Tit for tat

Posted on July 17, 2011 by jewamongyou

A Colorado woman is being charged with felony sexual abuse for groping the breast of a TSA agent.  According to Yahoo news:

PHOENIX (AP) — Authorities say a Colorado woman who allegedly groped a female Transportation Security Administration agent at Phoenix’s international airport is facing a felony count of sexual abuse.

Phoenix police say 61-year-old Yukari Mihamae is accused of grabbing the left breast of the unidentified TSA agent Thursday afternoon at an airport checkpoint.

TSA staff say Mihamae refused to be go through passenger screening and became argumentative before she squeezed and twisted the agent’s breast with both hands.

I think what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.  If TSA agents can grope us, then we should be allowed to grope them as well.  Not only that, but we should get paid for it.  Give this woman an award!  She had the nerve to do what many of us only fantasize about.
As for the “sexual assault”, from what I can gather, there was nothing sexual about it.  She was making a political statement – and she chose to do so, appropriately enough, through another woman’s breast.  Just because breasts are often viewed sexually does not automatically mean that Mihamae’s action was sexual in nature, any more so than breast-feeding an infant is the sexual molestation of a child.
If Mihamae is an immigrant from Japan, then this is the sort of immigration we need.  She appears to be more American than 99% of the rest of us.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, libertarian thought | 6 Comments

Fast food and diversity

Posted on July 17, 2011 by jewamongyou

Sometimes it seems as if an entire generation of Americans is growing up without any knowledge of cooking.  Many young Americans would probably starve if all the fast food joints closed down.  They wouldn’t have a clue how to make their own french fries, burger or taco.  They’ll continue to patronize the same establishments, even as they complain that “they never seem to get it right; I specifically said to leave out the tomato!”  In their eyes, there are only two options:  Ordering prepared food or going hungry.
This attitude goes hand in hand with the “I want it now” mentality so many of us have grown accustomed to.  It’s the reason so many minimum-wage workers live off of vending machines and convenience stores rather than take the cheaper, and healthier, route of preparing their own food from what they buy at discount grocery outlets.  There was a time when Americans took pride not only in cooking their own meals, but even in growing it themselves.  These days, not many can honestly make that claim, nor is it even practical for city-dwellers to do so.
The “I want it now” attitude also applies to matters other than food.  For example, diversity.  When I want to experience cultural/ racial diversity, I travel to other parts of the world.  But this approach will never do for generation “I want it now”.  They expect diversity to be delivered to their doorstep, like a pizza or Chinese food.  Why go to China when “Chinese” is only a phone-call away?  Why go to Mexico when “Mexican” is only a phone-call away?
It is possible that the affluent leftist elite looks upon third-world immigration, and ethnic neighborhoods, as a convenience.  Perhaps some of them see it as a way of saving the expense, and inconvenience, of travel.  I think this attitude exists among rank and file leftists, while the elites have more nefarious motives.
So many things that used to be the privilege of the well-to-do are now available to the common man.   I am grateful that most of us can now enjoy the finer things in life, that the poor among us needn’t live in mud huts and subsist on gruel.  That we can all enjoy the music we like anywhere we wish.  That we have cheap meat, three dollar bottles of wine and plentiful antibiotics.  But please, do not import “diversity” to our doorsteps.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics | 5 Comments

Gay curriculum in California

Posted on July 15, 2011 by jewamongyou

It turns out that the gay curriculum law I blogged about recently has been signed into law (thanks to Mangan for the link):

Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation Thursday that makes California the first state in the nation to require the inclusion of the contributions of gay, lesbian and transgender Americans in school history lessons and textbooks.

This might put homosexuals on the same trajectory as blacks and Hispanics.  At least it puts them on the same trajectory as women.  I cannot help but wonder how long it will be before we have homosexual quotas that must be filled.  Will people feel pressured to include “I am a homosexual” on their college and job applications?  Or perhaps subtle hints, craftily inserted into their personal essays, would be more acceptable.
I personally know of a person who got preferential treatment for being a transsexual.  She was horrible at her job, cost the company a fortune – and yet, when they finally had the courage to let her go, she got (reputedly) a huge severance package so she wouldn’t sue for discrimination.  Granted, there is a difference between a transsexual and a homosexual – but they both have to do with sexuality and they are both considered “protected classes”.  This means any situation, that might even remotely be construed as discrimination, or harassment, must be avoided.
The very idea of quotas for homosexuals leads one to wonder… just who would be responsible for determining the validity of a candidate’s homosexuality?  Images come to mind – of well-furnished offices, inhabited by the “experts” on homosexuality, whose job it would be to verify such claims.  Competition for such positions would be fierce.  All of the secretaries would know not to disturb such important meetings.
One day we would have a homosexual president, who would appoint like-minded “czars” in strategic positions.  High-level military positions would be subject to the homosexual quota – and we can only imagine the abuses that might transpire in places like the armed forces.
Far-fetched?  Not really; there is precedence.

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 8 Comments

We have the advantage in the streets

Posted on July 14, 2011 by jewamongyou

There is only so much that can be done in the blogosphere; each blog has its readers – and the occasional drifter – but even a million pro-white, conservative, blogs are not going to bring about meaningful change.  Those of you who have not yet taken to the streets to distribute flyers, to protest, to speak to people face to face – even though there is nothing stopping you* –  I hope you feel guilty about that.  Guilty enough to motivate you to do something meaningful in the real world.
Once we get people out in the streets and spreading the message, we have the upper hand over the forces of evil.  Why?  Because the general public is exposed to leftist messages, explicit and subliminal,  seven days a week, 365 days a year, from dawn to dusk.  It’s all they know, it’s all they hear, and it’s all they see.  Any deviation from their strict leftist diet is sure to be noticed.  It will make an impression and, even though they may not agree with what you tell them today, they will remember it.   The little light you created in their world may remain dormant, but someday it may come to fruition.
In contrast, the forces of evil (AKA “the left”) has no such advantage.  If they put out flyers that say “celebrate diversity”, it will have about as much impact as pissing in the ocean.  People will nod and say, “yeah dude.  Whatever.”  That flyer, or conversation, will soon be forgotten.
Ours is the advantage of the underdog, to be sure, but an advantage it is – and we would be fools to not take advantage of it.
 
*Street activism is not for everyone; you might have health issues, family issues, professional issues etc. that prevent you from participating.   The same could be said for any revolution.  It is up to you to recognize an “excuse” from a real limitation in your life.

Posted in activism | 15 Comments

The end of the world: Nibiru

Posted on July 13, 2011 by jewamongyou

The folks at anti-Jewish sites and forums have been demanding that I reveal the Jewish plan for world domination.  So I shall finally oblige them and reveal our evil plot.
Using special Jewish Kabbalistic powers, we have been plotting to destroy the world through the rogue planet Nibiru.  With this Kabbalistic power, we have brought the orbit of Nibiru, itself a Jewish invention, dangerously close to that of Earth.
The name “Nibiru” is a compound word that comes from “Negro” and “Hebrew”.  For the forces of brutish darkness, combined with the forces of diabolical genius, are unstoppable.  Oh, I almost forgot:  MWAHAHAHA!
When Nibiru approaches Earth, devastating earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tidal floods will bring death and mayhem upon Earth’s unsuspecting population.  These phenomena have already been described at length.  What has not been described is the catastrophic effects this event will have on interest rates.  We Jews have it all figured out – and we have already guaranteed vast profits for the Jewish bankers.  MWAHAHAHA!
At the same time, hordes of negroes and Mexicans will be unleashed upon the white middle class.  Those who survive will be enslaved.  But, using Jewish power, we will be able to tame the beast and the Jews will be spared.  In fact, when the dust settles, everybody, including those blacks and Mexicans will be our slaves.  MWAHAHAHA!
In case you were wondering about the “coincidence” of the Mayan calendar ending in 2012, it is no coincidence.  At first, the Mayans were our useful allies, but then they missed a tribute payment.  So we sent the Spaniards against them.  The rest is history.  MWAHAHAHA!

Nibiru:  A Jewish conspiracy

MWAHAHAHA!

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, parody/satire | 16 Comments

Practical tips for Mivtzoyim*

Posted on July 12, 2011 by jewamongyou

Yesterday I went door to door again distributing some flyers.  It was a two-sided flyer this time.  One side had my updated “Stop the Hatred” flyer while the other featured one of Unamusement Park’s recent creations.  Here’s the updated “Stop the Hatred” flyer (please edit the part about Portland according to whatever city you’re in):

STOP THE HATE

TAKE A STAND AGAINST ANTI-WHITE BIGOTRY AND VIOLENCE

Certainly you have heard of the recent, racially-motivated mob attacks in Chicago against whites, the savage beating, by racist blacks, of Carter Strange in South Carolina, the anti-white pogroms in Philadelphia and Milwaukee and the brutal beating, by blacks, of white transgender Crissy Polis in Baltimore.  On the reverse is a description of one of these recent attacks.
All of the above incidents, and many more, occurred within the last few months.  If you haven’t heard of them, it is because you get your “news” from a media that does not want you to know about them.  You will know about them when such attacks become common in the Portland area as well.
Interracial crime is overwhelmingly black on white, or black on Asian.  The Justice department tries to distort this fact by counting Hispanics as “white” when they are perpetrators, but as “Hispanic” when they are victims.  Even so, the trends are clear.  White people are being victimized, because of their race, all over the country.
It is high time that whites grow a backbone and stand up for their group rights – just as every other race, and ethnicity, has done.  It is time to stop being ashamed of your own heritage, to tell your teachers, college professors and the media – most of whom openly hate whites as a race – to keep their hatred to themselves and to stop infecting vulnerable young people with self-loathing.
When you hear the following expressions, and words, from the powers that be, here is what they actually mean:
“Affirmative Action” = anti-white discrimination
“Diversity” = the denial of freedom of association for whites and the destruction of white societies as cohesive communities.
“Hate Crime” (in the racial context) = a crime committed by whites against non-whites.
“Not a Hate Crime” = a crime committed by non-whites against whites, even when racial epithets are used.
“Racist” = a white person.

Here’s the link to Unamusement Park’s flyer.  I took Unamusement Park’s advice and left out my URL.  His reasoning was that as soon as people visit the site, they’ll see that its author believes in innate racial differences in I.Q.  At that point, mental paralysis sets in and they cannot digest any information.
Here are some practical tips:  If you don’t already have a laser printer, order a Brother HL2240D from Costco online.  This printer should cost you only about $100.  It has duplex capabilities, making it a lot easier to do what I did yesterday – printing on both sides of the page without any confusion or mess-ups.  Don’t get caught without extra toner, but don’t order your extra cartridge from Costco.  Shop around for the toner.  I got mine from shop4tech and paid about half of what Costco wanted.  If you don’t already have a USB cable, order it online from newegg.com of a similar site.  They cost way too much through retail.  When you are ready to print your flyers, go into the print options and select “toner saving mode”; it will save you money and the quality is easily good enough.  Don’t print all 50, or 100 flyers yet.  First print just one and make sure it comes out okay.
Now that you’ve got your flyers printed, dress appropriately, shave, shower and look presentable.  Always look for “no soliciting” signs.  When you see one, skip that house.  Don’t take shortcuts through people’s lawns or gardens.  If you’re self-conscious, there’s nothing wrong with skipping houses where people are out front.
Warning:  Do not put flyers in people’s mailboxes.  It is illegal and you could get into serious trouble.
After you have distributed all your flyers, treat yourself to some summer fruit and ice-cream or cold watermelon.  You’ve earned it!
*”Mivstoyim” is the Habad-Lubavitch term for public/street activism.  I have adopted the term because it’s appropriate and because I’d like to co-opt  it to mean the specifically pro-white activism I encourage in this blog.

Posted in activism | 64 Comments

The Ainu – the "other" white people

Posted on July 11, 2011 by jewamongyou

It is almost indisputable that the Japanese were guilty of genocide against the Ainu inhabitants of the far North.  In enotes, under “Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity”, we find:

Japanese employed different discriminatory policies towards its ethnic minorities, who were located at the country’s geographical margins (Hokkaido in the north and Okinawa in the south). Once again, domestic and international political pressures converged, this time in the context of establishing a modern nation-state. The Ainu, who comprised the indigenous population of northeastern Honshu, Hokkaido, and the adjacent islands (the Kurils and southern Sakhalin), began to be recognized as a distinct ethnic group only in the sixteenth century. At that time, the Tokugawa shogunate designated Hokkaido a buffer zone vis-à-vis Northeast Asian areas with which the Ainu had once formed an autonomous trading region. This was accomplished by the gradual conversion of much of the Ainu hunting and gathering economy into forced dependency on Japanese contract-fishing. An unintended outcome of this policy was the introduction of new diseases such as smallpox, which reached epidemic proportions in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Yet it was the Meiji state’s perceived need to secure Hokkaido as Japanese territory against Russian interests that underlay its aggressive policy of assimilation through deculturation. Begun in 1871, and institutionalized by the Hokkaido Former Natives Protection Act of 1899, the Meiji colonization project systematically eliminated the Ainu language, religion, customs (i.e., tattooing and wearing earrings), and lifestyles. Land redistribution, often accompanied by forced relocation, made Ainu into impoverished agriculturists indentured to Japanese immigrant landowners. The Ainu were classified as imperial subjects, whose decreasing numbers distinguished them in public discourse as a “dying race.” From approximately 80,000 in the early eighteenth century, the Ainu population had decreased to 16,000 by 1873, accounting for 14.63 percent of the total population in Hokkaido. By 1939, they constituted only 0.54 percent of Hokkaido’s population, even though the actual number of Ainu, now heavily intermarried with Japanese, remained about the same. In the later decades of the twentieth century, an Ainu ethnopolitical movement began to address this historical treatment. The adoption of the Ainu New Law in 1984 marks the viability of the movement, which recognizes the genocidal quality of Japanese policy towards the Ainu and forges links with a worldwide indigenous peoples’ movement.

Here we find many components of genocide:  Disenfranchisement, violence, serfdom, repression of their language and customs, unfair laws and marginalization.  But, unpleasant as these things were, and painful as they must be to contemplate, they are all reversible.  The one thing that is not reversible is the “heavily intermarried with Japanese” part.
One contemporary Ainu, himself married to a Japanese, admits that American-style reservations would not work because…

“There is lots and lots of mixed blood between Ainu and Japanese. I feel it is very difficult to claim land, to say, `This used to be our land.'”

In other words, how can a people lay claim to a land, when there is no longer a distinct people?  Perhaps the goal of Ainu activists is merely to preserve Ainu language as an academic language, like Latin or ancient Greek, and to preserve Ainu customs merely so that people whose great grandfather was an Ainu can dust off their traditional garb and show it off a couple of times a year on special occasions.  When a man, who claims to be an “Ainu activist” marries a non-Ainu, I would say that the Japanese have succeeded in their genocide of this people.
To the extent that there are any real Ainu left, should the pro-white movements show concern, and solidarity, for them?  Perhaps we can arrange for a shipment of hairy whites* to be imported to Hokkaido, declare themselves “Ainu”, learn the Ainu language and culture and, voila!  The Ainu people will have been reborn.
* Yes, I know there is controversy about any relationship they may have to Europeans.  It’s a joke.

Posted in miscegenation, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 3 Comments

What are they really trying to say?

Posted on July 9, 2011 by jewamongyou

Regular readers of this blog already know that there is no colorblindness within the mainstream media, just as there is no gender-blindness.  When a “person of color” is shown, it is because the producers specifically wanted a “person of color”.  Though they like to claim that chance plays a role in their racial choices, they are clearly lying.
Nevertheless, we might entertain the thought that, though their racial selections were deliberate, they still play only a secondary role.  In other words, we might believe that the organization in question is primarily interested in selling you their product – but they also have a secondary goal of infusing you with multiracial piety (or of avoiding trouble).
With the full understanding that each organization is different, and not all leftists are the same, I submit that there are times when the primary goal is to infuse us with multiracial piety, and the apparent primary goal is actually only secondary.
If we pay attention to cases where we know, for a fact, that the organization in question is sincere about their apparent primary goal, we can learn from them.  For example, in a recent Oregonian article about violence against gays, we are treated to the following example of the billboards they put up:

Notice that there are five couples depicted – but not one of them is mixed race.  Of course, it is possible that these just happen to be the couples that volunteered to have their pictures shown.  But it is also possible that the Cascade AIDS project, which is responsible for putting up the billboards, did not want race to be a distraction from the important message they wanted to convey:  Do not attack gays!  It’s dangerous; if their blood gets on you, you could get AIDS! (just kidding).
Government agencies are required (I’m fairly certain) to depict the “right” racial mix in their publications.  So we cannot learn anything from them that we don’t already know.  But we can certainly learn from cases where there is a choice.  There is also a possibility that gay organizations are not as worried about depicting blacks or Hispanics because they are less fearful of attacks from the left.  But then we would have to assume that gay organizations only include “people of color” out of fear, that they do not actually accept the multiracial agenda.  I do not think this is the case.
Am I suggesting that all the companies, that show blacks or Hispanics on their billboards, are not primarily interested in profit?  Not at all.  Merely showing “people of color” on billboards is not a hot button issue; they can easily promote their (secondary) multiracial agenda without much risk to the bottom line.  Very few people get upset over this.  Mixed-race couples are a hot button issue.  So if they are depicted, there is a very good reason for it.  By paying attention to where they are not depicted, we can gain some insight as to true motivation.

Posted in examples of propaganda | 5 Comments

Racialist spillover to anti-Islamism

Posted on July 8, 2011 by jewamongyou

Very few of us, relatively speaking, are race-conscious.  Whether in Europe or the U.S., our numbers are small – practically negligible.  The taboos against speaking the truth about race are very strong.  Too strong for most people to even entertain the thought.
A step down from race-realists are the “conservatives”.  Many of them are Christian.  Some are atheist.  Yet others are Jewish (or both Jewish and atheist).  These “conservatives” often entertain race-realist ideas in their subconscious.  Some of them are even aware of these thoughts, but dare not speak them.  At a certain level, in their psyches, they know that their own race, the white race, is in grave danger.  At some level, they identify with their own race.  But they cannot put into words what they are thinking.  It is too dangerous – not just for their family, their jobs or their social circles, but even for themselves.  They would consider themselves bad people if they even acknowledged their own deepest thoughts.  This fear and loathing needs an outlet of some sort.
This is where Islam comes in.  As politically incorrect as it may be to criticize Islam, it is not nearly as taboo as criticizing another race – such as blacks or Mestizos.  The conservatives, described above, take their suppressed fear and loathing of blacks and/or Mestizos and project it onto Muslims.  This is not to say that there is nothing to fear or loath about Islam.  But I do believe that some of the vitriol, directed toward Islam, should be directed at the invading alien races.  Geert Wilders was acquitted of attacking Islam – but he would never have been acquitted of attacking blacks.  Most likely, Wilder does not recognized the dangers of massive black immigration into Europe.  Even if he did, he would not say so.  But there can be little doubt that many who support him do understand what is at stake.  They oppose all non-white immigration into Europe, but Islam provides a (somewhat) permissible guise to rally under.  And there are, of course, those who do not understand what they understand.  The Left seems to appreciate this, which is why they often refer to anti-Muslim sentiments as “racism”.  We should bear this in mind when we are told that “Geert is not our friend”.  Perhaps not, but many of his followers surely are, whether they realize it or not.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 15 Comments

California school curriculum requirements

Posted on July 7, 2011 by jewamongyou

California is on its way to requiring that “gay history” be taught in public schools.  From the Huffington Post:

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California lawmakers on Tuesday sent the governor a bill that would make the state the first requiring public schools to include the contributions of gays and lesbians in social studies curriculum.
The bill, passed on a party-line vote, adds lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people as well as people with disabilities to the list of groups that schools must include in the lessons. It also would prohibit material that reflects adversely on gays.
Democratic Assemblyman Tom Ammiano of San Francisco says SB48 is crucial because of the bullying that happens to gay students. Republicans called it a well-intentioned but ill-conceived bill and raised concerns that it would indoctrinate children to accept homosexuality.

There is so much wrong with this, it is difficult to know where to start.  Firstly, it is hard to comprehend how anybody could justify the following hypothetical dialog:
Teacher:  “Today we will learn about the accomplishments of Alan Turing.  Mr. Turing was not only a great man who served his country – he was also GAY“.
Little Johnny:  “What’s gay?”
Teacher:  “Excellent question!  A gay person is…”
For God’s sake.  Let the children grow up before they must deal with such issues.  As for Ammiano’s concern about bullying, it is easy to see how such discussions could bring about more bullying than would be the case if they were silent about it.
We could argue the pros and cons until we’re red in the face, but by now it should be obvious that there are far too many special interests to please them all by cramming their views into the heads of innocent little children.  This case supports my contention that government should not be in the business of educating children at all.  This is the inevitable result when every group, in a fractured (excuse me, “diverse”) society, is given a say in the curriculum of public schools.  Where there is “multiculturalism”, there will also be “multi-curriculumism”.  When there are thousands of different ethnic groups, religions and sexual groups that all demand their stories be told, how can there still be enough time and resources to teach reading, writing and arithmetic?
Tom Ammiano says “gay history” should be taught to students because gays are bullied.   What about fat children?  What about children with freckles?  What about short children?  What about European American children?  Actually, according to the Huffington Post, California schools are already required to teach about European Americans:

California law already requires schools to teach about women, African Americans, Mexican Americans, entrepreneurs, Asian Americans, European Americans, American Indians and labor. The Legislature over the years also has prescribed specific lessons about the Irish potato famine and the Holocaust, among other topics.

I wonder if this is actually done – or do they simply teach about George Washington (for example) and leave it at that, excusing themselves from teaching more by saying, “he was a European American, wasn’t he?”  Perhaps some of our Californian readers, with children in public schools, would enlighten the rest of us.

Posted in libertarian thought, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 10 Comments