If you refer to the “about” section of this blog, you’ll see nothing about trying to be popular; I’ll put my opinions out there, and you can either agree or not – and you can explain why in comments. If somebody is going to hate me for my opinions, then I don’t need that person as a friend anyway. Warning: Graphic photo near the bottom.
With that in mind, I’ll now lay out my thoughts on the China Virus:
Trump was right to call it The China Virus. I won’t get upset if you call it something else, and I often do so myself, but we should place the blame where it appears to belong: The Chinese Communist Party.
This virus is real. It’s not simply a variety of the flu. Plenty of conspiracies surround it, but its very existence shouldn’t be in question.
The China Virus is not something we should shrug off, and we shouldn’t disregard all warnings regarding it simply because they come from sources we hate. Healthy skepticism is good, but we shouldn’t reject everything scientists/doctors say just because we know that science and medicine have been severely compromised. Even liars are right sometimes, and to varying degrees.
The China Virus has been politicized way too much. Whether you’ve had the vaccine, or wear a mask, shouldn’t be a litmus test for your political views. One can be a flaming leftists and still reject the China Virus narrative, and one can be “Far-Right” and still get the vaccine or wear a mask. These are matters of personal choice. Like so many other things, we can disagree and still respect each other or be friends.
The Establishment Left/Deep State has clearly used the China Virus as a tool to impose tyranny, especially in places like Australia. We, in the United States, need to fight tooth and nail against vaccine mandates and other overreaching dictates from the Commies who now sit in the White House and in Congress.
We’ve clearly been lied to about the number of China Virus fatalities. Numbers have been inflated to justify more power-grabs by governments.
Corporations have also taken advantage of the pandemic to excuse poor customer service and inflated prices.
The China Virus affects different people differently, and it’s still unclear why. Obviously, if you have other complications, such as obesity, then you’re more at risk – but you can still die from it even if you’re young and healthy. I met an older gentleman recently who had just gotten out of the hospital, where he had been intubated for about two months due to the China Virus. He barely made it out alive. Even though he was out of the hospital, he struggled to breath, as if he were suffering from late-stage emphysema. His voice was labored and raspy. He showed me his foot, which had been impacted by the disease, and allowed me to photograph it:
He might lose his small toe
In case you’re wondering, the man HAD been vaccinated. I’ve spoken to other China Virus survivors, and their stories support my above statement, that each person reacts differently. Needless to say, I have NOT spoken to anybody who did NOT survive the disease, but I do have friends and family who have lost loved ones.
I’ve got to admit, a lot of good opinion pieces have been coming out of Newsweek lately; they’re definitely a notch or two above the likes of CNN or the Washington Post.
While it’s great that Newsweek published this article, and it’s great that Mr. Love did a fine job writing it, I find it disturbing that, in the year 2021, “reputable” news sources still consider it necessary to take certain precautions when bringing up black crime.
In his opinion piece, Mr. Love emphasizes that the Corporate Media’s policy of defending blacks, especially black criminals, leads to more blacks dying. This is true – but what about non-blacks who are victimized by black criminals? Is their blood not as red? Mr. Love is aware, as is his publisher, that any concern for white victims of black crime would invite massive scorn, boycotts and probably the departure of several advertisers. Best to be cautious, and focus only on black victims. What a sordid state of affairs!
Mr. Love is black, and I’m sure it’s no coincidence that it was he who felt empowered to broach the truth in this matter. In practice, white writers are more limited in what they can say. White voices are not heard.
Even Mr. Love shied away from calling the Corporate Media’s adoration of black by its name. Instead, he refers to it as “its support of woke identity politics.”
Worse still, in my view, is Mr. Love’s claim that “black men are over-criminalized and portrayed as violent.” On the contrary. Black men are UNDER-criminalized, and portrayed as wise and all-knowing. In order for them to be over-criminalized, the Corporate Media would have to OVER-report black crime, and this is clearly not the case – as Mr. Love very well knows. It would be interesting to ask him how he reconciles his claims that a) the media defends blacks as a matter of policy and b) the media “over-criminalizes” blacks. There might, indeed, be a good answer.
There was a time when blacks were banned from Oregon. Today’s media organizations tell us how evil this was. For example, this Washington Post article describes it as a shameful chapter in our history. All other media outlets seem to agree. Modern Oregonians are constantly reminded of our “racist past,” and how we must work harder to overcome it…
But let us not worry; the Portland Police Association has released a “Five-Year Plan” to tackle the problem*. The Five-Year Plan includes:
Engaging in proactive community policing in our neighborhoods
Addressing the deadly surge in gun and gang violence.
Both of these are code for “trying to address black violence in the city.” It’s no secret that most of this violence comes from young black males. Nobody denies it – but hey, they wanted more Diversity, and they got it.
I do find it disturbing that the Portland Police Association would use the term “Five-Year Plan.” I’m not a history professor, but I’m well aware of the history of this term. Both the Soviet Union and Communist China were infamous for their implementation of Five-Year Plans.
There are two possibilities here. Either the Association is completely oblivious to the history of the term Five-Year Plan, or they’re aware of it. Both possibilities are disturbing. This is ominous. It bolsters the impression many of us already had: Powerful elites are using forced Diversity to create mayhem and chaos, which they can then use as an excuse to impose martial law and authoritarianism. We’re already seeing this in Australia, where authorities are actually using the term “New World Order” as they capitalize on the China Virus to behave more like Communist China, depriving citizens of their most basic rights.
In America, there is too much resistance to the single China Virus approach, not to mention the fact that we’re still armed. Here, the authorities are using a two-pronged approach: China Virus + rising crime.
In other news, Wendy’s manager Demarrus Pritchett throws hot oil on customer Zayveon Johnson. From the moment their mothers named them Demarrus and Zayveon, trouble had been brewing.
Oh, the wonders of Diversity!
*The original story that led me to this article described it as a “Five-Year Plan.” However, the linked article refers to it as a “Five-Year Vision.” I think they changed the name after somebody pointed out the historic significance of the original name. When the other story was written, it hadn’t yet been changed.
The FBI has recently released its crime statistics for the year 2020, and a hearty congratulations is in order for American blacks; their share of homicides has risen to 56.52%!
In the FBI’s expanded homicide data, the black share of known murder offenders increased to a new record of 56.52%.
But, the big news is that while the number of known murder offenders (who can therefore be tabulated racially) increased by 17.3 percent, the number of Unknown murder offenders grew 36.0%. Traditionally, murders in black neighborhoods tend to have the lowest clearance rate, what with snitches getting stitches.
So the black share of murder offenders likely went up even more.
As usual, the FBI stats sloppily lump together Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites into a white supercategory that is out of sync with how most government agencies think about race and ethnicity over the last generation. Hence, I just look at black vs. nonblack (white, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, etc)…
If you use the more expansive latter figure for the at least partially racially black population of 14.2%, then the ratio of black (and blackish) known murder offenders to nonblack known murder offenders in 2020 was 8.4 to 1. (If use use the more restrictive black-only figure of 12.4%, you get a black to non-black ratio of 9.8 to 1.)
Incredibly, even the the lower (at least part-black) ratio of 8.4 to one is a little higher than the the per capita male to female known murder offender ratio of 7.5 to 1.
We see that the black-on-white homicide rate is higher than the male-on-female homicide rate…
Whereas violence against whites is a major cause of reduced quality of life, distress, injury and death for whites and has serious secondary effects for families, communities, and the economy…
Whereas psychologists, as researchers, service providers, and policy advocates, have important roles to play in educating the public and preventing and treating violence against whites;
Whereas levels of assaultive and lethal violence against whites remain high, despite two decades of increased awareness and legislation;
Therefore be it resolved that the American Psychological Association:
Support public policy initiatives in research, prevention and intervention areas, including legal and legislative reform.
Support legislative efforts that seek to redress race-based power imbalances, including legislation on civil rights…
Explore avenues to improve training of psychologists to recognize and treat victims of violence and to conduct research on prevention and intervention with the white victims themselves…
Explore interventions for children and adolescents who have been exposed to racial violence and who are therefore at risk for violent behavior or victimization.
Explore avenues to disseminate materials available on violence against whites including those of the APA Task Force on Black Violence Against Whites to policy makers, professional communities, church and community groups, educational institutions and the general public.
Explore ways to increase public and private funding for research on violence against whites.
Explore avenues for showcasing, in the Association’s publications, research on black violence against whites so as to increase the extent to which it is viewed as within the mainstream of psychological concerns.
Explore avenues for greater collaboration with legal, medical, and other professional disciplines on international, national, regional, and local levels to prevent violence against whites.
If you watch this video clip, you’ll see that Jerry Nadler opposed an amendment that would have excluded illegal immigrants, who have a history of drunk driving, from gaining amnesty:
He said,
Someone can change. That’s why we have the waiver provision. You may have any number of convictions for DUI because you’re a drunk. Because you’re an alcoholic. But you also may cease to be an alcoholic, and we all know people… who are no longer alcoholics and ought to be able to enjoy the benefits of the law.
This would be a good time to point out that driving is a privilege, not a right – and benefiting from amnesty is also not a right – and yet Mr. Nadler is willing to ignore past transgressions to protect such privileges for illegal immigrants…
“That is why we must take swift and decisive action to reduce the daily toll of gun violence that afflicts our nation. H.R. 8, the ‘Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021,’ is sensible and effective legislation to do just that.
“Under current law, gun sales conducted by licensed firearms dealers may only be completed if the buyers clear background checks. This bill would simply extend that requirement, with limited exceptions, to guns transferred by unlicensed individuals as well.
“That simple change to close a gaping loophole in the law is one of the most effective steps we can take to address the scourge of gun violence in this country.
“According to one study, 22 percent of gun owners in the U.S. acquired their most recent firearm without a background check. We do not know if they were felons, fugitives, domestic abusers, or otherwise prohibited under the law from possessing firearms. A huge volume of guns was sold with no questions asked. It is time to close this dangerous loophole.
“There is no reason to continue to make it easy for people who are legally prohibited from possessing firearms to acquire them. And the evidence clearly shows that background checks work and significantly curb gun violence.
There is not a shadow of a doubt that Americans will die as a result of the influx of drunk drivers. It’s already a daily occurrence, and once again, we see how cheap the lives of Americans are in the eyes of Democrats.
In the same Tucker Carlson video, cited above, we see how an amendment to bar gang members from the amnesty was also rejected by Democrats:
When I read about the influx of Afghans into our country, one of my first thoughts was that incidents of rape are going to increase as a result. It turns out, they’re not even waiting for their release into American streets. From The Daily Caller:
Female Fort Bliss Soldier Allegedly Assaulted In Camp Holding Thousands Of Afghans
A female Fort Bliss soldier was allegedly assaulted Sept. 19 by a group of Afghan refugees at the Doña Ana County Range Complex in New Mexico, The El Paso Times reported Friday.
Fort Bliss officials confirmed that the alleged assault was reported and is being investigated by the FBI, according to ABC7.
“We can confirm a female service member supporting Operation Allies Welcome reported being assaulted on Sept. 19 by a small group of male evacuees at the Doña Ana Complex in New Mexico,” Lt. Col. Allie Payne, director of Public Affairs for Fort Bliss, told ABC7.
Notably missing from the article was any indication that the culprits will be sent back to Afghanistan.
Will the recent influx of Haitians cause problems? This article, from The Daily Beast, should answer that question. Regarding the gangs of Little Haiti, we’re told:
…there are several factions in Little Haiti. Those include Little Haiti Vultures and 77th Street, which is also known by the monikers “Uptown” and “Every Body Eats,” according to federal court documents.
“You also got a group who call themselves The Zombies,” Munch told The Daily Beast. “Miami was built off cliques. They may have grown up in the same hood or went to school together. Then someone does something to somebody else and guys start picking sides.”
Like Sears, Munch believes that modern-day Miami gangbangers don’t have any compassion for who gets caught between them and their targets.
Our rulers in Washington are deliberately flooding the United States with criminals. Their actions are cold, calculating and callous. Human life means nothing to them.
I wish I knew how this will end, but this much is certain: Many good people will die. We can only hope that we, and our loved ones, will be spared.
A Black man was shot and killed outside a bar by a white man in central Oregon, and prosecutors are working to determine whether race played a role in the incident, authorities said.
That’s right folks, in the very first paragraph, the possibility that this was a hate-crime is brought up – even though we can clearly see, from the story, that no motive has been ascertained.
Contrast this with the numerous cases where blacks “randomly” murder whites. I’ve cited several such cases recently, and you should scroll down to read about them.
Unfortunately, the bias is not only from the corporate media; it’s also from the government, as we read in the article:
Investigators are still determining what charges Cranston will face. Prosecutors intend to seek an indictment by presenting evidence to a grand jury before Oct. 5, Deschutes County District Attorney John Hummel said.
“The question I have to decide is whether Cranston’s decision to shoot was motivated in part by (Washington’s) race,” he said. “At the end of the day, it comes down to what was his motivation at the instant that he committed the crime.”
That’s right, they’ll be actively looking for any excuse to call this a “hate-crime.” Perhaps I’m mistaken, but I don’t recall that prosecutors made similar statements in ANY of the black-on-white murders we have seen recently. This goes hand in hand with one of my recent posts, where I wrote about the Oregon FBI actively seeking white-on-POC hate crimes, but showing no concern for hate-crimes against whites.
It wouldn’t surprise me if prosecutors get a bonus for finding, or prosecuting, white-on-POC hate crimes, but no bonus if it’s the other way around.
This double standard is extremely obvious, and many of us are tired of it. We want NEWS, not propaganda!
Update: It’s now October 1st, and a followup Associated Press article tells us, in the very first paragraph:
BEND, Ore. (AP) — A grand jury has indicted a white man on charges, including murder, in the shooting death of a Black man outside a nightclub in Bend, a district attorney said.
Notably absent, from this article, is any mention of hate-crime charges. This implies that so far they have found no evidence that this crime was racially motivated – but this didn’t stop the Associated Press from bringing up race in the first paragraph.
The 2021 American Renaissance conference is less than two months away, and that means I’ll be spending time at airports pretty soon.
Airports are the perfect place to wear Rebel insignia, and show our support for America, freedom and all that is good and wholesome. Therefore, I ordered a couple of Rebel masks from DLGrandeurs.com. The prices were reasonable, and my product was shipped immediately.
Anyway, it turns out they’re made in China.
My guess is that there are no factories in the US willing to fill such orders; they’d be cancelled. I would like to think that if it were possible, the website owners would prefer to sell made-in-American products, even if they cost more.
In any event, I do look forward to wearing them on my travels.
As I’ve pointed out many times before, the Establishment Left will inject race, and anti-whiteism, into every aspect of human existence. Since the ultimate eradication of whites is first and foremost on their minds, at every waking moment, they’ll find ways to incorporate this message at every opportunity.
Here’s one example from P.G.E. (Portland General Electric). I just got an email from them, inviting me to take a tour of their new model homes, designed to combat Climate Change. It’s called Homes of Tomorrow Today, and it somewhat reminds me of so many other Communist-inspired slogans, such as “Build Back Better.” Here are the graphics included in the presentation:
In case you’re dense, and need help seeing the obvious, I’ll spell it out: Four white females are featured here, and the last image features a white woman with a black man and mixed children. The only white man shown is a distant aerial view showing a pair of pale arms installing solar panels. This image comes directly before the one with the mixed couple – the implication being that the white man’s role is to serve, and work toward a future where his genetic legacy is replaced by that of the black man.
Indoctrinated people will glance at this post, and remark, “It’s just random people! Why do these racists read so much into simple, random, graphics?”
If you’re one of these people, then find a similar example where the roles are reversed. Even if you do find such an example, it’s one in a thousand; the P.G.E. example is the norm. We see it everywhere. Children see it as they grow up, and it shapes their views of the world – we can only assume that this is the goal.
“White supremacist” is a slur and propaganda term meant to imbue someone with images of “scary” fat ugly stupid skinheads and toothless rednecks who are motivated solely by an irrational hatred of all other races. I reject this image wholesale, but I’m probably the demographic you’re referring to as a White, racially conscious man. I don’t necessarily believe Whites are a “superior” race, but I do think we are rather great, and certainly have accomplished more than most other peoples.
That aside, if your dog has ticks, are the ticks a threat to the dog? The answer is yes. Would the ticks thus be superior to the dog by virtue of posing a threat to it? Are you suggesting that superiority derives from the ability to inflict the most terror and suffering on others? Strange perspective, especially considering how these behaviors supposedly are innate to “White supremacy” are the excuse for undermining any sort of White racial consciousness. Shouldn’t you be a “White supremacist” if you believe that?
The problem facing White people today is a complete lack of racial unity, not necessarily that other races are better than them. While all other races possess racial consciousness to enormous degrees, Whites hardly do at all.
Not only that, but White liberals ALL possess on average an intense hatred for their own race, while moderates and conservatives might have a slight racial preference but are for all practical purposes, totally apathetic.
It isn’t really a surprise however that these are the results, after all, ethnocentrism is natural in all, but encouraged in Blacks and other non-Whites with their heritage singled out for celebration (think things like “Black History Month”) while White ethnocentrism is seen as the greatest evil of all time. The educational system chock-full of blatant anti-White narratives, with the idea that Western history since Columbus (and even before) has just been an exercise in unprecedented brutality and irrational hatred of the other races all living in kumbaya by Whites, culminating in the Holocaust (hallowed by its name) being ground into the heads of schoolchildren. This leads to resentment among the non-Whites and self-hatred among the Whites. The media, academia, and social media are all also blatantly anti-White, promoting every obnoxious narrative to vilify Whites.
And really, all of this barely scratches the surface. There is also the issue that the media will promote stories about every sort of interracial crime, real or imagined, of Whites against non-Whites. However, never will there be any reports beyond local media about non-White on White attacks, despite them being far more common.
This even ignores stories which are explicitly “hate crimes”, such as those involving mass murder[1] or rape[2], which, had they occurred in reverse, would have caused limitless outcry from the media and would be used examples around the world of “American racism”.
While 2020 was in defined in no small part by the riots going on for months over the death of George Floyd, with a constant flow of support for them from media and politicians over how it supposedly showed “American police racism”, not one “abolish the police” cry came from those when a Black cop who simply murdered in cold-blood a White woman is now getting his 12 and a half year sentence (where Derek Chauvin got 22) reduced to 4 years as his charges got downgraded to manslaughter, despite the circumstances[3]. For a system supposedly so entrenched in “White supremacy”, they seem oddly sympathetic to non-Whites and awfully hostile to Whites…
Considering the growing hatred for Whites by non-Whites and considering their racial collectivism, considering the pathological hatred the tens of millions White liberals have their own race and the total apathy towards their race by the vast majority of the rest of Whites, perpetrated by the media which has a near total monopoly on the flow of information, as well has every other institution in society, I think it is fair to say that even if Whites are a “superior” race, we’ll have a hard time in the future.
Now, it could be argued that all of this could have been avoided had Whites truly been “superior”, as they would not be able to be subverted to begin with. On a certain level, it is true. Collectively, we do deserve punishment for allowing a hostile alien race to take control of our flow of information and perceptions of reality, and for allowing traitors who sold us out to our racial enemies to rule us. However, it is overly simplistic. It ignores the vast complexity of the eventual subversion and annihilation of White racial consciousness. It places too much emphasis on being shrewd and cutthroat, and not enough emphasis on anything else, which is not natural to our race.
That said, there can be change, however only if Whites stand up as a collective and put aside their differences, and that’s a big if which will almost certainly not happen. However, Whites can stand against all odds if that does happen. Rhodesia and South Africa, neither of which was more than 15% White at their peaks, only fell because they were totally isolated from the rest of the world and were unable to achieve self-sufficiency, otherwise they had immense success against the Black guerillas in their country and never lost against them in battle.
However, the same cannot be said of America, let alone the whole White world united. Not only would it be strong enough to withstand any foreign intervention, but it would be large enough to be able to achieve total self-sufficiency.
If we manage to take control of our countries again, and if manage to secure them as exclusively our own once again, the world will once more take an upward Faustian path, a path of rich culture, civilization, and discovery. Our countries will be clean and beautiful once more, people will once more be happy and satisfied in life, and most importantly, our whole existence will be secured and the legacy of the tens of thousand of years of ancestors that came before will be protected and will be able to be extended. If we lose, the world will sink into an eternal darkness and a dull state of eternal decay. If we lose, all of the dreams, hopes, achievements, legacies of the tens of thousands of years of ancestors of our people will have been in vain. No greater struggle exists than that between existence and non-existence, and it is quite telling that many of our people are more worried about the existence or non-existence of the Siberian Tiger than that of their very own flesh and blood. It will be a hard fight, but if we win, it shall be the greatest victory to ever be achieved in the whole history of our existence, putting to shame even the conquests of the British Empire and all the glories of Caesar and Napoleon, and all it takes is for us to once again regain our racial consciousness and to do what is necessary to preserve our race.
All is going according to plan, and evil white-hating elites are rubbing their hands together in delight. At this pace, soon they’ll be filling trains with white people – to be slaughtered on an industrial scale in concentration camps.
Yesterday’s failed recall election in California has shown Gregory Hood to be correct in his recent American Renaissance article:
In California, we saw how successful the Great Replacement strategy has been in disenfranchising whites; even though a “white” man, Gavin Nuisance, defeated a black man, Larry Elder, the implications are obvious. I’m sure leftist celebrities, such as Ellen Degenerate, are delighted at the results.
… and now we learn that a small morsel of justice we took some comfort in, meted out to Somali Affirmative Action police hire Mohamed Noor for the cold-blooded killing of Justine Damond, has been taken away. From the Washington Post:
Court overturns third-degree murder conviction against ex-Minneapolis officer
The Minnesota Supreme Court overturned the third-degree murder conviction of former Minneapolis police officer Mohamed Noor, who fatally shot an unarmed Australian woman in 2017, which could reduce eight years from his prison sentence.
Noor was convicted of third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter for the fatal shooting of Justine Ruszczyk Damond, who had called 911 to report a possible sexual assault behind her home. The case gained attention both in the United States and abroadand was notable because police were rarely charged or convicted in fatal shootings…
In 2019, Noor was sentenced to 12 and a half years in prison for third-degree murder, a crime that involves acting with “a depraved mind, without regard for human life.”
Jurors acquitted Noor of the more serious second-degree murder charge. He was not sentenced for manslaughter.
Supreme Court justices said in their opinion Wednesday that the circumstances of the killing and Noor’s actions do not fit the definition of third-degree murder because he was targeting a single person when he shot his weapon. They ordered the case be sent to the district court, where Noor will be sentenced on the second-degree manslaughter conviction, according to court documents.
Noor has already served more than 28 months of his sentence. If he is sentenced to four years for manslaughter, he could be eligible for supervised release as early as in three and a half months, legal experts say.
If this isn’t a miscarriage of justice, I don’t know what is. Since when does “targeting a single person” serve as a defense for murder? It doesn’t – and this only happened because his charges were watered down in the first place.
The contrast with the way Derek Chauvin was treated is sickening. The article does go on to state that the decision might help Chauvin’s defense team to overturn his third-degree murder conviction. After all, Chauvin was also targeting only one person.
I have confidence in the system that they’ll find a way to exclude Chauvin from this defense. Western governments are so biased against white people, I’m not sure why they even pretend to care about justice anymore.
