A "victory" for law-enforcement?

Posted on February 26, 2012 by jewamongyou

Watching the video at the top of this news story, we are given the impression that law-enforcement triangulation of the victim’s cell phone led to a victory.  The woman, whose one-week-old baby was beside her, was raped by a feral porch monkey.  She was…

… beaten, choked, raped, sodomized and cut by Holmes as the infant slept nearby.

Had the victim been armed, and dispatched the intruder, that would have been more of a victory.  We would then have been reading about a happy ending to this story.  As it stands, this is not a happy ending – though we can hope for some sort of justice to be done.  And yes, it could have been worse, but it certainly could have been better too.  Here is the suspect:
There is little doubt that the victim is white.  Naturally, there are some (in the comments) who have no problem with ongoing racial attacks against whites; they get up in arms, however, when such crimes are described within this context.  In their twisted minds, it is “racist” to object to interracial crime, but not racist to actually commit them – as long as the victims are white, of course.
Tax money should not be used to buy cell-phones for “at-risk-youth”.  If anything, it should be used to buy guns for white women so that they can protect themselves from animals such as the one pictured above.
Posted in crime and violence | 14 Comments

My beef with the Statesman Journal

Posted on February 26, 2012 by jewamongyou

We read in the Statesman Journal:

VENETA — Four cows were killed in separate crashes after high winds blew open a pasture gate and the cows wandered into a highway.
No one was injured in the crashes on Friday night near Veneta.

“No one was injured?”  Don’t the lives of those escaped hamburgers count for anything?

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Digging myself deeper

Posted on February 24, 2012 by jewamongyou

I knew the responses to my previous post would provide fodder for further thoughts.  And though not all thoughts are worthy of expressing, there is one underlying idea that should be pointed out here.
Many of us, in the world of H.B.D. (human bio-diversity), consider ourselves different from the rest of the world. We look at the ignorant masses and say, “See how closed-minded they are!  They cannot distinguish between what they consider to be self-evident truth (racial equalitarianism) and blind faith.”
Reluctant Apostate was right when he wrote:

Obviously the main motivation for the necrophilia law is the ick factor, but in this case, I think the reflex points in the right direction.

Even if all the risks, and moral complications, involved with necrophilia were to be eliminated, most people would still want it illegal.  It’s probably true, as Latte Island says, that “a marker for people who will do bad things to living people without their consent.”  When Ed wrote:

With all due respect, I can’t agree with this. You have taken a libertarian principle, and quite logically taken it *way* past what I could support.
Libertarian logic leading to drug legalization?…..OK, I can follow that.
Libertarian logic leading to necrophilia legalization? …..Nope, no way, full stop, I’m getting off this train, and tearing up the rail road tracks.

I’m certain he was speaking for the vast majority of my readers; most were too polite to write their true feelings on the matter.  The word for what Ed feels is “revulsion”.  There are human proclivities we can explain by way of logic.  If we keep asking questions, like the child who persistently asks “why?”, then we reach a point where logic becomes useless.  This is because, ultimately, nothing really matters.  If our entire planet gets swallowed up by a black hole, it would make no difference for any alien life forms left behind.  Our primal instincts are not subject to logic.
Unfortunately, for most of the people around us, a revulsion toward “racism” might as well be a primal instinct.  They feel the same way about “racism” as we feel toward necrophilia.  This is why it is rarely productive to debate with such people.  Even if we show them that what they call “racism” is necessary and good, their primal revulsion remains.  Obviously, necrophilia is never “necessary” or “good” – at least when it comes to any sort of benefit to society.  But the reptilian brain makes no such distinction.  Some things are disgusting at the emotional level, though we may bolster our revulsion with fortifications of logic.
As for my previous post, it’s something I wanted to write.  I knew it would upset a lot of people – and that raised the question: Am I writing this blog so that people can smile and agree with what I’m saying, or am I writing it to encourage people (including myself) to think in new directions and ask questions?  I knew the answer, and that’s why I went ahead and published the post.  I hope that even those who vehemently disagreed with what I wrote got something out of it.  It sounds like Ed did.  Even if my post caused him to reject libertarianism, at least he feels his opinions are more developed because of it.  It’s better to reject libertarianism because of well-thought-out arguments than to accept it based on fuzzy notions and fantasies.

Posted in libertarian thought | 30 Comments

A dispassionate look at necrophilia

Posted on February 23, 2012 by jewamongyou

Under the innocent-looking heading “Sunday wrap-up”, countenance wrote:

Aw, hell no.  What next?  Are they going to say that dead people won’t be allowed to vote?

How many unsuspecting people innocently clicked on that link?  I clicked on it and now I’m psychologically scarred forever… oh wait, I was rather “eccentric” even before that; never mind.  Anyway, here’s an excerpt:

Prohibiting sex with a dead body corrects an obvious omission in the law, Beiser said.
If the measure passes, sex with a corpse would be a Class 2 felony, with punishment ranging from probation to seven years in prison. Unauthorized removal of a corpse would be a Class 4 felony, with a penalty ranging from probation to three years.

As a libertarian, I must ask myself, “Where is the victim when it comes to necrophilia?”  By and large, the comments contain some good points.  For example:

captain hero  said: Will this outlaw sex with dead animals? Phone/Web Cam sex with the dead? What if a person has a signed, notarized consent form permitting their partner to have sex with them post-mortem?
jimharris said: Spending time on legislation to stop sex with the dead…(and you wonder why the state is going bankrupt..).
Dick-Butcher said: They didn’t take this far enough because they made one-felony-fit-all for the offense. They should divide this into more categories such as hate-necrophila where the prosecutor alleges the sex is a hate crime because the corpse was of a different race or religion than the accused, or child-necrophilia if the corpse is under age 18, or patriot act-necrophilia where the accused is Muslim or cyberstalking-necrophiia if the act is recorded and placed on the internet. After all, you can never have too many laws on the books.

All good points.  The ancient Jewish sages once said “A person’s will is his honor”.  In other words, what is considered dishonorable for you may be perfectly honorable for somebody else; it depends on the opinion of the person in question.  As for me, if somebody decides to have sex with my body after I’m dead, I really don’t care.  As a matter of fact, I might consent when I’m still alive.  Consider what happens to your body after death: It rots in the ground, maggots and worms eat away at it, the skin peals away, the organs shrivel… well, you get the idea – and you’re going to worry about somebody messing around with it for a few minutes?  What about the embalming process?  Most Orthodox Jews do not have their loved ones embalmed; they consider it dishonorable.  I’m pretty sure some Muslims feel the same way.  It all depends on your priorities and sensitivities.  There is no “one size fits all” and if I am able to posthumously donate my organs, then I certainly have the right to grant legal immunity to anybody who has sex with my corpse.  If the State prosecutes anyway, then it is dishonoring me.
What if somebody used the body of one of my loved ones after her death?  Honestly, I would not want to know about it.  As long as I don’t know, no harm has been done.  As far as I’m concerned, the idiot who walks up to me and tells me is the real criminal.  This would be one of the rare cases where it really might be justified to “kill the messenger”.  Some things are best left unknown.
Does “society” as a whole suffer as a result of lewd acts upon the dead?  This might be the case where such acts are common and known.  But if only the perpetrator knows about it, then it is difficult to see what harm has been done.  If I were to stumble upon somebody engaging in such an act, then I would ask myself which course of action would be best for the family.  Typically, the answer would be: Don’t say a word about it.  If the survivors found out, it would only cause them untold, and needless, anguish.  Aren’t they suffering enough already?  I would also consider how much money would be wasted, by the government, in prosecuting the perpetrator.  Many thousands of dollars of tax-payer money would go down the drain.  I might consider hitting him over the head with his own shovel, but his embarrassment at having been caught might be punishment enough.
What about diseases?  I might be wrong, but it seems to me there would be health-risks involved with necrophilia.  Bizarre diseases, and bugs, might be passed on to the perpetrator’s living sex partners.  This is true – but it is also true that other sexual practices, and extramarital affairs, put spouses and girlfriends at risk.  Should they all be made felonies?  We need only look at certain Islamic nations to get an idea of what sort of society we would live in if such a mentality were taken to its logical conclusion.  I, for one, would not want to live in such a society; I’d rather endure the occasional perverted oddball than give the government those extra powers.  This is one of the prices we pay for freedom.  Some people will take their freedom and do strange, even disgusting, things.

Posted in libertarian thought | 10 Comments

Some decent satire on racism

Posted on February 22, 2012 by jewamongyou

I came across this video by chance and thought the guy was fairly funny.  So y’all deserve to enjoy it too. Click here to watch it.

Posted in book/movie/video reviews and links | 3 Comments

Girl scout cookies

Posted on February 21, 2012 by jewamongyou

As I was leaving the grocery store yesterday, I was confronted with a mother and her two little girls.  They had set up a table to sell their girl scout cookies.  Well… I do have a soft spot for little girls, especially when they’re looking at me with the cutest look they can conjure up – which says “please buy some of my cookies”.
There is little doubt that, if I were to do some research, I’d discover that the Girl Scouts is a bastion of evil anti-whiteness.  That they do everything in their power to attract “girls of color” while neglecting white girls.  However, the girls in front of me were clearly white.  Looking over their cookies, almost all of them featured “people of color”.  Some had blacks, others had Asians or mestizos.  I doubt either the girls, or their mom, were even conscious of the fact that they were being marginalized.
I picked out the one box that featured a white girl.  Ironically, those cookies are called “Samoas”.

As I picked up the box, I told the girl nearest me, “I’ll take this one; it shows a girl who looks a bit like you!”
For the record, Samoan kids can be cute too.  Here’s a photo I took in Western Samoa that I’m particularly proud of:

… but they weren’t selling cookies.

Posted in activism | 18 Comments

The "Mantra"

Posted on February 20, 2012 by jewamongyou

Most of you have seen it.  It goes like this:

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
The “cult of the mantra” has taken some heat from pro-whites.  For example, a comment on Unamusement Park reads:

“The Mantra”?
Damn, I hate the “mantra”. It’s silly that people copy and paste it as a cheap substitute for actually participating in discussions. Then when people (leftists) challenge them, they don’t actually back it up. I went through this on the SPLC blog not long ago.

Though I agree with Anna (the commenter on Unamusement Park) that a lot of people use the Mantra in the way she describes, I would also prefer organic, grass-fed, beef over the mass-produced, corn-fed, variety we find in grocery stores.  However, if the latter were not available, a lot of people might go hungry.  And like most people, I enjoy wholesome, home-cooked meals when they’re available.  But sometimes pre-packaged food is all that’s available, or all I can afford, or all I have time for.
Not everybody has the time, or the ability, to engage in meaningful conversations about race online.  Worse still, many pro-whites believe they have the ability to make eloquent points about the ongoing genocide against their people – but make themselves look like fools when they try; their posts are so full of spelling/grammatical errors that they make people unsympathetic to our cause.
I think it’s good that people have the option of a pre-packaged version of a pro-white argument.  It’s better than silence, it’s better than making yourself look like an idiot, and it might make some people start to ask questions and think.
As for Anna’s point about not backing it up, denizens of leftist boards are not interested in meaningful debate anyway.  If you do try to support the Mantra with facts and statistics, they won’t read them – and you’ll probably just get banned.  Therefore, with leftists it’s better to use the “knock-out game” tactic.  Strike them by surprise and strike them hard.  Then run and go somewhere else rather than waste your time with them “debating”.  The Mantra is as good a tool for this as any other.  I would add, however, that it should be changed periodically; there probably shouldn’t be just one “Mantra”, but the concept is a good one.

Posted in politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 13 Comments

Dragon fruit: The best fruit in the world

Posted on February 19, 2012 by jewamongyou

A few years ago I was visiting Thailand, among other places, and I visited one of the outdoor marketplaces.  My intention was to find fruits that I had never tried, purchase some, bring them back to my hotel to consume them.  My expedition was fruitful.  At one end of the continuum was the durian fruit, which is barely even edible if not prepared right.  As a matter of fact, the smell is so bad that it is not unusual to see the following sign on hotel lobby walls:

I will spare you the details of how it looked, its consistency and flavor.  Locals would surely laugh if they saw me eating it raw and unprepared.  Don’t do it.
On the other end of the continuum was the almost too-good-to-be-true, dragon fruit.  Here’s what it looks like on the stand:

You can clearly see the look of envy on the other fruits

Imagine, if you will, a kiwi on steroids.  The dragon fruit is much larger than a kiwi, and it peels as easily as a banana.  There is no pit to worry about, and the seeds are small and greatly enhance its consistency.  The fresh ones I had in Thailand were mildly sweet and the flesh was somewhat firm and almost crunchy.  Eating it, for the first time, was so heavenly that I felt like I was in food nirvana.  Here’s what they look like on the inside (photo found online):

There is also a red-fleshed variety.  A coworker recently brought a dragon fruit to work for me.  I had previously told him about them and his local Winco grocery store had started carrying them.  He fell in love with them right away and bought a bunch for his family.  The ones he buys are inferior.  They are not fresh.  The flesh is not as firm as it should be, nor is it nearly as sweet as it should be.  One can see wrinkles forming on the outside.  Nevertheless, I thoroughly enjoyed it.  Even an inferior dragon fruit is superior to the vast majority of other fruits.  In fact, I’m thinking about starting a religion based on the dragon fruit.  Of course, I would be the high priest.  I haven’t worked out the details yet.  Suggestions are welcome.
 

Posted in Uncategorized | 41 Comments

In praise of little girls

Posted on February 18, 2012 by jewamongyou

Somebody (I can’t remember who) sent me a news story about an Afghan man, and his mother, who murdered his wife for having daughters instead of sons:

Kunduz, Afghanistan (CNN) — Police in the northern Afghanistan province of Kunduz are looking for a man they say strangled his wife after she bore him a third child that was not a son.
Sher Mohammed, 29, married his 22-year-old wife, Storay, four years ago, police said.
The couple had three daughters, the last of whom was born three months ago, said Khanabad district police chief Sufi Habib.
After the youngest daughter was born, Mohammed blamed his wife for not being able to deliver a boy, Habib said.
“Finally on Saturday, the man, with the help of his mother, first beat the woman and then strangled her to death,” the police chief said.

I’ll admit that I, too, wanted a son.  My own wife had borne three daughters and all I wanted was one son.  But I never considered killing my wife over this; there were plenty of legitimate reasons to be angry with her – but that’s another story.
As it turned out, the very next child was a boy.  He was a handful, very cute and full of energy.  As he grew, we spent hours playing, wrestling, and having all sorts of fun.  But there’s a special kind of love a father has for his daughters.  If there’s anything more cute than a kitten, it’s a little girl – your own little girl.  The affection I felt, and still feel, toward my daughters was so great, it was almost painful.  I enjoyed playing with their hair, teasing them and carrying them on my shoulders.  While I’m happy they grew up, I would gladly pay to have those early years back – just for a while.  When I dream about my daughters, they are always still little girls.  They will always be my little girls, even when they’re in their 60’s.
As for the Afghan individual who murdered his wife (assuming he’s guilty), he should have been grateful to her, not angry.  She brought something beautiful into the world – something that he should have valued above all else.  May all the curses of Allah be upon him and upon his mother.

Posted in crime and violence | 23 Comments

Another black-on-white "non-hate crime"

Posted on February 17, 2012 by jewamongyou

Portland’s free weekly leftist rag, “Willamette Week” just published an article about the practice of “G-ing”.  It is a form of hazing practiced by high school students and, technically, it is a form of rape:

“G-ing” in the Spotlight

Grant High students speak out about the locker-room assaults.

For the past four weeks, Grant High School in Northeast Portland has been under a cloud of scrutiny and shame. Four of its students face criminal investigation for allegedly assaulting two of their junior varsity boys basketball teammates in the locker room.
One assault, police say, may have been sexual: A player is accused of trying to stick his finger in the anus of a boy held down by teammates—a practice known as G-ing…
On Jan. 12, four JV basketball players allegedly attacked two of their teammates in the Grant locker room after a game against Centennial, more than a month and a half into the season. Their coach, Jon Blumenauer, had left the locker room, and someone turned off the lights.
One player said teammates held him down while another tried to insert a finger in his anus. His compression shorts stopped them. The other player reported being beaten up by teammates as he tried to leave the locker room after the first attack.
G-ing is a widely known term among students and isn’t a play on the name of Grant High. Instead, it’s a mocking reference to stimulating a woman’s G spot.
People familiar with the case say the four boys involved in the attack are African-American; the two alleged victims are white. Three of the students involved in the attack were suspended and have returned to school; a fourth has been expelled for the school year. All four have been kicked off the JV basketball team.

I could not help but notice that the overall tone of the article, until the point where the race of the perpetrators and victims is mentioned, is ambiguous.  The author, Hannah Hoffman, can’t seem to figure out if the crime is a serious one or not.  However, from the moment the racial aspect is mentioned, the overall tone seems to change to one of “maybe it really isn’t such a big deal.”  Naturally, Hoffman needed to point out that…

Students told WW they don’t think the incident was prompted by race. Others say they feel sorry for the boys who got in trouble, believing they were caught up in locker-room clowning that got out of control.

All we know from this, assuming Willamette Week is not outright lying, is that at least two students (out of a student body of 1,577) said they don’t think the incident was prompted by race.  Did Willamette Week conduct a survey?  Did they hear other opinions – and then fail to report them?  Did they ask until they found the opinion they wanted?  We can only guess, but I’d be willing to bet that some students would disagree.
Regardless what the students may believe, we can add this incident to the long list of black-on-white crimes that were “not hate-crimes”.  I have not been able to find a single such incident, in the Portland area, where the perpetrators were white and the victims black.  If  there were to be such an incident, we can rest assured that one of the first things we would hear about it would be that “hate-crime charges are being considered.”
 

Posted in crime and violence, examples of propaganda | 9 Comments