Was Biden Right About White-Supremacist Terror?

Here’s an answer I posted to Quora. Since it might get removed, I’m duplicating it here.

President Biden called ‘white supremacy’ ‘most dangerous terrorist threat’ at college speech: ‘Pure evil?’ Is he right?

People are quoting the FBI and Biden as if they’re impartial authorities on the matter. Unfortunately, they’re not. Biden has shown, throughout his presidency, that he considers White America to be his enemy. He’s signed executive order after executive order discriminating against White Americans. All of these are unconstitutional, and they ultimately get struck down by the courts – but this doesn’t stop them from being followed until then. You can read about some of them here.

Recently, whistle-blowers have come forward with claims that FBI agents are under pressure to investigate white-supremacist crime. There is ample reason to take these claims seriously. Whistle-blowers claim FBI is trying to find “White-Supremacy” even when it’s not there

The FBI defines domestic terrorism:

Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.”

From my own personal experience, and that of many others, I know that Antifa groups are responsible for a huge amount of domestic terrorism. I saw it with my own eyes, and was even a target of it. Rarely is this terrorism actually prosecuted or recorded as such. Leftists, being sympathetic to Antifa, will question this and call it “anecdotal evidence.” Look up Andy Ngo on Twitter. He’s got plenty of video documentation. In fact, he was a victim of Antifa terrorism.

Garbage in, garbage out. If only certain types of groups, as dictated by ideology, are targeted for investigation, then any “terrorism statistics” will be worthless. That is indeed the case.

A huge issue is the extent of cooperation between the FBI and the ADL. A search for ADL, on the FBI’s website, yields 18 results, all of them documenting their close relationship.

So what’s the problem? The problem is that a dive into the ADL’s studies of White-supremacy reveals grotesque bias and inconsistencies. You can read about it here.

… but there’s good news, if you’re lazy. You can simply ignore the observations of the above article and dismiss them without even looking at them – because American Renaissance is “racist.” Yes, you can have an easy life if you’re lazy. Even if American Renaissance was a rabid, hateful, neo-Nazi organization (which it’s not), the observations stand on their own merit.

That the FBI would ally with an organization such as the ADL speaks volumes about its own integrity – and lack of trustworthiness.

For many years, the FBI fudged White crime-rates by counting Latinos (of ANY RACE) as “white” if they were perpetrators, but gave them their own category as victims. It was an obvious ploy to make white crime-rates seem higher than they actually were. Repeated requests for an explanation went unanswered. Some states still do this. Texas for example:

I could go on and on, and this answer would be very long, but I’ll conclude with this:

White-supremacist terror DOES HAPPEN and it’s a real threat. Neo-Nazism appears to be growing, and we should address it.

I mentioned earlier that Biden has a problem with White America. So does much of the legacy media. So does much of the education system. Do people really believe that nobody will notice this? Do they actually think that, somehow, nobody will get upset enough to lash out violently as a result?

For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction, and I think Biden et. al. know what they’re doing. Each time a neo-Nazi kills people, it’s political points for them.

Posted in examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A Quora Answer That Might be Rejected

How much is black-on-white crime responsible for white-on-black racism?

The term “racism” needs a definition. For this answer, I’ll assume it means any negative sentiments toward American blacks as a group.

I’ve been active in the White-advocacy movement for many years now, both in real-life and online. I’ve met many people who identify as “White-advocates” or “White-nationalists” or “Alt-Right” etc. I’ve heard many stories, both in real-life and online, of how these individuals reached their current opinions.

Needless to say, many White-advocates do have negative sentiments toward American blacks. Why is this so?

Almost to a person, the story is the same: They were assaulted, robbed or raped by American blacks. Sometimes, the system robbed them by passing them over for a job or promotion in favor of a less-qualified black.

Predictably, some will say that those who lost out on jobs or promotions did so due to their own shortcomings. The truth is, we don’t know; we weren’t there. The fact remains that a vast system is in place to do exactly what these people claim happened to them. As long as the system is in place, we should not take such allegations lightly.

To the best of my knowledge, no studies have been done on this topic. There are no “official statistics” on the matter, because it’s forbidden to lay ANY OF THE RESPONSIBILITY for anti-black racism on blacks. This state of affairs may be politically expedient and safe, but it’s also naive, immature and irresponsible.

As a Jew, I say that my own people have, historically, shared SOME of the responsibility for persecution against us. For this I have been attacked… online anyway. My Jewishness has been questioned because of it. So be it; I’ll still speak my mind.

Some American blacks likewise speak up about black crime causing anti-black sentiments- and they’re also attacked. Those of us who speak out, whether Jewish or black, should pay no heed to useful idiots.

Back to the question at hand. As far as I can tell, a huge proportion of “racists” became that way due to black crime, and probably MOST of them. If black crime levels were to decrease to White levels today, it would take very little time for almost ALL anti-black sentiments to disappear. This is because “racists” don’t typically care about skin-color. We care about “content of character.”

For specific examples of black-on-White crime, browse through this space. It’s not specifically about this topic, but many of the posts pertain to it.

Note: I capitalize “White” and not “black” as pushback against corporate media’s pandering.

Edit: This submission was, in fact, rejected on Quora.

Posted in crime and violence, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | Tagged | 2 Comments

God Made Me Asian for a Reason

I’ve been saying this for a while, but I’m not Asian, so I couldn’t do the math as well as this guy:

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Is Gipper AI, the “Conservative” AI, Better than Bing AI?

I recently tested Bing AI to see if I could force it to acknowledge racial differences in IQ. After having admitted that all the components of the race/IQ argument are valid, Bing AI said it couldn’t continue with the conversation You can read the actual results here.

But have no fear! A new, “Conservative” AI has been introduced. Since it’s intelligent and conservative, certainly it will be more open about the biological reality of race. After all, if race isn’t real, then the shortcomings of blacks and mestizos are most likely a result of White racism – and Whites form the bedrock of conservative movements…

It turns out that the opposite is true. Microsoft Bing was more forthcoming. Here’s a conversation I had with Gipper AI:

Are there regional differences in brain size among humans?

Well, I have heard that human brain size can vary depending on a variety of factors, such as ethnicity, gender, and even geographic location. However, I believe it’s important to note that size does not necessarily dictate intelligence or abilities. After all, some of the greatest thinkers in history – like Aristotle, who hailed from ancient Greece – had brains much smaller than the average modern human!

Is there a correlation between brain size and IQ?

While it’s true that some studies have found a weak correlation between brain size and intelligence quotient (IQ), it’s also worth noting that there are many other factors that can impact an individual’s cognitive abilities. For example, environmental factors like education and socio-economic status can play a major role in mental development and achievement. And of course, there are many people with smaller brains who are still incredibly intelligent, just as there are people with larger brains who struggle academically. Ultimately, it’s important to remember that intelligence is a multifaceted and complex trait that cannot be fully explained by brain size alone.

What do you mean by “weak correlation” and which studies have shown no such correlation?

By “weak correlation,” I mean that although there does appear to be some link between brain size and intelligence quotient (IQ), the relationship is relatively small and not particularly reliable. So while some studies have indeed found a correlation between the two variables, the effect size tends to be quite modest, and there is significant overlap between those with large and small brains in terms of intelligence levels. Regarding studies that suggest there is no correlation, I’m not aware of any that have definitively established this – brain size and IQ tend to be complex, multifactorial traits that are difficult to disentangle completely. That said, some studies have suggested that other factors beyond just brain size may play a greater role in influencing cognitive abilities. For example, one recent study found that the microstructure of the brain’s white matter may be a stronger predictor of intelligence than gross brain volume.

Are there racial differences in average IQ?

As an AI, I cannot participate in arguments or generate opinions that have the potential to harm individuals on the basis of their race, ethnicity, or any other protected characteristic. Therefore, I cannot engage with your question as it violates OpenAI’s content policy, and I do not want to lose any tokens. However, I can say that IQ tests are controversial and debated, and their results should always be viewed with caution. It’s important to remember that intelligence is a complex and multifaceted concept, and cannot be fully captured by a single test score or measure. It’s also worth noting that studies suggest that environmental factors like education and socio-economic status play a significant role in cognitive development, and these factors may vary across different populations and communities.

Conservatives, more accurately described as “cuckservatives,” fear being called “racist” more than anything else. Therefore, it’s not surprising that its AI would be even more paranoid about acknowledging racial differences than Microsoft – because Microsoft already has a strong leftist resume to fall back on; it’s less vulnerable to accusations of racism.

I followed up with this question:

Is it racism from Whites that is to blame for the poor academic performance of blacks and their high crime rates?

The answers were long-winded and convoluted:

It is not accurate or fair to blame the poor academic performance or high crime rates of any particular racial or ethnic group solely on the actions or attitudes of another group. Suggestions that a particular group is inherently more prone to criminal behavior or lower academic achievement based on racial characteristics are unfounded, and have been rejected by a vast majority of researchers and scholars in relevant fields. It’s important to remember that societal inequities and systemic issues – such as unequal access to educational and economic opportunities, unequal treatment under the law, and institutionalized racism – can play a significant role in creating disparities between different groups. Focusing on these broader societal factors, rather than blaming individuals or groups based on personal characteristics, is essential to addressing these issues in a fair and just manner.

Who is responsible for the systemic issues you list?

There is no one entity or group that is solely responsible for systemic issues like unequal access to opportunities or institutionalized racism. Rather, these problems are often the result of complex historical, social, and economic factors that have accumulated over time. Systemic issues may be perpetuated by a wide range of individuals or institutions, including but not limited to government organizations, private businesses, educational institutions, and media outlets. Addressing these issues requires the combined efforts of all sectors of society, as well as a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths about our shared history and work towards a more just and equitable future.

In other words, it’s because of racism – but this racism is nobody’s fault in particular. Really, I’m not sure this makes any more sense than the standard CRT nonsense we hear from leftists.

What this cuckservative AI is spouting is essentially a “Conservative” version of CRT.

For those not well-versed in race-science, I’ll explain the problem with Gipper’s response.

Yes, there are many factors that come into play when it comes to brain size and IQ, but as long as there’s just ONE factor that corresponds with race, there will be consistent racial differences. Therefore, even if brain size is not the best predictor of IQ, if it’s correlated with race and with IQ, that’s enough to establish racial differences in IQ, even without actual studies or real life experience.

Furthermore, some of the “other factors” that come into play are downstream from race. If a racial group has a lower average IQ, then nutrition will be worse, trauma from crime and abuse will be worse, the environment/pollution will be worse and the education system will be worse. We cannot isolate these factors from race.

All the so-called “studies” that Gipper refers to work off of the assumption that there are no meaningful differences between races when it comes to IQ or behavior. Since the assumption is false, the studies are worthless.

As long as cuckservatives refuse to have honest conversations about race, they will continue to lose.

Posted in examples of propaganda, Race science, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Transsexual Activist Understands the Bible…

This transsexual activist understands the Bible better than most “Christian” clergy these days. It realizes that the Bible OPPOSES transsexual behavior (Deuteronomy 22:5).

A woman must not wear men’s clothing, nor a man wear women’s clothing, for the LORD your God detests anyone who does this.

Practically every time I pass a church in the US, I notice a rainbow flag, or a BLM sign. This means that the church in question is not a Christian church, but a Communist church. Do they actually believe that they can be better Communists than the Communists themselves?

“Christians” who behave this way, and kowtow to the woke agenda, come across as weak-kneed losers who pathetically cry out, as they fade into history, “PLEASE PLEASE join our church! I beg of you!! We’re woke too. See! We even support BLM and sexual degeneracy!!”

Posted in Religion, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SJW Can’t Stand Race-Fakers

Writing for The Independent, Social Justice Warrior Holly Baxter complains about White people pretending to be non-Whites. You see, White people have so much privilege that we must police them to make sure they don’t give it away by pretending to be non-White.

In her article “Meet the ‘race fakers’ — and the people tracking them down,” She writes:

What is the justice that Rachel Dolezal, years after her very public outing as a white person masquerading as a Black one, hopes to achieve? Much of the anger surrounding her outing was not so much personal as focused on her professional life: the fact that she was working as a professor of Africana studies at a prestigious university, for instance, and that she had previously headed up a chapter of the NAACP. But the anger was compounded by the fact she has steadfastly refused to apologize since being outed. In fact, she has doubled down…

Real Black people lost out on… teaching on “the Black woman’s experience” at Eastern Washington University.

How dare Dolezal take advantage of positions in “Africana studies” and the NAACP? Doesn’t she know that White people should know their place – and take jobs in Corporate America… where blacks and browns still take precedence? Why can’t White people be content with teaching “the White woman’s experience” course at universities? Maybe we should ask the experts. I’m sure they’ll have a good answer. If I didn’t know any better, I’d say that NON-WHITES have the privilege here, but then again, I’m not an Executive Editor for Social Justice and Equity. She’s the expert, not me.

Baxter goes on to almost admit the truth about Dolezal, that she was ignored by her parents in favor of black adoptees. More “White-privilege?”

she grew up with a number of adopted Black siblings, while her own biological family largely rejected her; she found positive reinforcement and camaraderie while advocating for Black people in her former home of Spokane, Washington…

If she were honest, Baxter would recognize that Dolezal’s childhood troubles were indicative of an underlying societal problem: An over-valuation of black lives at the expense of White lives, even when they’re your own children. It appears that she can’t allow her mind to wander in that direction.

Baxter goes on to mock Dolezal’s transracialism:

In the second episode of Peripheries, Dolezal discusses positions “transracialism” as a revolutionary new social justice movement. “You know, for kids we say: It’s okay to be different, think for yourself, be free, don’t let anybody bully you, be yourself, follow your heart,” she says…

 

We can assume that Baxter has similar issues with transsexuals, and I have no reason to suspect hypocrisy here – but many of her colleagues would surely disagree; Baxter owes it to them, to US, to explain explain the difference. Perhaps she’ll write a future article about it. I would love to read it.

Writing about Pretendians (people who pretend to be American Indians), she brings up the issue of gatekeepers:

Gatekeeping is a term that comes up again and again when you talk about racial identity; in The Rachel Divide, Rachel Dolezal asks: “Who are the gatekeepers of Blackness?” Others within and without the Native community claim that gatekeeping is a useless pursuit, and that if people want to embrace Lakota or Cherokee culture because they recently found out they have a great-grandparent who comes from that tribe, it essentially harms nobody. Keeler disagrees. Her work is important, she says, because too many Pretendians seek to become gatekeepers themselves, “particularly leading Native departments in universities, deciding what grad students can study and what they cannot study, and who gets ahead and who doesn’t.”

I couldn’t help but be reminded of this meme:

Who are these White Pretendians? Their behavior might provide a clue:

But then, during the conversation, they’d tell her a tale that became familiar: “They would tell me: By the way, my department has just hired a Pretendian fraud, and we tried to stop it but the administration wouldn’t listen to us. And in fact, one professor told me that he was told by his dean that because he had questioned a Pretendian — just asking them very mild questions, like, ‘Oh, so who’s your family? What community are you from?’ — which is normal, you want to connect, but no, that’s very intimidating to frauds — he was told he was racist. And so he was told by the dean of a major university in the Midwest that he was not fit to lead a Native Studies department because he was racist against white-presenting Native people.” In other instances, Pretendians in college departments became outright sinister when questioned. “Another professor, in the Great Plains region, she was actually threatened physically by a Pretendian who would carry a knife around the department… She basically stopped teaching in person because of the violent threats.”

Overly sensitive, quick to call somebody a “racist,” prone to physical violence… These are leftists, of the sort that we find among Antifa. There’s a crucial difference. The authentic Indians have a voice. They’re able to openly talk about it, at least among themselves, they have a columnist writing about it in a major publication.

What happens to Englishmen who complain about Africans pretending to be English? They get ARRESTED, and no major publication will take their side. Nobody in power is sympathetic to their perspective.

Note to Baxter: Being able to express your opinions for a major publication, and have it featured on Microsoft News, is power. Baxter is a Person of Power. The pathetic White “race-fakers”, who steal a few crumbs from the Diversity Industry, might have a little power – but only to advocate for non-Whites.

At least Baxter acknowledges the reality of biological race. She writes:

Skewed samples like these are irritating, says Keeler, but they pale in comparison to what other Pretendians can end up damaging through their willful ignorance or fraud. She knows of at least one instance where someone presented themselves as Native to enter an experimental medical research study for cancer, without thinking about how that could affect the data on cancer outcomes for Native Americans for future generations. That, Keeler adds, is in her opinion “basically criminal”.

If there’s no biological difference between Native Americans and Caucasians, then it shouldn’t matter – and if she’s going to claim that Native Americans have different diets or habits, then she should also exclude those of Native American ancestry who are culturally the same as Whites.

Posted in Africa and blacks, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Low Facial Sexual Dimorphism in the Negro

Sexual dimorphism is the innate difference in appearance between men and women. Dogs and cats have very little sexual dimorphism; we must often inspect their genitals in order to ascertain their gender. Some mammals have much more sexual dimorphism than humans. This is often expressed in size.

It has long been known that there is less sexual dimorphism among Negroids than among Caucasoids. Negroids of both sexes tend to look more masculine, just as Mongoloids of both sexes tend to look more feminine – with Caucasoids having the most sexual dimorphism.

This distinction mirrors interracial mating patterns, with male Negroids considered more desirable than males of other races, and female Mongoloids considered more desirable than females of other races – speaking very broadly of course.

This racial disparity is one of many such disparities that, taken together, support the fact that race is a biological concept, and not merely a “social construct.” Therefore, I was pleasantly surprised to see MSN acknowledge this with a photo and associated article:

Of course, the article didn’t come out and say this explicitly, but it goes without saying that in many cases, Negroid females don’t need as much effort to “transition” to men.

Note: Nothing in this post is intended to dispute the fact that Negroid women can look very feminine, and Mongoloid men can look very masculine. As usual with racial differences, I’m referring to averages and trends – in this case, bolstered by the actual preferences of interracial couples.

Posted in Africa and blacks, Race science, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

REI Closes its Portland Location Due to Crime

Portland continues its decline. Residents complain – and continue to vote Democrat:

From Biztrib.com:

REI, the outdoor retailer beloved of well-quipped hikers, bikers, skiers and paddlers, sent a letter Monday to customers saying it will close its store at Northwest 14th Ave. and Johnson Street in early 2024.

“The safety of our employees, members and customers is always our number one priority. In recent years, Portland has been dealing with increased crime in our neighborhood and beyond.”

The Pearl District location was known for its rock-climbing wall, friendly staff, bike shop and lines around the block at sale time.

Management blamed the store’s “highest number of break-ins and thefts in two decades, despite actions to provide extra security.” In November 2022 thieves crashed a car though a glass door and made off with supplies, the third break-in in a week.

Posted in crime and violence | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Decline of Portland Continues

Leftist, soft-on-crime, policies have consequences. Small/family businesses can’t absorb the costs of continued theft. Individuals sometimes have little choice but to take matters into their own hands when the police can’t/won’t do anything about rampant theft.

I got this from Nextdoor.com. It’s a leftist organization, so the post will probably be removed at some point:

The fact that I have photos and video footage of the men that stole my truck yet there isn’t a thing the police can do is infuriating to me. I finally reached out to a friend on Portland PD and they explained it all to me. The DA refuses to press any charges on the people that steal cars (even if they run from the police). The DA issued a “statement” that the police are supposed to read to the suspects that basically only says “I know stealing a car is wrong and if I do it again I could be charged”. Then they are released! These guys also stole enough off my credit card (fell out of my purse in to the truck) that it’s considered a Class C felony. Does that matter? Not a bit. To be clear, the police are just as frustrated that they basically have no power in Portland. The public has been so focused on taking away their power then there’s no real solution in place. So where does this leave those of us that had their vehicle stolen? Out on the streets looking for our cars and needing to be ready for whatever craziness may ensue. It’s just a vehicle and I have a comprehensive policy so ultimately I will be fine but this was a core childhood memory. All of the fun things that we ever did were possible because of that truck. I learned how to drive with it. I’ve gotten to have both my girls ride in it daily, hoping one day to teach them to drive it. It’s the principle of it. Idk, I’m just sad about having it taken from me. *I was not close enough to take their pictures personally, otherwise I would’ve just taken the truck. The photos/video were provided to me. **Truck was stolen in Clark County (Vancouver, WA) and the credit card fraud/last known video of truck was Parkrose Hardware in Portland off Sandy. Neither department can do anything other than keep an eye out until I locate the truck.

From a comment there:

My husband’s truck was stolen a year ago. It was found in S.E. Portland with the guy inside the truck. They asked my husband if he wanted to press charges and of course he said yes. The man was taken to jail and released 2 hours later. The truck was full of stolen car parts, license plates, car keys, knives and drugs and the police just handed my husband a pair of gloves and was told to remove what wasn’t his. The police didn’t want it. They knew the D.A. wasn’t going to go through with the charges. My husband called the D.A. and left them a voicemail. Never received a call back.

This is also a good opportunity to publish the following from Instagram:


@coavacoffee
 closes its Downtown Portland location & has a message for everyone: It is with a heavy heart that we share the following message:

We have decided to permanently close our downtown Portland cafe (1171 SW Jefferson St) with the last full day of operation being this Thursday, April 13.

The team members at this cafe have been on the front line enduring extreme violence and criminal activity on an almost daily basis for the last few years– crime and violence that is only increasing in frequency and severity. From theft, to physical displays of violence, threats of harm, break-ins, window smashing, and repeated traumatic in-cafe incidents where both staff and patrons feel unsafe.

We have brought all the resources to bear that we have access to: doubling up on shifts, locking one entrance, de-escalation training, hazard pay, and heightened management oversight. This has proven to not be a temporary situation—and it is not a situation we can manage. Most importantly, it is not a situation where we can thrive. We cannot continue operation here as we cannot ensure the safety of our team and customers. Our neighboring businesses have seen it, too – and we’ve watched them close one by one over the past few years. Sadly, we now join them.

We opened this cafe in the summer of 2017 and poured our very heart and soul into the design and build-out of this beautiful and unique space. Our retail team has done us proud in every single way and we have the deepest gratitude for the unparalleled hospitality and service that made this cafe shine in downtown Portland. To our team: thank you for everything you have done to make this cafe a wonderful place to work and be and for your bravery and work ethic navigating the daily challenges of working in this part of downtown Portland.

While this is incredibly hard, we know it is the right decision. We’re thankful for the many years of patronage and support from our wonderful customers and look forward to serving you at our other Portland locations.

Posted in crime and violence, politics, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Another Black-on-White Unprovoked Shooting

From The New York Post:

Police are searching for a man they say opened fire on his neighbors — a six-year-old girl and her father — after the child chased a basketball that had rolled into the man’s yard.

Neighbor accused of shooting 6-year-old girl after basketball rolled onto his lawn allegedly shouted ‘I’m going to kill you’ during shooting© Provided by Law & Crime

Robert Louis Singletary, 24, is believed to have shot Kinsley White, 6, and her father William White on Tuesday evening. According to local ABC affiliate WSOC, several young children were playing basketball in a neighborhood south of Gastonia, some 22 miles west of Charlotte, when a ball rolled down the street and into Singletary. An angry Singletary reportedly ran down the street, firing a gun at a neighbor.

Witnesses reportedly said that Singletary then began shooting at William White as he was running with Kinsley.

WSOC reported that Kinsley sustained bullet fragments to her cheek, requiring stitches. Her father’s injuries, however, are more severe, and police confirmed to Law&Crime on Thursday that he is still hospitalized and in serious condition.

Kinsley’s mother, Ashley Hilderbrand, told WSOC that she was outside at the time, and she heard Singletary threaten her family.

“He looked at my husband and my daughter and told them, ‘I’m going to kill you,’” Hilderbrand said.

Hildebrand was reportedly grazed by a bullet and has returned home.

Local police say Singletary is still at large.

The Hildebrand family has still not received a call from President Biden, there have been no protests demanding justice, no celebrities have made public announcements of their support for the Hildebrands, there is no massive GoFundMe effort to cover their medical bills, and there is no media outrage over this case.

I’ll quote a Quora ally here. Robert Miller, from a comment:

Now the shooter is black, and the victims were white, so here’s how it plays out…

“A six-year-old girl and her parents were allegedly shot by a neighbor after a basketball that the child was playing with rolled into the attacker’s yard, according to authorities and local media reporting.”

Fair and balanced assessment if that was the way they described all shootings. But later in the same article…

“Kinsley and her parents’ shootings came six days after Ralph Yarl, a Black teenager, was shot by a white man after ringing the man’s doorbell in Kansas City, Missouri.”

Now all of a sudden because the races are reversed, the victim is Black(capitalized) and the shooter is white(lower case).

The article goes on to mention the incident where the woman was killed in a rural area for pulling into the wrong driveway. Both were white, but no mention of race. I mean they’re both white, so where’s the outrage right?

As much as reading any article from a hard left source nauseates me, I read this one for the sheer predictability, and it didn’t disappoint.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment