Sex ratio and average I.Q.

The normal state of affairs, in human society, is for males to compete for females.  The fact that more boys than girls are born (in every society) serves to intensify this competition.  Though there is a tendency for excess boys to die off through war and rivalry, this only underscores the fact the the fittest males tend to be the ones who survive and reproduce.
When we look at world sex ratios, it becomes clear that low ratios (i.e. less of a predominance of boys over girls) are concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa.  When examining such tables, it is important to consider the overall size of a population along with age distribution.  For example, Granada only has 90,000 people and Lichtenstein only 34,000.  Furthermore, 12% of the latter’s population is over 65; there are always more females than males amongst the elderly.
In contrast, China is heavily skewed toward males.  My understanding is that this has been the case historically as well.  India, on the other hand has, historically, been more balanced.  Female infanticide was practiced mainly among the higher castes because higher caste females were not permitted to work outside the family.  This was not the case among the lower castes, where women were required to work just like the men.
Sex ratios in Europe are similar to those in sub-Saharan Africa.  It seems to me that the underlying causes are different.  Modern Europe has a low sex ratio because of modernization and gender equality.  Sub-Saharan Africa has a low sex ratio mainly because more girls are born to begin with.  It is known that Medieval Europe (or, at least parts of Europe) had a very high sex ratio, sometimes as high as 253 men for every 100 women.  Some have suggested female infanticide as a possible explanation.
When we look at these historical trends, scant as they are, and compare them to average I.Q.’s, a pattern emerges.  When men have easy access to women over long periods of time, the average I.Q. of that population would fall.  This does not bode well for modern Western society and it goes hand in hand with the backwardness of Africa.
What about American blacks?  Blacks in America do not live in an isolated reproductive community.  If they did, then it is likely that their average I.Q. would match that of sub-Saharan Africa (plus whatever European contribution they happen to have).  Currently there is an artificial premium on black males.  At the same time, countless non-black females are available to them – thus intensifying competition among black females for black males.   Hence there is practically no selective pressure, among American blacks, for higher I.Q. in finding mates.  On the contrary, there is selective pressure for lower I.Q. in reproducing; higher I.Q. blacks will tend to have less children, just like their white and Asian counterparts.
My prediction?  White I.Q.’s are likely to stagnate.  Chinese and Indian I.Q.’s will surge.  American black I.Q. will plummet.  Of course, India is unlikely to maintain its current anti-female practices for long; social unrest might force drastic changes before any I.Q.-boosting evolution can take place.  The same is true for China, except that China has maintained this pattern for centuries, so its higher I.Q. is already a fait accompli.
As for sub-Saharan Africa, things will only get worse.  As more intelligent African men migrate out of Africa, only the dullest will remain – and these remaining men will be like roosters in the hen house.  The only way to prevent such a scenario would be to rapidly make African societies more attractive for successful men.  This can only happen from within.  African leaders have their work cut out for them.

Posted in nurture vs. nature and I.Q., racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 12 Comments

Conspiracy theory and race-realism

I just finished watching “Conspiracy Theory” with Jesse Ventura.  It features, among others, Alex Jones of Prison Planet and I have always liked to think that things are not as bad as Jones says they are.  I also wonder, sometimes, how much of what he says falls under the category of “entertainment” rather than fact.
In “Conspiracy Theory” the claim is that secret government forces will unleash a pandemic upon the population.  When chaos ensues, martial law will be declared and millions of us will be locked up in concentration (FEMA) camps.  We, who understand HBD and recognize the dangers of ethnic diversity, appreciate that such “chaos” would probably take the form of societal fractures along ethnic lines.  Hence, divide and conquer would be an important tactic of this cabal.  If there is substance to the above conspiracy theory, then theorists such as Ventura and Jones would do well to understand how HBD and diversity fit into it; those doing the conspiring certainly do.
If there is a small cabal of immensely powerful people conspiring to seize control over the entire planet, I doubt that they are driven by ideological motivations.  I would not expect them to be “leftists” or to subscribe to any particular creed or religion – except insofar as they worship themselves.
The tactic of divide and conquer is more effective when the divisions, within the populace, are more or less equal.  This insures that the struggle can continue indefinitely, thus enabling those with real power to work behind the scenes.  From this perspective, we would not expect any such powerful cabal to work toward the total annihilation of the white race.  Instead, their goal would be to reduce whites to the status of just one of many ethnic groups vying for control.
If this is, indeed, the case then the powers that be may actually want some sort of white nationalist movement to take root; if whites simply shrivel up and die every time they’re confronted with a challenge to their hegemony, there would not be much of a struggle, would there?
In such a scenario, it would be up to whites to foil the evil plans of such a cabal.  Ventura does have one very conspicuous young black woman in his group.  Most likely, this is by design and not by chance; every other person involved with Ventura and Jones (at least those we can see) is white.  Given their racial ignorance, in all likelihood, they have put forth considerable efforts in outreach programs toward “people of color”.  Apparently, their efforts have amounted to naught – or very close to naught.
At one point, in the movie linked to above, Ventura accuses FEMA of targeting “African Americans” among others.  Likewise, in his paper “FEMA – The Secret Government“, Harry Martin even goes so far as to say:

The first targets in any FEMA emergency would be Hispanics and Blacks, the FEMA orders call for them to be rounded up and detained. Tax protesters, demonstrators against government military intervention outside U.S. borders, and people who maintain weapons in their homes are also targets. Operation Trojan Horse is a program designed to learn the identity of potential opponents to martial law. The program lures potential protesters into public forums, conducted by a “hero” of the people who advocates survival training. The list of names gathered at such meetings and rallies are computerized and then targeted in case of an emergency.

Obviously, things will not actually unfold like that, even if there is a kernel of truth to the theory as a whole.  Hispanics and blacks are certainly not the target of any sort of government conspiracy; they are the ones who most want big government.  They are the grunts who are being used as a club to destroy the last vestiges of America.  If there were any evidence of such a plan, the mainstream media would be all over it.  Instead, these are clearly attempts to recruit NAM’s (and the whites who worship them) to the anti-conspiracy cause.
In “Conspiracy Theory”, the story is told about a young woman from Missouri who was placed on a government watch list simply for campaigning for Ron Paul.  Harassment by organizations such as the SPLC and the ADL notwithstanding, I am not aware of any white nationalists (in America) being placed on government watch lists unless they advocate violence.  If the Federal Government wished to place bloggers like myself on such a list, it would be easy to do.  If they wished to place those who attend American Renaissance conferences on such a watch list, it would be a piece of cake.  As far as I can tell, the government is apathetic to our cause and they have no problem letting fringe leftist groups take potshots at us – but there does not seem to be any evidence of direct government intimidation (beyond refusing to defend us from aggression by others) at all.
Ask the average American which point of view is more extreme: a) support for Ron Paul or b) white nationalism.  The answer will almost always be “b”.  If the Federal Government is concerned about “extremists”, they would be targeting racialists more than Ron Paul supporters.  It would appear that the only “extremists” they are concerned about are the ones who might sabotage their agenda.  It might be that the existence of a certain number of white nationalists fits in quite well with their agenda.
Of course the truth is the truth.  So, the possibility that race realism or white-nationalism might go hand in hand with a secret plot to take over the world does not, in any way, discredit our point of view.  If, perchance, we get some sort of boost from the government, simple-minded people might view this as a blow to our credibility.  Other simple-minded people might point to this post and claim that I am trying to undermine the white cause.
If the future brings some sort of support from government, let us remember that they are not our friends.  Let us also remember that such support does nothing to discredit our cause.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements | 2 Comments

Extreme miscegenation

We are all familiar with the typical miscegenation scenario, where a big-boned white woman, who lacks self-esteem, gives in to the advances of a low I.Q. black man intent on acquiring a white trophy wife.  But the following case takes on a curious twist: this black man likes his woman to be as fat as possible – and she is happy to oblige him!  Thanks to Human Stupidity blog for linking to this video – which has since been removed by YouTube. Sorry.
I wonder how they flew her in to appear on the show.  Did they seat her in the middle of the isle so that the plane would not tip over to one side?  Or perhaps they brought her in using a special truck – with an “oversize load” sign on the back.
But in all seriousness, I know many white men are not bothered by such women betraying their own race.  Yet she did not start out this way; she has a mental illness and, if not for that illness, she could have made a fine wife for a white man.

Posted in miscegenation | 14 Comments

Murky reasoning by The Mercury

The Portland area has more than its share of leftist/wrongist rags.  Each of them does its part to “keep Portland weird”.  One of them, which is free for the taking all over town, is called “The Portland Mercury”.
The most recent edition compares two cases of what could loosely be called “terrorism” and poses a good question:

While the 19-year-old accused of plotting to bomb Pioneer Courthouse Square waits for his trial to begin, a second, much lower-profile politically motivated bombing case heard its closing arguments in an Oregon court this week.  The case of father and son Bruce and Joshua Turnidge bears several similarities with Mohamed Osman Mahamud’s… except that no one is using the word “terrorism.”
Bruce and Joshua Turnidge are facing aggravated murder charges for allegedly building a bomb and planting it at a bank in Woodburn, Oregon, in 2008, just after President Barack Obama’s election.
Unlike in Mohamud’s case, the Turnidges are accused of actually building and detonating a real bomb and taking real lives: The blast killed two police officers, took the leg of another, and injured a bank employee.  Like Mohamud’s case, the prosecutors are focusing on the Turnidges’ politics as a motivating factor behind the bombing, noting in the trial that Bruce Turnidge’s house was filled with weapons and that when FBI agents stopped by his house post-bombing, Turnidge called Obama a racial slur and said that “every ballot should come with a bullet.”
Family friends testified as state witnesses that Joshua expressed hatred of police and that Bruce had tried to organize an anti-government militia…

The article goes on to cite the SPLC (as if it is a reliable source) that right-wing home-grown terrorist groups are the fastest growing type of terrorist group.  It asks why it is that the Turnidges are being charged with aggravated murder rather than terrorism.  To its credit, The Mercury considers the fact that the officers killed were local and it is a matter of jurisdiction.  Of course, they could not hold themselves back from asking whether race might have played a role.  Mohamud is black (Somali) while the Turnidges are white:

“Could there be other reasons for the difference in treatment?” writes Parry, “Sure.  It could be race, it could be a sense that home-grown right-wing terrorism is not as serious or at least not part of a wider conspiracy.”

I’ll go with the original explanation: that local officers were killed and, therefore, it is a matter of jurisdiction.  As for home-grown, right-wing terrorism, I truly do not believe it is as serious as Islamic terrorism.  It should be obvious that the Turnidges (if guilty of the charges against them) are not representative of the “right wing”, but rather of ruthless indiscriminate killers.  This being said, if real home-grown, right-wing militias were to somehow get their wish and gain power, what we would end up with would be an earlier version of America.  However, if Islamic radicals were to somehow get their wish and gain power, America would be dead and gone.
That The Mercury seriously considers race as a possible explanation, only shows that they will never miss an opportunity to sell their racial paradigm.

Posted in examples of propaganda, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | 6 Comments

Ancient Ugaritic hymn

Salim Khalaf, in his site on Phoenicia, links to an Ugaritic hymn reconstructed by Dr. Anne Kilmer.  The hymn is 3,400 years old, so do not expect it to sound anything like the “greatest hits of 2010”.  Click here to listen to it.  This is a subject of great fascination for me.  It is probably the closest we shall ever get to anything resembling ancient Jewish music, such as the psalms.
What I would truly enjoy is to add vocals to the music – in Ugaritic or ancient Hebrew.  Since I have been told that my singing capabilities are not the best, I think a better solution would be to have a native Arabic or Jewish Yemeni singer trained to sing the lyrics as accurately as possible.  My guess is that no Muslim or Jewish singer would sing a hymn to either Yarikh (the moon god) or his wife Nikkal, so he would probably have to be secular or we could simply use Biblical sources for the lyrics.
So, if anybody reading this knows of such a singer willing to do this, please let me know.  We would also need somebody who can handle the software portion of this project.  Until, and unless, all this comes together, this project will remain but a fantasy.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel | Leave a comment

Whites in African universities?

I was reading an article, linked to in American Renaissance, about how some British colleges have neglected to enroll black students over the last several years.  This got me thinking… do African institutions of higher learning seek white students?
I found that the University World News – Africa Edition, ranks African universities based on their internet presence.  This is an imperfect method of ranking, to be sure.  For what it’s worth, the top universities were, conspicuously, in North Africa and South Africa.  In other words, the ones in almost exclusively black African countries were not among the leaders.  The article states:

There are 11 South African and four Egyptian universities in the latest Africa Top 20 of the Web Ranking of World Universities, which rates institutions based on the size and quality of their internet presence. There is also one institution each from Kenya, Senegal, Namibia, Morocco and Tanzania.
The generally poor internet connectivity of Africa’s universities place the continent at a distinct disadvantage in terms of electronic ranking measurement. Those countries with the greatest connectivity, notably South Africa and Egypt, have the most universities in the Top 100, and with 16 institutions in the Top 100 Morocco also achieves a strong presence.

I have already pointed out elsewhere that, if diversity is such a strength, certainly black Africa should be encouraged to pursue it; let them give incentives for white and Asian students to enroll in their colleges and universities.  But it is forbidden to say such things publicly – because dogma states that blacks are already diverse people while whites are not.  In other words whites are considered all the same, and therefore in need of “diversity” but blacks, being the embodiment of diversity itself, need no outside help.  This is what passes for “conventional wisdom” and to suggest otherwise is “racist”.
So, if blacks do not need “diversity”, one would think that they would not complain about this situation.  Not so.  Consider this comment, from the above site:

I think the issue of this ranking has been politicised because those universities claimed to hold the high position are universities where white students are found and who are the judges? Are they not white? If South Africa can boast of many universities being rated high why are they bringing their wards down to Obafemi Awolowo University here in Nigeria? I have many of them as friends who will admit that when it comes to the issue of sound education their country can never be compared with Nigeria. (emphasis mine).

So, not only are whites excluded from black African universities, but it is whites who are then blamed for this phenomenon and its ramifications.
In a nutshell, whites are racist for keeping (even unwittingly) their historic institutions white – but it would also be racist for whites to demand representation in historically black institutions… and it is white racism that is responsible for the low rankings of those all-black institutions.  You simply cannot win if you are white.  Unless, of course, you do not mind being considered a “racist”.  And this is the best approach – as many have been saying for years.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism, racial differences and how they manifest themselves/race science | 8 Comments

Religion: what good is it?

I have just viewed the video series “Why do People Laugh at Creationists” by Thunderf00t.  It is an excellent series and I highly recommend it if you find the time.  In this series, Thunderfoot pokes fun at those who promote “intelligent design”.  The series is very artfully done and includes lots of skillful effects, making it quite entertaining.  His creationist enemies come off looking like a bunch of clueless morons who lack not only the most elementary knowledge of science, but also any sound ethics.  Thunderfoot targets not only Christian fundamentalists, but also Muslims and, to a much lesser extent, Jews.
All this is good and well, and his points are well taken.  He has done humanity a great service through the production of these videos.  But the question remains: is there a legitimate function for organized religion in modern society?  More to the point, does society at large benefit from the fact that so many of its members believe in the Bible or the Quran?
A while ago, I posted about an extraordinary book called “The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind”.  An underlying theme of Julian Jayne’s theory is that the development of consciousness represents a weaning of the human race.  It was (assuming the theory is correct) a weaning from a state where decisions were made for us to a state where we had to make our own decisions.  In a sense, this transformation was an essential stage in the maturity of the human race.  Just as a child must reach a point where he no longer depends upon his parents to guide his every move, but must ponder his own decisions and fate – so too does humanity stand at the very same crossroads.
This transformation has been progressing for many centuries.  It has not been a smooth one.  Rather, there have been many instances of regression.  It is easier to be a child than to be an adult and many people would prefer that divine voices tell them what to do rather than accept the responsibility themselves.  This ongoing process of growing up, like the transformation from bicameralism to “Jaynesian consciousness” before it, does not take place at one universal rate throughout the world.  Rather, some races/ethnicities seem to mature quicker than others.
Many (mostly on the “left”) love to point out how blacks tend to be more spiritual and more religious.  Of the various explanations given for this phenomenon, one is conspicuously missing: blacks need the crutch of religion more to maintain the rudiments of a civil society.  Perhaps, deep in their hearts, they know this; I suspect that some have even said so publicly.  To be fair, many whites also need this crutch.  As a society, we should ask: Are we better off that many NAM’s have some sort of religious faith or are we worse off?  With the exception of radical Islam, I think the answer is clear that we are better off.  Religion can often tame the beast; it can make a positive difference in the lives of many people.  We all benefit from this indirectly.
Religion is a complex institution.  Each flavor can be interpreted in myriad ways.  We can view it as a tool for personal advancement (and hopefully, “advancement” means positive growth and not blowing people up).  I am not sure that there are lessons to be learned from religion that cannot be learned without it – but this does not negate the fact that many people find this easier if religion is their vehicle.
There are atheists who are moral people.  My brother is a good example; he cares deeply about his fellow human beings, strives to be a good citizen and supports his family.  Yet he has no expectation of any sort of eternal reward for his efforts.  He does what he does because he believes it is right.  I am not claiming that all card-carrying atheists are this way, only that those who are have reached a threshold in their maturity where they can stand on their own morally.  They represent, in my view, the next stage in our Jaynesian evolution.  It would be interesting to know what percentage of these “conscientious atheists” are white.  My guess is almost all of them – with a sprinkling of Asians.
As siblings grow up, some take longer to throw away their pacifiers, while others are quicker.  A good parent or sibling would not ridicule a slow child for his pace in growing up; he would have patience and continue to love the child.  So too should we view those who cling to organized religion as their crutch.  If they need it, and if it makes them better people, then we should support them and be kind toward them.  We should not take pleasure in bursting the bubbles of their faith just for fun.  I would condemn any individual who marched into a Mennonite school with the intention of sabotaging the religious instruction of the children.  The Mennonites enjoy an overall healthy and cohesive community.  What good would come of destroying it?  Ultimately, those children will grow up and be able to make their own decisions.
Organized religion can have another function: To maintain the identity of an ethnic group.  Obviously, without Judaism, there would be no Jews.  Hence, organized religion can play a pivotal role in defending one’s genetic interests – though we would be hard-pressed to find any adherent who would cite this as the reason he is a believer.  Yet even the believers would surely agree that, for a people in exile, there is no future without some sort of cohesive force – and religion is the best such force anybody has been able to come up with.
When organized religion poses a danger to our society by overstepping its bounds (within the context of our modern world), then we need to fight them tooth and nail.  This is when we must expose their fallacies – and this is exactly what Thunderf00t does.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Can Phoenicia be restored?

I have found a fascinating website that details the history, and contributions, of the Phoenician people.  It is not unusual for Lebanese to take pride in their Phoenician heritage.  But is it accurate to call  some modern Lebanese “Phoenician”?
Lebanon has seen many invasions over the last two thousand years.  To the casual observer, it would appear that the Phoenicians have gone the way of the renowned Cedar forests of Lebanon.  After all, practically every component of ancient Phoenician culture has disappeared.  Their religion is gone.  Their language is gone.  Their dress, dance, music and mores are all gone.  Therefore, it would follow that the Phoenicians themselves are gone.
Of course all of the above applies, to one extent or another, to Jews as well.  Even the Jewish religion is, arguably, not the same religion it was in ancient times; it has “evolved” almost beyond recognition.  Yet nothing stops us Jews from calling ourselves “Jews”.  Probably because there has been a continuous ethnic identity with us.  I do not believe the same can be said about the Phoenicians.  But who says continuity is a prerequisite for ethnic identity?
I say let modern Lebanese call themselves “Phoenician” if they wish.
I do wonder if any efforts are being made to restore some of the ancient traits of Phoenicians.  Is ancient Hebrew (AKA Phoenician) being revived in Lebanon?  Are the old gods being restored?  Is traditional Phoenician garb making a comeback?  Making themselves distinctive, in some way, from the surrounding non-Phoenician populations, would go a long way toward restoring their identity.  If this is, indeed, their endeavor, then they certainly have my blessing – as long as they refrain from practices such as human sacrifice.
Note: The site listed above, includes audio recordings of Aramaic being read for Christian ceremonies.  To me, it sounds like they are being read in a Persian accent.  Therefore, the gutturals have been compromised.  Some of the vowels also sound Persian – but there is no way to know how they would have been pronounced, exactly, in antiquity.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 5 Comments

The ten most traumatic films…

According to The Vine, these films were so scary that they destroyed the psyches of countless children.  What was so horrible about each of them?
10)  “Meet the Feebles” shows a muppet shooting up drugs in a bathroom.
9)  “Candyman” plays on our superstitious fears with a bloodthirsty ghost.
8)  “It” features a scary clown.  Need I say more?
7)  “Poltergeist” involves children being attacked by monsters under their beds.
6)  “Grease 2” is a musical featuring an all-white cast.
5)  “Nightmare on Elm St.” might explain why insomnia is so prevalent these days.
4)  “Child’s Play” would make any child wary of playing with dolls ever again.
3)  “The Exorcist” takes the innocence out of childhood in many ways.
2)  “Watership Down” depicts cuddly rabbits being torn apart by dogs and such.
1)  “Return to Oz” has Dorothy being chased around by creepy long-legged spider-like men.  As an alternative, #1 has Dorothy being chased by headless zombies.
Now I ask you, which one of the above seems out of place?  If you guessed #6 then you might have dangerous ideas in your head.  An all-white cast?  Horror of horrors!  Though the author, “lukeryan” would have us believe that the real horror is the music involved.  Really, it’s not that bad.

Posted in examples of propaganda | 4 Comments

Rhinoplasty: a crime against nature

Say what you will about the Iranians.  It might be so that many of them are Islamic fanatics.  That they can be temperamental – there is probably some truth to that as well.  But why is it that so many of them are dissatisfied with their own natural look?  Yes, it is true that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  But I, for one, find Iranians to be quite attractive people overall.  Their women are famous for their beauty, and yet Iran is the epicenter of a rhinoplasty  craze.
There is much to be said about prominent, aquiline noses – especially in the Middle East.  Conventional theory tells us that large noses evolved in arid regions so that they could warm cold air before it enters the lungs.  I don’t buy it.  To me, it is obvious that some ancient peoples simply found large noses to be attractive and here we have a case of sexual selection.
It seems that, according to some “experts”, a convex nose is a “defect”.   But King Xerxes, of ancient Persia, would have been deeply offended to learn that his nose was anything but perfect.  Any plastic surgeon who dared recommend that he get his “nose done”, would himself have been done in through scaphism.



I wonder if those “experts” would have considered Sargon the Great’s nose to be defective as well.  Sargon would probably have had them impaled for saying such a thing – and rightfully so!

The Assyrians came from the far North of the Middle East, near the Caucasus Mountain area – which was far from arid.  Yet they too seemed to have no problem showing off their distinctive noses.  Here we have King Ashurnasirpal proudly displaying his for all the world to see:


The ancient Hittites were famous for their noses.  Even though they were counted among the seven cursed nations of Canaan, it is likely they contributed to Jewish ancestry enough to give Jews this reputation as well.  On behalf of my fellow Jews, who inherited this feature, I give thanks to the Hittites.  Alas!  I was left out of this legacy.


Ancient Egyptians  appreciated the hawkish nose of Pharaoh Ramses the Great so much that they took great pains to preserve it for eternity.  Anybody caught drawing unflattering caricatures of the pharaoh, as they do now with Ahmadinejad, might have found himself buried alive.

The Mayan Indians highly valued noses that modern plastic surgeons would have considered “defective”.  This is certainly a case of sexual selection.  It would not surprise me if those with deficient noses were selected for sacrifice to the gods.


The “Roman nose” is famous – and probably really does go back to the Romans.  The Romans actually had a name for those with a large, hooked nose: “nasones“.  Anybody who ridiculed it would probably have been crucified.

The Hapsburgs, inbred as they were, may have considered their prominent noses to be evidence of their royal Roman ancestry.


Even the British seem to have appreciated prominent noses.  Although English noses tend to be more modest, so many noteworthy Englishmen are shown in a manner that emphasizes their noses that it appears those who had it flaunted it.  I suspect that artists would even embellish it as flattery.

I think it is interesting that the peoples whose noses were generally concave, flat, small or pug were also the ones most likely to be subjugated by other peoples.  The Negroes and Slavs were both used as slaves while the Celts have spent the last 1,500 years in gradual retreat and struggle for survival.  As for the East Asians, they were too far away to be affected by this Western phenomenon.

Posted in Jewish stuff and Israel, pan-nationalism and multi-culturalism | 7 Comments