USA Today: Fact-checking the Fact-checkers

Posted on April 9, 2021 by jewamongyou

Through deceptive and manipulative reporting, Camille Caldera of USA Today is guilty of lying to her readers. From a “fact check” article from September of 2020:

Fact check: Rates of white-on-white and Black-on-Black crime are similar

The claim: There are significant race-based disparities in civilian homicide rates, but not in police homicide rates.

A viral meme purports to list homicide statistics by race in the United States, as follows:

Whites killing Blacks — 2%

Police killing whites — 3%

Whites killing whites — 16%

Blacks killing whites — 81%

Police killing Blacks — 1%

Blacks killing Blacks — 97%

So far, so good. If the claim being debunked is that 81% of white homicide victims are murdered by blacks, then we should all agree; this claim is false. Most white homicide victims are murdered by other whites.

And the article goes on:

Though the numbers differ year-to-year, the stark difference that the viral post attempts to portray between the rates of white-on-white and Black-on-Black homicide — which it puts at 16% and 97%, respectively — is inaccurate.

Yes. If we compare the rates of INTERRACIAL homicides to the rates of INTRARACIAL homicides, then there’s not that much of a difference – but what this “fact check” fails to point out is that the overall number are VASTLY different when we compare black homicide rates to white homicide rates. Therefore, the raw numbers of black-on-white homicides are much higher than the raw numbers of white-on-black homicides. The article appears to intentionally give the impression that this is not so; it does so by negligently omitting this fact. I’d be willing to wager that the average reader would interpret this article as saying that the black homicide rate is about the same as the white homicide rate. Of course, this is NOT what the article is saying – but I believe that it purposefully gives this impression.

The article concludes with the following:

Based on our research, all six purported homicide statistics in the viral post are FALSE. The significant race-based disparities are also false. In reality, rates of white-on-white and Black-on-Black homicides are similar and remain within 10 percentage points of each other, around 80% and 90%, respectively. Likewise, rates of Black-on-white and white-on-Black homicide remain within eight percentage points of each other, at around 16% and 8%. And police kill Black people at disproportionate and much higher rates than they kill their white counterparts.

I’ll conclude with the following:

While this USA Today fact check is technically correct, insofar as the claimed interracial crime statistics are false, by failing to note that black homicide rates are much higher than those of other ethnic groups, it gives the false impression that there is no such disparity at all. Let’s take a look at the number one source cited by the USA Today article itself (US Dept. of Justice):

Blacks were disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rate for blacks (27.8 per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000). The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000) (table 1)…

While two-thirds of drug-related homicides were committed by black offenders (65.6%), black offenders were less likely to be involved in sex-related killings (43.4%), workplace homicides, (25.8%) or homicides of elders age 65 or older (41.9%) compared to their overall involvement as homicide offenders (52.5%).

As for interracial homicide, the same source provides this graph showing that in raw numbers, there were about twice as many whites murdered by blacks as there were blacks murdered by whites:

A glance at USA Today’s second cited source (FBI – Crime in the US) confirms that this disparity increased in 2018, with 514 whites murdered by blacks – but only 234 blacks murdered by whites.

It’s wildly inappropriate and irresponsible to address the topic of interracial homicide without even bothering to bring this up; it’s lying by omission.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Biden Cites Black-on-White Homocide

Posted on April 8, 2021 by jewamongyou

How often have we heard the mantra that black-on-white gun violence is not an issue, that it’s a rare exception to the rule that gun violence is overwhelmingly intra-racial? Too often to count.

In 2018, the SPLC told us that:

One of the most exaggerated statistics was about the number of white people killed by other white people. Trump’s tweet claimed the number was 16 percent, while the FBI’s data shows it is 82 percent. The tweet also asserted that 81 percent of whites are killed by black people; the FBI number is 15 percent. As the Post concluded, “Trump cast blacks as the primary killers of whites, but the exact opposite is true. By overwhelming percentages, whites tend to kill other whites. Similarly, blacks tend to kill other blacks. These trends have been observed for decades.”

Yes, it’s true that most homicides are intra-racial – but this hasn’t stopped BLM from focusing exclusively on white cop-on-black incidents, while ignoring black-on-black incidents. It hasn’t stopped the SPLC from focusing exclusively on white-on-black homicides, which was brought up earlier in the same article, and described as “horrific violence.”

The SPLC, as far as I can tell, only brings up the Knoxville Horror (obviously, not by that name) 4 times on it’s website, based on results when we type “Channon Christian” or “Christopher Newsome” into their search bar. While it does describe the crime as “horrific” the point of all these articles is to claim that the incident is “exploited to attack blacks.”

Meanwhile, a search for Dylan Roof yields 14 results; all of these articles focus on white-on-black crime. It’s true that the body-count in the Roof incident was higher than the Knoxville Horror, but reasonable people would argue that the sheer sadism that the Knoxville perpetrators visited upon their victims more than makes up for this. Both incidents were horrific – but only the Dylan Roof incident advances the agenda of the SPLC in its own right. In citing both crimes, the SPLC’s only concern is the welfare of blacks; the welfare of whites is not even on its radar.

The reason I bring up the SPLC is that the FBI and much of the Corporate Media drink from its tainted well.

A Google search for “Is black on white violence a problem?” yields results that are almost exclusively about “black on black crime.” The only first-page exception is an SPLC article titled “The biggest lie in the white-supremacist propaganda.” In contrast, the same search in Duckduckgo yields results that are actually relevant.

The powers that be obviously want us to ignore black-on-white crime, or at least to consider it a non-issue.

And yet Biden has just cited the massacre of a white family, by a black man, to support his gun-control agenda. In other words, black-on-white crime is only useful as a tool to promote an anti-gun agenda. Rest assured that no reporters will be asking Biden about the racial aspect of the above massacre in his next press conference.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda, guns and gun-control | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Taking Time-Preference to New Levels

Posted on April 6, 2021 by jewamongyou

By now, most of y’all have read about the woman who fired at Burger King employees because they were taking too long to provide her food.

I can sympathize with her; it’s frustrating when employees seem to place little value on your time. Just yesterday, I was at a UPS store, and the two employees were chatting away – ignoring me, even though I was the only customer. I wasn’t carrying at the time, so shooting at them was out of the question. Hell, I didn’t even have my pepper spray with me. With few other options, I waited for a couple of minutes and then said, “Excuse me!” That did the trick, and no shots were fired.

Nobody deserves to be shot at for being too slow at their job, especially when they’re making $9/hr. What kind of person shoots at Burger King workers?

Answer: Somebody with an especially high time-preference. In tropical climates, food is relatively abundant, and once it’s acquired, it will spoil quickly. It makes more sense to eat it immediately than to save it for later. In contrast, this type of behavior would be fatal in colder climates, where one must store food for the winter.

It’s been pointed out that American blacks invest less for the future, even accounting for income:

Several studies have tried to explain the wealth divide. Smith (1995a) reported that it is due in part to lower minority incomes, poorer health, and smaller inheritances. Even after controlling for income and demographic factors, Blau and Graham (1990) found that almost three-quarters of the black-white wealth gap could not be explained; they speculated that differences in intergenerational transfers and, to a smaller extent, barriers to the accumulation of home and business equity might be responsible.4 Altonji, Doraszelski, and Segal (2001), who also determined that income and demographics play a small role, have suggested that differences in saving behavior and rates of return on assets may be more important than intergenerational transfers in explaining the wealth gap…

The present analysis finds that at every income quartile and education level, minority households are less likely than white households to own a wide variety of assets–particularly riskier, higher-yielding assets. This finding suggests that minority and white households approach saving differently.

It’s a complex issue, and it’s important to bear in mind that a high time-preference among blacks today (leading them to invest less of their income) also applied to their ancestors – leading to differences in generational wealth. Therefore, pointing to generational wealth differences does not automatically mean that a high time-preference has nothing to do with it.

High crime-rates among black Americans can also be explained by a high time-preference. After all, if the individual is more concerned with venting his anger in the present, than possible repercussions in the future, he’s more likely to act out.

Most black people don’t shoot at fast food workers for taking too long to prepare their order, but it seems likely that the woman in question represents an extreme case of high time-preference, and we find many more of these among blacks than among other demographics.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, Race science | 2 Comments

Chicago Unheard

Posted on April 3, 2021 by jewamongyou

My friend, Diversity Chronicle, sent me an article from the “Chicago Unheard” blog. My friend pointed out that the article is pure, unadulterated, hogwash. It claims that white people, specifically white liberals, are “racist” for clinging to one of the few shreds of humanity they still have: Caring about their own children.

Many White folks, especially northern white liberals who voted for Obama, would argue they are not racist, even while they actively cause harm to Black folks by their racist actions.  

Since so many people don’t know what racism is or how they are racist, here are three racist things that northern White liberals do: 

1. Engage in “White flight”—when poor Black folks move close to White folks, they flee and move to racially segregated, high-income communities. Today, White flight can also take on subtler forms, especially involving schooling—it can be the decision to apply for a magnet school with more white students than a family’s neighborhood school.

2. Live in high-income, racially-segregated communities that are not accessible to poor Black folks. 

3. Enroll their children in racially-segregated, high-income schools that are not accessible to poor Black folks. 

It never occurs to the author, ShaRhonda Knott-Dawson, that parents don’t want their children to suffer the attacks and indignities that I suffered in majority-black schools. Yes, protecting your own kids from harm is now “racist!”

The article is such drivel that it doesn’t merit a point-by-point refutation. I did want to draw attention to the name of the blog: Chicago Unheard.

It’s a common tactic, among Communists, to describe things as the opposite of what they really are. Just as they love to accuse their opponents of crimes that they, themselves, are guilty of, so too do they describe their own narratives as “unheard.” They like to think of themselves as downtrodden and “marginalized.”

I couldn’t help but notice that Chicago Unheard has a Twitter page and a Facebook page; it hasn’t been cancelled. So much for being “unheard.” In real life, people who are “unheard” are censored by those in power.

The blog is managed by a “liberal white person” named Maureen Kelleher. She is also a senior writer and editor at Brightbeam. Who supports Brightbeam?

We’re grateful to our funders, Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Walton Family Foundation, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the City Fund, for helping support the work of dozens of advocates, activists and contributors all across the country.

It turns out that Brightbeam is funded by some of the wealthiest people on Earth. Considering the above, the name “Chicago Unheard” rings hollow.

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BLM Wants to Lynch Derek Chauvin

Posted on March 30, 2021 by jewamongyou

Anastasia Katz, writing for American Renaissance, sums up the attitude toward Derek Chauvin within black officialdom:

Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin’s murder trial began yesterday, accompanied by all the expected theatrics.

Reverend Al Sharpton has held several press conferences recently, accompanied by members of George Floyd’s family and their attorney Ben Crump, who represented them in the civil suit against the city of Minneapolis, which resulted in a $27 million settlement. On Sunday, Rev. Sharpton spoke at a Baptist Church in Minneapolis, saying “Chauvin is in the courtroom, but America is on trial.”

On Monday morning, Rev. Sharpton again stood before the press and called George Floyd’s death a “lynching by knee.” He led those assembled as they took a knee for eight minutes and 46 seconds — the time that former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin restrained Floyd. Some of those surrounding Mr. Sharpton were wearing facemasks with “8:46” and a flatlined heartbeat printed on them. The group then chanted, “No justice! No peace!”

Like most Americans, I’ve stumbled upon many statements by BLM supporters expressing a desire to punish Mr. Chauvin, and that the jury can only reach one acceptable verdict: Guilty!

If Mr. Chauvin were released in the midst of a BLM crowd, would there be any doubt what would happen to him? Of course not; he would be lynched.

I’ve already pointed out that BLM supports slavery. Now we see that it also supports lynching. Does it support segregation? Indeed:

LUNATICS: ‘Orthodox’ Jews Forced To Leave #BLM Riots In Philly For “Showing Solidarity”

Yes folks, BLM stands for slavery, segregation and lynching. Doesn’t sound very “progressive” to me.

Posted in Africa and blacks, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Happy Passover!

Posted on March 28, 2021 by jewamongyou

To all my Jewish readers, I wish y’all a happy Passover. To all my Gentile readers, I wish y’all a deliverance from slavery under the yoke of the strange god of Diversity. May the blessings of peoplehood, liberty, strength and courage be upon you!

We can’t know for certain, but the Hebrews in Egypt were probably an ill-defined people. Some were probably assimilated into Egyptian culture, speaking the Egyptian language and worshiping Egyptian gods. They spoke like Egyptians, married Egyptians, dressed like Egyptians – and probably even walked like Egyptians.

But persecution forced them to make a choice: Are they truly Egyptians, or are they Hebrews? This choice solidified the formation of my own nation, the Jews. In the same way, intensifying persecution against whites is forcing many people to ask themselves about their identity. Are they deracinated consumer units, or are they members of a great and upcoming White-American nation? Events in their lives sometimes make that choice an easier one – for example, when non-whites attack them, or when self-hating whites disparage them and deny them benefits or rights.

White Americans don’t have the benefit of a Moses, and nobody’s going to split the sea for them – but each white person can be his own Moses. Deep inside each and every one of us is a Moses; he simply needs to be set free.

Set your Moses free.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Shades of Lies from Corporate Media

Posted on March 25, 2021 by jewamongyou

A 12 year old white boy was attacked, at a McDonald’s, by a middle-aged black man who yelled anti-white slurs. From The Gateway Pundit:

A black man stabbed a white 12-year-old boy at McDonald’s in Pittsburgh in what appears to be a clear anti-white hate crime.

The child is in stable condition after being stabbed by Charles Edward Turner, 51, on Sunday.

The child was with his family when the man tackled the boy and stabbed him in the neck with a box cutter.

“According to police, the boy was stabbed in the neck inside the McDonald’s at Liberty Avenue and Stanwix Street near Market Square around 2 p.m. Officers Ross Small, Harry Siwik and Steve Harris sustained injuries during the arrest. David Lewandowski and Henry Seifried, employees at McDonalds’s, also were injured,” the Pittsburgh Post Gazette reports. “According to the criminal complaint, Mr. Turner fought with officers as they tried to arrest him. The complaint alleges that Mr. Turner used racial slurs against officers, patrons and employees during his arrest and bit one of the witnesses.”

According to local television reports, Turner was muttering “white devils” and other anti-white slurs at the crime scene, though the Post Gazette opted not to include the details about the “racial slurs” he was using.

Let’s see how other “news” outlets reported the incident.

The local Pittsburgh site, WPXI, mentions the “racial slurs” only in paragraph 10, and toward the end of the embedded video:

After the incident, Turner was found outside pacing back-and-forth and yelling racial slurs, before going back into the restaurant. The criminal complaint says family members tried to question Turner, who told them “he only wanted to finish his coffee and then leave the restaurant.”

Nowhere in the article is there any mention of an anti-white sentiment, nor are we told what race the victim is; for all we know, he could be Asian or mestizo.

CBS Pittsburgh reported the story, and embedded a video, which includes various interviews. Neither the article, nor the video make any mention of “racial slurs” or anti-white sentiment.

Kiro7, from Seattle, mentioned nothing about “racial slurs” in the accompanying video, and only on paragraph 6 does the article mention “racial slurs,” omitting the fact that they were specifically anti-white slurs:

A criminal complaint states that there is no indication that the suspect knew the victim and that Turner was seen pacing outside following the incident – yelling racial slurs – before re-entering the restaurant.

CNN/NBC, sanitized the racial angle from the story entirely. From beginning to end, there is no mention of any racial motive or slurs.

Local12, (Cincinnati Refined), makes no mention of “racial slurs” or anti-white animus.

Fox News mentions “racial slurs” in the headline, and elaborates on the racial angle in the first two paragraphs.

This pretty much covers the first page of Google results for “Man Stabs 12-Year-Old Boy.” It’s true that Fox does not provide reliable news, but it’s the only corporate media company that doesn’t try to hide the facts when white people are attacked by non-whites.

Will the culprit be charged with a hate-crime? It will be interesting to see.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Use of Lethal Force Against BLM Mobs

Posted on March 24, 2021 by jewamongyou

Yesterday, a BLM mob attacked a grocery store in Rochester, New York, and prevented about 100 people from leaving. From The Daily Wire:

Black Lives Matter protesters in Rochester, New York, mobbed a Wegmans grocery store on Tuesday afternoon, trapping an estimated 100 customers inside.

Video shows protesters chanting “Black Lives Matter” and referring to Daniel Prude, a black man who died about a week after a viral encounter with the Rochester Police Department. The state’s Democratic Attorney General announced last month that a grand jury will not seek charges against officers involved in the incident.

Before heading to the grocery store, protesters yelled, “We have a long walk today, we’re shutting s*** down,” according to 13WHAM-TV reporter Michael Schwartz…

The store was mobbed and forced to close, as an estimated 100 customers remained locked inside…

Schwartz reported, “The group has set up here at East Ave. Wegmans. Cars following have carried these supplies. Last time I saw a tent setup was at Occupy City Hall. Shoppers cannot leave.”

The article includes some video clips, and points out that the police did not intervene.

I’m not an attorney, so I can’t give legal advice, but it seems to me that a case can be made that lethal force might be justified in such situations. What BLM did to the shoppers appears to be “unlawful restraint” or “abduction.” From the New York penal code, article 135:

S 135.00 Unlawful imprisonment, kidnapping and custodial interference; definitions of terms.

The following definitions are applicable to this article:

1. “Restrain” means to restrict a person`s movements intentionally and unlawfully in such manner as to interfere substantially with his liberty by moving him from one place to another, or by confining him either in the place where the restriction commences or in a place to which he has been moved, without consent and with knowledge that the restriction is unlawful. A person is so moved or confined “without consent” when such is accomplished by (a) physical force, intimidation or deception, or (b) any means whatever, including acquiescence of the victim, if he is a child less than sixteen years old or an incompetent person and the parent, guardian or other person or institution having lawful control or custody of him has not acquiesced in the movement or confinement.

2. “Abduct” means to restrain a person with intent to prevent his liberation by either (a) secreting or holding him in a place where he is not likely to be found, or (b) using or threatening to use deadly physical force.

New York penal code, article 35 tells us when it’s justifiable to use physical force:

S 35.15 Justification; use of physical force in defense of a person.

1. A person may, subject to the provisions of subdivision two, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to defend himself, herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by such other person…

None of the exceptions listed thereafter apply to this situation. Also, any reasonable person would recognize that a raging mob, such as we see in the videos, does pose a risk of “imminent use of unlawful physical force.”

It appears to me, as a non-attorney, that people are legally allowed to use physical force to free themselves from unlawful abduction in the State of New York. As for the courts upholding such a right, that’s something we would expect in a First World country – and I don’t think the US qualifies as such any longer.

Posted in crime and violence, government/corporate discrimination against whites, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Will Cigna Be Held Accountable?

Posted on March 23, 2021 by jewamongyou

It’s now the norm, rather than the exception, for corporations to discriminate against white men. It’s a matter of policy for them, as they follow the lead of the Biden administration, and years of precedence. The latest to be exposed for blatant anti-white discrimination is Cigna.

From The Daily Wire:

Cigna, one of the nation’s largest health insurance providers, has allegedly told employees not to hire white men as part of the company’s broader critical race theory campaign. 

According to an internal chat log obtained by the Washington Examiner, a hiring manager at Cigna dismissed a white candidate because he did not fulfill the company’s diversity standards. In the chat, an employee suggested the company interview a man with extensive experience for an open position. The hiring manager allegedly told the employee that the man could not be interviewed because he is white. 

In a separate chat log, a hiring manager dismissed another candidate who he assumed to be white. The candidate was a racial minority. After learning of the candidate’s accurate skin color — and little else — the hiring manager allegedly reversed course and hired the candidate. 

Employees were also forced to undergo training wherein they were taught that white people have “white privilege,” straight men have “gender privilege,” and Christians have “religious privilege.” The company defines religious privilege as “a set of advantages that benefits believers of a certain religion but not people who practice other religions or no religions at all.”

Apparently, being denied a job or promotion now counts as a “privilege,” and it’s a privilege that white people have had for decades.

It’s possible that a successful lawsuit could come from this, but looking into the future, I see less and less recourse for anti-white discrimination. After several years of Harris/Biden, the courts will be even more packed with activist judges. Also, how can we expect the government to protect the rights of white people when it’s at the forefront in discriminating against us?

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Prisoner of Conscience: Robert Hoogland

Posted on March 21, 2021 by jewamongyou

The “Tolerant Left” is showing its true colors in Canada, as a father tries to protect his daughter from state-sponsored child abuse. I recommend reading this article by The Post Millennial. It describes how Mr. Hoogland has sacrificed his very freedom to protect his daughter from possible life-long harm. It also describes the soulless transition industry, whose goal seems to be destroying the well-being of countless children in the name of profit. Shame on them. Here are some excerpts:

There is a man in Canada who can only be alluded to as He Who Shall Not Be Named: Robert Hoogland. For the sake of natural justice, it is important to speak this man’s name. He is now the Canadian state’s prisoner of conscience.

The warrant was issued by a judge for the arrest of a father after calling his biological female child his “daughter,” and referring to her with the pronouns “she” and “her.” Hoogland was found to be in contempt of court.

Hoogland is a father to a gender non-conforming biological female 16-year-old who identifies as transgender and prefers the use of male pronouns. Hoogland has repeatedly called this person his daughter, though the court has forbade it. The transition has been underway for more than two years.

According to the article, the child had experienced various mental health issues from about the age of 13.

When Hoogland accompanied his child to a consultation with Wong, the psychologist advised the pubescent child to take testosterone. Wong referred the child to the endocrinology unit at the local hospital. Meanwhile, Hoogland was looking for mental health solutions to help the child without drugs.

On the child’s first visits to the hospital, a treatment plan was put into action. Both the child, and her mother—Hoogland’s ex-wife—signed a consent form which explicitly stated that the “treatment” was experimental, meaning that the endocrinologists recommending the treatment didn’t know the long-term health impact.

A gender identity activist lawyer, Barbara Findley, represented the child in court. Justice Boden decided that the child’s best interests lay in destroying her long-term health to make her body appear more like that of a male.

The article claims that an estimated 85 percent of children… desist in their belief that they are the opposite sex once puberty ends. This claim is disputed, and hard statistics don’t seem to exist. An NBC article from 2019 cites several studies. At the lower end, we’re told that about 2 percent of participants expressed regret after undergoing gender-affirming surgery.

Is it acceptable to perform a procedure upon a child when there’s a 2% risk that it will lead to irreversible damage? I don’t think so. In my opinion, only life/limb threatening emergencies should justify the performance of such a procedure.

In a sane world, a troubled child should be offered counseling. In severe cases, mild medication should be prescribed. Only when she has fully reached adulthood, some time in her twenties, should hormone replacement, or surgery, even be considered. At that point, she can make her own decisions.

What about Mr. Hoogland’s freedom of speech? How can we describe a regime that jails people for “misgendering” as anything other than a tyranny? I hope China throws this case back in Canada’s face, when the latter accuses China of “human-rights abuses.” Nice going Canada; you have just moved into a glass house.

I do wish Mr. Hoogland the best, and I hope his daughter survives this ordeal. Whatever the outcome, Mr. Hoogland can take comfort in the fact that he’s doing the best he can to protect his daughter against an evil state apparatus.

Posted in Aspergers and health, human sexuality and morality | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment