No 1950s art of Mohammed

I’d rather post a quickie than leave y’all wondering if I’ve disappeared again. The truth is that my life is so hectic, and busy, right now, that free time (in front of my computer) is a rare commodity.

I could post from my cellular phone, but then the posts would be riddled with typos. Can’t have that!

Anyway, I was in downtown Portland recently, and a guy was selling unusual postcards. Many of them featured Jesus doing preposterous things, such as dropping bombs on poor, third-world, people, engaging in other forms of carnage, riding dinosaurs etc. I thought they were interesting.

jesus art

I said, “I see you’re a great fan of Jesus. Do you have anything with Mohammed?” He replied, “There is no 1950s vintage art of Mohammed. If there were, then I would use it.” He repeated this to make sure I knew that he would have no problem mocking Mohammed at his business.

I wonder if doing so would make him a fool.

Posted in freedom of speech issues, Muslims, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

CNN executives murder Jewish woman in San Diego

From NBCSan Diego:

A man with a rifle entered Chabad of Poway on Rancho Bernardo Road, west of Interstate 15 at 11:23 a.m. and opened fire on the people inside, law enforcement officials said.

“We didn’t hear him screaming or saying anything. He was just focused to kill. You saw the hate and the murder in his eyes,” Danny Almong, a witness, told NBC 7. “He had a vest and he had clips in the vest. He was ready. He was ready. He came in to kill.”

The suspect John T. Earnest, 19, graduate of Mount Miguel High School and student at Cal State San Marcos. Earnest does not have a criminal history and has no apparent connection with white supremacist groups, according to San Diego County Sheriff Bill Gore.

Is John Earnest a CNN executive? Not exactly, but he is a product of CNN (and other fake news networks) policies. He is a product of Facebook policies, and of Quora policies.

While these companies are all too eager to discuss the shortcomings of whites, real or perceived, they do not allow any criticism of non-white groups or of Jews.

As a result, they’ve surrendered any such discussions to groups such as Stormfront and Vanguard Network.

While there’s some valid criticism to be found on those forums, much of it speaks of Jews as if we’re a monolithic entity. Much of it encourages blind hatred against people based solely on their ethnic background.

If we had a respectable mainstream media, which was willing to openly discuss issues affecting whites, including the open hostility so many of my co-ethnics have toward whites, then perhaps Mr. Earnest would have found more constructive venues for his frustrations. Perhaps he would have even known that Chabad (same as “Lubavitch”) members tend to be politically conservative; they’re not anti-white generally speaking – though some of their dogma is anti-goy. I think most white people would find Chabadnicks to be excellent neighbors.

What has Mr. Earnest accomplished through this horrific deed?

  1. He has given more ammunition to the Establishment Left (CNN and their ilk) for their war against whites.
  2. He might have created animosity against whites, among Jews, where there was none before.
  3. He has taken an innocent life, and affected the lives of other negatively.
  4. He has destroyed his own life.
  5. He has given yet more ammunition to the anti-gun forces – except that this happened in California, where, theoretically, it “couldn’t” have happened.
  6. He has added a level of fear among a harmless demographic, which does not deserve to live in fear.

I think now would be a good time for CNN executives, and editors, to take a good look in the mirror, and rethink their repressive policies.

Posted in crime and violence, freedom of speech issues, guns and gun-control, Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Permanently banned from Quora

Good news! I’ve been permanently banned from Quora, or so it appears. Getting banned for speaking up against injustice is a badge of honor.

On a more sinister note, this illustrates how the Establishment Left, through its intolerance, is promoting extremism and violence.

I’m old enough, and mature enough in my views, that I’m not going to go off the deep end and shoot up a mosque. But the points that I tried to bring up at the big-box social media sites are glaringly obvious to many millions of people. If these points can’t be discussed openly, if bringing them up leads to ostracism or worse, then some people will find “alternative methods” to communicate their displeasure. David Wood explains it very eloquently:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pawij9XrZjQ&w=560&h=315]

David Wood’s points about Islam apply equally to racial/ethnic dispossession. When people are unable to have civil, and open, discussions about these issues, “alternative methods” will be utilized.

Aside from this issue, the practice of banning those with opposing views leads to the creation of echo chambers. Quora, Facebook and Twitter are gradually becoming leftist echo chambers, where opinions are inexorably nudged ever more to the left.

When denizens of these echo chambers denigrate more open platforms, such as Gab, as nests of neo-Nazism, they have nobody to blame but themselves. Those on the right are also human, and when left with no alternative but to interact with their own ilk, will also grow more extremist over time. The difference is that leftists have options; they’re not being forced into ghettos. In contrast, conservatives (increasingly) are.

