MediaGov Creates Racial Caste-System and Racial Strife

Posted on February 3, 2022 by jewamongyou

The median age for US citizens is about 40. Hence, most Americans weren’t even alive yet when Congress passed its first racial set-aside law in 1977; this racial caste system has been around their entire lives. There have been ups and downs since then, but the general trend has been for such set-asides to become ever more entrenched and rooted in American jurisprudence. Hence we now have large organizations, such as the NMSDC, which was the subject of an excellent Revolver expose:

Most Americans do not realize the full extent to which a racially based spoils system is fundamentally embedded in American economic life. They know about affirmative action in school admissions (though many mistakenly believe affirmative action is a “tiebreaker” as opposed to an enormous boost for the recipient). But the racial spoils system in America reaches much further and deeper into the very marrow of our Regime. Countless employers adhere to a racial caste system in order to avoid running afoul of federal civil rights investigators…

To get access to big government contracts and set-asides by major corporate actors, you need to be the right race. So, how is that decided?

For that, you can turn to a little known organization called the National Minority Supplier Development Council. The NMSDC’s goal is to help minority-owned businesses secure more business contracts, through relationships with both government and hundreds of major corporate partners, ranging from Facebook and Google, to Ford and GM, to Walmart and Coca-Cola.

How do you win a spot at NMSDC’s table? By convincing the organization’s officials that you deserve one of its coveted official Race Card™s to play for fun and profit. How does the NMSDC decide if you’re worthy of their coveted Race Card™? Simple: The group defines a minority as “an individual who is at least 25 percent Asian, Black, Hispanic or Native American.” To do that, one literally must submit a driver’s license, a passport, a birth certificate, or the birth certificate of one’s parent or child in order to prove one has the “right” racial group. And the NMSDC has a clear definition of who is right, and who is wrong:

That’s right, one must CERTIFY his racial blood quantum in order to qualify for this spoils system – and NMSDC is just one of many such organizations, corporate and government, that enforce this racial caste system. The very long Code of Federal Regulations, Title 13, Part 124, makes it quite clear that “disadvantaged” excludes white males by default. It includes all non-whites by default.

These laws and codes have been on the books for many years now – and the irony is that they’ve been CREATING a disadvantaged group in America: White males. To the extent that white males still dominate in some areas, it’s because of legacy positions (IE. the Clintons, the Bidens and other well-heeled white elitists who love to preach to the rest of us about “privilege”) and it’s because the status quo has FORCED white males to be so much better than their competitors that they’ve gotten ahead by sheer force of effort. Otherwise, they wouldn’t stand a chance.

The LA Times recently reported on a black UCLA professor who threatened a white colleague with violence, and sent pornographic material to a student. Of course, the LA Times neglected to mention that the professor is black, and his victim white. Also, this story is curiously missing from MSN’s news feed.

What’s NOT missing from the MSN news feed is this story:

That story is right at the top, and it will likely remain there for some time. Since the culprits are minors, we might never know their identities. It’s possible that they’re black, and we can add this to the long list of “hate-crime” hoaxes. It’s also possible that they’re white, and the question arises: What would motivate them to do this?

Notice that Black History Month story to the lower left of the image. The fact is that Black History Month has been abolished; it’s now “Black History Year” all year long. The Corporate Media is so focused on blacks that we hardly see a difference in February. All of corporate America has followed McDonald’s lead, and it’s now 365 black for everybody all the time.

Where does this leave white youth? It leaves them either brainwashed or feeling unwanted and neglected. A backlash is guaranteed, and I’ve warned about this – exactly a year ago, on Feb. 3, 2021.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Whoopi Goldberg; a Big Deal Over Nothing

Posted on February 2, 2022 by jewamongyou

So Whoopi Goldberg said that the Nazi Holocaust wasn’t about race, and now millions of people have gone hysterical over it. I say it’s not a big deal. She didn’t say anything hateful or spiteful – or even ignorant for that matter. Sure, the Nazis thought it was about race, but that doesn’t mean that everybody else needs to see it that way.

I happen to disagree; I think it WAS about race, to a certain extent. Goldberg could be completely wrong on every level, but we’re all wrong sometimes. We can be wrong, even about race, without being “racist.” The Nazi Holocaust has become one of those subjects about which we’re not allowed to have disagreements, except regarding its most insignificant minutiae. As far as I’m concerned, no subject should possess that level of sanctity. Everything should be open for discussion.

Every time something like this happens, I hope that the powerful elites will notice how ridiculous the whole affair really is. So somebody said “nigger,” somebody criticized BLM, or didn’t show enough reverence toward gender-confused people. Don’t we have REAL issues to be concerned about? Maybe when people are starving in the streets due to COVID restrictions, or a Biden war, enough people will wake up and get their priorities straight.

