A feeble attempt at debunking HBD

Posted on June 25, 2011 by jewamongyou

A blogger named Zek Evets, or one of his followers, posted a link to a race-denialist version of my treatise “Reflections of a ‘Racist’ Father” as a comment to my last post.  Following the link brought me to Evets’ blog and to his pathetic attempt to debunk common sense.
Here is the link to his “Racist Father” essay.  As you can plainly see, there are plenty of assumptions therein.  He assumes that only blacks experience daily racism, that “raising a black man” is a task more special than simply “raising a man”, that somehow the offspring of a Jewish man and a black woman will carry on his Jewish heritage in a meaningful way.  And how many Jewish men marry black women anyway?  I don’t like insulting people for no reason, and I don’t take pleasure in demeaning others for the pleasure of my readers – but I’ll be blunt:  Evets excels at rhetoric.  He’s a good writer.  His words sound nice and they stir the heart.  But is he saying anything of substance?  All I see is a jumble of conflicting emotions, with no novel concepts, no statistics, very little wisdom and a lot of fluff.  If, hypothetically, I had a child with a black women, would I love that child?  Of course I would – and I would raise him as best I could.  I would raise him to be a good man.  But I would not worry about raising him to be a black man.  I suppose this is one of the points where Evets and I differ.  I place a lot of emphasis on my Jewish heritage and its future.  He places a lot of emphasis on black heritage and its future.  I don’t understand why he sees black heritage as more important than his own Jewish heritage.   After all, for every Jew, there are millions of blacks.
As for his attempt to debunk common sense (AKA HBD), here’s the comment I posted on his blog:

It’s hard to tell if you are ignorant or trying to mislead people. But no, race does not affect your I.Q. Rather, there is a correlation between AVERAGE I.Q. and the geographical area your ancestors evolved in. You make it sound as if a black genius is actually a bit dumber as a result of being black. Individuals are what they are.
Your list of race-realist scientists conveniently left out Armond Leroi – who IS a molecular biologist. You should read some of his work.
You should also check out my review of Guns, Germs and Steel; that book does NOTHING to refute race-realism.
The Mismeasurement of Man has already been shown to be fraudulent and it’s hard to believe you don’t already know this.
The Bell Curve was never disproved; it was attacked – by people like you, but this does not disprove it. You do realize that there have been plenty of counterattacks defending the work, don’t you?
Your cute cartoons and insults might convince a simple-minded person, but they are, in the end, only cartoons and insults.

Of course, much more could be said about it – but I doubt whether it’s worth the effort since his underlying objection to HBD is emotional.  Maybe he should visit Chicago and let some diversity beat some sense into him.
Now that I have vented my spleen, I’ll point out that Evets appears to be young.  When I was his age, I didn’t know any better either.  Well… maybe I did, but not that much better.  Hopefully, some day he’ll grow up and learn to see things for what they are, and not what he thinks they should be.
 
 

Posted in shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 21 Comments

Geert Wilders found not guilty

Posted on June 24, 2011 by jewamongyou

The verdict is finally in and Wilders has been acquitted of all charges.  It is only a partial victory, as the outcome does not actually guarantee freedom of speech.  The Australian reports:

At the end of his trial, prosecutors again called for the charges to be dropped, saying that although his comments may have caused anxiety and insult, they were not criminal, as they criticised Islam as a religion and not Muslims as a people…
Bram Moszkowicz, the lawyer for Mr Wilders, said: “A politician, in the context of public debate, can say a little more and go a bit farther than you and I.”

So… the Dutch are still not free to criticize Muslims as “a people” and politicians enjoy more freedom of speech than regular citizens.  I am not happy with such distinctions.  I am happy that Wilders’  lawyer appears to be Jewish.
Al-Jazeera reports:

The judge interpreted Wilders’ remarks as challenging Islam as an ideology, which is not a criminal offence in the Netherlands. “[…] although gross and degenerating, it did not give rise to hatred,” the judge said.

So… it is not legal to challenge Islam as a religion, only as an ideology.  Again, I am not happy with this distinction.
In any event, now we can look forward to the reaction from Muslims around the world:  Rioting, burning, killing and threats against the Dutch and other non-Muslims – all underscoring exactly what Wilders has been saying all along.

