Amren Conference 2020

Posted on January 8, 2020 by jewamongyou

I’m in the process of signing up for this year’s Amren (American Renaissance) conference. I say “in the process” because banks have been participating in the War against Whites for some time now – and it is no longer possible to tender payments to American Renaissance via credit card.

Instead, we must now fill out an online form, which will reserve our place at the conference/hotel, and then send in a check or money order by snail mail.

This inconvenience shouldn’t impact the number of attendees; anybody who is willing and able to attend this conference should be committed enough to overcome such minor obstacles. It’s not the sort of thing a casual visitor would do on a whim. White-Advocacy conferences are not an impulse-buy. Revolutions aren’t accomplished by armchair warriors who can’t be bothered to walk to the mail box.

My hope is that these recent difficulties with the banks will serve to illustrate, to those on the fence, the necessity of supporting white-advocacy groups, such as American Renaissance. The fact that powerful forces so desperately seek to prevent us from holding conferences, and meeting face to face, should reinforce our resolve to do just that.

Some, such as Greg Johnson (In Defense of Prejudice pg. 67), argue that:

… maybe it is time to rethink the conference model altogether. The internet and digital audio production and film-making technologies have dramatically undermined the monopoly of the mainstream media. Jared Taylor can sit in his family room, address a digital camera, upload his talk to the web, and practically everyone on the planet with computer access can view it.

Every American Renaissance speech could be professionally filmed and distributed the same way. The cameraman could travel to the speakers and film them in their homes with proper lighting and sound. They would also have the leisure  to get every presentation perfect, without being hurried along by the conference schedule.

He goes on to list the great costs of such conferences, and that web-based presentations are far more efficient in reaching large audiences.

From a practical perspective, Mr. Johnson is right – but the fact remains that every time we successfully hold a conference, it’s a moral victory for us. Attendees leave with renewed morale and commitment.  But it’s not only attendees who benefit; thousands (if not millions) of others, around the world, are encouraged and invigorated through these conferences.

The fact that the most powerful institutions in the world, the major banks, have taken the trouble to silence us, should also illustrate the need to donate, and encourage those who can, to do so.

Do you think that a liberal, seeing a photo of a starving child in Africa, would excuse himself from donating on the grounds that the child has no bank account? White advocacy organizations are, in a sense, in a worse position than the starving child. At least the starving child has powerful NGOs working to raise him from his misery.

In conclusion, dear readers, whether or not you made a New Year’s resolution, take your $5 or $10 or $100 and send a check or money order to American Renaissance (call the number at the bottom of the page for information).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fake news from USA Today

Posted on January 4, 2020 by jewamongyou

In an article titled “We’re not going to cower...” USA Today describes how small Jewish communities, around America, are preparing for anti-Semitic attacks:

The challenges can be particularly steep for smaller communities, which often find themselves with fewer financial resources and isolated geographically. Paying for security measures like cameras, panic buttons, bulletproof glass, metal detectors or armed guards can add up quickly, and isn’t in every synagogue’s budget.

Interesting that USA sees fit to only list such expensive “solutions.” One can purchase a handgun for far less. If Orthodox Jews are truly worried about being attacked, they should assign one of their own to guard vulnerable locations while armed with a gun. I wonder why USA Today didn’t think of that… Must have been an oversight.

Who are Orthodox Jews afraid of? USA Today tells us:

… in 2018 there were 775 in the first half of the year. The deadliest came in Pittsburgh in October 2018, when 11 people were murdered by a white supremacist gunman. During the Monsy attack on Dec. 29, a man stabbed five people with a machete at the home of a rabbi. That attack came shortly after two shooters killed four people at a Jersey City, New Jersey, kosher market earlier in December.

Yes, I do remember that a “white supremacist” murdered 11 people in 2018. But the other attackers are described as “a man” and “shooters.” Of course, we know that those attackers, like so many others, were black. This is not kosher reporting.

Lion of the Blogosphere had been reporting black-on-Jewish attacks recently. Here are some from his blog:

https://nypost.com/2020/01/02/brutes-threaten-to-shoot-jewish-man-in-yet-another-anti-semitic-attack/

The 66-year-old victim of Tuesday’s assault was approached by three men at the intersection of S 4th and Keap Streets in Williamsburg at 3.58 p.m. on Tuesday, the source said.

The three assailants launched into an anti-Semitic diatribe, yelling “Jew Hitler burned you, I’ll shoot you,” but did not make any physical contact with the victim, the source said.

The NY Post does not say the race of the perps, but this happened in a Puerto Rican neighborhood (and very close to the housing project where my mom lived when she was a little girl)

Yesterday:

A Jewish teen riding a bus in Brooklyn was threatened at knife-point by two assailants who snatched his earbuds and yarmulke while making anti-Semitic remarks Tuesday, police said.

Today:

Two female attackers yelled “F— you Jew” and “I will kill you Jews” at a Brooklyn man before shoving him to the ground when he tried to film their anti-Semitic screed, law enforcement sources and witnesses said Wednesday.

Obviously all of these perps are black, even though the NY Post doesn’t explicitly say that.

If white youths had assaulted a black man for no reason, this would be the number one story on CNN.

But because it doesn’t advance the preferred narrative, it’s not reported by any fakestream media at all, it’s only a tweet.

It goes without saying that the ones we read about are only the tip of the iceberg. Many more go unreported, and un-prosecuted.

Since New York, and New Jersey, don’t allow law-abiding regular citizens to carry firearms, I recommend a two-word solution to this problem: Khop ‘im!

In the more free states, there’s better two-word solution: Concealed Carry!

 

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda, Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

The City of Beaverton celebrates The Great Replacement

Posted on January 2, 2020 by jewamongyou

I got the Beaverton, Oregon annual report in the mail a few days ago. It’s also available online.

On page 7 we find a brief overview of the City of Beaverton, along with a budget breakdown.

Beaverton POC

In a city that’s 66% white, East Indians are featured. As we can see, from the prominent text box at the top, the city’s leaders are proud of the fact that “One in three residents identify as a person of color.” This fact is listed together with the most basic statistics, between the overall population, and the geographical size.

Over the years that I’ve been here, I have noticed more and more non-whites. In other words, and as this page implies, whites are being replaced. If “one in three” is “progress”, then wouldn’t “three in three” be even MORE progress? If Diversity is a good thing, and the percentage of non-whites (“people of color”) reflects this, then doesn’t it follow that a white population of zero is the ultimate goal? If not, then wouldn’t it be fair to ask, “What percentage of whites would be ideal?”

Don’t expect an answer to this question.

On page 12, a Somali refugee is highlighted. We’re told how Abdi Nor Iftin, author of the book “Call me American,” has been travelling the country and met with congressmen. Apparently, Iftin did not want to continue living in 100% diverse Somalia. He found the 66% white USA much more to his liking. Where will he go when the United States is also 100% diverse? Iftin says:

I grew up in a civil war where I could get killed for saying the wrong word.

I wonder if Iftin realizes that the Portland area is not much different in this regard.

On page 10 of the report there’s an article titled “Investing in Diverse Leaders in Our Community.”

The city is recruiting participants for this year’s Beaverton Organizing and Leadership Development (BOLD) Program to be held this March to May. The BOLD Program is a leadership and civic engagement training for emerging immigrant and refugee leaders and leaders of color in Beaverton.

The program includes hands-on sessions focused on strengthening cross-cultural relationships; building leadership, community organizing, and advocacy skills and providing an in-depth orientation to city government and opportunities for engagement.

It would be interesting to know how much money the BOLD program costs; I didn’t see it in the annual budget breakdown. Somehow, I doubt that Abdi Nor Iftin attended this course – yet he seems to be doing quite well for himself. Also, what concrete financial benefits are taxpayers getting in return for this expense?

Honestly, when I see how devoted Mediagov is to the false god of Diversity, it makes me want to move to Mexico. I’d rather live among “people of color” than among self-loathing whites who have no self-respect.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Happy New Year to all of y’all!

Posted on January 1, 2020 by jewamongyou

2020 is almost upon us, and by the time most of y’all read this, it will already be here. So happy New Year to everybody reading this.

It’s not that I don’t have anything negative to say. In fact, I’ve got plenty of negative items I could bring up… but let’s start this new year with something positive.

Let’s talk about church-going blacks. While I’m aware that practically all of this crowd would vehemently oppose my politics, when it comes to casual encounters with them, my personal experiences have always been positive.

So it was today, when I met such a couple, and we had a few minutes to chat. They’re from New York, and they asked about my “nationality” (IE. my ethnicity). When I replied that I’m Jewish, they immediately expressed their sorrow, and disgust, at the recent attacks upon Jews in the New York area.

I asked them what their pastor had to say about these incidents, and how black churches in New York react to them. As one would expect, they said their pastor forcefully condemns any such attacks. Furthermore, their church works with the local Jewish community to help those in need, and to curb crime.

I have yet to see any stories in the “News” about such cooperation, but there probably will be such a story in the near future.

I think that, on the whole, Christianity has been good for American blacks – and for the non-blacks who live around them. When early Americans converted black slaves to Christianity, it probably wasn’t only the souls of the slaves that concerned them; it was probably also a matter of public safety. It was a win-win situation.

I’ll take this opportunity to disagree with what Jared Taylor said in his interview “Is Muslim Immigration Good for the West” At about 1:03, Mr. Taylor states that he doesn’t mind if Muslims are successful in converting Native Americans to Islam.

We SHOULD* mind. We should also mind that blacks and Hispanics are being converted to Islam. As long as we’re forced to live with non-white populations, it should absolutely matter to us whether those non-whites are Christian or Muslim. We have enough problems with imported Islamic terrorism and black Muslims. We don’t need Native American or Mexican jihadists added to the mix.

*Not that there’s much we can do about it.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, Muslims | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

“Hate we are most familiar with”

Posted on December 30, 2019 by jewamongyou

Black-on-Jewish violence in the New York area has been endemic for decades, if not centuries. I lived in the Northeast back in the 1970s, and used to frequent the Jewish areas of Brooklyn. I was involved with Habad (AKA Lubavitch) Hassidism at the time. Back then, blacks would target Jews frequently. In response, Jews would walk in large groups for protection. Some Hassidic groups even had a system worked out to deal with black violence. If a Satmar Hassid had trouble with a black hoodlum, he would only need to shout “Khop im! (Jump him!), and other Jews would come to his aid, beating the living daylights out of the offending hoodlum. I heard stories of Lubavitcher Hassidim beating black trouble-makers within an inch of their lives.

But in those days, crime was rife in New York. This was before the reformations of Mayor Giuliani. It was like the Wild West, and people had to look out for themselves, because nobody else would. You couldn’t count on the police to be there, or for anybody to do much about it if you reported a crime.

Since then, things have calmed down in the New York area, and my impression is that the Jews have become complacent about protecting themselves.

The recent spate of black-on-Jewish violence on the East Coast is something the Corporate Media cannot entirely ignore. A recent Atlantic article states:

Batya Unger-Sargon, the opinion editor at the Forward, put it bluntly and correctly this morning:

After the massacre at a Pittsburgh synagogue on Shabbat that killed 11 people last year, and another fatal shooting at a shul in Poway, California six months later, one often heard that the great threat to Jews—even the only threat—comes from white supremacy. Conventional wisdom said it was the political right, and the right’s avatar in the White House, that was to blame for the rising levels of hate against Jews.

But the majority of the perpetrators of the Brooklyn attacks, and the suspects in Jersey City—who were killed in a shootout with the police—and now Monsey, were not white, leaving many at a loss about how to explain it or even talk about it. There is little evidence that these attacks are ideologically motivated, at least in terms of the ideologies of hate we are most familiar with.

And therein lies the trouble with talking about the violent attacks against Orthodox Jews: At a time when ideology seems to [reign] supreme in the chattering and political classes, the return of pogroms to Jewish life on American soil transcends ideology. In the fight against anti-Semitism, you don’t get to easily blame your traditional enemies—which, in the age of Trump, is a non-starter for most people.

If Batya Unger-Sargon is “not most familiar with” black-on-Jewish violence, then the leftist media (of which she, as an editor at the Forward, is a part) is to blame. Until now, it has been loath to write about it at all; it does not fit the narrative that it so aggressively pushes. To be fair, this is the main point of the Atlantic article – but why the long wait?

Actually, the ideology behind the black-on-Jewish attacks is very familiar to the Corporate Media, it’s just that it’s only recognized when the perpetrators are white.

It’s perfectly normal, and strongly encouraged, for American blacks to be openly proud of their race. But when a white person does the same, he’s a “white-supremacist.” In other words (using leftist parlance), it’s perfectly normal for blacks to be “black-supremacists,” but an aberration for whites to be “white-supremacists.” Does Miss Unger-Sargon honestly believe that these recent crimes do not at all exist against a backdrop of black identity? That it’s completely coincidence that so many of the attackers are black?

She won’t even say it out loud; instead, describing the attackers as “not white.” We all know that they’re not Asian, or Native American. I wonder if Miss Unger-Sargon would be fired if she came out and specifically described them as “black.” Perhaps the initial draft did spell it out, but it was changed.

Miss Unger-Sargon, if you’re reading this, take note: We cannot hope to solve such problems if we continue to honor hackneyed taboos. We must tackle these issues head on, and call it what it is, without euphemisms or codes. It’s BLACK-ON-JEWISH VIOLENCE, and if you were consistent, you’d call it “black-supremacy.”

 

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, Jewish stuff and Israel, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Seattle Times: Whites are more diverse than blacks

Posted on December 27, 2019 by jewamongyou

The Seattle Times recently announced new guidelines for the usage of the terms “black” and “white.”

 Black (adj.): Belonging to people who are part of the African diaspora. Capitalize black because it is a reflection of shared cultures and experiences…

White (adj.): Belonging to people with light-colored skin, especially those of European descent. Unlike Black, it is lowercase, as its use is a physical description of people whose backgrounds may spring from many different cultures… Capitalized white is often used by the white nationalist/white supremacist movement.

Thanks to Red Ice (about 1:14) for bringing this up in their video.

This is a crude attempt to diminish the status of whites, and it fails on a couple of levels. Firstly, the fact that the Seattle Times mentions the fact that some white-advocates capitalize “white” somewhat shifts the narrative over to our side. It shows that the Times is ceding control of the narrative, as opposed to setting the narrative themselves. Had the behavior of (some) white-advocates not played a part in this decision, then it would not have been mentioned at all. I’m reminded of how Hillary Clinton inadvertently gave the Alt-Right a huge boost. As the folks at Vice described it:

With her speech, Clinton managed to elevate an ill-defined, and likely small, group of fringe racists into a national threat, giving a national platform to a handful of white nationalist bloggers and the internet trolls who follow them. The GOP is “the White Man’s party, whether it likes it or not,” Richard Spencer, the leader of the white nationalist National Policy Institute credited with coining the term alt-right wrote in a blog post Thursday. “Hillary is trying to push the GOP into permanent minority status by empowering the Alt Right,” he added, “and believe me, she will be empowering us today.”

When a “mainstream” media organization bases its policy, even partially, on the habits of the Resistance, then this is a victory for the Resistance.

Secondly, and more importantly, it negates the very message that the Hostile Elite has been shoving down our throats for decades – that white people are less diverse than non-white people. It wasn’t that long ago when Apple’s Diversity Officer, a black woman named Denise Smith, was fired for stating:

There can be 12 white, blue-eyed, blond men in a room and they’re going to be diverse too because they’re going to bring a different life experience and life perspective to the conversation.

Not according to The Seattle Times, because their directive clearly states that whites are “people whose backgrounds may spring from many different cultures,” but blacks are “of shared cultures and experiences.” In other words, whites are more diverse than blacks.

I’m not saying that leftists can’t disagree. They certainly can, and they do. But my hunch is that the folks at The Seattle Times simply did not give very much thought to the ramifications of their new guidelines. I’m willing to bet that if a Diversity officer at The Seattle Times made a similar announcement to that of Denise Smith, that officer would find himself in hot water. Defending himself by citing the new guidelines would not be very effective, because consistency is not a priority among diversicrats.

As for my own opinion on the capitalization of “white” and “black,” you can find it here.

 

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , | 2 Comments

On a lighter note

Posted on December 25, 2019 by jewamongyou

These gave me some good laughs, but maybe it’s just because I’d just finished a glass of wine… You tell me:

https://www.boredpanda.com/funny-puns-wordplay/?commentUpdated

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

An “attempt to push a preconceived narrative”

Posted on December 23, 2019 by jewamongyou

An Amazon executive was tragically killed in San Francisco recently. Her death was ironic, as Business Insider reports:

The former Amazon executive Joy Covey was killed after colliding with a van delivering Amazon packages, according to an explosive investigation into the company’s logistics network by BuzzFeed News and ProPublica.

Covey was Amazon’s first chief financial officer. She was riding her bike in San Francisco’s South Bay suburbs in 2013 when a delivery van turned left into her path…

Covey’s collision with a delivery van was previously reported, but the BuzzFeed News-ProPublica report revealed for the first time on Monday that the van was carrying Amazon packages…

The details of Covey’s death emerged as Amazon has come under scrutiny over the impacts of its growing delivery network following investigations by Business Insider, BuzzFeed News, and The New York Times, among others.

In a nutshell, Buzzfeed accused Amazon of neglecting safety in favor of speed. To this, Amazon…

… called the new report an “attempt to push a preconceived narrative that is simply untrue. Nothing is more important to us than safety.”

I’m surprised they didn’t say “Amazon is committed to safety.” Every time a large company gives lip service to something they’re supposed to prioritize, it will say “… is COMMITTED to…” Fill in the blanks.

But back to the point. I seem to remember a recent instance of somebody “pushing a preconceived narrative… Oh yes! It was Amazon – when it chose to censure all of Jared Taylor’s books.

Far be it from me to rejoice in the death of Joy Covey. I didn’t know her, and many truth-loving people would leap at the opportunity to have a job like hers, so I won’t judge her after her death – unless other pertinent information comes to light.

But I do rejoice in the fact that Buzzfeed and the New York Times have attacked Amazon; all three of them are rabid Leftist organs, and purveyors of lies. It’s even more delicious when a pusher of preconceived narratives accuses other pushers of preconceived narratives of pushing preconceived narratives.

Merry Christmas to all of you, and Happy Hannukah to all of my Jewish readers!

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Crime and punishment in “progressive” times

Posted on December 20, 2019 by jewamongyou

This is one of those posts whose main objective is therapy for yours truly. When I read about current events, and become full of disgust, venting my spleen on these pages is sometimes all I can do.

I present to you exhibit A: A man who, acting according to his conscience, lashed out against the LGBT power structure. He infringed upon the property rights of others, and for that he deserves some sort of punishment… but 16 years?! From USAToday:

DES MOINES, Iowa – An Iowa man was sentenced to about 16 years in prison after he set fire to a church LGBTQ flag in June.

Adolpho Martinez, 30, of Ames last month was found guilty of a hate crime – a class “D” felony – third-degree harassment and reckless use of fire. Police said he stole a pride banner hanging at Ames United Church of Christ and burned it early June 11 outside the Dangerous Curves Gentleman’s Club…

Story County Attorney Jessica Reynolds said hate crime charges were added because Martinez is suspected of criminal mischief against someone’s property because of “what it represents as far as sexual orientation.”

How many times have we read about Antifa physically attacking conservatives, or “social justice warriors” destroying the property of Trump supporters – and they receive, at most, a slap on the wrist. Perhaps Trump supporters should claim that they support him because he’s sexy. That way, any attack on them could be considered a “hate crime.” Maybe white-advocates should claim that our support of whites is based on our sexual attraction to them. That way, attacks on us would be “hate crimes.” We could be the “W” in LGBTQW. It’s a sexual orientation, and attacks against us will not be tolerated.

Any way you look at it, all decent people should be outraged that a man may spend 16 years in prison for burning a rainbow flag. Murderers get more lenient sentences.

And that brings me to exhibit B: The man who murdered a Jewish woman in Paris, while shouting about demons and Allah, will face NO PUNISHMENT. From the Jewish Refugees blog:

The French-Jewish community is reeling at the news that the killer of Sarah Halimi, who was tortured and thrown out of the window in 2017, will not face trial. Ben Cohen in The Algemeiner reports:
Although it was expected, the court’s decision nonetheless angered the French Jewish community — whose leaders have spent much of this year countering the claim of a court-appointed psychiatrist that Traore’s heavy ingestion of cannabis temporarily wiped out his awareness and his judgement…

The Times of Israel reports:

A man accused of murdering his Jewish neighbor in Paris will stand not trial after a French court ruled Thursday he could not be held responsible for the killing because he was in a psychotic state from smoking marijuana.

Kobili Traore is alleged to have beaten his neighbor, 66-year-old Sarah Halimi, to death in 2017 while calling her a demon and shouting about Allah, before throwing her body from the window of her third-story apartment.

The appeals court, whose decision Thursday ended Traore’s detention, ordered he be hospitalized or made to attend a drug rehabilitation program. It also ordered security measures be put in place for 20 years, including a ban on him from contacting the victim’s relatives or returning to the crime scene.

I was under the impression that marijuana does NOT cause people to become violent. In any case, now you know what to do if you want to murder somebody in France: Smoke some marijuana first.

We shouldn’t be surprised if the above “security measures” turn out to be ineffective, and Traore kills again.

It’s the “progressive” way, and it’s emblematic of the depths to which we have sunk – that murderers get a second chance, but not those who burn an LGBTQ flag.*

* Yes, I’m aware that the US, and France, have two different legal systems, but there are plenty of examples of France meting out harsh punishments for “hate speech,” and the US being too lenient with murderers.

Posted in crime and violence | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Should Jews be considered a “white nation?”

Posted on December 19, 2019 by jewamongyou

I just finished reading Greg Johnson’s “The White Nationalist Manifesto.” Instead of writing just one review on this pivotal work, I decided to discuss each point in separate posts. There are only a few things I disagree with him on – and most of those are along the lines of “let’s examine this more closely, and maybe rethink this.”

Johnson writes (pg. 20):

Second, Jews are a highly influential minority in politics, the media, business, academia, and the professions. Jews are, moreover among the principal promoters of trends conducive to white genocide, such as massive non-white immigration, racial integration, miscegenation, feminism, and sexual liberation. Jewish organizations have also led the way in demonizing all pro-white ethnic activism as “hate…”

I can’t find the source right now, but the ancient Jewish sages stated, “If not for the Torah, Jews would destroy the world.”

All of the crimes, perpetrated by Jews upon white peoples, were perpetrated by Jews without Torah, that is to say, secular Jews. It is secular Jews who are “destroying the world.”

In The Ashkenazi Revolution, Kalman Katzenelson argues that there is no singular “Jewish People,” but rather, a confederation of Jewish peoples. His arguments are based on disparate histories and, by extension, disparate ethnicities/peoples.

There is much overlap, ethnically, between secular Jews and religious (IE. Orthodox) Jews. Through rampant intermarriage, among secular Jews, this overlap is diminishing. Ideologically, the two groups could not be further apart. Secular Jews are, as a group, just as religious as Orthodox Jews, but their religion is Cultural Marxism.

Johnson writes (pg. 92):

It is impossible for non-whites to become members of other white societies. It is difficult for whites to become members of other white societies. It is easier, of course, if an immigrant and his new homeland share the same native tongue and basic culture – for instance, the countries of the Anglosphere.

The transition, from Orthodox Jew to Cultural Marxist Jew is not an easy one. I suspect, however, that it’s easier than the transition to Conservatism, or nationalism. There are serious psychological, and social, hurdles that stand in the way. One’s family may disown him.

Johnson makes it clear, in several places, that there are many “white nations.” There is no such thing as a “generic white.” Why not consider Orthodox Jews to be one of those nations?

One question that Johnson does not address, in this tome, is “What is a Jew?” Of course, racially speaking, the vast majority of Ashkenazic, and Sephardic, Jews are white. They are indistinguishable from other Europeans, though some of us retain Mediterranean features. The main objection to Jews being “white” is ideological, not racial. But this objection only applies to SECULAR JEWS. Most Orthodox Jews are quite conservative; their lifestyle is a wholesome one, they are a high-IQ, low-crime, pro-family-values demographic.

One may object to some Orthodox practices, such as circumcision, but similar objections could be raised about Jehovah’s Witnesses. Are Jehovah’s Witnesses “non-whites?” Russians have issues with corruption and alcoholism. Are these grounds for being excluded from whiteness? In Western Europe, and America, most whites are self-loathing. We seek to address this by changing their minds, not be excluding them from whiteness.

Clannishness, and an unwillingness to intermarry, is one issue that some have with Orthodox Jews. Johnson writes (pg. 90):

What should our attitude be toward people from other white nations?

Ethnonationalists with to preserve distinct European cultures and subracial types, which is the whole point of having distinct homelands in the first place. We do not want to see the emergence of a homogeneous European man or a white monoculture. Therefore, policies toward other white nations must bear this goal in mind…

No white society should allow large populations of guest workers from other white societies, or create conditions that lead to large numbers of its own people to search for work abroad.

Immigration between white societies should be limited. Practically all cases would be due to marriage. The naturalization process should firmly promote normative homogeneity, i.e., assimilation of the dominant language and culture by immigrants…

Regarding the last paragraph, it sounds a lot like conversion.

Because there is no official ETHNIC distinction between religious Jews and secular Jews, when there is an attack upon one group, members of the other group often also feel the pain. When one group is extolled, the other group may also feel pride. Sometimes, the two groups mingle, or join forces. This does not make them the same – any more so than alliances between Jews and gentiles would make them the same.

Orthodox Judaism does not consider secular Jews to be fully Jews. Secular Jews cannot be counted in a quorum for prayer services, and if a secular Jew handles (uncooked) wine, that wine is no longer kosher. In practice, Orthodox Jews treat secular Jews with kindness and respect. This is partly because most Orthodox Jews are nice people, and doing so comes naturally to them, and it’s partly because doing so may draw secular Jews back into the fold. But the fact remains that secular Jews do not hold full “Jewish” status. This is based on behavior, not genetics.

In the same way, white-nationalists should consider Orthodox Jews as “white.” But once an Orthodox Jew strays from his roots, and embraces Cultural Marxism instead, he loses his “white” status – because now he is dangerous, and cannot be trusted. At that point, he’ll join forces with other Cultural Marxists, and seek to destroy the world.

Edit: I wanted to ask my fellow, non-Jewish, white-nationalists about their thoughts on gentiles who convert to Judaism. Do they lose their status as “whites?”

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links, Jewish stuff and Israel, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 3 Comments