, even if jews weren’t provisionally white, I’d still allow many of them in as non-whites with exceptional ability. Excluding jews entirely, who hold the secrets to a 15 IQ boost somewhere in their genes, would be sheer folly.

It seems to be as good a system as any but I do have a couple of problems with it.  Even though I am not a subscriber to the idea of a “pure race”, it seems to me that we do have relatively pure races.  As it stands today, most people who consider themselves “white” are relatively pure; it is likely that they have, in their distant past, some non-whites but they are still pure-blooded enough to be considered of “indigenous European” origin.  I doubt that “Native Americans” can say the same.  We Jews lost that relative purity long ago so that now we’re reduced to various degrees of mongrelization.  It would be a shame if the same thing happened to whites and diamed’s suggestion of allowing 10% of the white population to be non-white would certainly lead to gradual degradation.  Furthermore, in any large nation, politics and corruption would surely come into play when determining who has the “right attitudes” (amongst borderline whites) to be worthy of being “provisional whites”.  There would be many grey areas and, in the end, who you know would carry as much weight as anything else.  Perhaps it would be best if any future white nation be a small nation or a confederation of small nations.  This might help curb corruption.
I think this would be a good place to point out what many of us already know: in the long run, the only way to ensure the survival of the white race is for there to be a white nation with strong territorial integrity.  In the long run there are only two possibilities: the extinction of the white race or the creation of a white nation.  This cannot be said of any other major race of Mankind.  There is no danger of Orientals or blacks becoming extinct.  As for Australian Aborigines, Polynesians, Pygmies and various Native American tribes, they need to have their own nations as well.  I would not want them to disappear either.  Polynesians, given their own exclusive nation, would also have to grapple with the question “who is a Polynesian?”  As for those who wish for the extinction of whites, or any other race, what they are really advocating for is genocide.  In civilized society, we do not hold those who promote genocide in high esteem.  It could reasonably be said that such people are “haters” and “bigots”.   Therefore you, the reader, have a choice: either you are a “white nationalist” or you are a “bigot”.  Which will it be?

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 17 Comments

Is there hope for the future?

Posted on March 21, 2010 by jewamongyou

I have a dear friend who firmly believes that there is no hope for the white race.  He is an atheist so he holds no hope of salvation via supernatural forces.  From a moral standpoint, he correctly points out that the vast majority of whites deserve what they get; they hate their own genes and allow themselves to be trampled upon and enslaved.  There is no government, on the face of the Earth, that has any concern for the white race.  Neither are there any major corporations that possess any loyalty for the white race.  It would appear that there are not even any very wealthy individuals who champion our cause.  If ever there were an underdog, in the history of Mankind, it would be white nationalists and race realists in our own era.  As white nationalists go, so goes the white race in general.
A gentleman by the name of Diamed the roadless writes:

“After twenty years of lobbying for political improvements for the white majority, Amren, Vdare, and their ilk have achieved nothing. In fact, everything has gotten irretrievably worse in all categories. Restoring America is like putting humpty dumpty back together again. The generations born and raised today don’t even have any concept of what America’s past was like. If they learn anything about the past, it’s that it was wholly evil and repugnant. Nor do the young of today have any knowledge or connection to their European homelands. They are completely rootless, tradition-less, and atomized.”

He claims that, in the end, advanced technology will reign supreme, that we shall be replaced by androids or something to that effect.  Follow the link above and read the whole column – if you don’t mind being depressed.  One of the claims he debunks is that “worse is better”.  Indeed, many have pointed to South Africa as proof that virtually nothing can awaken the slumbering white masses, even as they are slaughtered, raped and marginalized to the extreme.  One might counter that South Africa cannot serve as proof of white apathy and obliviousness because a white South African can always aspire to escape to safer, more tranquil regions.  Indeed many have already done so.  The same can be said about white Americans.  They have fled the inner cities for the suburbs and the suburbs for the town and the towns for yet other towns.  Eventually, there will be nowhere to run to and nowhere to hide.  Then what?  I hold an ember of hope that, with his back to the wall, the white male will shake the dust off his manliness and revert to an earlier state of being – when he will be worthy of the name “man”.  I hold some hope that the white female, with her back to the wall, will tire of being the plaything of men of color.  That she will remember how all the great things whites have accomplished could not have been done if not for the power of her womb.  At that point, she will be reborn and merit the name “woman”.
I’ve often claimed that there is a link between the hatred leftists have for the white race, on the one hand, and their ceaseless yearning for a return to nature on the other.  One need not be an expert demographer to conclude that a truly global economy, with free movement of people, will eventually result in the countless masses from failed societies migrating to more successful societies and overwhelming the latter.  Ostensibly, the leftist holds that there are no meaningful differences between the races.  Indeed, he rejects the concept of “race” entirely (except when it suits his convenience of course).  This is why he is not bothered by the eventual colonization, of the entire world, by blacks.  Presented with this possibility, he will laugh.  He laughs for two reasons: Firstly because he doesn’t think such a thing possible – much as he once laughed at the idea that the U.S. would become majority non-white.  Secondly because he doesn’t see that it would matter anyhow; after all, “we’re all the same”.
With the current arrangement, blacks will inherit the Earth because of two things: they have the most babies and, due to their lower average I.Q. and higher impulsiveness/testosterone, their societies are generally not as successful as other societies.  Since their societies tend to be chaotic, crime-ridden and poor, they will be net exporters of people; few non-blacks would choose to live among them given a choice.  Over the course of time, their excess babies will spread throughout the globe and steadily blacken their host countries.  We would do well to look carefully at successful black societies and try to find ways to clone them in other places – but that is a topic for another post.
I do not believe that the above scenario is lost upon the leftist elites.  As a matter of fact, I think it quite likely that they view the black colonization of the Earth as a means to an end: our return to nature.  Once all nations are sufficiently blackened, the elites will be able to control Earth’s population with great ease.  Not only will they be able to control it, they will be able to reduce it.  They aim to reduce our population to such an extent that nature will reclaim what it has lost over the last few hundred years.  As a matter of fact, without majority white nations to prop up third world countries and to feed their starving millions, the elites needn’t do anything.  All they’ll have to do is sit back and watch as the Earth’s population dwindles of its own accord.  Many will starve and many more will wither away from disease.  Yet more will be killed in wars – wars for fresh water and food.  In their eyes, all this is a good thing.  The very last thing a black person should want is the destruction of white nations and the Western societies that they make possible.  If blacks believe they are suffering now, let them wait and see how much worse it will be without whites to give them sanctuary and aid.
After all is said and done, we can rest assured that the elites will be protected in their guarded, gated communities (or perhaps deep underground).  We can also rest assured that most of those elites will be white.  They will be few and they will probably be evil but they will still carry white genes and, the Earth being empty as it is, they will want children.  Even a handful of people can go forth and repopulate the Earth – so I would not give up so easily.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 4 Comments

Using "A Conversation About Race" effectively

Posted on March 20, 2010 by jewamongyou

A few months ago, I purchased “A Conversation About Race” and I thoroughly enjoyed it.  Within a short time, I had no less than six people watch it at my home.  After mentioning it to my boss, I offered to lend him the DVD.  He found it thought-provoking and agreed with Greg Bodeker on just about every count.  Since then, I’ve had at least ten other co-workers borrow the DVD and watch it.  In fact, it hasn’t seen the doors of my home in several months.  It seems to me that this valuable tool would be wasted gathering dust on a shelf somewhere.  My point, in all this, is not to brag but to encourage my readers to do the same.  It’s probably a good idea to make sure that all transfers, of the DVD, take place outside of your actual work environment.  The parking lot might be a good place.  It’s probably also a good idea to avoid drawing the attention of non-whites – just so you won’t have to do any unnecessary explaining.

Posted in activism, book/movie/video reviews and links | 1 Comment

Racism in our daily lives…

Posted on March 19, 2010 by jewamongyou

Our company decided to fund a scholarship and:

Preference will be given to women and applicants of minority heritage; if no eligible female or minority student applies, a total of two scholarships will be awarded to other students.

This blatant racism was brought to my attention by none other than my boss, who found it insulting that he (being a white male) would be considered a second-class citizen in the eyes of his employer. While this was being discussed amongst us,  I took advantage of the situation, trying to recruit some of my co-workers to join me downtown with signs denouncing anti-white discrimination (though not, specifically, our employer).  There were no serious takers though.  One man equated such a protest with being neo-Nazi or skin-head.  It was asked why it is considered alright to discriminate against whites so openly and to such a degree.  My answer was, of course, that it is because only whites allow themselves to be trampled upon.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites | 8 Comments

Changing our tactics pt. 2

Posted on March 17, 2010 by jewamongyou

After I recently posted about changing our tactics, people commented with worthy suggestions.  Those suggestions related to immigration law, the education system and the media.  While all those are worthy goals, I think there are more effective, and realistic, things we can do right away.
First of all, we need to set up a fund (we can call it a “scholarship”) from which sums are awarded based on Educational Blitzkrieg Attacks.  These E.B.A.’s would have to accomplish certain things and avoid certain things.
They must be directed at children or young people.  They must be composed of effective, accurate and positive sound bites.  They must attract a certain amount of attention.  They must be done in a fun and cheerful manner (ideally with a smile).  At least two people should participate, ideally three (one to document it on video).
They cannot be dangerous, illegal or hostile in any way.  They should not appear suspicious or sneaky.  They must not be negative, hateful or “anti” anybody.
An ideal E.B.A. would be to wait outside a school when classes are dismissed for the day.  When the children are out and about, they will be treated to the sound of a bull-horn saying things like “Be proud of your European heritage!  Your heritage is precious!”  This would last only a few moments.  Wait a few days, or weeks, and then do it again – but with a different, related message.  With any luck, those words will get some of the children thinking and asking questions.  We are forced to pay taxes so that government can pollute the minds of our children with leftist garbage.  The least we can do in return is give those kids some truth.
Another E.B.A. would be in the form of fliers.  These fliers would be colorful and cartoonish.  Each one might highlight a different famous white person.  At the bottom, the bold caption might read “Your European ancestors did much to be proud of!”  I know many will disagree with me on this, but I believe it is better to use the word “European” than “white”.  These fliers could be given away with toys – but the child would have to listen to a minute or two of European accomplishments before getting the toy.
More adult-oriented fliers would be used with college and high school students.  Perhaps some of them would mention the plight of whites in South Africa – or even America (as long as it doesn’t mention other races by name or inference).  We want to be careful so that nobody can accuse us of spreading hate amongst children.  It might be a good idea to set up a booth, near a high school, with music.  In exchange for a free school supply or an i-tune gift card, the student would have to listen to a couple of minutes of European history and pride.  When adults walk up and ask “what are you doing?” The answer would be “We are trying to raise awareness of European-American heritage.”  Say it with a smile and offer to share some information with the adult as well.
Many are not willing, or able, to participate in such activities.  But there is no need for them to feel left out; they can always donate to the E.B.A. fund and encourage others to do so.  The fund will provide a monetary award to those who can document that they participated in such activities.   If hundreds of occurrences, like those described above, take place all over America people will start to notice.  Sooner or later there will even be local news coverage.  This sort of movement would be like a Tea Party for white activists.  A campaign like this would be wholesome, American and guaranteed to get results – because we can blog about national policy until we’re blue in the face but, outside of our own circles, few care.  Our future is with our youth and our youth is at school – so this is where they must be reached.

Posted in activism, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 3 Comments