It’s been pointed out that such indiscretions are typically dealt with much more harshly when the offender is white, so I’ll share a meme somebody posted on our “It’s Okay to be White” space on Quora:

I’ll also point out that, while Goldberg got off with a two-week paid holiday, an incoming Georgetown law professor (who appears to be Jewish) has been placed on administrative leave, and might get fired, for pointing out the obvious: Biden’s Supreme Court pick will be a “lesser black woman.” From MSN (Business Insider):

Georgetown Law students occupied an auditorium on Tuesday to demand the firing of an academic who said President Joe Biden would nominate a “lesser Black woman” to fill Justice Stephen Breyer’s Supreme Court seat, National Review reported.

Ilya Shapiro, who was set to start as a professor at Georgetown Law on February 1, was placed on administrative leave earlier this week pending an investigation after his comments prompted widespread condemnation, including from the law school’s dean, William Treanor.

But students were unsatisfied with this decision, calling for Shapiro’s “immediate termination” in a Monday message chain tweeted by National Reviews’ Nate Hochman.

Students, who were asked to wear all black in solidarity, staged the sit-in in an auditorium at the law center, where Treanor spent more than an hour answering questions, National Review reported.

Professor Shapiro’s assessment is even more accurate than most people would think. As Jared Taylor points out:

President Biden has announced that his nominee for the Supreme Court will be a black woman. Rather than asking, “Who is the best qualified?” he will be asking “Who has the right sex and skin color?” According to a 2019 report, only 3.4 percent of sitting judges are black women. The president is therefore limiting his search — for someone to endow with a lifetime position of great power — to just 3.4 percent of the people who are generally considered qualified. And there is good reason to doubt whether even that 3.4 percent are fully qualified.

Despite decades of recruitment and affirmative action, blacks are underrepresented in law schools: 8 percent of students vs 13.5 percent of the population. They are more likely to be in bottom-ranked law schools (16 percent of students) than in top-ranked schools (6 percent). Black first-year students are twice as likely as white first-years to drop out: 11 percent vs. 5.1 percent.

Many of the most able and ambitious law graduates go to work for law firms. In 2020, only 3.04 percent of law firm associates were black women, and only 0.8 percent of the partners were black women. Partnership in a law firm is usually a sign of ability. Why is the black-women representation on the federal bench — 3.4 percent — four times greater than their 0.8 percent share of partners? Probably because judicial appointments are political whereas partners have to be sharp lawyers who can bring in clients. Pressure to be “diverse” is already so great that a good many of the current 0.8 percent probably aren’t qualified.

A black woman justice will mean that her group is overrepresented on the court: 11 percent of justices, vs 6.7 percent of the population. This is affirmative action heaped upon affirmative action.

We live in a theocracy where speaking the truth can get you in serious trouble.

Posted in Africa and blacks, freedom of speech issues, Jewish stuff and Israel, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Swedish Woman Decapitated in Congo; Sweden: Spare the Murderers!

Posted on January 31, 2022 by jewamongyou

Full disclosure: I’ve just indulged in a bit of clickbait – but it’s not far from the truth. From an MSN story:

A military court has sentenced 49 people to death — while one officer will receive 10 years in prison — following an investigation into the 2017 murders of two UN experts in the Democratic Republic of Congo, according to Human Rights Watch…

UN experts Zaida Catalan, from Sweden, and Michael Sharp, from the US, were investigating large scale human rights violations in the Kasai region as members of the UN Group of Experts on Congo before the Congolese government announced on March 13, 2017 that they were captured by “unidentified negative forces.”

Two weeks later, UN peacekeepers discovered their bodies along with those of their local interpreter, Betu Tshintela, outside Kananga.

A Congo government official told CNN at the time that Catalan’s body was found decapitated, but Sharp and Tshintela were not beheaded…

The Swedish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ann Linde, said in a tweet that Sweden would study the verdict and might appeal the result since the country “strongly opposes the use of the death penalty in all circumstances without exception.”

There’s a reason Africans are traditionally harsh with criminals; otherwise, their societies would be overrun, and controlled, by violent gangs. Indeed, this is often the case – but most Africans, just like the rest of us, would prefer that their loved ones not be murdered or raped. Higher crime-rates require more extreme measures. Europe was once this way, and people would be executed for even the most trivial offenses. Over time, Europe was able to get rid of most of its psychopaths. Other parts of the world must be allowed to catch up.

The process of cleaning the gene-pool of undesirables is a messy one. It can never be perfect, but if a country like Sweden were to dissuade the Congolese from executing criminals it would smack of naivety and cultural colonialism. It’s up to Congo to decide how to deal with its criminals, not Sweden, and what works in Sweden might not work in Congo.

Considering the wave of rapes and murders that “migrants” have wrought in Sweden, one would think that the Swedish are already aware of this – but ignorance is the official policy there.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

An Abandoned Beach Resort

Posted on January 29, 2022 by jewamongyou

Ruins can be fascinating, because they stimulate us to imagine what once was, or what could have been. In this case, it’s more the latter, because it looks like this resort was abandoned in mid-construction. Perhaps it was a victim of the 2008 recession:

To view a full-size version of each photo, right-click on it and select “open image in new tab.”

Posted in travel | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

DeSantis Shocker: It’s Not OK to Hate Whites

Posted on January 27, 2022 by jewamongyou

I’ve got a lot to say, but today’s Taki’s Magazine article, by Anne Coulter, is so good, I decided to give her the floor:

DeSantis Shocker: It’s Not OK to Hate Whites

Gov. Ron DeSantis is pushing a bill through the Florida legislature to put a stop to the modern pedagogy of making little girls cry because they’re white. The bill, called “Stop the Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees Act (WOKE),” prohibits classroom instruction that contradicts these concepts:

“No race is inherently superior to another race”;

“An individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, does not bear responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex”…

The left has been having a sneer-fest over the proposed law, howling that it protects “white people” from feeling “uncomfortable.” SNOWFLAKES!

E.g.:

“A bill pushed by Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis that would prohibit public schools and private businesses from making white people feel ‘discomfort’ when they teach students or train employees about discrimination in the nation’s past …” — The Associated Press (emphasis added)

“The right likes to talk so much about, you know, snowflakes. It seems like they may be raising snowflakes because if they think people are going to be uncomfortable by the actual facts — facts are uncomfortable.” — CNN’s Don Lemon

“Ron DeSantis and his GOP allies are pushing a bill … that would prohibit public schools [from making] white people squirm. Those poor, wittle babies.

“Their feelings are hurting. Some poor, wittle white people are uncomfortable about the hundreds of years of racism and hate that built this nation.” — Laura Washington, Chicago Sun-Times

(Saving the best for last …)

“[H]e’s trying to make it illegal, Governor Ron DeSantis, to teach history that would make white people uncomfortable. Does that law include saying you can’t make black people feel uncomfortable or indigenous people? The history of indigenous and African Americans could make one uncomfortable? Is that illegal too, or is it just white people?” — MSNBC’s Joy Ann Reid

To know the answer to Joy Ann’s question, you’d have to actually read the bill. Or an article about the bill. Or commentary on an article about the bill. Joy Ann Reid: highly literate and well-informed Harvard graduate.

But, duh: A bill prohibiting the teaching of race hatred will primarily prevent the teaching of white hatred for the simple reason that it’s the only race we’re allowed to hate. Not merely allowed to hate, but taught to hate, encouraged to hate, paid to hate.

We’re now entering the sixth decade of open, widespread, official discrimination against white people on the basis of their race. Even the Asians suing Harvard dare not stress the humungous advantage given to blacks and Hispanics. No, their beef is about white applicants getting preferential treatment over Asians.

This is odd, to say the least. According to the plaintiffs’ own expert witness, an Asian with a 25% chance of admission to Harvard would increase his chances to 36% if he were white — but to 77% if Hispanic, and to 95% if black…

School districts around the country teach white children that they were born racist and assign books like, “Not My Idea: A Book About Whiteness,” that portrays “whiteness” as a contract with Satan.

So yes, a race-neutral law that prohibits teaching race hatred will, in practice, prohibit teaching hatred of whites because that’s the only race-hate that’s taught.

Liberals jeer at whites who object to this constant disparagement, calling them “poor, wittle babies.” Does the left have any self-awareness at all?

A 6-year-old girl is a total pussy if she can’t take a little abuse for being white — at a school her parents are paying for. But our entire country has been turned upside down for the past half-century to prevent any other race from experiencing a fleeting moment of discomfort.

Historic Confederate statues are torn down and melted; newspapers refuse to identify the race of criminals — or even show photos of the arrestees; the Oscars will not consider a movie for Best Picture that does not have 30% non-whites.

Otherwise, black people might feel uncomfortable.

Professor Amy Wax of the University of Pennsylvania Law School is routinely threatened with suspension or firing from her tenured position for stating facts about black students’ performance. Her remarks make black people feel uncomfortable.

Hey, where’s the rush to review Charles Murray’s recent book Facing Reality about black crime and I.Q.? Nope, might make black people uncomfortable.

A few years ago, Kansas City officials were advised not to impose a curfew in response to the violent mobs of black teenagers descending on a shopping plaza because, as the black mayor said, it would “make a lot of black kids angry.” His remark inspired the title of Colin Flaherty’s book about black crime, Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry — a book that is currently banned from Amazon. It might make black people uncomfortable.

Anti-whiteness books are flooding the grade schools, but you aren’t allowed to spend your own money to purchase books on Amazon that make some people “uncomfortable.” Not only Flaherty’s book, but:

— Ryan Anderson’s When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment — might make transgenders uncomfortable.

— Jared Taylor’s If We Do Nothing, as well as two books he contributed to: Race Against Time and Face to Face With Race — might make black people uncomfortable.

— The Kindle edition of the widely praised 1973 dystopian novel by French author Jean Raspail, Camp of the Saints — might make third worlders uncomfortable.

— David Cole’s rollicking autobiography, Republican Party Animal — makes Debra Messing uncomfortable.

The FBI allowed the 9/11 attack to happen by blowing off an Arizona agent’s warning that a lot of Arabs were enrolled in flight school. Three thousand Americans had to die because noticing Arabs in flight school might make some people uncomfortable.

Last week, a Muslim terrorist, Malik Faisal Akram, seized a Texas synagogue and held four hostages for 10 hours. The media universally identified Akram as: “British man.” He didn’t even call himself “British”! A week later, the Anti-Defamation League’s Jonathan Greenblatt went on MSNBC and tried to suggest “Republicans” were responsible for the attack. The truth might make Muslims uncomfortable.

A virus that originated in China cannot be called anything with “China” in the name. That might make Asians uncomfortable.

Before we go, here’s another “actual fact,” as Don Lemon put it, and “facts are uncomfortable” (especially for the black Harvard grad on MSNBC who can’t read a bill): By Harvard’s own admission, nearly 60% of the black students it admits are there only because they are black.

It’s so great that liberals have finally turned against snowflakes so we can discuss “actual facts” again!

Anne Coulter, if you see this post, I hope you don’t mind that I’ve reproduced most of it here; it’s very powerful.

Posted in government/corporate discrimination against whites, politics and attitudes of the pro-white movements, shenanigans of the Left and of non-white activists | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

“I Wasn’t Aware That You’re a Person of Color”

Posted on January 26, 2022 by jewamongyou

Any time there’s an incident of blatant “racism” from a white person, the Corporate Media creatures rejoice, and cherish it like a fine pearl. They’ll highlight it on The News for days or even weeks.

Thus we find MSN featuring a story titled “I wasn’t aware that you’re a person of color.” They’ve been running the story for a few days now.

Reading the included text, from the white customer, I get the distinct impression that the customer either has mental issues, or is trying to make a political point. Either way, she’s rude:

“Can you please cancel my order? Unfortunately, I wasn’t aware that you’re a person of color and I just don’t like to support small business[es] that do not [align] with my version of support. Before you start and go on a race tyrant please be aware it [is] called my preference […] Because we are all aware of how you people like to act when things do not go your way.”

Translation: The customer wants to support white-owned businesses, and was disappointed to discover that this was not a white-owned business. In this post, I’m conceding that the customer was out of line in making the comments she did. Whether your goal is to support black-owned business, white-owned businesses or Jewish-owned businesses, it’s not nice to go back and request a refund when it turns out the owner is not of your favored ethnicity. It’s also uncalled for to demean the owner’s ethnicity or race in the way this customer did.

Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, the main objection seems to be that the customer prefers to avoid giving his business to “people of color.” In other words, she wants to support white-owned businesses, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

What happens when those who want to support black-owned businesses find out the business in question is actually owned by a white person?

Noooooo! Some Of Your Favorite Black-Owned Hair Brands Aren’t Black-Owned

But what’s making us travel even deeper into a different dimension is, apparently, some of your favorite “Black-owned” hair brands are not really black-owned, leaving many sistas confused, like myself, lost and feeling bamboozled.

See, it all started on June 7, when BeautyBossLab posted this comprehensive list, ruffling many of feathers. Take a look…

Then, days later, Black Twitter started popping off with “The Owner   The product” tweets to remind us that not even Blue Magic, Cantu or African Pride is ours!

People Are Shocked These Brands Aren’t Actually Black-Owned

Some expectations have been shattered for people who advocate supporting Black-owned businesses after social media revealed certain brands aren’t wholly owned by Black people.

SheaMoisture was one of the first to start trending on Twitter when it was revealed that the personal care brand was no longer Black-owned. The brand was initially started in Harlem in the early 1990s by Richelieu Dennis and Nyema Tubman, who are Black.

Anger at white woman running black-owned business Instagram

PEOPLE are furious after the creator of a Instagram page promoting black-owned businesses turned out to be white.

The owner of Independent Black Businesses apologised for “being unclear” as she revealed herself as Helen, a white woman, after being accused of digital blackface by people online.

The Brighton and Hove social media page which “celebrates indie black business” was started in June this year and has been asking for money through PayPal and Patreon.

With all of Corporate America, government and the media promoting black-owned businesses, fair-minded people should strive to support white-owned businesses – at least small, family-owned businesses. We should support David in his competition against Goliath. This is the moral thing to do, and we should do so without any disrespect toward non-white business owners.

Posted in Africa and blacks, examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , | 2 Comments

PolitiFact Deception About Judicial Double Standards

Posted on January 25, 2022 by jewamongyou

A Revolver article clearly describes the double standards that American whites face when accused of a crime. Comparing the Kyle Rittenhouse case with the Timothy Simpkins case:

by Scott Greer

A school shooter wounded three people in a rampage at an Arlington, Texas, high school Wednesday. He spent a grand total of one day in jail before he was released on a $75,000 bond Thursday. Media outlets are sympathetically portraying him as a victim of bullying and amplifying his family’s defense. This may shock some readers. Who could be worse than a school shooter? Aren’t we supposed to keep these young monsters locked up so they don’t hurt any more kids?

But there’s something different about this school shooter from the ones you usually hear about on the news. Timothy Simpkins, the 18-year-old shooter is black. In the Globalist American Empire, that awards him privilege. No white school shooter could’ve expected such a generous treatment…

Simpkins’s defense claims he used a gun in self-defense. He allegedly grabbed a gun after the fight and unloaded it in the school. One of his victims is a 25-year-old white teacher who was shot in the back as he tried to break up the fight. He suffered a collapsed lung and broken ribs. Another victim is a 15-year-old male who remains in critical condition.

This sounds pretty indefensible, but Simpkins’s family and lawyer make the case anyway.

“I’m not trying to justify the gun that was brought, but when you’re being bullied, when there’s bullies, throughout this nation you hear of young people … committing suicide,” said family spokeswoman Carol Harrison-Lafayette. “The decision he made, taking the gun, we’re not justifying that. That was not right. But he was trying to protect himself…”

No white family could’ve gotten away with these public statements if their child did a mass shooting. They would’ve received a flood of online harassment and media denunciations. You’re not supposed to claim your kid, who just shot several people, is a lovely boy who did it to protect himself. But that rule apparently doesn’t apply to black school shooters.

It’s noteworthy the family turned to a civil rights attorney to defend Simpkins over a school shooting. Did systemic racism somehow drive him to go on a shooting spree? It’s also noteworthy that she implies this wasn’t a typical school shooting, but it actually resembles the typical mass shooting. Most mass shooters are black, according to a 2016 New York Times report, and the vast majority of them are not the work of some deranged loner murdering people at random. They’re mostly gang-related or the result of brawls—as was the case for Simpkins.

There are cases of whites who resorted to a gun to defend themselves against actual threats. Unlike Mr. Simpkins, they got the book thrown at them. Kyle Rittenhouse was hit with murder charges and a $2 million bail after he gunned down three men who attacked him during the Kenosha riot last year. You can face censorship on major tech platforms for daring to show support for that young man. Meanwhile, several people are openly supporting Simpkins on Twitter, even though there is far less evidence to support his act of violence.

The author of this piece, Mr. Scott Greer, makes a solid case that we have a two-tiered “justice system” in the United States, with a clear bias against white suspects (all else being equal; money still talks).

Along comes PolitiFact, a self-described “fact-checking” site whose motto is:

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.

It turns out that the truth is NOT their primary agenda. Regarding the comparison between Rittenhouse and Simpkins, PolitiFact has this to say:

Comparison of shootings omits key difference: 2 were killed in Rittenhouse case

Wide difference in jail and bail 

The jail and bail details have been widely reported.

Simpkins was released from the Tarrant County jail in Fort Worth on Oct. 7, 2021, the day after the school shooting, after paying a $75,000 bond. His case is pending, with a court date scheduled for Dec. 10, 2021.

Rittenhouse was released from the Kenosha County jail on Nov. 20, 2020, on $2 million bail. He had been in custody since surrendering to police in his hometown of Antioch, Ill., on Aug. 26, 2020, the day after the Kenosha shooting. The jury in his trial on homicide charges began deliberations on Nov. 16, 2021…

Wide differences in outcomes of shootings

Simpkins is charged with three counts of felony aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

Simpkins, 18, was involved in a fight with a 15-year-old student at his high school in Arlington, which is between Dallas and Fort Worth, on Oct. 6, 2021, according to an arrest warrant and news reports. The incident left four people hurt, including three wounded by gunfire.

During the fight, Simpkins fired shots from a handgun, according to police. He turned himself in later that day after police said he was wanted for the shooting.

One teacher was injured from a fall. Three people were wounded, two seriously: the 15-year-old who was in the fight with Simpkins, who was released from a hospital after several surgeries about two weeks later, and a teacher who was hospitalized for about a week.

News reports initially linked the shooting to Simpkins being bullied at school, but the police chief later said bullying was not a factor.

It’s not clear to me how the differences in jail and bond (or bail) help PolitiFact’s case; if anything, these differences highlight the harsher treatment that Rittenhouse received, compared to Simpkins. Simpkins was in jail for one day before his release. Rittenhouse was in jail for almost three months before his release. Both suspects had turned themselves in to the police after the incident, and neither posed a flight risk. Rittenhouse tried to turn himself in IMMEDIATELY after the shooting, while Simpkins only did so later – AFTER HAVING FLED THE SCENE. So we see that Rittenhouse was more cooperative, but received harsher treatment.

The way PolitiFact describes the Simpkins injuries is slightly suspect. It gives the distinct impression that it’s trying to minimize the injuries suffered by Simpkins’ victims – because it should have pointed out that the 15 year-old shooting victim was in critical condition. Instead, it merely states that he “was released from the hospital after several surgeries about two weeks later.”

The PolitiFact article concludes with its most important distinction:

Rittenhouse is charged with four felonies, including two homicide charges.

Rittenhouse, then 17, traveled across state lines from his home in Antioch, Ill., about 20 miles to Kenosha, site of violent protests over a police shooting days earlier. He was armed with an AR-15, and on a self-described mission to protect property. During a confrontation, he shot three people, killing two.

Charged with four felonies and one misdemeanor weapons charge, Rittenhouse said that he shot in self-defense. 

If convicted of the most serious charge, first-degree intentional homicide in one of the shootings, Rittenhouse would face a mandatory sentence of life in prison.

It points out that Rittenhouse actually KILLED two people, and that he faced much more serious charges than Simpkins.

Regarding the charges, this begs the question. Why was Rittenhouse charged with weapons violations to begin with? In fact, as we saw from the trial, he hadn’t violated ANY weapons laws at all! As for Simpkins, why was he NOT charged with any weapons violations? It was clearly illegal for Simpkins to carry a gun, especially on school grounds. PolitiFact is actually bolstering the case for a double-standard by bringing up the charges.

Timothy Simpkins clearly violated Texas gun laws, yet he was only charged with aggravated assault. Kyle Rittenhouse did NOT violate any weapons laws, and yet he was charged with weapons violations. A clear double standard.

Rittenhouse was in mortal danger, and being attacked with deadly weapons when he shot his assailants. This was evident from video footage at the trial. In contrast, Simpkins was attacked only with fists; it’s unclear whether he fired his weapon during, or after, the beating.

So while it’s true that the Rittenhouse case involved actual deaths, those deaths were of men who posed imminent danger to Rittenhouse’s life, as became clear during the trial. Self-defense is not “murder.”

The most disturbing statement in the PolitiFacts article is this one:

Rittenhouse, then 17, traveled across state lines from his home in Antioch, Ill., about 20 miles to Kenosha, site of violent protests over a police shooting days earlier. He was armed with an AR-15, and on a self-described mission to protect property. During a confrontation, he shot three people, killing two.

The implication is that Rittenhouse violated a law by traveling across state lines – and that, somehow, the fact that he traveled 20 miles makes it worse. Conveniently, PolitiFact omits the fact that Rittenhouse had good reason to be in Kenosha, and that “protecting property” is a worthy endeavor, considering the fact that the government had neglected its responsibility to do so.

Worse of all is PolitiFact’s implication that Rittenhouse had illegally transported an AR-15 across state lines. Of course, the article doesn’t say so explicitly, but it cunningly uses wording to IMPLY so, while carefully leaving room for plausible deniability. If PolitiFact’s intentions were not to mislead, then why bring up “crossing state lines” at all? It’s completely irrelevant.

Another difference between the two cases is that Rittenhouse was legally a minor when the incident occurred. He was only 17. In contrast, Simpkins was 18, and legally an adult in Texas. Therefore, Rittenhouse should have been treated more leniently than Simpkins – and yet exactly the opposite is what happened.

Shame on PolitiFact; the truth is clearly NOT their priority.

Posted in crime and violence, examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

The “Benefits” of Diversity in the New York Subway System

Posted on January 23, 2022 by jewamongyou

A Change.org petition is asking the City of New York to built safety barriers to protect people from being shoved into oncoming trains:

Everyone deserves to be safe when riding the subways.

At least 4 Asians have been shoved towards the tracks in about 6 months.

At least 4 people have lost their lives having been pushed onto the tracks and others have narrowly escaped death. 

Other cities with less resources than New York  have barriers that prevent people from being pushed onto the tracks. Why not New York too!

Sign this petition to call upon Mayor Adams, Governor Hochul, our Federal, State and City elected officials and the MTA to put in barriers, first in heavily traveled stations such as Times Square, where Michelle Go tragically lost her life.

Yes, it would be nice if nobody had to worry about meeting such a grisly death, but let’s examine the four deaths cited in this petition:

The most recent one is the one that’s highlighted in the petition, that of Michelle Go. She was pushed to her death by this man:

Simon Martial admits fatally shoving Michelle Alyssa Go to death in New York

Here’s the suspect in a 2016 fatal New York subway pushing:

Here’s the man who killed an Asian man by pushing him in front of a subway train in 2012:

naeem davis

A woman who pushed an Indian man to his death on the New York subway in 2012 is described as:

Hispanic, in her 20s, heavyset and about 5-foot-5, wearing a blue, white and gray ski jacket and Nike sneakers with gray on top and red on the bottom.

Here’s a man who shoved a woman onto an approaching subway train in 2019:

Unhinged straphanger who shoved woman into Brooklyn train may face charges in earlier Queens subway attack - New York Daily News

As a matter of fact, of all the suspects who pushed people onto subway tracks in New York, over the past few years, practically none were white, with one possible exception. Almost all of the suspects are black or Latino.

How much would it cost to install these barriers? According to a Spectrum News article it would cost around 7 billion dollars, and even then, it would not include all tracks.

At this point, it appears that the City of New York is seriously considering this step; public pressure is mounting. If New York City were all white and Asian, there would be no need for such an expense, and there would be no pressure to take this step.

The City of New York is estimated to lose between $215 and $300 million per year due to turnstile jumping. According to governing.org, 89% of turnstile prosecutions were of blacks and Latinos. This means that in New York, blacks and Latinos are responsible for annual losses of about $223 million a year.

The odds of getting shoved into the path of a subway train are slim, but the odds of having to pay more in taxes (if you live in New York) are very high.

These are the costs of Diversity as it relates to the New York subway – death, injury, fear and astronomical costs. It’s hard to see a benefit in any of this.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Google and Media Collusion to Hide Images of White Murder Victims

Posted on January 22, 2022 by jewamongyou

It seems there’s a new corporate media guideline: When the murderer is black, and his victim white, do not show photos of both of them. In cases where the murderer is still at large, only the murderer’s photo will be shown, and the victim’s photo is flushed down the memory hole.

Thus, when corporate media reported on the killing of Suzanna Kauffman, and the discovery of her body in a hotel, the victim’s face is left to our imagination:

This story appears numerous times in various news sites, and each time, we see the image of the murderer, Quincy Cheeks Hannah.

Wanted man arrested in Florida after missing woman found dead at hotel in Mocksville, deputies say

But not a single site shows us Suzanna’s face. A google search of Suzanna Kaufman (or Suzzane Kaufman, as it’s sometimes spelled) yields nothing – except images of Susanne Kaufman, a “beauty pioneer” with no connection to the victim.

However, a Duckduckgo image search does include a photo of the actual victim:

It’s on the gofundme page dedicated to her funeral expenses. My guess is that the girl is a product of the union between Kauffman and Quincy Hannah. I think the money would be better spent teaching young white women to stick with white men. That would save a lot of lives, and a lot of taxpayer money.

Posted in Africa and blacks, crime and violence, examples of propaganda, miscegenation | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Woke School Teacher Openly Admits to Teaching CRT to her 6th Grade Students

Posted on January 21, 2022 by jewamongyou

How often have we seen the claim that Critical Race Theory is strictly college-level material, and that grade-school children are not the target?

Take NBC News for example. The headline loudly proclaims:

Teaching critical race theory isn’t happening in classrooms, teachers say in survey

… and yet when we read the actual article, it clearly states that almost 4% of teachers reported that their schools actually REQUIRE them to teach CRT to their students. 45% of these teachers feel they should have the option to teach it. If 45% of these teachers feel that they should have the option to teach CRT to their students, and (apparently) none of their schools actually forbid it (except where now prohibited by state law), the obvious conclusion is that at least 45% of these teachers are actually teaching CRT to their students:

The association surveyed its professional membership between June 24 and June 29 and received 1,134 completed responses, nearly 900 of them from traditional public schools. More than 96 percent said their schools did not require them to teach critical race theory, and only 45 percent said that teachers should have the option to add it to their lesson plans.

Taking NBC’s reasoning to its logical conclusion, we can argue that if less than 45% of teachers feel they should be allowed to sexually assault their students, we shouldn’t have laws against it. After all, most teachers are not so inclined.

The article goes on to quote one of the teachers:

Jenni Meadows, a teacher at a public high school near Dallas who specializes in teaching reading to at-risk youth, participated in the survey. She said the critical race theory discussion is not one that she’s having with her students because the focus in K-12 is on developing critical thinking skills.

Ironically, the author of this article, one Phil McCausland, assumes that his readers lack critical thinking skills – and he’s probably right in most cases.

Does Indianapolis Public Schools promote the teaching of CRT to K-12 students? Yes, it does. The district has a “Resource Guide for White Teachers” which includes a blog. Prominently featured on the blog is a post by former 6th grade teacher Thu Anh Nguyen. It’s titled:

Brand New Pandemic, Same Old White Supremacy

Even in the face of a global pandemic, white supremacy has been relentless. The chaos of schools regrouping so quickly was used as a reason to cut budgets so that professional development was completely frozen. That professional development was often the only way to offer and hold teachers accountable for doing social justice work. And when many of us asked what will happen this coming year to reengage with this essential work, our questions were met with silence.

And now the country and its schools are caught in the debate about critical race theory. In so many states, legislatures have proposed bills or passed laws that now ban teaching about the ways racism has shaped American public policy and, thus, the society. Critical race theory isn’t new, of course. But white supremacists have been actively misrepresenting it and using this misrepresentation to strengthen their grip on society and control what is taught in schools. It has come clear to me that this tactic is a symbol of how white supremacy, like the Delta variant, can mutate to be more effective. 

I have taught English Literature and Social Studies my entire career to date — and have always included critical race theory as an essential lens through which to understand literature and society. How could I teach any book written in the United States without discussing racism? How could I be asked to teach books written mostly by dead white men without honestly and openly criticizing the curriculum? 

The key argument against teaching critical race theory in schools, especially in the primary and secondary schools, is that students are not developmentally ready for a discussion of racism or that the discussion itself is divisive. The question that needs to be answered, however, is who is not developmentally ready? My students and families of color have lived with racism their entire lives. When people talk about critical race theory being developmentally inappropriate, what they are really saying is that white supremacy uses white fragility to keep us from making the institutional changes that will lead to racial justice.

Bearing in mind that this blog is the very first link, in the “Teaching While White” section of the Indianapolis Public Schools official webpage, it should be obvious that the views expressed by Thu Anh Nguyen are considered acceptable and wholesome by the school district.

Let’s summarize those views:

  1. Taxpayer dollars should be spent to enable school teachers to participate in “social justice” activism.
  2. Critical Race Theory is, and should be, taught to sixth grade students.
  3. Anybody who objects to young children being taught CRT is a white-supremacist, and is “fragile.”
  4. Books by “dead white men” should only be taught through the lens of criticism.

I’ll point out that Thu Anh Nguyen was born in Vietnam – and judging by her views, it appears that Vietcong Communism found fertile ground in her mind.

She also seems to have a case of lukophobia (an unreasonable fear of white people). In her blog, she tells of a nightmare she had:

In the dream, my white male head of school approached me with concerns from white parents that I was teaching too much about current events. The truth was too heavy a burden for kids to handle, he said. But if there is anything I have learned in fifteen years of teaching, kids are not the ones who cannot handle the truth. I have watched kids be the most resilient during the pandemic while adults have tried to catch up, or worse, actively work against change. 

I woke up from my nightmare wondering, are we going to learn anything from this pandemic? Who pays the cost of keeping things the way they are? Students and families of color certainly pay a huge toll.

She is a firm supporter of BLM, whose roots are in Communism, and I wonder if she is aware of the extent of black-on-Asian crime, such as this one (hat tip to The Mad Jewess):

Thai Woman, (Model) Savagely Beaten By Black Male On 34 St, NYC:

Posted on by davidbenmoshejtf

Thai Woman, (Model) Savagely Beaten By Black Male On 34 St, NYC:

By David Ben Moshe:

Beating up and mugging this Asian model, was it because she held slaves 175 years ago in America?

Bew Jirajariyawetch's injuries.

The perpetrator, who has yet to be caught:

Suspect.

Posted in crime and violence, examples of propaganda, government/corporate discrimination against whites | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments