San Francisco Makes Cultural Appropriation Illegal

Educated people have long known that every ethnicity in the US, with the exception of White people, is partial to its own group at the ballot box. Though there have been exceptions, for the most part, blacks will vote for a black candidate over a non-black one. Latinos are the same way, and so are Asians. Whites will either ignore race or actually vote for a candidate BECAUSE he is not White. I’ve seen it first-hand. Many Whites voted for Obama so that they could pat themselves on the back for supporting “America’s first black president.”

The City of San Francisco has decided that it would be illegal for non-Chinese candidates to pretend to be Chinese in order to gain Chinese votes. From The Northwest Asian Weekly:

San Francisco to enforce law against adopting Chinese names for political gain

San Francisco is cracking down on ballot name rules amid a trend of many non-Chinese candidates adopting a Chinese name in an effort to appeal to monolingual Chinese voters.

The city’s Department of Elections will now enforce a 2019 state law that bars political candidates from using a Chinese name on a city ballot unless a name has been given to them at birth or used for at least two years. 

Because of the city’s robust Chinese-speaking population, ballots are in both English and Chinese, which has led many non-Chinese candidates to adopt a Chinese name…

Chan called the trend a form of “cultural appropriation.”

While the law will prevent non-Chinese candidates from abusing the flexibility of self-submitted names, it may also impact American-born Chinese candidates who do not have a birth certificate in Chinese that proves they were born with Chinese names.

This is wrong on several levels.

Firstly, a Chinese person who immigrates to the United States should consider himself “American,” not “Chinese.” After all, he made a choice to move to the US. If he wishes to be Chinese, he should have stayed in China.

Secondly, it’s morally dubious to encourage ethnic groups to show ethnic loyalty at the ballot box. To enforce such preferences by law is unacceptable – especially considering the fact that Whites are not allowed to openly do so.

Thirdly, this looks like a violation of the First Amendment. If an American of Chinese origin is allowed to list his name, on a ballot, in Chinese, then the same right should apply to everybody.

Fourthly, this is a violation of equal protection under the law. If this law is allowed to stand, then we might see a prohibition against non-blacks from using black-sounding names on ballots – or non-Jews from using Jewish-sounding names on ballots.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

October 7th Justifications Set a Precedent

Reading the pro-Palestinian arguments on various media, we see a recurrent theme:

Given Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinians, especially during recent years of Netanyahu’s term, the Hamas attacks were understandable, if not justified. For example:

Gad Saad on X: “Given the October 7th Hamas massacre, what should the Israeli response have been to ensure that anti-Israel detractors would consider it as justifiable? Please provide all relevant logic and details metric.” / X (twitter.com)

@ArchPhantom94 Given the decades long Israeli occupation of Palestinians, what should the Palestinian response have been to ensure that the anti-Palestinian detractors would consider it as justifiable? Please provide all relevant logic and details metric.

What are the accusations against Israel? Amnesty International, which is curiously silent about the ongoing destruction of Native European communities in their home lands, is quick to condemn Israel for its abuse of Palestinians:

An Israeli court has given the go-ahead for the forced eviction of 500 Palestinian Bedouins in the Negev/Naqab region, highlighting the deep discrimination that Palestinian citizens of Israel face under apartheid, Amnesty International said today. In a judgment issued on 27 July, the Beer’sheva Magistrate’s Court said residents of the village of Ras Jrabah must leave their homes, and vacate the lands where their families have lived for decades, by March 2024. They must also pay a fine of 117,000 NIS (approximately 31,700 USD) to cover legal expenses. 

This seems eerily similar to the way European governments are removing Native Europeans from their apartments, and replacing them with migrants, or how government policies are encouraging hotels and nursing homes to replace downtrodden American homeless with migrants. These policies disproportionately affect White people, and they’re being implemented all over Western Europe and America. Additionally, the influx of hordes of military-aged men, into small communities, makes life too dangerous for many Native Europeans, especially women and girls – who must alter their behavior in order to stay safe.

The European Union, and its vassal states, have invited millions of young men, from backward countries, into Europe. The predictable result has been an ongoing wave of rapes against Native European women and girls. It’s unreasonable to claim that the elites were somehow unaware of this. Punishment for the migrant rapists has been all but nonexistent, laughable if it weren’t so tragic. We can only conclude that the EU, and its vassal states, are using rape-by-proxy as a weapon of war against Europe’s native populations. They’ve expressed a desire for more mixed-race people in Europe and rape is one means toward that end.

Even as this onslaught goes on, the powers-that-be in Europe publish anti-White propaganda to the public. For example, here. European institutions actively discriminate against Native Europeans in hiring. For example, here. European governments are severely curtailing freedom of speech, so that Native Europeans risk prison and fines if they dare speak out. For example, here. European governments belittle, and degrade, Native European history and its heroes. For example, here. Europe and America have a two-tiered “justice system,” with harsher penalties for Whites. For example, here and here.

There is no evidence that Israel has been using rape as a weapon of war against Palestinians, nor are Palestinians targeted for replacement in all their native lands; there will always be plenty of them in Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. In these regards, Native Europeans have suffered more than Palestinians.

Using the logic of the pro-Palestinian crowd, would it be justified for Native Europeans to go on rape and slaughter rampages? If Native Europeans lashed out against decades of genocidal policies, by implementing a “Final Solution” upon the black and brown hordes that have descended upon Europe, would we see huge protests in their defense? Would college and university organizations, celebrities, NGOs and politicians publicly support them?

We might see isolated voices, from the right, explaining WHY this Final Solution came about – and those people would quickly be accused of “excusing murder, rape and genocide.” They would be cancelled in a heartbeat.

In fairness, some pro-Palestinian people have been cancelled, losing their jobs and being publicly rebuked – but due to The Great Replacement, the younger generation is sympathetic to the Palestinians (non-Whites will always be favored over Whites in their world-view). Hence, such cancellations have an expiration date. As the older generation dies off, favoritism toward official victims (IE. non-Whites) will increasingly solidify and be encoded into law and policy.

Posted in crime and violence, freedom of speech issues, government/corporate discrimination against whites, immigration/ Hispanics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Taki Takes the Palestinian Side in Conflict

Since I’m a Jew, I have a natural bias toward my own people. This is natural and to be expected, but that’s not to say that Jews cannot take the opposite side occasionally. This does not automatically make one a “self-hating Jew.” Sometimes, there could be valid reasons for siding against your own people.

Does Taki have valid reasons? Here’s what he writes, quoting Professor David Shulman:

It is a regime of state terror whose raison d’être is the theft of Palestinian land and, whenever possible, the expulsion of its Palestinian owners. I have seen this system in operation over the course of the past twenty odd years.

Taki goes on to write:

I’ve met a lot of Israelis who not only agree with him, but are adamant that Israel under Netanyahu has become an occupying power bent on capturing the whole West Bank. One thing is for sure, and I will get to the Hamas outrage and the Israeli reaction later on: To Palestinians living under the occupation over the past several years, state violence against them has escalated dramatically.

It is hard for me to describe what I’ve seen with my own eyes when Jewish religious fanatics—or settlers, as they’re called—mostly young men and women imbued with a burning, racist hate for Palestinians, come face-to-face with them. The Israeli army and the police, supposedly neutral, invariably side with the settlers, and thus one more Arab village empties out with religious fanatics moving in. The plan is a simple one and openly espoused by government officials: If life becomes unbearable, the Palestinians will leave and go to Jordan or Saudi Arabia, or anywhere, and the whole West Bank will be Jewish.

I’m not an expert on Israel, or Jewish-Palestinian relations, but I did spend a few years there, and I did witness some of what Taki is referring to. It bothered me at the time, and it bothered my friends… most of them; one of my friends was a settler, and he treated random Arabs very poorly.

I do have a soft spot for Palestinians, and this is as good a place as any to dispel the popular notion that “Palestinians are not a people.”

It may be true that the nation of Palestine is not mentioned until very recently, and it may be true that there was no political entity of that name, unless we go back to the Philistines, and that was a completely different nation; the ancient Philistines were Indo-European, and had nothing to do with the modern Palestinians, except for the name and probably some residual genes.

All that may be true, but whether they had a specific name or political entity doesn’t negate the fact that every human population, which has occupied a piece of land for hundreds/thousands of years, is a nation. Even if they were part of a larger (Jordanian/Syrian) nation at one time, this doesn’t mean they can’t be considered their own nation – especially if history has deprived them of a state. Whether it’s their fault or not is also irrelevant. Even if there was no “Palestinian people” prior to the 1960s, that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist now.

In the past, I’ve written that White-Americans are a people in the making. Government persecution, systemic marginalization and replacement policies are forging a new people. We might say the same about the Palestinians – taking Taki at his word.

I sympathize, to a point, with Palestinians because in some ways, they resemble Ancient Jews more than modern Jews resemble ancient Jews – and Israel’s Europeanization policies have made this even more so. Modern “Hebrew” sounds like German, and far less like Classical Hebrew than does modern Palestinian Arabic. Unless things have changed, the Israeli government subsidizes bread – but only European-style bread, not the flat bread that Oriental Jews traditionally ate.

Israeli Jews are more civilized than Palestinians. The don’t “honor-kill” their daughters or publicly rejoice when their children blow themselves up. To the best of my knowledge, an Arab is a lot safer in a Jewish area than a Jew would be in an Arab area, even if he were allowed to live there.

Taki claims that anti-Arab persecution has grown worse in recent years. While I don’t support brutality, or injustice, to anybody, there are two facts we should bear in mind:

  1. As badly as Arabs may be treated in Israel today, when Arabs were in charge, Jews were treated worse – and there’s no reason to believe this would change in the future if Arabs gained control.
  2. In a multicultural society, there is no such thing as “equality,” much less “equity.” One group will always dominate the other(s).

Jews should be the group that dominates in the Land of Israel; it’s our only homeland. Personally, I believe that such domination should be with a soft touch. Unnecessary aggression, stealing land, destroying homes or businesses, beatings, humiliations etc. should not be tolerated – but the law should recognize Jewish supremacy, much as Muslim governments recognize Islamic superiority.

Taki makes much of the fact that Palestinians suffer in their camps. I never visited one of those camps, but I knew somebody who did. It was a rabbi, and he had gone there to collect money owed him by the Palestinian. When he arrived, and he witnessed the grinding poverty, he realized it was a lost cause. He returned home empty-handed.

I won’t pretend to know the reasons Palestinians suffer so much; it might have something to do with their propensity for violence – which goes back decades before the State of Israel was even founded. Israel responds by making it more difficult to find work. Poverty is a result.

At this point, it seems clear to me that both sides have erred. People like to characterize Israel as the responsible party, since it has the state and a powerful military. I don’t believe this is entirely true. Demographics, especially on the global scale, favor the Palestinians. The Great Replacement has ensured that Israel’s old allies in America and Europe will shift loyalties toward the Palestinians. As electorates become more and more brown and black, sympathy toward Israel will disappear. Politicians will follow suit, as will foreign policy. In the long run, Israel is the underdog.

In conclusion, Israel’s abuses and bad policies notwithstanding, I think that if the Palestinians were to collectively recognize Israel’s right to exist, and announce a willingness to forgive the past and make a fresh start, that would force Israel to change its ways. It would be far more effective than killing babies and raping women.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , | 2 Comments

I Congratulated a Dutchman Today

I was at the beach with friends, and there was a man there I didn’t recognize. Introducing myself, he revealed that he’s Dutch. Naturally, I congratulated him on the recent election, in which Girt Wilders won the most seats. He wasn’t the first Dutchman I’d congratulated – but he was the first to disagree.

It turned out he’s a socialist, and a brainwashed lemming who actually believes the globalist narrative.

He told me that “all of the migrants are working,” but that an economy needs about 4% of its population to be out of work – so that they can be available when jobs materialize.

I wasn’t in the mood to argue, and arguing politics at the beach with a bunch of guys is not a winning proposition…

However, I mulled over what he had said, and I wondered about a few things:

Let’s assume that he’s right about the economy, that the migrants are good for the economy, that they contribute mightily, and that the Netherlands needs 4% of its population idle.

If we accept all this, then we must conclude that the Netherlands’ economy will continue to thrive (he told me the Wilders cannot form a coalition, so he won’t be able to deport anybody).

With a thriving economy, it’s obvious that more and more migrants will arrive. It’s also obvious that, with their bourgeoning population, their political clout will grow.

It’s obvious that they’re not going to abandon Islam in large numbers. On the contrary, they might become even more radical, as we’ve seen in the rest of Western Europe.

Additionally, African/MENA migrants have higher birthrates than Native Europeans. It’s inevitable that they will dominate the country, rule over the natives, and replace the native population.

If there’s a mechanism whereby they will either a) assimilate into Dutch society or b) decrease in number over time I’d like to know what it is – because nobody with power, in Western Europe, has a plan to make this happen. At least nobody has a plan that could actually work.

Therefore, I’d like to people such as the one I met today:

Is the economy more important to you than the very survival of your people? Is it more important than the freedom of your descendants?

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, Muslims, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , | Leave a comment

I’m So Glad I Left the Portland Area

Hardly a day goes by that I don’t pat myself on the back for leaving the wreck of a country that is the United States, and specifically the Portland area.

I still read the Nextdoor posts associated with my old area. Recently, I discovered that electric bill are set to increase by 17% next year. Crime is still out of control – and I saw this first-hand during my most recent stay. It’s ridiculous.

Here’s a Nextdoor post I just saw today:

My sister and I reside in central Beaverton in a home we have owned for decades. She posted on here about things we have had to encounter on our property in the last couple months. Our house has been broken into and she had hot coffee thrown in her face by a man in our backyard. There have been many more things, but i will not go into them here because apparently nextdoor frowns on people sharing negative occurrences involving the “houseless”. Somehow this is disparaging our homeless community and further making them victims. If this is not a platform to inform eachother and caution eachother then what is it? They have suspended her account for this. She makes her living by reselling things on this platform. So not cool. We came home last night after dinner to find someone had attemped to kick in our back door, damaging the moulding, doorknob and lock. They were only a couple kicks away from getting in. Who knows what would have happened if we came home and interrupted a burglary. Now we have to come up with the finances for repairing the door and a full on surveillance system which won’t be easy as i live month to month on disability and she can no longer sell on this platform. I hope this post doesn’t go against nextdoor’s guidelines, but think this is a safety concern that people need to be made aware of. Thank you.

During my four-month stint in the Portland area, I was renting a room in what I thought was a nice area: Tigard. It looks fairly affluent, has lots of trees and parks, and there are plenty of shops nearby…

… but I soon discovered that loud cars race by at all hours of the night, even on the small residential street where I lived. Laws against loud vehicles are on the books, but there is no enforcement.

During the brief time I was there, my landlord’s car was broken into, which she caught on her ring camera. They appeared to be Mexicans. Not long after that, a neighbor’s car was stolen right off the parking lot. Also, somebody had pooped right outside our street window. Owning a car and parking there was dicey. It’s one reason I chose to sell my car, especially considering my model was a targeted type of vehicle both for auto theft and catalytic converter theft.

Things are good for me here in Dominican Republic. I have plenty of friends, politics (if any) are low-key. I don’t have to worry about Antifa confronting me as I go about my business. I feel safe, and I get to swim at a beautiful beach almost every day. Snorkeling is good too. Maybe I’ll include an underwater video some time. Things have gone up in price here, but it’s still much more affordable than in most of the US.

If shoplifting is a problem, it’s not a huge one. God help the shoplifter if he’s caught. Products aren’t locked up, and there’s no gang activity that I’ve noticed. We do have petty crime – mostly targeting drunk gringos in the wee hours on the street. We have pickpockets and those who will swipe your valuables if you’re too distracted. Luckily, it hasn’t happened to me.

They’ve got some interesting mannequins around here:

Posted in travel | 5 Comments

Why are they called “Islamists?”

Over and over again, I see “conservatives” using the term “Islamist” to describe Muslims who act badly. When I see this, and when possible, I ask them, “What is an Islamist?”

I did this on Quora, and here are the results:

It wasn’t long ago that I had a minor debate with a leftist relative. I used the term “Oriental” to describe East Asians. She said I should use the term “Asian” instead – because people deserve to be called what they call themselves. Let’s use that principle here; I’ve never heard of a “political Muslim” refer to himself as an “Islamist.”

What do they call political Christians? I’ve never heard the term “Christianist.” What about political Hindus? Political Jews are pretty much called Zionists – and most people in the West support that.

Why is it only Muslims who merit this kind of treatment, where the dangerous ones are excluded from the larger “Muslim” community, and given their own category?

I’ll tell you why. It’s because ALL real Islam is “Islamist.” By its very nature, it’s a political ideology – but leftists can’t bear the thought of condemning all Muslims in this way. The term “Islamist” is a mental trick. It’s a sneaky psychological deceit to make it seem like “mainstream Islam” is not a threat. It’s only the “Islamists” we need to worry about, but “normal Muslims” are harmless and wholesome.

“Conservatives” who buy into this farce are either leftist infiltrators or just plain stupid. Every time we see or hear the term “Islamist,” we need to loudly object.

Posted in Muslims, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Leave a comment

Israel Must Ignore “International Law”

Warning! The following video depicts gratuitous killing. Don’t watch it if you’re easily disturbed by such scenes. It disturbed me, but I watched it to the end – so that I could write about it.

Gazan men, trying to flee south, are mass executed by Hamas.

If you did watch until the end, you might have noticed that at least one of the executioners was having fun killing his own countrymen, his fellow Muslims. It was a game to him.

If you doubt the stories about decapitated babies, and other atrocities committed on October 7th, consider this: If Hamas considers the lives of its OWN CITIZENS to be as worthless as we see in this video, how little value must they attribute to the lives of Jews?

The demands of Western politicians, including Joe Biden, that Israel adhere to “international law,” are not only misplaced, but grossly misplaced. Such demands are so ridiculous that they need to be ignored, and I hope they are ignored. We cannot demand that only one side adhere to “international law,” while the other side does not even recognized such guidelines or standards – except when it’s politically expedient for them to do so.

It’s true that Western nations also have a history of executing deserters. Generally speaking, I oppose such executions; most wars are fought for the benefit of the elites. Today, they’re typically fought for government bureaucrats and corporations.

In Gaza, this is certainly the case. Hamas wants to cling to power for the benefit of its own elite – who live in luxury far from the fighting. Gazans, who suffer from a low average IQ (partly due to widescale cousin-marriages) might not realize it, but they’re much better off under Israeli rule than under Hamas. This invasion, painful as it is, has the potential of greatly improving the lives of Gazans in the long run. The United States has invaded countries to liberate them from lesser atrocities; it has no moral right to demand a ceasefire.

I do feel badly for the men who were killed, and for their families. They were truly stuck between a rock and a hard place. They did what they felt needed to be done, what the invading army DEMANDED that they do – and this is what happened to them. We can assume the worst for the women who were caught trying to flee.

Many innocents have died in this war and will continue to do so. At this point, we can only hope that their sacrifice will not have been completely in vain. We can hope that some good will come of it.

My wish list would include:

  1. Greater awareness of the evils of Islam, and greater pushback against it.
  2. Greater security for Israelis, with a more secure border.
  3. Greater freedom for Gazans, including freedom of religion and freedom of speech.
  4. Greater pushback against mass migration in Western lands, hopefully culminating in mass deportations.
  5. A wider recognition that, just as Jews have a right to live in peace and security, so too do Whites. This should not be controversial.
Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, Jewish stuff and Israel, Muslims, politics, Religion | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Two-State Solution; Let’s Do It!

White House occupant Joe Biden has recently promoted a “two-state solution” to the Israel/Palestinian conflict. From MSN:

On the 18th (local time), President Joe Biden of the United States visited Israel and proposed a ‘two-state solution’ by establishing a Palestinian state to solve the long-standing conflict between Israel and Palestine. He also pledged $100 million in humanitarian aid to Gaza and the West Bank.

According to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), on the 18th, President Biden said at a press conference after a meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Tel Aviv, Israel, “We must continue to pursue a solution where both Israeli and Palestinian residents can live safely with dignity and peace. This means a ‘two-state solution’.” The two-state solution refers to the coexistence of Israel and Palestine as two separate states.

In other words, it makes perfect sense to have an autonomous state right next to the tiny State of Israel. This autonomous state will be a Palestinian-nationalist state, whose stated purpose is to eradicate Israel, kill all the Jews, and impose Islamic law upon all residents…

If this makes sense to Mr. Biden, then I’d like to propose another two-state solution – based upon Biden’s own words:

President Joe Biden denounced white supremacy as the “most dangerous terrorist threat” to the nation in his commencement address to Howard University’s graduating class Saturday.

“White supremacy … is the single most dangerous terrorist threat in our homeland,” Biden said.

Unlike Islamic Palestinian nationalism, White-nationalists very seldom promote the eradication of other races, they very rarely descend upon non-White people and murder babies, and they have no “holy book” that makes them believe that their destiny is to rule the world. On the contrary, the vast majority of White-nationalists only want to rule over THEMSELVES.

Therefore, if a two-state solution makes sense for Israel and Palestine, how much more so would it make sense for multi-racial America and White-advocates. Set aside a portion of the United States, and grant autonomy to White people.

If it’s good for the Palestinians, then it’s good for Whites – but consistency is too much to expect from our current White House resident.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, Muslims, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism, politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Rideshare; Who Slams Doors?

After almost 6 years of driving rideshare, about 3 of those years full-time, I’ve become an expert on passenger behavior. Now that I’m retired, I’m free to share my observations.

Generally speaking, rideshare drivers appreciate it when passengers are gentle with doors. Newer cars, which we are usually required to use for this service, require only the gentlest push to close the doors; anything more than that can easily be considered “slamming.”

What’s the harm in slamming? Firstly, the weather-strips take a beating. I had to replace the weather-strip on the right rear door twice – at $70 a pop. Secondly, in some model cars, the seatbelt doesn’t consistently retract, and slamming the door means that there will be indentations where the seatbelt is crushed against the door. Thirdly, slamming can be loud, and it can be annoying having to hear it dozens of times a day. Fourthly, the sensor can get damaged. This was the case in my most recent (rental) car; the “door open” alarm would sound randomly, and the rear right door would have to be opened and closed again.

Not all demographics behave equally when it comes to door-slamming. Here’s what I’ve noticed:

Latinos are, by far, the most respectful toward our cars. As a rule, they’re gentle with the doors. This only applies to Latinos who were born outside the United States. Those who were born in the United States behave the same as other Americans. That is to say, they can go either way.

Women are much worse than men. While travelling, I had an Uber driver bring this up to me, and I’m sure many other rideshare drivers have noticed this phenomenon.

East Asians are slightly worse than Whites, and blacks are slightly better than Whites. I think this latter observation might only apply to the Portland area and similar areas. I say this because the native blacks of Portland seem to be more friendly overall. Sadly, I’ve seen this change recently as more East Coast blacks move in. Many of my most pleasant passengers have been black women.

Any group of 3 or 4 (4 being the maximum for most cars) passengers is going to slam the doors. I don’t know how such a group of Latinos would behave, as I’ve never had one – but if you see such a group (non-Latino) about to get into your car, you’re about to get slammed, almost guaranteed. If it’s a group of women, then God help you.

I’m not going to share my theories in this post. If you do have a theory, share it in comments.

Posted in rideshare | Tagged , | Leave a comment

You Can’t Win with Multiculturalism

In case you’re wondering why I haven’t written about the atrocities in Israel, and the justified Israeli reaction, it’s because the subject has already been written about a million times. I really can’t add much to what has already been said.

But actually, I can:

Biden sent arms to, and spoke in favor of, Israel. For this, he’s facing fierce criticism. McDonalds Israel distributed free food to Israeli soldiers. As a result, there are calls for a boycott against the franchise. Everybody, including top politicians and corporate CEOs, has an opinion – and it appears that there are no “safe opinions” in this matter. No matter what you say, you’re going to offend somebody.

Isn’t this the essence of multiculturalism? “Many cultures in one land.” In other words, many points of view, and many loyalties, in one land.

Establishment leftists have, to a certain degree, become spoiled; they’ve gotten used to being mouthpieces for official “truths” and approved opinions. In recent days, they’ve discovered what many of us have known for years: One cannot be pro-(fill in the ethnicity) without being anti-(fill in the other ethnicity). Today, “pro-Jewish” means “anti-Palestinian,” and “pro-Palestinian” means “anti-Jewish.” There’s very little middle ground.

Since Jews are, by and large, more White than Palestinians, Establishment Left support for the latter was predictable. We would have been shocked if Yale student groups did NOT come out in favor of Hamas. We would have scratched our heads if BLM had not done the same. Both did so – and found out that their “approved truth” isn’t necessarily “approved” anymore. Both organizations find themselves in murky waters of their own making.

Jews are a nation, and Palestinians are a nation. America is no longer a nation, and (increasingly) neither are the historic countries of Western Europe. Western countries have lost their nationhood due to multiculturalism, and the mass migration that comes with it.

It’s patriotic for a Jew to support his own people, and it’s patriotic for a Palestinian to support his – but there is no single patriotic stance, in this conflict, for Americans. The official view is that pretty much anybody who lives here is “American,” whether legally or not. Officially, the opinions of hordes of illegal immigrants, who just crossed the Rio Grande, are as valid as the opinions of descendants of the Mayflower. Increasingly, those illegal immigrants, or at least their children, vote in our elections. Unlike founding-stock Americans, these invaders form strong voting blocks. In a democracy, what this means is that we’ve allowed them to rule over us.

Henry Kissinger, recently interviewed, opined that Europe had allowed too many foreigners to enter. At 100 years old, he can say anything he wants. It was pointed out that the same is true of America, and Kissinger should have said so. Perhaps he considered that too controversial. A true American patriot would have found NOTHING too controversial when it comes to the future of his nation. Perhaps he realizes that we no longer have a nation.

For now, Establishment Left elders still cling to old alliances, and a few old values. As they die out, Israel will find itself without allies. As a Jew, this is not a pleasant thought to ponder.

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, Jewish stuff and Israel, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Leave a comment