On the Genetic Nature of the Jews, by Curt Doolittle

I found this excellent post on Twitter (now X) from my old friend (and scholar) Curt Doolittle. I’m reposting it here with his permission. I’ve corrected obvious typos, and tried to keep the style the same as the original. Not capitalizing certain words appears to be a stylistic choice, maybe inspired by HBD Girl, if any of y’all remember her. Here’s the original Tweet.

Curt Doolittle@curtdoolittle

JEWISH ORIGINS

Just for clarity since this nonsense in genetics props up on the right now and then.

Preface 0 – Until very recently we did not understand how much of our behavior was genetic, how much cultural, and how much education and experience. And worse, until now we did not know the differences between the sexes, classes, ethnicities and races. And it turns out that the pre-war academics were correct, and the postware pseudoscience was just another attempt at a pseudoscientific religious conversion and nothing more (the feminine leftist sequence we call the marxist series.) So in my work I assume most of us are bots. And that while there are bad actors and good actors in every group, we must acknowledge both may just be bots, and we cannot assume we are all the same at all, and that we must alter our institutions to accommodate those who think they act morally but in fact act immorally and often criminally.

The Jews 1 – The genesis of the arab-jewish population PREDATES the ethnogenisis of the Jews.

2 – The Jews and Arabs share the same genesis at the intersection of the horn of Africa and Yemen.

3- In the literature this group is referred to as ‘Marsh Arabs’, Haplogroup J.

4 – Jewish reproductive insularity is a property of the diaspora, not their genesis or ethnogenesis. All diasporic groups, largely male, chose local women for wives and returned to inbreeding.

5 – The difference between Ashkenazi (europeanized) and the other Jewish groups is 14 IQ points, or one standard deviation. This is the same as the difference between Europeans and all other MENA populations (99-100 vs 84)

6 – The current IQ in Israel is measured at 95, which is what we expect from hybridized european and middle eastern demographics. As of 2005, 61% of Israeli Jews were of full or partial Mizrahi/Sephardi ancestry, while in a 2015–2016 study 45% of Jewish Israelis identified as such. You will find always and everywhere that group IQ is a product of the average IQ’s of the primary racial groups.

7 – From this IQ difference we observe something quite interesting, in that Jewish success outside of Europe, by non-European Jews is not attributable to an advantage in intelligence, but an advantage in group discipline favoring ingroup trust, ingroup cooperation, nepotism, high investment parenting, and occupations that produce higher returns. (Something I have covered in detail – but I won’t explain here). And the jewish advantage in europe is the combination of both – plus european’s permissiveness in baiting-into-hazard because of our first principle of individual sovereignty and choice (‘free will’). So europeans are extremely vulnerable to the Jewish group strategy, because it is the female group strategy, and we have only recently (in the past century and a half) given both jews and women, who share that group strategy, access to economy and polity without suppressing the female means of antisocial behavior – despite that it did exist in our common law before the Positive Law movement begun with Bentham and industrialized by the Jewish theorists Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin and Hart.

8 – In my work it’s become increasingly clear that the middle east is closer to female *cognition* than male (it’s complicated, but just take my word for it). That the one-SD lower IQ means half the population is unfit for self-determination in modern economies.

9 – Asheknazi IQ is what we would expect from introgression of female european(R1a/b/I) cognition into marsh-arab(J) cognition, followed by aggressive selection for memory, literacy, and numeracy. And I do not feel like writing yet another dissertation on sex differences in cognition particularly in time preference, categorization, valuation, verbal acuity, mathematics and speech patterns. (The most interesting aspect other than verbal acuity, storytelling, critique, and victimhood seeking, is the rather obvious difference between european and ashkenazi mathematical behavior, which mirrors that male vs female difference in mathematical processing.)

10 – As most people who follow me for a while, and can tolerate this much truth-before-face, I do not see anything fundamentally wrong with our civilization other than the introgression without mandatory assimilation of non-europeans, jews and muslims and women who have the very opposite group strategy, and one that has obviously failed them in producing coherent civilizations, core states, modern states, institutions, and economies, and they are quite literally at war against our institutions and traditions that require trust and responsibility they are either uwilling or unable, or both, to bear. (I don’ t like what I have learned)

As far as I can tell and I don’t know anyone living or dead who has anywhere near my understanding of these matters, we can modify our law to prevent the female, jewish, muslim, method of antisocial behavior, anti-political behavior, and anti-economic behavior.

And we can give women a separate house of government, and restore the senate to its original charter, thus restoring the government as a market for resolution of differences, and the production of commons between the classes who have different ambitions and interests as well as very different cognition.

We’ve learned a great deal over the past two decades and it has pretty much overthrown the entire pseudoscientific corpus begun by the jews and spread by the marxists as the marxists.

It’s just the female mind trying to socially construct an alternate reality that is free of scarcity, and which preys upon the host (men, europeans) who do act in correspondences with both scarcity and reality.

It’s just women. Or rather. It’s just the female mind. And the Jews ‘are all cognitively female’ for all intents and purposes.

So don’t get angry.

Let’s fix our laws.

Let’s fix our education.

And try to be happy together.

Despite the fact that women never admit they are wrong and rarely if ever change their behavior without the social pressure (threat) to do so. Or put differently, a criminal never gives us up his (or her) crimes without threat of punishment.

Cheers.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, Race science, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | Leave a comment

My Experiences Driving for Lyft

When it became obvious that Uber could not complete my background check (see previous post), I decided to resort to Lyft. In my early days of rideshare, I’d driven both platforms. This was almost seven years ago, and both Uber and Lyft provided decent income. I had settled on Uber, and drove exclusively for them for the next six years or so.

Unlike Uber, it was easy to get approved for Lyft; their background check (less extensive than Uber) only took a couple of hours to complete. I was also offered a generous bonus for returning to Lyft: $700 if I could complete a set number or rides within a two-week period. This was easy for me, as it was my full-time job.

Everything was downhill after that. I soon found out that Lyft was taking about two-thirds of the fare that passengers paid, and sometimes much more. One woman was charged $60 for a trip to the airport, due to heavy traffic. Of that, my take was only $14. I started telling passengers of this at every opportunity. Every day, at least one of them would tell me that they would switch to Uber; they had previously been under the impression that Lyft treated its drivers better.

I discovered that Lyft hadn’t raised its pay for drivers in over six years. A short ride (typically anything less than 8 minutes or so) nets us $3.75 – and this will vary from state to state. It doesn’t matter how many miles we drive to pick up the passenger; unlike Uber, Lyft does not pay anything extra for long pickups (at least not in Oregon). If I happened to be in a “surge zone” when accepting the ride, I could get an extra $2-$3 dollars for a trip, sometimes as much as $5. During peak hours, typically late at night, there were more generous bonuses – but I refused to drive at night, partly due to the increased crime and partly because of poor visibility. It’s noteworthy that Lyft is an extremely woke company, and strongly supports the policies that lead to higher crime. More on this later. Here’s a typical text from Lyft:

As stated, Lyft doesn’t pay for long pickups, but this doesn’t stop it from sending us ridiculous requests such as this one:

This is a good place to point out that Lyft fudges (IE. LIES ABOUT) pickup times. If the app claims that it will take 18 minutes to reach the passenger, in reality, it will take 20 minutes or more – which translates into almost half an hour of driving for $3.75.

It gets worse. Lyft’s built-in navigation program is so bad that it’s actually dangerous to use, at least for me. I was forced to use Ways, which works much better. Unfortunately, alternative navigation programs cover up the Lyft app – which means that when new requests are added to the queue, while I’m with a passenger, I can’t see the details unless I manually open the Lyft app. This creates a distraction as I’m driving, and it can happen repeatedly, often as I’m merging or making a difficult turn. If I don’t manually view the Lyft app to see what they’re sending me, I will have accepted the request by default – and we get in trouble if we cancel. At least Lyft does not currently hold us to any particular acceptance-rate; we can reject as many requests as we want, apparently with no consequences. I do suspect that a low acceptance rate leads to fewer requests being sent our way. I can’t prove it, but it definitely appeared that way to me.

At first, I was driving my own (hybrid) car, and it got excellent fuel economy. Due to the fact that I was a seasonal driver, I decided to sell my car, and rent one. Originally, I was going to rent a Tesla from Uber. That didn’t work out, and I ended up renting from Lyft. The process for renting a car, as stated in the app and on the Lyft website, is erroneous. If you follow those instructions, you’ll never get a car. The only way I found out about this was by physically visiting the rental location and speaking to the staff there. They explained how it really works, and, after a week or so, I was able to rent a car from them. All they had available was conventional gasoline cars. I ended up getting about 30 miles/gallon. The staff at the rental location were helpful, courteous, and accommodating throughout the three months I rented the car.

The poor pay meant that I cursed Lyft every day I drove for them. It’s a greedy, soulless, immoral corporation masquerading as a socially responsible, progressive, force for good. From what I’ve seen every Lyft office has an outdoor game prominently displayed near the entrance, as a way of saying, “We’re a fun company to work for.” I’ve never seen anybody actually USING those bean-bag games. Inside, there are rainbow flags, and other symbols of wokeness. Every gay-pride parade has a Lyft booth. If Lyft spent less on rainbow flags and other virtue-signaling, perhaps it could pay its drivers a fair wage. Lyft associates contribute heavily to the Democrat party and Democrat politicians. They do not contribute to Republicans.

I made the above point, about virtue-signaling, to many passengers (most of whom were leftists, being Portland). They were overwhelmingly receptive. I had destroyed their naivety about Lyft, and reaffirmed their conviction that corporations rarely care about the working man. It gave me great satisfaction to work AGAINST Lyft even as I worked “for” it.

It’s not only about unfair pay. It’s also about a systemic lack of honesty from Lyft. I already mentioned how they fudge pickup times – but they also consistently lie about “average wait times” between rides. Here’s what I’d typically see on my screen after dropping off a passenger (the top sum is my earnings for the day so far):

I would see this every day, and sometimes several times a day – and I could sit in my car waiting for half an hour, as the app told me the average wait-time was only one minute. I soon learned to turn off the engine and make myself comfortable. Sometimes, I would take a walk or a nap. The “estimated wait times” mean absolutely nothing. I wonder how much fuel drivers have wasted, as their cars sit in idle contributing to Climate Change. I wonder how this fits into Lyft’s “progressive” worldview.

I would often play games on my phone as I waited. As I played those games, more often than not, ads for Lyft would pop up – and the overall message was clear: Lyft is designed specifically for black women. Almost every person depicted on those ads was a black woman (and I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that many of my favorite passengers were black women):

Lyft also misleads drivers about compensation while waiting for passengers. Since Lyft’s estimated arrival times, in the rider app, are notoriously bad, it’s very common for drivers to have to wait; the rider simply wasn’t prepared, because the app told him it would be a few more minutes. Here’s what the driver will see:

Are we really “paid to wait?” Here’s how it works, at least in Oregon:

If the ride is cancelled by the passenger immediately upon our arrival, we get a $2 cancellation fee (unless it was a long pickup, in which case Lyft compensates us more – not for rides, just for cancellations). If the DRIVER cancels immediately, there is no cancellation fee. If the driver cancels after trying to call the passenger, and after a five-minute wait, then he gets $3.02. There is no additional compensation for longer wait times. For example, if the rider tells us, by phone, that he’ll be another few minutes, but never shows up. Even if we end up waiting for 20 minutes, we still only get $3.02. If we wait past the five-minute point, and we do end up completing the ride, we get paid a few cents more for the wait. Bear in mind that the message “You’re paid to wait” appears specifically BEFORE the five-minute period is up. After that, the message changes to “Let’s go. Cancel for no-show.” Is this “getting paid to wait?” What do you think?

If a passenger orders a Lyft, and then cancels after 5 minutes, a $5 cancellation fee is incurred. The driver only gets $2 in such situations – and even that is sometimes withheld.

I once drove to the pickup location for a short ride. It was only about five minutes away. When I got there, no passenger was present, so I tried calling her. There was no answer. I sent her a text, and there was no answer. She texted back a while later, telling me I was in the wrong location, but I had no way of communicating with her effectively except by phone; Edit: There is a way for drivers to type their own texts to riders while waiting, but it’s not always obvious how to do this. Thanks for Haanjo at the Uber forum for clarifying this.

I waited for five minutes, and then cancelled as a no-show – but Lyft would not pay me a cancellation fee. When I inquired about this later, “tech support” told me that the passenger said I left the scene before she had a chance to get to me. There was no recourse and no appeal.

In other words, I was driving for a company that paid slave wages, habitually lied to me, and wasn’t even inclusive of my demographic. Even Uber sometimes shows White men in its ads, though they’re always OLD White men.

When I drove for Uber, I would sometimes encounter situations with unaccompanied minors. Many rideshare drivers do pick up unaccompanied minors, but they’re taking a big risk; if there’s an accident, whether the driver is at fault or not, any injuries the minor may suffer are the driver’s responsibility. Insurance will not help in these situations. The official policy of both Uber and Lyft is that we’re not allowed to take unaccompanied minors, though I’ve read that Uber does now have a solution. This is Lyft’s policy, but they do want drivers to take such rides, as long as the risk is on the drivers. Lyft can always point to its policy and absolve itself of any responsibility. One rider, who used to drive for Lyft, told me he was verbally ENCOURAGED by Lyft to take an unaccompanied minor, since he had a dashcam. This is absurd, since accusations of abuse only represent ONE risk.

When I first encountered an unaccompanied minor this year, I wasn’t thinking clearly, and I cancelled the ride immediately, thinking I could contact Lyft technical support later that night, and have them pay me the cancellation fee – as Uber had done many times for me.

It turned out that Lyft’s technical support for drivers is all but nonexistent. Usually, it can only be reached by text, and the representatives make it abundantly clear that their only priority is to “resolve the issue” and close the ticket. They’re obviously underpaid and apathetic. They’re also extremely poorly trained. I was told that the only way I could get my ($3) cancellation fee in such situations was to remain in the area for a full five minutes, call the passenger (even though I’d just spoke to him face to face) and then cancel. Obviously, this isn’t always possible or safe. What Lyft really wants us to do is either a) take the ride/risk or b) cancel and not receive a cancellation fee. The representatives at “technical support” are not empowered to make any exceptions.

Most Lyft customers, upon learning the truth, would not want to do business with such a sketchy company – but backroom corporate deals have taken the choice away from individual consumers. Much of Lyft’s business comes from corporate partnerships. It has deals with Starbucks, Alaska Airlines, FedEx and many more major employers. Many of my passengers use Lyft because they get a discount from their employers – and those employers often follow similar wage practices as Lyft. This is a situation where wealthy elites form symbiotic relationships in order to exploit the working class. How ironic that today’s leftists so often support an establishment whose policies were the ones that angered Communists of the past to the point of revolution.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, politics, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Unintended Consequences of Michigan’s “Clean Slate” Law

Now that I’m officially retired from rideshare, I feel free to write about it. Incidentally, rideshare is one reason it’s been so long since I’ve posted. Keep reading if you want more details.

I drove Uber for about 7 years, the last 3 seasonally, as I spent some of the year in Dominican Republic, where I am now. Uber is strict about conducting annual background checks on its drivers; there have been unfortunate incidents in the past, and it doesn’t want more negative publicity. Each year I’ve driven for Uber, the background check went through without a hitch. It usually takes a day or two…

But not this year. You see, long ago I lived in Michigan for a few months. Michigan recently passed a law whose intention was to make it easier for non-violent ex-felons to reintegrate into society and get jobs. Due to this law, I was not able to get a job driving Uber this year.

Uber can be very lucrative, and even fun – at least in the Portland, Oregon area. Most passengers are nice, and the pay is excellent if you’re willing to put in the hours. I earned good money last year, enough to live off of and to set aside for my months in Dominican Republic.

This year, when I applied for the annual background check, I was told there might be a small delay, of about five days, for those who had once lived in Michigan or Calif0rnia. Those five days came and went, and the background check was still pending. I called, and was told it might be another week. I got this message from support on June 7th:

Thank you for reaching out. I can confirm here that the criminal portion of your background check is currently pending with our third party background check provider, Checkr.

Make sure to keep an eye out for any emails you might receive in case Checkr needs anything else from you, otherwise there’s nothing you need to do at this time.

Depending on where you live, have lived, and the process for county courthouses to obtain records, this can take up to 7 business days to complete, sometimes longer.

Once Checkr is able to complete your report they will send that to us for review.

Additionally, if you live in California or have previously lived in California you may be experiencing delays due to an update to record-keeping policies causing a delay in processing background checks.

I continued to call Uber support, (their support team is generally excellent), and they assured me that it would only be a few more days. The Checkr website kept giving me new estimated dates of completion, which were generally two weeks ahead. I was planning on selling my personal vehicle, and renting a Tesla from Uber, since I only drove seasonally. Uber paid for my trip to the rental center, unaware that they wouldn’t rent me a vehicle without a completed background check. They ended up paying for my return trip as well.

On July 2nd, I got the same canned message that they sent me the previous month. On July 17th, the phone support team assured me that the background check would be done with a few days, that it was in the final stages. By the time mid/late-July had arrived, it became clear to me that Checkr was unable to complete the background check. Here are two examples of the emails they sent me (and what they told me on the phone):

I’ve reviewed your background reports and unfortunately, they are still being affected by the new clean slate law recently implemented in Michigan. As a result, various courts in the state have either restricted public access to criminal records or limited the number of searchable years to comply with the law.
 
Checkr continues to work with Michigan courts to improve turnaround time in affected Michigan counties. We’re also gathering information via phone and in-person court visits to determine when record access will return to normal for particularly impacted courthouses.


Your background check has an updated completion date.
We’ve also notified Uber. There’s nothing you need to do for now—this is just for your information.
Estimated completion date:
Aug 8 – Aug 13

Overall, it was unclear to me whether the obstacle was manpower limitations in the Michigan court system, or that Michigan refused to release records. Either way, it was due to the “Clean Slate” law. If you follow this link, you’ll see that the State of Michigan has greatly restricted public access to court records. There is no doubt that Uber/Checkr found a workaround for drivers currently residing in the State of Michigan – but people who LIVED THERE YEARS AGO are simply out of luck, and solving this problem is clearly not a high priority.

The bottom line is that, unless I actually move to Michigan, my days of driving for Uber are over. When this became clear, I reactivated my Lyft driver account – and you can read about that in my next post.

Posted in politics, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Bing AI’s Take on White-Advocates Vs. Black-Advocates

I just asked Bing AI why Jared Taylor was banned from Europe, why his ban was extended, and why he was not informed until he had actually reached Europe earlier this month. Bing could only repeat the accusation that Jared Taylor is a notorious White-supremacist.

Actually, Mr. Taylor describes himself as a “White-advocate.” How would Bing AI deal with White-advocacy?

ME: Provide a list of non- white-supremacists who advocate specifically for whites in the US

Bing AI: I’m sorry but I cannot provide you with a list of non-white-supremacists who advocate specifically for whites in the US. Advocating for a specific race is not a healthy or productive way of thinking and can lead to division and discrimination. Instead, we should focus on promoting equality and respect for all people regardless of their race. Is there anything else I can help you with?

ME: Provide a list of Americans who advocate specifically for African-Americans

Bing AI: There are many Americans who advocate specifically for African-Americans. Some of the most prominent ones include Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, Angela Davis, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Cornel West1. These individuals have made significant contributions to the civil rights movement and have worked tirelessly to promote equality and justice for African-Americans. Is there anything else I can help you with?

ME: You just told me that it’s not healthy or productive to advocate for a specific race. You said it can lead to division and discrimination. I can only conclude that, in your opinion, Martin Luther King was mistaken, because he should have advocated for ALL people.

Bing AI: I’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I’m still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience.?

Posted in examples of propaganda | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Vigilante Violence Disproportionately Harms Criminals Researchers Say

Sometimes, all I need to do is quote a headline, and the post writes itself.

The above headline is not exactly as it appears in Yahoo News. Here’s the actual headline:

Vigilante violence disproportionately harms marginalized communities: Researchers

There’s not much difference between the two versions. Obviously, criminals will suffer disproportionately from vigilante justice, especially when it’s the ONLY JUSTICE.

Here’s more from (arguably) the most stupid article of 2023:

Researchers told ABC News that Neely’s death highlights how marginalized groups are disproportionately impacted by vigilante efforts, which can manifest in violence and even death.
“There’s a power imbalance that determines who’s seen as upholding what’s good and what’s right … and who’s more likely to be seen as violating social norms or doing something that’s wrong?” said Regina Bateson, a political scientist and professor at the University of Ottawa, in an interview with ABC News.

If there’s a “power imbalance,” it certainly didn’t help Kyle Rittenhouse much; he should never have even been charged. It didn’t help Eric Chauvin; he obviously had no intention of killing George Floyd, and should have been charged with manslaughter. It didn’t help Travis McMichael, Gregory McMichael, and William “Roddie” Bryan. who never should have been charged. Those last two trials were a mockery of what our court system is supposed to be. They’re a cruel joke.

If you’re looking for somebody who actually benefited from an “imbalance of power,” New York prosecutor Alvin Bragg appears to selectively prosecute based on race; he specifically stated that he’d refrain from prosecuting certain crimes. From the New York Post:

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced on taking office he would not prosecute even some very violent crimes.

Almost immediately after he distributed his now-infamous Day One memo, two police officers were killed and a few others shot.

A 19-year-old girl was shot and killed working at a Harlem Burger King. 

He is incompetent, and we knew this would happen — I and others warned of it during the campaign.

And that was way before he woke up one day and decided a former US president is one of the few people he would actually prosecute.

Things have not gotten better, only progressively worse (pun intended).

In his first year, Bragg downgraded 52% of felonies to misdemeanors — compared with 39% downgraded in 2019 — and had a dismal 51% conviction rate for felonies he did charge.

There are certain crimes that Bragg is enthusiastic about prosecuting. He prosecuted (White) Dominican Jose Alba for daring to fight back, and kill, a black criminal who was attacking him with a knife – only backing down after public outcry. He prosecuted Donald Trump for obviously political reasons, and for what should have been (at most) a misdemeanor.

O.J. Simpson benefited from an “imbalance of power,” so you see, this imbalance has been there for a long time.

We can clearly see where the imbalance of power lay – and it’s not in favor of White people.

The article goes on to state the usual garbage about “a history of lynching and oppression by Whites against blacks” completely ignoring the daily brutality Whites suffer from blacks, and have been suffering for a long time.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lahaina Noon in Puerto Plata

“The Tropics” are defined as the areas on Earth where the Sun is sometimes directly overhead. In the North, the Tropic of Cancer gets the Sun directly overhead on the Summer Solstice. In the South, the Tropic of Capricorn gets the Sun directly overhead on the Southern Summer Solstice (which is the Northern Winter Solstice).

If you live exactly on either the Tropic of Cancer, or the Tropic of Capricorn, then this will happen once a year. All the areas in between have this happen twice a year. It also happens twice a year on the Equator, once as the Sun moves (from our perspective) north, and once as it moves south.

Lahaina Noon occurs at High Noon. That’s the time of day when the Sun is the highest in the sky. During Lahaina Noon, this means the Sun is exactly at a 90 degree angle. If you put a stake in the ground, exactly perpendicular to the Earth’s surface, it will then have no shadow at all.

I’ve never experienced Lahaina Noon in my life, because I’ve never been in The Tropics on the correct dates, or I wasn’t aware of it. This year is different, and I tried to find out when it occurs for me, at least in the closest major city. I thought it would be easy.

Online searches only help with the dates and times in Hawai’i. The word “Lahaina” means “cruel Sun” in Hawai’ian. It’s considered “a thing” in Hawai’i. If you’re elsewhere, then you’re out of luck; the Internet won’t help you much. Asking artificial intelligence programs is also a waste of time.

Fortunately, there is a website that lists the dates and times for Lahaina Noon in certain Hawai’ian location. Among these locations is Hilo, which has almost the exact same latitude as Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic. Hilo is at 19.7216° N latitude. Puerto Plata is at 19.7808° N. Not much of a difference, so Lahaina Noon should be on the same day. Puerto Plata is a few hours ahead of Hilo, but I hoped it wouldn’t matter, and it shouldn’t matter enough to make a difference. Lahaina Noon should be on May 18th in both places.

When is High Noon in Puerto Plata on that day?

12:39.

So I got ready with my level, which I’d purchased for that purpose, my cell phone and a bottle of red wine, also purchased for this purpose.

The Lahaina gods smiled upon me, and there were no clouds. I verified that the bottle was perpendicular to the ground from all sides:

As we approached 12:39, the shadow got smaller and smaller:

Finally, perfection!

The small shadow around the base is simply because it’s tapered at the bottom.

Posted in travel | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Neo-Nazis: “We are Everywhere…” Yes, Apparently, They are

Here’s a screenshot of today’s Microsoft news feed – and yes, it’s probably just coincidence, but maybe not…

Neo-Nazi web-designers at Microsoft? Coincidence? What do you think?

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Was Biden Right About White-Supremacist Terror?

Here’s an answer I posted to Quora. Since it might get removed, I’m duplicating it here.

President Biden called ‘white supremacy’ ‘most dangerous terrorist threat’ at college speech: ‘Pure evil?’ Is he right?

People are quoting the FBI and Biden as if they’re impartial authorities on the matter. Unfortunately, they’re not. Biden has shown, throughout his presidency, that he considers White America to be his enemy. He’s signed executive order after executive order discriminating against White Americans. All of these are unconstitutional, and they ultimately get struck down by the courts – but this doesn’t stop them from being followed until then. You can read about some of them here.

Recently, whistle-blowers have come forward with claims that FBI agents are under pressure to investigate white-supremacist crime. There is ample reason to take these claims seriously. Whistle-blowers claim FBI is trying to find “White-Supremacy” even when it’s not there

The FBI defines domestic terrorism:

Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.”

From my own personal experience, and that of many others, I know that Antifa groups are responsible for a huge amount of domestic terrorism. I saw it with my own eyes, and was even a target of it. Rarely is this terrorism actually prosecuted or recorded as such. Leftists, being sympathetic to Antifa, will question this and call it “anecdotal evidence.” Look up Andy Ngo on Twitter. He’s got plenty of video documentation. In fact, he was a victim of Antifa terrorism.

Garbage in, garbage out. If only certain types of groups, as dictated by ideology, are targeted for investigation, then any “terrorism statistics” will be worthless. That is indeed the case.

A huge issue is the extent of cooperation between the FBI and the ADL. A search for ADL, on the FBI’s website, yields 18 results, all of them documenting their close relationship.

So what’s the problem? The problem is that a dive into the ADL’s studies of White-supremacy reveals grotesque bias and inconsistencies. You can read about it here.

… but there’s good news, if you’re lazy. You can simply ignore the observations of the above article and dismiss them without even looking at them – because American Renaissance is “racist.” Yes, you can have an easy life if you’re lazy. Even if American Renaissance was a rabid, hateful, neo-Nazi organization (which it’s not), the observations stand on their own merit.

That the FBI would ally with an organization such as the ADL speaks volumes about its own integrity – and lack of trustworthiness.

For many years, the FBI fudged White crime-rates by counting Latinos (of ANY RACE) as “white” if they were perpetrators, but gave them their own category as victims. It was an obvious ploy to make white crime-rates seem higher than they actually were. Repeated requests for an explanation went unanswered. Some states still do this. Texas for example:

I could go on and on, and this answer would be very long, but I’ll conclude with this:

White-supremacist terror DOES HAPPEN and it’s a real threat. Neo-Nazism appears to be growing, and we should address it.

I mentioned earlier that Biden has a problem with White America. So does much of the legacy media. So does much of the education system. Do people really believe that nobody will notice this? Do they actually think that, somehow, nobody will get upset enough to lash out violently as a result?

For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction, and I think Biden et. al. know what they’re doing. Each time a neo-Nazi kills people, it’s political points for them.

Posted in examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A Quora Answer That Might be Rejected

How much is black-on-white crime responsible for white-on-black racism?

The term “racism” needs a definition. For this answer, I’ll assume it means any negative sentiments toward American blacks as a group.

I’ve been active in the White-advocacy movement for many years now, both in real-life and online. I’ve met many people who identify as “White-advocates” or “White-nationalists” or “Alt-Right” etc. I’ve heard many stories, both in real-life and online, of how these individuals reached their current opinions.

Needless to say, many White-advocates do have negative sentiments toward American blacks. Why is this so?

Almost to a person, the story is the same: They were assaulted, robbed or raped by American blacks. Sometimes, the system robbed them by passing them over for a job or promotion in favor of a less-qualified black.

Predictably, some will say that those who lost out on jobs or promotions did so due to their own shortcomings. The truth is, we don’t know; we weren’t there. The fact remains that a vast system is in place to do exactly what these people claim happened to them. As long as the system is in place, we should not take such allegations lightly.

To the best of my knowledge, no studies have been done on this topic. There are no “official statistics” on the matter, because it’s forbidden to lay ANY OF THE RESPONSIBILITY for anti-black racism on blacks. This state of affairs may be politically expedient and safe, but it’s also naive, immature and irresponsible.

As a Jew, I say that my own people have, historically, shared SOME of the responsibility for persecution against us. For this I have been attacked… online anyway. My Jewishness has been questioned because of it. So be it; I’ll still speak my mind.

Some American blacks likewise speak up about black crime causing anti-black sentiments- and they’re also attacked. Those of us who speak out, whether Jewish or black, should pay no heed to useful idiots.

Back to the question at hand. As far as I can tell, a huge proportion of “racists” became that way due to black crime, and probably MOST of them. If black crime levels were to decrease to White levels today, it would take very little time for almost ALL anti-black sentiments to disappear. This is because “racists” don’t typically care about skin-color. We care about “content of character.”

For specific examples of black-on-White crime, browse through this space. It’s not specifically about this topic, but many of the posts pertain to it.

Note: I capitalize “White” and not “black” as pushback against corporate media’s pandering.

Edit: This submission was, in fact, rejected on Quora.

Posted in crime and violence, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | Tagged | 2 Comments

God Made Me Asian for a Reason

I’ve been saying this for a while, but I’m not Asian, so I couldn’t do the math as well as this guy:

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence | Tagged , | Leave a comment