Posted in freedom of speech issues | 8 Comments

Reparations for the victims of North Carolina's eugenics program

Posted on June 24, 2011 by jewamongyou

Charles, who sometimes comments on the blog, sent me this link to an Al-Jazeera article.  The article reads, in part:

The US state of North Carolina has apologised to thousands of people who were forcibly sterilised under a programme undertaken to improve the genetic composition of the population.
Now the victims have come forward to tell their stories to a state advisory panel that is considering how to compensate them. But money cannot heal the scars, some say.

… and it includes a video showing a victim being interviewed.  The woman tells us that the state “took away something that was not their’s to take away”.  I agree with her.  The government should not have the authority to decide who may procreate and who may not.   But the video is misleading; it claims that the state’s eugenics program ended in 1977.  Technically, this is true.  There is no more eugenics program.  In its stead, they have a dysgenics program – just like every other state in the U.S. and the Federal Government.  This dysgenics program is, of course, their brazen robbery of the middle-class and the use of these stolen monies to subsidize lower-I.Q. people.  Though they’re not cutting people open to surgically sterilize them, the results are the same:  Responsible, hard-working people cannot afford to have their own children because so much of their income is being diverted to pay for the children of inferior people (generally speaking).
So, Charles, I am not against eugenics.  It is just government eugenics that I do not trust.  But, as long as government keeps its grubby hands off our money, natural (free-market) eugenics will work its magic.  It was, after all, natural eugenics that created the miracle we now call “Homo Sapiens Sapiens”.
As for genuinely mentally defective people, as long as they are a burden on others, they have no right to have children and they should be sterilized.  If they can support themselves, then they should be left alone.  Granted, more defective people will be born – but, overall, it will all come out in the wash.

Posted in libertarian thought | 8 Comments

Who loves the Mestizo?

Posted on June 23, 2011 by jewamongyou

I’ve been reading Jared Taylor’s book, “White Identity” and, though little of it is news to me, it does remind me of many things and, going through the section on Hispanics, I was amazed at how much loyalty Mexican-Americans have for Mexico.  More specifically, how much loyalty they have for their own (mongrel) race.  My own personal experiences with Mexicans validates everything Taylor writes.  I’ve seen the “Brown Pride” tattoos, the Mexican flags and the various bumper-stickers that announce the driver’s racial loyalties.
I’ve often wondered about these loyalties because it seems to me they are not compatible.  Either they can be loyal to the Mexican government/state or they can be loyal to their (mongrel) Mestizo/brown race but not both.  The reason is that Mexico, as a state and government, has treated its Indians and Mestizos poorly.  Steve Sailer, back in 2000, wrote a column about how the Mexican elite is quite white, while the underclass is brown.  He writes:

Mestizo nations like Mexico and mulatto nations like Brazil are bywords for vast concentrations of wealth among the white ruling class contrasted with extreme poverty among the darkest citizens. In fact, in Mexico racial segregation is worsening.

What Americans don’t comprehend is that, although Mexico doesn’t have a Color Line, it has an insidious Color Continuum. Latin American immigration will push us toward an even more extensive racial caste system than the white-black gap that has so long troubled us.

Indeed, it is difficult to watch Mexican television without noticing the dearth of brown faces in positive roles.  In other words, brown people in Mexico are marginalized.  As Sailer points out, everybody is considered “Mestizo” in Mexico and this is how they get away with it; there is no official distinction between “light-skinned Mestizos” and “dark-skinned Mestizos”.

In contrast, practically all Mexicans in the U.S. are brown.  When they demand, and get, representation on television what they mean is that they want more brown faces in positive roles.  How is the U.S. doing, in striving for this goal?  With scores of Hispanic interest, and lobbying, groups, it should be no surprise that the U.S. has many Hispanic-specific television stations, radio stations and printed media.  If Mexican Mestizo kids love the American Dora the Explorer, perhaps it’s because the Mexican version would have been blonde.

The University of Michigan has its own Hispanic webpage and, according to their section “Latino Portrayals in the Media“…

When Latinos are actually present in different forms of media a very consistent type of Latino is portrayed. Usually it is a person who has darker features, tanner skin, and an accent.  The quest for a heterogeneous type of Latino completely overlooks the diversity that is included under the umbrella term.  The lack of range in how Latinos are presented phenotypically also helps to polarize the community by showing usually either rich Latinos or poor Latinos.

The University of Michigan site seems to be going out of its way to find the negative, while neglecting the positive:  That Mestizos in America are getting the attention they lack in their home countries.  Not surprisingly, the University of Michigan site claims that there are not enough Hispanic faces in mainstream television – but experience shows that there can never be enough.  Even if every single character on television were Hispanic, they would still find reason to complain.  The same is true of blacks.  Any way you look at it, the U.S. media has been making an effort to include Mestizos in its programming.  Can the same be said for the Mexican media?

How did Mexico become a “nation of Mestizos”?  The story of the Mestizo is not a story of love, but of conquest and persecution.  What is the historic background of race-mixing in Mexico and what were the results?  Arturo Aldama tells us that Mexico had a formal caste system for a long time:

The Caste System

Shortly after the fall of Tenochtitilán in 1521, when the Spaniards assumed political control of Mexico or what they referred to as La Nueva Espana (New Spain), a social system had to be established to control its population of ever-growing mestizas and mestizos. This process of societal organization based on perceived racial mixture of Spanish, African, and indigenous peoples is called the caste system, which officially lasted into the middle of the eighteenth century. In Mexico the caste system had a total of fifty-three racial categories that structured a racial pyramid of privilege and status in the mestizo societies. The positions that occupied the top of the racial pyramids were the criollos and peninsulares. The former referred to people of Spanish descent born in New Spain, and the latter represented Spaniards who were born in Spain, those who occupied the apex of society until the Mexican Revolution in 1810. In this caste system the mestizo was born of an indigenous mother and a Spanish father. The castizo was a product of a Spanish father and a mestizo mother. The birth that resulted from an African mother and a Spanish father was called a mulatto, which stems from the word “mule” and has the connotations of a sterile hybrid. At the bottom of the racial pyramid of mestizaje are Indios or Indians, and the very bottom of the social pool refers to people with both African and indigenous ancestries, called lobos or wolfs. Each of these racial categories limited how people spoke and dressed, the types of occupations they could hold, and their ensuing legal rights. Criollos and peninsulares had full access to schools and landownership and held administrative positions in the colonial society. Lobos were relegated to raw manual labor in slavelike conditions. These caste designations usually were given during the baptism of newborn children. The caste determinations would imprint that person for the rest of his or her life, causing many parents to want their children to occupy a higher caste and in some cases to bribe the priest to give their children a higher caste.

He goes on to explain how the current situation in Mexico has its roots in that caste system:

The caste system was legally dissolved in the 1821–1826 period when Mexico won its independence from Spain. The ideals of racial equality—Mexicans seeing themselves as part of what José Vasconcelos and others call the raza cosmica, “the cosmic race,”—and the revalorization of the indigenous past and present in Mexico were celebrated in 1920s to the 1940s with the abundance of public art, music, dance, and literature. However, the prejudices of the caste system are still seen in Mexico and in the rest of Latin America and the Caribbean. The mainstream media, film, and television industries, the government, managerial positions, financial institutions, and large-acreage latifundios are still dominated by a numerically small minority of blancos (whites). The majority of the population who are more indigenous and African in history and appearance still occupy the lower social strata. The darker skinned and more indigenous and African mestizas and mestizos are still seen as ugly, backward, criminal, and even savage. Their lighter skinned counterparts carry the historical legacy of being considered gente de razón (people of reason), naturalizing through skin color and ancestry their positions of power in Latino societies.

The very victims of the above caste system, the Mestizos, migrate to the U.S. (some might say to “flee persecution in Mexico”), where the relatively new caste system has whites at the bottom of the totem pole and “people of color” (increasingly Hispanic) at the top.  We would think that these newcomers would have nothing but disdain for their home country, and that they would become loyal citizens of their new country.  Obviously, this is not typically the case but the opposite is true.  Jared Taylor tells us (pg. 188):

In a 2009 poll, 69 percent of Mexicans said they thought Mexican-Americans’ primary loyalty should be to Mexico; only 20 percent said it should be to the United States.

In my opinion, this apparent paradox can be resolved by stepping back and looking at the situation from a non-white point of view.  Whites are accustomed to think that one good deed deserves another.  We believe in karma.  But much of the non-white world does not think in these terms.  What the Mestizo migrants see is not a “good deed”, by the white man, but weakness.  He sees this weakness as an opportunity.  The Mestizo is not concerned with reconquering Mexico – because the whites who control Mexico will never give it up.  So, under the guise of “Mexican solidarity”, they march on their weak neighbor to the North.  Here, not only is there no opposition, but they are encouraged to take over.  Here, the people in power actually pay them to have litters and they are encouraged to breed, and vote, their way to power.  As for Mexico’s elite and government, they say, “we shall not give you Mexico.  But, as consolation, you may have the North.  We’ll encourage you and show you how.”  Their warrior ancestors never had it so easy.
But things will not be so rosy for them in the future.  I have a feeling that, if things continue as they are, the current American caste system will eventually collapse and be replaced with the Mexican one.  In that case, whites will have the last laugh.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics | 14 Comments

I told you so!

Posted on June 22, 2011 by jewamongyou

A while back, I posted about my travels in Europe (Europe is Doomed) and wrote that there seem to be more natives having children than we’d been lead to believe.  Some commentators pounced on me and said I must be mistaken.
Now, through Amren, we find this:

Many European governments have been concerned about falling fertility rates, because of the welfare implications of an ageing population and a shrinking workforce. However, ‘Doomsday’ scenarios of fertility spiralling downwards and European populations imploding have not yet materialised. Recent statistics for childbearing even suggest some recovery in Europe’s fertility. RAND Europe therefore decided to update its 2004 study into the causes and consequences of low fertility in Europe. The report analyses the latest data, reviewed recent literature, and examined the situation in Germany, Poland, Spain, Sweden and the UK in depth.

So it was not my imagination after all.  But let us not become complacent;  keep making those babies!
How many of these babies are born to native Europeans?  I don’t believe there is any way to know for sure.  We do know that in the U.K. about a fourth of new births are to immigrant mothers, at least according to the Mail Online:

The Eurostat analysis showed that Britain’s population rose by 412,000 in 2009, up 182,000 because there were more immigrants than emigrants, and up by 231,000 because of rising birth rates.
Much of the new baby boom is a result of immigration, and one in four children born last year was born to mothers who were themselves born abroad.

But there can be no doubt that even the one in four estimate, for immigrant births, is too low.  What about those whose fathers were born abroad?  What about those whose grandparents were born abroad?  What about those whose immigrant mothers lied about where they were born?  Are native Brits aware of the problem?  Judging by the comments, to the above article, we would think so.  Here’s what was posted before comments were shut down:

These statistics only confirm what is known already. With a an ever higher birth rate from immigrant mothers our country will become eventually unrecognisable. I am not against strictly controlled immigration but it has gone TOO far and it must be halted if we are to retain our identity. Immigration was the number one issue in the election and now everyday there is backtracking. Listen to the people before it is too late.
– Mrs. B., Ipswich. Suffolk, 28/7/2010 08:33

Farewell to England and the English race as soon we will all be extinct what a sad country this has become, and we are living like white slaves
– L Giblin, Reigate Surrey, 28/7/2010 08:32
How can tis country cope with any more migrants and immigrants. God knows what will happen if Turkey is admitted into the EU.
– shirleyrose, Yorks, 28/7/2010 08:31
Thats more than 10% of the population of New Zealand!!! What are your Government doing?
– Jeff Royle, Auckland, 28/7/2010 08:27
Please please please will someone do something. We are full up, we can’t carry on like this. I already feel like a foreigner in my own country. I am 55, my country as I knew it is unrecognisable. Go to London or any large city. It’s dreadful.
– Jax, No Longer Great Britain, 28/7/2010 08:18

I hope Vince Cable is reading this!
– Malc, Bolton, UK, 28/7/2010 08:18

On another note, if those European governments are so “concerned” about falling fertility rates, perhaps they should consider reducing taxes so that the natives can afford to have children.  Perhaps they should reconsider their population-replacement policies so that would-be parents do not refrain from having kids because they believe there is no future for them anyway.  High-level government types are only concerned about one thing:  Their own personal profit and power.  If they cared about anything else, they could not have made it to the top.
What the pro-white movement needs is a fund people can donate to.  Any native European couple that has a baby would be eligible to receive a cash reward from this fund.  That way, even pro-whites, who, for whatever reasons, cannot have babies themselves, could contribute to the effort.  Also, non-white sympathizers could pitch in.  What would it take for some whites to get together and do this?

Posted in activism, government/corporate discrimination against whites, immigration/ Hispanics | 3 Comments

Countenance quotes Penelope Trunk

Posted on June 21, 2011 by jewamongyou

Countenance, whose blog does not allow comments, wrote:

Penelope Trunk:  Repulsion is part of diversity
That’s a funny thing to think about something that’s our greatest and most important strength.

But the “diversity” that we oppose is not the diversity that Penelope is talking about.  She is clearly referring to diversity of environment, experience and ethics.  This is the kind of “diversity” that leftists oppose.  Or, more accurately, they relegate this type of diversity to minimal importance when compared to the only diversity they really care about:  Racial diversity.  I think her post is a good one – even though I take issue with her approach to cats.  Then again, I never worked on a farm.  I think Countenance is simply using the title as a nice soundbite against the sort of diversity that is crammed down out collective throats every day.  Fair enough.
Let us not get caught up in the details of Penelope’s post.  It is more important, I think, to focus on the larger message she is conveying:  That there is a diversity that is a potentially positive thing.  Can we usurp the concept of “diversity” from the left?  If enough of us promote “alternative diversity” through bumper-stickers, t-shirts, leaflets and word of mouth, can we make a difference?
I’d like reader feedback on a bumper-sticker I’m about to order.  It says “CELEBRATE DIVERSITY OF IDEAS”.  If a few of y’all think it’s a good soundbite, I’ll order a few of them and send them out, for a nominal fee, to whoever wants one.

Posted in activism | 1 Comment

Facebook group against wiggers

Posted on June 20, 2011 by jewamongyou

Personally, I try to stay away from Facebook; I don’t need to publicize my private life for all to see and I don’t need my various friends and family getting to meet each other.  Sometimes they can  be like oil and water.  But there is definitely interesting stuff on Facebook.  For example, the group against wiggers – I mean “against white kids trying to be gangsta”:

This group is for those people who are tired of suburban white kids trying to act like thugs. We all know they really look like idiots. Being a trashy person does not make you a “thug”, a “gangsta”, or a “nigga”, so pull your head out of your ass and realize this isnt Compton. Around here, there are no “hoods”, so quit acting like something you’re not.

I wish them luck.  Sometimes I wonder how many of those wiggers are smart kids who, for some reason, want to be seen as morons, and how many of them are bona-fide morons.  The same applies to Asian (non-Hmong) kids.  It’s pathetic when they try to emulate the lowest sector of society – the same sector that harasses them and victimizes them.  They say that imitation is the highest form of flattery so why would anybody want to flatter “gangstas” who show their boxers to the whole world, speak a primitive form of pidgin English and cannot even walk erect?  Incidentally, at least 5 members of this group are black.  Not all blacks condone “ghetto culture”.
But I caused my own teenage son a lot of anguish by mocking his form of English – which is how many young whites (non-wiggers) speak to each other.  I even picked up his phone once when it was ringing, and got his friend to think I was him.  By the way, I’ve coined a name for the current adolescent white form of English:  Doodish.  I realize it’s not a new word, but I don’t think it’s been used in this context yet.  In Doodish, every sentence must start with “Dude…” – except for phone conversations, which typically start with “who-ya-with?”  We can’t call this language “Dudish” because people wouldn’t pronounce it right.
In other news, tomorrow is the first day of Summer, but you wouldn’t know it here in Portland.  We’ve hardly seen the sun in months.  There was no Spring to speak of and they keep forecasting a “sunny weekend” only for it to turn out cloudy.  Perhaps this is God’s punishment for all the Northwest leftists, who are constantly shrieking about “global warming”.  God says, “you’re afraid of warming?  No sun for you!”  But it’s not fair because not all of us are leftists here in Portland.  So your prayers would be appreciated.  Even the  albinos are getting rickets.
I have an idea.  We should rig some of the plows, from snowplows, onto the noses of airplanes and push all the clouds further South where they could probably use the rain.  When you see those plow-planes in the sky, remember – you heard it first from jewamongyou!

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

"Liberals" live in the past

Posted on June 19, 2011 by jewamongyou

Commenting on my post “Abortion funding and blacks“, a visitor by the name of Michelle commented:

Wow… I am amazed at the ignorance of these comments. When you start listing the black on white crimes, think back in history the enumerate amount of crimes that whites have committed against blacks. You people are ridiculous. Your grandparents would go hang a black person at night and then get up and go to church the next morning like nothing had happened. They’re probably burning in hell as I type.

It never seems to occur to such people that they have been fed a distorted version of history all their lives.  For example, it never occurs to them that many of the “victims” of lynchings were rapists whom the official justice system had failed to punish.  It’s easy to blame those who lynched but more of a challenge to put oneself in the shoes of the rape victims or their families.  I would be willing to wager that most, if not all, of those who refer to lynchings as “racist crimes” are the same people who, when asked what they would do if anybody ever harmed their daughters, reveal a willingness to administer justice themselves.  If the perpetrator turned out to be black, would they let him go for fear of appearing “racist”?  But let us assume, for our purpose, that every black who was lynched was innocent.  What kind of numbers are we looking at?
According to Wikipedia:

Nearly 3,500 African Americans were lynched in the United States between 1882 and 1968.

Let us be generous and compare the number of black victims, during those 86 years, with the number of white murder victims of black murder for just 26 recent years.  From The Color of Crime:

The Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) include the race of the victim and offender, and make it possible to calculate rates of interracial murder. In 2002, blacks were 16 times more likely to murder W&H than the reverse. SHR statistics from 1976 to 2002 tell us blacks murdered 26,727 W&H during those 26 years, and W&H murdered 10,207 blacks, making the black-on-W&H murder rate 17 times that of the W&H-on-black murder rate.

If we subtract the number of blacks murdered by Hispanics and whites for that period, we find a disparity of 36,934 non-blacks murdered by blacks for those years.  That’s 1,421 per year.  At that rate, it takes less than 2.5 years for blacks to “make up” for the lynchings of those 86 years.  As brutal as some of the lynchings were, the murders perpetrated by blacks are often just as brutal and sometimes even more so.
When slavery was practiced in the United States, it was also practiced  throughout most of Africa and the Middle East.  It was an ancient, and international, institution.  To single out white Americans, while ignoring the multitude of black slave owners (and dealers) in Africa, is a typical anti-white double standard.  One wonders how many of the “African refugees” allowed into the United States and Europe are descended from slave-owners.  One wonders how many of them are descended from both slave-owners and slaves.  I wonder if the commentator above would consider a black American, who has both slave-owning ancestors and slave ancestors, as sharing culpability for slavery or as deserving of reparations.  This is a problem we run into when we look at injustices of the distant past and try to make up for them in the present.
Indeed, if we look at the victims who leftists point to, as they describe “traditionally disadvantaged minorities”, those victims are almost always seen in hoary black and white photographs.  Their descendants could be almost anybody – or they might have no descendants at all.  It would not surprise me if some Stormfronters have black slaves in their distant ancestry.  This would mean that leftists must be sensitive to those Stormfronters and that they must be careful to avoid offending them – so as to avoid being considered a “racist”.
Overall, leftists are past-oriented.  They look to the past for the events that shape their racial ideology.  This is why we hear them speak so frequently of “the legacy of this” or “the legacy of that”.  A “legacy” is something that happened in the past.  They speak of “historically” disadvantaged groups.  “History” refers to the past.  It’s actors are usually dead and gone.
White advocates are present-oriented.  The statistics we cite are reflections of reality as we experience it today, not a hundred years ago.  If we look at photos of white victims – murdered, raped, robbed, discriminated against due to their white race – we notice that the photos are all in color.  White people are the true “people of color”.
In trying to understand racial disparities, we look to science and technology.  We explore genetics, current culture and trends.  We examine the facts as they truly are, not as the MSM depicts it in order to advance their own agenda.  In other words, we avail ourselves of the latest tools to understand racial dynamics.
But the anti-white, leftist, crowd also has a distorted view of the present.  They see statistics, such as black incarceration rates, and view them through the filter of their version of the past.  Thus, it is not even the “present” that they see; instead of seeing higher frequencies of black criminals, they see “the legacy of slavery”.  They are stuck in the past and, like a broken record, they cannot get past it.  If an anti-white leftist considers science or technology at all, in the realm of race, it is only to try to discredit the work of real scientists.  Once they feel the task is done, they wash their hands of science and go back to their “doctrine of legacies”.

Posted in crime and violence, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 20 Comments

The Hmong: Not a "model minority"

Posted on June 18, 2011 by jewamongyou

A few years ago I read “The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down” by Anne Fadiman.  It is an interesting and complicated story that illustrates the challenges of trying to integrate a primitive people into American society.  The story ends in tragedy and I was left wondering who decided those people should be brought here and why.  I still have no good answers.  The Hmong, though Asians, seem to be as crime-prone as NAM’s.
Today, I had a conversation with a young Hmong.  He told me how, when he visits family in California, he must be careful how he dresses so that other Hmong don’t mistake him for a member of a rival gang.  The Hmong seem to live in fear of each other.  He told me disturbing stories – and I asked him why it is that there is so much crime among his people.  He had no idea.  My mind drifted to the Kurds, another stateless people, and the problems they cause in places like Sweden.  A rough hypothesis worked its way to the surface of my consciousness:  A people that has had little, or no, representation in its home country for many generations is likely to have little respect for the government of its home country.  By extension, it would also lack respect for the laws of that country.  Persecution might even work to make a life of crime more attractive.  Over the course of those generations, a criminal mentality might develop.  In their native country, tradition, harsh justice and segregation of various sub-groups would work to suppress this mentality.  But the moment they leave their traditional lands, and settle in a permissive and mixed nation like the U.S. or Sweden, all those criminal elements are free to express themselves.  Like a soda bottle that has been shaken, they erupt at the first opportunity.
My own people would be an exception (for the most part).  Our strong traditions of discipline and adherence to the law (our own religious law) promoted a more reserved and law-abiding culture.
To help emphasize the extent of Hmong criminality, I’ll quote from Don Stacey at Freedom Writer:

BIRCHWOOD, Wis. A Hmong immigrant from the 24,000-strong “Hmong community” of St. Paul, Minnesota crossed the border into Wisconsin on a hunting trip. Armed with a high-velocity semi-automatic assault-style rifle, Chai Vang, 36, wandered onto private property, ignoring the bright orange “no trespassing” signs and took a position in someone else’s hunting platform.
Locals have complained that the Hmong, a tribe from the jungles of Southeast Asia, have no respect for the concept of private property and hunt wherever they see fit. Apparently this is true. When Vang was confronted by two White people — a man and his son — instead of moving on, he shot them both. Before dying, the father managed to radio for help. Six of his hunting companions converged at the scene on two ATV’s and were immediately fired upon. Those who were not hit fled into the woods but were chased down and shot.
Unfortunately, the eight Whites had only one gun between them. It is not known if they fired even one shot in return.
After killing the five Whites and wounding three, the Hmong immigrant reversed his orange vest to the camouflage side to avoid capture, and attempted to flee the area. However, lost in the woods, he required the assistance of two more Whites to find his way out. Luckily for the two Whites, Vang was out of ammunition. For a complete report see the AP link below.
In February of 2003, the FBI released a law enforcement bulletin warning that throughout the United States, the level of Hmong criminal activity was increasing in severity. Extracts from the FBI bulletin:
The Hmong have become involved in a wide range of crimes, such as homicides, gang rapes, prostitution, home invasions, burglaries, auto thefts, and, most recently, the sale and distribution of illicit drugs.
In the St. Paul/Minneapolis area during the summer of 1999. Within about a 6-week period, at least 22 shootings were reported.
Hmong gangs have considerable mobility. It is not uncommon for gang members to drive from California to North Carolina, stopping en route to visit fellow gang members in other states, such as Minnesota or Wisconsin. Many times, these gangs transport guns to another state and commit crimes in transit. Because of this mobility, law enforcement agencies investigating these gangs must maintain a high level of communication to effectively track gang activity.
Hmong gangs also present a violent threat to people who are not members of gangs. The most frequent and violent crimes against nongang members are rape and prostitution.

I sympathize with ethnic groups that lack sovereignty in their homelands.  As good people, we might care about them and perhaps even render whatever (voluntary) aid we can.  But such aid should take the form of helping them in their homelands.  If, and when, they work out their problems and advance to the point where they no longer pose a danger to those around them, at that point we might consider some sort of limited immigration.  Until then, bringing them here is akin to releasing a pack of brutalized pit bulls into a playground full of children.  Whoever does this is responsible for the resulting carnage.  Here too, the government officials, and interest groups, that brought about the Hmong influx bear responsibility for the resulting death and suffering.
If my hypothesis, or any other culture-based hypothesis, is correct, then it would be interesting to see how long the Hmong remain a crime-prone group.  Will their Asian genetics prevail as their dis-functional culture fades away, leaving them as docile as other Asians?  Or perhaps they will remain a nuisance for centuries.  Maybe their genetics differs from other Asians to the point where they should be considered “honorary NAM’s”.
I look forward to comments that will direct us to articles on this topic.  No doubt others, more enlightened and prestigious than I, have already tackled this topic.

Posted in crime and violence, immigration/ Hispanics | 29 Comments

The death of a diversicrat; A reverse obituary

Posted on June 16, 2011 by jewamongyou

Civilized people are supposed to feel bad about the deaths of others.  But, at the risk of sounding insensitive and callous, I’ll reveal my feeling that the deaths of some people leave the world a better place.  Of course, I’d much rather those people change their evil ways than die.  Furthermore, their deaths bring suffering to their family members who, presumably, did no wrong.
According to The Daily News:

Alex Montoya, who devoted his life to providing education to minority students at Clark and Lower Columbia colleges, has been identified as the man who died Saturday night in an accident near Scappoose, according to the Columbia County Sheriff’s Office.

Alex Montoya, in other words, was a professional bigot who “earned” his living by discriminating against whites.  When the Daily News says that he “provided education to minority students”, a naive person might believe that Montoya earned an honest living – perhaps as a plumber or an electrician – and then donated his hard-earned money to minorities to help them get ahead in life.  Of course, Montoya did not “provide” anything.  The Columbian tells us:

… After serving as director of financial aid and a multicultural advisor at Lower Columbia College, Alex came to Clark as director of financial aid…
… serving on the Washington State Financial Aid Council, the Washington Aid Administrators, and the Washington State Latino Caucus.  Alex also served terms as both president and vice president of the Washington State Multicultural Student Services Director’s Council…

In other words, he was a parasite.  I don’t know why they describe what government bureaucrats do as “service”.  They are cogs in the machinery of oppression and, in this case, the machinery is specifically designed to deny opportunities to white people in favor of non-white people.  And just what is the goal of the “Washington State Latino Caucus”?  They are in favor of the unlimited, uncontrolled invasion of the United States by Latin Americans and they support the use of tax dollars to specifically promote their own ethnic groups through “research”.  It is unclear why tax dollars are needed for this purpose.  After all, we already have skilled researchers who work for free and produce high-quality reports.
What I find particularly galling is that the bulk of Montoya’s salary was extorted from whites as “taxes”, either directly or indirectly.  In the end, he was killed by a drunk driver.  According to Article Base:

According to a paper published by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration in 2002, Hispanics are often disproportionately impacted by drunk driving.  The Hispanic community is united in their opinion that drunk driving is a problem and that something should be done in order to curb its negative effects.  A poll among the Hispanic population in the United states revealed that over 90% believe that drunk driving is a very serious problem that must be addressed.
The statistics also show a need for a focus on the Hispanic population.  Many who come to the US may not be well versed in the traffic safety laws.  Other factors may expose the Hispanic community to a disproportionate level of risk from DUI.  Whatever the reason, below are some of the statistics reported by the NHTSA regarding Drunk Driving and Hispanics:
1. Motor Vehicle crashes are the single leading cause of death for Hispanics between the age of 1 and 44.
2. US-born Hispanics are about three times more likely to drive after drinking than are immigrant Hispanics.
3. Between the years of 1990 and 1194, approximately 12.7% of all alcohol related traffic fatalities were Hispanic persons.
4. Hispanic men have a higher rate of having ever been arrested for DUI than do blacks or whites, and on average Hispanics believed the number of drinks needed to affect driving was higher than what blacks and whites believed.

As is customary, the above article sugarcoats the facts and tries to portray Hispanics as “victims” of some sort of mysterious entity called “drunk driving”.  But the facts speak for themselves.  The organizations Montoya worked for, and probably Montoya himself, wanted the United States to be transformed into “North Mexico”.  It was one of the major Mexican vices that struck him down.
I know in advance that some people are going to comment and tell me that I’m a horrible person for attacking somebody who has died.  To them I give permission to attack me after I die.  They will write that I did not know the man so I should not disrespect him.  I did not know Josef Stalin either – but I still take the liberty of condemning him.  If he was kind to animals or respected his wife, then obviously it is not those traits I would condemn; I condemn him for the evil deeds he is known to have perpetrated.  The same applies here.  If Montoya was a great family man, that is good and well – but it does not absolve him of his crimes.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, immigration/ Hispanics | 8 Comments