In a previous post, my friend “Human Stupidity” warns me:

We are really concerned. All reasonable race realists and nationalists get defunded, kicked out of jobs, banks, social media. I already warned you, you should run your blog on jewamongyou.com so you can self host

I think he’s right; sooner or later, I’ll probably get removed from WordPress too. I have backed up all my previous posts, and would be able to upload them to a WordPress.org website. Unfortunately, I lack the expertise to do so. Also, I’m not sure if the comments would be preserved. I’m open to ideas.

Posted in freedom of speech issues, government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Does obesity serve the Progressive agenda?

Here are two graphs for your inspection. The first one is from USNews:

obesity rates

The second is from the Pew Research Council:

intermarriage rates

While “intermarriage” does not exclusively refer to black/white couples, there’s no reason to doubt that such couples adhere to the same trend.

My hypothesis is that as white women grow more obese, and their value in the dating market decreases as a result, they are more receptive to advances by black men – who tend to be more forgiving in matters of BMI. White men, being less forgiving, seek refuge in Asian women, who tend to be more svelte.

Does racial intermarriage fit the Progressive agenda? Obviously so. Does this mean there is an “Obesity conspiracy?” Alex Jones, where are you when we need you?

Posted in miscegenation | Tagged | 4 Comments

Circumventing the First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Fortunately, later courts have ruled that freedom of speech must be upheld by ALL levels of government, and not just by Congress. Even if the courts had not so ruled, many of us believe that this is a natural right, not to be infringed by any level of government.

This is why it irks me to read about two Virginia police officers being dismissed for merely being SUSPECTED of having views that are considered offensive in the eyes of the Establishment Left:

Anti-Fascists of the Seven Hills, which said it was based in Richmond, Va., wrote online in February that Sergeant [Robert A. Stamm of the Virginia Division of Capitol Police] Stamm {snip} was linked to the Asatru Folk Assembly, which the Southern Poverty Law Center has described as an extremist group that invokes pre-Christian Nordic spirituality…

In the second case, Daniel Morley, a school resource officer with the Chesterfield County Police Department, was fired Thursday following an investigation into allegations that he was affiliated with the group Identity Evropa, also known as the American Identity Movement. Members of that group helped plan the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va., according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Antifa Seven Hills had identified Mr. Morley as a “pledge coordinator” for the group, which recruits on college campuses and elsewhere. {snip}

Mr. Morley was suspended in March while the department investigated the claims. Col. Jeffrey S. Katz, the police chief, wrote on social media on Thursday that investigators had authenticated the online postings and activities.

“The views espoused by and attributed to Mr. Morley violate county and departmental policy and our organizational values; his continued employment is antithetical to the expectations of our personnel and those we serve,” he wrote.

Is there any instance of “free speech” that cannot be infringed by invoking “organizational values?” What if the police department were located in the Bible Belt, and its “organizational values” required all officers to be Christian? What’s offensive to some may not be offensive to others. Considerations such as “community values” should only come into play, regarding government jobs, if their violation also happens to be a violation of the law. The law should be the only standard by which officers are judged – and if we are going to judge them based on whether we consider their views “moral” or not, then we need to devise a moral code that’s agreeable to everyone. The SPLC should not be the body that determines such things.

WR the Realist commented (at Amren) that

Identity Europa, now American Identity Movement, is one of the most moderate of the pro-white groups. You’ll be kicked out for having any sort of Nazi or fascist tattoos, insignia, or signs.

I think this is correct. I’m fairly certain that they do not allow Jews to join their organization (I did apply once), but this does not make them a “hate group.” The Congressional Black Caucus doesn’t allow whites to be members… not that I’m comparing the two organizations; I’m simply pointing out that even the Establishment Left recognizes freedom of association when it suits their purposes.

Similarly, the Federal government has been denying visas to people based purely on ideology. For example:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWarECxIcaU?controls=0&w=560&h=315]

I had more to write on this topic, but family matters have left me with precious little time these days. I may edit this post later.

Posted in freedom of speech issues | 5 Comments

What if his name is Muhammad?

I have a question regarding the tragic burning of the Notre Dame Cathedral.

Suppose it’s concluded that the fire was an accident. Will the authorities release the names of the construction workers in question? Definitely not, and for obvious reasons. But I’d like to know what proportion of those workers are of Muslim background, and do average French citizens believe it wise to entrust priceless national treasures to people who do not value those treasures to the same extent that native French do.

What if it turns out that the worker, who caused the fire, is named Muhammad? Do we believe him that it was an accident? Would Muslims trust non-Muslims to work on their sacred architecture? If one of their priceless mosques were accidentally burned down by a Christian, wouldn’t there be riots?

So it turns out I had more than one question. I’d like some answers.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in immigration/ Hispanics, Muslims | 7 Comments

Back from the dead

Hi dear readers,

Am I back from the dead? Well… actually, I wasn’t really “dead.” Rather, I was spending my (very NOT-copious) free time expressing my views on Quora. I felt that there was a much wider audience for my heresies there than here. Indeed, my comments/answers got a lot of views, and I like to think that they swayed some people toward the truth.

Not surprisingly, I got banned. Not a permanent ban; just a 2-week ban. It’s just as well; I needed a rest from that forum anyway. After a while, it starts to become like work. I’ve got enough actual work as it is! That’s right, I’m still not retired.

What got me banned was too many “Be Nice, Be Respectful (BNBR)” violations. Not that I was ACTUALLY not nice, or not respectful. But one can run afoul of this rule by:

  1. Answering questions about race and ethnicity honestly.
  2. Referring to whites as a “white community.”
  3. Linking to Amren.com.
  4. Citing FBI crime statistics.
  5. Berating white/non-Muslim people for not standing up for themselves in the face of blatant discrimination.

It’s the last one that was the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back for me.

When my 2 weeks is up, I do plan on continuing to post there, but I’ll be very careful what I write, and link to this blog to more honestly complete my thoughts. We’ll see how that goes.

Aside from that, I look forward to meeting some of y’all at the upcoming Amren conference!

Posted in freedom of speech issues, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 5 Comments

Please help persecuted South African Whites! – URGENT!

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

Another gem from Quora

I’ll just be lazy and copy and paste:

 

This is our future, unless we can put a stop to the population-replacement policies now in place.

Posted in Africa and blacks | 14 Comments

Germany’s shameful concern about Jews

A recent article from The Atlantic asks: Can Germany Protect its Jews?

For understandable reasons, Europeans are much more comfortable condemning the familiar anti-Semitism of the far right than the sort expressed by migrants entering Europe as the victims of war and economic deprivation. Nowhere is this issue more fraught than in Germany.

To a degree unmatched by any other nation, Germany has confronted its horrific past with commendable honesty. After World War II, Germany assumed responsibility for its crimes and obliged itself both to protect Jewish life and to offer sanctuary to those escaping violent conflict and political persecution. But the recent intake of so many migrants from places where anti-Semitism is rife has produced an uncomfortable tension between these two commitments.

That tension was laid bare recently when a video shot on a Berlin street went viral. It depicted a young man wearing a kippa, or Jewish skullcap, being assaulted by a Syrian asylum-seeker. German Chancellor Angela Merkel condemned the incident as a “disgrace.” This week, thousands of Germans of different faith groups donned kippa in several cities and marched in solidarity with the Jewish community.  Some Muslim women wore kippotover their hijabs. It was an admirable display. But if Germany—the country leading the rest of Europe—is serious about addressing anti-Semitism, it will need to make the safety of its Jewish communities a higher priority when considering future migrant inflows.

For the plain fact is that most of the migrants who have come (and continue to come) to Europe hail from Muslim-majority countries that long ago expelled their once-vibrant Jewish populations, where anti-Semitism figures prominently in state propaganda, and where belief in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories is widespread. To take just one obvious incongruity between Germany and the migrants it is accepting: Holocaust denial, a crime punishable by prison in Germany, is pervasive across the Muslim and Arab Middle East.

Why is this shameful? Because there seems to be no concern, whatsoever, for non-Jewish Germans, who have suffered far worse than being hit by a belt.

Given the lack of concern, by the German government, for its own citizens, I would be ashamed if I were a German Jew. The concern shown for me would be akin to accepting a meal from a starving homeless person. Take care of yourself, and your own, first. Is it beneath Merkel’s dignity to describe the rape of German women, by savages, as a “disgrace?” The article goes on:

The conundrum facing Germany is no better represented than in the person of Merkel herself. The most pro-Israel chancellor in German history and the one most sensitive to Jewish concerns, Merkel’s attitude to Jewry is uncomplicated by the resentments and historical hang-ups possessed by some of her predecessors. In a 2008 speech to the Israeli Knesset, Merkel used unprecedented language to describe her country’s responsibility for Israeli security, stating that it constituted a German staatsraïson, or “reason of state.” Earlier this month, her government appointed a commissioner to fight anti-Semitism.

If only she showed half as much concern for her own people. As far as I’m concerned, she can take her pro-Israel sentiments and place them somewhere under her ugly fat flaps.

As the horror of what Merkel, and her allies, have wrought upon Europe becomes more evident, Native Europeans will increasingly despise her. European Jews should then be asking themselves, “is this the sort of ally we want?” If Merkel is sincerely concerned about neo-Nazis attacking Jews, then the worst thing she could do is embrace us while simultaneously demonstrating her utter disdain for Europe’s beleaguered natives.

I’d say a good 30%-40% of the negative feelings American whites have against blacks is due to the adoration lavished upon blacks by the same elites who would prefer that whites cease to exist entirely. A similar dynamic is probably at work in Europe regarding its hostile elites and the Jews. My enemy’s friend is also my enemy.

But this is secondary to me. What really disturbs me is the callous disregard for the welfare of non-Jewish Germans. It’s as if they’re not even worthy of mention.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, immigration/ Hispanics, Jewish stuff and Israel | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments